Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Please Note: This weekly agenda is subject to change. Please call 410-386-2043 to confirm a
meeting you plan to attend. All meetings will be held at the Carroll County Office Building
Room 311. (Unless otherwise noted)
Public Comment
Closed ~ Personnel
ACCESSIBILITY NOTICE: The Americans with Disabilities Act applies to the Carroll County Government and its programs, services,
activities, and facilities. If you have questions, suggestions, or complaints, please contact Ms. Jolene Sullivan, the Carroll County Government
Americans With Disabilities Act Coordinator, at 410-386-3600/1-888-302-8978 or MD Relay Service ~ 7-1-1/800-735-2258. The mailing
address is 225 North Center Street, Westminster, Maryland 21157.
Posted: 07/07/06
CARROLL COUNTY
a great place to live, a great place to work, a great place to play
Briefing Paper
January 4, 2011
Open Session
Issue:
Background:
Below is a list of Carroll County projects for the Board’s consideration for
inclusion in the long-range transportation plan. These projects have been
ranked and scored based on criteria that reflect goals and strategies
approved by the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board in October 2010.
The strategies were included to better define and rank the importance of
each specific project. The resulting criteria for ranking projects included the
project’s ability to:
Issue: FY 11 Budget Adjustments and Transfers for Carroll County Public Schools
Background:
State law stipulates that County Commissioners or County Councils approve the budget of their school system
both in total and by category. Any transfers made between categories or any nonlocal funds received by the
county school board after the adoption of the school budget must be approved by the County Commissioners or
County Councils.
Carroll County Public Schools Budget Adjustments 15 through 16 and Budget Transfers 11 through 13 were
approved by the Board of Education on December 8th, 2010.
Discussion:
Budget Adjustment No. 15 deappropriates $134,755 in formulaic federal funds for the Title I Targeted
Assistance grant for high poverty schools and aligns the budget with the approved annual grant application. It
reduces the number of Title I schools from 4 to 3 (removing William Winchester Elementary) and eliminates
2.0 full-time equivalent teacher positions for that school. Savings from reducing the number of schools covers
the decrease in the amount of the grant received compared to what was expected historically and also allows
funds from to be slightly increased for Student Transportation, Instructional Supplies and Materials, and Other
Instructional Costs. There are no impacts on local funds or obligations from these changes.
Budget Adjustment No. 16 appropriates $75,000 in State grant funds for the Maryland Science, Technology,
Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Initiative. This grant will support implementation of relevant
elementary curriculum, advancement of career awareness for middle school students, and summer externships
for teachers in STEM-related areas. Funds will be used for Instructional Wages (and related fringe charges),
Student Transportation, Mid-Level Administration (curriculum development), Instructional Supplies and
Materials, and Other Instructional Charges. There are no salaried positions and no impacts on local funds or
obligations from these changes.
Budget Transfer No. 11 impacts federal grant funds for English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL)
instruction. It moves funds from Instructional Supplies and Materials and Instructional Substitutes (and related
fringe charges) to Teacher Hourly Wages (and related fringe charges). A total of $4,667.50 is being moved by
the transfer. The budget changes are requested because the final grant budget has been approved and the
original school system budget was prepared before the grant application was finalized and approved.
Budget Transfer No. 12 impacts local funds for targeted academic intervention programs prepared for higher
poverty non-Title I schools. The funds were budgeted centrally in estimated line item amounts and allocated to
schools in lump amounts based on need. Administrators submitted plans to utilize these funds based on needs
at their individual schools which were reviewed and approved. The transfer moves funds from Teacher Hourly
Wages (and related fringe charges), Conferences, and Instructional Supplies and Materials to Hourly
Instructional Assistant Wages (and related fringe charges), Instructional Supplies and Materials, Student
Transportation, and Other Contracted Services. A total of $34,013.07 is being moved by the transfer. The
budget changes are requested to allow the funds to be released to schools in the line items the schools requested.
Budget Transfer No. 13 impacts State grant funds passed through the Local Management Board for the Parents
as Teachers Program. It moves funds from Teacher Hourly Wages (and related fringe charges) to Instructional
Supplies and Materials and Instructional Mileage Reimbursement. A total of $4,216.00 is being moved by the
transfer. The budget changes are requested because the final grant budget has been approved and the original
school system budget was prepared before the grant application was finalized and approved.
Purpose: Introduce the Grants Office and its function to the Board of Commissioners.
Background: The Grants Office was established in 1989 to provide a centralized focus on seeking, securing and managing
grants and to expand funding available to the county in support of the initiatives of the Board of Commissioners. The Grants
Office serves county agencies, partner agencies, non-profits and municipalities. Priority for service is to county agencies. The
Grants Office was established to assure that grant applications and matching funds are presented to the Board of Commissioners
for review and approval prior to submission. Procedures adopted by the Grants Office also record the acceptance of applications
and awards by the Commissioners and inform applicant agencies of the responsibilities to carry out the grant in accordance with
grant obligations.
Granting entities generally offer funds to develop new programming or expand existing programs to serve an identified need.
Grantors prefer to fund programs that follow best practices or evidence based programs that have shown capacity to meet
performance and outcome measures.
Current Process:
1) Upon notice of a potential grant application, Grants staff members propose a timeline to the applicant agency so that
the grant can be developed and presented to the Board of Commissioners within the required timeframe.
2) New grants that are requesting county match are presented to the Board of Commissioners requesting permission to
develop the grant. This reduces staff time devoted to the grant should the Board wish not to apply.
3) Continuing grants are developed, edited, reviewed by Grants, Budget and the County Attorney’s Office prior to Board
review.
4) Upon Board of Commissioner approval, the grant is submitted as required by the grantor.
5) Grants that receive an award are reviewed by the requesting agency and Grants staff to assure the award matches the
applicant need. The award is then submitted to the County Attorney’s Office for review of legal sufficiency and then to
the Board for review and approval.
Award to application ratio for past five years: 340 of 396 grants or 85.85% of applications were funded. There are 11
applications that are pending decision.
Total audited Federal grants from FY 2005 through FY 2010 equaled $70,523,211.*
* Public Works, Economic Development, Farm Preservation grants have not historically been processed through the Grants
Office and account for a portion of the difference between the grant totals.
Submitted By:
Colleen Baumgartner
December 30, 2010
Issue:
Approval to accept grant funds from the Chesapeake Bay Trust (CBT) Watershed Assistance Grant Program
for the development of a watershed characterization plan in the Snowden’s Run Watershed.
Background:
In response to goals specified in our National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit
relating to assessment of water quality within all of our watersheds; we are actively looking at ways in which to
offset the cost associated with these efforts. Partnerships with neighboring jurisdictions, the local community, the
Board of Education, and other governmental entities are steps in the right direction. The Chesapeake Bay Trust
(CBT) and the Maryland Department of Natural Resources solicited grant applications last summer for their 2010-
2011 Watershed Assistance Grant Program. These grants are designed to support watershed planning efforts and the
design of watershed restoration projects in Maryland. Planning projects include watershed characterizations,
surveys, assessments, action plans, or financing strategies. Local governments were invited to submit requests for
watershed planning assistance. The planning efforts were to consist of watershed characterizations which would
include establishing a baseline of watershed conditions from which progress can be evaluated and to create a
framework for identifying future restoration projects.
An application was submitted on September 24, 2010 requesting funds to complete a watershed
characterization for a portion of the Snowden’s Run Watershed located in southern Carroll County. The Snowden’s
Run 12-digit watershed is located in the southern portion of the Liberty Reservoir 8-digit watershed, adjacent to the
reservoir. Snowden’s Run includes the designated growth area of Eldersburg, and as such, urban development
accounts for approximately 32% of the land use, while agriculture occupies only 15% in the watershed. This study
will provide a unique opportunity for local outreach to watershed residents, the public school system, and other
interested parties. Factors relating to choosing this watershed for comprehensive characterization were as follows:
Drains directly to the Liberty Reservoir, a major drinking water source for the Baltimore metropolitan
region;
Liberty Reservoir discharges to the Patapsco River and ultimately to the Bay;
Is highly urbanized and the potential for water quality improvement are greater than other areas in the
county; and
Over $622,000 was requested from the Watershed Assistance Grant Program with only $216,000 available
to fund projects. Carroll County was very fortunate to have the Snowden’s Run Watershed Characterization project
selected and 100% of the requested $27,177.00 was awarded to fully fund the intended work plan.
Action:
The Department of Planning is requesting approval from the Board of County Commissioners to
accept $27,177 in federal funds for this project.
Second _________________________________________
Approved: _________________________________________
Denied: _________________________________________
Signed: _________________________________________
Project Name: Modification - American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Public Transportation Capital Grants
Department/Agency: Department of Planning
Funding Agency: Maryland Department of Transportation with pass through funds from the Federal Department of
Transportation
Deadline: January 17, 2010
Summary: In May 2009 the Board accepted the award of $1,569,703 in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
funds for capital projects for public transportation. The total award will remain the same; however, some of the line item costs
have changed and approval of the modified award is required.
Briefing Paper
January 4, 2011
Open Session
Issue:
Background:
On October 19, 2010, the Carroll County Planning Commission approved the 2010 Carroll
County Master Plan. This action followed a series of work sessions held by the Planning
Commission to review and modify the recommendations of the revised draft plan. The revised
draft reflected an update to the text of the adopted 2000 Carroll County Master Plan to reflect
more recent data, items already implemented, and legislative requirements enacted since 2000.
Following the initial set of work sessions, the Planning Commission released the draft for public
review and held a public hearing on August 19, 2010. The Commission met for another set of
work sessions in early September to address changes to the draft based on comments received.
On January 11, 2011, the Board will hold a work session with the Carroll County Planning
Commission to discuss the recommended 2010 Carroll County Master Plan: Challenges &
Choices. In preparation for this work session, on January 4, staff will review the updates that
were needed. Key recommendations will be highlighted, with more in-depth discussion
anticipated to occur during the work session with the Planning Commission.
Action:
For Board’s information in preparation for work session with the Planning Commission on
January 11, 2011