Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://utopianrealism.blogspot.com
2010
Blog Archive
▼ 2010 (217)
o ▼ December (20)
o ► November (25)
o ► October (31)
o ► September (24)
o ► August (17)
o ► July (3)
o ► June (5)
o ► May (12)
o ► April (20)
o ► March (25)
o ► February (11)
o ► January (24)
► 2009 (109)
► 2008 (41)
▼ December (20)
o Minding animals: Pre-Lecture Events news
o New York presentation confirmed
o MAO: First meeting carried out
o Norwegian HAS anthology: Book proposal submitted
2
Existentialist electronica
The Schopenhauer Experience music player
My profile at Academia.edu
CV (in English)
Philosophy business [in Norwegian]
About Me
Morten Tønnessen
Brief academic CV
1 PhD student at Department of Semiotics, University of Tartu
2 Supervisor: Kalevi Kull (UT)
3 Supplementary supervisor: Winfried Nöth (Universität Kassel/Catholic University of São
Paulo)
4 Title of PhD thesis: "Umwelt Transition: Uexküllian Phenomenology. An Ecosemiotic
Analysis of Norwegian Wolf Management"
5 Main researcher in the 2008-2010 research project "The Cultural Heritage of Environmental
Spaces. A Comparative Analysis Between Estonia and Norway" (EEA--ETF Grant EMP 54 -
participating until Sept. 30, 2010)
6 A Principal Investigator in Timo Maran´s research project (2009-2012) "Dynamical
Zoosemiotics and Animal Representations" ( ETF/ESF 7790)
7 Senior personnel (2010-2011) in Kalevi Kull's research project "Biosemiotic models of
semiosis" (ETF/EST 8403)
8 Personnel in the Center of Excellence in Cultural Theory (CECT) semiotics research group
'Meaning-generation and transdisciplinary methodology of semiotic analysis of culture'
9 Main organizer of the Tartu workshops on the semiotics/phenomenology of perception
(Feb. 2009)
9.1 Guest-editor, with Kati Lindström, of special issue of Biosemiotics (3(3)), 'Semiotics of
Perception' (2010)
9.2 Guest-editor, with Riin Magnus and Nelly Mäekivi, of special issue of Hortus Semioticus
(no. 6), 'Semiotics of nature' (2010)
9.3 Member of the editorial board of the journal Biosemiotics
9.4 Lecturer in the history of philosophy at University of Agder (UiA), autumn 2009
9.5 Examiner (Examen Philosophicum) at University of Stavanger, 2009 - 2010
9.6 Research assistant of the UiA research project "Multimodalitet, leseopplæring og
læremidler (MULL)", 2009-2010
9.7 Lecturer of philosophy in Antiquity at University of Agder (UiA), autumn 2010
Past events
Semiotics of Perception - special issue of BIOSEMIOTICS (vol. 3, no. 3 - December 2010)
Kriminalpolitisk seminar (Oslo, November 11th)
SI of Hortus Semioticus 'Semiotics of nature'
The 60th International Congress of Phenomenology (Bergen, Aug. 10-13, 2010)
Gatherings in Biosemiotics 10 (Braga, Portugal, June 22-27, 2010)
52nd research seminar of the Scandinavian Research Council for Criminology: Globalization
in criminology (Hønefoss, May 10-12, 2010)
Spatiality, memory and visualisation of culture/nature relationships: theoretical aspects
(Tallinn, October 22-24th 2009)
10th World Congress in Semiotics (Spain, September 22-26, 2009)
First World Congress on Environmental History (Copenhagen, August 4-8th 2009)
Gatherings in Biosemiotics 9 (Prague, June 30th - July 4th 2009)
Climate change: Global Risks, Challanges and Decisions (Copenhagen, March 2009)
Workshop: The Ecology of Perception. Landscapes in Culture and Nature (2009)
Workshop: Animal Minds (2009)
What's wrong with nature? (2008)
Epistemology
Ontology
Phenomenology (especially eco-)
Philosophy of science (especially biology)
Semiotic economy
Wolf ecology and wildlife management
The first two events have now taken place - in Utrecht, the Netherlands, and in Sydney, Australia.
More info at the Pre-conference events page of MAI. No less than 30 cities are mentioned in the
second bulletin as potential event locations.
/
The Oslo event (now scheduled for October 14-15, 2011 and enveloping one and a half day of
program) is mentioned in the following fashion:
There will also be a number of local speakers and participants. It is a small but intensive
interdisciplinary workshop at the borders of animal behaviour science, the ecological humanities and
Continental philosophy, under the auspices of the Macquarie University Animals and Society Working
Group within the Centre for Research on Social Inclusion. Though space is limited, if you are working
in the history and philosophy of ethology and would like to participate, please contact Matthew
Chrulew at: mchrulew@gmail.com
/
Please note that a public lecture is also being planned; details of which may also be obtained by
contacting Matthew.
-
Kristian Bjørkdahl is not joining us after all, but have in stead suggested Martin Lee Mueller, also of
Centre for Development and the Environment, who now has joined our organizing team (eco-
phenomenological, deep ecological master thesis, 2008: Symphony of Silences: A Journey Through a
Multicentric World).
-
The MAO event will now for sure span over 2 days, October 14-15, 2011. The task for the participants
for Saturday October 15th will be to work out and compose a manifesto on the relationship between
academia and activism with regard to human-animal relations.
Labels: academia and activism, Centre for Development and the Environment, deep ecology, eco-
phenomenology, HAS manifesto, manifesto, MAO, Minding Animals, multicentrism, Oslo, Rio de
Janeiro
1. Understanding conflicts
And today I received the offprints of my single-authored articles in that issue, "Wolf land" and "Steps
to a semiotics of being". The latter in particular means a lot to me.
Labels: Fædrelandsvennen, Norway, Norwegian wolf management, Southern wolf, wolf hunting
Around the time of my visit to Tartu the last week of November I received the news that a new
translation of Jakob von Uexküll has just been published:
A FORAY INTO THE WORLDS OF ANIMALS AND HUMANS, with A Theory of Meaning
By Jakob von Uexküll
Translated by Joseph D. O'Neil
Introduction by Dorion Sagan
Afterword by Geoffrey Winthrop Young
University of Minnesota Press | 280 pages | 2010
It is neither the first nor the last time these texts are translated, but it will be interesting to compare
it with both the originals (Bedeutungslehre and Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und
Menschen) and the other existing translation of each text.
I have now scheduled with my supervisor Kalevi Kull that I will, as an assignment for the doctoral
seminar of autumn 2010, carry out a review of the translation (whether for publication or not).
Labels: Bedeutungslehre, Jakob von Uexküll, posthumanities, Streifzüge, translations, Umwelt theory
Labels: 2011, Arne Næss, criminology, deep ecology, green criminology, HAS, illegal hunting,
Kriminalpolitisk seminar, Nils Christie, Oslo, philosophical comedy, philosophy business, the wolf as
symbol
There's plenty of meaningful work to be done - including, on the travel scene, visits to destinations in
Norway, Sweden, Estonia and beyond (Yellowstone, Wolf park, Alaska, Canada, Russia).
So far I have been working with wolves (some of them being more cooperative than others) since
2006.
15
Labels: Alaska, Canada, Department of semiotics, environmental semiotics, Estonia, Norway, Russia,
Sweden, Tartu semiotics, University of Tartu, wolf studies, Yellowstone
The editors of the book, to be published by Mouton de Gruyter, are Paul Forsell and Rick Littlefield.
Labels: Biosemiosis, Eero Tarasti, existential semiosis, existential semiotics, Existential universals,
Transcending Signs
At the seminar, I gave a talk entitled 'En økosemiotisk analyse av norsk ulveforvaltning' (An
ecosemiotic analysis of Norwegian wolf management). I also got the chance to meet a lot of wolf
ethologists whose work I had previously only read, not heard presented in person.
The book store at Koppang, Stor-Elvdal - "read about handicapped Emilie and her dramatic fight for
survival in the wilderness of Østerdalen".
17
Rendalen (Åkrestrømmen).
Rendalen report
I have not yet reported from my field trip to Rendalen municipality in the Norwegian region of
Hedmark, cf. post on plans (but the visit has already triggered both reflection and academic
production, cf. my article 'Visjon 2040' and my research seminar presentation on the nature view and
worldview of people in Rendalen).
The trip took place October 28 - November 2nd. The most important work carried out consisted in
conducting 8 interviews, with:
• RENDALEN municipality
• Major
• Consultant, agrigulture
19
• STOR-ELVDAL municipality
In Rendalen, I was particularly pleased to hear about ROSAREN, a project designed to look into the
potential for local business dependent on, or not in conflict with, the presence of big carnivores
including wolves.
Labels: field trip, Hedmark, interviews, Norwegian wolf management, PhD studies, Rendalen,
ROSAREN, The cultural semiotic of wolves and sheep
The topic was the knowledge theories of Aristotle, Descartes and Hume, and their potential
applicability in nursing.
Contents
* En hybrid forteller
* De to Norger
* Rendalen og verden
* Konspirasjon og kunnskap
20
* To natursyn
* Nederlagets symboler
* Levende bygder - på trygd
* Sannheten om sau og ulv
* Fra status quo til hva nå?
* Ikke mer skjebnetro!
* Rasjonelt og rasjonelt, fru Blom
* Rikdommens paradokser
* Norge 2040 (Utopi Buane)
Labels: Buane, Rendalen, Samtiden, Utopia, Visjon 2040, wolf wars, wolves and sheep
The latest Nordic green criminology newsletter, administered by Rune Ellefsen, mentions these six
articles indirectly and also the Oslo Minding Animals event to take place October 14th, 2011.
Labels: criminology, eco-global criminology, green criminology, illegal hunting, Minding Animals,
Scandinavian wolf management, wolf hunting
Reported missing:
* My song "Herfra til ingensteder" [From here to nowhere]
* Its lyrics
* My song "Alene (på en stein i mørket)" [Alone (on a stone in the dark)]
* Its lyrics
* An original illustration of my own making - of a 'global ontological map'
Labels: Amazones, chronopod, David Wood, eco-phenomenology, ecoart, Ontological map, the
Schopenhauer Experience
21
Labels: Antikkens filosofi, Philosophy in Antiquity, philosophy lecturer, teaching, University of Agder
Australia plans
The title of my talk at the international collaborative workshop on the history and philosophy of
ethology, to take place in Sydney February 19-21, will be "Bad dog: An Uexküllian Analysis of
Norwegian Wolf Management". 45 min.
I have arranged flight tickets - will be leaving Europe February 15th and return March 4th (in
Australia February 17th - March 3rd). The workshop organizers provide me with accommodation in
Sydney for February 17-22, the remaining 9 days I intend to spend in the Blue Mountains, working on
completing my thesis.
Labels: 2011, Australia, Bad dog, Blue Mountains, Ethology, Norwegian wolf management, PhD
thesis, philosophy of ethology, Sydney, Uexküll
Following the coordinating efforts of MIA's convenor Rod Bennison, we have agreed to move the
event from the originally planned October 25th, 2011, to Friday October 14th.
Labels: Minding Animals, Minding Animals International, Oslo, pre-conference events, roundtable,
shared worlds
The journalist Tarald Reinholt Aas generously allowed me to publish the uncut version of the
interview text in my Norwegian language blog Utopisk Realisme. There I have further posted a reply
to Helge Fossen ("Hva er en sau verdt?" [How much is a sheep worth?]).
Labels: Agder, Fædrelandsvennen, interview, media, Norwegian wolf management, Southern wolf
There were five other talks - by my colleagues Timo Maran, Jelena Grigorjeva, Kadri Tüür, Silver
Rattasepp and Nelly Mäekivi.
Labels: Dynamical zoosemiotics and animal representations, Hedmark, nature view, Norwegian wolf
management, Rendalen
Labels: Dynamical zoosemiotics and animal representations, Futures of Zoosemiotics, grant meeting,
roundtable, Zoosemiotics and Animal representations
And: I will be giving an intensive course next term, perhaps in March, worktitled "Semiotics and
phenomenology". This is to get required credits in Teaching Practice. Details will follow. Readings will
include Peirce, Uexküll, Husserl and Merleau-Ponty.
The department is vivid as ever with two classes of international master students...
24
Uexküllian Foray
It was only yesterday that I discovered that a new translation of Uexküll has been published by
University of Minnesota Press, in the Posthumanities series (volume 12). The book is entitled A Foray
into the Worlds of Animals and Humans - with A Theory of Meaning, and envelops - surprise surprise
- Streifzüge plus Bedeutungslehre. I am looking forward to check out the translation (which has been
carried out by Joseph D. O'Neil).
Integrated biological individualism and the primacy of the individual level of biological
organization
In ‘Umwelt Transitions: Uexküll and Environmental Change’ (Biosemiotics 2.2) I introduced the notion
of integrated biological individualism, according to which the individual, or more precisely
organismic, level should occupy the centre—the middle ground—of methodology in the life sciences,
at the crossroad where the somatic realm encounters the ecological one. The term was then included
in a broader programmatic treatment in ‘Steps to a Semiotics of Being’ (Biosemiotics 3.3). From the
standpoint of the individual, or organism, we can describe how an individual organism is constituted
as a biological body, as well as how nature as a global ecological system is constituted by individual
organisms and their interrelations. Nature, then, is a body of bodies (the ultimate superorganism);
and any individual self is by its nature a social self – through its interrelation with others, a self is
always bigger than itself.
In this paper I will expand upon the notion of integrated biological individualism by relating it more
explicitly to the suggested primacy of the individual level of biological organization. As Anton Markoš
remarks (Readers of the Book of Life: Contextualizing Developmental Evolutionary Biology (2002): 29),
life “proceeds synchronously on innumerable space, time, and organizational levels. Nothing on any
single level can reveal its essence”. Yet, it remains that a biological science with no concern for, or
interest in, the living themselves (qua living beings – at the level of the individual) would be deeply
problematic. There is no doubt that the ‘genetic turn’ in biology has been successful in terms of
scientific understanding, but the new microscopic realm that has opened up to us has simultaneously
25
induced us to neglect the ‘life-size’ realm. What future can we envision for the critical task of Umwelt
mapping?
After a general introduction to this topic matter I will introduce an original, tentatively all-inclusive
model of various levels of biosemiosis. According to this model there are six levels of biosemiosis,
falling under three broader categories.
Intra-cellular semiosis
Inter-cellular semiosis
Intra-organismic semiosis
Inter-organismic semiosis*
Extra-organismic semiosis
Super-organismic semiosis*
The tripartite model is relevant for simple and complex life forms alike (though in the case of very
simple – non-social – creatures it collapses into a two-category model). As it demonstrates,
perception is at the core of biosemiosis, even though not all biosemiosis is perceptual, and even
though perception constitutes but one level (or layer) of biosemiosis. The standing of perception is
intimately tied to the standing of the individual. With such an overall model of biosemiosis, the
individual organism (and its lifeworld) is methodologically placed at the center of biological research.
This paper will dwell on the presentation of an original, tentatively all-inclusive model of various
levels of biosemiosis, aiming at a treatment first and foremost of perception. According to this model
there are six levels of biosemiosis, falling under three broader categories.
Intra-cellular semiosis
Inter-cellular semiosis
Intra-organismic semiosis
Inter-organismic semiosis*
Extra-organismic semiosis
Super-organismic semiosis*
The tripartite model is relevant for simple and complex life forms alike (though in the case of very
simple – non-social – creatures it collapses into a two-category model). As it demonstrates,
perception is at the core of biosemiosis, even though not all biosemiosis is perceptual, and even
though perception is but one level (or layer) of biosemiosis. The standing of perception is tied to the
standing of the individual. With such a model of biosemiosis, the individual organism (and its
lifeworld) is methodologically placed at the center of biological research.
Such a perception-oriented model of biosemiosis has implications for cultural studies as well. Applied
on humans, it evokes a perspective in which the human mind, or soul – as Plato and Aristotle would
have it, but in a radically different sense – partakes in three realms. Perceptual semiosis (which is
‘social’ in the primal sense of being related to the active navigating of an individual) is grounded in
somatic semiosis, and interacting with a yet higher (more complex) level, namely that of
superorganisms – e.g., society, or an animal population. It is on this highest, more-than-individual
level that society’s often indiscernible yet absolutely principal influence on how individual members
of society carry out their lives is to be located.
27
According to the abovementioned tripartite model of the levels of biosemiosis, cells and organisms
(individuals, where applicable) are the primary substances of the biological world, though there are
also larger wholes. It may perhaps shed new light on the notions of endosemiosis and exosemiosis,
which is usually conceived of as semiosis that is internal and external to the body respectively. In our
tripartite model, the boundary between ‘the outer’ and ‘the inner’ is in flux depending on the level of
biosemiosis considered. It is thus possible to argue that endo- and exo-semiosis occurs both at the
somatic level and the social level, and that in a global ecological perspective all semiosis is ultimately
endosemiosis.
This comprehensive model will be supplemented by a simple model of the interrelations of the sign-
relation phenomena of signification, communication and representation in a conceptualized Umwelt.
Depending on whether the dominant cognitive processing (if dominated it be) is of a significational,
communicational or representational nature, some people will perceive in a way that is dominantly
based on immediate (unmediated) perception, social perception (included herein extremist
autocommunicative perception) or symbolic perception – though most well-functioning individuals
are more balanced.
Contents:
257-261 Kati LINDSTRÖM and Morten TØNNESSEN: Introduction to the Special Issue Semiotics of
Perception: Being in the World of the Living - Semiotic Perspectives
277-287 Wendy WHEELER: Delectable Creatures and the Fundamental Reality of Metaphor:
Biosemiotics and Animal Mind
299-313 Renata SÕUKAND and Raivo KALLE: Plant as Object within Herbal Landscape: Different Kinds
28
of Perception
315-329 Timo MARAN: Why Was Thomas A. Sebeok Not a Cognitive Ethologist? From "Animal Mind"
to "Semiotic Self"
331-345 Ane FAUGSTAD AARØ: Merleau-Ponty's Concept of Nature and the Ontology of Flesh
347-357 Kalevi KULL: Ecosystems are Made of Semiosic Bonds: Consortia, Umwelten, Biophony and
Ecological Codes
In this issue I have co-edited 136 pages, written 27 pages on my own and co-written 5 pages
(altogether taken part in the writing of 32 pages).
Labels: Being in the world of the living, Biosemiotics, editorship, Semiotics of perception, special
issue, Steps to a semiotics of being, Wolf land
Labels: conferences, Semiotica, Tartu conference, Umwelt, Umwelt trajectory, wolves and sheep,
Zoosemiotics and Animal representations
Research summary
A few days ago I wrote a 1-2p summary of my sub-project partaking in the research project The
Cultural Heritage of Environmental Spaces. It will appear as published eventually.
Labels: agriculture, future of agriculture, Norwegian wolf management, rural policies, Samtiden,
Visjon 2040, wolf conservation
In the meantime, Minding Animals International has gone public with a list of cities where pre-
conference events are being planned or considered.
Minding Animals International is proud to announce that several events are being planned before
the next Minding Animals Conference.
Events are at various stages of development, and workshops, lectures, exhibitions or seminars in at
least Abu Dhabi, Brisbane, Cape Town, Christchurch, Delhi, London (x2), New York, Oslo, Rennes,
San Francisco, Sydney (x2), Wollongong, Uppsala and Utrecht, are now being considered.
The First Pre-conference Event is an expert meeting scheduled for Utrecht on 29 and 30 November,
2010, followed by a Second Event in Sydney on 3 December, 2010, a public lecture by Professor Marc
Bekoff.
Labels: animal studies, horses, Marc Bekoff, Minding Animals International, Nordic HAS, Oslo, pre-
conference events, shared worlds, Utrecht, Wolves
Morten Tønnessen 2010. Når villdyret overvåkes. Ny Tid no. 39 2010 (November 5-11), p32-34.
Note that I have listed three corrections (one is rather a precisation) in my Norwegian language blog
Utopisk Realisme, concerning the use of ear-tags/chips in management, the practice of captures, and
a statement by the major of Rendalen.
Labels: chronicles, Norwegian wolf management, Ny Tid, wolf conservation, wolf ecology
It is one of six papers in the section "Økologisk kriminalitet" (Ecological crime), along with papers by
Guri Larsen, Sigurd S. Dybing, Rune Ellefsen, Nicolay B. Johansen ("The problem with green
criminology") and Per-Anders Svärd.
Contents:
* Intro
* From extermination campaigns to coservation policies
* Perception and symbolism
* Hunting ethics
* Concluding observations
Labels: criminology, green criminology, research seminar, Scandinavian wolf management, wolf
hunting
In other words, I will be presenting some observations from my field trip to Rendalen/Stor-Elvdal,
which concludes today.
This time the seminar will be for members of the research team only.
Labels: Dynamical zoosemiotics and animal representations, Hedmark, Norwegian wolf management,
Rendalen, research seminar, wolves and sheep, zoosemiotics
The talk will take place November 11th at 14.15-16.00 in room 770, Domus Nova. For thematic
details, cf. the link under the title.
Labels: eco-criminology, illegal hunting, Kriminalpolitisk seminar, Nils Christie, Norwegian wolf
management, wolf ecology, wolf hunting
What's more, yesterday I finished my invited chronicle "Hvem er villest i landet her? - Et ulveliv"
[Who's the wildest in the country here? - A wolf's life] for the weekly news magazine Ny Tid. This is
the most thourough account I've given on wolf management so far in Norwegian. The chronicle,
which is in part based on my article in Humanimalia, will appear this Friday.
Contents:
32
* Intro
* Ulvetider [Wolf times]
* Sky, men skutt [Shy, but shot]
* Menneskelige gjenstander i ulvens verden [Human artifacts in the wolf's world]
* Ulven og dens følgesvenner [The wolf and its /companions/]
* Om rovviltforvaltningens fremtid [On the future of wildlife/carnivore management]
Labels: Aftenposten, chronicles, Humanimalia, Is a wolf..., letter to the editor, Norwegian wolf
management, Ny Tid, wildness
In addition to these three locations, I'll also be visiting Øvre Rendal/Bergset (Rendalen) and Evenstad
(Stor-Elvdal). In other words I'll be visiting one region (Hedmark) - two municipalities - five villages.
We've also agreed on a timeline, or schedule, for our editorial work, with tasks and deadlines
organized in 15 points. We expect to submit the formal book proposal at some point in December.
Full-length papers should be submitted by May 31st, 2011, and revised, final papers by September
30th, 2011. Expected completion of the manuscript (after a round or two of proof-reading) is
preliminary set to January 15th, 2012. We expect to submit the formal book proposal at some point
in December. The whole process will last up to 2 years.
33
Labels: animal studies, editing, editorship, Rodopi, The Semiotics of Animal Representations,
timeline, Zoosemiotics and Animal representations
Scholars and others can apply for a free subscription (electronic or paper).
The first issue of the new Nature journal will be published next April.
Posted by Morten Tønnessen at 06:16 0 comments
FIELD TRIP: Hedmark (Rendalen + Stor-Elvdal municipalities), October 29th - November 2nd
RESEARCH VISIT: Oslo II, November 10th-12th
RESEARCH VISIT: Trondheim, November 15th-17th
I was hoping to visit Namsskogan Familiepark (the fourth place in Norway that houses captive
wolves) as well, but unfortunately there is no time for it, - since it was not included in my original
plans, it cannot be made a priority right now.
Even with "only" these three remaining trips (on top of my 7-day visit to Tartu late November), I will
spend approximately 60 hours on trains and train stations the next 5-6 weeks, and travel
approximately 1200 + 700 + 1600 = 3500 km (plus 2800 km Kristiansand-Oslo-Tallinn-Tartu and back,
a total of 6300 km, which pretty exactly corresponds to the distance from here on Earth's surface to
its center).
Labels: captive wolves, Earth, field trip, Hedmark, Namsskogan familiepark, Oslo, research visit,
Trondheim
Labels: exam, examiner, philosophy, Philosophy in Antiquity, philosophy lecturer, University of Agder
Labels: Antikkens filosofi, Filosofisk forum, Kristiansand, Philosophy in Antiquity, University of Agder
"Plant as Object within Herbal Landscape: Different Kinds of Perception", which is being published as
part of Biosemiotics' special issue Semiotics of Perception (for which I am a guest editor along with
Kati Lindström), constitutes part of the dissertation (publication III out of I-VI).
Renata has had Kalevi Kull as supervisor, as do I. Almo Farina (Urbino) and Myrdene Anderson
(Purdue) will serve as opponents at the defense of the thesis November 9th.
Labels: dissertation, Dissertationes Semioticae, Herbal Landscape, PhD thesis, Renata Sõukand, Tartu
semiotics, University of Tartu
Proof-reading, indexing
A week or two ago I spent 20 hours or so proof-reading and compiling an index for the forthcoming
book Begynneropplæring i en sammensatt tekstkultur [approximately "Initial education in a complex
textual culture"], which is written (mostly) by Elise Seip Tønnessen and Magnhild Vollan and about to
be published by Høyskoleforlaget. This work was related to my engagement as a research assistant
for a research project on multimodality, cf. previous posts.
The other invite was from InTech, and signed by a Niksa Mandic. The book in question has the
worktitle Globalization. "You are invited to participate in this book project based on your paper
"Steps to a Semiotics of Being"...", I am told in the otherwise standardized email. Again, the theme is
relevant for me. But while Nova doesn't charge its authors (unless they choose to make use of extra
services/functions - open access included), InTech has the courage to ask for 590 Euro from each
author. With up to 50 contributors per volume, it is pretty clear that their business model is not so
much based on selling books as on profiting on complimenting scholars by inviting them to publish.
They present themselves as an open access publisher, but their claim that each of their chapters are
downloaded 1.000 times a month does not appear to be legitimate, if you check with their latest
online publications.
Labels: academic publishers, academic publishing, globalization, InTech, Nova Science Publishers,
publishing houses, semioethics, Semiotics: Theory and applications
This will be the first of these gatherings to take place in the US (2001-2010 all conferences took place
in Europe - see here for a list of venues).
In the process I gathered quite a lot of more or less historical material on Norwegian wolf legislation
etc., some of it dating back to 1845. Both encounters as well proved to be very informative.
Posted by Morten Tønnessen at 07:14 0 comments
Labels: Norwegian wolf management, Oslo, research visit, Scandinavian wolf management
We've also come up with a work title for the book: The Semiotics of Animal Representations.
Labels: Nature Culture and Literature, Rodopi, The Semiotics of Animal Representations,
Zoosemiotics and Animal representations
37
The topic matter of these classes/seminars will be the following three texts:
* Plato's The Republic - book 1 (Norwegian: Staten)
* Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (Norwegian: Den nikomakiske etikk)
* Augustine's On free choice of the will [De libero arbitrio] (Norwegian: Om den frie vilje)
Labels: Antikkens filosofi, Aristotle, Augustine, Philosophy in Antiquity, philosophy lecturer, Plato,
University of Agder
Apropos Oslo - popularly called "Tigerstaden" (City of the tiger) - here's the tiger statue at
Jernbarnetorvet (the railway square), photographed in the cosy Northern winter.
38
And here's the symbol of the state - the lion - in front of Stortinget, the Norwegian parliament. The
parliament is routinely referred to as "Løvebakken" (loosely: Hill of the lion).
I expect to touch upon these exotic Norwegian creatures either in "The Cultural Semiotic of Wolves
and Sheep" or "The Symbolic Construction of the Big Bad Wolf in Contemporary Scandinavia" (see
Article for Signs).
Labels: lion, Løvebakken, Oslo, Oslo animals, the big bad wolf, The cultural semiotic of wolves and
sheep, The symbolic construction, tiger, Tigerstaden
At a second research visit to Oslo, in November, I intend to meet with a number of relevant scholars
and researchers.
Labels: Alpha-gruppen, Animal Zoolution, national library, Oslo, research visit, Runar Næss, Statistics
Norway, wolf studies
39
Apropos (3): The last 10 days I've written two reports - the last quarterly report partaking in the
research project "The Cultural Heritage of Environmental Spaces" (4pp), and an interim report
partaking in the research project "Dynamical Zoosemiotics and Animal Representations".
Labels: being an academic, cultural heritage, Dynamical zoosemiotics and animal representations,
Reports, research project
The grant has not been given before because thus far I've received a monthly stipend partaking in the
research project "The Cultural heritage of Environmental Spaces" (where my participation ended in
September). If successful, an application for a new research project, "Environmental Semiotics:
Theory and Applications in Changing Culture and Environment" would imply me being an
'Extraordinary researcher' with full work-load starting January 2011.
Labels: cultural heritage, Department of semiotics, environmental semiotics, research project, state
grant, University of Tartu
Labels: University of Agder, University of Oslo, University of Stavanger, University of Tartu, world
ranking
Abstract:
Modern humans spend much of their time deploying a very rarefied form of intelligence,
manipulating abstract symbols while their muscled body is mostly inert. Other animals, in a constant
and largely unmediated relation with their earthly surroundings, think with the whole of their bodies.
This kind of distributed sentience, this intelligence in the limbs, is especially keen in the case of birds
of flight. Unlike most creatures of the ground, who must traverse an opaque surface of only two-plus
dimensions as we make our way through the world, a soaring bird continually adjusts minute muscles
in its wings to navigate an omnidimensional plenum of currents and interference patterns that alter
from moment to moment. Flight itself may usefully be considered as a kind of thinking—as a sort of
gliding within the mind. Moreover, since birds are commonly the most mobile inhabitants of any
woodland, able to fly over and scan numerous events occurring on the ground, their varied
utterances provide a crucial source of information for many other animals. This paper, written as a
philosophic essay, explores avian cognition from a phenomenological standpoint. It then reflects
upon the vocalizations of birds—noting the major role that such avian calls, cries, and songs have
played in the development of human culture.
Keywords
Abram's article is part of the special issue 'Semiotics of Perception', which I am guest-editing along
with Kati Lindström. The print edition is due for publication in December, as Biosemiotics 3(3). All
papers in the special issue are somehow connected to the Feb. 2009 Phenomenology meets
Semiotics (where Culture meets Nature) events in Tartu, Estonia.
Labels: Langedrag, Langedrag mountain farm and wildlife park, wolf imagery, wolv videos
30km from the wolf enclosures, in the village of Nesbyen, I saw this poster advertising for a sheepy
event.
43
Say no more.
44
Cf. also:
I will further make a few remarks on the partial resemblance between Uexküllian
phenomenology and Tymieniecka‘s ‗phenomenology of life‘, and its difference from the
‗phaneroscopy‘ of Peirce.
Labels: 2012, Semiotica, Umwent trajectory, wolves and sheep, zoosemiotics, Zoosemiotics and
Animal representations
48
This peculiar little story envelops in my Norwegian language blog, Utopisk Realisme ("Hvilket er
Norges beste universitet?").
Labels: Norway, Norwegian universities, THE, Times Higher Education, top universities, University of
Bergen, University of Oslo, world ranking
Videos are in the process of being uploaded to You Tube (MrMortenTonnessen's channel).
Labels: animal videos, captive animals, captive wolves, Langedrag, Norway, pics, pictures, wolf
conservation, wolf ecology
49
If the application proves successful, it will imply that I establish ties to the University of Tartu for the
years after I have completed my PhD (beyond my obligations partaking in the research project
Dynamical Zoosemiotics and Animal Representations, until 2012).
Contents:
3. The confinement
5. Wolf senses
Labels: captive wolves, field trip, Polar Zoo, summary report, wolf ecology, work paper, zoo animals,
zoological garden
50
Today I received my copy of David Abram's long awaited Becoming Animal: An Earthly Cosmology. At
Amazon it has now climbed to no. 2.801 of the millions of books on offer - it is right now ranked as
no. 1 in 'Phenomenology', no. 3 in 'Epistemology' and no. 7 in 'Ecology'.
A couple of warm dialogues with physicist Brian Swimme helped hone certain reflections, as did
conversations with a broad range of luminous souls, among them Jay Griffiths, Kalevi Kull, Wendell
Berry, David Cayley, Patrick Curry, Donna House, Omar Zubaedi, Georg Glazner, Eva Simms, Tom Jay,
Will Adams, Niel Thiese, Morten Tonnessen, Stefan Lang-Gilliatt, Maya Ward, Jan van Boekel,
Deborah Bird Rose, Ed Casey, Bill Plotkin, Keren Abrams, Steve Talbott, Craig Holdrege, Eileen Crist,
the late and much missed Briagn Goodwin, Peter Adams, Chris Wells, Jennifer Sahn, Jon Young, Peter
Manchester, and Arthur Zajonc.
Other Norwegians mentioned: Arne Naess, Per Ingvar Haukeland and Per Espen Stoknes.
Labels: An Earthly Cosmology, animal behaviour, Arne Næss, Becoming animal, David Abram, eco-
phenomenology
Bibliographical reference:
51
Morten Tønnessen 2010. "Is a wolf wild as long as it does not know it is being thoroughly managed?"
Humanimalia - a journal of human/animal interface studies 2(1): 1-8.
Labels: Humanimalia, Is a wolf..., Norwegian wolf management, wolf conservation, wolf ecology
The anthology Sammensatte tekster: Barns tekstpraksis [Complex texts: Children's text practice] is
being published as we speak. I have assisted the editor and the contributors with proof-reading, by
composing index etc.
/
Here's a presentation at the page of the publishing house, here the table of contents. In the book my
assistance is credited on page 7, in the preface.
Langedrag has two enclosures with captive wolves - one socialized and another 'wild'. Unlike with
Polar Zoo, where I visited in March, at Langedrag visitors are taken into the confinement of the
shyest gang, not the most socialized one. The terms, however, appear to have another meaning than
in Polar Zoo, where the shy couple did not receive visits and would not have approached people like
they appear to do at Langedrag.
Abstract:
The topic of wildness is a matter of ongoing debate in the wildlife management community.
In this essay it is related to questions of shyness and actual human interference (especially on
the management side). The well-documented case of the Scandinavian wolf population
suggests that shyness is not a sufficient criterion for wildness. For all the wolf knows, it is still
a wild animal – and it still behaves like one. But are we justified in claiming that a (more or
less) free-ranging wolf is truly wild, simply because it does not know that it is being
thoroughly managed? The article introduces this theme and the case at hand, covering wolf
mortality, human artifacts in the life-world of wolves, and captures. The long-term goal of
wildlife conservation, the author proposes, should be to restore the independent viability of
wildlife. Wildness, in short, has to go beyond appearances. In a closing note, Arne Næss‘
philosophy of wolf policies is critically evaluated.
Labels: animal studies, Arne Næss, Depauw university, Humanimalia, Is a wolf..., knowing wolves,
knowledge, Norwegian wolf management, Scandinavian wolf management, wildness
Some hours ago I finished revising my article "Mapping human impact: Expanding horizons -
Interdisciplinary integration", cf. previous posts, for the forthcoming CECT II proceedings. In the
process I have added approximately 1.000 words (but removed 4 figures).
Outline:
Intro
Abstract:
At a general level, the recurring topic of this article is the opposition and complementarity of
qualitative and quantitative aspects of empirical data. In particular, an attempt is made to
develop means to qualify quantitative data. More particularly, however, the aim of the current
text is to investigate the extent of human impact in nature in contemporary times – or more
precisely to evaluate proposed representations thereof. The theoretical perspective stems from
ecosemiotics and biosemiotics, with special emphasis on a phenomenological reading of
Jakob von Uexküll.
The basic motion in this text is that from self to world. Exemplifying what the ontological
niche amounts to, the author provides ontological maps ranging from the social relations of
one individual to a rough sketch of the global ecological situation. In a concluding section the
general problem of interpreting numerical data qualitatively is approached by way of three
54
steps: (1) Determining existence status, (2) Determining the character of the relation and (3)
Translating numerical data to characterizing terms.
Labels: CECT, ecological footprint, global environmental data, mapping human impact, Ontological
map, Ontological niche, Umwelt, Umwelt mapping
Morten Tønnessen
The starting point for the author‘s terminology is the concept of an Umwelt transition, which
is in effect an Uexküllian notion of environmental change. An Umwelt transition can be
defined as a lasting, systematic change within the life cycle of a being, considered from an
ontogenetic (individual), phylogenetic (population-, species-) or cultural perspective, from
one typical appearance of its Umwelt (i.e., organism-specific phenomenal world) to another.
An Umwelt trajectory, the author proposes, can be characterized as the course through
evolutionary (and cultural) time taken by the Umwelt of a creature, as defined by its changing
relations with the Umwelten of other creatures. Thus defined it represents an evolutionary and
mass equivalent of Jakob von Uexküll‘s notion of the Umwelt-tunnel of a single individual
creature.
As we can see, the Umwelt trajectory of a creature is the historical path of its perceptual and
behavioral dispositions considered from an ecological and phenomenological point of view.
As such, it is intimately tied to this creature‘s ontological niche, i.e. the set of contrapuntal
relations that a being takes part in at a given point of natural history. Like the Umwelt tunnel
and the ontological niche, the Umwelt trajectory of a creature can be regarded as a
specification of the Umwelt concept which situates it in terms of temporal perspective.
Taken as a whole the Umwelten of wolves, sheep and people represent an Umwelt triad of
sorts, given that they have been and remain intertwined and codependent. This triple Umwelt
is telling of both ecological and cultural developments. In cultural terms, hardly any animals
are as loaded with symbolic value as the wolf and the sheep. And the shared importance is no
coincidence, as the symbolism of the two animals has developed in explicit opposition to each
other. Altogether the wolf-sheep duet, the human-sheep duet and the human-wolf duet – to
speak with Uexküll – constitute a highly coordinated triple duet in the great symphony of
nature.
The most enlivening aspect of this narrative concerns the semiotic and phenomenological
interplay that takes place amid wolves, sheep and people. While the most relevant long-term
process of change varies from creature to creature – evolution for wolves, breeding for sheep
and cultural development for people (all of which represent broad categories of Umwelt
transitions) – there are several common factors at play as well. In this paper, the author will
touch upon a) the geographical range and overlap, (b) the sensory range and overlap, and c)
the functional range and overlap of wolves, sheep and people. The most crucial arena for
semiotic interplay (and thus semiotic causation) is that of functional interrelations,
particularly with regard to companionship and enmity. In our current ecological situation,
where the human species has emerged as a global species in charge of an ecological empire
56
wherein the sheep, among other species, has been given a privileged position, even the wolf
has entered into a dependency relation with our kind. For better or worse, our Umwelt
trajectories have (once again) aligned.
Labels: evolution, semiotic causation, semiotic interplay, Umwelt terminology, Umwelt trajectory,
wolves and sheep, zoosemiotics, Zoosemiotics and Animal representations
:)
2. For a week or so, I pondered upon contributing to the third Center of Excellence in Cultural Theory
conference, which is due in late October, with a joint poster presentation on wolves. Prospective
cooperators were too busy, however.
:)
3. Tuesday 7th I met with my supervisor Kalevi Kull. We agreed on a time schedule for my thesis work
this last year of my PhD studies. A full thesis (monograph) is to be completed by April 1st, 2011, and
revised following comments by pre-reviewers by May 20th, at which point I'll formally apply for a
57
doctoral degree. The defense will take place approximately September 30th, 2011, at Tartu's
Department of Semiotics.
:)
4. The same day I met the Italian PhD student Davide Weible, who studies a topic not so different
from mine (phenomenology + biology).
:)
5. On Wednesday 8th I met briefly with the Estonian folklorist Merili Metsvahi, who specializes on
Estonian werewolves.
:)
6. An important task during this visit was to move our things from the apartment we have been
renting up until August 15th, in Kuu street. Me and my wife left the country with 66 kg of luggage,
after having sent 25 kg by post.
:)
7. Around the conclusion of the trip I arranged tickets for my next visit to Tartu, which will take place
November 23rd-30th.
Labels: Academic news in brief, CECT, doctoral defense, Estonia, Ilmar Rootsi, Tartu semiotics, thesis,
University of Tartu
Dinda L. Gorlée and Morten Tønnessen 2010. "Da Lotman og semiotikken kom til Norge".
Pp 258-259 in Turid Farbregd and Øyvind Rangøy (Eds.): Estland og Norge i fortid og nåtid -
Norsk-estisk forening 25 år. Oslo: Norsk-estisk forening.
The article includes a picture (in Dinda Gorlée's ownership) from Sebeok and Lotman's encounter in
Bergen in 1986.
Labels: Bergen 1986, Dinda L. Gorlée, Festschrift, Lotman, Norsk-estisk forening, Thomas Sebeok
Last Thursday I presented "The history of philosophy in 1-2-3" At Pecha Kucha Night Oslo, vol. 15, for
an audience of perhaps 400, as part of my commercial project Spør Filosofen (Ask The Philosopher -
which is also on Facebook).
Pecha Kucha is a format for very consice Powerpoint-style presentations - 20 slides are presented,
they shift automatically, and you only have 20 seconds to talk about each one (for more info, see
here).
I have uploaded some pictures from other presentations that same evening in my Norwegian blog
Utopisk Realisme, and am in the process of uploading a video of my own 6 min 40 sec performance
to Youtube.
Labels: Examen philosophicum, history of philosophy, Oslo, Pecha kucha, philosophy business,
philosophy-for-hire, SPØR FILOSOFEN
59
Conservation scientist Tormod V. Burkey has confirmed his participation. So has professor in biology
Dag Hessen, who will co-write a chapter with me on what is unique about humans and what we have
in common with other creatures. My further contributions will entail two chapters written solely by
me (one on carnivore wildness and the other on man as a global species) and two introductory
chapters co-written with my two fellow editors.
I am further a candidate for giving a lecture at the Pre-Conference Lecture event which will take
place in Sydney, February 19th 2011, in connection with the workshop on the history and philosophy
of ethology. For all these occasions, cf. the MAI webpage soon.
Labels: animal studies, Minding Animals, Minding Animals International, Oslo, Sydney, The Nordic
Animal Studies Network, Uppsala
Whereas:
1) Economic growth, as defined in standard economics textbooks, is an increase in the
production and consumption of goods and services, and;
2) Economic growth occurs when there is an increase in the multiplied product of population
and per capita consumption, and;
4) Economic growth is often and generally indicated by increasing real gross domestic
product (GDP) or real gross national product (GNP), and;
5) Economic growth has been a primary, perennial goal of many societies and most
governments, and;
6) Based upon established principles of physics and ecology, there is a limit to economic
growth, and;
7) There is increasing evidence that global economic growth is having negative effects on
long-term ecological and economic welfare…
2) There is a fundamental conflict between economic growth and the ecological services
underpinning the human economy (for example, pollination, decomposition, climate
regulation), and;
3) Technological progress has had many positive and negative ecological and economic
effects and may not be depended on to reconcile the conflict between economic growth and
long-term ecological and economic welfare, and;
61
5) A steady state economy (that is, an economy with a relatively stable, mildly fluctuating
product of population and per capita consumption) is a viable alternative to a growing
economy and has become a more appropriate goal in large, wealthy economies, and;
6) The long-run sustainability of a steady state economy requires its establishment at a size
small enough to avoid the breaching of reduced ecological and economic capacity during
expected or unexpected supply shocks such as droughts and energy shortages, and;
7) A steady state economy does not preclude economic development, a dynamic, qualitative
process in which different technologies may be employed and the relative prominence of
economic sectors may evolve, and;
8) Upon establishing a steady state economy, it would be advisable for wealthy nations to
assist other nations in moving from the goal of economic growth to the goal of a steady state
economy, beginning with those nations currently enjoying high levels of per capita
consumption, and;
9) For many nations with widespread poverty, increasing per capita consumption (or,
alternatively, more equitable distributions of wealth) remains an appropriate goal.
Humans are so accustomed to being the subjects of history that to many, it is provocative to claim
that animals too can be actors of history. Such attitudes are enthused by our age-old philosophical
dismissal of animals. A hundred years ago, nature writers William J. Long and Ernest Thompson Seton
caused controversy by claiming that their writings were accurate representations of natural history.
Their depiction of wolves sparked a debate about whether animals were individual creatures subject
to learning or instinct-driven specimen. Charges of anthropocentrism and anthropomorphism have
never silenced, and the relation between science and folklore remains troublesome.
/
The cultural baggage at play in the discourse about wolf policies is so overwhelming that even an
environmental historian can be excused for confusing the map with the territory. While in a strict
62
sense we cannot go beyond having cultural perceptions of the wolf, it does matter how we treat the
wolf in environmental history. Attributing agenthood to the wolf entails, for a start, to regard it as an
animal that acts. Naturally, there is a whole range of different actions (biologist Jakob von Uexküll
operated with seven categories). In many cases, wolves are decision makers. They make informed
choices (typically based on what Michael Polanyi calls tacit knowing).
/
Being an actor may not in itself qualify anyone as an actor of historical significance. But some
individuals stand out. To illustrate the function wolf agency can play in environmental history, I will
make use of three examples:
/
1 The beast of Gévaudan: Man-eating wolf(s) that caused havoc in 1764-1767 (disputed).
2 “Ivan”: An immigrant from the East that was shot illegally (contemporary Norway)
3 The Galven bitch: Unaware of management zones, this sheep-eating female was the first to be
relocated (contemporary Norway)
Below is an overview of the four papers now included in the panel (Dr. Frank Zelko will be the session
chair).
"Influencing military strategy, developing chemistry, changing politics: The role of the wolf in 1800-
century Sweden"
Labels: animal studies, conferences, environmental history, ESEH, Finland, Turku, Wolf history:
Agents in hiding, Wolves
Norsk-estisk forening (= Norra-Eesti Ühing), the Norwegian-Estonian association, has announced that
its Festschrift will be launched September 16th, at an event in Oslo. It has been named "Estland og
Norge i fortid og nåtid - Norsk-estisk forening 25 år" [Estonia and Norway in the past and today -
Norsk-estisk forening 25 years].
Cf. previous posts about my joint article "Da Lotman og semiotikken kom til Norge", co-written with
Dinda Gorlée.
Labels: Dinda L. Gorlée, Estonia, Lotman, Norra-Eesti Ühing, Norsk-estisk forening, Norway, semiotics
We are still discussing the work title, but have agreed on most other features. These days we start
inviting contributors (the collection - which will be in Norwegian - is invitation-only).
/
64
In the process we have developed a 1p invitation letter, a 2p book project description, and a highly
secret 3p 'innholdsdisposisjon' with drafts of contents.
Forholdet mellom mennesker og dyr er sentralt for forståelsen av såvel kultur som natur – og
ikke minst for forståelsen av vår tids eskalerende miljøkrise. Det er et tema som på grunn av
sine etiske dimensjoner er gjenstand for økende interesse og debatt – også i Norge, som i
denne sammenhengen har kommet ganske kort i den intellektuelle diskursen. Etiske spørsmål
i forlengelsen av menneskets bruk av natur og dyr har fått økt økt interesse de siste årene,
både innen ulike fag og i den offentlige debatt. Likevel er gjensidig avhengighet mellom
miljø, dyr og mennesker lite belyst. Arten mennesket og andre arter er ikke bare beslektet,
men er i dagens samfunn gjensidig avhengig av hverandre på en historisk unik måte. Mens det
på den ene siden er et trivielt faktum at mennesket bare kan overleve som del av en større
natur, har vi særlig de siste århundrene også gjort utallige dyrearter stadig mer avhengige av
oss. Det moderne mennesket har innarbeidet en instrumentell (nytteorientert) tilnærming til
andre dyr. Dyr utnyttes i dag på utallige måter: til mat, sko og klær, i underholdning, som
arbeidsdyr, forsøksdyr, kjæledyr og så videre. Først de siste par generasjonene har det i vår
kultur blitt vanlig å snakke om at dyr kan ha egenverdi uavhengig av nytteverdi. Dagens
offisielle politikk for vern av biologisk mangfold sliter med eldgamle forestillinger om et
nødvendig fiendskap mellom bonde-/menneskesamfunnet og utemmet natur. Så dypt sitter
dette natursynet at vernetilhengere og dyrevernere av mange automatisk slås i hardtkorn med
menneskefiender.
Riin Magnus, Nelly Mäekivi and Morten Tønnessen 2010. "Editors' foreword to the Special Issue
Semiotics of Nature". Hortus Semioticus 6 (SI on Semiotics of nature): 1-6 (incl. Estonian version,
"Toimetajate Eessõna").
Riin Magnus and Morten Tønnessen 2010. "The Bio-Translator - Interview with Professor in
Biosemiotics Kalevi Kull". Includes bibliography of Kalevi Kull’s biosemiotic publications. Hortus
Semioticus 6 (SI on Semiotics of nature): 77-103.
Dear readers,
We are delighted to announce that the journal Hortus Semioticus has now published a special issue
on the semiotics of nature. All together with 7 papers, a foreword, an interview, Meditationes
Semioticae and 2 overview articles, this issue is almost exclusively in English. The papers of
contributing MA and PhD students are all original papers written within a scientific framework which
encapsuls the topics of meaning, value, communication, signification, representation, and cognition
in and of nature.
1) Nelly Mäekivi, Riin Magnus and Morten Tønnessen: Editors foreword to the Special Issue Semiotics
of Nature
2) Remo Gramigna: Augustine’s legacy for the history of zoosemiotics
3) John Haglund and Johan Blomberg: The meaning-sharing network
4) Silver Rattasepp: The idea of the extended organism in the 20th century history of ideas
5) Sara Cannizzaro: On form, function and meaning: working out the foundations of biosemiotics
6) Svitlana Biedarieva: Reflections in the Umwelten
7) Arlene Tucker: A metaphor is a metaphor
8) Patrick Masius: What are elephants doing in a Nazi concentration camp? The meaning of nature in
the human catastrophe
9) Riin Magnus and Morten Tønnessen: The bio-translator. Interview with professor in biosemiotics
Kalevi Kull (with his complete biosemiotic bibliography)
10) Meditationes Semioticae – this time by Kaie Kotov: Do you mind? Does it matter? Semiotics as a
science of noosphere
11) Ülevaade: Acta Semiotica Estica VII
We hope that for our readers and contributors, these papers will encourage even more interest in
the field, and open yet new horizons.
The list of papers there (11) is not complete - but I have accepted whatever their system could find
on its own.
66
I have not listed any past talk, but have added the 4 upcoming talks I have scheduled as for now.
My CV is there, though, offering a more complete overview (but the latest updates appears here, in
Utopian Realism).
This was my first encounter with the World Phenomenology Institute, lead by Anna-Teresa
Tymieniecka. Registering for the conference, I became a member (by choice) of International Society
of Phenomenology and Sciences of Life, which seems, unfortunately, not to have much activities.
My paper will be revised by October 1st, and hopefully published in the conference proceedings,
which will appear as a volume of Analecta Husserliana.
In Bergen I further mingled with local phenomenologists, and joined the email list of a University of
Bergen phenomenology group.
Labels: Bergen, phenomenology, semiotics of being, Uexküllian phenomenology, World institute for
advanced phenomenological research
References
I am in the (slow) process of preparing a more detailed academic bibliography, including works
written by others that refer to my work. One of the latest references made is in Don Favareau's
"Introduction: An evolutionary history of biosemiotics" (from Essential reading in biosemiotics),
where I'm referred to (p55), though not included in the literature list.
Quote:
In the areas of animal studies, ethology and zoology, Mette Böll (2002), Karel Kleisner (2007,
2008), Dominique Lestel (2002), Timo Maran (2003), Dario Martinelli (2005), Stephen Pain
(2007), Morten Tønnessen (2003), and Aleksei Turovski (2000) are all pursuing biosemiotic
lines of investigation in their work.
Labels: A stroll around the worlds of zoosemioticians and other animals, book review, Semiotica,
zoosemiotics
Labels: Denmark, semiotics, signs, The cultural semiotic of wolves and sheep, wolves and sheep
Labels: people, sheep, Umwelt, Umwelt trajectory, Wolves, zoosemiotics, Zoosemiotics and Animal
representations
BIOSEMIOTIC WORKS
3. Jesper HOFFMEYER and Claus EMMECHE: Code-duality and the semiotics of nature (1991): 152
4. Marcello BARBIERI: The organic codes - an introduction to semantic biology (2003): 137
5. Claus EMMECHE and Jesper HOFFMEYER. From language to nature: The semiotic metaphor in
biology (1991): 95
8. Kalevi KULL: Biosemiotics in the twentieth century - a view from biology (1999): 67
9. Various: A semiotic perspective on the sciences: Steps toward a new paradigm (1984) 59
10. Kalevi KULL: Semiotic ecology: Different natures in the semiosphere: 57
11. Thomas SEBEOK: Coding in the evolution of signalling behavior (1962): 54
13. Thomas Sebeok and DJ UMIKER-SEBEOK (eds.): Biosemiotics: The semiotic web 1991 (1992): 53
RELATED WORKS
1. Claus EMMECHE: The garden in the machine - the emerging science of artificial life:
166+53
2. Claus EMMECHE, S. KØPPE and Frederik STJERNFELT: Explaining emergence -
towards an ontology of levels (1997): 144
3. Thomas SEBEOK: How animals communicate (1977): 140
4. Claus EMMECHE, Frederik STJERNFELT et al.: Levels, emergence, and three three
versions of downward causation (2000): 105
5. NA BAAS and Claus EMMECHE: On emergence and explanation (1997): 98
6. Thomas A. SEBEOK: The Clever Hans phenomenon: Communication with horses, whales,
apes, and people (1981): 93
69
7. TA SEBEOK and M DANESI: The forms of meaning - Modeling systems theory and
semiotic analisis (2000): 85
8. Thomas SEBEOK: Global semiotics (2001): 78
9. PB ANDEREN, Claus EMMECHE and NO Finnemann: Downwards causation: Minds,
bodies and matter (2000): 77
10. Thomas SEBEOK and DJ Umiker-SEBEOK: Speaking of apes: A critical anthology of
two-way communication with man (1980): 65
Morten Tønnessen‘s essay focuses on a substance even more ubiquitous than oil, one that has
perhaps also been more essential to the reproduction of our species: non-human animals.
Approaching analysis of human-affiliated life forms from the perspective of the long durée
and developing the concept of ecosemiotics, Tønnessen argues that the historical process of
globalisation can perhaps be best understood through analysis of the planet‘s colonisation not
simply by human beings but also by the accompanying proliferation of species we favour.
Alongside this process of planetary diffusion, human beings have introduced a schism in
nature, Tønnessen suggests, one that divides biological life into favoured and non-favoured
species. Life and death have been apportioned around the planet for centuries according to
this anthropocentric matrix of biological utility. The result is a global colonial organism or
ecological empire, with human beings at the apex of a massive pyramid of fauna and flora that
we privilege because of their utility to our species‘ expanded reproduction. While
acknowledging the primary role played by Europe and the United States in diffusing a
particularly unsustainable model of development around the world over the last five hundred
years, Tønnessen explores the provocative question of whether there may be something
ecologically imperialistic in our behaviour as a species over a much longer time span than that
of Euro-American-dominated modernity. Drawing unnerving conclusions from this historical
retrospect, Tønnessen argues that the serried ecological crises we currently confront are linked
inextricably to the forms of biopower we exercise not simply over human populations but
over the mammoth global pyramid of flesh and grain upon which we depend.
Other contributors: Crystal Bartolovich, George Caffentzis, Ashley Dawson, Ben Dibbley, Jeremy
Gilbert, Peter Hitchcock, Leerom Medovoi, Brett Neilsen, Rob Nixon, Sian Sullivan, Nicholas Thoburn,
Tony Venezia.
DocStoc $7.95
Labels: ecosemiotics, global species, Imperial Ecologies, New formations, political ecology, The Global
Species
The news fall in two categories - plenary speakers and publication venues. We are glad to announce
the plenary speakers of the conference [already mentioned in Utopian Realism]: Colin Allen
(Professor of History and Philosophy of Science at Indiana University, USA), Jesper Hoffmeyer
(Professor emeritus, Biological Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark), Graham Huggan
(Professor of Commonwealth and Postcolonial Literatures at University of Leeds, UK) and David
Rothenberg (Professor of Philosophy and Music at the New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA).
/
There are two publications planned for the articles based on conference presentations: a volume in
Rodopi´s Nature, Culture and Literature series and a special issue on zoosemiotics in journal
Semiotica. The Rodopi volume will be edited by me and Kadri Tüür, the Semiotica issue by Timo
Maran.
/
For up-to-date information, see the conference webpage.
Labels: CFP, Rodopi, Semiotica, Tartu conference, Tartu semiotics, zoosemiotics, Zoosemiotics and
Animal representations
71
Labels: Fædrelandsvennen, Norwegian wolf management, Southern wolf, wolves and sheep
2. The editorial work with the Special Issue of Hortus Semioticus 'Semiotics of Nature' is about to be
concluded - the issue is now entering production.
3. I have started writing my thesis (though that threshold qua point in time could be defined in
various ways).
4. The last week I have started planning the remaining field work and research stays of my case study
on Norwegian wolf management. First out is a trip to Langedrag mountain farm and wildlife park
(captive wolves) and Rendalen, Hedmark (sheep farms).
5. My debate article 'Forskningens formål' (The purpose of science) was printed in the Norwegian
national daily Aftenposten August 6th. Norwegian text here.
6. The same day I sent a chronicle entitled 'Ulven på Sørlandet' (The wolf in the South) to the regional
newspaper Fædrelandsvennen. This is my first comment to the wandering wolf that has been visiting
our region (where there have not been wolves since the mid-80ies, as far as I can remember) the last
few weeks, and the calls for its death.
7. Tomorrow I am heading for Bergen, where the 60th International Congress of Phenomenology is
taking place the next few days (cf. previous posts).
8. I have arranged tickets for my next visit to Estonia, which will take place September 5th-9th (5-8 in
Tartu, 8-9 in Tallinn).
***
Labels: Academic news in brief, captive wolves, Hortus semioticus, phenomenology, philosophy of
ethology, sheep, Sydney
The following thinkers have been treated the most in what I have read these 6 months (out of 218
thinkers logged):
10. Aristotle (2, 3), Heidegger (14, 7), Theodore Roosevelt (-)
As we see, scientist-come-philosopher Michael Polanyi (1891-1976) - who I first read last spring -
tops both lists, and I have also taken interest in his part-colleague Marjorie Grene (1910-2009), who's
#7 at the author list and #6 in the about-list. For totally unrelated top 10-lists, including 10 Truly
Awful Ways To Be Killed By An Animal, see Listverse.
1) Saturday - two days ago - I finished my quarterly report for the research project "The Cultural
Heritage of Environmental Spaces. A Comparative Analysis Between Estonia and Norway" (5pp).
2) In the process of this year's doctoral attestation review, I was informed that my doctoral school
should be the Estonian Graduate School of Culture Studies and Arts (GSCSA) (application submitted).
3) The interview with professor in biosemiotics Kalevi Kull (my supervisor), conducted by me and Riin
Magnus, has now been fully transcribed, and is in the process of being edited ("The bio-translator").
The final text will include a full biosemiotic bibliography, and replies to questions by Don Favareau,
Timo Maran and Paul Cobley.
4) A couple of weeks ago, on the 21st of June, I met in Oslo with green criminologists Ragnhild
Sollund and Guri Larsen to develop our planned anthology on human-animal and human-nature
relations. We have sketched the topics of around 18 chapters and discussed potential contributors.
Invitations to participate will likely be sent in August.
5) The 'opponent' (commentator) at my presentation on illegal wolf hunting in the seminar series
Kriminalpolitisk seminar (University of Oslo) in November will likely be professor of criminology
Kjersti Ericsson (1944-). Program for the series appears here.
6) Yesterday John Deely - who will this autumn publish Medieval Philosophy Redefined - agreed that
we will submit a book proposal (for softcover publication) involving the four first semioethics
interviews. I am very much looking forward to that enterprise.
7) Faithful to tradition, Marcello Barbieri has published photos from the 10th gathering in
biosemiotics, which took place in Braga, Portugal, a week ago.
8) Through my company, Spør Filosofen, I have been booked for a philosophical presentation of "The
future of the growth economy" at Aker Maritime Hydraulics (by the Aker MH philosophy and
literature group).
Previous posts:
Academic news in brief VIII
Academic news in brief VII
Academic news in brief VI
Academic news in brief V
Academic news in brief IV
75
Labels: Gatherings in biosemiotics, green criminology, John Deely, Kalevi Kull, philosophy business,
semioethics
Nova Publishers have now launched a site for the collection, which is edited by Steven C. Hamel, and
included in the "Languages and Linguistics" series. The book, which will cost no less than 129$, is
scheduled for publication in the 4th quarter of 2010. Below is Nova's book description and the table
of contents (any emphasis is mine).
Book Description:
Semiotics is the study of sign processes (semiosis), or signification and communication, signs
and symbols, and is usually divided into three branches: Semantics, Syntactics, and
Pragmatics. Semiotics is frequently seen as having important anthropological dimensions. In
general, semiotic theories take signs or sign systems as their object of study: the
communication of information in living organisms is covered in biosemiotics or
zoosemiosis. This book discusses the theory and application of semiotics across a broad
spectrum and has gathered current research from around the globe.
Table of Contents:
Preface
Beyond Signification: The Co-Evolution of Subject and Semiosis (Tahir Wood, University of
the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa)
Language, Emotion, and Health: A Semiotic Perspective on the Writing Cure (Louise
Sundararajan, Chulmin Kim, Martina Reynolds, Chris R. Brewin, Rochester Regional
Forensic Unit, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, and others)
Re-Thinking the Place of Semiotics in Psychology and its Implications for Psychological
76
How Israelis Represent the Problem of Violence in their Schools: A Case Study of a
Discursive Construction (Douglas J. Glick, Department of Anthropology, Binghamton
University, Binghamton, New York)
The Semioethics Interviews III: John Deely: Human Understanding in the Age of Global
Awareness (Morten Tønnessen, Department of Semiotics, Institute of Philosophy and
Semiotics, University of Tartu, Estonia, and others)
The Role of Sign Vehicles in Mediating Teachers‘ Mathematical Problem Solving (Sinikka
Kaartinen, Timo Latomaa, University of Oulu, Finland)
Multimodal Stylistics: The Happy Marriage of Stylistics and Semiotics (Nina Nørgaard,
Institute of Language and Communication, University of Southern Denmark)
Labels: John Deely, Nova Science Publishers, semioethics, Semiotics: Theory and applications
My talk ''We the living: The reception of Uexküll in Norwegian ecophilosophy" (focusing on Arne
NÆSS and Peter Wessel ZAPFFE) was given Friday 25th at 11-11.30, and was subject to questions
from Don FAVAREAU, Peter HARRIES-JONES and Jesper HOFFMEYER.
That same Friday I chaired the afternoon session (stepping in for Marcella FARIA, who was not
77
Labels: Arne Næss, Braga, Gatherings in biosemiotics, Jakob von Uexküll, Peter Wessel Zapffe,
Portugal
SCRIBD - IN ENGLISH
1. The Statistician's Guide to Utopia: The Future of Growth 1.089 (+646)
2. Steps to a Semiotics of Being (PPT) 567 (+416)
3. Utopian Realism 2009 474
4. Umwelt Transition: Uexküllian Phenomenology (research plan) 381
5. Semio (poster) 378 (+212)
6. Curriculum Vitae of Morten Tønnessen (1/5 2010) 333
7. Environmental problems in light of Gabriel Marcel's distinction problem/mystery 306
8. POSTER The Nature View Held by Environmentalists 280
9. ABSTRACT The Nature View Held by Environmentalists 253
10. Signs Grow, But Should They? Semioethics and the Dominant Semiosis of Homo Sapiens 218
11. Reversing the Brain Drain 191
12. The Nature View Held by Environmentalists (Attitudes in the Norwegian Environmental
Establishment) 163
13. 'Tell Me, Where is Morality Bred?' (The Semioethics Interviews I, John Deely) 140
SCRIBD - IN NORWEGIAN
1. Historieløst om klima 853 (+649)
2. Utopisk Realisme 2009 772
3. Om fluer og filosofi (intervju med Arne Næss) 673
4. Hvem har ansvaret for volden? 641 (+464)
5. Burlesk vitenskapsparodi 419
6. Tidsvitne - omslag 377
7. 20 års moratorium mot oljeleting 305
8. Preludium til romanen HUFF 295
9. Europa i overgangsalderen 238
10. Jakob von Uexküll og øyets verden 224
11. Svart Bok 1998 208
SCRIBD - IN ESTONIAN
1. Must naine Tartus 445 (+293)
25 Uploads
17 Subscribers
11,162 Reads
0 Readcasts
SemioPhenomenon 2.973
2. The 10th Gathering in Biosemiotics, to be arranged in Braga, Portugal June 22-27th, has some time
ago announced its program, where my talk is scheduled for presentation Friday June 25th at 9-9.30.
The abstract of "We The Living: The Reception of Uexküll in Norwegian Ecophilosophy" is to be found
at page 42 in the abstract book.
3. Since the last "Academic news in brief" was posted May 7th, I have conducted further Michael
Polanyi work papers, and thereby, as it turned out, concluded the course work in The philosophy of
Michael Polanyi. I have started reading Marjorie Grene, and expect to write a paper at some not too
distant point in time on Polanyi and Grene and their relevance for matters of biosemiotics (and vice-
versa).
4. Quite some time ago, I was told my first blurb ever was not included after all in Paul Cobley (ed.):
Realism for the 21st Century. A John Deely Reader, published October 2009.
5. Monday - two days ago - I wrote my Attestation Review report for my third year as a Ph.D. student
(progress review report), which includes a Revised plan for research and study for the academic year
2010/2011. 13 pp. The attestation review meeting takes place Thursday 17th of June, but I do not
have the chance to be there in person.
Labels: Academic news in brief, attestation review, Gatherings in biosemiotics, John Deely, Marjorie
Grene, Michael Polanyi, Norwegian ecophilosophy, Uexküll, We the living, zoosemiotics
While Umwelt ethics is referenced in the historically layered references - p. 148 - a quote is
represented on p. 107, and a further issue discussed pp. 108-109. The quote starts out the final
chapter of the book, 'The Ethical Entailment of Semiotic Animal, or the Need to Develop a
Semioethics'.
"Modern man" can indeed be said to have been "the animal that does not want to be an
animal" [1. Tønnessen 2003: 287], that did not admit to its animality (at least not in its
fullness, if at all), preferring [Nöth 2001: 283] "a Cartesian dualism between culture and
nature which has opposed humans to the rest of the natural world for centuries". Of course,
modern man to the end adhered to the illusion that "man" is a sufficiently comprehensive
linguistic expression to designate the human species of animal as a whole, male or female!
Pp. 108-109:
The modern treatment of ethics [...] that is to say, the ethical discourse to which we have
become accustomed, especially in the wake of the pathological "linguistic turn" within the
Analytic tradition - requires its own transformative assimilation to befit the postmodern
context. Nor is the point de depart for this assimilation of philosophy's past (not only
modernity! but the middle Latin and Greek ages as well) far to seek. It must surely be in the
development of Hoffmeyer's distinction, taken up by Tønnessen,[4] between "moral subject"
and "moral agent", which at once enables and requires the postmodern thinker to extend the
notion of a "right to moral consideration" on the part of moral agents beyond the realm of
human interactions within culture to include the larger biosphere presupposed to [the] very
existence and healthy development of (as Sebeok put it) "that miniscule segment of nature"
modern thought has tended to "grandly compartmentalize as culture."
4. Hoffmeyer 1993: 152-176, esp. 164-166 (= 151-153 in the 1995 reprint) "Biosemiotics and the
Question of Moral Subjects"; see further Tønnessen 2003, passim. Tønnessen's expressed
reservations concerning Hoffmeyer's foundation, however (2003: 284n2), speaks rather in
Hoffmeyer's favor than toward the narrower ethical purview that Tønnessen proposes. Both
Hoffmeyer and Tønnessen draw in this discussion from Jon Wetlesen 1993. The point seems to be
one coming into general recognition. Thus Arne Johan Vetlesen (1994: 3), announcing that he
restricts "discussion of 'morality' to what obtains - or fails to obtain - between human subjects", yet
81
asks the reader to "note that this does not imply that I hold only humans to have a moral standing".
In the semioethic view - that is, a view of ethics stringently derived from semiosis itself precisely as
involving the human - morality cannot be restricted only to what obtains or not between human
subjects, but concerns also the actions and impact of human subjects upon the environment itself,
both physical, biological, social, and cultural.
Labels: Arne Johan Vetlesen, Jesper Hoffmeyer, John Deely, Jon Wetlesen, semioethics, Thomas
Sebeok, Umwelt, Umwelt ethics
My paper "The legality and ethical legitimacy of wolf hunting in Scandinavia" was presented
yesterday at 11.30-12 in a group session, with an audience of 20-25 people (almost half of all
attendents). It was well received - though the paper presented before and after sparked more
debate, due to their defense, vs. critique, of 'green criminology'/'eco-global criminology' as such.
Encountering green criminology for the first time, it strikes med how similar it is to other fields of
'green' this or that. It is really interesting to recognize ethical stands, rhetorical figures etc (here:
'crime' - if not 'justice' - applied in a metaphorical sense) that I am already well familiar with. From a
critical point of view, I see there are statements made in green criminology that are based more in
political stands than in academic analysis. Solid norms for such analysis, and for how crossdisciplinary
findings can be integrated, would be of great value.
All papers presented at the research seminar - mine included - will be published in form of an online
report at some point following submittance in mid-June.
I have made several contacts - among them criminologists Ragnhild Sollund (editor of Global harms:
Ecological crime and speciesism) and Guri Larsen. Stepping out of the bus taking us back to Oslo, we
agreed that the three of us will co-edit a Norwegian language anthology on speciesism and related
issues.
Oh! I should also mention that yesterday, during the festive, 4-hour dinner, the three of us took part
in a remake of Little Red Riding Hood - with me figuring as the wolf, Guri as the grandmother ("Eat
me, I'm a green criminologist" Eat me, eat me, please!") and Ragnhild as Little Red Riding Hood ("Are
you still hungry? Would you like to eat some more people? There's a kindergarten down the street,
and a senior home in the neighbourhood...").
Labels: Anthology, editing, green criminology, Little Red Riding Hood, Nordic Council for Criminology,
speciesism
2. Yesterday I finally finished reworking and rewriting my article 'I, wolf: The ecology of existence',
with revisions prompted by the critique of David Abram and others. To appear in an anthology this
year.
3. My paper 'The legality and ethical legitimacy of wolf hunting in Scandinavia' has been
scheduled for presentation in group 1 (one out of three in 'green criminology'), at 12.30,
Tuesday May 11th at the 52nd research seminar of the Scandinavian Reseach Council for
Criminology.
4. Two days ago, Wednesday May 5th, I went back and forth to Oslo in one day, and spent a
couple of hours researching at the National Library (Nasjonalbiblioteket) in the process,
logged in through their license for using LovData, a Norwegian database of laws and
regulations.
6. One of the readings is philosophical and will take place in a fair trade-shop in Kristiansand,
as part of the event Kulturnatta. My theme: 'Frigjøring' [liberation] - May 8th happens to be
both the day of liberation (WW2) and the international fair trade-day.
7. Meanwhile, we, the guest editors of Hortos Semioticus' special issue Semiotics of Nature,
have been receiving full-length papers from contributors.
92
Labels: Academic news in brief, David Abram, Fædrelandsvennen, green criminology, interview,
liberation, Michael Polanyi, Phil Mullins
There's a 1p free preview for all - the full article is available after login only.
Contents
Umwelt Terminology
Another article from the special issue that is now online is Wendy Wheeler's Delectable creatures
and the fundamental reality of metaphor: Biosemiotics and animal mind.
phenomenology' - 20pp. Like the other papers, it will be considered for publication in Analecta
Husserliana.
Contents
Uexküllian phenomenology
I have agreed to continue as a member of the steering group this autumn. We'll have to find new
student representatives from the fresh one-year philosophy students come September.
Next week we'll have a steering group meeting. Following that, we'll conduct a report on the
activities of this semester.
94
Agents in hiding
I am in the process of contributing, as part of a proposed panel on animal agency, with an abstract to
the 6th conference of the European Society for Environmental History (ESEH), to be arranged in
Turku, Finland, June/July 2011. The title of my abstract is "Wolf history: Agents in hiding".
Labels: agency, animal agency, animal studies, environmental history, wolf ecology
Wolf criminology
My abstract "The legality and ethical legitimacy of wolf hunting in Scandinavia" has been accepted
for presentation at the 52nd research seminar of the Scandinavian Research Council for Criminology
(SCRfC), to be arranged at Hønefoss, Norway, May 10-12.
Labels: CV
Abstract
Wolf land is in the context of the present article to be considered as an ambiguous term
95
referring to ―the land of the wolf‖ from the wolf‘s perspective as well as from a human
perspective. I start out by presenting the general circumstances of the Scandinavian wolf
population, then turn to the Norwegian wolf controversy in particular. The latter half of the
article consists of an elucidation of current wolf ecology related to what is here termed wolf
land, and a concluding comment to the now controversial notion of wilderness. The final
section of this article further includes identification of changing factors in current
Scandinavian wolf ecology in terms of its semiotic niche, and ontological niche, respectively.
The following articles have also been published online (print version is due in December):
Labels: Biosemiotics, Kalevi Kull, Merleau-Ponty, Norway, Norwegian wolf management, Semiotics of
perception, special issue, Wolf land, wolf management
.
The article is accessible in full-length for subscribers only.
Abstract
This special issue on the semiotics of perception originates from two workshops arranged in
Tartu, Estonia, in February 2009. We are located at the junction of nature and culture, and of
semiotics and phenomenology. Can they be reconciled? More particularly, can subfields such
as biosemiotics and ecophenomenology be mutually enriching? The authors of the current
special issue believe that they can. Semiotic study of life and the living can emerge as
properly informed only if it is capable of incorporating observations made in natural science,
96
philosophy and cultural studies. The semiotic study of nature entails an experiential turn in the
study of life processes. Perception is—or should be—at the heart of the life sciences.
CONTENTS
Introduction
Conclusion
Labels: applied semiotics, John Deely, Nova Science Publishers, semioethics, The semioethics
interviews
This house believes that GDP growth is a poor measure of improving living standards.
Dear Sir,
for me it is impossible to answer the posted question with a simple 'yes' or 'no', because two matters
appear to be confused at the very root of the debate:
a) whether or not GDP measures (there are various measures) are precise indicators of 'living
standards'
b) whether or not growing GDP is a desirable political aim (for already wealthy nations)
It might very well be that the answer to a) is in the main yes, but the answer to b) no (if so, there is
an optimal level of GDP, and GDP is not to be maximized, but optimalized).
This possibility, however, presupposes that the debate's term 'living standards' is highly ambiguous,
and a poor choice of terms. Which it is. In market terms, GDP measures are quantitative measures
(even though they do refer to the 'demand' of economic stakeholders with means). The 'living
standard' Oswald has in mind appears to be of a qualitative nature.
The Norwegian philosopher Arne Næss distinguished systematically between 'standard of living' (a
quantitative measure of wealth) and 'quality of life'. If such a distinction had been introduced in the
polled question, I would have been able to take a stand. As it stands, a 'yes' would imply conceptual
ignorance, and a 'no' ethical ignorance.
Posted by Morten Tønnessen at 03:50 0 comments
Labels: Arne Næss, GDP, ignorance, living standard, quality of life, standard of living, The Economist,
wealth, welfare, wellbeing
Labels: animal studies, email lists, Nordic HAS, The Nordic Animal Studies Netwwork
Humanimalia has confirmed that they will publish my article. I am adding the part on Næss in
response to a suggestion from their external reviewer - who liked the questions the article poses. He
hopes it will spur debate.
Labels: Arne Næss, Humanimalia, wildlife conservation, wolf management, wolf policies
This presentation will partake in the session May 11th, ―Globalisering i kriminologien og
økologisk kriminologi‖.
First, I will briefly examine laws and rules regulating wolves in Norway and Sweden since
―Lov om Utryddelse af Rovdyr og Fredning af andet Vildt‖ (Law on Extinction of Carnivores
and Protection of other Wildlife) was enforced in Norway in 1845. This section will include
comparisons of Norwegian and Swedish management regulations. In Norway, wolves have
had the status of a protected species since 1972, but conservation policies remain
controversial – and are regularly sabotaged by means of illegal hunting. The same goes for
Sweden, which in January orchestrated the first legal wolf hunt for more than a generation.
Second, I will discuss the ethical legitimacy of legal and illegal wolf hunting respectively.
How do they compare, in terms of what is justifiable in light of sustainable development etc.?
The centrality of this question is evidenced by the fact that a majority of Scandinavian wolves
today die in the encounter with a bullet. Even though the motivation of the various shooters
99
varies greatly, the outcome for the wolf is systematically similar. Unlike illegal hunting, legal
hunts have the sanction of the law. From a pragmatic standpoint, however, the attempts to
negotiate agreement with opponents of conservation policies by allowing or conducting wolf
hunts do not seem to have much effect on the level of illegal hunting. Rather than working so
as to combat illegal hunting, one could claim that current management strategies rather
legitimize wolf hunting as a phenomenon in general.
Labels: criminology, ethical legitimacy, extinction, illegal hunting, law, legal hunting, legality,
protected species, wolf conservation, wolf hunting, wolf management
1) Thursday April 1st the deadline for submitting abstracts to the special issue of Hortus Semioticus
"Semiotics of nature" expired. All in all we received 3 English language abstracts. We expect to see
them all materialize.
-
2) Friday April 2nd I presented the 30m PP "Territory vs. confinement: The Umwelten of free-range
vs. captive wolves" at a 6 hour Research seminar in zoosemiotics and animal representations.
-
3) During the seminar, I agreed with Silver RATTASEPP and Nelly MÄEKIVI to include the latter
(possibly as a replacement of the former) in the planned co-work with Estonian wolf ethologist Ilmar
ROOTSI. An initial meeting has yet to take place - perhaps in June.
4) After the seminar, researchers of the project Dynamical zoosemiotics and animal representations
had a meeting (at Vilde) where we first of all made plans for the April 2011 conference Zoosemiotics
and animal representations. I agreed to co-edit the proceedings (expected spring 2012) with Timo
MARAN, which we aim to get published in book form by an international publisher. The proceedings
will envelop selected conference contributions only.
5) Monday April 5th I guest-lectured in Riin MAGNUS' English language MA course in ecosemiotics.
The topic was "More-than-human needs: The needs of the living". We discussed two papers:
- Arne NÆSS & Ivar MYSTERUD: "Philosophy of wolf policies (I): General principles and prelimenary
exploration of selected norms"
- Alf HORNBORG: "Vital signs: An ecosemiotic perspective on the human ecology of Amazonia"
-
6) After the seminar I discussed the topic of animal play during lunch with MA student Arlene
100
7) I then met with Riin MAGNUS to prepare our Hortus Semioticus interview with Kalevi KULL.
8) Tuesday April 6th I met 2 hours with visiting professor Walter GULICK for consultation. I am a
student in his course "The philosophy of Michael POLANYI". Polyani seems quite useful for my thesis
work etc.
9) After reading another chapter in GULICK's forthcoming POLANYI reader - which we use as course
material - I went to class (generally I take this course as a reading course. A term paper will have to
be conducted in May).
10) A while after the course, I returned to Department of semiotics to conduct the interview on
biosemiotics with Kalevi KULL, together with Riin MAGNUS. 1hr50min of recordings.
11) Finally, in Tallinn, Wednesday April 7th, I met with Allan GROMOV in Keskkonnaministeerium, the
Estonian Ministry of the Environment, to discuss possible cooperation on climate issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------
You'll find the first five "Academic news in brief" postings here.
Labels: Academic news in brief, Arne Næss, climate change, Kalevi Kull, Michael Polanyi, Tartu, the
Tartu school of biosemiotics, wolf ecology, zoosemiotics
MAI aims to promote integration/development of contact between researchers in the field of animal
studies on one hand and advocacy groups promoting environmentalism, animal rigths etc. on the
other. Importantly, their vision is to support attempts to integrate the environmental movement and
animal rights groups - though MAI's work is in the main theoretical/scholarly. A crucial task!
You'll find their Objectives & Principles here. Except for a few bizarre ideas, such as the topic of
"Animals and the Queer Communities" (no offence to either party), it's all good.
101
Labels: animal rights, animal studies, environmentalism, Minding Animals, Minding Animals
International
The international conference Zoosemiotics and Animal Representations, to be arranged in Tartu April
2011, has launched its official homepage.
ResearcherID profile
I have registered with a profile at ResearcherID (here). ID: B-1482-2010.
Since I am not at any of my institutions, I have not yet been able to add publications.
Description:
With background from philosophy, I currently work mostly within the framework of
semiotics, in the tradition of biologist Jakob von Uexküll (1864-1944). My main topic is
human-nature relations. Consequently everything from conservation issues and philosophy of
science via cultural representation of animals and economic growth to future studies is of
interest to me. Reworking ontology is our greatest challenge.
I have been on his email list for a year or so now. You can join it here.
It is now likely to appear in the general conference proceedings of the second CECT (Centre of
Excellence in Cultural Theory) autumn conference, which as far as I understand is also materializing -
though its precise format will only be decided upon in a month or so.
Labels: CECT, ecological footprint, Geografiska annaler, mapping human impact, Umwelt mapping
Abstract
The phenomenon of colonialism is in this article treated with reference to our stepwise
establishment throughout history of something akin to a global colonial organism. The
concept of ‗global species‘, which is introduced for the first time, applies not only to the
human species but furthermore to several of our affiliated species. Due to disparity in
ecological and climatic conditions, global presence may never before have been a typical
characteristic of dominating species – but it is today. Humankind‘s successful proliferation
and dispersal has facilitated the global spread of everything from livestock and crop species to
pets and certain bugs, at the expense of wildlife. Though humankind is in this article for the
most part taken to be one entity, the author does in no way claim that all cultures are the same,
or that we are destined to go on in the same way as we have started out. The word ―we‖,
however, is empathised – as a prerequisite for a truly global awareness and sense of
responsibility. What this article suggests, is simply that the global colonial organism we have
established is the proper real-life framework for any discussion of the ecological performance
of specific cultures and societies.
Keywords
Biosemiotics, Capitalism, Crop species, Global colonial organism, Global culture, Global
species, Globalisation, Land use, Livestock, Pets
Labels: abstract, global colonial organism, globalisation, keywords, New formations, The Global
Species
104
2. The editing of "Semiotics of Perception", the forthcoming special issue of Biosemiotics, is moving
into its very last stages - currently being sent to typesetting. Production next.
3. At the same day as I am giving a talk at Hald International Centre, Hald - May 26th (cf. yesterday's
Academic news in brief) - they will sceen the crowd-funded, fictional-documentary climate movie The
Age of Stupid. Recommendable, for the most part (I saw it a few days ago, in preparation of this
event).
Labels: Age of stupid, Filosofisk forum, filosofiske samtaler, Hald, Kristiansand, philosophical
consultations, Semiotics of perception, town hall meeting
Academic news in brief IV: Group dialogue, networking, and two talks
[Written yesterday]
1. This morning, I was on the radio for 7 minutes (Radio Sør, Kristiansand) talking about this evening's
townhall meeting, "Philosophical consultations on faith" [Filosofisk samtale om tro] - cf. former plans
made and reported. I will supplement Håvard Løkke in the role as "samtaleleder" (facilitator for the
group conversation). Four persons will introduce us to their personal view on faith: Akmal
Ali/Noureddine Ramila (muslim), Paul Leer-Salvesen (christian) and the philosophers Ralph Henk
Vaags (christian) and Stein Rafoss ("humanist").
3. Last week I agreed to give a 2 hour English language talk on the environment and human dignity at
Hald International Centre (Mandal, Southern Norway) May 26th. The audience will consist of a
"class" of volunteers (14 nationalities, I think) that will by then have spent the last 7 months
practicing aid and relief.
4. Last week I further committed to giving a 45 minute talk April 5th at the University of Tartu, in an
English language ecosemiotics course at master level, led by my collegue Riin Magnus. The topic: The
needs of humans and other living creatures... and the possibility of coexistence.
105
Labels: Act now, aid, Biosemiotics, coexistence, ecosemiotics, Hald, Kristiansand, Mandal, needs,
relief, Tartu, University of Agder, University of Tartu
Program
Here.
Labels: animal play, bear cubs, play fight, Polar Zoo, Salt and Pepper
Biosemiotics
I am now included in the online overview of the editorial board of the Springer journal Biosemiotics.
Bear pics
The bear cubs Salt and Pepper of Polar Zoo in Northern Norway were officially let out of the den for
the winter this Saturday (2 days ago) (picture in local newspaper, with red ball, here). A few days
earlier, when I happened to be present, they tried it out, off the record, to see how the bears would
respond. Here's a few pictures of the two leaving the artificial den, and play fighting in the snow.
107
108
Now the 4 page brochure in which it appears - about Ph.D. degree studies, and short-term research
visits - is also online. The nationality of the three other Ph.D. students featuring with testemonials is
Romanian, Latvian and Chinese, respectively.
Labels: brochure, degree programmes, English, Ph.D. studies, PhD studies, research visit, Tartu
semiotics, Tartu Ülikool, Testemonial, University of Tartu
Labels: Biosemiotics, deep ecology, environmental philosophy, Gatherings in biosemiotics, Jakob von
Uexküll, Norwegian ecophilosophy, Peter Wessel Zapffe, reception, Umwelt theory
Wolves wrestle
Wolf play
Labels: animal behaviour, animal videos, captive wolves, Polar Zoo, wolf, wolf ecology, Wolves
111
The socialized wolves at Polar Zoo simultaneously carry out their roles vis-à-vis their human
caretakers (and visitors to the zoo) and their social roles vis-à-vis each other (this is due to the fact
that the zookeepers remain neutral, in stead of taking "a role in the pack"). Accordingly, they can
fight one moment and lick a caretaker's face the next, then returning to the fight...
112
113
Labels: aggression, captive wolves, fight, hierarchy, Luna, Nayla, Polar Zoo, Steinulv, wolf, wolf
ecology, wolf violence, Ylva
Wolf kisses
These pictures are of a zookeeper and a long-term visiting animal trainer - but one of the socialized
wolves, Ylva, "kissed" me as well. The wolves got used to licking people on/in their mouths as pups,
when the zookeepers at times fed them from their mouths.
Labels: captive wolves, kiss, kisses, Polar Zoo, wolf, wolf ecology, Wolves
117
Here we're inside of the enclosure of the shy canid couple, Nanok (he) and Gaida (she). The box
contains animal feed (meat). The adult wolves of the park get in average 2,5 kg each day (Note: they
are not fed every day).
The shy couple kept a distance as long as we were inside. In the neighbouring enclosure, that of the
four socialized wolves, they also kept a distance as we were up in the "wooden tower" (or rather
ladder) from which these wolves are fed.
118
Nanok and Gaida eat. Correction: Nanok, the male (to the right), eats - and shows his teeth to his
beloved Gaida, to signal that she cannot yet approach the food.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the road/path, the socialiced wolves keep track of what's going on,
with us and to some extent also with their parents Nanok and Gaida...
Posted by Morten Tønnessen at 09:06 0 comments
Labels: captive wolves, Polar Zoo, wolf, wolf ecology, wolf imagery, Wolves
119
Feeding the lynx: Before entering an enclosure, the zoo keeper has to go through security measures
with you. Before entering the lynx enclosure, I was told that they are unpredictable, and "precision
hunters". If attacking to kill they would go for my throat. I tried to think of a cat 10 times a cat's size
... which didn't help easing my fear of these Nordic forest cats. On the other hand, they do not
commonly attack humans in the wild, and these particular animals are well fed at that.
There's three lynx in Polar Zoo. This female appears to be the most curious/courageous of them. She
tried to get to eat straight from the zoo keeper's box with meat, and hissed at him when he wouldn't
let her. To the left: A piece of animal feed (meat).
120
The same female lynx was not afraid of getting close to us - but run off when the zoo keeper pointed
the spade at her.
Feeding the musc oxes: Ester (left) came to eat first, Klaus (right) was more wary of us.
Two times he faked an attack at us - first by leaping ahead and stamping with his front feet, and then,
after a few minutes, by "running towards us" - for 1 meter. It did the trick for me - I felt scared
121
(although I was well aware that these were only early warning signals). I wouldn't want to run into
this fellow unprotected on a plain.
Labels: animal studies, captive animals, lynx, musc ox, Polar Zoo, zoo animals
This poor wolf escaped from soon-to-be-established Polar Zoo in 1993, only to end up, in its afterlife,
as a trophy in the zoo's café.
Wolf pics 1
This is not a wolf. The head looks like a wolverine - but the body more like a fat fox...
My first picture of the socialized wolves in Polar Zoo. I am inside of the enclosure.
Wolf videos
124
Here's five videos I have recorded today, during my research visit to Polar Zoo:
Labels: animal play, captive wolves, howling, human howling, play fight, Polar Zoo, wolf, wolf
ecology, Wolves
/
125
Polar Zoo has kept wolves since its start in 1994. There's currently 6 wolves here - 4 of them
socialized (the alpha male - their father, and one of the two shy wolves - is 10 years old, and was
born in the zoo). I will meet them all tomorrow (and until Thursday). Plus the brown bear cubs Salt
(female) and Pepper (male).
This afternoon I have been talking with the staff (3 permanently here (of which I have met 2), and an
additional 2 visiting at the moment). Bear trainers and the like. A lot of information to digest.
Tomorrow I'm flying North, to Polar Zoo, to spend three days there.
Labels: Dynamical zoosemiotics and animal representations, Umwelt, wolf ecology, zoosemiotics
The aim of the symposium is to bring together motivated researchers and high level keynote
speakers with an interest in interdisciplinary systemic approaches to complex issues under the theme
of closed-loop sustainable material systems.
At this event, we'll apply the methodology of "philosophical consultations". Before the general, open
dialogue, four representatives will talk about their personal faith, or lack thereof (a Christian
professor of ethics, a Christian philosopher, a Muslim imam, and a non-believing philosopher).
Labels: Agder University, faith, Filosofisk forum, filosofiske samtaler, Kristiansand, philosophical
consultations, UiA
Contents:
From Self to World
The Value of Nature
Umwelt Terminology
Concluding Remarks on Umwelt Mapping
127
Contents:
The Case of the Scandinavian Wolves
The Scandinavian Wolf Wars
The Land
Wilderness - Idea or Reality?
Borth articles are for the forthcoming special issue of Biosemiotics "Semiotics of Perception".
Structure:
Home
History
Websites
Gatherings (lists of participants)
Books (1985-2009) - with no mention of Sebeok's zoosemiotic books
Journal
Society
All in all the exchange included 79 emails (January 14th - February 6th). These include:
128
I have a few comments/questions to your text (though I have little or nothing to contribute
with concerning a general discussion about biolinguistics). First, though, I would like to ask
where it will be published (as I would like to quote it in one of my articles-in-process).
2) You claim that "animals do not interpret the world but only representations of the world.
Any interpretation, in short, is always exercised on internal models of the environment, never
on the environment itself". Sure, perception of "external reality" is always mediated.
Nevertheless, "the environment" (in an objective sense) necessarily represents the
final/ultimate object of any perception. The percepts are never identical to their final objects -
but why stress that they are (fundamentally) different from them? That is trivially true. But
related they are. Not even man can take in "reality" unmediated.
3) I find your explanations of how natural selection favors icons and indexes rewarding and
interesting - but when you ask: "Why were animals unable to go beyond icons and indexes?
Why didn‘t they learn to use symbols?" I think you neglect some empirical evidence to the
contrary.
4) I also found interesting your observation that in "all other mammals the wiring of the brain
takes place almost completely in the dark and protected environment of the uterus, whereas in
our species it takes place predominantly outside the uterus, where the body is exposed to the
lights, the sounds and the smells of a constantly changing environment." This is clearly a key
point.
morten tønnessen
http://utopianrealism.blogspot.com/
The first point, on our understanding of interpretation, was a recurring topic in the whole discussion.
The third point I made, concerning the use of symbols among animals, made Marcello revise his
article on this point, from a claim that animals do not make use of symbols to the much more correct
claim that no animal make systematic use of symbols in any way comparable to man (cf. post 5,
M.B.).
Dear Marcello,
I have followed this discussion throughout, and realized how frustrating it must have been for
you to see how few actually addressed the (new) substance of your article. That was a shame.
Hopefully the ideas concerning the origin of language herein will be analysed in much more
detail (from both sides of the fence) after your article has been published.
Best,
Morten
In addition, Marcello's reply to me (post 4) was referred to in posts 3 (Stanley Salthe), 40 and 48
(M.B.).
Selected articles:
Otto Lehto: Studying the cognitive states of animals: Epistemology, ethology and ethics
Karel Kleisner, Marco Stella: Monsters we met, monsters we made: On the parallel emergence of
phenotypic similarity under domestication
A list of all published articles 1998-2006 (including two by me) rests here.
Labels: animal play, animal studies, cat play, Sign Systems Studies, zoosemiotics
PolarZoo, which claims to be "the world's Northernmost zoological park", is one of three (public)
places in Norway with captive wolves. At PolarZoo some of them are so tame that they have physical
contact with caretakers and some guests.
Later this year I will also visit Langedrag Naturpark, plus revisit Kristiansand zoo.
Remarkably, my visit to PolarZoo in March will actually be my first visit ever to Northern Norway! By
car, it's 1.785 km from where I am currently sitting making these plans (I will go by plane from Oslo to
Bardufoss, an hour's drive away).
Hortus Semioticus is an online academic journal of semiotics - the study of signs and sign processes.
In Tartu, Estonia, where the student journal is based, nature has long accompanied culture as a topic
for semiotic inquiry (cf. the fields known as biosemiotics, ecosemiotics, and zoosemiotics). The
driving force behind the journal is curiosity and the joy of inquiry.
/
Around the summer of 2010 the journal will publish a special issue on the semiotics of nature
(meaning living nature, rather than physical nature). We are inviting papers on the topics of meaning,
value, communication, signification, representation, and cognition in and of nature (ranging from the
cellular level to the global scene). We encourage originality within a scientific framework which
emphazises the semiotic aspects of the life processes alluded to above. Not least, we strongly
welcome submissions from other fields (besides, beyond or beneath semiotics). Graduate students
and young scholars are particularly encouraged to submit.
/
Contributions (5-20 pages) should be written in English or Estonian and sent to the guest editors by
May 1st, 2010. Prior to that we're expecting an abstract (100-200 words) plus 3-5 keywords by April 1
2010. Please find further instructions attached.
/
Please submit your proposal to the guest editors: riin.magnus@gmail.com (Riin Magnus),
nellymaekivi@gmail.com (Nelly Mäekivi) and mortentoennessen@gmail.com (Morten Tønnessen)
Labels: Biosemiotics, call for papers, ecosemiotics, Hortus semioticus, semiotics of nature, special
issue, zoosemiotics
132
The second last night I further finished my article "Mapping human impact - Expanding horizons:
Interdisciplinary integration" (17pp) where, for one thing, I criticise the ecological footprint concept.
The article will partake in proceedings from the second CECT autumn conference, and is in part based
on my presentation there. Proceedings will likely appear in Geografiska annalar, published by the
Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography.
Contents:
Labels: CECT, ecological economics, ecological footprint, Geografiska annaler, global map, mapping
human impact, Ontological map, Ontological niche, spatiality
Philosophical consultation
Today in Filosofisk Forum the topic was philosophical consultations (filosofiske samtaler). Here's a
collection of relevant papers, about the methodologies in question. While today a group
conversation w/facilitator-method was applied, a session on March 2nd will feature me in the role as
a facilitator critically questioning fellow philosopher Håvard Løkke (there's also sessions February
16th and not least (a public one, out of are university-wise) March 16th).
133
The session is entitled 'To filosofiske samtaler (hardcore)' [Two philosophical consultations
(hardcore)]. I will see whether I can get inspired beforehand by the work of enfant terrible Oscar
Brenifier.
Labels: Filosofisk forum, filosofiske samtaler, Oscar Brenifier, philosophical consultations, UiA
Although many Society members are involved in social activism or communitarianism, the
purpose of the Society itself is to study utopianism rather than to pursue utopian projects. The
Society sponsors an annual scholarly meeting and publishes the journal Utopian Studies and a
newsletter, Utopus Discovered, which contains information about upcoming conferences and
workshops, and details on publications in the field.
No Bodily phenomenology
My abstract "Intercorporality and relational being: Nature considered as an intercorporal body (the
body of all bodies)" has been rejected by the organizers of the conference Bodily phenomenology.
A couple of things
Here during my current visit in Tartu, I have met with my supervisor (today), with Timo Maran
(heading the research project "Dynamical zoosemiotics and animal representations", for which I do
zoosemiotic research), and with Riin Magnus and Nelly Mäekivi, with whom I am guest-editing a
special issue of Hortus Semioticus (both yesterday).
Of the outcome: Preliminary plans about the date of the first in a series of regular workshops on
dynamical zoosemiotics and animal representations, and a soon-to-be distributed call for papers for
our special issue on the semiotics of nature, aimed at graduate students and young scholars in
particular.
Labels: Biosemiotics, Hortus semioticus, semiotics of nature, Tartu, the Tartu school of biosemiotics,
University of Tartu, zoosemiotics
Lotman/Semiotics of technology
What you find below was posted by me last week in the community SemioComm on LiveJournal.
I have just read "Technological progress as a problem in the study of culture" (Lotman 1988
[Russian], tr. to English 1991). A very rich text, dealing not least with various technologies of language
(writing, printing etc.). Early on, Lotman attacks Thomas Kuhn's view that "[o]utside the laboratory
everyday affairs usually continue as before" whenever scientific revolutions occur (quoted p. 781 of
Lotman's article). Here, Lotman portrays himself in contrast with Kuhn - though Kuhn is in other
contexts known exactly for emphasizing not only the the social workings of science, but also the way
in which scientific intuition and common cultural intuition interact - think only of his analysis of the
transition from a heliocentric to a geocentric world view (I don't know how much Lotman read of
Kuhn?). At that instant, Kuhn defended the view that it was somewhat rational of the scholars of the
day not immediately to adopt the new, revolutionary ideas - because they actually for quite some
time contradicted common and accepted knowledge, as well as the everyday intuitions of the day.
As Lotman stresses, the cultural impact of scientific revolutions oftentimes takes time to materialize.
"There is a repeated pattern to the immediate consequences of a technological change: having
acquired new powerful means, society first attempts to use them for old ends", he writes (p. 782-3),
135
"increasing its possibilities only quantitatively". Lotman's examples of ancient bureaucracies are
amusing. His simple observation that the invention of writing made much more advanced
architecture and infrastructure administrable is intruiging. In consequence, we can theorize (with
Lotman) that the advent of writing also made empires possible. Statehood, then, is from this
theoretical perspective a (actual, materialized, factual (though not necessary)) consequence of the
written word.
Similarly prolific are Lotman's observations regarding elements in the emergence of capitalism. The
technology of printing - enabling mass publication - is a central example, which further points to the
modern phenomena of mass hysteria, mass mentality etc (as well as, as Lotman notes, expressions of
individualism and eruptions of creativity). The individual and the mass - the individual as
representative of the mass - the individual in opposition to the mass (thereby reaffirming the
centrality of the mass, nevertheless)... Limitless optimism which can any given moment turn into its
opposite, bottomless pessimism...
And I ask myself: This global (or US?) culture of fear and hysteria ... After 9/11 in particular, perhaps
... how is it related to our most recent advances in mass communication? How is language changing
today, in cultural terms? This, I realize, is not a new debate... Perhaps the swine flu "pandemia"
would represent a good case study. Have we been infected by modern language?
Labels: applied semiotics, Kuhn, language, Lotman, mass hysteria, mass media, modernity, scientific
revolutions, statehood, technology
In this project, we are going to study the changes in general semiotics that are resulted from
the development of biosemiotic concepts and biosemiotic theory. One of our points of
departure will be the general semiotic theory as presented in "A theory of semiotics" by
Umberto Eco (which is until now one of the very few existing treaties in the general theory of
semiotics), and also some of Eco's later work that has developed the general theory. We will
also consider the theoretical work of Juri Lotman (and in some extent of Floyd Merrell, John
Deely and Paul Bains). The concepts we are going to study from the point of view of general
semiotics will include umwelt, organic code, organic relation, inheritance system, organic
need, functional cycle. The biosemiotic work to be analysed will include the models presented
in the works of Jesper Hoffmeyer, Howard Pattee, Marcello Barbieri, and Terrence Deacon.
The results will be published as review articles and case study analyses in the international top
periodicals of semiotics.
Labels: Biosemiotics, Estonian Science Foundation, Kalevi Kull, research project, the Tartu school of
biosemiotics, Umberto Eco, University of Tartu
in Braga, Portugal
Arne Naess (1913-2009) and Peter Wessel Zapffe (1899-1990) are two out of three
classics within Norwegian ecophilosophy, which has been acclaimed for its influence on
'radical environmentalism' internationally (cf. Peter Reed & David Rothenborg (eds.),
Wisdom In The Open Air: The Norwegian Roots of Deep Ecology, University Of Minnesota
Press 1992). Both Naess and Zapffe introduced fundamental disciplinary concepts (e.g.
'biosophy' by Zapffe, 'ecosophy' and the distinction between the deep and the shallow
ecological movement (thus 'deep ecology') by Naess). And they both based part of their
philosophies on Uexküll's work – though Uexküll was admittedly much more central to
Zapffe than he was to Naess, for whom Uexküll mattered first of all in the development
of his early (pre-environmentalist) philosophy. For a start, we can say that while Naess in
the main neglected the experiential and interpretative aspects of Umwelt theory, Zapffe
added pessimism to the mixture.
1) that there is a "brotherhood of suffering" ranging "from the amobea to the dictator",
and
137
2) that humans are unique in having several additional "interest fronts"; not only
biological interests but further social, autotelic, and metaphysical interests.
Despite the fact that Uexküll was first of all, in the context of Naess' work, influential at
an early stage (and was read by Naess in a slightly simplistic manner), we see here how
Zapffe's reading of Uexküll is informing also when we are considering the thoughts Naess
was later to develop on the topic of self-development through identification with others.
In Zapffe's case, Uexküll's Umwelt theory constitutes a central ingredient in his lifework
as such. In order to understand the paradoxical tension between the
sympathy/identification with animals on one hand and the explicit anthropocentrism in
Zapffe's ethics (where the human experience of wilderness ranks higher than anything
else) on the other, we have to start by understanding the biological outlook on which he
build his existentialist ecophilosophy.
International conference
Zoosemiotics and Animal Representations
Tartu, Estonia. 4–8 April 2011.
The conference “Zoosemiotics and Animal Representations” has an international advisory board. All
presentation abstracts will be peer-reviewed. The conference is organized by the Department of
Semiotics at the University of Tartu under the auspices of the Centre of Excellence in Cultural Theory
(CECT, EU/Estonia), and is supported by the Estonian Science Foundation (ETF/ESF).
Conference timeline
First call for papers: March 2010.
Deadline for abstracts: 15 September 2010.
The conference “Zoosemiotics and Animal Representations”: 4–8 April, 2011.
Deadline for conference publications: September 2011.
Contacts
E-mail: zoosemiotics@semiootika.ee
Postal address: The conference “Zoosemiotics and Animal Representations”, Department of
Semiotics, University of Tartu, Tiigi 78, Tartu 50410, Estonia.
Organizing team: Timo Maran, Jelena Grigorjeva, Morten Tønnessen, Kadri Tüür, Silver Rattasepp,
Nelly Mäekivi.
Labels: 2011, animal studies, applied semiotics, Biosemiotics, conferences, Department of semiotics,
University of Tartu
15 people were there, pretty much as expected - and the discussion following my talk was lively and
engaged enough.
Inclusion in the programme is dependent on the delivery of a full-length paper by May 1st.
All submitted papers are copy-righted for the first option of publication by the Springer journal
Analecta Husserliana.
Testemonial online
My testemonial for the University of Tartu is now online (under the headline "Degree programmes
taught in English - University of Tartu").
Yesterday I was in a meeting with the event bureau Kjentfolk in Oslo, and agreed to start working
with them.
I have been asked by the International Relations Office of University of Tartu to appear in a
information brochure aiming at recruiting international students (will also be published online).
Below is the testemonial I have submitted.
It was the legacy of Jakob von Uexküll (1864-1944) that brought me to Estonia, and the Tartu school
of biosemiotics. My first visit took place in 2000 - the welcoming kindness of my hosts inspired me to
return for conferences and eventually Ph.D. studies. Today I am involved in three research projects in
Estonia, and I am happy to be part of a thriving and open intellectual environment.
Labels: applied semiotics, international students, Testemonial, the Tartu school of biosemiotics,
University of Tartu
Myrdene Anderson, Argyris Arnellos, Stefan Artmann, Søren Brier, Luis Emilio Bruni, Paul
Cobley, Stephen J. Cowley, Fatima Cvrcková, Charbel Niño El-Hani, Marcella Faria, Almo
141
Farina, Mario Gimona, Peter Harries-Jones, Alexander V. Kravchenko, Dario Martinelli, Yair
Neuman, Stephen Philip Pain, Susan Petrilli, Joanna Raczaszek-Leonardi, Luis Mateus
Rocha, Stanley N. Salthe, Frederik Stjernfelt, Morten Tønnessen, Tommi Vehkavaara, Bruce
H. Weber and Günther Witzany.
In addition, there's 4 associate editors ( Donald Favareau, Jesper Hoffmeyer, Kalevi Kull, Anton
Markoš) and an Advisory board wherein sits (15 people, namely) Prisca S. Augustyn, Gérard Battail,
Peter A. Cariani, Han-liang Chang, Sergei V. Chebanov, Marcel Danesi, Terrence Deacon, John Deely,
Claus Emmeche, Cliff A. Joslyn, Koichiro Matsuno, Winfried Nöth, Howard Hunt Pattee, Alexei Sharov
and Jean Umiker-Sebeok.
MORTEN TØNNESSEN
INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY AND SEMIOTICS, UNIVERSITY OF TARTU, ESTONIA
The body and the world are obviously related. Not only is the body the immediate centre of the
physical world for any given perceiving (and acting) subject. Not only is any perception of ‘the world’
necessarily mediated by the body (organism) of the perceiver. We can further observe that the living
world (nature) is in actual fact constituted intercorporally, in other words by the numerous relations
that exist between the countless bodies about which we have come to learn.
For me, as a biosemiotician, embodiment is perhaps the most central general topic possible.
Consciousness is but the top of the iceberg – mind, in the elemental sense of awareness of
something, is everywhere in nature, since every living being is capable of, and dependent on,
interpreting, understanding and acting upon its relevant surroundings. Mind, then, is more-than-
human, even more-than-animal, and embodied mind must in its most general sense be taken to
signify the embodiment not necessarily of an anthropoid, more or less articulate consciousness, but
of a highly diverse repertoire of oftentimes diffuse awarenesses.
142
This is nature. An intercorporal body – a global web of bodies attuned to each other and routinely in
conflict with each other – the body of bodies. This is nature – where body relates to body, as partner,
as predator, as prey – a world built on bodies all partaking in relational being, a kind of existence
wherein the particular beings (you, me, Muki) are constituted in and by their relationships with
others.
In the course of this talk, I will allude to elements of the philosophy of embodiment in the work of
Jakob von Uexküll, David Abram, Gabriel Marcel and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. My broader project is
that of contributing to the development of an Uexküllian phenomenology worthy of the designation
semiotics of being.
Labels: body, conferences, David Abram, embodiment, Gabriel Marcel, intercorporality, Merleau-
Ponty, phenomenology, relational being, semiotics of being, Sweden, Uexküll, Uexküllian
phenomenology
The publication is likely to appear either late this year or early in 2011.
I have submitted an abstract entitled “The Semioethics Interviews III: John Deely: Human
Understanding in the Age of Global Awareness” to Nova Science Publishers' planned anthology
Semiotics: Theory and Applications, upon invitation.
The first interview in this series was published in Hortus Semioticus. The second and fourth are still to
find their places of publication (interested, anyone?).
Labels: applied semiotics, Hortus semioticus, John Deely, Nova Science Publishers, semioethics, The
semioethics interviews
143
In the process I am updating my info at the Estonian Research Information System (ETIS).
Posted by Morten Tønnessen at 05:51 0 comments
A chapter from Becoming Animal, "The discourse of the birds" (which I can testify is good reading),
will appear in the special issue of the journal Biosemiotics "The semiotics of perception", that very
same month.
Posted by Morten Tønnessen at 06:08 3 comments
Labels: An Earthly Cosmology, Becoming animal, Biosemiotics, David Abram, release date
Academic reports
The last week I have completed two academic reports (and began on a third, having a fourth
scheduled):
1. General report of the 4rth quarter for the research project "The cultural heritage of environmental
spaces" (3pp)
2. Status report for the special issue of "Biosemiotics" Semiotics of Perception, due August 2010 (6pp)
As for the latter, Silver Rattasepp and John Deely have cancelled their contributions, while Ane
Faugstad Aarø (UiB/Hermes text) is now on board.
Labels: Biosemiotics, cultural heritage, environmental space, Reports, research project, Semiotics of
perception, special issue
144
Economist profiles
Now in place:
EconPapers
MPRA
Labels: economic crisis, economics, exponential growth, future studies, growth, limits to growth