11-01-07 Log Cabin Republicans V USA Et Al (10-56634) at The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion To Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers As Published in The Online PACER Dockets S

Digitally signed
by Joseph Zernik
Human Rights Alert DN: cn=Joseph
Zernik, o, ou,
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 email=jz12345@e
Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net arthlink.net, c=US
Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Date: 2011.01.08
18:30:42 +02'00'
Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
11-01-08 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) - Motion to Intervene and

Concomitantly Filed Papers (Dkt #39-47), as published in the online PACER docket.
On January 6, or 7, 2011, Dr Joseph Zernik's Motion to intervene and concomitantly filed papers in the
caption, referenced above, were published in the PACER docket of Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-
56634 and 10-56813) under docket numbers #39-47 under 10-56634, and docket numbers #10-18 under 10-
56813.
# Dkt Document Name Page

#
1) January 8, 2011 Request for Copies of the respective NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity) 2
2) Case Summary: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) 4
3) Case Summary: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (56813) 6
4) 39 1: Request for Leave to File, Notice to Reliably Inform the Court, and Motion to Intervene 8
5) 40 2: Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer 37
6) 41 3: Motion for Declaratory Mandate in re: Joseph Zernik v Jacqueline Connor et al (2:08- 42
cv-01550) - The uncertified April 24, 2009 Judgment in Zernik v Connor et al was, is, and
always will be void, not voidable
7) 42 4: Motion for an Order to Show Cause in re: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (2:04-cv- 94
08425) and the uncertified October 12, 2010 Judgment on USA and Log Cabin
Republicans - Why instant Appeals should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and/or
mootness
8) 43 5: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs are court records subject to the First 128
Amendment rights
9) 44 6: Motion for Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs, as currently drafted, are invalid as 135
electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the Clerk; the US District Court shall
immediately draft valid electronic certificates of authentication/ attestation by the Clerk
10) 45 7: Motion for Declaratory Mandate: Establishment of CM/ECF in the US District Court 144
through the General Order 08-02 amounts to Deprivation of Rights
11) 46 8: Request for Incorporation by Reference 167
12) 47 9: Request for permission to obtain CM/ECF password 172
January 8, 2011 Request for Copies of NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity)
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:30:59

To: Raymond_Fisher@ca9.uscourts.gov, anthony.steinmeyer@usdoj.gov,
august.flentje@usdoj.gov, henry.whitaker@usdoj.gov, dwoods@whitecase.com,
emiller@whitecase.com, aakahn@whitecase.com
From: joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) - Motion to
Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers (Dkt #39-47) - Request for copies of
the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity)
RE: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) - Motion to Intervene

and Concomitantly Filed Papers (Dkt #39-47) - Request for copies of the
NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity)
a. US Court of Appeal, 9th Circuit, Office of the Clerk

Raymond Fisher (Raymond_Fisher@ca9.uscourts.gov)
b. Counsel for the Defendants/Appellants

Anthony J. Steinmeyer (anthony.steinmeyer@usdoj.gov)
(202) 514-3388
August E. Flentje (august.flentje@usdoj.gov)
(202) 514-3309
Henry Whitaker (henry.whitaker@usdoj.gov)
(202) 514-3180
Attorneys, Civil Division, Appellate Staff
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Room 7256
Washington, D.C. 20530
c. Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee

Dan Woods (dwoods@whitecase.com)
(213) 620-7772
Earle Miller (emiller@whitecase.com)
(213) 620-7785
Aaron Kahn (aakahn@whitecase.com)
(213) 620-7751
White & Case LLP
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1900
Los Angeles, CA 90071-200
TO THE COURT AND TO COUNSEL FOR LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS

AND THE USA:
On January 6, or 7, 2011, Dr Joseph Zernik's Motion to intervene and

concomitantly filed papers in the caption, referenced above, were published in the
PACER docket of Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634 and 10-56813)
under docket numbers #39-47 under 10-56634, and docket numbers #10-18 under
10-56813.
However, upon review of the papers, as published online, it was apparent that the
clerk's stamps, appearing on the face pages of Dkt #39-47, as numbered in 10-
56634, were neither signed nor dated as "Filed", or "Docketed" by the Clerk of
the Court.
Therefore, absent access to the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity) there is no

way for pro se filer Dr Joseph Zernik and for the public at large to ascertain,
whether the publication of the papers in the online PACER docket was indeed
deemed by the Clerk of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, as valid and
effectual filing and docketing of the above referenced papers.
Therefore, while the Motion for CM/ECF password is pending, the Clerk and/or
Parties are requested to forward to pro se filer Dr Joseph Zernik paper or
electronic copies of the respective NDAs at the mailing or emailing addresses
provided below.
Your expedient response in this matter would further Due Process and First
Amendment rights of the pro se filer and the public at large.
Dated: January 8, 2010
Joseph Zernik, PhD
BY: Joseph Zernik, PhD

Human Rights Alert (NGO)
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
TEL: (323) 521-6209
E-mail: (jz12345@earthlink.net)
1/8/2011 10-56634 Summary
If you view the Full Docket you will be charged for 4 Pages $0.32
General Docket
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals Docket #: 10-56634 Docketed: 10/15/2010

Nature of Suit: 2890 Other Statutory Actions
Log Cabin Republicans v. USA, et al
Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Central California, Los Angeles
Fee Status: USA - No Fee Req
Case Type Information:

1) civil
2) united states
3) null
Originating Court Information:

District: 0973-2 : 2:04-cv-08425-VAP-E
Court Reporter: Blanca Aguilar, Official Court Reporter
Trial Judge: Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge
Date Filed: 10/12/2004
Date Order/Judgment: Date Order/Judgment EOD: Date NOA Filed: Date Rec'd COA:
10/12/2010 10/12/2010 10/14/2010 10/14/2010
ecf.ca9.uscourts.gov/…/TransportRoom… 1/2
1/8/2011 10-56634 Summary
01/06/2011 38 Entered appearance of Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634 and Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-
56813. [7604290] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 40 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 request for lenience as a pro se filier. Served on
12/27/2010. [7604305] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 41 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 motion for a declaratory mandate in Zernik v.
Connor... Served on 12/27/2010. [7604312] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 42 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 motion for an order to show cause in re: Log Cabin
Republicans v. USA. Served on 12/27/2010. [7604316] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 43 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 motion for a declaratory mandate: The NEF's are
public records. . Served on 12/27/2010. [7604322] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 44 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 motion for a declaratory mandate - The NEF, as
drafted, is an invalid certification record. Served on 12/27/2010. [7604328] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 45 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 motion for a declaratory mandate: The establishment
of Pacer and CM/ECF...amounts to deprivation of rights... Served on 12/27/2010. [7604335] [10-56634, 10-56813]
(CW)
01/06/2011 46 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 request for incorporation by reference. Served on
12/27/2010. [7604340] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 47 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 verified request for permission to obtain CM/ECF
password. Served on 12/27/2010. [7604345] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/07/2011 39 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 request to file, ntc to reliably inform the ct of
unprofessional conduct, motion to intervene. Served on 12/27/2010. [7604298] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt
01/08/2011 07:11:08
PACER Login: dr2600 Client Code:
Description: Case Summary Search Criteria: 10-56634
Billable Pages: 1 Cost: 0.08
1/8/2011 10-56813 Summary
If you view the Full Docket you will be charged for 2 Pages $0.16
General Docket
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals Docket #: 10-56813 Docketed: 11/19/2010

Nature of Suit: 2890 Other Statutory Actions
Log Cabin Republicans v. USA, et al
Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Central California, Los Angeles
Fee Status: Paid
Case Type Information:

1) civil
2) united states
3) null
Originating Court Information:

District: 0973-2 : 2:04-cv-08425-VAP-E
Court Reporter: Blanca Aguilar, Official Court Reporter
Trial Judge: Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge
Date Filed: 10/12/2004
Date Order/Judgment: Date Order/Judgment EOD: Date NOA Filed: Date Rec'd COA:
10/12/2010 10/12/2010 11/18/2010 11/18/2010
1/8/2011 10-56813 Summary
01/06/2011 9 Entered appearance of Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634 and Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-
56813. [7604290] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 11 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 request for lenience as a pro se filier. Served on
12/27/2010. [7604305] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 12 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 motion for a declaratory mandate in Zernik v.
Connor... Served on 12/27/2010. [7604312] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 13 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 motion for an order to show cause in re: Log Cabin
Republicans v. USA. Served on 12/27/2010. [7604316] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 14 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 motion for a declaratory mandate: The NEF's are
public records. . Served on 12/27/2010. [7604322] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 15 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 motion for a declaratory mandate - The NEF, as
drafted, is an invalid certification record. Served on 12/27/2010. [7604328] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 16 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 motion for a declaratory mandate: The establishment
of Pacer and CM/ECF...amounts to deprivation of rights... Served on 12/27/2010. [7604335] [10-56634, 10-56813]
(CW)
01/06/2011 17 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 request for incorporation by reference. Served on
12/27/2010. [7604340] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/06/2011 18 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 verified request for permission to obtain CM/ECF
password. Served on 12/27/2010. [7604345] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
01/07/2011 10 Filed Intervenor - Pending Joseph Zernik in 10-56634, 10-56813 request to file, ntc to reliably inform the ct of
unprofessional conduct, motion to intervene. Served on 12/27/2010. [7604298] [10-56634, 10-56813] (CW)
PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt
01/08/2011 04:57:13
PACER Login: dr2600 Client Code:
Description: Case Summary Search Criteria: 10-56813
Billable Pages: 1 Cost: 0.08
Case: 10-56634 01/07/2011 Page: 1 of 29 ID: 7604298 DktEntry: 39
\ RECEIVE 0
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JAN 06 2011
FILED
DOCKE=TE=D-----
DATE
Case Nos 10-56634 and 10-56813
j.
IN THE UNIED STATES COURT OF APPEALS !
FOR THE NINTH CIRCillT
Log Cabin Republicans,

a non-profit corporation,
Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross Appellant,
vs
United States of America; Robert M Gates,

Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity,
Defendants-Appellants/Cross Appellees.
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No CV 04-8425, Honorable Virginia A Phillips, Judge
1: [PROPOSED] INTERVENOR DR JOSEPH ZERNIK'S REQUEST TO

FILE, NOTICE TO RELIABLY INFORM THE COURT OF
UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, AND NOTICE OF MOTION AND
VERIFIED MOTION TO INTERVENE *
Digitally signed
Joseph Zemik, PhD by Joseph Zemik
Human Rights Alert (NOO) DN: cn=Joseph
~. JJ Zemik. o. OU.
In Pro Se ). ~L.email=jz1234S@e
~
rthlihk.netc=us
2231 South Court, Palo Alto, CA 94301 • Date: 2010.12.27
Telephone: (323) 521-6209, Facsimile (213) 261-9881 14:43:22 +02'00'
jzI2345@earthlink.net ,
Simultaneously filed with the Senate and House Judiciary, Armed Services, and Finance Committees,
UN Human Rights Council, and the Basel Accords Committee on Intemational Banking
,.
A. TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. Table of Contents ... 1
B. List of Exhibits ... i
C. List of Cases and Courts ... iii
D. Table of Authorities ... 111
E. Notice ... 1
F. Request to File, Notice to Inform, and Motion To Intervene ... 3
G. Point & Authorities in re: Notice to Reliably Inform the Court ... 4
H. Points & Authorities in re: Motion to Intervene ... 7
I. Points & Authorities in re: Intervention Per Se ... 11
1. Claims ... 12
K. Case Status ... 13
L. Request For Intervention & Prayer for Relief ... 14
M. Statement of Verification ... 15
N. Certificate of Service
B. LIST OF EXIDBITS
1: Notice and Motion to Intervene
Exhibit 1:1: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (2:04-cv-08425):

Notices to parties of intent to intervene and request to confer
2: Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer
None
3: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate in re: Zernik v Connor et al
i
1: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO INTERVENE
Exhibit 3:1: Zernikv Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550):

a) March 5,2009 Complaint (DIct #001) (face page), and
b) The respective NEF, bearing the 'electronic document stamp', as required by
General Order 08-02 for valid electronic certificate of authentication/attestation
Exhibit 3:2: Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550):
a) March 7, 2008 Order Returning Case for Reassignment (DIct #009). and
b) The respective NEF, missing the 'electronic document stamp'
Exhibit 3:3: Zernikv Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550):
a) April 24, 2009 Judgment (DIct #107), and
Exhibit 3:4: Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550):
a) Table form summary ofNEFs' validity, or lack thereof, and
b) Compiled NEFs of Judicial, and Clerical Records, as obtained from the office of
the Clerk on December 29, 2009.
4: Motion for an Order to Show Cause in re: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et at
Exhibit 4:1: Fine v Sheriffet al (2:09-cv-01914):

a) The March 19/20,2009 Petition for Habeas Corpus (DIct #01) (face page), and the
respective NEF, bearing the 'electronic document stamp', as required by General
Order 08-02 for valid electronic certificate of authentication/attestation;
b) The June 29,2009 Judgment (DIct #31). Upon inspection on December 29,2009,
the respective NEF, was discovered to be missing the 'electronic document
stamp'.
c) The February 18, 2010 Mandate (DIct #59) as docketed in the US District Court -
with no certification by a Circuit Judge and with no NDA (Notice of Docket
Activity) from the US Court of Appeals, and the respective NEF, bearing no
'electronic document stamp'.
December 6, 2010, request upon counsel of parties in the Appeals to provide copies
of the NEFs in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al in the US District Court, and
confirmation of receipt by counsel for the USA.
December 9,2010, request upon Clerk of the US District Court Terry Nafisi to
provide copies of the NEFs and certify the PACER docket.
5: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate in re: The NEFs are Public Records
None
6: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate in re: The NEFs as Currently Drafted
None
7: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate in re: General Order 08-02 and CMlECF
ii
1: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO lNTERVENE
Exhibit 7:1: Fine v Sher£ff(2:09-cv-01914):

Correspondence with the California Judicial Council regarding appearances by
Attorney Kevin McConnick on behalf of the Superior Court of California
8: Request for Incorporation by Reference
None
9: Request for CMlECF Password
None
C. LIST OF CASES AND COURTS
1. Joseph Zernik v Jacqueline Connor et al (2:08-cv-0 1550), USDC, CACD
2. Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (2:04-cv-08425), USDC, CACD
3. Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634 and 10-56813), USCA, 9th
4. Richard I Fine v Sher£ffofLos Angeles County et al (2:09-cv-01914), USDC, CACD
5. Richard Fine v Sher£ffofLos Angeles County et al (09-56073), USCA, 9TH
D. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Equal Protection Rights ... 3:5; 4:8; 7:7
Access to the Courts Rights ... 3:5; 4:8;7:3,6,9
First Amendment Rights ... 3:5; 5:2,3,6; 7:3,4,5,6;
5:4
Federal Due Process Rights ... 1:12; 3:5; 4:6,8; 5:4,6;
6:6,7; 7:3,4,5,6,8,9;
9:2
Code of Conduct of US Judge ... 1:3
iii
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ... 1:1,2,5,6,8,9,10; 4:4,5
28 USC §1691 ... 1:6
28 USC §2071-7, Rule Making Enabling Act ... 5:4; 7:4
42 USC §1983, Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law ... 5:6, 7:2,9
Brown v. Board o/Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) ... 7:9
Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc 435 U.S. 589 (1978) ... 5:4
Erickson v Pardus et ai, 551 U.S. 89 (S. Ct., Jun. 4, 2007) ... 2:2
Haddock v California Board o/Dental Examiners, US Crt App 9th Circ, (Nov 26, 1985);
777 F.2d462 ... 2:2
iv
i.:...
;
E. [PROPOSED] INTERVENOR JOSEPH ZERNIK'S NOTICE OF REQUEST
TO FILE, NOTICE TO RELIABLY INFORM THE COURT, AND MOTION TO
INERVENE
TO THE COURT AND PARTIES OF RECORD, please notice Dr Joseph Zernik's
Request for Leave to File, Notice to Reliably Inform the Court of Unprofessional
Conduct, and Verified Motion to Intervene, filed herein pursuant to FRCivP.
The papers, which are concomitantly filed under separate covers, should be deemed
,
:.
integral part of this Request, including, but not limited to: ~
, .'
.'
3: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate in re: Zernik v Connor et al

The Motion and its exhibits include a unique set of records, documenting litigation in
the US District Court, Central District of California, where all judicial and clerical
records were issued with invalid electronic certificates of authentication/attestation
(NEFs - Notices of Electronic Filing) by the Clerk, with no name of the 'Filer' listed, and
with no 'electronic document stamp'.
Such records included, but were not limited to, the Summonses, as issued by the
Clerk, the Assignment to a US Judge, the Referral to a US Magistrate, and the Judgment.
The Clerk of the US District Court has refused to certify the PACER (online public
access system) docket in the case.
The judicial and clerical records and the litigation as a whole should be deemed by
the Court null and void.
j
r.
1/15
Case: 10-56634 01107/2011 Page: 7 of 29 ID: 7604298 DktEntry: 39
4: Motion for an Order to Show Cause in re: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al
The Clerk of the US District has refused to pennit access to the electronic certificates
of authentication/attestation by the Clerk (NEFs) in this case, including, but not limited
to, the certificate of the October 12, 2010 Judgment, from which the Appeals were taken.
The Clerk of the Court has also refused to certify the PACER docket in the case.
Regardless, sufficient evidence is provided from the PACER docket to conclude that
Log Cabin Republicans v USA et ai, like Zernik v Connor et ai, was litigation, was
litigation in the US District Court, where all judicial and clerical records, including but
not limited to the uncertified October 12,2010 Judgment should be deemed by the Court
null and void.
The Motion for Order to Show Cause accordingly calls upon the parties to the
Appeals to answer why the Appeals, taken from the uncertified October 12,2010
Judgment, should not be dismissed for lack ofjurisdiction, alternatively, for mootness.
5: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs are Public Records
6: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs as Currently Drafted are invalid
as electronic certificates by the Clerk
7: Motion for Declaratory Mandate: Establishment of CMJECF in the US District
Court through the General Order 08-02 amounts to Deprivation of Rights.
The three additional Motions, listed above, are concomitantly filed, requesting
remedies pertaining to underlying conditions at the US District Court, Central District of
California, which enabled the conduct oflitigation in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et ai,
where the Clerk of the Court denies access to certification of the Judgment, and refuses to
certify the PACER docket.
,.
2/15
The cases, which are subject of this filing, are of high public policy significance,
pertaining to Constitutional and Civil Rights, Banking Regulation, and management of
the Armed Services.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: December 27th , 2010 Joseph Zernik
By: _
Joseph Zernik, PhD
[Proposed} Intervenor, In Pro Se
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
jz12345@earthlink.net
F. [PROPOSED] INTERVENOR DR JOSEPH ZERNIK'S REQUEST TO FILE,
NOTICE TO RELIABLY INFORM THE COURT, AND VERIFIED MOTION TO
INTERVENE
TO THE COURT AND PARTIES OF RECORD, Intervenor Dr Joseph Zernik
("Zernik") herein files the Request to File, Notice to Reliably Inform the Court, and
Verified Motion to Intervene in the Appeals under Log Cabin Republicans v United
States ofAmerica et al (10-56634 and 10-56813), pursuant to FRCivP.
1. The following papers are concomitantly filed under separate covers, and should be
deemed integral parts of instant Request to File, Notice to Reliably Inform the Court,
and Motion to Intervene.
3/15
The papers are numbered as follows:
1: Request for Leave to File, Notice to Reliably Inform the Court, and Motion to
Intervene;
2: Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer;
3: Motion for Declaratory Mandate in re: Joseph Zernik v Jacqueline Connor et al
(2:08-cv-01550) - The uncertified April 24, 2009 Judgment in Zernik v Connor et
al was, is, and always will be void, not voidable;
4: Motion for an Order to Show Cause in re: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al
(2:04-cv-08425) and the uncertified October 12,2010 Judgment on USA and Log
Cabin Republicans - Why instant Appeals should not be dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction and/or mootness;
5: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs are court records subject to the
First Amendment rights;
6: Motion for Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs, as currently drafted, are invalid as
electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the Clerk; the US District
Court shall immediately draft valid electronic certificates of authentication/
attestation by the Clerk;
7: Motion for Declaratory Mandate: Establishment of CM/ECF in the US District
Court through the General Order 08-02 amounts to Deprivation of Rights;
8: Request for Incorporation by Reference; and
9: Request for permission to obtain CMlECF password.
Toe
G. POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN RE: NOTICE TO RELIABLY INFORM
4/15
Case: 10-56634 01/07/2011 Page: 10 of29 ID: 7604298 DktEntry: 39
THE COURT OF UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT UNDER LOG CABIN
REPUBLICANS V UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL (2:04-cv-8425) AND
ZERNIK V CONNOR ET AL (2:08-cv-OI550)
1. The Code of Conduct of US Judges calls upon US judges to initiate corrective
actions relative to reliable evidence of unprofessional conduct in the courts.
The Code ofConduct of US Judges, Canon 3, B (3) says:
A judge should initiate appropriate action when the judge becomes aware of
reliable evidence indicating the likelihood of unprofessional conduct by a judge or
lawyer.
2. Instant Notice informs the Court of reliable evidence of unprofessional conduct
in litigation under Log Cabin Republicans v United States ofAmerica et at and
litigation under Zernik v Connor et at in the US District Court.
Instant Notice to Reliably Inform the Court and the concomitantly filed papers,
provide reliable evidence of conduct, which resulted in:
a) The construction of vague and ambiguous and/or void, not voidable electronic
dockets in PACER (the online public access system) under Log Cabins
Republicans v United States ofAmerica et al and under Zernik v Connor et ai,
both in the US District Court, Central District of California,
b) Incorporation in the dockets of the two cases of vague and ambiguous and/or
void, not voidable uncertified October 12, 2010 Judgment and Permanent
Injunction (Dkt #252) and uncertified April 24, 2009 Judgment (Dkt #107),
respectively, and
c) Underlying conditions at the District Court, which enabled the conduct described
in a) and b), above.
3. Reliable evidence is provided in the Motion for Declaratory Mandate in re:
5/15
Zernik v Connor et al (3:) and the concomitantly filed papers for the Court to
rule that the April 24, 2009 Judgment (Dkt #107) under Zernik v Connor et ai, is
void, not voidable.
In Zernik v Connor et al access was gained, after long delays, to the electronic
certificates of authentication/attestation (NEFs - Notices of Electronic Filing) pertaining
to judicial and clerical records. All the NEFs were found invalid. (See 3: Motion for
Declaratory Mandate in re: Joseph Zernik v Jacqueline Connor et al.)

,
j
"
•
Accordingly, it is claimed that the evidence is conclusive that the litigation PACER
docket as a whole was and is null and void, and the judicial and clerical records, which
i
were published in it, including but not limited to the April 24, 2009 Judgment, are void, i.·
not voidable ones.
4. Reliable evidence is provided in the Motion for an Order to Show Cause in re:
Log Cabins Republicans v United States ofAmerica et al (4:) and the
concomitantly filed papers that the uncertified October 12, 2010 Judgment is
void, not voidable.
Reliable evidence is provided in the Motion to Intervene and the concomitantly filed
papers that the PACER docket and the two contradictory Judgments Log Cabins
Republicans v United States ofAmerica et al are null and void.
In Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al the Clerk of the US District Court has denied
public access to the NEFs. Therefore, the October 12, 2010 Judgment, from which the
Appeals were taken, is uncertified.
In Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al the Clerk of the US District Court has denied
requests to certify the PACER docket.
6/15
Under such circumstances, the Court should grant the Motion for an Order to Show
Cause: Why the Appeals should not be dismissed for lack ofjurisdiction, alternatively,
for mootness.
5. Additional reliable evidence is provided, and additional corrective actions are
proposed in the Motions for Declaratory Mandates in re: The NEFs are Public
Records (5:), in re: The NEFs are Invalid as Drafted (6:), and in re:
Establishment of CMlECF through the General Order 08-02 (7:).
The three additional Motions, listed above, reliably inform the Court of circumstances
at the US District Court, which enabled the conduct of litigations under Zernik v Connor
et al and Log Cabin Republicans v the USA et ai, as described above.
The three Motions, listed above (5:, 6:, 7:), also propose appropriate corrective
actions, through the Mandates on the US District Court to: a) Restore public access to the
NEFs, b) Redraft the NEFs as valid certificates of authentication/attestation under the
authority of the Clerk of the Court, and c) Rescind the General Order 08-02 in part or in
full.
6. Therefore, the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, is respectfully requested to
accept the Notice, pursuant to the Code ofConduct of us Judges, and initiate the
appropriate and necessary corrective actions, including but not limited to
granting Zernik the Leave to File the Motion to Intervene and concomitantly
fIled paper.
For the reasons listed in paragraphs 1-5, above, and in the concomitantly filed papers,
the Court should initiate corrective actions regarding the Judgments in Zernik v Connor et
al and Log Cabin Republicans v the USA et ai, and underlying condition in the US
i
7/15
..
j.
J
District Court, including but not limited to granting Zernik's the Leave to File.
TOC ,.
H. POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN RE: MOTION TO INTERVENE
1. Zernik claims Intervention of Right pursuant to FRCivP 24(a)
a) Zernik claims timely Intervention of Right:
Zernik is filing his Motion to Intervene as soon as possible after he discovered the
facts in the matters outlined below, and while the appeals are in their initial stage.
b) Zernik claims an interest that is the subject of the action, based on the facts outlined
in the Motion to Intervene and the concomitantly filed papers:
As outlined below, the preponderance of the evidence indicates that the conduct
of the litigation in Log Cabin Republicans v United States ofAmerica et ai and in
Zernik v Connor et ai in the US District Court followed similar pattern.
Therefore, any ruling by the US Court of Appeals on the matters raised in the
Motion to Intervene and the concomitantly filed papers regarding validity, or lack
thereof, of the uncertified October 12,2010 Judgment in Log Cabin Republicans v
United States ofAmerica et ai, would directly affect Zernik's interests. "
c) Zernik further claims that no party adequately represents his interests:
Zernik's claims, pertaining to invalidity of the uncertified October 12,2010
Judgment in Log Cabin Republicans v United States ofAmerica et ai, detailed in the
Motion to Intervene and the concomitantly filed papers, have not been raised by
either the Log Cabin Republicans, or the USA. Zernik therefore claims that he is so
situated that disposing of the action may, as a practical matter, impair or impede his
ability to protect his interests and his ability to protect his Constitutional and Civil
8/15
Rights.
2. Alternatively, Zernik claims Permissive Intervention pursuant to FRCivP 24(b)
Zernik alternatively claims that the Court should allow Permissive Intervention, since
Zemik shares with both Log Cabin Republicans and the United States the main facts
pertaining to the conduct of the respective cases in the US District Court.
Therefore, there is commonality of law and of facts between the proposed
Intervention and the current Appeals under Los Cabin Republicans v United States of
America (10-56634 and 10-56813).
The commonality of law and facts between conduct of Log Cabin Republicans v
United States ofAmerica et al and Zernik v Connor et al in the US District Court is
outlined below, and further detailed in the Motion for Order to Show Cause in re: Log
Cabin Republicans v United States ofAmerica et al (4:), in the Motion for Mandate in re:
Zernik v Connor et al(3:), and in the concomitantly filed papers (5:,6:,7:).
a) Litigation of Zernik v Connor et al:
The Clerk refused to issue valid summons; no valid summons was served,
and service was not waived; the March 7, 2008 Order Returning Case for
Reassignment (Dkt #009), was issued with invalid NEF, missing the 'electronic
document stamp'; only invalid, void minutes and orders were issued and
published in the online PACER docket, all with invalid NEFs; an invalid April 24,
2009 Judgment was issued and published in the online PACER docket with
invalid NEF, and the Clerk of the US District Court refuses to certify the online
PACER docket of the case.
b) Litigation of Log Cabin Republicans v United States ofAmerica et al:
9/15
No record is available in the docket of the initial Complaint (Dkt #001) or of
the summons, as issued by clerk; no record is avaliable of execution/waiver of the
service of the summons; no valid Assignment Order for a Presiding Judge is
found in the docket; the two Judges issued two opposing judgments: The fIrst
judgment, in favor of the United States of America, dismissed the Log Cabin
Republicans' complaint, and was listed in the Judgment Index of the US District
Court; No appeal or other procedure overtunred the 2006 judgment; the second
judgment, in favor of the Log Cabin Republicas, was not listed in the Judgment
Index of the Court, and the Clerk ofthe US District Court refuses to certify the
docket of the case and also refuses to permit public access to electronic
certificates of authentication/attestation (NEFs) of the two judgments.
c) Commonality in remedies sought.
Due to the commonality in facts and law, the remedies sought in both Zernik v
Connor et al and Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al are also of the same nature,
i.
seeking to establish the lack of validity and effect of the PACER dockets and of
the judicial and clerical records, including, but not limited to the respective
uncertifIed judgments.
3. Zernik fulfIlled requirement for Notice and Service of instant Motion to
Intervene and the concomitantly fIled papers, pursuant to FRCivP 24(c)
a. Zemik provided Notice of Intent to Intervene (Exhibit 1:1), and also attempted to
confer with the parties to the Appeals.
b. Zemik served instant Motion to Intervene and the concomitantly fIled papers on
the parties pursuant to the Service List, below, and the Certificate of Service, is
10/15
provided herein (N, below).
c. Therefore, the Clerk of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit should not refuse to
file instant Zemik's papers, even if not in the fonn prescribed by FRCivP or by
Local Rules or practices.
4. The Proposed intervention is in the public interest
Beyond his individual interests, Zemik claims that his intervention is in the public
interest and in the interest of the furtherance ofjustice:
The Motion to Intervene and the concomitantly filed papers allege deprivation of the
Constitutional and Civil Rights of all who are similarly situated in the Central District of
California. :.,
~. .
Rulings by the Court on the matters, raised in the Intervention are likely to exert
profound impact on the integrity of online dockets and judicial records of the US District
Courts in California and beyond.
5. Therefore, the US Court of Appeals, 9tb Circuit, is respectfully requested to
grant Zernik the Motion to Intervene in the Appeals under Los Cabin
Republicans v United States ofAmerica (10-56634 and 10-56813).
For the reasons in paragraphs 1-4, above, and in the concomitantly filed papers, the
Court should grant the Motion to Intervene.
Toe
I. POINTS AND AUTHORITIES - PERTAINING TO INTERVENTION PER SE
1. In Zernik v Connor et ai, Zernik was denied the right for adjudication of his
complaint pursuant to the law of the United States and Due Process rights.
11/15
Based on the evidence, outlined in G and H, above, in the Motion for Mandate in re:
Zernik v Connor et al (3:), and the concomitantly filed papers, the Court should conclude
that the litigation in Zernik v Connor et al was conducted out of compliance with the
FRCivP, the Civil Litigation Management Manual of the Federal Judicial Council, First
Amendment and Due Process rights.
2. In Log Cabin Republicans v USA et ai, Log Cabin Republicans and the USA were
denied the right to have the complaint adjudicated pursuant to the law of the
United States and Due Process rights.
Based on the evidence, outlined in G and H, above, in the Motion for Order to Show
Cause in re: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (4:), and in the concomitantly filed
papers, the Court should conclude that the litigation in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et
al was conducted out of compliance with the FRCivP and the Civil Litigation
Management Manual of the Federal Judicial Council, First Amendment and Due Process
rights.
3. Conduct of the US District Court in Zernik v Connor et al and in Log Cabin
Republicans v the USA et al was enabled by conditions in the US District Court
related to implementation of CMlECF.
Based on the evidence, outlined in G and H, above, and in the concomitantly filed
papers, the Court should conclude that the conduct of litigation in Zernik v Connor et al
and in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al was closely linked to conditions that were
enabled through implementation ofCMlECF, including, but not limited to employment
ofthe NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing), as drafted, as the certificates of
authentication/attestation by the Clerk, and denial of public access to them.
12/15
grant Zernik the Motions and Requests, which are part of the Intervention.
For the reasons detailed in 1-3, above, the Court should grant just and equitable
remedies, pursuant to the law of the United States, as detailed below (L. PRAYER FOR
RELIEF), for Zemik, for Log Cabin Republicans, for the USA, and for all who are
similarly situated under the 9th Circuit.
J. CLAIMS
Zemik's claims pertaining to the litigation of Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550)
and litigation of Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (2:04-cv-8425) in the US District
Court, Central District of California, are:
1. As detailed in the 3: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate in re: Zernik v Connor et aI, it
is claimed that all clerical and judicial records in the PACER docket, including, but
not limited to, the uncertified April 24, 2009 Judgment are null and void.
2. As detailed in 4: Motion for an Order to Show Cause in re: Log Cabin Republicans v
USA et aI, it is claimed that all clerical and judicial records in the PACER docket,
including, but not limited to, the uncertified October 12,2010 Judgment are null and
void.
3. As detailed in 5: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate in re: The NEFs are Public
Records, it is claimed that the NEFs are court records subject to the First Amendment
rights.
4. As detailed in 6: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate in re: The NEFs, as Drafted are
Invalid Certificates, it is claimed that the NEFs, as currently drafted, are invalid as
13/15
electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the Clerk, which undermine
Due Process rights.
5. As detailed in 7: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate: in re: CMlECF and the General
Order 08-02, it is claimed that establishment of CMlECF through the General Order
08-02 amounts to Deprivation of Rights.
K. CASE STATUS
1. Zemik is not a party to any litigation in any US or state court.
2. Appeals by Log Cabin Republicans and the USA filed Appeals under Log Cabin
Republicans v USA et al (10-56634 and 10-56813) are now pending at the US Court
of Appeals.
L. [PROPOSED] INTERVENOR ENTERS IDS REQUEST FOR
INTERVENTION AND PRAYER FOR RELIEF. '.
WHEREFORE [PROPOSED] INTERVENOR PRAYS this honorable Court issue just
and equitable relief, pursuant to the law ofthe United States, as follows:
1. Declaratory relief in entering the Mandate in re: Joseph Zernik v Jacqueline Connor
et al (2:08-cv-01550) - The uncertified April 24, 2009 Judgment in Zernik v
Connor et al was, is, and always will be void, not voidable.
2. Declaratory relief in entering the Order to Show Cause in re: Log Cabin Republicans
v USA et al (2:04-cv-08425) and the uncertified October 12, 2010 Judgment on USA
and Log Cabin Republicans - Why instant Appeals should not be dismissed for lack
ofjurisdiction and/or mootness;
14/15
3. Declaratory relief in entering the Mandate on the US District Court: The NEFs are
court records subject to the First Amendment rights;
4. Declaratory relief in entering Mandate: The NEFs, as currently drafted, are invalid as
electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the Clerk; the US District
Court shall immediately draft valid electronic certificates of authentication/
attestation by the Clerk;
5. Declaratory relief in entering the Mandate: Establishment of CMlECF in the US
District Court through the General Order 08-02 amounts to Deprivation of Rights.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Joseph Zernik respectfully asks the Honorable Court to grant
him such declaratory, injunctive, mandate and other relief as it deems just and proper,
pursuant to the law of the United States.
December 27th, 2010, by:
Joseph Zernik
).~ ).7:0--
By: _
Joseph Zernik, PhD
[Proposed} Intervenor, In Pro Se
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
15/15
M. STATEMENT OF VERIFICATION
I, Joseph Zernik, read instant 1: Request for Leave to File, Notice to Reliably Inform
the Court and Motion to Intervene, and I know the content thereof to be true and
correct, it is true and correct based on my own personal knowledge, except as to those
matters therein stated as based upon information and belief, and as to to those matters, I
believe them to be true and correct as well.
I make this declaration that the foregoing is true and correct under penalty of peIjury
pursuant to the laws of California and the United States.
Executed on December 27 th , 2010.
Joseph Zemik
16/15
EXHIBITS
. - ..
; .
! .
!
EXHIBIT 1:1
December 12,2010 Notice of Intent to Intervene and Request to Confer in

Appeals in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et ai, forwarded to parties in the
Appeals, and confirmations of receipt.
1) Notice and Request to Confer
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:59:07 +0200

To: anthony.steinmeyer@usdoj.gov, august.flentje@usdoj.gov,
henry.whitaker@usdoj.gov, dwoods@whitecase.com, emiller@whitecase.com,
aakahn@whitecase.com
From: joseph zernik <jz12345@earth1ink.net>
Subject: Timely Response Requested within 7 days. RE: Log Cabin Republicans
v USA (10-56634), (l0-56813) - Notice ofIntent to Intervene and Request to
Confer
December 12, 2010
Response within 7 days is requested
Log Cabin Republicans v USA (10-56634), (10-56813)

a. Counsel for the Defendants/Appellants
(202) 514-3388
(202) 514-3309
(202) 514-3180
b. Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee
(213) 620-7772
(213) 620-7785
(213) 620-7751
White & Case LLP
TO COUNSEL FOR LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS AND USA:
Please accept instant Notice of Intent to Intervene and Request to Confer by

Joseph Zemik,PhD, an Individual, on his own behalf, on behalf of Human Rights

Alert (NGO) and All Who Are Similarly Situated.
Dr Zemik has previously filed a request with Counsel for Log Cabin Republicans,
with Counsel for USA, and with Clerk Terry Nafisi, US District Court, Central
District for California, to access the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) in Log
Cabin Republicans v USA et al (2:04-cv-08425).
No response to the request has been received from any of those requestees.
Absent access to the NEFs in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (2:04-cv-08425)

at the US District Court, the preponderance of the evidence indicates that the
litigation involved no valid or effectual judicial records, only null and void ones.
Therefore, it is likely that upon review it would be determined that the US Court
of Appeals, 9th Circuit, has no jurisdiction in this matter and/or that the Appeals
in this matter are moot.
Dr Zemik requests to confer with Counsel for Log Cabin Republicans and USA in
this matter at their earliest convenience, so that he need not burden the US Court
of Appeals, 9th Circuit.
In order to expedite the resolution of this request, Dr Zernik will accept

communications by email from Counsel for Log Cabin Republicans and USA,
and is likewise requesting that the two parties accept email communications in
this matter.
Confirmation of receipt by return of email is kindly requested.
Dated: December 12,2010
Joseph Zernik, PhD

).~
BY: JosephZernik, PhD
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
TEL: (323) 521-6209
Case: 10-56634 01/07/2011 Page: 26 of 29 10: 7604298 OktEntry: 39
2) December 13, 2010 Confirmation of Receipt by Attorney Anthony

Steinmeyer (USDOJ)
Subject: Read: Timely Response Requested within 7 days. RE: Log Cabin
Republicans v USA (10-56634), (l0-56813) - Notice of Intent to Intervene and
Request to Confer
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:43:25 -0500
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Tbread-Topic: Timely Response Requested within 7 days. RE: Log Cabin
Republicans v USA (10-56634), (10-56813) - Notice of Intent to Intervene and
Request to Confer
Thread-Index: AcuZ2xUh2yn70GYxRme58utNN7b12gBCcd70
From: "Steinmeyer, Anthony (CIV)" <Anthony.Steinmeyer@usdoj.gov>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Dec 2010 16:44:20.0206 (UTC)
FILETIME=[FD3D38EO:01 CB9AE4]
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure
engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-13_07:201 0-12-
13,2010-12-13,1970-01-01 signatures=O
engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 defmitions=20 10-12-13_07:2010-12-
13,2010-12-13,1970-01-01 signatures=O
X-ELNK-AV: 0
X-ELNK-Info: sbv=O; sbrc=.O; sbf=OO; sbw=OOO;
Your message
To: Steinmeyer, Anthony (CIV); Flentje, August (ClY); Whitaker, ",

Henry (ClY); dwoods@whitecase.com; emiller@whitecase.com;
Cc:
Subject: Timely Response Requested within 7 days. RE: Log Cabin
Republicans v USA (10-56634), (10-56813) - Notice of Intent to
Intervene and Request to Confer
Sent: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 03:59:07 -0500
was read on Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11 :43 :25 -0500
Final-Recipient: RFC822; asteinme@CIV.USDOJ.GOV

Disposition: automatic-action/MDN-sent-automatically; displayed
X-MSExch-Correlation-Key: mocaizoJmUuxV/xzy2Foqg=
3) December 12,2010 Confirmation of Receipt by Attorney August Flentje

(USDOJ)
Subject: Read: Timely Response Requested within 7 days. RE: Log Cabin Republicans v
USA (10-56634), (10-56813) - Notice of Intent to Intervene and Request to Confer
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:25:54 -0500
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Corre1ator:
Thread-Topic: Timely Response Requested within 7 days. RE: Log Cabin Republicans v
USA (10-56634), (10-56813) - Notice of Intent to Intervene and Request to Confer
Thread-Index: AcuZ2xSLCp/Ni2vYQ4KcOa05zqqsJQARozVr
From: "Flentje, August (CIV)" <August.F1entje@usdoj.gov>
To: "joseph zernik" <jz12345@earthlink.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Dec 2010 17:25:54.0000 (UTe)
FILETIME=[A13E3DOO:01CB9A21]
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000
definitions=2010-12-12_05 :2010-12-1 0,2010-12-12, 1970-01-01 signatures=O
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000
definitions=2010-12-12_05:2010-12-1 0,20 10-12-12, 1970-01-01 signatures=O
X-ELNK.-AV: 0
X-ELNK.-Info: sbv=O; sbrc=.O; sbf=OO; sbw=OOO;
Your message
To: Steinmeyer, Anthony (CIV); F1entje, August (CIV); Whitaker,

Henry (CIV); dwoods@whitecase.com; emiller@whitecase.com;
Subject: Timely Response Requested within 7 days. RE: Log Cabin
Republicans v USA (10-56634), (10-56813) - Notice of Intent to
Intervene and Request to Confer
Sent: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 03:59:07 -0500
was read on Sun, 12 Dec 201012:25:54 -0500
Final-Recipient: RFC822; AFlentje@CIV.USDOJ.GOV

Disposition: automatic-action/MDN-sent-automatically; displayed
X-MSExch-Correlation-Key: YrneZXEflE2ybNZgHHS3pA=
Original-Message-ID: <E1PRhnW-0007fs-Ea@elasmtp-curtai1.at1.sa.earthlink.net>
N. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned Joseph Zernik, served the documents described as 1: Request for
Leave to File, Notice to Reliably Inform the Court, and Notice of Motion and Motion
to Intervene on parties in this action by depositing a true copy thereof, which was
enclosed in a sealed envelope, with postage fully prepaid in the United States Mail,
addressed as follows:
a. Counsel for United States of America

(202) 514-3309
(202) 514-3388
(202) 514-3180
b. Counsel for Log Cabin Republicans

(213) 620-7751
'.
(213) 620-7785
(213) 620-7772
White & Case LLP
Los Angeles, CA 90071
c. US District Court, Central District of California

Terry Nafisi, Clerk (terry_nafisi@cacd.uscourts.gov)
Dawn Bullock, Records Supervisor (dawn_Bullock@cacd.uscourts.gov)
(213) 894-4727
US District Court, Central District of California
312 N. Spring Street
I certify and declare, under penalty of peljury under the laws of the United
States of America and the State of California, that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Executed on December 27 th , 2010,

Joseph H Zernik
).~
By: _
Joseph Zemik, PhD
[Proposed] Intervenor, In Pro Se
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
RECEIVED
US COlJRT OF ApoFlILS
FILED _
Case No 10-56634 and 10-56813
DOCKETED _-::-:::::--_ _ -::=-:-
DATE INITIAL
IN THE UNIED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCillT

vs
; ---
j
United States of America; Robert M Gates, j'

~ .
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ".
2: INTERVENOR DR JOSEPH ZERNIK'S REQUEST FOR LENIENCE AS

A PRO SE FILER
Joseph Zemik, PhD Digitally signed

In Pro Se by Joseph Zernik
2231 South Court, Palo Alto, CA 94301 DN: cn=Joseph
~.. IJ Zernik, 0, ou,
Telephone: (323) 521-6209 ) . ~L. email=jz12345@e
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
jz12345@earthlink.net ";>;/ arthlink.net, c=US
Date: 2010.12.27
f/ ~ 14<&" .0,,,,,
2: INTERVENOR DR JOSEPH ZERNIK'S VERIFIED REQUEST FOR
LENIENCE AS A PRO SE FILER
TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND TO PARTIES: Intervenor Joseph Zernik
("Zernik") herein requests the Court for Lenience as a pro se filer.
1. United States law provides lenience for pro se tllers.
Zemik requests the Court's lenience for his "inariful pleading", [ 1] as accorded by US
law to pro se filers. In particular, Zemik is not qualified in assessing the validity of legal
theories. He therefore asks the Court to ignore any irrelevant or erroneous legal theory
that he might claim, and to take into consideration the facts themselves, as well as the
claims, if they can be supported by some other valid legal theory. [2]
2. Sections of the code were often left unspecified.
For such reasons, routine use has been made in the Motion to Intervene and adjoining
records oflanguage implying violations of the law or claiming rights by law, while
specific sections of the code and case law were not cited.
III
III
III
III
III
III
1 Erickson v Pardus et at, 06-7317 (Sup. Ct., Jun. 4, 2007)

2Haddock v California Board of Dental Examiners, US Crt App 9th Cire, Nov 26,1985; 777 F.2d
462
2/5
2: REQUEST FOR LENIENCE AS A PRO SE FILER
,! .
3. Therefore, Zernik respectfully requests that the Court accord him lenience as a
pro se filer, pursuant to US law.

J.
For all the reasons listed in paragraphs 1-2, above, the Court should accord Zemik
lenience as due to pro se filers, pursuant to the law of the United States.
By:
).~ _
),17--
JOSEPH ZERNIK
Intervenor, In Pro Se
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
jzI2345@earthlink.net
STATEMENT OF VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned, Joseph Zernik, read the Intervenor's 2: Verified Request for
Lenience as a Pro Se Filer, and I know the content thereof to be true and correct, it is
true and correct based on my own personal knowledge, except as to those matters therein
stated as based upon information and belief, and as to those matters, I believe them to be
true and correct as well.
I make this declaration that the foregoing is true and correct under penalty of perjury
pursuant to the laws of the United States.
Executed on December 2ih, 2010.
).~
Joseph Zemik
3/5
, .
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned Joseph Zernik, served the documents described as: 2: Request for
Lenience as a Pro Se Filer on parties in this action by a) emailing, and b) by mailing a
true copy thereof, which was enclosed in a sealed envelope, with postage fully prepaid,

(202) 514-3309
(202) 514-3388
(202) 514-3180
950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Room 7256 ! .

(213) 620-7751
(213) 620-7785
(213) 620-7772
White & Case LLP

(213) 894-4727
US District Court, Central District of California
III
III
III
III
III
III
4/5
I certify and declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United
correct.
Executed on December 27 th , 2010,
Joseph Zernik
).~
')(;-
By: _
JOSEPH ZERNIK
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
5/5
RECEIVED
U.S COURT OF APPEALS
Case Nos 10-56634 and 10-56813 FILED ---

DOCKETED _-:::==--__ ..,.,,=.,-
DATE INITIAL
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

vs

o ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

? FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3: INTERVENOR DR JOSEPH ZERNIK'S MOTION FOR A

DECLARATORY MANDATE IN RE: ZERNIK V CONNOR ET AL -
THE UNCERTIFIED APRIL 24, 2009 JUDGMENT WAS, IS, AND
ALWAYS WILL BE VOID, NOT VOIDABLE.
Joseph Zernik, PhD

Digitally signed
InProSe by Joseph Zernik
ON: cn=Joseph
2231 South Court Zernik. 0, OU,
Palo Alto, CA 94301 ).~ email=jz1234S@
earthlink.net,
Telephone: (323) 521-6209 c=US
Facsimile (213) 261-9881 Date: 2010.12.27
14:49:28 +02'00'
3: MOTION FOR A DECLARATORY MANDATE: THE UNCERTIFIED
APRIL 24, 2009 JUDGMENT IN ZERNIK V CONNOR ET AL WAS, IS, AND
ALWAYS WILL BE VOID, NOT VOIDABLE.
TO THE COURT AND TO PARTIES: Intervenor Dr Joseph Zernik ("Zernik") herein
files his Motion for a Declaratory Mandate: The uncertified April 24, 2009 Judgment In
Zernik V Connor et al was, is, and always will be void, not voidable.
,
I
1. The concomitantly filed papers should be deemed integral parts ofinstant motion. ,i! ..
,i.:..
The following papers are concomitantly filed under separate covers, as integral parts ;.
of instant motion:
,.
l,:·
I: Request for Leave to File, Notice to Reliably Inform the Court, and Motion to i
Intervene;
3: Motion for Declaratory Mandate: The uncertified April 24, 2009 Judgment in
Zernik v Connor et al was, is, and always will be void, not voidable.
4: Motion for an Order to Show Cause on Log Cabin Republicans and the USA in
re: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al - Why instant Appeals should not be
dismissed for lack ofjurisdiction and/or mootness;
5: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs (Notices of Electronic Fling) are
court records subject to the First Amendment rights;
6: Motion for Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs are invalid as electronic certificates
of authentication/attestation by the Clerk, the US District Court shall immediately
draft valid electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the Clerk;
2/6
7: Motion for Declaratory Mandate: The establishment of PACER and CMlECF
through the General Order 08-02 of the US District Court amounts to Deprivation
o/Rights;
2. The NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing) of judicial and clerical records in Zernik
v Connor et al were discovered on December 29, 2009. j.
On December 29, 2009 (eight months after the issuance of the Judgment in Zernik v
Connor et ai), following repeated efforts, Zernik did manage to access the electronic
certificates of authentication! attestation by the Clerk (NEFs) (Exhibits 3:1-4).
The March 5,2009 Complaint (Dkt #001) was apparently docketed with a valid NEF,
including a valid 'electronic document stamp' and 'Filer' name - 'Joseph Zemik' .
(Exhibit 3:1)
3. The NEFs of all judicial and clerical records in Zernik v Connor et ai, which were I
I
j- .
discovered on December 29, 2009, were invalid without exception.
On December 29,2009, a total of twenty-four (24) NEFs were discovered, sixteen "
(16) of which pertained to judicial and clerical records. (Exhibit 3:2,3,4)
All sixteen (16) judicial and clerical records, whose NEFs were discovered, were
docketed with patently invalid NEFs: No 'electronic document stamp', which is required
j.
in a valid NEF, pursuant to the General Order 08-02, [1] and no 'Filer' name is found in
any of the NEFs for the sixteen (16) judicial and clerical records.
'j
1For ease of reference. a copy of the General Order 08-02 was posted at:
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/docl27632471/
!
3/6
The sixteen (16) judicial and clerical records, whose NEFs were discovered, and
which were 'entered' in the PACER docket, while patently invalid NEFs were issued by
the office of the Clerk are:
a) Dkt # Unnumbered - March 5, 2008 Issuance of Summonses;
b) Dkt #04 - March 5, 2008 Notice of Reference to a US Magistrate;
c) Dkt #09 - March 6, 2008 Reassignment to a US Judge (Exhibit 3:2);
d) Dkt # 10 - March 7, 2008 Referral to a US Magistrate;
e) Dkt # 14 - March 21, 2008 Minutes by US Judge, denying the Request for
Temporary Restraining Order;
f) Dkt #27 - March 31,2008 Minutes by US Magistrate;
g) Dkt #33 - April 18, 2008 Minutes by US Magistrate;
h) Dkt #57 - May 15,2008 Minutes by US Magistrate;

.
i) Dkt #63 - June 6, 2008 Minutes by US Magistrate;
j) Dkt #70 - June 6, 2008 Minutes by US Magistrate;
k) Dkt #77 - June 6, 2008 Minutes by US Magistrate;
1) Dkt #102 - March 18, 2009 Order by US Judge;
m) Dkt #103- March 31, 2009 Notice by US Magistrate;
n) Dkt #104 - March 31, 2009 Report & Recommendation by US Magistrate;
0) Dkt # 106 - April 24, 2009 Order by US Judge;
p) Dkt #107 - April 24, 2009 Judgment by US Judge. (Exhibit 3:3)
I.
4/6
4. The Clerk of the US District Court has refused to certify the PACER docket in
Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550).
Regardless of repeated requests, the Clerk of the US District Court has refused to
certify the online PACER docket.

f.
5. The Court should deem conduct of the litigation in Zernik v Connor et al as
denial of Constitutional and Civil rights
Conduct of the litigation of Zernik v Connor et al in the US District Court, Central

,! .
District of California, should be deemed by the Court as denial of Access to the Courts,
Equal Protection, Due Process, andlor First Amendment rights.
6. Therefore, the US Court of Appeals, 9 th Circuit, is respectfully requested to
enter a Mandate in re: Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) - The uncertified
April 24, 2009 Judgment in Zemik V Connor et al was, is, and always will be
void, not voidable.
For the reasons listed in paragraphs 1-5, above, the Court should enter the Mandate in
re: Zernik v Connor et al: The uncertified April 24, 2009 Judgment in Zernik V Connor et
al was, is, and always will be void, not voidable.
Dated: December 27th, 2010 Joseph Zernik
By: _
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
jz l2345@earthlink.net
5/6
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Motion for a Mandate in re: Zernik v Connor et ale
Exhibit 3:1 - Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550):

a) March 5, 2009 Complaint (Dkt #001) (face page), and
b) The respective NEF, bearing the 'electronic document stamp', as required by
General Order 08-02 for valid electronic certificate of authentication/attestation
a) March 7,2008 Order Returning Case for Reassignment (Dkt #009). and
Exhibit 3:3 -Zernikv Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550):
a) Apri124, 2009 Judgment (Dkt #107), and
a) Table form summary ofNEFs' validity, or lack thereof, and
b) Compiled NEFs of Judicial, and Clerical Records, as obtained from the office of
the Clerk on December 29, 2009.
I, the undersigned, Joseph Zemik, read instant Intervenor's 3: Verified Motion for a
Mandate in re: Zernik v Connor et ai, and I know the content thereof to be true and
correct, it is true and correct based on my own personal knowledge, except as to those
matters therein stated as based upon information and belief, and as to those matters, I
believe them to be true and correct as well.
Executed on December 27th , 2010.
Joseph Zemik
6/6
EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 3:1
Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 1 Filed O~05/2008
{\'-0
Prge 1 of 23
f\\""E.U
,
: :
,
i '"
Joseph Zernik
2 2415 Saint George St.
Los Angeles, California
3 Tel: (310) 4359107 1~o;!..1
4 Fax: (801) 998 0917
Plaintiff
5 in pro per
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10 DEMAND FOR JURy TRIA~V IAF0AIU.'
11
\., 0 a·- 1 5 5 0 - '1 \[' "II
; .
12 Joseph Zernik, Docket # _
Plaintiff VERIFIED COMPLAINT
13
vs. CIVIL RIGHTS
14
.Jacqueline Connor, Anan Goodman, John Segal,
15 Linda Hart-Cole, Patricia Collins, Terry Friedman,
16 and Gerald Rosenberg -
individually and in hislher official capacity as Judge of
17 the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, West
18 District
and
19 Debbie Witts -
20 individually and in her official capacity as Court
Manager, Civil Unlimited, the Superior Court ofLos
21 Angeles Country, West District
22 and
Vivian Jaime -
23 individually and in her official capacity as Courtroom
24 Clerk, Department I, the Superior Court of Los
25 Angeles Country, West District
and
26 Retired Judge Gregory O'Brien-
27 individually and in his capacity as Proposed Referee,
and
28 ADR Services, Inc -
-1-
ZERNIK v JUDGES OF THE LA SUPERIOR COURT ET AL
I
I...
I
I
- California Central District - Display Receipt https:f/ecfcacd.circ9.dcn/cgi-bin/DisplayReccipLpl?9J 741 9357808 ...
t1IME-Ver:si.on::i. 0
rt'om: cacd ecfmai!@c<1cd.l..,scou'rts .gc;v
'l'~): (~cf.nef~ca.Gd.uscou::ts. gov
i-1essage- rd: <$48 L039(otcacd. uscourr.s. g<w>
Bee: CRD...,FeeSS@CaGd.u;;courts.90v, crm....Nagle@cacd.H!:H::curts.go..•
~3ubject:Act:ivityir. Case 2;Oij-cv-01550"(;AP-MAN ,Joseph 7.e('nik v. Jacqueline Connor e:: <11 C'ornpla,int - (i~ef:en:r:;d)
Cenr.eJit··Type: t.ext"./plainH"NO'rl-!~ TO ?llBr,rC ACCESS USF.:H.S~** You may view the £ i.lr:!d doc,umen:;.s once without char'qe. To avo,~.d IM:e:r cha:::ges, download
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. CENTRAL DISTRICT CY CA::~['C.~R.NrA
No::ice of Electr0l11C Fil.i.:lg

;~e ~;~;;~;~ng t.:(,)r:sact i.on wa.s ente:red on 3/7/2008 "3; 55 AM PS'I aJ~d f i l.ed
ClSe Name: Joseph Ze:rnik v. Jacqueline' Connor er. al

Case Number: 2:08··c.v··1~·50 ht.tps://ecf.<:acd.llscourts gov!cgi··bin/UktRpt.pl,??G9<;llH
F.i Ie:::: tJ0seph zeI:n'ut
DOCilmen t. (,sumbe-r:
!,
Copy the URI.. address from thf1 lwe helow into the loc~t.i.on ba:r ,:>t your wei)
browser ::0 view t:he document.: htt.ps: / tf:!.cf. cacd. uscourts. govj':Q'i ~b.i.n/show_C~;5e_d()c?1., 409'JlB, ,/I'1AGIC, , ,)7
Docket. Text:
Cm1PLAINT filed against: Defendantsl.. ind-a Hart.-Cole(11er official capacity as
.Judge ot the S,-\pel·icr Cour-t of Los Angeles County. :;<:e~1:. Disr.d_ct.l, Patricia
C-.111. i!ls Ondi 'Jidua.lly}, Pat:- ic.i.a Col L.ns (his/he:- off:ic~a.l capa.city as Judge.
of: the super.ior- CO~}r-t of 1Jos A.'1geles C:Ol.lnt.y, West Dis~rictj, 'l'e1'.r.y l"rieoman(individual1y).
;~:~~:-~n~~t=~n~~~\;~~~:;t~~s~f;i~~~~ c~~:a_~~~~l~SR~~~~~e~~(t~~i;~~_::~;~:'f;)~o~~~a~~
Rosenberg (his/her. offieial cap.:ic.l;:y as- Judge of the 8~lpe.r:~,cr CClllrt. of 1.,,05
Ar:.geles Count.y. West Dist.d.ct), Deb.b:Le: ~'1it.t:s(il1divi.du~l1.y), DE~bb!.e W:i.t[${.in
~~rL~;f~~:ie~ag~~;~~y~sW~~~r~i:~~~~~~": ~~~1~:nU~;~~;~t~di~7~u:~ti~f;O~i~~~~r.
Jair~e!in her :)!:fic.i.al capaci.ty iiS Courtr.oom Clerk, D€'{)ar.tmenl~ X, the SlJpe:r.:ior.-
COurt of Los Angeles Country ~ West". Dis:trict). Gregory; 0' Bl·ien.Rer:..lrred
~Tudge. ind.1.vi.dually), G:t.-ego:cy O'Brien('Rel:irea ,Judge i.:;1_ his capaC.:.ty
as P:t·(.)po~H!d Refe-:rrei, ADR sel-v.Leesj 1t::<":. las a co~·p{)r~l~;lon), ~nR Dervlces,
Inc_ (and its capaCity as neutral provider that employ~d RetirHd ~)'Brien).
David pascernilk.(individually}, David Pasternak-Ci.n hlS:.O.U::i.(:i~:. capacity as
Receiver in $amaan v :::ernik {SCOS7"'00iJ. Angelo Mozil¢dinctividually), AngELlO
Mozi 10 (in cheir capaci ties as Officers: of COllntryl,ro'ide' Financi(tl corporat'.ior.. ),
Sandor Samuelslindividuallyl. Sandor Samuels/in the.i.r:capacit:-.es as Otricer's
;:If Countrywide P~.nanc::.ial corpo:-at,'ioil) ,; Ccn.ult:r.y,...::.de Home r,oans, Iw::., M<:\ra
Escrow company, Dm:;, ,Jacqueline Connor: (indi vidually) . : Jacquel:"ne Connor. (he'!.-
offir.;ial ,:apacity ilS Judge of the superior' Cou:r::t of L?S Angel(~s (~o~mt.y, We:H.
District) j Allan Good;nan{individuallyr, Allan Good:nardilis offi.ci'il capacit'l
as Judge of t.he Supe:Cior Cour:·t of 1..06 Angeles County,. West Di:n:r-lct), John
segal (individually}) Joh.n Segal (his offi(.:ial capacity as Juug<.:' oJ the Supe:t'io:r.
Court of. L.os Angeles CO.. .lnty. ;'Iest: Distr-:tct.l, Linea Haf:t-Cole(~nd.ividually)
Case assigned ;;0 Judge Gary A. Feess and n:f.erred to t1<l9"i$tr·a~~e ,;udge Margaret
A. Nagle (Filing ~r.~e$350 PAID.), filed by !':L~,;i!1tiff ,joseph Z'~rnj.k.
{et)
2. GlJ-cv··1~;50 Not~~ce has b(Hm elect:-cr.ically maildd tc:
2:0awcvwJ.s~;o Notice has been delivered: by First Cla.ss' 0_ S. K,iiL or hy

fax to:
Joseph Ze:-nix
241S Saint Geo:r-ge Street
Los Angeles, C~ 90027
The following docu:nent. !s) ar.ea~rsoc:ia!J~rJ with this t.:ra,nsacticH:

Document description: M~lir:. Document
Original filename: M:\CV Case OP9\LA{)aCV1550GA11··~1A.'Il··).9B3.pdf
F..l~c;:ronif; d,-~C;J!l':er:t St.'lli9:
[STA."1P c.ar;dStamP.JD" 1(l202:J0914 (Date-~3/7ilooa] [Pi le-Numbe::.-,.SHt 103B - 0] [36b7e25217b9J5cdcbc1748dGS875ffc938e96df4c.b91GbaSa'l5babOO:)3c3 fS]e4[le2claO
lof! 12/29/20093:57 PM
EXHIBIT 3:2
Case 2:08~cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 9 Filed 03/07/2008 Page 1 of 1
fllEO
ctERIC. U.S. DISTRICT COYRT
BY
I--ralll
CENTRAL OIs1liiCT Of CAl..IfORNIA
J....... DEPUTY
i
.\
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i·
I
Joseph amik
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NliMBER
I
Jacqueline COMOr. el 8/
v.
PtA IN'TIFflSl
CV 08-1550 JSL (MANx)
I i"
ORDER RETURNING CASE i
FOR REASSIGNMENT
IT IS ORDERED that the above-entitled case is hcrebyrcmmed to the Clerk for random reassignment
pursuant lQ the provisions ofGeneral Order No. 07.()2 •
~((o{,.-o6~_ _ 1St J. Spcncer1..<:lUl

Dute . United States District Judge
NOTICE TO COUNSEL FROM CLERlC
This case has been CClIssigned lQ Judge VirginiaA. Phillips for all funhor proceedings.
On all documents subsequently filed in tbis case, please substitute the initials VAP after the case
number in pla<:e urthe inilial.s of the prior judge so that thoccase number will ~ CV 08·1550 VAP (MANx) .
This is very impOt'tant because documents arc routed to tbeassignedjudgeby means of the initials. The case
file, nnder seal documents; exhibits, docket; transcripts or depositions may be viewed at the:
!if Western o
Southern 0 £aslem DivisiOn.
.~
Subsequent dOlluments must be filed at the' 0 Western 0 Southern 0 Ea$fern Ilivi$ion.

Failure to file at the proper Jocation wUl rml't in )tout documents being returned to you.
ORDER RIlTl!RS1NG CAS~ fOR REASSIGNMENT

C-V·ft9 (061)7)
- California Central Dislrict - Display Receipt hnps://ceEcacd.circ9.dcnlcgi-biniDisplayRcccipl.pl?202529264018...
i'4tKl~-v~l[ .. iOJt: 1."

r:otatC;)C4_~t~slk.led.uao:nort.··90Y
1'c~e~tt\ot~bed.:.ll'cou=t __ 9QV
::i~$BA9f: .. td :<S46~5211.c",cd.uecourtlll .."JOv>:
Plcc~caaea'lJn_ee·.:n.doe~3r.d.u.COurt:~·9()\l'. r.~t~~ed..<::I.tC:9.dcG. r..f~ ..oc1.dtc~.rlcn . .c:"d_-'.t.t-(;3Ca(:d.t<a:C;:<fIJ.rt".t;JQv
JQlfe;sb :;ttrft1Jt
241S 31iif.lt (H,orge Sl;.::'«t.
loOlJ ~J.geJ-fl' c.0A. ')002.'1
OS
!hH·J'j~\:::A.ctiv~ty hl CUft Z:CS·~V~OlSSO·VAP·t"..ANJl'>C~b !t>rnf.k '1(. ",..C'q;l,!l!U,,« (,"'oJlnQr et ~l ~2. Rot~n:·r.b'l C.:t:t". tor ·~~lJ-r.i~r. vIi divil!Uc>t't. {C." a'B
co.rl"tem:.·T'y'poo~ t-ext./pU.ht .. ··NOTB: 10 PlJ~I.LIf: A(;CK"J$ u$g~:1"" Yfro s..sy v1~ toNe Cited dC<:\\nMt.* br:,€:e 'llI'1thQut, .;h(tl;"l$ft. TO avo~d l.lilt:<tr !;;r.ar<J~t. ~~,",,11()atJ;
t,mI1'1!tl S":"J,.'tP,-S. D:rSnt I (,:1" (""OOJi"t', (I'KTJUU> tn:sn::cr CF CALU'OJIN1A
!'k)Uco ()f Rhlctl'Onlc JlU1r.g ,
The' t"H"v1nq trar.~C't1()n 'Os enuu:ed ,1>:'1 iI':tnti03.1Ci11 M f~!T b'l'ld U1r.d
(it' V';j'J;cea
CiHIO t*<l;tI:'o:e: Jclt~h %ltt'nik' tJ. JUC(;\lelina!cen.-w::: H al
Ciil1e N~~: '::O."cv·1S~O t+\:.tp.. :II~t.¢aed,u~CC>'~t::t;1Lgovht.tp~;IIft,.r;t.<:~~.~:(1\lrO;:A.!Jov/(';<1t~l>::.(tjDi::tR~t'i>n40,}9HJ
rHer:
D1"C'1;~t ~i)ttber: ,
Cctw the URI:. ~,<Mre:H' t:c(),;~ the H:H~ hEI....l~.., 1.l1tC the- If>e:at:::lon ba..- of y<lur: ~b
brow.&cr to vlev th" 4CK;'\1.~rl.l;: I , ;
Otx;ket, 'r~.. t ~ . ; .
C~D P...h"'1'UJl"Utt3 c~e 'OR RnA'SStctodtm' })y J"c4!1~,J B;>er~er ~.t.t" OJu:n e.....
r6~t::ned t..6 t~O Cl()r" to"" .t;l;n<!M. r'~Ul9'l)"~Ms,; pul:'ll.u«nt- [.Q G'~er&l Qt:~ O?'·!)l.
CUe :;.l'J~ly t"~!I$...rgf'lt'<t l:~·Jod{ff1 J~ 8~fJ':\«r t,.()tn to J'uCq.c ~I'9~nlb A.
Phllli';)u tOT ... 1) lunhlitr p.t()(;e~1n'1~. ,-:to QIJO ~I:: vill tlO" rli:Chct: tU
~~~~~~;~'l~;Ot~~i~~n~:t"~l":t:Cf:O:~~~.~~~:r'l=~;" (rn)
"2:()6~ev·l~SO »Otic.~ . . ~etII d.H,.,.&radih1 Pluc·Clua .a~ $ . . . 1.1 ~:by
fax tOI ; ,
;!:,¢:&e.;>b 'ktnlk
:241$ S4'~Gt G(torqo at-CHI-
!oQ& A.l'lJel e. CA ;002:1
us
I of 1 12/29/20094:01 PM
EXHIBIT 3:3
Case: 10-56634 01/06/2011 Page: 15 of 52 ID: 7604312 DktEntry: 41 . ......:.... -
Case 2:08-cv-01550-VAP-CW Document 107 Filed 04/24/2009 Page 1 of 1
3
:.
i
4

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12 JOSEPH ZERNIK, No. CV 08-1550-VAP(CW)

13 Plaintiff, JUDGMENT
14 v.
15 JACQUELINE CONNOR, et al.,
16 Defendants.
17
18 IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice as to

19 Plaintiff's damages claims under federal law and without prejudice as
20 to his state law damages claims and his claims for equitable relief.
21
22 DATED: April 24, 2009
23
24
25 Unite
26
27
28
i.
- California Central District - Display Receipt hUps:/!ecfcacd.circ9.dcn!cgi-bin./DisplayReceipt.pl?552355744138...
r-n t'>1I'> ver.s ion: 1. 0

Fror.t:cacd_ecfmail@cacd.uscCl1rts.gov
To: eCfne(@cacd,uscourcs.gov
Message·· Id: .-.;76'J5612@cacd.uscourts. gov~
Bee: djp@paslaw.com , jenna.moldawsky@l;n:yancave.ccm • kdj,caxlo@cfl1da·~law.c{)m , neftkacd.circ9.dcfl
, j ..... p@pasJ.aw.com, mwachtel10buchalt:er. com, soverton~cmda-law.com, crd...ptlillips@cacd:.uscoux'ts.gov, crd_phillips<,Hcacd. US::~0urts . gcy_sulll.ry , c)::d_.. .
Joseph ze:r:nik
2415 Saint Geot'ge St:ceet
Los Angeles CA 90027
US
Subject :Activity in ease 2:08~cv-(n550~VAP"CW~rosel-~h Z¢.?rnik v. Jacqueline Connor et al .judgment
Conterlt-'1'ype; text/pl-_3.in*HNOTE 1'0 PUBLIC ACCESS USERS;h"-;, The::::·"~ is no charge for viewip.(;J cpinioIl9.
UNT.'!'ED STATBS DIB'rR!CT COURT. CEN'!'RilII, DISTRICT OF f;At.IFOlmIA.
Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered on 4/24/2009 4:23 PM Pill' and f.iled
on '1/24/2009
Case" Name: Joseph zernik v. Jacqueline :Connor et al

Case Number.: 2: OU-cv-1550 htr.ps: IIe.er.. caed. useour::s .gov/cgi ··b::.n/D~<.tRpt.pl?409918
Filer:
WARNING: CASE CLOBED on 04/24/200!.l
Document Number: lC7 hr.tps: / leet. cacd uscourts .g0V;/doCl/0310~19173a7?ma9ic_num"'MAGIC&deTseq_n\.JflI:;;394&ca6eid:~409918
Copy the URL ':lddrt.!ss from the line belo·.... :i.ni:.O the location bar cf your- Web
browser t:o view the docUInent:: 10']
Docket Text:;
,JUDGr-1ENT by ~Tudge Vir~Jinia A. Phillips: IT IS ADJ1Jt>GED:tbat th:.s 'lct:.ion is
dismissed with prejud:1ce as to Plaintiffs damages c,laims under t:edex'al law
and. without prejudice as 1:0 hie state taw damages claims and hios r:laim9 for
equitable relief. (MD J$- 6", Case 'i'e:rfli!nated). !pclJ
2:oa-cv~1.5SC Ncti~e has been elecr:ronically mailed to:
~Tohn W Pat, ton jwp@pnslaw.<.:om
David J Pas::.ern.ak djp@paslaw.com
Michael L Wachtell mwachtell@b\,lchalce:r.com
Sarah L Overton SQvert.on@Cmda-law.ccm.
J enna v:eldawsky j E!nna. mcldaws,;";y@b"ryancave.Gom
Kathryn B DiCarlo ~:dica:t"lo@Cmda·"law.com
2: oa·-cv-1550 Notice has been delivered by Pirst Class U. S. Mail <:.r by

fax eo: :
~;oseph lernlk
241.5 Saint George S::.reet
US
lof] 12/29/20094:07 PM
j'-
EXHIBIT 3:4
09-12-29 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550): Table Form Summary of NEFs

(Notices of Electronic Filing) as received from the US District Court
, .
:.
Complaint was filed on March 5,2008 against some 10 judges of the Superior Court of Califomia, County
of Los Angeles, pursuant to Deprivation ofRights under the Color ofLaw - 42 USC § 1983. It was
further alleged that conduct of such judges and others, in collusion with Countrywide and Bank: of
America Corporation amounted to Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) pursuant
to 18 USC § 1961-1968.
Access to NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing) was pennitted only on Dec 29, 2009.
EDS - 'Electronic Doucment Stamp' as required by General Order 08-02 for a valid NEF.
Dkt # of the NEF ~U~~o I EDS rartles & t.:~unsel
listed as recip'ients of
Notes
Listed I Found NEF by email
[YIN] I [YIN]
i
,
1. DIet #01- March 6, 2008 Y Y None 1. EDS - incomplete I
Verified Complaint
I 2. Requesting clarification
by office of the clerk
I
I None
I
2. DIet # Unnumbered - N 1. Therefore - no valid andl
March 5, 2008 Issuance NI effectual summonses I
of Summonses
I were issued in this case I
3. DIet #04 - March 5, 2008 N N None 1. Therefore - No I
Notice of Reference to Magistrate had honest,
magistrate valid and effectual
authority in the case
I
I
4. DIet #05 - March 6, 2008 Y Iy None 1. RSA Sig - incomplete 1
I
Plaintiff Ex pate I 2. Requesting clarification
I
01I
Application for TRO
I by office of the clerk
r 5. oDIet #09 - March 6, 2008 Ni N
1· None 1. Therefore - recusal
I Reassignment to Judge I
I
Judge Letts was invalid
I
Virginia Phillips and ineffectual j
-
I
1
6
.
DIet #10 - March 7,2008
Referral to Magistrate
NI N None 1. Therefore- Recusal of
Magistrate Nagle was I
I Carla Woehrle I! invalid and ineffectual
I
.- .
, 7. DIet #14 - March 21,
Nl N 1. John W Patton • 1. March 21,2008 Minutes !
2008 Minutes by Judge jwp@paslaw.com
by Judge Virginia I
I Virginia Phillips, denying I, I
,I;
Phillips - de!1ying the
TRO were dishonest,
I
I
Request for TRO
I
iI 8. ! DIet #27 - March 31,
I1
N John W Patton
invalid and ineffectual. !
11. March 31, 2008 Minutes i
N
. II 2008
! Minutes by j~-p01paslaw.con1 I by Magistrate Carla
I
I
!
I Woehrle
Magistrate Carla
!
"""""mwachtel!@bucbalter.com
L W"","', Woehrle, ordering
Plaintiff to execute
-_ _... ---- I
L I
f I
Sarah L Overton
('I •• .... .-
Page 2/5
I I,
i I sovcrtonCQ).cmda-law.com Summonses were
dishonest, invalid, and
I ~. .
!
II 1
I I - I
N 1.
ineffectual
.1. April 18, 2008 Minutes
I
I
19. Dkt #33 - April 18, 20081 N John W Patton
I
Minutes by Magistrate
Carla Woehrle I II f·
jwp@paslaw,com
Michael L Wachtell
by Magistrate Carla
Woehrle, in re: Motion
II
I, , ,3.
rnwachtel1@buchalter.com
Sarah L Overton to Dismiss were
I soverton(alcmda-law.com dishonest, invalid, and
I10
I
I ineffectual.
Dkt #43 - POS for y Iy 1. John W Patton 1. EDS - incomplete
1 . jwpCdl.paslaw,corn
Summonses Returned i
! ~. Michael L Wachtell 2. Requesting clarification
I Executed
I
I
!
rnwachtel1Cii1buchalter.com
Sarah L Overton
soverton«l)cmda-law.com ~. Notice that such entry
I
I was in re: Summonses
I I
I
that were never
effectually issued.
I
II ~. Notice that such entry
I was in re: Summonses
I
I
I
that were adulterated by
Pro Se Clerk Chris I
I
!
Sawyer. I
N 1. May 15,2008 Minutes i
11. Dkt #57 - May 15, 2008
N I 1. John W Patton
jwp@paslaw,com
by Magistrate Carla I
Carla Woehrle
II I
!. Michael L Wachtell
Woehrle, in re: Ordering
I II
lllwachtellCiiJbuchalter.com
Sarah L Overton Plaintiff not to file
anything in court were I I
I soverton@cmda-law.com
dishonest, invalid, and I
I
I 12 Dkt #59 - May 22, 2008 Y 1.
ineffectual.
1. RSA Sig - incomplete
II
I
1 . Reply on Motion to Y John W Patton

jwpCiil,paslaw,com 1
Michael L Wachtell 7. Requesting clarification
I
Dismiss I mwachtcllCii1buchalter.com by office of the clerk I
II J
I
I
Sarah L Overton
soverton«l)cmda-Iaw.com I,,
I 13. Dkt #62 - First Y iy 1. John W Patton 1. RSA Sig - incomplete
i
II Amended Complaint i jwp@paslaw.com
Michael L Wachtell 12. Requesting clarification I
I
II mwachtell@buchalter.com by office of the clerk
I
! I
Sarah L Overton
so !
14 Dkt #63 - June 6, 2008 NI N 1. John W Patton
jwp@paslaw.com
1. June 6, 2008 Minutes by I
1 . Minutes by Magistrate i Magistrate Carla I
Carla Woehrle
Michael L Wachtell
Woehrle, in re: Finding i
I ~:
I mwachtell@buchalter.com
I Sarah L Overton Moot Plaintiff s Ex I

I sovertonCwcmda-law.com Parte Application for I
!
I i
I Reconsideration of June I
i
! II 6, 2008 Order not to file ii
I i
i anything in court were !!
I dishonest, invalid, and i
II l
I
, I - I ineffectual. i
i
Page 3/5
15. Dkt #68 - Motion to

dismiss First Amended IY iy 1. Kathryn E DiCarlo
kdicarloCillcmda-law.com
r. RSA Sig - incomplete
Complaint. I Ii ". Sarah L Overton

SOverton@cmda-law.com
"
Requesting clarification
John W Patton Jr
r..
I I f'
jwp@paslaw.com
Michael L wacbtell
mwaGhtell@buchalter.com
I
I
!I 6. Dkt #69 - Motion to
dismiss
Y IY 11.
Kathryn E DiCarlo
kdicarlo@cmda-law.com ~,
1. RSA Sig - incomplete
I
Q. Sarah L Overton . Requesting clarification
SOvertonCiilcmda-law.com by office of the clerk
John W Patton Jr I
i
t
4.
jwpC,v.paslaw.com
Michael L wacbtell
I
I mwaGhtell@buchalter.com
17. Dkt #70 - June 6, 2008
Carla Woehrle
NI N 1.
o.
Kathryn E DiCarlo
kdicarloCiilcmda-law.com
Sarah L Overton
1. June 6, 2008 Minutes by
Magistrate Carla
Woehrle, in re: Motions
I
I
SOverton@cmda-law.com
t
John W Patton Jr to Dismiss were
t
~.
jwp@paslaw.com
Michael L wachteU
mwaGhtellt<Vbuchalter.com
dishonest, invalid, and
ineffectual.
I
I
18. Dkt #77 - June 6, 2008 N N I. John W Patton 1. June 6, 2008 Minutes by
jwp@paslaw.com
Minutes by Magistrate Magistrate Carla
12.
Carla Woehrle
,, r .
Michael L wacbtell
mw"h"U@b"""I"".wm
Sarah L Overton
Woehrle, in re: Motions
to Dismiss were I
I I soverton@cmda-law.com dishonest, invalid, and I
I
i, 4. Jenna Moldawsky ineffectual. I
I Jenna.moldawsky@brvancave.com II
19. Dkt #102 - March 18,
I N N
fl·
I.
Kathryn E DiCarlo
kcticarlo@cmda-law.com
John W Pat ton 'I. March 18, 2009 Order by
!
I
I
2009 Order by Judge
Virginia Phillips II I
I
2.
jwp@pa.slaw.com
David J Pasternak
djp@paslaw.com
Judge Virginia Phillips,
denying Plaintiff S
!
I 3. Michael L wacbtell Request to Disqualify
Magistrate Carla
I 4.
mwachtell@buchalter.com
Sarah L Overton Woehrle for a cause was
I sovertol1@Cmda-law.com dishonest, invalid, and
I 5. Jenna Moldawsky j enna.
moldawsky@bryancave com
ineffectual. I
I
I
20. Dkt #103- March 31,

I
-
I N
6.
I.
Kathryn E DiCarlo
John WPatton 1. March 31,2009 Notice

I
2009 Notice by Nj jwp@paslaw.COlll

by Magistrate Carla
2. David J Pasternak
Magistrate Carla Woehrle of Filing R & R I
Woehrle
djpCii\paslaw.com
was dishonest, invalid, I
3.
4.
Michael L wacbtel]
Sarah L Overton
and ineffectual. I
soverton@cmda-law.com
5. Jenna Moldawsky
I
jemna.moidawsky@bryancave.com I
6. Kathryn E DiCarlo 1
kdicarlo@cmda-law.com I
1 2 1. Dkt #104 - March 31, N N I. John WPaUon 1. March 31,2009 R & R
I 2009 R&Rby jwpCiii.paslaw.colll
by Magistrate Carla
I! Magistrate Carla
2
1 .
David J Pasternak
djp@paslaw.com
Woehrle to Grant
Woehrle Motions to Dismiss was
I I 3
1 .
Micbael L Wacbtell
mwachtcl@buchalter.com dishonest, invalid, and
Page 4/5
I i 4. Sarah L Overton ineffectual.

sovertonCalcmda-law.com
I, 5. Jenna Moldawsky jenna.

moldawsky@bryancave.com
I,
I
I
I
i
6. Kathryn E DiCarlo
kdicarlo@cmda-Iaw.com
!
1 22 . Dkt #105 - April 9, 2009 Y iy 7. David J Pasternak
11. April 9, 2009 Plaintiff s
! Plaintiff s Requests I 8.
djp@paslaw.com
Jenna Moldawsky
Requests for Judicial
I Notice of Perverted I
I,
I
jenna.moldawsky@bryancave.com
9. John W Patton Jr
jwp@paslaw.collll
Discrepancy Procedures.
I 10. Kathryn E DiCarlo

kdicarlo(@,cmda·law.com
I
I
II. Michael L Wachtell
I 12. Sarah L Overton
i soverton@cmda-Iaw.com I
1
23 Dkt #106 - Apri124,
. 2009 Order by Judge
N N I. John W Patton
jwpCiiJ,paslaw.com r April 24, 2009 Order by
Judge Virginia Phillips,
I
Virginia Phillips 2. David J Pasternak
cljp@paslaw.com I Adopting R & R was
dishonest, invalid, and I
I
3. Michael L wachtell
mwachtell@buchalter.com ineffectual. I
I
I I 4.
Sarah L Overton
soverton(@cmda-Iaw.com
Jerula Moldawsky
I
I
I
jenna.moldawsky@brvancave.com ,I
5. Kathryn E DiCarlo
I kdicarlo@cmda-Iaw.com I
1 24 . Dkt #107 - April 24,
-
N N I. John W Patton 1. April 24, 2009 Judgment I
2009 Judgment by Judge I
I
jvm@paslaw.com
by Judge Virginia I
I
i
Virginia Phillips
II
2.
3.
David J Pasternak
cIjp@paslaw.com
Michael L wachtel)
Phillips, was dishonest,
invalid, and ineffectual. I
I mwachtell@buchalter.com
Sarah L Overton
I
I
I II 4.
sovertonCw.cmda-law.com
Jenna Moldawsky
I
jcnna.moldawsky@bryancavc.com
!
I 5. Kathryn E DiCarlo
i
Notes:
1. On December 29, 2009, upon appearance in person at the Office of the Clerk, Records Department,
request was filed for access to 24 out of over 100 records in Zemik v Connor et al.
2. On December 29,2009, upon appearance in person at the Office of the Clerk, Records Department,
Records Supervisor Dawn Bullock provided printouts for 24 out of 24 NEFs, which were requested
on that date.
3. None of the NEFs for 16 Judicial and clerical records contained the 'electronic document stamp' (EDS).
4. NEFs for the following critical records included no Electronic Document Stamp (EDS):
a. Issuance of Summonses
Page 5/5
b. Assignments and Reassignments to Judges

c. Assignments and Reassignments to Magistrates
d. All Minutes which were examined.
e. Order Denying Disqualification for a Cause
f. Notice and Report and Recommendation by Magistrate.
g. Order Adopting Report and Recommendation by Judge
h. Judgment by Judge.
5. Alll6 NEFs ofjudicial and clerical records in the table, included no "Filer" name.
1 d
f' Q,",~ Q. Q . ? I;~/
.Q. /-;
\'.;'
~t~ //..'
~ ev,""' f./~tlt'.
(...
'\ /." 4/·
Ii
"'rf
. ).~
"-
Joseph Zernik, DMD, PhD t""?I....~~"Mhy~.H~t't,..
tw:(,..,.j~phKl~\it,,4itU
..... :o'l.~jru:H·~f"<"lInNl" .....d.'..LJS
EQJ?PX ..?_f§L1,.C'):{f2:!Ilf.':J_S:-':6__.;l1l?..9":.J£i.)\:__~QJ . . ~_~I.3._~Q ~J. ?;.. . (·~rI!9jl:,_J~1~J.15.@.~!?~JIJ11!1ls.!:!~ lou~~"'tmI. CaI=I<;<"'U

mlr:ioOl12l'14;Gh4.14fJrtJ
TO Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the Court, US Court, Central District of Q~alitornia, Los Angeles
By hand delivery to Deputy-Clerk, at the public access depal1:rnent bf the court.
RE: (1) Zernik v Connor (2:08-cv-OI550), (2) Fine v Sh~lrijff (2:09-cv-01914), (3) In re: Fine 2:09-
me-OOl2!;), (4) US v City of LA et al (2:00-cv-l1769) reqilleststoaeeess court records
Dear Clerk Nafisi:
Please accept this note as a kindly request to access court necords, to inspect and to copy, pursuant to
Nixon v YVamer...Communications, Inc (1978). .
1) Request is to access the }>APER COURT FILES in the cases referenced above, to inspect and
to copy.
2) Request is to access the ELECTRONIC COURT FELES inCMJECF, to inspect and to copy
the NEFs.
3) In case no access is provided to the paper court file, under claim of shredding, request is for
access to respective SHREDDING RECORDS.
4) In case no access is provided to electronic court files in eM/ReF, request is for TRUE and
CORRECT COPlES OF' NEFs ONJLY (two exceptions, ~lear1y marked) of the following
records (no need for the records themselves):
Page 2/3 December 29, 2009
Dkt #69 _. motion to dismiss

Dkt #70···· minutes
I
Dkt #77 -- minutes

Dkt #102 - order
Dkt #103·· nodce ofR & R
Dkt #104 -- R8f; R
Dkt #105 notice
Dkt #I06 - R & R adopting
Dkt #J07 - judgment
b. .Fine v SheriJf (2:09-cv-ot914)
Dkt #01 ..- petition

Dkt #02 "- notice of reference
Dkt #03 ..- notice of clerical error
Dkt #04 ..- notrce of clerical error
Diet #05 minutes
Diet #06·- order
Diet # 16··- declaration
Dkt #I 7·- notice and order
Dkt #18 .. notice
Dkt #19 - ord¢r
Dkt #25 .- notice & R n R
Dkt #26 .- notice & R n R;
Dkt #27 .- notice & R n R
Dkt #29··?
Dkt #30 - judgment
c. In re: Fine 2:09-mc-00129

Diet #01-· order
Dkt#02 -? BOTH RECORD & NEF
Dkt #03 order
Dkt #07 - order
Dkt #[2 -- order
Dkt #14·- ordpr
Dkt #15 - order
d. US v City of LA et al (2:00-cv··1l769)
Dkt #01-- complaint
Dkt #? -- SUMMONS - BOTH RECORD & NEF
Dkt #fJi - minutes
Dkt #25 - minutes
Dkt #38 -- miljutes
Dkt #52 - order
Dkt #122 - order
Dkt # 123 - consent decree
i.
Page 3/3 December 29, 2009 /'
5) If possible, written responses are requested, with reasonable, explanations, in any case(s) where
access was denied, if any.
6) Please ~et me know the total sum required in pay, so that 1 may provide the payment on the spot.
Respectfully,
Dated: December 29, 2009
La Verne, County of Los Angeles, California Joseph H Zernik
, ).~iL
j~5sEPfrH zEltNlK
PO Box 52b, La Veme, CA 91750
Fa>;: 801 9980917
Email 'Sizl:Z345@eartllJinlc,n~t'>
j.
i."
i
(
!
- California Central District - Display Receipt https:!fecfcacd.circ9 .dCllfcgi-biniDispJayReceipt.pJ?9174 I9357808 ...
;~lMP..·Ve(5ion:l. 0
rt"Q;tl:-.:acd ecfmai13cacd.liscourc.s .:..wv ;".
n~: ectnef~.a':d. USCOUl."ts .gov
f-1essage- Id: <:S~ 610J9~acd.USCDurr.!:ii. gOY>. !
B(:c: crw_r'eess@cacd.U5collrtS.90v, C!{D~}~a;l~~cacd.l~scourts .go..·
Subie;::t:Acr.ivity if!. Ca!:>e 2:0a-c·J-Dl~S~I:-GI\F·~J\N Joseph -l,en,:'iI:"¥ Jacqueiit~e Conncr e: 0:1 Complaint - l,?eferre:d)
ccnr.ent-rype: ~ex!"./plain*·"No·rp. 'to rtlE{,[C ACCESS U5EP.S"'''''' YO\i rn.'ly 'liew thp. !iled dcc:ument.s once wjtho~lt char..;,ie. To avoid. lat.e:r cha::ges, dO\\'fl.load
vN.1TED STATES nISTRICT COURT. CE::NTRAL pIS't.!UC'!' Of" CA!..!:rORNIA
Notice of Elect:!:onl'': Filing

'!'h~ follcwir.'3 t.xa.r:.sactior: "'~1G entel'ed . or. 3j7i20CB 9:55 AM PS'I al:d filed
on ~i5!2(103
Case N'}lI'le: JQseph Zernik v. Jacqueline~ Connor err itl

Case Number: 2: Oij-c'.p··l S50 :1~tpS: / / e<:f . <;iJcd. USColirts. gov!cgi ··bi r./OktRpt .pl·?{.O~<.n H
COCumen t I'h,moer: I.
Copy the VEL address from thf~ l.1.ne .helow .i."tQ the lo(~at.i.on ba'!" ,)t yo'.u: web
bL·owser ::0 v ie\l: the ctocumem.: htq;s: 11E.!<:t. cacd, uscourts. gov/'::2·i ·bi.n/S:how._C':c!se_d,oc: J., 409~:il, ,f'o1AGIC, , , )'}
Do,~ket. Text.:
CCNPLAINT filed against Defctldantsl~~ndiJ Harr_~Cole(her offlf.:ia] :;~lpacit.y as
.:iucgc G!: :::he SiJpericr COU!·t of La8 Angeles County, \.;ze~l:. Distr~ctJ, Patricia
Collins{i.J~di'Jidt;ally), Pat:::icia ColHnD(llt.s/he:- off:ic~al c:apiKit~' as Judge
of: r:he super.ior court of bas A.."geles Count.y, West Dis¢rict".), 1'erry Friedmal"l (.i.nd.ividually).
Terry [·'riedman (his/her official capacU:.y as .Judge of t:.he SUP~l'i.·:tr. Cou:(.(. of
L,en Angeles county, West. District). Gerald Rosenberg (~r::.divid;JiLlly), Gerald
Rosenberg (his/her off:idal capac.i.cy as- Judge of the S~1per:~,cr CCllrt of b;)c
Angeles C01.Int.y, West Dist.r.i.ct}, Debbie Nites (indi .... idu~lly), Debb~e Witts (ill
her official capacity as Court Mar.ager:, cjvil TJnlimit~d, the S\1~e.rior Cou:-r.
of Los Angeles country, Wes!:. Dif;;:,rict):, Vivian Jairucn.r:.dividually), Vivi.lH
Jil.Lme(in her or-fic.La!. capacity .. s Covrtroc:,n Clerk, oepa!:"tment. X, the superio!:"
COurt af Los A.ngl~les Country,. W~IH. Oist:rict}, GregorY:O'S::ietl.ReUre<'I.
Jl.:cge, individually), Gregory O'Brien(Rti!l:in'~d ,;l;cge ib. rds capac:o.ty
<is Prcpo!.H':d Refer!"ei. ADR sel·vi.ces, Inc. las it c~:-pnril~ioJlj, i\.Uil 3erviceg.
Inc. (and its capaCity a9 neH~raL providp.:- that employ~d
Retir,Mj O'B:'ien),
D~vid pas~ernaldlndividua.lly}. David Puster.nak{ia hlS:~ftici:l:.
c:tpa,city as
Receiver in SaP.':aan v Zernik {SC087400j:). Angelo t'!Czi19 Lir..dividoaHy} • Ange.lo
M02ilo!ir. their capacities as Officers of Countr}"Wide: Financiill C01:por.a~.ion).
Sandor Sarnuelsilndividually), Sando:" Samuelstir. thei:r·~capac1t:.es as Officers
of CountrY\'lide P:Lnancial Corpo:-at.'iOit],i Covn::rywlde Home Loans, :nc .• Mara
Escrow company, JOb, Jacqueline Connor- (indi vid\.!ally) , ~ Jacquel:.ne Connor (he"
offir::ial capacity as Judge of the B;}p~ricL' court of Los A:,gelp-s (:oun.ty, We,;~
Dist=-ic~J, Allan GQod..-r.an(il~d.ivi;jually)!, Allan Goodrnao{his off:..cial c3fJacit'l
as Judge of ~he Supe:cioI COUI"t. of Loa A..'lgelc9 county., West. Di:H:rict), John.
Segal (in.div:'dually) , John se<:;al{hiS official capacity~as JllGgC' of the SupC':rior
Court ot Los AI~geles Couaty, ~Iest Di.st:!:·i.ctl, Linda Harc-ColeiulcividuallyJ
Ca.se assigned co ,J'\.ldge Gary A. Feess a:"ld referred to Magistra!;e ,rudge Marg,H-et
A. Nagle (Filing fee$350 PAID. i, !il~ by Plc>lntiff Joseph Z.~rnik
tel:)
:GO-ev-::'5!).O Noci<:e h.as been elect:-cn,£<:all}' mailed t(;:;
;~~a~~~-:S50 Notice has been delivere4 by First Class: o. S. Kilil or by
.JOSeph Ze:-nik
2':i 15 Saint Geo:-ge S;:reet
Los .A.n9l~lcs, e;.. 90027
The fonowing document {G) are ill;;uociated with th:is t1~aneacticn:

Document description: M,lin DOt~umenr.
Original filf~name: M:\CV Case Opg\LA08CV1550mu~··t<t1>..'Il··;L9F13.pdf
Elec!::ronic dCCWneJ11: St."'fllP~ ;
(STA..~P cacdS~.amp._.J:D:: l0201Y0914 [Dat.:e,;3!7!200aJ [Fi leNumbe:r=5 H< li138 -01 D6b7e2S:21 7b9J5cdGbc1748d6sa75ffc93ee~:Hidf4c..b91Gbasa"15.babOO,o3c:l
f53e4 Be2claO
I· r
1 of 1 12/29/20093:57 PM
- Califomia Central District - Display Receipt https:llecf.cacd.circ9 .de nJcgi-biniDlsplayReceipt.pi? 342248352884...
l-1n1E "Ve~5ion: 1 . G
F:n,llll: c3cd ecC!'r.3 il@ca.<.:d.UIH':OU!:t.S,gov
1'0: CC!:I~~!f~cacd.Gscourts .yov
Mf!!:fii'lge-ld: ~S1 81 053@cacd.uscou::'"ts.qov>
Bec: CRV_Feess@cacd.uscourts.go.." CP..!) ~.Nagl e~cacd. ;lSCOUr:tG. qov
SUbject:Activir.y in Case 2:(;a~cv-0155li-G;:'f"HAN ,l:;seph iZern:ik v. Jacquelit)e Conner et al SUT:Hl'iCnS IS9i.1cd
COJlten::~Type: text:/plaia"'H'NOT~ TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS· ..... You may vicw the ~iled dcCti.:l1en;:s once ....ithout Chi:l:"ge. 7'0 avoid lat.e::- cha:-qes, downie-lad
iJN:tTEC STA"'!'2S DISTRICT COURT. C£NTRA!,., DLSTRICT Or CALH'OR:NIA
N"otic:e of Electronic Filing

7he following transaCt:.cn was er:.tered on 3/7/2C08 1 5"1 A"1 PST and filed
0:;), s/5/20eR
Case Name: ,Joseph Zer.r..ik v . .Jacque) ir.c Conner et .<)1

Case Humber: 2:CR-cv~~5'50 https://ecf.c,),cd..:Jscour!:s gov/cgi~hin/CktKpt.pl?40'J918
Filer:
ur';CU;TIEmt N:Jflwer:
No document actached
Docket Text:
20 DAY SlUT'¥'lions Issued ~e Complaint: - ~Refer-red (ll as: to Defendants Linda
Han-Coledher of-fi.cial c.apacit.y as ,Jud.ge 0;: the Su.peI:i"Or Ccurt of: Los Angeles
County, West. Dist:.rictl, Fat:r.icia CCll1.tlsLi.:ldividt.:.allyl, !?at:t"icia Co.llinsltlis/her
l~f:fic.ial capacUy as Judge of the Supcr1.o~ Ccu::"t of. LoS Angeles County, west.
Disr.rict), Terz-y Friedman (indi vidually), Terry Friedman {hi5/he~ of fj.cial
capacity ~'I.S .Judge.of. the Superio=, Cour!; of Los Angeles c,Junt~t, West Dis~rlct},
Gel:a.lc Rosenberg (1 n<!.i.vidua l.J.y) , Gera ldi Rosen.be:r:g (his/Her ofUcial capaci t.:y
as \Judge of the S\1pe:!:"iGr COUI·t of L06 An<Jeles Cou.nty,'i'l(~st District), Debbie
Wil;.t;s (indivi.duallyl, Debbie Witt.s iin hel: ()ff.iC.i.al ~;apac1ty a!'i Court Manage,r.,
Civil Unlimir.ed. :;he Superio:!:" Cour: (.)!;!..os Angeles Count.ry, West District),
Vivian Jairr:e(indivi<:h.lcl.lly), Vivian iJa.imeCin ber official capacity as Ccu:t'tr'oom
Clerk, Vepar.tment I, the Super-lor CO'.).:::,::; of I.os At!gele.$ Cot.:.ncry, ~/cst Distr'ictl,
Gn't9'ory O'BrierltRet;ired ~rurlge, individ~lallYi. Gregory ~O'!!riel~(ReU:::-ed
~rudge l..n his capacity ,1$ propcs-cd RefeFre), /\DR servtqes. Inc. (aB a ccrporat:.io!l~,
~~~rI:~~ ~C~:~i~:l~~~~~~[i~~~ i~~l~~~;~~ 1 ~~; ~e~~~~~ ~~~;'~;~~k\~~~ t. h ~:p~~~~~ i :~t.iT.ed

capacity ilS Receive:!" ir. Sama.an v Zerni~ (SC0874 DC) ), ~"lgelo ~ozilo(if~dividual!.y).
Ar.gclo MOziLo(in ::.heir capacit.ies as Officers of Co~r.~rywide P!n.a.·'U::.ial Corporation),
Sa:ldor Samuels (individ~alIy), SandOl: B.amuels (in their :capacitie_s as Officers
of. Count~ywide Fir~ancial Co::poration), Countrywide HO~ r..oanr., Inc., Mara
Escrow Company. DOE, J'acqueline Connor~individually). ,Jacq;Jeline conuorfher
t)fflclal capacity as J~dge of the $\lper10r COlirt of Leis Ac.geies (oun~y, We~t
District), Allan GOodma..'1 {individual ly) , Allan Goodmar..('his official capacity
,IS JUdge cf the superior court of r~os Angeles county, .West Di.strict), ,Jnhn
Segal {individually}, J'ohn Segal (his of.ficial capacity;as audge of the superior
C(;url:. 0:': .Los Angeles County, West DlstrictJ. Linda'Ha~t~Cole!:indlvidually}.
(e::)
2:0a-cv-1550 Notice has been electronically :r.ailerl to;:
.08-cv-1.'55Ct Notice has been delivered: by First Class :tr. S. Hall or by

fax. to:
Joseoh Zer!l.ik
?"15~ Sain!: George Streer..
Los Angeles, :::1', 9QC27
i.
1 of 1 12/29/2009 3:58 PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt bttps:i/ecf.cacd.circ9.dcn/cgi-biniDisplayReceipLpl?213391096138...
t"IFI~- Vel'S Lon; 1 . 0

fr.-om: cacd.. _e.ci:mai 19cacd, uscou::;'ts. gOY
To; ec.f.nef@cacd. llSCOlJrt;s. gOY
Message- Id: <:54 811.11@cacd.uscQu::::"ts.gov>
Bee; nef@cacd.circ9.den
Joseph zernik
2~.1.5 Saint George Street
Los Angeles eA 90027
OS
Suoject:Actlvity i.n Case 2:C8-cv-01550~·G.I\F··'1A:.'f,Joseph :Ze:rnik v. ,Jacqueline Conr.or et 81 Not.ice of Reference to a US Magi:5t:::"ate Jlldge (CV··25)
Content.-Type: text/plairl*"'''NOTE 1'0 PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*· .... You may view t.he fi.led documents oace wit.hout charge. 'I'o avoid later charges. oownload
UNITED ST;t'\TES DIS'rRICT COURT, CENTRAl. DISTRICT OF C1\.LlFORNIA
N()tice of Elect,:conic Filir:.g

The i:ollowi.::1g tTa.'1saction was ~.!ntered: 0;1 3/7/2008 :0 ;00 AM PST and fEed
on 3/5/2008
Case Name: Jcneph :!.ernik v. Jacqueline, Conno:r et al

C,,1se Number: 2: G8-c'l-1550 https:/ leel:. cacti. uscourts .gO"./https: I /e~. . f .caca. uscourts. gov/c':ii-bin!DktRpt .pl ?409S18
FileT. :
00CU:llent;. N'u:!,ber; 4
Copy t:he URi.: <'l.ddress franl the 1.Lne belOW .Lnto the lCJc.a,tior:. bar ot your web
b:owser r.o view the docament: -1
Docket. 'j'<"..xt:
NOTICE OF REFERE~ICE t.o United States Magist.rat.e ,Tudge ,r4argaret A. Nagle,
(et.)
2:08··c'.'"··1550 Notic{:: has been electronically mailed to:
;08-cv-15S0 Notice has been delivered~by First. Class ·u. S. Mail or by

fax to:
Jcseph Zernik
2115 Saint George Street
tcs Angeles CA 90027
US
'.
1 of I 12i29i2009 4:00 PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt https://ecf.cacd.circ9 .dcnlcgi-biniDispf.ayEeceipt.pl?5tJ·730 1281 089 ...
MIME-Version:l.a
1-~rom: cacd eCfmail@cacd.uscourta.gov
To: eCfnef@cacd.us-courts.gov
Message" Id: <548118Sikacd. uscourts. gov ....
Bee: CRD_Feess@cacd. uscourt.s . gov, eRD_ Nagle@Cacd.l1scourts_gov
Subject:Al;\:ivity in Cc~se 2:0S-Cv-015:;O:.GAF··MA;.'1 Joseph Ze_mik v. ,Jacquelin.e Connor et al Rx Parte p.ppl.ication for Temporary Resr.raining Order
Content··Type: text/plain* ...... NOTE TO PUELIC 1It.CCESS USERS ........ You IT:&y view the f:L.cd dOC'Jments oace wi;:-hcut charge '1'0 avoid late:r. <.:ha:r.gcs, :h::wnload
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALTFO:RNIA
No:::ice of Electronic Ihling

'l'he following tra!lZ~1ctior~ was eatered ,on 3/7/2008: 1C, 10 AM PST and fi:l ed
on 3/5/~.;o08
Case Name: .Joseph Zerni k v. ,Jacqueli:'Je Connor ec al

Case Number: 2: oa-cv~ 15~(O https: I/ecf. cacd. usccurtS .gov/cgi··hin!DktRpt .pl,?<10991H
Filer; Joseph Zernik
Docllment. N\:mber: 5
Copy t.l'le URL addx:'e9s from the lir"e below into the location bar of Y':)~lr Web
browser to view the document: https: I leer. cacd. usc,::urts. gov/c.:gi "'bif'l./show_cas€_doC?5, 40J9"iB, ,MAGIC, , I 18
Docket Text:
VERIFIED EX PARTE: J'~PPL!Cjl."TrON ~;or Temporary Restl:a.i.ning Ord(~r A;,~D for O:::"der
to show Cause and EX1HBITS filed by Plaintiff Joseph Zernj,k. Lodged PL"oposed
order. {eti
2:Cg-cv-155C Notice has been elecrxonically mailed to:
:08-cv-1550 Notice has been delivered by first Class u. S. Mail or by

fax to:;
Joseph Zernlk
2415 8aint George Street
LoS Angeles. CA 90027
The follow-irlg c.oC'-lment (s) axe associa,ted w.i,th ,:hls t::-ansactiorl:

Document descr.iption: r·1ain Document
Original filename: :-~:\CV Case Opg\:'AC8CV01550MA."'l'-EX PARTE.pdf
Elect.ronte document stamp:

(STAMP cacdStamp ..,ro::. 1 02 02 90914 (Da t e::.3/7 /200 BJ [Fi leNumber"'54 8118<1 - 0] [bd2C7:::cG8a5 5aec67 4 4e34UeS04 94 Cad54 4dbe564 73 3fb32)'78 3i:1.664 641'..'1 7 92c9d22.:ta 7bd
1 of 1 12!29i2009 4:00 PM
- Califomia Central District - Display Receipt https:!!ecfcacd.circ9.dcn!cgi-bin!DisplayReceiptpJ?2025292640 18 ...
MH<iE:- Ve:( ~ ion: 1 . 0

From: cacd ecfm..: l.il@cacd.uscQurt.s gcv
To: eCfnef@cacd.uscourts.gov
Mes5age- Id: d481S2H@cacd.usccur.ts.gov>
Bee: caseasgn_cm,n.-tdocSC01cacd. uscourts. gOIl, nef@ca.cd.c:irc9.d{:o I nef(ki;1<:~d..circ9. den , crd_lett.s@lcacd ~scouxts.~,ov
,Joseph Zernik
2<115 Saint George St".reet
[,os Angeles CA 90027
US
folubject:Acti .....ity in Ca:::e 2:C8-cv-C1550-VAP-(",.AN Joseph Zernik v. :;acq~eline Corme-r et al 224 Returning Case J.:or Reassignment w/i di'lrisicr. (CV 39)
~;~~,~.~~t~:~~~~ J;~~.~;'~;:~.1'~~~;~~:!'~~~~~~R~~~T~~2~S~I
..U~~i;~1~i~U may view the filed documents once WiU10l.,t charge. TO avoid LOiter char.ges, dcwnl·:)ao
Notice of El.ect~:cnic Filing

The following t::-ansacti.on was entered. on 3/7/1.008 10 41 AM PS'l' and filed
on 3/7/20GO
Case Name: Joseph Zernik v. ~jaGqueline- Conner et al

Case Number: 2: 08 .. cv··1550 htt.ps: / feef. cacd. '..lscourts .govhttps /Ieet. cued. uSCCt:.rts. gov/cgi -hin/DktRpt .pl.? 1(i~J9J.})
Fi ler:
DOCl.lment Number: 9
Copy the aHf~ address from the Ene below int.o the location o;;;r cf your Web
bro'tJser tG view the doclJmenr.: 9
Docket 'rex t. :
ORD&R RETURNING CASE POR REASSIGNMENT by Judge J Spence.• Letts ORDER case
recurned co the Clel.:k for random :t"E~assi<.mrnel1t Cl,.lrsuan!.:: t<> Ger.eral Order 0'1-02.
Case :randomly 17f:!3.ssigned f:rOill ,Judge J. - spence-r Letts t.o Judge Vi:r:9inia A.
Phillips fQr all fu:t:"ther fn:oceedings. 'The case number. wtll r:ow ref.lect the
Init:.ials of t.be t:t"anl.'lferee Judge CV 08"1550 VAP (MANx):, (!'n)
2;CB·cv-1550 Notice has been electroniCally :nailed to:
2:0a-cv-1550 Notice has been delivered::by First: Class U. S. Ma.il or by

fax to: :
Joseph Zernik
7.4.1.5 Saint George St~eet
:,09 i-i...'1geles CA 90027
US
1 of 1 12/29/20094:01 PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt https://eeLeacd.circ9 .dcn!cg i-biniDisplayReceipt.p1'1396747083396...
MIHB-Versi.oi1: .1.. Q
Fr.om: Ciled ecfma:l ,1.@cacd.lJscourts.gov
To: eCfnef@cacd.u.scourts.gov
Message·· Id: <.5515712C<fCCiCd. uscourts. gov...
E\cc: caseasgn"courr.docs@cacd.uscourcs.gov, nef@cacd,ci.l:c9.d~il, nef@cacd.cit"C9.dcn, crd_l1agle@cacd.l.iscol:,rt3.g()V
Joseoh Zernik
2415- Saint; George Street;:
,UJ5 Angeles ell. ')0027
US
Sllbject:Acti....ity in Case 2:0g"cv-(j1550~VAt>-C'i'J Joseph Zernik v. J~lcquelil~e Connor et. al :Reassign Case upon Recusal 01' M.?i.gisrxate (Judge (CV-ll0)
Content"Type: tcxt!plain**"'UOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS U$RR8 .... * YQll lr:.ay view t.he fi.1.ed documents once without cha:.Lge_ To Olvoid lat:er charges, (kwnload
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRA1~ DIBTRICT OF CALIF09:NIl\.
Not ice of Blectl:onic Filing

The following t:ransaction was entered on 3/13/2008 ..l::)9 PM PDT and tiled
on 3/1312008
Case N~lfne: Joseph ?.e:r.nik: v. Ji:lcqueline Connor et al

Case Number: 2: OB··cv·· 1550 https:/ feci. cacd. uscourt9 . govhtt.ps ;J leei cacd. uscourts .goV!C9.i-bip.!DktRpt. pl ?':l0991 a
Filer:
D(.,)cument Number: 10
Ccpy the URI.. ad<1ress from the line below :i.nt.o UlC locat.1.on bar of your Web
browse! to view the docc.me.!1t: 10
Doc.ket Text:
ORDER RETURNI.NG CASE FOR REA.SSIG~'"'MEN'"!' UPON RECUSAL by J~a'3istrate Judge Marg'ar.et
p.•• Nagle. ORDER case returned to the Cle1.-k tor random :-easr;i.gnmer.. t General
Order. 05·07 Referral purSl~ant to General Order 05-U7 a.ud General Ozde!" 07-02.
Case ~andomly reassigtled for-om Judge rti~r9'aret "A. Nagle to .Judge Carla woeh·r.le
for ~1.J.lfl~rt.I'e:- proceedings The C-3.se, number will.now 1:$:fle.c:l: the initiaJ.$
of the transfe~ee ..J udge CV 08··1550 VAP (CW). (rn)
2:C8-cv-155Q Notice has bee!l electronicaJ.ly mailed to:
2:0S-cv-1550 Notice has been delivered:by First. Class U. S. Nailor by

fax t.o: :
Joseph Zeraik
2415 Saint. George Street.
r.,09 A!.l<;1e1es ,..A 90027
US
I of I ; 2/29/2009 4:01PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt https;/iecf.cacd.circ9.dcnicgi·biniDisplayReceipt.pl?854429840025...
r·HME·, Vers ior:. : 1 . 0
~~~~~.~~~~@~~~~~~;~~~~;~~~;~urts .go\t
Hessage- rd; .:5572)3~(<tf~acd.uscourts gOY>:
Bee: l~ef@cacd. circ9 .den
~Toseph Zernik
~;'H5 Saint George $t,l:'eet
Los ~.ngeles CA 90027
US
Subject:l\r.:t.:i.vity in CaSe 2:0B~cv-01S50..VAP-CW Joseph Zemik v .• Jacq'J.eline Connor et al ;rHnutes of In Chambers Order/Directive nc proceeclng hel
Content-Type: t.ext/plain***NOTF. TO pl.rBt,IC CCF.SS USERS.tu Yoa may view th~..! tiled documl:.'nt,s onCf.,! without: c~Ja:"ge 1'0 avoid later cbar.ges. download
A....
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COIJRT, CENTRAL ~IS'rRIC1' OF CALliFORNIA
Notice of Elec.tronic f'lling

The following transaction was en!:e.r.ed on 3/25/2008 10:25 At-' PDT and filed
on .3/21/2000
Case Name: :Joseph Zernik v. ,Jacqueline: Conno,r et ai
Case Number: 2: 08 cv-l 550 https:lleef.cacd.uscourt.s govhttps:
h
i leet . cacti . uscourts, gov/cgi··bin!DktRpt.. p17409918
Filer~
Document Number: 14
copy the URL address from the line below into the location ba.J: 'J! your Web
b~owse17t.o view the document: 1'1
Docket 1'ext:
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Jl,.:.dge vi:r.gini:a ,~. Phillips DENYING'-
nlainti U 's EX PARl'H APPLICATION for Terr,porary Restrai-ni:,lg Order an.d
EX PARTE APPLICATION fo!.:" Order to ShOW'C,lUSt?'f51. (nlI-go:}
2 :G8-cv-1.5S0 Nor.ice has been eleC1::::-on.ical1y mailed to:
J'ohn W i'attQn jwp~as1aw.com
2: Oa-cv-1550 Notice has been delivered 'by 1!'ir9t Class u. S. Mail or by

tax to: ;
Joseph Zernik
2'115 Saint George Street
Los JI..r.geles CA 90027
US
I ofl 12/29/20094:01 PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt https://ecf.cacd.circ9.dcnicgi-biniDisplayReceipt.pl?331966058217 ...
r-UME-Version: 1. C
{":com; cacd ect"ma.tl@{:ac::d.uncourts .gov
To: ecfnef@cacd.uscou:rts. g~lV
Me~H:::age-!d:<561766'%~cacd.uscourtr:i. gOY:.
Bee: p.ef@ci:\ca.cin:::::.dcn
Joseph Zernik
24.15 Saint Ce(,)rg(~ Street
US
Subject ~Activity in. Case 2:0B-cv-01SSO~VAi'-CW Joseph zernlk v. ,racc;r,leline Connor et al. :Minutes of In Ch.ambeL·~ C::"der/Dir~ct.ive ~ nc proceec.ing hel
Content-Type: text!plain ...... NOTE 'i'O PUBLIC ACCESS USERS"'*" You may' view the filed documents once without. char.ge To .:!:veid later charges, ckiwnload
UNIT2D .sTAT~S DISTRICT COURT. CENTRAL DISTRICr OF CALl1l<~ORNIA
Notice of Elecr.rcnic Filing

The follo......ing transaction was entered .on 4/2/2008 9:11 1\M PDT and filed
on 3/31/2008
Case Name: Joseph Zerni.k v . .:racque1.i.r..e; Connor et al

Case Number: 2: as ··cv-l.550 https:i IeeE . ca~-:d. U5<~ou;rts 9Qvhtt.ps: I /f~cf. cacd. \lscourts. gov/cqi··bin/DktRpt .p.1.?40991 8
Filer:
Document Number: 27
copy the URL address from the line below into the .i.ocation har of: j'cur Web
browser to view the document: 2'1
Docket Text:
r"1INlfI'ES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER he.i.d hefore ,Judge Carla "~e;ule : Plaintiff.
is responsible fox· complying with t.he requ:L:r.ements :of 'Rule "!\ of the P"ederal
Rules of. Ci.vil Pr.·ocedures. A copy of Fed.R. eiv. P. R'ul~'t ·1 1s attached and
plaintiff is advised to study it caref~lly. "'SEE'ORDER }o'OR. P~;RTHI?R DEi'AILS"·1l
idt)
2:08-cv-1S50 Notice hag heen electronically maned to:
John W Patton jwp@paslaw.com
r'lichael L Wachtell mwachtell@buchalter.com
Sarah l~ Overton sQvertonColcmda··law,com
2:08-cv-1550 Notice has been dl:'livered':by First Cla.ss U. S. Mail or by

fax to: :
Joseph Zernik
2415 Sa.Lnc George St.r~et.
[,06 Angeles CA 90027
US
1 of 1 ] 2/29i2009 4:02 PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt https:/iccfcaccl.eire9.denJcgi-binJDisplayRcceipt.pl?620952273252...
i~IME-Ve:!:sion;.L. 0
From: cacd ecfrnail@cacd.lJ.scourt.s.gov
'l'o:ecrnef@cacd.uscourcs.gov
Message- Id: <561766S0c.acd. usccarts gOY>'
aGe: llef~:::acd.circ9.dCl;
,rcseph Zf.?:t"rlik
24.15 Sai'lt. George Street
Los Angel es <:1\ 90027
US
Subject:Activir.y in Case 2:{)(l-cv-f}1S50,.VAP-CW ,Joseph Zernik v. ,Jacque1i:te Connor' et al ,tl,ir::utes of In Chambers OX'de:r/D:irective rIC proceec',lng hel
Conter'.t-T1-'IH:~:
:,:,p.J::t/plain*"UNOTE TO PUBI.Ie ACCESS USER~*h YOll rna} vieen' the filed docui1l~nt".s once without char:ge. To avoid later dlarges, download
UNITED S'l'A'!'ES DlS'I'RlCT COURT, CENTRA!, DISTRICT OF CT"Il.]PORNIA
Notice of Elect:ronic Filing

The !:cJllowing t.l:ansactioll was enteI:ed on 4/2/2008 9 11 ~~ PDT and filed
on 3/31/2008
Case Name: ,roseph zernik v. Ja,cqueline Connor et a1

Case Numher: 2: Ol)~cv-155(J htt.ps: / feet _cacd. USCOlJrts .govhttps flecf .cacd. ~.scourts .gov/cgi-bi!l/DktRpt. pl ?40991.B
F:Ue:r.:
DOClJment; Number: 27
Copy the URr. address from the line below into the locatiol; bar of your Web
l.lrOWSer to view the document: 27
Dockes Text.: .
r·lIl'.'U1'ES OF IN C?..A""l3ERS ORDER held before \Judge car~a W:oehrle : Plaintiff
'i.s t·esponsible [or complying wir.h the requirements .of Rule .1: cd the Federal
Rules ()f Civil Procedures A copy of Fed.R. Ci...... P. Rulf:! <1 is cxta,checi and
plail:.:.:.iff is advised to study it. carefully. "·SSE ,ORDER POR FJ"F.THER DETATLS**
(dt:
2:QO-cv-1550 Not.ice has been elect.ron:'i.cally mailed ~to:
~l'ohn Ii Patton j'~@paslaw.com
Michael L WaClltell mwachtel1@buchalte:r..com
Sarah L Overton sovertcr~(~cmda··law.com
2: 08 ··cv-1550 Notice has been delivered 'by ltirst Class O. S. Hall ·:)r by
fax to: ;
Josepb Zernik
2·1-15 Saint George St::-g-et
I,oS Angeles CA 9a02'1
us
1 of I ] 2/29i2009 4:02 PM
- Califomia Central District - Display Receipt https;//ecf.cacd.circ9.dcn/cgi-biniDisplayReceipt.pl? 106607153849.,.
~.
MtME-V.ersior.:}..o
From: cd.cd ccfmai l.;fcacd. uscourts .9,,)'"
To: ectne~@cacd.uscourt.s. gOY
Message- Id: <571098<@cacd.usco\)!'tS.gov>
!lee: ;}e.t~cacd.c.i.rc9.den
,]cset>h Zernik.
2415 Sa:!.nt. Geo:ge Street.
[.-os >.n~leles CA 90027
rJS
Subject;Activity in Case 2:0S-cv-OJS50rVA?~C"'Y'lJoseph Zerr::ik v . .Jacqueline Cm.:l.or e~ al ;~\ii1u::es of Ir. Chambers Ord.er!Di!'ec~i\re - no proceeding hel
COfjte~(>TY'Pe: text./plain ...... NC-TE: TO Pv"Bl.iC JII('CESS ;;;Si:RS· .... You may view ~he filed documents once wi!:.t:out. cha:r:ge. 1'0 ...~void, late: cha:ge~. dcwnload
GNI1'ED 8TATT.!S ;;JISTRICT CCURT, CElI."TRAI. I?JSTRIC'!' CP CAJ.IFCRNJ.A
NC:;.ice of Electronic Filing

1'he followiny t:;-ansacr.i{"Jn was ent.e:::op.d :on 4/~8/2no~ 10:1:5 Al.~ PGT ar.d filed
en ,/lB/200e
Case Name: .1oseph Ze:::onik v. Jacquel ine Connot' et al
Cast.! Nureber: 2: OS cv··1550 htt.ps: / feet . ~acd. usccurts .goYhttps; / lee! . :::acd. !J$courts . .gov/cg~i -bin./OktRpt, pl?<l 0:;918
Filer:
Cocumen t Nu:nber; )3
Copy the URL address from t.he lir~e belqw int:.o the location bar {),f your Web
b):Owner to view the document: :n
Docket 'l'ext:
MHl'JrES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held bef:o)\e ~ludge Ciirl,a Woehrle re: Amendment.
(~Jiot:ion :t"elated) f15] > !-'inal MOTION to Qismiss Case ,:wd Proposed O~'der[13J,
f-':OTICN to Dismiss Case ti91 f MOTTON to Disrni.S9 Case (231 .. MOTION to Di~miss
C('lmplaint JO,lllderi16l. 1I.1:!. of these n<>ticed he;.nAings are ORDERED
Ct/;.~ CALENDAR. That is, shert.! ..... ill be no px'oceedi:lgs in COUI:!;. I)!l any of these
da.t:e~~. P.laintitf may serve and file his opposition, 01"" not.ice ot oon-opPos.i.ti.cn,
to the motions t.o dismi.ss on or before May 9, 2008.' Defendant's :ceply
i.f any, sha.ll be served and filed on or before May -23, 2(:08. ',the mot.iona
·.,.ill then be tak.en u:Hier subml9-sion a:ld a decision win issue as ~!Con as
possible. The following are CBNIED AS MOOT: plaint:iff"s motion f:>r
continuance DO), and ex parle l:t.."Q.uest to COIRinue. "SEE ORDnR FOR FURTHER
DET1\!J"su edt)
2: 08"cv···lS50 Notice has been e!f..'(.'t.ror.ic.ally mailed 'lo;
John W Pat-ton jwp@paslaw.com
Michael L wachtell J':lwachtell@buchalter.com
Sarah L Overton $overtcn0cmda-la.... COl'll
2:oa~('.v-1550 Notice fu"l.B been. delivered by Pirst Cla.ss ". S~ Mail tI:)r by
fax to •
•Joseph 2crni.k
:H:r, Saint George Street
:"09 :Ar.ge.les CA 90027
,JS
1 of 1 12/29/2009 4:02 PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt https:!/ecfcacd.circ9.dcn/cgi-bin/DisplayReceipt.pl? 104362257558 ...
r·!zr~Z-Versicn: 1.0
F:-orr.: cacd_ecfmaillJc;J,co. usccurts .yov
1'0: ect'netScacd. uscourts .gov
Measaga- Cd: <S'l] 87S5@cacd.u5COUY.t!l .gov>
Bee: CRD_Fhillips~cacd.U9cour:.s .gov, CRD_W'..Jch.rle0cacd. uscoun:g. gov I 'i''in.a_Naghshineh@cacq.uscourt.s.gov, j'JI'P@pasla~.com, r~.....achtell@bucr~l ter. com, so
SUbjec~:A.ctivicy -Ln Case 2:C!a-C'v-015S0.... VAP~CW Joseph ~ernik v . •Jacqueline <~onnCl~ ec al !!?!'"cof of Service (sllhseque:1t dcc:l;llents)
CO:l;tent-Type~ tex.t/plai:l. ..... NOTE TO PUBLIC ACC~SS USERS ...... YOll may v.iew the filed documents once .... ithout. cha.rge '1'0 a,v..: li.j l~ter. char.-:;es. download
UNITED S'fATES DIS'fRICT COURT, CENTRAL CI51'RIC7 OF CALIFOR:.'nA
No:.:ice of Electro:lic Pi l:..nq

The fcllowir.g transaction ''''as e:lt.ere<!, on ~;2!J2009 11.:23 k'1 f';}l' ar.d filed
or. d,/!.7.!2000
Case Nwr.e: Jc·seph Ze-rr.ik ~l. Jacquelir.e, Connor. et al

Case Number; 2: OS¥cv-1550 http9:/lccf.cacd.uscourf.s govicgi··bin/r.)(;:RpL. rJl?4 0~.J91S
~'iler: ,Josepl~ Zernik
Documenr. Num..~er: <13

copy t.he URI. address from the 1 ine below ir.to r.he iocai:.i~.)n bar of your ;.Ieb
browser to view the documenr.: hCtP9; I leer.. caed .llscr:mrts. gov/cg:i. -bin/show_.cao~,,_c.CC(43.40,9918, ,MAGIC, , ,179
Docker. 'Text".:
PROOFS O~ Sr:RVICE OF Sur.llMONS AND cor..a ..1.~!NT filed by plaintiff Joseph zern'i..k,
served on 4/7/?008. (ca)
2: 08-cv-1.550 Notice ha.~ been electrcnical1y m~'liled to:
Sarah L Overt.on sOlferton@cmda··law,cem
,John w Patton wI jwp@pasla.w.com
Mi.chael L Wachtell mwa.=htel1@bucl~i:l.lter.com
2::oa··c..... -:.SSO Notice ba3 been delivered 'by First Class 0'. S, M'a:ll or by
fax to:
Joseph ZC!'":lik
2415 $ai:lt George St.reet
LOS Mgeles. CPr. 90027
The following doc:..lmer.t(s) 3.re associ"te<1 with this t:!"anSCiction'

(;(."cwnent descript.ioTi: f'"1ain Document. :
Or :'ginal filename: M: \?OD13\Civi 1 \l1\.OaClJ015S0VAP-A~J:'r:y-, 4. pdf
Slecr.ronic dccument Stal!lp: . .

(STA.¥;P cacdStamp_ ID=lC20290914 rDate~~/21/2008) r~i leNurnber==> '118754- 0 l Ibba ld3ge3bOf21 fbf790504b910cebb5e.,.le639S9'11l. fC2)c;26000d56i)abi.. f7S..::tJca 513!
,, .
1 of 1 12/29/20094:03 PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt https:!/ecfcacd.circ9.dcnlcgi-biniDisplayReceipcpl? 142526158179...
t<1IME-VeI:S:!.OIl:.1.C
Fr.om: cacd..,ecfmai l@cacd.tlscourl;.s.'jov
TO: ect'rlcf@CdCd.\l9COIl:n:'S.gov
:vJesuage·· Td: <585B786~c.:ac.d.usc{)urts gOY>
Bce: nef@cacd.circ9.dcn
Joseph zernik
2415 S~1int Georqe Street
Los JIJ1geles ell. 900:27
us
Subject:Activity in Case ~~:oa-c1t~Ol550;"VAP-C;'1.Joseph Zernik v. ,1f:.cql.ieline Connor et. al.Minutes of Tn Chambel:o order/D:i.:r.C!c!"_:i.ve - ::1i.' proceeding hel
c·:mtent··'l':.rpe: text!plain*UNUTE TO pm:n~IC ACCESS USERS*u 'lou may view the filed docum~ntg once .....ithou;;. ChaI"ge To avoid ldter Chi;l:'Ge~~, dOWl:load
UNITED STATES DISTR!CT COURT, CEN'TF..AI, D"i$'l'RICT Cfo~ CAr,IFORNIA
Notice of Elect.ronic Piling

The follOWing transact.ioa was ent,e::red on Si15/2008 9:49 AM PtJ' ima filed
on 5/15/2008
Case Name: ,h1seph Zerr,ik v. ,Jacqueline; Connor et 03.1

Case N\~mber: 2: G8-cv-1550 h::.tP3: I leer. . cacd. USCO\l::::'U) govhtt.p13:! leef. eaed. uscour.ts .govlcgi···bin/DktRpt. pI ?0I0Sna
Filer:
Decument N~. lln.ber: 57

Copy the URL address from t.he line below into t.he locacion bar of your Web
browser to view the document: ';,7
Docke::.. Tex.t:
M!~l"lJ'rES OF IN CHA."'IlBERS ORDER held befoL!; Jl.idge Carla Woehrle: Plaintiff
is ORDERED not toEile anything further until .a report and :r.t;:c·;}l!lrnendaticn
or other o.:der has been issued on the mot.ions to dismiss Deft"'.:o.diults are
ORDERED 1:0 Ole only t.heir r.eplies ,_0 plainti.ff's oppmi:it.ion. DENYlNG
REQUEI3T fer: Heaz'ing Order to Show Cause Re: contempt t55i. DEKYJ:l'm REQUBH'l'
tor Ruling Ev.i.denc.iary Ruling l)Il D:"H'.:ket #20 t Bed by Det<mdatlt:; L56], and
DENYING REQU8ST for Or.der for The Honorable .JUdges Carla Woehrle .and VirGinia
Phillips to file rnatement.s on the record regarding relal:ionahips, if .:lOY,
wir.h parties list.,,->Q on plaintiffs certificate of. pal:ties [50J . .;11 mat:.t:er5
oth"..>r than Lhe pending fl,ot:.lons to dismiss a::::'c STA.:lF;O l..l.nt:.l tho:~e motions
C,,,n be :-esol veo. '~·9EF. ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAH,g·..., : {dt}
2:08-cv-1550 Notice has been electl~oniqally mailed to:
.;ohll W Patton jwp@pa.slaw.coCll .
Micn<:lel L Wachtel] mwach::.,elH~buchalter cem
Sa:rah L Overt:.OC'a sove:::ton@cmda-lilw.COll\
2:08-cv¥1550 Notice has been delivered by First Class U. S. Ma:l1 or by

fax to:
Joseph zernik
2011S Saint George BtJ:"(~et.
I,os Angeles C1\ SOU27
US
1 of 1 12/29/20094:03 PM
- Califomia Central District - Display Receipt https:!fccf.cacd.circ9.dcnJcgi-binlDisplayRcccipt.pl?9336154651 06 ...
l·1IME-Vergion; 1. C
From: cacd_ ecfmail@cacd.uscourts.gov
To ~ ecfnef@cacd . uacCt;rl;s. gov
Message-·ld: -<::5'.102"1.'9(~cacd.llscourts .gov>
:
~~~j ~~~':'~;~l;~~~@~~C~~~:C~I:~~:~~i?~.1.5;~~V~~~~~1~;~:~~.i:.~~~~t:~ g~:~;;;~~n~a~~~;~:e~~C:~dR~~~~U~~~tI~;" l:~~~~;~ law, com, nr/lachLell@b\J.C~1al te.r. . com I so
Content"Type: to?..xr.!plain""'*NCTB TO PUHi.,IC l'~CCESS USERS*"- You may view the tiled documents \.-)!\ce without. charge '1.'0 avoid later ch.:i.rgcs, download
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT> CENTRAi. bIS'1'RICT OF C1\I,IPORNIA
Not.l.ce of Elect.ronic FiEng

The following transactioa . . . as em:c.::'ed by Over' ton, Sarah en 5/2~!/2008 3:47
PM PDT ar:.d fiJ.ed 011 5/22/2008
Case Name: ,Joseph Zernik v. ,Jacquel ine: Connor e!'"~ a1

Case Number: 2:08-cv-1550 ht:.:ps:/!ecf..cacd.uscol.1rts gQv/cgi··btn!C-ktRpt.p.i.?409918
Pi.ler~ Allan Goodmanpar.r.i.cia Co:U.insGe~ald Rosenbe:r:gJacq'..:.el:ine Cc.n.noz:Terry

Pri edman,John .sega.lI~i.nda Hart-CoJ.eDI:?bb ie wi tt.sVi.vian Jai meG:r.egory 0' Brien
Documen r. Num..r,er: 59
Copy the URL address from the line below inr.o the loc.:at.ir).:1. bar of your web
browser to view the document: https: / jecf.. cacd. U9COU:::·ts. qov!cgi·,bin/show_case._doc?59, 40:991.$, ,t<'..AG!C, I ,7.21
Docket l'ext:
REPLY support cf motion MOTION to Dismiss Case [19] •filed by Defendants Patricia
Collins, Te::-:ry pried:rcan, Cerald Rosenberg, Debbie W.~tts, ViVian Jaime, G:regory
O'B!":ien, ,Jacquel.i.ne Connol:, A1Ian Goodman, Sohn Segal, T~:Lnda H.il.rt~Cole.
(Overton, Sarah)
2:0B-cv-1.550 Notice has been eleot::"onical1y mai.1.ed
sarah Il Overton so ;fer t.on@cmda-law. com
John W Patton Jr. jwp@"pasl.aw.com
Michael I~ wachtell :r:~iJ.chtell@b\,lCJialter corn
2:C8-cv··155C tioticc ha.s been delivered by Pirst Clags U. S. HaJl t)r by

fax to:
,Joseph Zernik
2415 Sair~t George St.reet
L(')S Angeles, CA 9002'1
Tile following document:{s) are associat.ed with r.his :transact.i.on·

Document description: Main Document.
Original fi l~name: S ~ \Cases\SLO ~ J'-1dfc ial Cour:.~i l\Zerni k
v. Connor\Reply to Oppositi.oc. to Def.end.ants' Motion to Dismi.pclf:
Electronic docume>.nt 8r.amp:

f STM1P cacdS tarnp....!D=l.0202 90914 £Da te=Sj2 2/2008] (FileNumber=5~I02'1 tB- 0 j [-td02d.Elfde35f5a 791 95e53860036 7e8ae-4eH93J Id2<'lJ4d.'779S8f 835b2ll:6b6eca7 3 '7;eaei:::
1 of 1 12/29/20094:04 PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt hltps:iiecf.cacd.circ9.dcnicgi-biniDisplayReceipt.pl?266393083285 ...
!-1rr'm-Ve:-s.ion: 1. Q
F,roro: cacd ecf.:nai l~cacd. uscourts gOY
To :ecf.nef<:<fcacd. USCGurts. gOY
l'>1essage Id: <~d4 594 O@Ci:l.Cd.ilSCQUrts.gov>
H
Bee: eRn _Phillips@cacd.ul:1ccurts.gov. CRp... woehy.le@cacd ..~scourt9 .g01,;, Tina_NaghahiJleh@cacd.uscourts.gov, jwp~a.sl(l"'.corr, :n'_<,1a,,;htell@bl,l(~halter.com, so
Sllb:i ect :Acti vit.y in C,1..se ;::oa-cv-01550~VAI:'HCW Joseph Ze:rnik v. ,Jacquel ine Connor et ,'1.1 11\mE".ndP.d Complai nt
C'ontent>'l'Y"l?e: text/pL:lin* ... ·NOTE TO PUBLIC l'~CCE$S USERS-*"" JudiCia.l C0nfe.t-ertce of ~he UJlited States policy p<::rmits ar.t.or;leys of. record and parties
UNITE!.) STATES !.'lSTRICT COURT, CE!>."TRAL DISTRICT OF CA.r~:r;FORNrA
Notice of Electronic Pi11.:;19

The following tr:ansaction was entered on 6/2/20e8: 1 :38 PM PDT and fEed
o:c. 5/:~7!200a
Case Name: ':;ogeph Zernik v. Jacqueline·.Ccnno::- e.t al

Ca,se Number: 2:00-c:v-1550 https:/!ecf.cacd.11scourts gov/cgi-bill!DktRpt.pl?40931B
Filer.: Joseph Zer!lik
Documen t Number: 62
('opy the i.:"RL add:ress fxom the line helow into t.he loca:tion bar of y<..'u:r Web
browser to view the document: Document: https:/le<..'t.cacd.usco\lrta. gov/docl/C."310600.3296?rnagi.c....:-1Uffi:"MAGIC&dc.. seq... num~'228&c,w,::::.d'~'I099'J.3
Doeket 'l'f:Xt:
F.i.n:t AMBNDHn COMPLAINT. against Defendants JOseph Zerr:.ik amending Complaint
{Referred}, Complaint (I<.eferred), Compl.ai.nr. - (RefeT.J~ed), '::ompl.aint
(Referr.ed) I Compl.d:i.llt - (Rcfe::-.redl. Complaint {R~ferred), (O:llpLlint - (Referred),
Complaint - (RefeIred), COffi"!?laint (Referred} [:l.}, filed by plaintiff Joseph
Zernik (Attachments: !f (1) Part. 2) {dt} ,
2:C8-cv-1SSO Notice haa been electronically mail.ed ,to:
S,;n·ah T~ Overton . 30'?'~:n.on@cmda-law. co;n
John \-: Patton ,rr jwp0paslaw.com
Michael r.. Waehtell :rMachte.ll@buchalter.com
2:0ij··cv .. 1550 Notice hns been delivered by First Class U. S. Mai.l QX' by
fax t.O: ~
Joseph Zern:i,k
2415 Saint Geo:r:ge St.reet
Los Angeles, (;A Slo027
The followL19 ;jOC~lmen~. (g) are a6socia.ted with this transact Lon:
DOCWlient descript ior:: Ma in Document
Or·ig inal filename: M: \POD13\Ci.vi 1. \r,AOOCV01550CW-ATTY (PT
1) .pdf
Elec~ronic dOCllmen!~ Stamp:
[STAMP cacdStamp_ 1D=1020290914 [Date=6/2/2008l [Fi leNumber"'594 :::ncJ. OJ (0 f7cc~' ffaJ38S33 9C.)Abd0981906929D97a.b2ea23 Bc4 -;'lea6f fc 38ba1e~~06a4592eacOa6 9
Document: descriprion: Part. 2

Origi.nal fiJ.ename: M: \POD13\Civil \I~AOBCV01550CW·ATrY {PT
2) .pdf
Electror..ic dOC\1ment Stamp:
(STAMP cacdStElffi'9...ID= 1020290914 iDat.e=>6(2!2008] iF LI.eNumber=594 5939~ 11 rald926 3234a6bdcb95cc.8e8500 189161 gCe6S62916 BT;g·Pi53C 8efB99C:a515aedce66c9d
I of l 12/29/20094:04 PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt hltps:/iect:cacd.circ9 .dcnicgi-biniDisplayReceipLpl? 109138801381 ...
M!""E~ Vcrs ion:.1 _()

Fro:':l: <;,acd ecfmail@cacd.uscourt5 gOY
T:;:l: ecfnef@Cacd. uscou:;:-ts. go....
r~essa9'e- Id: ·:598095i0cacd. uscourts .gov>!
net'@caca.circ9.den
:'r;c:
• jwp@9,iSlaw.com, mwachtellabuchaltet. c~')rn, sovertoolbCmc.a-Ia...... com., <:rd...thillips@cacd.u9courts.gov. cr.:Jyhi lli~s(4Cacd.'...l3courts. gov_5umry. ti!~a_.na
Jcscph Zernik
tos Angeles CA 90027
US
Subject:Activity in Case 2:08-cv-i)15S0~VAP-CWJoseph z;er:nik. v . .Jacquelir,e Connor et a1 .Minutes of In Chambers O~der/D;.rt!ct:ive - 110 proccedir.g hel
Carltent-Type: text/p'lain· .. ·Nc·rE 70 PUiU,rC ACCESS USSRS· .. • .Judicial Conference of t~le Un.ited States policy permits at.torneys or record and parties
t,;Nl'fED S'fATES DISTRICT COUR'r. CENTRAL OIS'rR1CT OF C".Ai.I.FCRNiA
Noti<.:.€ of Electronic Filing

';'he fol.i.owing ~]:ar.fiaction WaG enl:r.~red on G/9/20ce·9:50 .\1-1 FOT and filed
on 6j~/200a
Ca$e Name: Joseph Zernik ',J. Jacqueliae Connor et al

C.1se Number: 2: 08-cv-1SSO https:/lee!.cc1cd.uecourtci.gov/cgi··bi:n/Dlcr.Rpt. pI ?<lO.9918
?iler:
Document Number: 63 https:ileef cacd. U6courts .gov!doclio3106C41975?:nag:ic... n\lmn-MAGIC&de...SeCLnum=231&caseid=4.099l8

0
Copy the URL address from the line belQ\Il into the Iocation bar ,1t your Web
l:n:owser. too view the document: 63
Otx;ket 'rex!:: :
Munrr'ES 0:::: IN CHAl"!BERS ORDER held befct!:e Magistrat~ JUdge Carl.). Woehrle:
tOe: FUrDING AS MOOT- £X PARTE: APPLlCAT~,ON" for Reconsidcruticn (ia) , i'-inal
f10TION to Digmiss Case aud proposed Crdef(1'31, REQUEST for Rul~[}g
Evidentiary Ruling OIl Docket #20 filed by Defendants [56). l"lOTION ::0 D.tsmiss
Ca$P.'[19J, MOTION t.o Dismiss ease(23), MOT!ON r.o Dismiss Compla.~nt Joil1der(H;)i:lnd
P£NYING EX p~'-R.'rE l\P?LrCl'~T::::m! tn Seal (119.1. ....SKS ORD8R l'·OR FUR'£-i-tER DETAILS""
(dr.) . :
2 :Q8-cv-1550 Notice has been electronically mailed. :to; ~
John W Par.ton jwp&;pilslaw.<:olT; .
Michael L wachtel] mwachr.elhlbudlalter com
Sarah L Overton sovertor:~crn.da-law. com:
2:08·cv··1550 Notice luiS been delivered by rirst. Cl.$s U. S. Mail or by

fax t:o: : .
Joseph ze:cr.ik
2'115 Saint George Street
Los Angeles: CA 90u27
US
101' I [2/29/20094:04 PM
- Califomia Central District - Display Receipt https:!!ecf.cacd.circ9.dcnlcgi-biniDisplayReceipt.pl?3024 17339848...
r-11ME·· Vers ion: 1. • 0

i"rQm:cacd ecfmai1.@cacd.uscourts.gov
To: ecfnef@cacd.uscourts .gov
i'tessage- Id: <603 71.94@cacd.uscourt.s . gOY:>
Bee: CRD... ?hill ips(:tcacd. USCOllrts. gov, CRD.~ woehrle.@cacd.1J9CCU::::tS.gov, 'l'ina Naghshir:eh@cac~.llscourt.s, gOY f jwp@paslaw.com , kti:i.carlo@c.mda-law.ccr.:., mwac
Suhj~cr.::Activity in Case 2:C8-cv-01.550:VAP-CW Joseph Ze:r~tik v . .:ri'~cqilel.ine Connor et iilMotion t.o Dismiss Case
Concen,:-<.ype: text!pla:i.n ...... *NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS .... • JUdicial Conference of the United States poLLey perm:Ll:.s attorl~eys of re~~ord and part.ies
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRM, DISTRICT OF CALIFO.R..."lIA
N·otice ot El.ectronic Fil.ing

The following t'.X"rJ...'lsaGtion was entered by Overton, Sarah on 6/19/2008 9:37
AI"! :PDT and filed ;;:~n fi/19/200a
Case Name: JOSeph Zernik v. ,r8cq;leline.connor et al

Case Number: 2: 08·cv-'l 550 https:!leef.cacd, uscourc~ .go:v!cgi-hin/DktRpt ,pi ?409918
F.~.ler: A1.1an Goodmar::.patricia CollillsGerald Rose!lbergJacq1.lcline CannorTerry

F::-ied"llan,rohn SegalLinda Hart.-Colenebb:i.e WittsVivian J51imeGregory O'Brlen
Document Nurr.ber: <?8

Copy the GRL addr:ess from the line b(~low inco the lor..:a.tion bar of. your Web
b:!:owser- to view the doc urr.en t : Document:; !lttps ! /ec~, cacd. uscou:cts .gov!doc1/03:'06104522 ?inagic_ni.lm~'MAGICScde_sj:!"q_n\lll1:
2BO&c,"",seid::::'109913
Dacite::. Text.:
NOTICE OF MOTION AND r·1QTION t.o Dismis$Case for p.Iainc::it/ ' (; finn
amended compL:iint: iil.?:d by defendant ?~tricia collins (individu;lUy) ,
Terry fl~iedman(individual1y), G€!::-ald Rosenberg (ind.ivio\laJ.1y), l),:!b::)ie Witts(individually~(
Vivian ~raime{individually), Grego:!:"y O'Brien\Retired ,ru~ge, ir.d_~ ... idu<:111y),
,:racquel ii"l.e Connor {indi vidua.1.ly} I Allan Goodman (i"divi dilall y) I ,roha Segal; indi vidua.Uy) ,
U,nda Ha::-t-C'ole(individually) , Motion set for heari'ng on 7/22/:lO0.3 ar. 10:00
AI"! befor-e Magi.st.rate ~rudge Carla woeh::-le. (Attach.~ents: M. (1; proposed Order) (Overton,
Sa:rah)
2: 08·'cv··,15S0 Notice l~as been electroni~ally rr.ailedto:
K"lt.hryn E DiCarlo kd1l::aI:·lo@cmda·la.w.com
SaI:ah L OveI:'ton sovertonacmda-law.com
,Jolm W Patt:.cn ,Jr jw-»0paslaW".com
Hichael L Wachte:i l f:lwachtel!.@bucl'lalter.com
2:08-cv-1550 Notice has been delivered by First Class 11. S. Mall or by

fax to:
,Joseph Ze.!nik
2415 Sai!"lt George Street
The following document", (9) are associated with r.his tnmsacticn:

Document'. descript.ion: MaL:n Document
O.:::'iginal tilemlme; S:\Cases\SLO - ,Judi.(;:ial Council\Zei'nik
'." Connor\r-1otion to Dismiss ~'Ae .pdf
81ectronic document: scamp:
[S'f1>.MP cacdSt.HIiP...J.Ih 10202 90914 fDate." 6/.1.9/20081 [Fil eNumber=fi03 7193-0j [c36geaa7S0c122tialdf 92 f6€81!4 84 4a! 29d! 03e1.e04a?ad'ln'70a.56~·225cf an '1cbS22h2S
Document: descripcion: pr:oposed O.rder·

Original filenmr.e: S:\Ca6eS\Sr~O ~ Judicial Counc.H\ze.rnik
v, Connor\proposed 02~der !"Ae.pdf
Electronic document stamp:
rSTAMP cacdHtamp_ID=10202 90 ~14 [Date,,6! 19 / 20CB] [Fi leNulllber=G03 7193-1] [b'74 50dl:t:91612c~e276b12d0870c86f.cfcd:~·~63:>:3f 61 c4o>aaSeeot f d3bOb94aef.'956cOf
1 of 1 12/29/2009 4:04 PM
- Califomia Central District - Display Receipt https:iiecf.cacd.circ9.dcnicgi-billiDisplayReceipt.pl?878076030230...
MIME-Vey.sian: 1. 0
F!'om:c'-l.cd ecfmailQlc:acd.uscQurts gOY
To: ecfnef@cacd.uscourts.gov
Message-.T.d; <6037255l~ca,cd.U~COar~s. gov>'
Tll1a...Naghshi.neh@ci:1ca.uscouI:"Cs.gov, jwp3f/e.slaw. com, k:J-icarlo@cm'::'a-law.com, If'lj.;aC
Bee: CRD..'phi 11 ips%cacd. USCOUI.-ts. gov, CRD_Woeh:'le@cacd.uscourt5.gov I
SubjeCt:Activity in Ca£le 2:Q8-cv-C15S0 .... VAP-CW Joseph :{ernik v ~racqueli.ne Connor et 011 'Motion to Dismiss Ca~e
contenc·.trype: tE>.xt!plain· ...NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USER~* •• JUdicia.l Conference of the unit.ed States policy permits attorrH.lYs of recoyd and par.cies
UN!'i'ED S'l'A'l'ES DIS1'RICT COU'R'r, CENTRAl, DISTRICT OF CAL1;FOFU'iIA
Not.ice of Electronic F11,1ng

The following t.ransaction was enl:ered by Overton, S~lrah on 6/19/2008 9:<16
AM PDT and tiled on 6!19!'J.008
Case Name: Joseph Zernik v. ,],1.ccuelir~e' Connor et <.'1.1

Case Number: 2; oa- cv-1S50 httpa :~/ !ec.f: ,cacd. u;s:;ourtg .gov!cgi-bin/DktRpt.. pI ?-109.no
Filer: ADR Services. Inc.
Document Number: 6.'9

Cr,)py the HR.L address from the line bel-ow into the loca:tion bar of your ~leb
browser to view t.he document: Document i https: / lec~. caCd. USCOllt:"tS .gov!doCl/03106104596?rnagic_num:;MAGIC&de .seq...num:;;282&caseid,,~C9n8
Docket Text;
NOTICE OF MOTION AND '~OTION to Dismiss :Case for plaim::~f:f's f.irst
a.mended complaint filed by defendant. A:.")R Services, Incl. (a9 a rx>rp·::n-ation) .
Mot.ion set. fOl· heal'in'] on ·'/22/2000 at,lO:CO AM before, Magist::,3.te ,1':,ldge Carla
Woehl·le. (Att.ach.rl'lelit~-{: # (1) p.ropcsed'Order) (Over.t;('Jn, S,u:a.h)
2:08··cv-1550 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Kathryn E Dlear'lo :<di,::arlo1fcmda~law.com
Sarah L Overton sO'len;onqC'.mda~law.cern
John W Patten. Jr jwp@paslaw.com
Michael L wachtell. 'flwachtellGbuc;,a] tel"'. com
2:08-cv-'i550 Notice has been delivered .by First Class 9'. S. Mad.l or by
fax to: :
Joseph Ze~nik
2·115 Saint George Stn~el:
r.,os rmgeles, CA 900L7
The following d()C~trilent (s) are associated with ::;.his tral;saction:

Document description: Main Document
Original fileuame: S: \Cases\SI.O Jud.icial Ccuncil\zernik
v. ADR\Mot::i.on t.o Dislr.:isa FAC.pdf.
Blect.:t:oni,"~ dccument S!::.amp:
[STAMP c~lcdSt~'l.ll':p... !:I:= 102029091·1 (Date=:6-! 1.9/20081 I,Pi leNumner=6( :~n64 - 0 J ISbale203Jb915f6c7bc591ESOb26eeOd10 f(:415 f79acOc2:lb6dfb5d1dl:.:'76a6a8eb.HCC15
Document descript.ion: proposed Order

Original filename; S: \Cases\SLO - JUdicial Courici.l\Zetnik
v j!o..DR\p:roposed Crdel~ ADR-FAC.pdf
.slectronic document. Stamp:
[STAMP cacdStamp....!D=10202:J091 <1 tl)a te=b!19!:OC8J [FileNumber:;;60]. 7~64 -ll [56f9Ce9f:i6eSOdU6 82.3 f}2S2eeal 751:2 f9a4aba9bbfbd984 E::'':Hl5ee4ccf2 5456d2586 9a~
1 of 1 12!29i2009 4:05 PM
- Caiifomia Central District - Display Receipt https:/lecfcacd.circ9.dcnicgi-biniDispiayReceipt.pi? 133025739784...
MIME- Ven,l ion: 1.0

From: cacd ecirnaillifcacd. \~3Court'.s gov
TO: ecfnef(~cacd. uscourts .gov
Message·· Id; .::6047687@caca.uscou:r:ts.gov>
Bec: kdicarlo@cmda-law.com , nef@cacd.ci:rc9 den
, j'Wp@pas]aw.co;n, m.....ach.tell@buchalter ,com, soverto!'l@cmda-law. com, c!~d... 'ph:i.l1ips@cac~ .1.~scourts .gov, crd ...ph:i 11.i.ps@cacd.uscour.ts .goV ...S\imry, r.ina...na
,Joseph l:err'lik
~~U5 Saint Geo't"ge Streer.
Los Ange les CA 9002"
US
Subject:Act:ivity in Case 2:08-cv-01.S50';'VAP-CW Joser;>h Zer:1ik v. ,J~cqueline Connor er.. al Minutes of In Chambel:s Order/D':'ri~Cth"e I~O proceeding hel
Content-Type: text/plain,*uNOTE TO puaLIC ACCESS USI~RS.*H ,Jud:i.cial Conterence of th.e United St'lt.CS policy per.mits au:urneys o~ record and parties
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I CENTRAL DIS'!'RICT OF CALIFO:.;I..N'!A
Notice of Eiectl·ollie Filing

"rhe following transaction was eat.e::ed on 6/20/2008 2:22 PM PDr alld filed
QI~ 6/612008
Case Name: Joseph Zernik v. Jacqueline·· Connor et.: al

Case Number: 2: 08-cv-1550 htt..ps: fleet, caed, useou:::-t.s .gov/egi· b:L:l!DxtRpt .pJ. 7<109918
Piler:
OOCU01C!lt Numbe.T.:'1O https:ileer..cacd.lwcourts, gov/doe:t/o31061I.S827?magic_num=r-<.AGIC&de_seq_nuru=284&Caseid=4C9918
copy t.he URI. address f.rom the line below into the location ba~ of you:: t';eb
brO\'1ser to view t!le document: '/0
Docket Text:
MINUTF:S OF IN CHAf.1BERS ORDER held befo(e t-1agistl:ate ,J~ldgf~ Car~a Wl;:H~hrle:
TWo mot.ions to dismiss the First Amended Compla.int wer~ filed on ,June 19,
~~~~. m~ri;~;e~~~~t:n~~c:~r~;~~e~~a;~~g'O~n~ll~~ ;;~e~~~ts(~~;lllC;:, 'H al.
2:0S-cv-lS50 Noti(;e has been elecr.roni(:ally mailed to:
,John W Pa::.ton jW"":?@paslaw,com
t':.icha<:~l L wachtell mwactltell@buchalter.com
Sarah L Overton 90verton@cmda··law.cotfi
Kachryn E DiCa:r.·lo };:dicarlo@cmda~la...",com
2: 03·· cv- lS50 Notice hus been delivered by l"irot class u. g. Ma:!.! ,:).r by
fax to;
Joseph Zernik:
2415 Saint George Street.
1,os Angeles ('.1\ 9002-1
tW
1 of 1 12/29/20094:05 PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt https:i/ccf.cacd.circ9.dcn/cgi-bin/DisplayReccipt.pI? 505403673 100 ...
M1ME·Version: 1.0
F:-c:n: cacd ecfrnai l@cacd.usco'.):r:t.s .gcv
To; eCfne.f@c3.cd.uscourts.gov
Message 'ld: ...· .6112 J2 6~cacd. usceurts . 9Qv.... "
Bee; kdicarlo@crncta-law.co:n . aef$<':acd..cirr.:9.d:.:t!
• ) \<o"p~asla\o.". com,
:nwacht.ell~buchalt:C:=.com, ~overtcn@C1!da-l.aw.corn, Jenr.a. rr,()lc.aw~kY'j~ryancave.com. c::td_phill.ip:>~cacd.usccur!:s. gov, crd_chill ips
.!OSeph Zeraik .
2·11S Si'lint George St.reet
Los Angeles C1\ 90021
u;;
Subjeci;.:Activity in Case 2:08-cv-015S0-vJ\P-CW aoseph ter~ik v. J2c(!Uelinc- Connor et al r"inutes o~ 1:1 Cha~bers order/Dir!!ctil.'C . no pr-oceed.i:lg nel
Contet:~-Type: t:extiplaio·"NO'r!! TO PUBLIC ACCBSS USBRS,..... • Jcdicii:l ·Ccnte:renc.e of ;;l,e !JJ:ited States yollCY !Je::mits it::.tQrueys of !'eco:-c d;""1d pa:-~ie!J
UNITED $T1CS:S DISTRICT COURT, ca~'!'RAL £lXSl'F.1CT OF CALr·FO:mrA
Notice of Elecr.ronic ?il ina

'rhc follo":Ni:lg r.r':;:lsaction was entered en 'liz/zona ·';';):6 PM PDT and filed
on 1/2/2COO
Case Name; Joseph z~... rl'!ik. v. ';iicquAline Connor et a1

C~~se Number: 2: OS-cv-1.550 ht tps: Ilee!:, cacd.. us courts go:v/cgi·t,i.c./Dkt.Rpr. ,pl'!409'HO
fliler:
Doc~ment Nurnber: 77 ht tps; I/ecf .cacd. 4,sc:ourts, govjdocJ./03106l5759a?m3g:i.c....nulT.,:MAGIC&de_~eq._n\lm=306&cc'lseid:::4C9918

copy th.e URI, address from r.he line b.e16..... into the locatiGn bat." of your web
i:rrO'.,fser to view the document: rl .
Decker. Text:
C-HNliTES OF IN CI-!AHi3ERS ORD[~R held bef.ot:e Mag'i5crar.e JUdgf~ Ca:d.l W,;,ehrle:TloI.-o
;'i'lo::.icm5 to dismiSH the First Amended Cotnplaint filed on ';/19/0:3, A thi:.d
I'iIction to dismiss the First. Amended COr;')pluiat. was file~ on 6/:N/O? and not-iced.
tor hea!'i.,g on August .1.8. 20013, The l10l iced hearing i!3 hereby ORDE:nED OFF-CALENDAR,
Plai.nt.iff 's opposition, or notice of nrJ.,-opposition, to this thLt'd
r:\Qt:i.cn shall be served and filed on or before 7/23/08. ·"'5gE O:i.QER ?OR !='UR'r~~E:R
Ot:'!'AltoS"'· tdt.;
2:08-CII-1550 Nol:ice ha.g bef>.r. elect:ronically mailed to:
.John \.. PaCt-on jwp3pilS law. con,
Michael L ~lachtell rnwachtell@buchalce,r.com
Sarah 1. Overtor. soverr.or.{olcmda-law.col!I
'::ef):ta Molda. ....- sky jen:aa.re.oldilwsky@brya..1Ca\rc.com
J<ath:-yc. B DiCar10 kdicarlo@':tr.da·,iaw,.com
2:08-cv-:1550 Notice has been delivered l:ly First Cla.ss U. S. Matl ()r by
fax to: :
Joseph Zer:'l ik
2.; lS Sair.t George Street
US
".
I of I 12i29f2009 4:08 PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt https://ecf.cacd.circ9.dcnicgi-biniDisplayReceipt.pJ? 103004569400...
MIME- Vcrs ion: 1 .0

From: cacd_ecfmai l@cacd. uscou!: ts . gOY
To: ecfnef@cacd.uscOU:ftS.gov
Mes9age-Id: <7~600:21(.}cacd.uscom:ts. gOIl>
Bf';C: djp@paslaw.com • .ienna.molda.....sky(~b!'yancave. com , :kdicar.Jo@c;mda-law.com 1 nef@caccl.'circ9.den
, jwp@paslaw.com, rr.wachcell(}buchalter. com, sovertoq@cmda-law.colO, crd_ohillips§cacd. uscot.:.:fts . <J ov , c.rd_phillips@cacd.llscc\:lrts.gcv..sumry. c1:d .......
Joseph zernik
24.1.5 Saint. George Street
Los Angeles C/\ 90027
us
SUbject:Activity in Case 2:08-r,;v-C155C..,VAP··CW J0geph Z.err!ik v . .:;a,cqueline Connor et al Order
Cont..er.t-Type: tex.t!pla.~.n""*NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USER$U. Judicial Conference of the Un:ited States policy permit!:! attGrl.:.eys of.recol·d and pardes
S'!'A'l'ES D.T.STRH..' T COURT, CENTRAf., DISTRICT OF CALIPORNIA
!,;'"NTl'ED
Notice ot Electronic Filing

The following tr.ansaction was entered on 3/18/2009 8:25 /'1.;.'\1 PD'r arrd filed
on 3/17!2009
Case Name: JoSepll Zer.nik v. Jacqueline Connor et al

Ca:::;e Number: 2:C8-cv-1550 http:::;:/jecf .cacd.uscourts gov!cgi··bi;1./DktRpt.pl"?409918
Filer ~
Document Number: 102 https:/ iecf.. cacd .uscourts. go~/dOC.1./0310·1:)77<515?magic_nun\;f':AGIC&de" . zeQ...Jlum,,374&Caseid:.;4 099.1.8
Copy the mu.. addn~ss from tlle line below into the lccuf.ion bar. of: your Web
b:rcwser to v ie-.w the dl;Jcurnent; 102
Dccket Texc:
QRDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQl,'EST TO DISQUALIFY THE HON. CARL:1\. ;'>lOi:;HRLB
~y ,Judge virginia A. ?hillips, l-e Scat.ement (;39}. Plaintiff. hal) f.\.Hed t.o
show g!"ounds tor disqualificatioa Ac.:cordiagly, t.he; Court DENIES r:he l'totion
to DlsquaLify (See document for specifics) CmrgoJ
2:08-cv-1S50 Notice ha.s been electronically mailed Co:
John. W !?acton jwp~aslaw.(:om
David J pasternak djp@""1?aslaw.com
Michael L Wachtell rnwachtell@buchalter.com
Sarah L Overton sover.tou@cmda-law,com
Jenna 1-lo1dawsky j enna . mo1.dawsky@bryancave,com
Kathryn E DiCarlo kdicarlc@cm<la-law.,com
2:0fl··cv~1.550 Not!C!C hus been delivered by l'irst Clasa O. S. Ktd.l oX'" by

fax to:
J'oseph 2.ernik:
Los Ange:i.es CJ'~ 90027
US
I of 1 12/29/20094:05 PM
- Califomia Central District - Display Receipt hltps:!/ecf.cacd.circ9.dcn/cgi-bi.n/DisplayReceipt.p1?478022462455...
MIME·· Vera ion: 1 . 0

Fr'om: <:acd ecfmail@cacd.u$cQu:r:ts. g~"Jv
'ro: ecfnet~cacd.uscourts. go'"
Message-' rd: <'7555211@cacd.usccurts.gov>,
Bce: djp@pa~,law.com I jerma.moldawsky@Oryancave.com , )cdicarlo@cmda-la\o1.corrt , nef@cacd.circ9.dcli.
, j YIp@pasla.w.com, mwach tel.U&bucha iter. com, sove:r.tot'~@cmda-law. corn, (;rd _phill ips(~cacd, uscou.rts . gO\l ,crdJhill ips@cacd. '~s<:ourt$ gov...sumry, erd._.. . .
,"Joseph Zel:nik
us
Subject:l'lctivity in Case 2:0a··cv-01550":'VA?-CW Joseph z.ernik v. Jacquell.ne CQnno~ et: al ,Notice of Report and Recorr.mendat:Lon
content-Type: tE'-xt/plainH*NOTE TO PUi.n~rc ACCESS USERS:~"'~ J\ldi:::ial Con1:erence of the unIted States policy permit.s attcn,e:rs of rec::;z.-d and part.:i.es
UNITED STATES DISTR!CT COUR'l', CKNTRAL DlS1'lucr Of C/U.IFOHlHA
Not.ice of Electroni.c Filing

'The following tr.ansaction was ente:red en. ~ 11/2009 '9. 35 .i~M PD·.r Md, filed
on 3/J1iZ009
Case Name: Joseph Zerrlik v. Ja<:quelineConnor et 0.1

Case Number; 2: 08 ·cv-..!.5S0 https:! feef .qacd. U5courts gov!eg,i- b:u<;,!DktRpt .p.l?,I0991 0
Filer:
Document Number: 103 https: f lect. cacd. usco\Jrts .gov./doCl /0310·n94·103imagi.c_ nUm'~MAG:rC&de.;_seq_num".1-n&caseid"409918
copy the URI" addr:esz :from the line below into the l'ocation bar ot yeu:::- Web
b:rowser to view t.he document: 103
Docket Text:
NOTICE OF FII.ING REPOR'r J'..ND RECOMMENDATION by r·1agi.s:trar.e Judge. Ca::-la l'loehrlJ;-l.
Objections to R&R due by 4/16/2C09 (Attiilchr:\ents: ff: ~l) i\:&R) {<It)
2:08-cv-15.50 Notice has been electronically ma.i.led to:
;John W Patton jwpi..itpaslaw.com
'David J Pasterna,k djp@paslaw.com
N ~chae 1 IJ Wacht".el.l mwachtell@huchaJ.ter ,com
Sarah L Overton soverton/§cmda-law. com
.J enna t>10 ldawsky j e!lr~a. moldawsky@bryancave.com
Kathryn E DiC,,~r:Lc kdicar.:;.O:~C:Tldc1.-1o.w.cor:l
2:08~cv'1550 Notice has been delivered by First Class o. s~ M~j.l ()r by

f"x to: :
,Joseph Zero ik
2115 Saint George StrE!et.
Los Angeles <;A 90027
US
101' 1 12/29/20094:06 PM
- Calilomia Central District - Display Receipt https:/!ecflcacd.circ9.dcnfcgi-binfDisplayReceipt.pl? 104321359055 ...
MlME~ Version: 1. C
f.!"cm:cacd ecf.mail<lcacd. u::;CQu:-t:g.gov
7'0 : ecf1"!.ef~cacd, U9~ourt s . gov
MeSS.:ige-Id: <755G251~...: acd.uscourts .g(')v:> ,
~cc: dj p:!pas law . com , jenna .moldawsky(itb.!"yancave .com I kdicarlc~cmda-law .r-om • r.ef9cacd .¢irc9 .den
, j wp$paslaw. co;n, mwacht.el l@buchalt:er .com, sovert:on~tnda-l3."'".COm, crd_phillips3ca.:d. '.Jscourt9 .gov, crd...phi11 ipSlKaCQ . !JSC':>U.I"tG 90vH.s\Jmry, c:-d ~.'"
Jr.HH.';>h'Zerr.ik
:Z'llS Saint George Street
Los A:Jye les CA 30027
liS
SUbject:Act.ivity in Cage 2:!)6-cv-01S50~VAP-CW.Joseph z.err.ik v. Jacquelinf'.: Connor et. al Report and ReccJ1\litendation ;!9~!I~ed)
COJite:-.t-1ype: text/pl:iin""NOTE TO ?tJ"BLIC ACCESS USEP..s:..... .JuUi::ial Conferel.CQ of the un:tted Sta~es policy pcrt!li~s at:to;:"!leys of reeved a:ld parties
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, C"~N'rAAL DISTRIC'i' C~' ou.rFCR.loi!A
Not H;e of El ~;:;t: :"o::ic Fi l i rig

°Tne following transaction was entered 011 4/3/2009 9.41. i\M pc'.r anj filed
er.. 3/31/2009
Case Niillle: Joseph ze:r.nik v. Jacqueline Connor et a!

Ca6e N\ur:cer: 2: 08-cv-155C nt tpn: II~cf. ~acd. U5COU!ts: .gcy"!egi-o;;.n./O.URpt .pl 1409918
Filer:
Documen.t Number: :,04 https:/lec!. cacd ~uscourt5 .gC\i/dOC1/0310·1'7a4146'?ma9ic_num=Ml\.G:rC&de~seq_num=379&caseid-,,409~18

Copy the URI. add::rcss ·Erora the :il~e below into the location bal: of your w.,b
browser to 'Inew the document.: 101
Docket:. 'text:
!~E:PORTr AND RECO:.'1ME~"DA'rION issued by Magiscrate ~r;;.dge Car~.a WO~~!l.I':le. GRAN'!'lN(;
MOT10N to Dismiss Case [or plaintiff's first <Amended complaint [69.! ~
MOTION t.o Dismi.ss Case!")), MOTION to n:l.9m.iGS CaGefo.rpjainti..~f.·~;
first amended compla.int (581, and MOTION :":0 oismiss CaG~ <:is F!:i(folm~s
First Amended Complainr.:[·10! Objectior~s :to R&R due oy 4/1E/2009 (dU
2: 08~cv-1550 Notice has beep.. elec~ro:\ica.lly mailed to:

,John W Patton jwp@puslaw.com
ca.vid J ?astexnak. djpfotpaslaw.colIl
Michael it wachtell mwachtellrhbtochalt.er .com
Sarah L Overton SO"'t.'rto!\(!Icmda-law.c~m·
Jer..."li,\ Molca',oIsky j er.r:a. ft',olcawsky~oryancave.corn
Kathry!l E OiCarlo kdlcarlo(~crnda·law.com
2:C8-cv··155C Notice hilS been delivered by First Class U. S. nj,l or by

fax to:
Joseph Zer.nil<.
;;1;415 Selin.!;. Geo:-ge StrEle\;.
Lcs A.'1.geles CA 90027
US
I of I 12/29/20094:06PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt https:!/ecfcacd.circ9 .dcn!cgi-bin/DisplayReceipt.p1'1879779377628 ...
tl!IME ··Versior:.: 1. ()
Fr.om: c:acd_ecfmail@cacd.Hscoun:s .gov
'1'<.): ecfne[@cacd.uscourts.gov
to1ess'lge·· Id: <7649384@cacd.usccurts.gov>
Bee: CRD_?hillips@(:acd.uscourts.gov , CRO...Woehr.le@cacd.uscQurts.go'J. djp@paslaw.com, jenna .moldawsky@bryancave. com, j wp~a51,3.'':. com, ~d:Lcal:lo(~cmda-l
S:Jbject:Activlty in Case 2:ca-cv~C1S50-:-VAP'-CWJoseph Z.eraik v. ,Ta,cquel.i.ne ConnQr et. al Notice (Other)
Con~ent-'!ype~ text!plain .... lII NOT8 TO FtIBLIC ACCESS USER.c;.~'*" ,Judi~ia.l Conference of the un,ited States poltcy pm.:mits atto:rneys of recor.d and partif~S
UNITED STATES D1STRICT COURr, CENTRAl, DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case Name: Joseph Zernik v. Jacqueline Conna:! et al

Ca.se Numbe"!": :2: 08·· ev- 1.550 https:lleef..cacrj _uscourts. gov/cgi -b:L1/DktRpt. pl '?409918
Filer: .Joseph zernik
Document. NUlnber: lOS

Copy the tJRL address tr.am the line below into the J.ocation bar of your web
br.Q.....ser. to view t.he document: Documen::.: https./Jeet-.cacd.u13ccu::-ts. gov/docl/0310788868D?magic_nlim"'MAGIC&de... .se..:L}:.u:'l1:~389&easeid::::-4Q9913
Docker. Text:
NOTICE of pJ.ainti1" l:' 5 veri f1ed requests filed by plainti 1=[ Jc~;epl1 zernik.
(dt)
2:00·,cv-1550 Not:ice has been electronically mailed to:
David ,J Past.ernak d:,pt~il.slaw.com
,Jerma Moldawsky j enrlH. ffi()l dawsky@b:cyancave. com
John W Patten ~]'r j"b'plljpaslaw.c()ffi
Kathryn E DiCarlo kdi~:a1.·lo@cmda··law.ccl'Jl
Michael L Wachtell mwaehteE@buchalr.er,cern
Sa:r.ah r. Ove.rton so"er~on@cmda.··l<lw.com
2:0S-<::v-l.'550 Notice ha.s been delivered by !'iJ:'st Class 0". S. Hail (lr by
fax to: :
~roseph Zern:i.k
:'05 A.ngeles, CA 90027
The following document-(s) are assoclated with this transaction:

Document desc:r-iption: Main Document .
Original filename: M: \POD13\Civil \LA08CV015S0CW-NTC.pdf
~~lectrcnic document Stamp! .
[$TA."'lP cacdSt.amp_ 1D",1020290914 (Date"'4/21/20C9] rFlleNumber='164 9383 -0 I [65 7e5.Eca9428eB7,fbfebe39geOa62dSGOa fb5e08S276dS3121bf2 53d8b;! .L5aaa95c40d87
1 of 1 12/29/20094:07 PM
- California Central District - Display Receipt lntps:!!ecEcacd.circ9.denicg i -binJDisplayReceipt.pl?22 S037205585...
MIME-Version: 1.0
:-r;oOr.l: cacc,_ecimailscacd, usco\~rts .gov i.
'ro: ecfnef@cacd. USC()U~ts.'lQV
Me~sage- rd: <"6'JSS15(~cacd~ U5courts. goy>
Bee: djp~aslaw.com • jerma.lIlo1c"..a.wsky@bryancave.com , ·kdicar1.o~mc:!.a-la...,.cor;; , nef~c3cd.·ci'!"c9.dcn
, j''''p~<1.s1aw. com, rnwa.::;:htell(:ijbuchl:il ter. corn, sovert.on:Bc:l'lda-!.).w. com, erc_phi ilipst§Cacd. uscourts .gcv, c:rd_'phillips~ca(~d.uscourts go ....$umry. c["d._"
";o!l~ph Zer:nik
2415 Saint. George St!:eet.
Los Angeles CA 90-027
US
$ubject:Activir.y in Cage 2;OQ-cv-Oi.5S0-VA?-CW Joseph Z,ernik Y. Jilcqueli.ne COnl~Ol' et al R&R Adopting Repo:"t and RecQl'!'.r.I(,!ndati-:;lls
ConLent-Type" tP..xt/plain*"uNO'ra TO PUBf.. rc A(...C ESS USERS,.... + Tnere is no cha.rge ::or vie.,..iug opinions.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. CEi."'"TRA1, :JIS'eRICT OF CAJ.JFORNIA
Nor.ice of Electronic fo'iling

The following transaction was entered ~n 1/24/2009 ,,: 16 PM PDT .utd f !.led
':::1:1 4/2:'/2009
Case Name: Joseph Zer:.'l.iJ<.. v. Jacqueline Conner et 0.1

Case Numbe:t': 2" 08··cv-15S0 https:/ieee.cacd. uscourt:~ .gov/egi -b:in/DKtRpt, pl.?109!J.1.8
FUel: :
OocUCJ!~nt Number: 106 https"//eet . cac(Ll"tGcou:rts . gov!docl/0310'N:.i. 72a2'?ifIa9ic_nu:tt:.MAO:i:C&de.;..st..><Lnum=391&Caseid:~4

:>9918
Copy t.he URi:. addr(~ss from ::he line below into ::he locac.ion bar of your. Web
browser to view the document: lOG
Docker. Text.:
mWER l\CCiiP'l'ING REPORT AND RECCMMENDA'I'ION ~").t 11ni ted St~t.E;~S Mag:t.st.;:ace lJ~ldge
by ,1udge Virgini,1 A. Phillips: IT IS ORDE;RED: (1) tha.t- tbe Report. and Recomrnenda1;ion
of r.he unit-cd States Magistrate Judge ~e accepted; (2~ t.hat DE!I:en:iaats l
CO\lr pending motio1i.S to dismiss (docket no. (681, f.ile<;i June l!!. :!OQS; docket
no, (69), f.iled J-ule ;;9, 2noH .. cocke:: :10. ''13:, fil'~d JUr'.e 30, 20tHI; 3.nd
docket: no. 1"781, tiled July 7, 2008) be:, grantL"Ci; 0') that t.he lI;'r"t Amended.
Complaint !dccket. roo. (fi2] , file<!. Ma.y 2"1, 20Q8) be dismi£sed -wi.th·:mt further
leave to arnend; and {~) r.hat judgmenr. be entered dismissing t.hts ·:tGt1on in
H.s cntlr'.,!'c-y, with prl~judlce as to £>laih:: if!: '$ damages: cla.irn.s l;nde.r
federal l.aw and without prejudice as to Plaintiff's da:ua.ges cJi;.ims unde:-
stat.~ la"l and his claims [or equitable reI ~ef. {pcl i
2:0e-cv'~15S0 Notice ~aa been electrOnically r..ailed tc::
John W Patton j",papas.law.com '
David J Pasternak <\jpQpaslaw. com
Mic.."hae.l L \iachtell mwachtell{4blicha] te;-. COt:'l.
Sarah L Overton :!Jov~:ctcnOik:r.l.da-law.com:
Jenn.a Moldawsky jE:!i\:n.a .:noldawsky'''bryancave. com
!<athryn E DiCarlo kdicarlo@crr;da-law.~cm
2:08-cv·1SSO Notice has been delivered. by Pirst Class . S. Mail 0:' by

fax to: :
Joseph ZC:L'n.:Lk.
2<il5 Saint George Street
r..-:>s Angeles CA ?0:)27
US
1 of 1 12/29/20094:07 PM
- Califomia Central District - Display Receipt https:!!ecfcacd.circ9.dcn!cgi-biniDisplayReceipt.pl?552355744138 ...
H!!'o1E-Version: 1. ()
-;"rom: cacd ecfmaiH~cacd.usccu:r:ts. gOY
To: eCfnef@cacd.uscour"::5.gov
Message" 10.: -<: 7675612@cacd.uscourts.gov>
Bee: djp@'paslaw.com , jenna.mQl.dawskyt~br.yancave.ccm I -kd.Lcaxlo@cnlda-~law.com , r:effK:acd.<.~irc9.dcn
, jwp@paalaw.com, mWi:lchtell@buchal!:er com, sovertonl;jcmda-law. com, crd ..,Phillips@cacd·. ~SCOUI:ts .gov J cr<l_phillips(a~-:acd. 'Js:~~,'"",.urts .gc·/'._su!n!'Y, cr:d_....
.Joseph Zernik
2415 SainI: Geo:'ge Street
us
Subject:Activ:i.t:y in Case 2:08-cY-01550":'VAP"CW ;roseph Z,crnik v. Ja,cqueline Connor et al !iudgment
Content-Type; text.!plain***NOTE TO PUBr,,:C ACCESS USERS,·*·Y The::,-:.! is no cha:r:ge for viewing. cpinio1l9.
UNI'!'E.'D STATES DISTRICT COURT. CEN'!'P.AI. DI."3TRH.."T OF ChJ~IFOR...~:tA

The {0110""':;':19 transaction was entered on 4/24/2009 4:23 PM PDT a."l.d filed
on 1/24/2009
Case. Name: Joseph Zernik v. Jacqueline Cor, nor. et al
Case Number.: 2: o({· cV-1550 htcps: / Ie.ef. caed. useourt.s .gcv/cgi -lnn!D!<.tRpt .pl?4 09918
r1 iler:
WARNING: CAE;E CL,O~mD on 01/24/2009
Document Number: :i.e7 https:/lee£.,cacd ,'uscourts .g0V;/doCl/0310·J 917.?S7?magic_l:1um".,MAGIC&de,seq_mltll:::394&ca6eid,~·1;)9918
Copy t.he URL "lddress i·rom the V,rle below i.nto the l"ocation bar of you:! Web
browser. t:o view the document.: 10'/
Docket 'rex t ;
,J1IDGHENT by Judge Vi:::Hillia A. Phillips::iT IS ADJOOCED: that th:.s :lc~icn is
dismissed with prejud:1,'ce .:IS to Plaintiffs damages claims under j;edeI·al law
and without prejudice as to his g,:.aCe law damages claims and bi.s ·:-:laims for
~qllitahle relief. (MD JS~6, Ca.se Ter.minated). {pelJ
2:08-cv-lS5C Neti~e has been electr.onically mailed :to:
~Tohn W Par.ton jw-!:?@pa~law.colll
David,;:; Pas:.:.ernak djp@paslaw.com
Michael :. \'iachtel1 mwachtell@buchalter.cem
S<.'\:1:"a11 L Overton sQverton@Cmda-law.cem
J<::mna Moldawsky j enna. mel dawsky@bryancave.com
Kathryn F': DiCarlo ~:diGa::r:lo@Cmda-law.com
2:0a·cv-1550 Notice has been delivered by P"irst Class U. S. Mail (.r by

fax eo: :
)oseph Zernik
241,::; Sai.nt George Screet
Lcs Angeles CA.. 90027
US
10f1 12/29/20094:07 PM
I, the undersigned Joseph Zernik, served the documents described as: 3: Verified Motion
for a Mandate in re: Zernik v Connor et al on parties in this action by a) emailing, and
b) by mailing a true copy thereof, which was enclosed in a sealed envelope, with postage
fully prepaid, addressed as follows:

(202) 514-3388
(202) 514-3309
(202) 514-3180
DepanrnnentofJustice

(213) 620-7772
(213) 620-7785
(213) 620-7751
White & Case LLP

Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the Court
Dawn Bullock, Records Supervisor (dawn_BuUock@cacd.uscourts.gov)
(213) 894-4727
correct.
Executed on December 27th , 2010,

Joseph Zernik
By: _
JOSEPH ZERNIK
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
RECEIVED
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK i':
u.s. COURT OF APPFALS
Case Nos 10-56634 and 10-56813
IN THE UNIED STATES COURT OF APPE~%> _ - - - - - -

FOR THE NINTH CIRCillT DOCKETED --OA"""'r"""'E- - INITIAL

vs

i
; .

4: INTERVENOR DR JOSEPH ZERNIK'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO

SHOW CAUSE IN RE: LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS V USA ET AL
Joseph Zemik, PhD

Digitally signed
Intervenor, In Pro Se by Jaseph Zernik
2231 South Court DN: cn=Jaseph
Zernik, a, au,
Palo Alto, CA 94301 ) .~ email=jz12345@
Telephone: (323) 521-6209 earthlink.net,
c=US
Faximile (213) 261-9881 Date: 201 0.12.27
jz12345@eartWink.net 14:58:27 +02'00'
4: MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ON THE USA AND LOG
CABIN REPUBLICANS IN RE: LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS V USA ET AL (2:04-
CV-08425) AND THE UNCERTIFIED OCTOBER 12, 2010 JUDGMENT - WHY
INSTANT APPEALS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF
JURISDICTION AND/OR MOOTNESS;
TO THE COURT AND TO PARTIES: Intervenor Joseph Zernik ("Zernik") herein files
his Motion for an Order to Show Cause on USA and Log Cabin Republicans in re: Log
Cabin Republicans v USA et al (2:04-Cv-08425) and the uncertified October 12, 2010
Judgment: Why instant Appeals should not be dismissed for lack ofjurisdiction andlor
mootness.
1. The concomitantly fIled papers should be deemed integral parts of instant
motion.
Concomitantly filed under separate covers, as integral parts of instant motion:
Intervene;
4: Motion for an Order to Show Cause on Log Cabin Republicans and the USA in
,..
re: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al and the uncertified October 12, 2010 f
i
i
Judgment - Why instant Appeals should not be dismissed for lack ofjurisdiction ii
i
i
I;.
andlor mootness;
i .
I
I
I~
2/9
3: MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE: LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS V USA ET AL
7: Motion for Declaratory Mandate in re: Establishment of CMlECF at the US
District Court through the General Order 08-02 amounts to Deprivation of
Rights;
8: Request for Incorporation by Reference, and
2. The NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing) - electronic certificates of
authentication! attestation by the Clerk - of the judicial and clerical records
from which the Appeals were taken were excluded from the PACER docket of
the District Court.
Pursuant to General Order 08-02, II. (0) of the District Court, the NEFs today serve
".
as the authentication records of the District Court (See also 5: Motion for Mandate: The
NEFs are Public Records).
However, all records in the PACER docket of Log Cabin Republicans v USA et ai,
including but not limited to the uncertified October 12, 20 I0 Judgment and Permanent
,
Injunction, were published without the respective NEFs. j..
3. Absent the electronic certificates of authentication!attestation (NEFs), all
judicial and clerical records in the case, from which the Appeals were taken,
should be deemed vague and ambiguous and/or null and void.
,
,"
3/9
Conditions were created, where the public cannot distinguish whether the judicial
li·
1
and/or clerical records in the PACER docket of Log Cabin Republicans v USA et ai,
including, but not limited to, the uncertified October 12, 2010 Judgment and Pennanent \
! .
Injunction, are valid and effectual, or null and void. Therefore, such clerical and/or
judicial records should be deemed vague and ambiguous and/or null and void.
4. Alternatively, the PACER docket of the case holds, even absent the NEFs,
sufficient evidence for the Court to conclude that the judicial records in the
District Court's case, including, but not limited to, the uncertified October 12,
2010 Judgment and Permanent Injunction, are vague and ambiguous and/or
nuU and void.
The following are some of the deficiencies noted in the PACER docket of the
litigation:
a) No record is available in the docket of the initial Complaint (Dkt #001), or of the
summons, as issued by clerk.
US law, 28 USC §1691 requires:
All writs and process issuing from a court of the United States shall be under the
seal of the court and signed by the clerk thereof.
The FRCivP, Rule 79: Records Kept by the Clerk (a)(I) and (a)(2), states:
(a) Civil Docket.

(1) In General.
The clerk must keep a record known as the civil docket in the form and manner
prescribed by the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts
with the approval of the Judicial Conference of the United States.
The clerk must enter each civil action in the docket. Actions must be assigned
consecutive file numbers, which must be noted in the docket where the first entry
of the action is made.
(2) Items to be Entered.
The following items must be marked with the file number and entered
chronologically in the docket:
(A) papers filed with the clerk;
(8) process issued, and proofs of service or other returns showing execution; and
(C) appearances, orders, verdicts, and judgments.
4/9 ,.i
t·
! -
! •
Therefore, it is claimed that the litigation was commenced out of compliance
with US law, and its docket, as published online in PACER is out of compliance
with the law.
b) No record is avaliable of execution/waiver of the service of the summons.

,.
The FRCivP, Rule 4: Summons (m), states:
(m) Time Limit for Service.

If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court
- on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff - must dismiss the action
without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a
specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must
extend the time for service for an appropriate period. This subdivision (m) does
not apply to service in a foreign country under Rule 4(f) or 40)(1).
Regardless, the complaint was not dismissed by the US District Court as
required by US law.
Therefore, it is claimed that the litigation was continued, following failure to
execute service of summons within the time prescribed by law, out of compliance
with US law.
,
c) No valid Assignment Order for a Presiding Judge is found in the docket. i'·
l.
J ••
Therefore, it is claimed that the two Judges, who appeared as Presiding Judges in
the case, did so with no authority.
d) The two Judges issued two opposing judgments: The first judgment, issued on
March 21,2006 by Judge George Schiavelli, was in favor of the United States of
America, and dismissed the Log Cabin Republicans' complaint. It was listed as
entered in the Judgment Index of the US District Court, and consequently the case
was deemed "closed". (Dkt #34)
No appeal or other procedure overtunred the 2006 judgment.
5/9
The second judgment, issued over four years later, on October 12,2010, by
Judge Virginia Phillips was in favor of the Log Cabin Republicas. The October
12, 2010 Judgment was not listed as entered in the Judgment Index of the Court.
e) The Clerk of the US District Court refuses to certify the docket of the case.
f) The Clerk also refuses to permit public access to electronic certificates of
authentication/attestation (NEFs) of the two judgments, in apparent violation of
First Amendment rights.
Therefore, all judicial and clerical records in the online PACER docket of Log Cabin
Republicans v USA et al (2:04-cv-08425) should be deemed vague and ambiguous and/or
null and void.
5. Evidence from the cases incorporated by reference, shows that in other PACER
dockets in the US District Court judicial and clerical records were published,
including Judgments, which should be deemed null and void.
Two other cases at the US District Court, Central District of California, were
incorporated by reference: Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) (See also - 3: Motion
for Mandate in re: Zernik v Connor et al and Exhibits 3:1,2,3,4) and Fine v Sheriffet al
(2:09-cv-01914). (Exhibits 4:1a,b,c)
In both cases, the evidence shows that judicial records, including but not limited to
judgments, were listed as 'entered' in the respective online PACER dockets, while only
invalid NEFs were issued by the Clerk of the Court.
In both cases, the Clerk of the US District Court refuses to certify the PACER
dockets.
6/9
6. Parties in the Appeals in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al failed to respond on
request to produce copies of the certificate of the October 12, 2010 Judgment.
In view of the facts stated in paragraphs 1-5, above, requests were forwarded on
December 6, 2010, to parties in the Appeals (Exhibit 4:2) to provide copies ofthe
certificates - the NEFs - of the two contradictory Judgments in Log Cabin Republicans v
USA eta!.
No response on the matter has been received from the Parties.
7. The Clerk of the US District Court also failed to respond on request to provide
copies of the certificates - the NEFs - in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et ai, and
also failed to respond on request to certify the respective PACER docket.
In view of the facts stated in paragraphs 1-6, above, requests were forwarded on
December 9,2010, to the Clerk of the US District Court (Exhibit 4:3) to provide copies
of the certificates - the NEFs - of the two contradictory Judgments in Log Cabin
Republicans v USA et at and also to certify the online PACER docket in the case.
No response on the matter has been received from the Clerk of the Court.
8. The evidence should lead the Court to rule that both the uncertified March 21,
2006 and the uncertified October 12, 2010 Judgments are vague and ambiguous
and/or null and void judicial records.
In view of the facts outlined in paragraphs 1-7, above, both the uncertified March 21,
2006 Judgment (Dkt #024) and the uncertified October 12, 2010 Judgment (Dkt #252)
should be deemed vague and ambiguous and/or null and void judicial records.
9. The US Court of Appeal should not conduct Appeals from an uncertified
Judgment.
7/9
Conditions were created, where a docket was opened at the US Court of Appeals for
Appeals from an uncertified Judgment, which is vague and ambiguous and/or null and
void.
Under the circumstances, it is likely that the US Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction
in the Appeals in question, alternatively, that the Appeals are moot.
enter an Order to Show Cause on both Log Cabin Republicans and the USA in
re: The uncertified October 12, 2010 Judgment - Why the Appeals, now pending,
should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and/or mootness.
For the reasons listed in paragraphs 1-9, above, the Court should enter the Order to
Show Cause on both Log Cabin Republicans and the USA in re: The uncertified October
12,2010 Judgment - Why the Appeals, now pending before the court, should not be
dismissed for lack ofjurisdiction and/or mootness.
Dated: December 27 th , 2010 Joseph Zernik
By: _
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
LIST OF EXIDBITS
Exhibit4:1- Fine v Sheriffetal (2:09-cv-01914):

a) The March 19120,2009 Petition for Habeas Corpus (Dkt #01) (face page), and the
respective NEF, bearing the 'electronic document stamp', as required by General
8/9
Order 08-02 for valid electronic certificate of authentication/attestation;

b) The June 29, 2009 Judgment (Dkt #31). Upon inspection on December 29,2009,
the respective NEF, was discovered to be missing the 'electronic document
stamp'.
c) The February 18,2010 Mandate (Dkt #59) as docketed in the US District Court-
with no certification by a Circuit Judge and with no NDA (Notice of Docket
Activity) from the US Court of Appeals, and the respective NEF, bearing no
'electronic document stamp' .
Exhibit 4:2 - Log Cabin Republicans v USA et at (2:04-cv-08425):
December 6,2010, request upon counsel of parties in the Appeals to provide copies
of the NEFs in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et at in the US District Court, and
confirmation of receipt by counsel for the USA.
Exhibit 4:3 - Log Cabin Republicans v USA et at (2:04-cv-08425):
December 9,2010, request upon Clerk ofthe US District Court Terry Nafisi to
provide copies of the NEFs and certify the PACER docket.
I, the undersigned, Joseph Zemik, read instant Intervenor's 4: Verified Motion for an
Order to Show Cause in re: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et ai, and I know the
content thereof to be true and correct, it is true and correct based on my own personal
knowledge, except as to those matters therein stated as based upon information and
belief, and as to those matters, I believe them to be true and correct as well.
pursuant to the laws of the United Stateso
Executed on December 2ih, 2010.
).~
Joseph Zemik
9/9
I o.
EXHIBITS
.,
EXHIBIT 4:1
Case: 10-56634 01/06/2011 Page: 12 of 34
Mar 19 2009 1l:5?AM f}~TJ NAFTRLIN
Case 2:09-cv-01914-J_FV;V-CW Document 1
:;
RIC/dibeb I,. FIN£.

NAME
I;)OOXflUCr -if/: /B:z.~4-3 G1-
PRISON IDl!NTIFlCATlONmOOKING NO.
TWIN 7li'Wf?&£ CllJf~cn~{VJJ<- fi'1aurt'
ADDRIiSSORPLACEOFCONFrNEMENT
4dr; Bw'alff..tr'i t,(JJ ~f. elf- '1!JtH';Z-'

Not« It is yOIU responsibility lC nafilY the Clert bf Ccrort tn w:it!ng of 4."1y
changcofadaoss. !fll:llIeSC:Ile4 1>:1 an ammcy. ~ro,i~ bil ullmt>.
add:reM, :elq>ll00l) a:l<llllcsimile numben, lll1<.1 c·",~il t:1!dteu.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRIct OF CALIFORNIA
.~ ; lC~~E NUMBER:
'kV09 1914~ DI
to oUl1{lj)lieo.lby lbeCleltorlbeUDiUd Slall:S Dlattiet
". o _ _ _ _ _ A.~El\'DED
j
I! PETITION FOR WlUT OF HABEAS CORPUS
BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY
A._ J')....... 28 U.S.C. § 2254 V £)J!; .".r-
NAMij OF WARDml. SL1'F.lUNTENDFNT, JAltoR Oil AUTHORJzeO
PRRSON HAVING CUSTODY OF PETlTIONBR ! n'¥U ~Vf!.sr-r;Je 'G:A1&e6fiNC.J, ~,;;r-
Respondeat. i PLACErCOUNTY OFCONVICTJON PJ.f ~S
: PREVrO'(;'SLY !'!Leo. RllLAiEO Ci\SES IN nns DISTRICT COURT
: (1.1.<111)' ~g.'" "Nm~r}
lev
lev
I~S'J'RucnONS * PLEASE READ CAREFULLY
l. To ~ this fO!m you must be Ii person who either is Imrrently serving e. sentence under a judgment against you in 11 Califumia.
slate court. or will be s~tving (l sentence in the future under a judgment against you in a. California state CQUO. YOll are asking fur relief
from the conviction andior the sentence. -i1ti s fomt i~ )'Our petititm fur relief.
2. In this petitiOll, youmay chdlenge Illejud!1llent entertld by unlyQue California slaw court. If yo~ want to challenge the judgmer.t
entered by a different Califomia state court, you muSl me Il septml:e petition.
3. MlOO: sure the foern is typed or ncdy handwriuen. You must tell the truth and sign the form. [fyou make a false statement of
11 m8.1erinl fact, yOll may be proscml£::<.l for pCljury.
4. Answer all lit\: questions. You <it, net need tv ti~~se Ia-w. but you do nee<! ~ sUtte the federal legal theory and opemtiv~ facts
in supJl{lft of eath ground You may submit additional pages if nece3Ssry. If >,OU do not fill om the fonn proP(,,-Iy, you will be asked t{)
sllbmit additioDal or correct intOrmlition. if you WIlJl! to sulmnt a legal briefor nrguments, you may attach II separa1e memorandum.
S. YO\! must in4:1ude til this pelitiGI11!U the gt')unds for relieffrom the convletiOl] and/or &entcnc~ that yO\! challenge. And roo must
'I8te the f8¢ts thllt S',li'P<l>rtCllch ground. Ifyou fail to s~t f¢r'.h aU tll.e groJl'lth:11 this petition. yoo may be barred from presontingadditional
grounds at a later dale.
5. You must pay a feeof$S.OO. rf~be 1ee is paid. ycurpctiiicn wilt be filed. If you cannot afford tie fee,you may ask to t)!Ol:ee!l
fitfOrma paU{Jeri.~ (as a peor pers<m). To de thal, yO\! !!lUSl fiU oul a."d sign the decla.ratio:l ofthe last two pages of the f<lJm. Also, you.
must have lUl authorit.ed officer attheo penal institution Goolplere the certificate as to the amOun1 \)1moneyand securities on deposit to YO\lI"
credit in My flCcoum ai the il'lSlitutinn. If y('urpriwn ucc{.'un~ t:.xcec:ds $25.(10, you muslpay the filing fee.
6. When yuu ha;v., romplet<:d tile bern, send lhe original nnd two c;>p·.es to the following llddr~gs:
C\i?rk d :he Ummd States DiSH itt C()~lTt for t1:~ Ccntnl District of California
United Smt~ COllrdlou3'~
/l. TTN: Illtake!J.)(;Ket Sezticn
312 Noeth Sprillg Street
1,<)8 A..1gdes. California 90012
Page 1 of I!)
; .
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1. Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered on 3/24/2009 at 8:32 AM PDT and filed on 3/19/2009
Cnse Name: Richard 1. Fine v. Sheriff of Los Angeles County
Case Number: 7:09-cv~1914
Filer: Richard 1. Fine

Doc:ument Number: 1
Docket Text:
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case
assigned to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and referred to Magistrate Judge Carta
Woehrle. (Filing fee $ 5: FEE PAID.), filed by petitioner Richard I. Fine.
(Attachments: # (1) Part 1 of Petitioner, # (2) Part 2 of Petitioner, # (3) Part 3 of
Petitioner)(ghap)
2:09-cv-1914 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2:09-cv-1914 Notice has been delivered by First Class U. S. Mail or by fax to: :
Richard 1. Fine
BK# 1824367
Twin Towers Correctional Facility
450 Bauchet Street
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:

Document description:Main Document
Original fJIlename:M:\CV Case Opg\LA09CVOl9l4CW-2254-1.pdf
Electronic document Stamp:
EST AMP cacdStamp_ID= 1020290914 [Date:3/24/2009] [FileNumber=7490322-0]
(bale4c9adce56e6928dOecfa53c4bOc8I0443abc5deee0572f9a7b6bbda4fa2e964b
b0508 t249c09cc401bdf093 6e6483e4a54078340270 l3ddd6569207b4d9a]]
Document description: Part 1 of Petitioner
OriginallfiiJename:M:\CV Case Opg\LA09CV01914CW.2254-2.pdf
[STAMP cacdStamp_JD= J 020290914 [Date:3/2412009] [FileNumber=7490322-I]
[b5J78e40dclb3d164887a5416571dd26cbfu9daSa6aff02bd7c7de078d36a50c4601
16 706c9b7fec55bgeIDe 1416b7bb31 ebOfb 73e62222dc6ffc3bdd8280 187]]
I'
I
Original filename:M:\CV Case Opg\LA09CVO 1914CW-2254-3.pdf

[STAMP cacdStamp_ID= 1020290914 [Dale=3/24/2009] IFileNumber=7490322-2]
[48gel blOl209abage55 154c2000c6c375dc8ecb578c32cfa9a4287ce4f4902b03012
15a6d8d5 f736cO 1ca465d060flJa320cbcai978bd5f2bc7a8aa05884c4835]]
Orit,rinal filename:M:\CV Case Opg\LA09CV01914CW-2254.pdf
[STAMP cacdStamp_ID=1 0202909J 4 [Date=3/24/2009] [FileNumber=7490322-3)
[6b8fOb48200I 32bOc8e7f66779bc4I 96a4de5ec4e85983lOa6aeab9884762e28e4a4
Ofb75e37052aeSt"383d597f'2c7da70ebdb70ce552tcOfbdb Ife783fl816c]]
'.
f"-
Case 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW Document 31 Filed 06/29/2009 Page 1 of 1
6 JS-6
7

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12 RICHARD I. FINE, ) No. CV 09-1914-JFW(CW)

)
13 Petitioner, ) JUDGMENT
)
14 v. )
)
15 SHERIFF LEROY D. BACA, et al.,)
)
16 Respondents. )
---------------)
17
18 IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is

19 denied and the action dismissed with prejudice.
20
21 DATED: June 29, 2009
22
23
24 Judge
.~
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED
FEB 182010
MOLl.Y C. DWYER. CLERK
u.s. COURT OF APl'EAlS
RICHARD I. FINE, No. 09-56073
Petitioner - Appellant,
D.C. No. 2:09-cy..()l914-JFW-CW
Y. U.S. District Court for Central
California, Los Angeles
SHERIFF OF LOS ANGELES RECEI'{~O
ClEltl{. u.s. DISTRlGr COURT
COUNTY; et al., MANDATE
.. '
Respondents - Appellees. fEB , 8 2010

iruw. D15T1~CAufORNIA
.. t)QPlITY
."
The judgment of this Court, entered December 16,2009, takes effect this
date.
This constitutes the fonnal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule
41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
FOR THE COURT:
Molly C. Dwyer
Clerk of Court
Gabriela Van Allen

Deputy Clerk
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 162009
MOLLY C. DWYER. CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
RICHARD I. FINE, No. 09-56073
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW
v.
MEMORANDUM·
SHERIFF OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY;
et ai.,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California
John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 10, 2009** I·.

!.
Pasadena, California
Before: REINHARDT, TROTT and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Richard Fine appeals from the district court's denial of his petition for
habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affinn.
,.i
I
I
• This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
i,.
II .
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. I .
I,
I
i
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without I
I·
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). I
It· .
I
I
I
i,.
The district court correctly concluded that Los Angeles Superior Court
Judge Yaffe~s refusal to recuse himselffi:om Fine's contempt proceedings was not
"contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application ot: clearly established federal
law H or an "unreasonable determination of the facts." 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); see
also Jones v. Ryan~ 583 F.3d 626, 636 (9th Cir. 2009) (de novo review). Ajudges
failure to recuse himselfresults in a constitutional violation where "the probability
of actual bias on the part of the judge or decisionmaker is too high to be
constitutionally tolerable." Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., 129 S. Ct. 2252,
2257 (2009) (citation and quotation omitted). Fine asserts that Judge Yaffe was
intolerably biased because he received employment benefits from Los Angeles
County, a party to the underlying litigation. However, unlike the circumstances of
Caperton, Judge Yaffe's receipt of these benefits did not give him a "direct
personal, substantial, pecuniary interest" in the matter. [d. at 2259 (citing Tumey v.
Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927). Nor was Judge Yaffe so "personally embroiled" that
he could not preside impartially. Crater v. Galaza, 491 F.3d 1119~ 1132 (9th Cif.
2007). Fine's argwnent that he "exposed" Judge Yaffe for receiving "criminal
payments" is belied by a Califomia statute expressly providing that judges "shall
continue to receive supplemental benefits from the county or court then paying the
benefits." See Cal. Gov. Code § 68220; see also Sturgeon v. County ofL.A., 84
2
Cal. Rptr. 3d 242 (2008) (rejecting taxpayer's contention that judicial
compensation was an unconstitutional waste or gift of public fimds, but fmding
that judicial compensation required statutory prescription).
AFFIRMED.
..
'j
3
iml:fHl'~)}ijc (~-maii
mCS!;ilge :~cnerat€d Hie C,';Vf~:CF system. Pi£msc DO
H, c.. ~m}U hcclluse the mail box is l.mattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States
policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to
receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by
law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later
charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the
referenced document is a tTanscript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
I. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
The foHowing transaction was entered on 2/23/2010 at 3: 15 PM PST and filed on 2/1812010
Case Name: Richard I. Fine v. Sheriff of Los Angeles County
Case Number: ~;Jt~::"sv-019t4...)FW~CW
Filer:
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 06/29/2009
~.". 9
Document Number:-
Docket Text:
MANDATE of 9th CCA filed re: Petition for Certificate of Appealability[34], CCA #
09·56073. The Decision of the District Court is AFFIRMED. Mandate received in
this district on 2118/2010. (Ir) ..
I
2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW Notice has been eJectronicaUy mailed to:
Kevin M McComuck kmccormick@bentonorr.com
Aaron Mitchell Fontana afontana@lbaclaw.com. bmoyer@lbaclaw.com
Joshua Lee Ros(,'1l jrosenJaw@ca.rr.com
2:09-cv-01914-JFW-CW Notice has been delivered by First Class U. S. Mail or by fax to: :
Richard I. Fine
BK# 1824367
Twin Towers Correctional Facility
450 Bauchet Street
US
EXHIBIT 4:2
10-12-06 Log Cabin Republicans v United States of America et aJ (2:04-

cv-08425) Request forwarded to Counsel for Log Cabin
Republicans and the USA for copies of the NEFs, and confirmation
of receipt by Counsel for the USA
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19: 11 :54

To: dwoods@whitecase.com, pau1.freebome@usdoj.gov, trusche@seyfarth.com,
aakahn@whitecase.com, emiller@whitecase.com, faen11e-rocha@whitecase.com,
patrick.hunnius@dlapiper.com, shameed@whitecase.com,
joshua.e.gardner@usdoj.gov, ryan.parker@usdoj.gov, scott.simpson@usdoj.gov
From: joseph zemik <jzI2345@earthlink.net>
Subject: Request for copies ofNEFs in Log Cabin Republicans v USA (2:04-cv-
08425) at the US District Court, Central District of California
Daniel J Woods
White & Case
633 W 5th St, Ste 1900
213 -620-7772
Email: dwoods@whitecase.com.
Paul G Freeborne
US Department of Justice
PO Box 883
Washington, DC 200444
202-616-8330
Email: paul.freebome@usdoj.gov
Timothy Michael Rusche

Seyfarth Shaw
333 South Hope Street
Suite 3900
213-270-9662
Fax: 213-270-9601
Email: trusche@seyfarth.com
Aaron Alexander Kahn

White and Case
633 West Fifth Street, 19th Floor
213-620-7751
Fax: 213-452-2329
Email: aakahn@whitecase.com
Devon Anne Myers

White and Case
633 West 5th Street, Suite 1900
213 -620-7700
Earle D Miller
White & Case
633 W 5th St, Ste 1900
213 -620-7700
Email: emiller@whitecase.com
Fernando L AenUe-Rocha
White and Case
633 West Fifth Street Suite 1900
213-620-7700
Fax: 213-452-2329
Email: faenlle-rocha@whitecase.com
.,
Patrick 0 Hunnius
DLA Piper LLP (US)
1999 Avenue of the Stars
4th Floor
310-595-3030
Fax: 310-595-3330
Email: patrick.hunnius@dlapiper.com
Sayema Javed Hameed

White & Case
633 W 5th St, Ste 1900
213-620-7700
Email: shameed@whitecase.com
I
I
i· ::
'.
Daniel J Woods
Paul G Freeborne
Timothy Michael Rusche
Joshua Edward Gardner

United States Department of Justice
20 Massachusetts Avenue NW
202-305-7583
Email: joshua.e.gardner@usdoj.gov
Ryan Bradley Parker

US Department of Justice - Civil Division
20 Massachusetts Avenue NW
202-514-4336
Email: ryan.parker@usdoj.gov
W Scott Simpson
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Division - Federal Programs Branch
Post Office Box 883
Rm7210
202-514-3495
Email: scott.simpson@usdoj.gov
RE: Request for copies ofNEFs in Log Cabin Republicans v USA

(2:04-cv-08425) at the US District Court, Central District of
California
To Attorneys for Log Cabin Republicans and United States of America:
Please notice records and press release, posted online and linked below,
which highlighted the dubious nature and/or invalidity ofjudicial records
in the litigation, referenced above.
The US District Court, Central District of California, has routinely

denied access to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing), which are
likely to be in your possession. Such records are public records by law,

and are essential for the public to discern the true nature of the litigation.
Please also notice in the records linked below documentation of another

case, involving Judge Virginia Phillips, where government officers and
Bank of America Corporation were named Defendants, and where she
issued false and deliberately misleading records with invalid NEFs.
For all the reasons listed above, your cooperation is kindly requested in
expediently providing copies of the NEFs of the Complaint (Dkt #1), and
all later records, which were docketed by the Court (no copies are
requested ofNEFs docketed by counsel for either Plaintiff or
Defendants), in the caption referenced above.
Truly,
)'~l.
Joseph Zemik, PhD
LINKS
[1] 10-12-06 Dont Ask Dont Tell Another Pretense Litigation by Judge Virginia
Phillips at the US District Court, Central District of California?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44771304/
[2] 10-12-06 Log Cabin Republicans v United States of America et al (2:04-cv-
08425) at the US District Court, Central District of California - Don't Ask Dont
Tell- litigation records
[3] 10-12-05 Request for investigation, impeachment proceedings where
appropriate, in re: US Judges JED RAKOFF, VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, JOHN
WALTER, and US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE for conduct, which
undermined Banking Regulation and/or Human Rights in the United States
[4] 10-12-04 RE: US Judges JED RAKOFF, VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, JOHN
WALTER, US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE - Request for Investigation,
Impeachment Proceedings Where Appropriate
http://www.scribd.com/doc!44669382/
Human
Rights
Nett
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human
Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los
Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of
computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice
system in the United States.
Visitor loc$tf1)I'lS
http://www.scribd.comIHuman Rights Alert

http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Subject: Read: Request for copies ofNEFs in Log Cabin Republicans v USA
(2:04-cv-08425) at the US District Court, Central District of California
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:41:49 -0500
X-MS-Has-Attach:
Thread-Topic: Request for copies ofNEFs in Log Cabin Republicans v USA
Thread-Index: AcuVaxTGR22NJxc/Su6eujJgqGpQhgAAceXm
From: "Freeborne, Paul (CIV)" <Pau1.Freeborne@usdoj.gov>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Dec 201017:42:41.0655 (UTC)
FILETIME=[FB5FB070:01CB956C]
engine=2.50.1 0432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 defmitions=2010-12-06_11 :201 0-12-
06,2010-12-06,1970-01-01 signatures=O
engine=2.50.1 0432:5 .2.15, 1.0.148,0.0.0000 defmitions=20 10-12-06_11 :2010-12-
06,2010-12-06,1970-01-01 signatures=O
X-ELNK-AV: 0
Your message
To: dwoods@whitecase.com; Freeborne, Paul (CIY);

trusche@seyfarth.com; aakahn@whitecase.com; emiller@whitecase.com;
faenlle-rocha@whitecase.com; patrick.hunnius@dlapiper.com;
shameed@whitecase.com; Gardner, Joshua E (CIY); Parker, Ryan (CIV);
Simpson, Scott (CIY)
Cc:
Subject: Request for copies ofNEFs in Log Cabin Republicans v USA
California
Sent: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:11:54 -0500
was read on Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:41:49 -0500
Final-Recipient: RFC822; PFreebor@CN.USDOJ.GOV

Disposition: automatic-actionlMDN-sent-automatically; displayed
X-MSExch-Correlation-Key: W+L52GIPyOq6acU6D90mYg=
Subject: Read: Request for copies ofNEFs in Log Cabin Republicans v USA
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:48:39 -0500
X-MS-Has-Attach:
Thread-Topic: Request for copies ofNEFs in Log Cabin Republicans v USA
(2:04-cv-08425) at the US District Court, Central District of California ..
Thread-Index: AcuVaxTGR22NJxc/Su6eujJgqGpQhgAArvka
From: "Parker, Ryan (CN)" <Ryan.Parker@usdoj.gov>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Dec 201017:48:40.0215 (UTC)
FILETIME=[Dl179A70:01CB956D]
engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15, 1.0.148,0.0.0000 defmitions=2010-12-06_11 :2010-12-
06,2010-12-06,1970-01-01 signatures=O
engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 defmitions=201 0-12-06_11 :2010-12-
06,2010-12-06,1970-01-01 signatures=O
X-ELNK-AV: 0
Your message
To: dwoods@whitecase.com; Freeborne, Paul (CIV);

trusche@seyfarth.com; aakahn@whitecase.com; emiller@whitecase.com;
faenlle-rocha@whitecase.com; patrick.hunnius@dlapiper.com;
shameed@whitecase.com; Gardner, Joshua E (ClV); Parker, Ryan (ClV);

Simpson, Scott (ClY)
Cc:
Subject: Request for copies ofNEFs in Log Cabin Republicans v USA
California
Sent: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:11:54 -0500
was read on Mon, 6 Dec 201012:48:39 -0500
Final-Recipient: RFC822; RParker@civ.usdoj.gov

Disposition: automatic-actionlMDN-sent-automatically; displayed
X-MSExch-Correlation-Key: W+L52GlPyOq6acU6D90mYg=
"
EXHIBIT 4:3
10-12-09 Log Cabin Republicans v United States of America et al (2:04-

cV-08425) Request forwarded to Clerk of the US District Court Terry Nafisi
for copies of the NEFs, Certification of the PACER docket
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:32:19

To: "Terry Nafisi, Clerk ofthe Court" <terry_nafisi@cacd.uscourts.gov>
From: joseph zemik <jz12345@earthlink.net>
Subject: Timely response requested Fwd: RE: Log Cabin Republicans v United
States of America et al (2:04-cv-08425)
Cc: "Attention Hon Audrey Collins, Chief Judge"
<Angela_Bridges@cacd.uscourts.gov>, "Dawn Bullock, Records Supervisor"
<dawn_Bullock@cacd.uscourts.gov>, "Sharon McGee, Intake Unit
Supervisor"<Sharon_McGee@cacd.uscourts.gov>,
<Donna_Thomas@cacd.uscourts.gov>, "Theresa Doty - Chief Deputy Clerk"
<Theresa_Doty@cacd.uscourts.gov>, <Lydia_Yurtchuk@cacd.uscourts.gov>,
"Smith, Darcy $USMS$" <Darcy.Smith@usdoj.gov>, "Shell, Thomas$USMS$"
<Thomas. Shell@usdoj.gov>, dwoods@whitecase.com,
pau1.freebome@usdoj.gov, trusche@seyfarth.com, aakahn@whitecase.com,
emiller@whitecase.com, faenlle-rocha@whitecase.com,
patrick.hunnius@dlapiper.com, shameed@whitecase.com,
joshua.e.gardner@usdoj.gov, ryan.parker@usdoj.gov, scott.simpson@usdoj.gov
Dear Clerk Nafisi:
Given that the matter, outlined below, is of considerable public interest, and given
that a Notice of Appeal was filed in this case, timely response by your office,
within 7 days, is kindly requested.
Truly,
).~l
Joseph Zemik, PhD
Human
Rights
Alelt
Hwnan Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human
Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los
Angeles County, California, and beyond. Hwnan Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of
computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the
justice system in the United States.
Visitor locations
http://www.scribd.comIHuman Rights Alert

http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:18:18

To: "Terry Nafisi, Clerk of the Court" <terry_nafisi@cacd.uscourts.gov>,
Subject: RE: Log Cabin Republicans v United States of America et al
(2:04-cv-08425) - Request for copies of attestations by the Clerk of the
Court of the two contradictory judgments in the case.
Cc: "Attention Hon Audrey Collins, Chief Judge"
<Angela_Bridges@cacd.uscourts.gov>, "Dawn Bullock, Records
Supervisor" <dawn_Bullock@cacd.uscourts.gov>, "Sharon McGee, Intake
Unit Supervisor"<Sharon_McGee@cacd.uscourts.gov>,
<Donna_Thomas@cacd.uscourts.gov>, "Theresa Doty - Chief Deputy
Clerk" <Theresa_Doty@cacd.uscourts.gov>,
<Lydia_Yurtchuk@cacd.uscourts.gov>, "Smith, Darcy $USMS$"
<Darcy.Smith@usdoj.gov>, "Shell, Thomas$USMS$"
<Thomas. Shell@usdoj.gov>, dwoods@whitecase.com,
paul.freebome@usdoj.gov, trusche@seyfarth.com,
aakahn@whitecase.com, emiller@whitecase.com, faenlle-
rocha@whitecase.com, patrick.hunnius@dlapiper.com,
shameed@whitecase.com, joshua.e.gardner@usdoj.gov,
ryan.parker@usdoj.gov, scott.simpson@usdoj.gov
RE: Log Cabin Republicans v United States of America et al (2:04-cv-

08425) - Request for copies of attestations by the Clerk of the Court of
the two contradictory judgments in the case.
Dear Clerk Nafisi:
Your help is requested relative to the caption referenced above in:
a) Providing copies of the attestation records (NEFs - Notices of

Electronic Filing) of the two judgments in the case - i. 06-03-21 Dkt #024
- Order granting Motion to Dismiss (and respective Judgment entered in
the Court's Judgment Index), published in the name of Judge George

Schiavelli, and ii. 10-10-12 Dkt #252 - Judgment and Permanent
Injunction published in the name of "Transferee Judge" Virginia Phillips;
b) Providing certification that the PACER docket in the case was

constructed pursuant to the law of the United States and by authority of
the Clerk of the Court.
Your help in this matter may also assist in preventing the burden on the
US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, of running an Appeal from a void, not
voidable Judgment.
In case there are any fees required for obtaining the requested records,
please let me know, so that I may expediently forward payment.
Truly,
).~
Joseph Zemik, PhD
Human
Rights
Alert
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of
Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United
States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on
the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous
deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
Visitor locations
http://www.scribd.com/Human Rights Alert

http://human-rights-alert.blogspOLcom/
http://,,,,-ww.Iiveleak. com/user/jz 12345
for an Order to Show Cause in re: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al on parties in
this action by a) emailing, and b) by mailing a true copy thereof, which was enclosed in a
sealed envelope, with postage fully prepaid, addressed as follows:

(202) 514-3388
(202) 514-3309
(202) 514-3180

(213) 620-7772
(213) 620-7785
(213) 620-7751
White & Case LLP

Terry Nafisi, Clerk (terry nafisi@cacd.uscourts.gov)
(213) 894-4727
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
correct.
Executed on December 2ib, 2010,
Joseph Zernik
By: _
JOSEPH ZERNIK
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
Case: 10-56634 01/06/2011 Page: 1 of 7 ID: 7604322 J1ktFntry: 43 _
W'E""" e E l V E 0
U.S. COURT Or- APPEALS
JAN 06 i"-.I".t'f!
i ~~: ~ i
FILED _
Case Nos 10-56634 and 10-56813 DOCKETED_=:::--_ _ -:::~~
DATE INITIAL


vs

Defendants-Appellants/Cross Appellees,

No CV 04-8425, Honorable Virginia A Phillips, Judge i
i·
-
DECLARATORY MANDATE: THE NEFs ARE PUBLIC RECORDS
Joseph Zernik, PhD

Digitally signed
2231 South Court DN: cn=Joseph
Zernik, 0, ou,
c=US
f 6'"m,,,,,,,"o'
Faximile (213) 261-9881 ~ Date: 2010.12.27
I
I
I
I
i
I
!.
5: MOTION FOR A DECLARATORY MANDATE: THE NEFs (NOTICES OF
ELECTRONIC FILING) ARE COURT RECORDS SUBJECT TO THE FIRST
AMENDMENT RIGHT OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO INSPECT AND TO COPY.
TO THE COURT AND TO PARTIES: Intervenor Dr Joseph Zemik ("Zernik") herein
files his Motion for a Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing) are
court records subject to the First Amendment right of public access to inspect and to
copy; like the Certificates of Service by the Clerk, which preceded them, the NEFs must
be incorporated in the PACER (the Court's online public access system) dockets by the
Clerk of the Court.
motion.
The papers, which are concomitantly filed under separate covers, are integral parts of
instant motion:
I: Request for Leave to File, Notice to Reliably Inform the Court, and Motion to
Intervene;
4: Motion for an Order to Show Cause on USA and Log Cabin Republicans in re:
the uncertified October 12, 2010 Judgment in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al:
It·
Why instant Appeals should not be dismissed for lack ofjurisdiction and/or t
mootness;
2/9 I.
1··
5: MOTION FOR A DECLARATORY MANDATE: THE NEFs ARE PUBLIC RECORDS
7: Motion for Declaratory Mandate in re: Establishment of CM/ECF at the US
District Court through the General Order 08-02 amounts to Deprivation of
Rights;
9: Request for permission to obtain CWECF password.
2. Prior to Implementation of PACER and CMlECF, Certificates of Service by the
Clerk were employed by the Court as Certificates of authentication/attestation
by the Clerk of the Court.
Prior to implementation of PACER and CWECF (the Court's case management and
electronic filing system), the US District Courts employed Certificates of Service by the
Clerk as authentication records.
General Order 08-02, II. Electronic Filing, (0) Certification of Electronic Documents,
of the District Court, Central District of California, in pertinent parts states:
o. Certification of Electronic Documents. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure 44(a)( I) and 44(c), the method of electronic certification described herein
is deemed proof of an official court record maintained by the Clerk of Court.
The NEF contains the date of electronic distribution and identification of the United
States District Court for the Central District of California as the sender. An encrypted
verification code appears in the electronic document stamp section of the NEF. The
electronic document stamp shall be used for the purpose of confirming the
authenticity of the transmission and associated document(s) with the Clerk of Court,
as necessary. When a document has been electronically filed into CMlECF, the
official record is the electronic recording of the document kept in the custody of the
Clerk of Court. The NEF provides certification that the associated document(s) is a
3/9
Case: 10-56634 01/06/2011 Page: 4 of 7 10: 7604322 OktEntry: 43 J
I
true and correct copy of the original filed with the court.
Accordingly, with implementation of PACER and CMlECF, the NEFs replaced the
paper-based Certificates of Service by the Clerk.
3. Prior to Implementation of PACER and CMlECF, the Certificates of Service by
the Clerk were incorporated into the dockets, and the public was permitted
access to such records to inspect and to copy, pursuant to First Amendment
rights.
Prior to Implementation of PACER and CMJECF, the Certificates of Service by the
Clerk were incorporated into the dockets.
In Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978) the Supreme Court of the United
States re-affirmed the common law right of the public to access court records to inspect
and to copy, as inherent to various Amendments to the Constitution of the United States,
including, but not limited to, the First Amendment.
Accordingly, the Certificates of Service by the Clerk were public records.
4. With implementation of CMlECF the NEFs were universally excluded from
public access, while no Rules of Courts were published to that effect, in alleged
violation of the Rulemaking Enabling Act, Due Process and First Amendment
rights.
As part of the implementation of CMlECF, the US District Court universally
excluded the NEFs from the PACER dockets. Instead, the NEFs are today included only
in CM/ECF. With it, public access to the NEFs is today denied.
Such material change in court procedures and such restrictions on public access to
court records were implemented, while no Rules of Court were published to that effect, in
4/9
For the reasons listed in paragraphs 1-6, above, the US Court of Appeals should enter
the declaratory mandate: The NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing) are court records
subject to the First Amendment right of the public access to inspect and to copy. Like the
Certificates of Service by the Clerk, which preceded them, the US District Court shall
immediately incorporate the NEFs in the publicly accessible PACER dockets.
By:
).~ _
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
2231 South Court ;-
i .
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209 i'
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
I, the undersigned, Joseph Zemik, read instant Intervenor's 5: Verified Motion for a
Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs are Public Records, and I know the content thereof
to be true and correct, it is true and correct based on my own personal knowledge, except
as to those matters therein stated as based upon information and belief, and as to those
matters, I believe them to be true and correct as well.
I make this declaration that the foregoing is true and correct under penalty of petjury
).~)/;h-
Executed on December 27th , 2010.
Joseph Zemik
7/9
I, the undersigned Joseph Zernik, served the documents described as: 5: Motion for a
Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs are Public Records on parties in this action by a)
emailing, and b) by mailing a true copy thereof, which was enclosed in a sealed envelope,
with postage fully prepaid, addressed as follows:

Anthony 1. Steinmeyer (anthony.steinmeyer@usdoj.gov)
(202) 514-3388
(202) 514-3309
(202) 514-3180

(213) 620-7772
(213) 620-7785
(213) 620-7751
White & Case LLP

(213) 894-4727
correct.
Executed this date, December 27th , 2010,
8/9
Joseph Zernik
BY:_)'~ {/--z;--
~
JOSEPH ZERNIK
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
9/9
R E C E
MOLLY C. OWYkR V E 0
Case Nos 10-56634 and 10-56813 u.s. COURTOFAP~~~~K
JAN 0 5 ~~fl11(;.~'; i f
IN THE UNIED STATES COURT OF APPE~~ET~D _

FOR THE NINTH CIRCillT DATE INITIAL

vs


- No CV 04-8425, Honorable Virginia A Phillips, Judge

DECLARATORY MANDATE - THE NEF, AS DRAFTED, IS AN INVALID
CERTIFICATION RECORD
Joseph Zernik, PhD

Digitally signed
Human Rights Alert (NGO) by Joseph
InProSe Zernik
DN: cn=Joseph
2231 South Court ~ . 17 Zernik, 0, OU,
Palo Alto, CA 94301 ) . ~L. email=jz12345@
earthlink.net,
Faximile (213) 261-9881 Date: 2010.12.27
jz12345@earthlink.net 15:03:42 +02'00'
i' .
,
i
'.
6: MOTION FOR A DECLARATORY MANDATE: THE NEF, AS DRAFTED, IS
AN INVALID ELECTRONIC CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION!
ATTESTATION BY THE CLERK; THE US DISTRICT COURT SHALL
IMMEDIATELY DRAFT A VALID ELECTRONIC CERTIFICATE OF
AUTHENTICATION! ATTESTATION BY THE CLERK.
TO THE COURT AND TO PARTIES: Intervenor Dr Joseph Zemik ("Zemik") herein
requests that the Court enter a Declaratory Mandate: The NEF (Notice of Electronic
Filing), as drafted, is an invalid certification record; The US District Court shall
inunediately redraft a valid electronic certificate of authentication! attestation by the
Clerk of the Court.
1. The concomitantly filed papers should be deemed integral parts of instant
motion.
The concomitantly filed papers are integral parts of instant filing:
Intervene;
Zemik v Connor et al was, is, and always will be void, not voidable.
the uncertified October 12, 2010 Judgment in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al
- Why instant Appeals should not be dismissed for lack ofjurisdiction and/or
mootness;
2!9
6: MOTION FOR MANDATE - THE NEFs ARE INVALID CERTIFICATION RECORDS
6: Motion for Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs, as drafted, are invalid as electronic
certificates of authentication/attestation by the Clerk, the US District Court shall
immediately draft valid electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the
Clerk;
through the General Order 08-02 of the US District Court amounts to
Deprivation ofRights;
2. Prior to Implementation of PACER and CMlECF, Certificates of Service by
Clerk served as the Certificates of Authentication! Attestation by the Clerk.
Prior to implementation of PACER and CMlECF, the US District Courts employed
Certificates of Service by Clerk as authentication records.
The General Order 08-02, of the District Court, in section II. Electronic Filing, (0)
Certification of Electronic Documents, replaced the Certificates of Service with the NEFs.
(See also - 5: Motion for Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs are Public Records).
3. Prior to Implementation of PACER and CMlECF, the Certificate of Service by
the Clerk used valid language for the Certification of Authentication!Attestation
by the Clerk of the Court.
The paper-based Certificate of Service by the Clerk of the Court, used the following
language:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3/9
<namel>, Case Number: <number>

Plaintiff,
v.
<name 2>, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Defendant.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the

Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California.
That on <date>, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) ofthe attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s)
hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing
said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's
office.
<service list>
Dated: <date>
<name of clerk>, Clerk
<wet graphic signature>
By: <name of deputy>, Deputy Clerk
4. The NEF, which was implemented as part of CMlECF uses different language.
The NEF, as implemented in CMlECF, uses the following language:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

The following transactionwas entered on <date> at <time> AM PDT and filed on <date>.
Case name: <caption>
Case number: <number>
Filer: <name>
Document Number: <docket number>
Docket Text:
<Text as it appears in the docket>
Notice has been electronically mailedto:
<names and electronic mail addresses>
Notice has been delivered by First Class U. S. Mail or by fax to:
<names and mailing addresses>
4/9
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:

Document description: <e.g.: "Main Documenf'>
Original fIlename: <e.g.: "M:\CY Case Opg\LA09CY01914CW-2254-1.pdF>
[STAMP cacdStamp ID=1020290914 [Date=3/24/2009] [FileNumber=7490322-0]
[hal e4c9adce56e6928dOeefa53c4bOc81 0443abc5deee0572f9a7b6bbda4fa2e964b
b0508t249c09cc40tbdID936e6483e4a54078340270 13ddd6569207b4d9a]]
5. The language of the NEF, as drafted, fails to include the essential elements of
certification of authentication/attestation by the Clerk of the Court.
The language of the paper-based Certificate of Service is compared to the language of
the NEF regarding the following elements: a) Title, b) Certification statements, and c) 1· .
Signatures/authorities.
a) In the Certificate of Service the title included the word "Certificate". The title of the
NEF fails to include such wording.
b) The Certificate of Service included the key statement '1, the undersigned, hereby
certify... ' The NEF fails to include such statement.
c) The Certificate of Service included a 'wet' graphic signature in a legal signature
box, including the typed name of the Clerk of the Court above the graphic
signature, the name of an individual, and hislher authority below the signature line.
The NEF fails to include the full name or authority of the individuals, who
issues the NEF.
No personal signature, either graphic or digital, is affixed in the NEF by an
individual, as a symbol of intent to take responsibility.
5/9
The 'electronic document stamp', which appears in the NEF is an encrypted,
machine generated 'checksum' string. As such, it should be deemed inherently
invalid as a symbol affixed by an individual with the intent to take responsibility.
Therefore, the NEF should be deemed vague and ambiguous and/or void as a
certificate of authentication/authentication by the Clerk of the Court.
6. The NEFs undermined the accountability of the Clerk of the US Court for
integrity of electronic court dockets and electronic court records.
The Clerk of the US Court refuses to certify the PACER dockets in general, and the
PACER dockets of Log Cabins Republicans v USA et ai, in Fine v Sheriff, and in Zernik v
Connor et ai, in particular.
7. In two cases of the US District Court, Central District of California, which were
incorporated by reference, unauthorized personnel issued the NEFs.
Under the circumstances, created through the implementation of the NEF, as drafted,
individuals, who were not authorized as Deputy Clerks, 'entered' records in the PACER
dockets and issued the NEFs in Fine v Sheriff and Zernik v Connor et al.
It is likely that upon discovery it would be found that unauthorized individuals also
'entered' records in the PACER docket and issued the NEFs in Log Cabin Republicans v
USA etal.
8. As a result of implementing the NEF as the electronic certificate of
authentication/authentication, it is claimed the PACER court dockets should be
deemed vague and ambiguous, therefore, denying Federal Due Process rights.
The facts, described in paragraphs 1-7, above, relative to implementation of the NEF
as the electronic certificate of authentication/attestation, are claimed to have left the
6/9
..
PACER dockets of the US District Court vague and ambiguous in general, and in Fine v
Sheriff, in Zernik v Connor et ai, and in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et ai, in
particular.
Maintenance of vague and ambiguous court dockets should be deemed by the Court
violation of Federal Due Process rights.
9. Therefore, the US Court of Appeals is respectfully requested to enter a
declaratory mandate: The NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing), as drafted, is an
invalid electronic certificate of authentication/attestation by the Clerk of the
Court; the Us District Court shall immediately draft a valid electronic
certification record.
For the reasons listed in paragraphs 1-8, above, Court should enter a declaratory
mandate: The NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing), as drafted, is an invalid electronic
certificate of authentication/attestation by the Clerk of the Court; the US District Court
shall immediately redraft a valid electronic certificate of authentication/ attestation by the
Clerk of the Court.
).~
By: _
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
7/9
I, the undersigned, Joseph Zernik, read instant Intervenor's 6: Verified Motion for a
Declaratory Mandate: The NEF is Invalid as a Certification Record, and I know the
content thereof to be true and correct, it is true and correct based on my own personal
knowledge, except as to those matters therein stated as based upon information and
belief, and as to those matters, I believe them to be true and correct as welL
Executed on December 27 th, 2010.
Joseph Zernik
I, the undersigned Joseph Zernik, served the documents described as: 6: Motion for a
Declaratory Mandate: The NEF is Invalid as a Certification Record on parties in this
action by a) emailing, and b) by mailing a true copy thereof, which was enclosed in a
sealed envelope, with postage fully prepaid, addressed as follows:

(202) 514-3388
(202) 514-3309
(202) 514-3180

(213) 620-7772
(213) 620-7785
8/9

(213) 620-7751
White & Case LLP

(213) 894-4727
correct.
Executed this date, December 27th, 2010,
Joseph Zernik
BY:)'~
JOSEPH ZERNIK
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
jz 12345@eartWink.net
9/9
Case Nos 10-56634 and 10-56813
\O~:fuk~~:P?E~~RK
IN THE UNIED STATES COURT OF APPEALS - LS
0
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 0 6 2U11

FILED
DOCKET-E-D----- - - -
Log Cabin Republicans, DATE INITIAl
vs


- No CV 04-8425, Honorable Virginia A Phillips, Judge
!
\'"
7: INTERVENOR DR JOSEPH ZERNIK'S VERIFIED MOTION FOR A
DECLARATORY MANDATE: THE ESTABLISHEMNT OF PACER AND
CMlECF THROUGH THE GENERAL ORDER 08-02 OF THE US
DISTRICT COURT AMOUNTS TO DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER
THE COLOR OF LAW.
Joseph Zemik, PhD

Digitally signed
Human Rights Alert (NGO) by Joseph Zernik
InProSe DN: cn=Joseph
Zernik, 0, OU,
2231 South Court ) •~ email=jz12345@
Palo Alto, CA 94301 earthlink.net,
c=US
Telephone: (323) 521-6209 Date: 2010.12.27
Facsimile (213) 261-9881 15:06:26 +02'00'
7: VERIFIED MOTION FOR A DECLARATORY MANDATE: THE
ESTABLISHEMNT OF PACER AND CMlECF THROUGH THE GENERAL
ORDER 08-02 OF THE US DISTRICT COURT AMOUNTS TO DEPRIVATION
OF RIGHTS UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW.
files his Motion for a Declaratory Mandate: The establishment of PACER and CM/ECF i
!.
through the General Order 08-02 of the US District Court amounts to Deprivation of
Rights under the Color ofLaw.
motion.
The following papers were concomitantly filed under separate covers:
Intervene;
; ..
3: Motion for Declaratory Mandate: The April 24, 2009 Judgment in Zernik v
Connor et al was, is, and always will be void, not voidable.
the October 12, 2010 uncertified Judgment in Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al:
1-
Why instant Appeals should not be dismissed for lack ofjurisdiction and/or
mootness;

I
i
2/10 ~.
7: DENIAL OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO CMlECF AMOUNTS TO DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS
6: Motion for Declaratory Mandate: The NEF, as drafted, is invalid as an electronic
certificates of authentication/attestation by the Clerk, the US District Court shall
immediately draft valid electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the

:.
Clerk;
through the General Order 08-02 of the US District Court amounts to Deprivation
o/Rights;
9: Request for pennission to obtain CMlECF password.
2. In General Order 08-02, the US District Court established procedures related to
electronic filing and case management
General Order 08-02 established the procedures for electronic filing and electronic
case management and public access to electronic court records in the US District Court,
Central District ofCalifomia. Two systems were established: a) The Court's online
public access system (PACER), and b) The Court's case management/electronic filing
system (CMlECF).
Inherent in the General Order 08-02 are various procedures, which materially affect
the rules pertaining to conduct of litigation in the Court, pertaining to authority and
accountability of the Clerk for papers entered in the PACER dockets, pertaining to
counsel and pro se appearance, and pertaining to public access to court records.
Therefore, the General Order 08-02 had material impact on matters pertaining to
Access to the Courts, Federal Due Process, and/or First Amendment Rights.
3/10
3. The General Order 08-02 was published by the US District Court with no name
of a duly authorized US Judge as its author, with no signature by a duly
authorized US judge of the US District Court, and with no certification by the
Clerk of the Court.
In contrast with other General Orders of the US District Court, the General Order 08-
02 was published with no name of a duly authorized US Judge as its author, with no
signature by a dilly authorized US judge of the US District Court.
Regardless, the US District Court enforced the General Order as a valid order of the
Court.
The publication and enforcement of the unsigned, uncertified General Order 08-02,
as described above, is alleged as violation of Due Process rights.
4. The Clerk of the US District Court denies access the General Order 08-02 to copy
the record with valid name of its author, signature by a judge of the US District
Court, and certification by the Clerk of the Court, in alleged violation of First
Amendment rights.
Requests were repeatedly filed with the Clerk of the US District Court, to obtain a
valid copy of the General Order 08-02, including a name of its author, signature by a
duly US judge of the District Court, and certification by the Clerk of the Court. The
requests have been denied.
The denial of access to the General Order 08-02, as certified by a judge of the Court
is alleged as violation of First Amendment rights.
5. Upon information and belief, Zernik claims that in fact, no valid and effectual
copy of the General Order 08-02 exists.
4/10
7: DENIAL OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO CM/ECF AMOUNTS TO DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS
Upon information and belief, gained through the efforts to gain access, Zernik claims
that in fact, no valid and effectual copy of the General Order 08-02 exists.
6. In General Order 08-02 the US District Court effectively established new Rules of
Court, in alleged violation of the Rulemaking Enabling Act.
US law prescribes the manner in which the US courts are to adopt rules of court,
pursuant to Rule Making Enabling Act 28 USC §§2071-7.
In General Order 08-02, the US District Court effectively established material new
rules of court in alleged violation of the requirements prescribed in the Rule Making
Enabling Act 28 USC §§2071-7.
7. In General Order 08-02 the US District Court effectively established Rules of
Court, which exclude the electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by
the Clerk from public access in alleged violation of First Amendment and Due
Process rights.
Although never explicitly stated in the General Order 08-02, the rules, which were
effectively established, deny public access to the electronic certificates of
authentication/attestation by the Clerk of the Court (NEFs - Notices of Electronic Filing).
(see also: 5: Motion for Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs are Public Records).
Therefore, it is alleged that the implementation of PACER and CMlECF through the
General Order 08-02 effectively denies the public First Amendment rights.
Moreover, absent access to the NEFs, the public is unable to distinguish between
I
i
valid court orders and judgments and such that are void, not voidable.
l
I·
Therefore, it is alleged that the implementation of PACER and CMlECF through the I'.' .
!;
i
I
General Order 08-02 effectively denies the public Due Process rights. I
r·
5/10
7: DENIAL OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO CMlECF AMOUNTS TO DEPRIVAnON OF RIGHTS
I.
8. In General Order 08-02 the US District Court effectively established in CMJECF
new Rules of Court pertaining to employment of the NEF, as drafted, as the
electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the Clerk. The NEF, as
drafted, is claimed to be an invalid certificate, and as such, violation of Due
Process rights.
In implementing PACER and CM/ECF through the General Order 08-02, the Court
established the use of the NEF as the new certificate of authentication/attestation by the
Clerk.
Although never explicitly stated in the General Order 08-02, the General Order 08-
02 effectively established the NEF, as drafted, using invalid certification language.
(see also - 6:Motion for Declaratory Mandate: The NEFs, as drafted, are invalid as
electronic certificates of authentication/attestation by the Clerk)
Therefore, it is alleged that implementation of the NEF, as drafted, denies the public
Due Process rights.
9. In General Order 08-02 the US District Court explicitly established new Rules of
Court, denying pro se filers and the public at large access to CMJECF, in alleged
violation of rights inherent to the First Amendment, Due Process, and Access to
the Courts.
General Order 08-02, II. Electronic Filing, (0) Certification of Electronic Documents,
of the District Court, Central District of California, in pertinent parts, states:
B. Pro Se Litigants.
Documents filed by pro se litigants will continue to be filed and served in the traditional manner and
will be scanned by the Clerk's Office into the CM/ECF system.
Therefore, it is alleged that through the General Order 08-02, the US District Court
effectively established new Rules of Court, which effectively deny pro se filers and the
6/10
public at large rights inherent to the First Amendment, Due Process, and Access to the
Courts.
10. The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, permits pro se fIlers access to CMlECF.
The evidence shows that the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, never adopted such
discriminatory rules, which generally denies pro se filers' access to CMlECF.
11. In the General Order 08-02 the US District Court effectively undermined the
authority of the Clerk and the accountability of the Clerk for appearances by
Counsel and papers entered by Counsel in the online PACER dockets.
Through the General Order 08-02, the US District Court effectively established Rules
of Courts, which permit counsel to appear and enter papers in the PACER dockets with
no prior review by the Clerk of the Court.
12. Enabling counsel to appear and enter papers in the PACER dockets with no
prior review by the Clerk of the Court is alleged as violation of Equal Protection
and Due Process rights.

..
Conditions, where counsel are able to appear and 'enter' papers in the PACER
dockets with no prior review by the Clerk of the Court enable appearances by Counsel,
who are not counsel of record.
The phenomenon was documented under similar circumstances in a different US
Court, in the March 5,2008 Memorandum Opinion (Dkt #248) of the Honorable Jeff
Bohm, US Bankruptcy Judge, US Bankruptcy Court, Texas, in the Case ofBorrower
Parsley (05-90374). [1] Counsel appeared in the case on behalf of Countrywide
1 For those with no access to PACER, a copy of the Memorandum Opinion was posted online:
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/25001966/
7/10
7: DENIAL OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO CMJECF AMOUNTS TO DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS
Financial Corporation, while not counsel of record, and with 'no communications with
client' clause.
The same conduct took place under Zernik v Connor et al in the US District Court,
Central District of California: The office of the General Counsel of Bank of America
Corporation repeatedly informed Plaintiff Zernik that Bryan Cave, LLP was not
authorized to appear on behalf of Bank of America. Regardless, Bryan Cave, LLP
continued to appear on behalf of Bank of America.
The same conduct took place in Fine v Sherif/in the US District Court, Central
Distgct of California: The Judicial Council of California provided credible evidence that
Attorney Kevin McCormick was not authorized to appear in the case on behalf of the
Superior Court. Regardless, Attorney McCormick appeared and filed papers on behalf of
the Superior Court. (Exhibit 7:1)
The same conduct is claimed to have taken place under Zernik v Connor et al at the
US District Court, Central District of California. Following discovery of the false
appearances of Attorney McCormick on behalf of the Superior Court of California, the
California Judicial Council refused to respond on requests to confirm the authority, or
lack thereof, of Attorneys from Cummings McClorey Davis Acho and Associates, who
appeared in the caption on behalf of the Superior Court of California.
Appearances by unauthorized counsel are alleged as violation of Equal Protection and
Due Process rights.
13. Under CMlECF as established by the US District Court, unauthorized Court
personnel 'entered' minutes, orders, and judgments with invalid NEFs.
8/10
7: DENIAL OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO CMlECF AMOUNTS TO DEPRlVATION OF RIGHTS
In both Zernik v Connor et al and Fine v Sheriffpersons at the US District Court, who
were not authorized as Deputy Clerks 'entered' in the PACER dockets minutes, orders,
and judgments with invalid NEFs, with no 'electronic document stamps'.
(see also 3: Motion for Declaratory Judgment in re: Zernik v Connor et al.)
It is claimed that upon investigation and discovery it would be established that
unauthorized individuals also 'entered' judicial records in the PACER docket of Log
Cabin Republicans v USA et al.
The entry of records in the PACER docket by unauthorized individuals is alleged as
violation of Due Process rights.
14. Under conditions established by the US District Court in PACER and CMlECF,
the Clerk of the Court refuses to certify the PACER dockets in Log Cabin
Republicans v USA et al and in Zernik v Connor et ale
Conditions were established by the US District Court, so that today the Clerk of the
Court refuses to certify the PACER dockets in the two cases that are underlie instant
Intervention: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al and Zernik v Connor et al.
The publication of PACER dockets, which the Clerk refuses to certify is alleged as
violation of Due Process rights.
15. Under the General Order 08-02, it is alleged that the US District Court effectively
established separate and unequal Access to the Courts and the First Amendment
right to access court records.
Through the General Order 08-02, the US District Court effectively established two
classes relative to Access to the Courts and the First Amendment right to access court
records.
9/10
7: DENIAL OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO CMJECF AMOUNTS TO DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS
Those who hold CMlECF password are permitted to 'enter' records in the PACER
dockets with no prior review by the Clerk, while those with no CMlECF password are
denied such right.
Those who hold CMlECF password are permitted access to certain court records,
while those with no CMlECF password are denied access to such court records.
Therefore, it is alleged that through the General Order 08-02, the US District Court
established separate and unequal el Access to the Courts and the First Amendment right
to access court records to inspect and to copy.
16. Therefore, the US Court of Appeals is respectfully requested to enter the
Declaratory Mandate: Establishment of CMlECF in the US District Court
through the General Order 08-02, amounts to Deprivation ofRights under the
Color ofLaw.
For the reasons listed in paragraphs 1-15, above, the Court should enter the
Declaratory Mandate: The establishment of PACER and CMlECF through the General
Order 08-02 amounts to Deprivation ofRight under the Color ofLaw.
By:
).~~. _
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
2In Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), the US Supreme Court rejected the doctrine of
Separate but Equal. Separate but Unequal should surely be rejected by the Court.
10/10
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 7:1 - Correspondence with the California Judicial Council in re: Appearance
by Attorney Kevin McConmck on behalf of the Superior Court under Fine
v Sher~(2:09-cv-01914)
I, the undersigned, Joseph Zernik, read instant Intervenor's 7: Verified Motion for a
Declaratory Mandate: Establishment of PACER and CMlECF through the General
Order 08-02 amounts to Deprivation of Rights, and I know the content thereof to be
true and correct, it is true and correct based on my own personal knowledge, except as to
those matters therein stated as based upon infonnation and belief, and as to those matters,
I believe them to be true and correct as well.
Executed on December 27
ili
• 2010. ) .~ n
Joseph Zernik
11/10
7: DENIAL OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO CM/ECF AMOUNTS TO DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS
EXBIBITS
EXHIBIT 7:1
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 201014:35:04 -0700

To: "Carrizosa, Philip" <Philip.Carrizosa@jud.ca.gov>
Subject: RE: Request for information - Fine case
PHILIP R. CARRIZOSA
Office of Communications
Judicial Council of Califomia - Administrative Office of the Courts
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th floor
San Francisco CA 94102-3688
Direct 415/865-8044, Fax 415-865-4588
philip.carrizosa@jud.ca.gov
www.courtinfo.ca.gov
The favor of a response within 2 business days was requested.
Dear Mr Carrizosa:
Thank you again for your expedient attention and care of my requests. Let me again clarify my requests:
a) Mr Carrizosa's March 16, 20102:50 PM email stated the case caption as:
Fine v. Sheriff ofLos Angeles Court.
b) Dr Zemik's March 16,201011:41 PM email requested that the case caption be stated as:
'Yhe full caption of the case of the habeas corpus ofAttorney Fine correctly stated, as it
appeared in the US District Court PACER docket"
c) Mr Carrizosa's March 19, 2010 2:50 PM email stated the case caption as
Fine v. Sheriff.
d) Dr Zemik's March 19, 2010 12:58 PM email repeated the March 16, 2010 request that the case
caption be stated as:
'Yhe full caption of the case of the habeas corpus of Attorney Fine correctly stated, as it
Again, I apologize for any burden that I created on your office. Herein, I respectfully repeat my request, that
your good offices issue a response that could not possibly be viewed by any reasonable person as vague
and/or ambiguous, therefore, stating the case caption as:
'Yhe full caption of the case of the habeas corpus ofAttorney Fine correctly stated, as it
The matter at hand pertains to a person's Liberty. Regardless, if through my own lack of care, I unintentionally
created in my requests for correct listing of the caption of the case at hand a burden, which could not be
accommodated by your office, please let me know, so that I do not bother you by repeating the same request
again.
Truly,
),~
• Page2l6 March 19,2010
Joseph Zemik, PhD

ht!p:/linproperinla.blogsoot.com/
http:/twww.scribd.com/Free the Rampart FIPs
http://VMW.liveleak.com/userftz12345
http:/twww.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://VMW.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Patriotic pies of Beyonce' Know/es, Sharon Slone, and Char/lze Theron,
Coming soon- deep house music!
At 01 :23 PM 3/19/2010, Mr Carrizosa wrote:

Mr.Zemik,
Perhaps I do not understand your request. I resent the message using the case title
and number as you stated it in your original e-mail. What is it about the resent
message that is incorrect?
Philip R. Carrizosa
Direct 415/865-8044, Fax 415-865-4588
After 4 p.m. and weekends: 415/407-4615
"Serving the courts for the benefit of all Califomians"
At 12:58 PM 3/19/2010, Dr Zemik wrote:
From: joseph zemik [mailto:jz12345@earthlink.netJ

Sent: Friday, March 19,201012:58 PM
To: Carrizosa, Philip
Dear Mr Carrizosa:
Thank you for your timely response. Given that ambiguity was created in the original
response by your office, relative to the identity of the case at hand, the March 16,
2010 letter, copied below, explicitly requested that "you ... resend the message
below, with the full caption of the case of the habeas corpus ofAttomey Fine correctly
stated, as it appeared in the US District Court PACER docket."
The favor of a corrected response from your good offices, including "the full caption of
the case of the habeas corpus of Attomey Fine correctly stated, as it appeared in the
US District Court PACER docker' is again requested.
Please bear with my additional request for correction - instant request is merely an
exact repeat of my March 16,2010 request letter, I hope that you would be able to
abide with me in this clerical issue.
Truly,
Joseph Zemik, PhD

http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ I·
!' .
http://www.scribd.com/Free the Rampart FIPs
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
• Page 3/6 March 19, 2010
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine l'

Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron,
At 11:24AM 3/19/2010, MrCarrizosawrote:
Mr.Zemik,
In response to your March 16 request to resend our response with the case title and
number that you used, I offer our response:
The Administrative Office of the Courts retained the Benton, Orr, Duval & Buckingham
law firm to represent the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles and
Judge David Yaffe in Fine v. Sheriff, 2:09-cv-1914, pursuant to Government Code
section 811.9 and rule 10.202 of the California Rules of Court, which require the AOC
to manage litigation affecting the courts, including the responsibility to select legal
counsel on behalf of courts and judicial officers. Kevin McCormick is a partner in the
retained law firm.
We cannot respond to your other hypotheticals.
I hope this answers your inquiry.

i ..
~
Philip R. Carrizosa
Judicial Council of California - Administrative Office of the Courts
Direct 415/865-8044, Fax 415-865-4588
"Serving the courts for the benefit of all Californians"
:..
At 11:41 PM 3/16/2010, Dr Zemik wrote:
From: joseph zernik [mailto:jz12345@earthlink.netl

Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11 :41 PM
Subject: Re: Request for information - Fine case
Dear Mr Carrizosa:
Thank you again for your prompt response. Upon re-reading of your response below,
I realized that you had an typographical error in stating the caption of the case that
was the subject of my request for information. Therefore, for the record, in order to
have a valid response from your office on the matter at hand, I would be grateful if you
could resend the message below, with the full caption of the case of the habeas
corpus of Attorney Fine correctly stated, as it appeared in the US District Court
PACER docket.
[.... ".
Truly, I
j
.
,.
,
Joseph Zemik, PhD
http://www.scribd.com/Free the Rampart FIPs
http://www.liveleak.comfuser/jz12345
• Page4/6 March 19,2010
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron,
At 02:50 PM 3/16/2010, Mr Carrizosa wrote:
Mr.Zemik,
In response to your March 13 request for clarifying information and confirmation of

your five hypothetical assertions, I offer our response:
The Administrative Office of the Courts retained the Benton, Orr, Duval & Buckingham
law firm to represent the Superior Court of Califomia, County of Los Angeles and
Judge David Yaffe in Fine v. Sheriff of Los Angeles Court, Case No. CV 09-1914,
pursuant to Government Code section 811.9 and rule 10.202 of the Califomia Rules
of Court, which require the AOC to manage litigation affecting the courts, including the
responsibility to select legal counsel on behalf of courts and judicial officers. Kevin
McCormick is a partner in the retained law firm.
I hope this answers your inquiry.
Philip R. Carrizosa
JUdicial Council of Califomia - Administrative Office of the Courts
Direct 415/865-8044, Fax 415-865-4588
At 3:23 PM 3/13/2010, Dr Zernik wrote:
From: joseph zemik [mailto:jz12345@earthlink.netl
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 3:23 PM
Cc: McCormick, Brenda; McCormick, Kevin M; Attention: Judge David Yaffe and the
LA Superior Court C/O John Clarke, Clerk
Subject: Richard Fine: Califomia Chief Justice Ronald George and Alleged Fraud in
Appearances of Attomey Kevin McCormick in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-Q1914) - the i
I·
habeas corpus petition at the US District Court, LA
March 13,2010
Philip R. Carrizosa
Direct 415/865-8044, Fax 415-865-4588
RE: Richard Fine: California Chief Justice Ronald George and Alleged Fraud in
Appearances of Attorney Kevin McCormick in Fine v Sheriff (2:09.cv.01914) -
• Page5/6 March 19. 2010
the habeas corpus petition at the US District Court, LA
Dear Mr Carrizosa:
Thank you again for your past help in clarifying information pertaining to the California
Administrative Office of the Courts. I again request your help.
In recently published online notes in several forums, I alleged dishonest and/or

fraudulent conduct by Attorney Kevin M McCormick of the law-firm of Benton, Orr,
Duval & Buckingham, relative to his appearances in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) -
the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine at the US District Court. Los Angeles. I
further alleged that his conduct was key to affecting the ongoing false hospitalization
of Attorney RICHARD FINE - a political dissident. [1], [2], [3]
Following the online postings at the ABA Journal, I received unauthenticated,

unverified communications, which lead to the formulation of the following five (5)
hypothetical assertions:
1) Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK's wife, Attorney BRENDA MCCORMICK, was
Court Managing Attorney for the Superior Court of California, County of Ventura.
2) Appearances of Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON,
ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) were not pursuant
to his engagement by the Intervenors in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) - DAVID
YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES.
3) Appearances of KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR.
DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-ev-Q1914) were pursuant to his
engagement by the California Administrative Office of the Courts. an arm of the
judicial Council. chaired by California Chief Justice RONALD GEORGE, and/or
through related entities.
4) Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON, ORR, DUVAL &
BUCKINGHAM was never authorized as Counsel of Record by the Intervenors in
Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-Q1914) - DAVID YAFFE and the SUPERIOR COURT OF
CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.
5) Engagement of Attorney KEVIN M MCCORMICK of the law-firm of BENTON,
ORR, DUVAL & BUCKINGHAM by the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
and arm of the Judicial Council, chaired by California Chief Justice RONALD
GEORGE, and/or related entities. included a stipulation prohibiting Attorney KEVIN
MCCORMICK from communicating with the Intervening parties - DAVID YAFFE and
the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - regarding
Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK's appearances in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-Q1914).
Request is for confinnation on behalf of the California Administrative Office of
the Courts, and the Chainnan of the Judicial Council, California Chief Justice
Ronald George, the five (5) hypothetical assertions, listed above, regarding I.
engagement of Attorney Kevin McConnick to appear in Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-
01914)· the habeas corpus petition.
Truly,
Joseph Zernik, PhD

http://www.scribd.com/Free the Rarnpart FIPs
Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine
CC:
1. McCorrnick, Brenda - by email
2. McCormick, Kevin - by email
3.Yaffe, David and the LA Superior Court - by fax
• Page 6/6 March 19,2010
4. Others of Interest
LINKED:
[1] The American Bar Association's motto is: "Defending Uberty, Pursuing Justice"
[2] ABA Joumal article and comments: 70 Year Old Lawyer Hits One-year Mark In
Jail In Contempt
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/70-year-old lawyer hits one-
year mark in jail in contempt case/#Comments
[3] March 13,2010 ABA Journal article and comments: 70 Year Old Lawyer Hits One-
year Mark In Jail In Contempt, as copied:
http://inproperinla.com/1 0-03-13-aba-joumal-article-on-richard-fine-and-comments-
s.pdf
! .
!
"
March 22, 2010 response by the California Judicial Council.
X-MSK: CML=1.001000
From: "Camzosa, Philip"
To: joseph zernik
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 201014:58:26 -0700
Thread-Topic: Request for information - Fine case
Thread-Index: AcrHwfYJBnu5MkmiSiKkBZ5LohiLpgCSAP4w
Accep~Language:en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
acceptlanguage: en-US
X-ELNK-AV: 0
Mr. Zernik,
In light of your revised request, I am again sending our original response which we believe contains the correct and true
• Page2J2 March 23, 2010
caption for the case.
The Administrative Office of the Courts retained the Benton, Orr, Duval & Buckingham law firm to represent the Superior
Court of California, County of Los Angeles and Judge David Yaffe in Fine v. Sheriff of Los Angeles Court, Case No. CV
09-1914, pursuant to Govemment Code section 811.9 and rule 10.202 of the California Rules of Court, which require the
AOC to manage litigation affecting the courts, including the responsibility to select legal counsel on behalf of courts and
judicial officers. Kevin McCormick is a partner in the retained law firm.
Philip R. Carrizosa
Judicial Council of California - Administrative Office of the Courts
Direct 415/865-8044, Fax 415-865-4588
for a Declaratory Mandate: Establishment of PACER and CMlECF through the
General Order 08-02 amounts to Deprivation of Rights, on parties in this action by a)
emailing, and b) by mailing a true copy thereof, which was enclosed in a sealed envelope,
with postage fully prepaid, addressed as follows:

(202) 514-3388
(202) 514-3309
(202) 514-3180

(213) 620-7772
(213) 620-7785
(213) 620-7751
White & Case LLP

Terry Nafisi, Clerk (terry_nafisi@cacd.uscourts.gov) ; .
(213) 894-4727
correct.
Executed on December 27th , 2010,
I .
Joseph Zemik
By.
).~ _
JOSEPH ZERNIK
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
R E C E
Case Nos 10-56634 and 10-56813 MOLLYC I V E 0
u.s. coufl{o~E~p' CLERK
"'I PEALS
IN THE UNIED STATES COURT OF APPEAI$

FT[Eo _
JAN D6 2tiit
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOCKET=E::'"D_------ -_ _
DATE
INITIAL

.!
, '
vs


8: INTERVENOR DR JOSEPH ZERNIK'S REQUEST FOR

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
Joseph Zemik, PhD Digitally signed

InProSe by Joseph Zernik
DN: cn=Joseph
2231 South Court Zernik, 0, OU,
Palo Alto, CA 94301 ) .~ 'email=jz12345@
earthlink.net,
Facsimile (213) 261-9881 Date: 2010.12.27
15:08:51 +02'00'
I·
1·-
8: INTERVENOR DR JOSEPH ZERNIK'S VERIFIED REQUEST FOR
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
; :
files his request for incorporation by reference.
1. List of records, whose incorporation by reference is requested.
Zernik requests that the Court incorporate by reference the dockets and all papers in
the following three cases of the US District Court, Central District of California:
a) Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (2:04-cv-08425)
b) Joseph Zernik v Jacqueline Connor et al (2:08-cv-0 1550)
c) Richard Fine v SheriffofLos Angeles County et al (2:09-cv-01914)
Zernik requests that the Court incorporate by reference the docket of the following
case of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit:
d) Richard Fine v SheriffofLos Angeles County et al (09-56073)
Zernik requests that the Court incorporate by reference of the following record from
the US Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas.
e) March 5,2008 Memorandum Opinion (Dkt #248) in the Case ofBorrower
William Allen Parsley (05-90374) e]

Zernik requests that the Court incorporate by reference, of the following record of the
US District Court, Central District of California:
f) General Order 08-02 e]
1 For ease of reference by readers with no access to PACER, a copy was posted online:
Hhttp://www.scribd.comldoc/25001966/
2 For ease of reference, a copy was posted online: Hhttp://www.scribd.com/docl27632471/
2/5
8: REQUEST FOR INCORPORAnON BY REFERENCE
2. Request is for incorporation of both the PACER records and the CMlECF
records in the cases listed in 1. a), b), and c), above.
The NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing), which are today the electronic certificates of
authentication/attestation of the US District Court are excluded from the PACER (the
District Court's online public access system) dockets, but are accessible in CM/ECF.
The NEFs and other CMlECF records are explicitly part of instant Request.
3. The request for incorporation by reference of judicial and clerical records, listed
in 1 a), b), c), and t), above, should not be construed as implying their validity.
Relative to judicial and clerical records, listed in 1 a), b), c), and t), above, instant
request should not be construed as implying their validity. On the contrary, the
concomitantly filed papers claim their invalidity.
4. The above referenced cases provide critical evidence relative to instant filing.
The dockets and court records, listed in 1. a) through t), above, provide critical
evidence in support of claims raised in the Notice to Reliably Inform the Court, the
Motion to Intervene, and the concomitantly filed papers.
5. Therefore, the Court is respectfully requested to incorporate by reference the
records listed in 1 a) through t), above.
For the reasons listed in paragraphs 1-4, above, the incorporation by reference of
records listed in 1 a) through t), above, should be granted.
Dated: December 27 th , 2010 Joseph Zernik
By: _
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
3/5
8: REQUEST FOR INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
2231 South Court

Palo Alto, CA 94301
,.
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
jzl2345@earthlink.net
I, the undersigned, Joseph Zernik, read instant Intervenor's 8: Verified Request for
Incorporation by Reference, and I know the content thereof to be true and correct, it is
I make this declaration that the foregoing is true and correct under penalty of peIjury
Executed on this 27th day in December, 2010.
Joseph Zemik
I, the undersigned Joseph Zernik, served the documents described as: 8: Request for
Incorporation by Reference on parties in this action by a) emailing, and b) by mailing a
true copy thereof, which was enclosed in a sealed envelope, with postage fully prepaid,

(202) 514-3309
(202) 514-3388
(202) 514-3180
4/5

(213) 620-7751
(213) 620-7785
(213) 620-7772
White & Case LLP

(213) 894-4727
USDistrict Court, Central District of California
correct.
Executed this date, December 27th, 2010,
Joseph Zernik
).~L
By: _
JOSEPH ZERNIK
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
jz12345@eartWink.net
5/5
i
l.,.
Case: 10-56634 01/06/2011 Page: 1 of 4 ID: 7604345 OktEntry: 47
RECEIVED
MOLLY C. DWYER CLERK
Case Nos 10-56634 and 10-56813 u.s. COURT OF APPEALS
JAN 06 2011
IN THE UNIED STATES COURT OF A'NIE~M.~~---- _
DOCKETED_=.....--_
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DATE '""'IN=IT,.,. , 'A.....
L

vs


No CV04-8425, Honorable Virginia A Phillips, Judge
9: INTERVENOR JOSEPH ZERNIK'S VERIFIED REQUEST FOR

PERMISSION TO OBTAIN CMlECF PASSWORD.
Joseph Zemik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO) Digitally signed
ON: cn=Joseph
2231 South Court Zernik, 0, OU,
c=US
Facsimile (213) 261-9881 Date: 2010.12.27
jz12345@earthlink.net 15:10:48 +02'00'
.. "-,
9: VERIFIED REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO OBTAIN CMlECF PASSWORD
requests that the Court permit him to obtain a CMlECF password.
1. Zernik is readily familiar with CMlECF procedures.
Zemik has read and reviewed the CMlECF manuals and instruction video transcripts
of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, and comparable materials of various US District
Court and Courts of Appeals.
Zemik also published review of CMlECF in a peer-reviewed international computer
science journal. [1]
Zernik has also authored another report pertaining to CMlECF, currently pending
peer-review in an international law journal. (]
2. Absence access to CMlECF, Zernik is placed in serious disadvantage in the
litigation.
Conditions, where one party to litigation is denied access to CMlECF, while other
parties are permitted access, are claimed to put the party, which is denied access, in
serious disadvantage, alleged as denial of Due Process rights. (see also 7: Motion for a
Declaratory Mandate in re: General Order 08-02 CMlECF)
3. Therefore, the US Court of Appeals is respectfully requested to permit Zernik to
obtain a CMlECF password.
1 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts,
International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
2 Zernik, J Case Management and Online Public Access Systems of the Courts in the United
States - pending
2/4
9: REQUEST FOR CM/ECF PASSWORD
For the reasons listed in paragraphs 1-2, above, the US Court should grant Zernik's
request for pennission to obtain CMlECF password.
By:
).~ _
?19--
JOSEPH H ZERNIK
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
I, the undersigned, Joseph Zemik, read instant Intervenor's 9: Request for Permission to
Obtain CMlECF Password, and I know the content thereof to be true and correct, it is
Executed on December 27th , 2010. ).~
Joseph Zemik
I, the undersigned Joseph Zemik, served the documents described as: 9: Request for
Permission to Obtain CMlECF Password on parties in this action by a) emailing, and
b) by mailing a true copy thereof, which was enclosed in a sealed envelope, with postage
fully prepaid, addressed as follows:
3/4
9: REQUEST FOR CMlECF PASSWORD

(202) 514-3388
(202) 514-3309
(202) 514-3180

(213) 620-7772
(213) 620-7785
(213) 620-7751
White & Case LLP

(213) 894-4727 .,
correct.
Executed on December 2ih, 2010,
Joseph Zemik
BY:)·~
JOSEPH ZERNIK
2231 South Court
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (323) 521-6209
Facsimile (213) 261-9881
4/4
9: REQUEST FOR CM/ECF PASSWORD

11-01-07 Log Cabin Republicans V USA Et Al (10-56634) at The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion To Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers As Published in The Online PACER Dockets S

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

11-01-07 Log Cabin Republicans V USA Et Al (10-56634) at The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion To Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers As Published in The Online PACER Dockets S

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Digitally signed

11-01-08 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) - Motion to Intervene and

# Dkt Document Name Page

Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:30:59

RE: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) - Motion to Intervene

a. US Court of Appeal, 9th Circuit, Office of the Clerk

b. Counsel for the Defendants/Appellants

c. Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee

TO THE COURT AND TO COUNSEL FOR LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS

On January 6, or 7, 2011, Dr Joseph Zernik's Motion to intervene and

Therefore, absent access to the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity) there is no

Dated: January 8, 2010

Joseph Zernik, PhD

BY: Joseph Zernik, PhD

Court of Appeals Docket #: 10-56634 Docketed: 10/15/2010

Case Type Information:

Originating Court Information:

PACER Service Center

Court of Appeals Docket #: 10-56813 Docketed: 11/19/2010

Case Type Information:

Originating Court Information:

PACER Service Center

FOR THE NINTH CIRCillT

Log Cabin Republicans,

United States of America; Robert M Gates,

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1: [PROPOSED] INTERVENOR DR JOSEPH ZERNIK'S REQUEST TO

A. Table of Contents ... 1

B. List of Exhibits ... i

C. List of Cases and Courts ... iii

D. Table of Authorities ... 111

F. Request to File, Notice to Inform, and Motion To Intervene ... 3

H. Points & Authorities in re: Motion to Intervene ... 7

I. Points & Authorities in re: Intervention Per Se ... 11

K. Case Status ... 13

L. Request For Intervention & Prayer for Relief ... 14

M. Statement of Verification ... 15

1: Notice and Motion to Intervene

Exhibit 1:1: Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (2:04-cv-08425):

2: Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer

3: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate in re: Zernik v Connor et al

Exhibit 3:1: Zernikv Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550):

Exhibit 4:1: Fine v Sheriffet al (2:09-cv-01914):

6: Motion for a Declaratory Mandate in re: The NEFs as Currently Drafted

Exhibit 7:1: Fine v Sher£ff(2:09-cv-01914):

8: Request for Incorporation by Reference

9: Request for CMlECF Password

C. LIST OF CASES AND COURTS

1. Joseph Zernik v Jacqueline Connor et al (2:08-cv-0 1550), USDC, CACD

2. Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (2:04-cv-08425), USDC, CACD

3. Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634 and 10-56813), USCA, 9th

4. Richard I Fine v Sher£ffofLos Angeles County et al (2:09-cv-01914), USDC, CACD

5. Richard Fine v Sher£ffofLos Angeles County et al (09-56073), USCA, 9TH

Equal Protection Rights ... 3:5; 4:8; 7:7

Access to the Courts Rights ... 3:5; 4:8;7:3,6,9

First Amendment Rights ... 3:5; 5:2,3,6; 7:3,4,5,6;

Federal Due Process Rights ... 1:12; 3:5; 4:6,8; 5:4,6;

Code of Conduct of US Judge ... 1:3

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ... 1:1,2,5,6,8,9,10; 4:4,5

28 USC §1691 ... 1:6

28 USC §2071-7, Rule Making Enabling Act ... 5:4; 7:4

Brown v. Board o/Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) ... 7:9

777 F.2d462 ... 2:2