* Sub rv;^* n c"t u.

J,tqu,) * *Yu
LffiGA!_ pR0[iffi$$[sN
ltl:3f-11:30 A.M.

'! la'ttrodustion ts the Logat Fnelfoswioni

1. J lll,rilaif y'$ 4ldsdsd lo ,SIlJy d-sw

i.2 Prop}inlJ fo.r ffw Eal

tr. Ilanr r \1'l - P-&t.a.r-'^ f' ba"

What is PftASTiCE 0F LAVII?

WA6t orB ,ho ossontrsr cnlorfr. i;l c; 611ge$@r|'ent ,n
'frarynrrh11p6J
t"*
t!,{,practtrt}@o{tawe?
PW'!;lq l}:::"q'
,vrn:t or dr6 nann' RaY##t Wet pro!@s'ion?
ara

$Jj / 2.1 Cayntano v$. Mon$o{i, 201 SORA XA (1991i

f.2 Sfa. Jllona vs. "t-ueson, 11 SCf?A 562 (1964)

/?.3 Ulap vs. Lsgal Ciinic,223 SCRA 3?8 (1993)

/2./x ln Nt: Atthu{ Cr.rB!'ss, ?85 SC&{ $S (1998,i

./2.11 LeLl$.sm6 W Climsca, 57 S.C&A 473 (19V4)

/ 2.6 R$gala vs. Sandiganbayan, 262- SCRA 122 (1996). .
t 2V P*!)si Cala vs. flrr,, ofltppa8ls, ?99 $Cl?I 518 (t$98.i

..,/ A.8 Yum6!vs. AW. Fanar, Sr., A.C ldo. 6585, Aptil21,2005 .

/ 2.9 Cnrz vs. AW. Csbr6ra, A.C. lto. 5737" Ad. 25, 2AA4 '
c .fts$siir$ tfo$ iiJ$r ettd prasgf,'at e! !-ew

, . t$ ,4gfuina vs. Rann. g" lld ,Vo. 1036, ,JLins 10, 2009
 3 &.drmlssio$ to th@ prectic@ ef Law
/33 lnRs: Lanu,yo |.d6 SiCRA 2a5) Ann. lq,nl,
. 3.? ,S6c6onse$,6of &.ria t3{i, {997 fifils$ of Courl

, 3.3 Ra: Applicatic'n af A,M. Hernandez, July 27, 1gg3'

,/ 3.4 fapuoat vs. Tapucar, A.C. Na. 4'148, JUU 3A, 1998

,/3.S rrl rs Al A.go$/,?o, LM No- 712, July I3, 1*95

,/ 3.6 RE: Nlpplicefion f*rAdmission fo tfia Pttitippina Bar, Vrbofits O. Chtng 8.M A/o.
914, Oct. '1, lgg9

7 3.V Tan vs.,Sebendel, 8.t4. No. 44, Feb. 24, 1992

c f,{oy N4}'J-LA!MVF,RS sppssfl rn *orrrf?

3.S S6{:$0n 34, Rulo ,38

3.$ Ru/e 116, Sor{idr I

3.19 Ariicle 22?, p* 4.rg a"e aneDdsd - l-abor Cod6 of fh6 Phi#ropin$s

3" 11 Act i(o. 22$9, Gsdssilu/ Ec{ S6tll.on $.

o srtr4tuo C/qffSOX 6&GA6g dm preecrtce of fow?

',ho
3. ti Rr,'r'd ?,48, S4lsdion 35

3.13 Articig yfll S$cfio'' t5, 1987 Fft rppino Consl,fution

3. 1 4 Articts lX^A, Sgcfrbrl a 1 987 {rkilipping to stitotian

3 1$ Articls Xl, liocticn 8, 198V Philiplsiuo Consftful,on

3.t$ ftA l?60, Lacal66vemmsd Afida, Setd,orl9{].

4 fiil*mberehip &n tfls IEP

. 4.1 ln ra AW. terri,tf F.crr:!iion, A.M. 192, August 3, t87f
S!^.r9 $: / 4..! ln th€ Mettsr cf fhs ,rfttogrsr/{rr| of ah6 Ba,i 49 SCRA ?6, ian" g, Ig73
cc+1, a , tat)
q5\-5'M
c +tsyordnf of ,EP Due.s

I-att$r of Atty. Coeilia V. Arsvsla, JL, B.M. N$. l:i/o, Mey 6, ?Q$$
'.t 4.4 Ssnfos, Jr. vs. Llanlss, A.C. hlo. 4749, Jan. 24, 20Q0
 5 Fereipectivo*l of Legal Hdueaflom
$.1 Rule i3& Revise.J Rulss of Coarf

5.? Rrlte t3&A, fisri$od,eu/6s ot Courl

,5.3 8{}rtifsff6r iJrr. tlFJ, fio: Lott6r of Atty. estslito Ft Mencloza proposing
Refonns in
nuro liio or" iho R"'uiee ot cou4
th$ Bar Hrsmiiratio'rs throrroh Amondmernts ro
g.
Ldarch ZAXa

V5.4 Aiao vs. Martina:,7$ORA ?45 (156J)

ft\o,,_^ xq, rjr,b l?,,Ji
.3.5 h1{a Amfflrc,6f SCfeA t?0 (19/4.t tir.^]

What ans tho pnfv$lo$os and dtltios ef e Lewv6r?

.r l"sttryrorJ.t (,)s{itr'

6.1 .9aclio'} ?0, Ruto t38, Ru/e$ ofco rt

7 Oode ef Proto$s;snal Ro*ponsibilfty tor l-awryors.

/7.X Vde. De ilisrB$ vs ,/#s$co U,?a/uz, lA.C. No.4451. Junaig, lggT) \\.!t|
! 7.2 Sungao Min^rsl flasavatian Boad vs. Ctadbat (A1 SCRA 1) ( irr^4ir^)
'/7.3 Garcis r,$. Fi-oncrbr{) {2?0 $CftA S1g} t "be\
o 7.4 Bstrgu!)t Etaclnc Cory. vs. ,{:foras
fBl $Cp,.A d.4g, M reh 1g ,9gS) t !{,\\
/ 7.5 Dee ys. #offrt of Apf,sa/s (116 SCF{A 657.). I rr"".F\)
/ 7.6 *rldivar vs. Gonzn/a.s, t66 SCF.,4 316 (1SSSJ

J 7"7 Castafterla vs. flg\g) ( cr.t r

4go, tsg SCR4 5A5

/7.8e Ssttastian ys. {.}sJis,314SCRA 7, Sspt p, 1999 v (ortsk)

./ /.9 frarnsnfGs ys. pa#jol A.e. No. 1512, Jan. ?9, ttjp3 ( s* r-^,i 1

J /.f,s J:Bmsrlda: ys. Grp{ra,,4.C. No. 5694, Juft6 17, 19% tu} \_1
J V.I l itt !t! Lsursts. 148 $r,RA SAp { l*-t")

I What ftr6 tfn6 Srounds for D!$BA,RMHNI'?

8.1 Sscti?n 27, Rut6 1J8
 9 WhaI [g tho FROCEDTJRE FOR &!$tsARMEI{T?
9.1 in Roj Rusfe f 70 PH1L 24i) 1qnn"6"t !a'11 27rt4'10

g.2 MunDz vs. Psopte 63 SCP(,. 190) | \J''ir)

10 May a disban€d lawyor bo REIIIISTATEO?

1A.1 Pntdsntiaf Bank v8. Bani$nin Grecis (192 SCR'{
381) t Yh"''h{^t)
755) ( P!."&1"\
fi.2 cui vs. cui (11 S?RA

F'-