Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Why most people are lost and searching, disillusioned and desperate for solutions.
Valerie Coyle: The Western world seems inundated with so many different spiritual choices
and teachers, and most people seem to be shopping around in the spiritual supermarket and
changing aisles all the time. It seems very hard to stay focused on a spiritual path, even if it
feels like a true one.
Dadi Janki: Human beings are attracted towards spirituality at present because they are
tired of materialistic life. They have not experienced any happiness through materialism.
The more they have chased after materialism, to that extent they have lost themselves;
they have forgotten themselves. Their attention has become completely extroverted. It has
not been turned within. To search for spirituality means to go within. Because there are so
many paths of spirituality, from both the East and the West, people are totally confused
about what is right and what is wrong, or what they should select.
This world itself is a world of deception. When people have experienced deception they seek
a spiritual path. However, even when they come onto a spiritual path, after some time, they
again experience some kind of deception. This is why people move away from religion. They
are tired of hearing the word ‘religion’. Their pure feelings of faith in religion have
disappeared—whether that be Hindu, Muslim, Christian or whatever. No matter which
religion they belong to they have to understand what true spirituality is and go into the
depth of that spirituality.
Originally, the religious founders definitely had spiritual power. They lived as messengers of
god. They came on this earth whenever there was a need, and played their role within the
help of God’s power. Now, because people have become body conscious, they have
forgotten their religion, and they have so much conflict within themselves that, even if they
use the term ‘religion’, it is only namesake. Hence they do not practise the teachings that
were shared by those religious founders; they simply repeat them like parrots. No matter
how much they study, inside they are empty; they do not have that spiritual knowledge. In
order to experience peace, happiness and power it is necessary to go within, for only then
can we realize what true spirituality is. No matter how much someone searches outside,
they can never find true spirituality.
Dadi Janki: Spirituality means that I should be connected with the Source. For that I need to
have the recognition of that Source. Who is He? Where does He reside? In fact God is One.
He cannot be different for different religions. He is One for all. If I say that Christ belongs to
the Christian religion and someone else to another religion, then I create conflict. Instead of
more spiritual power there will be even more wars and even less love between one another.
Spirituality means to have eternal spiritual love for each other whilst maintaining that
incognito, internal connection with God. This is only possible when I become introverted, and
when I am able to keep my mind under control through the power of concentration. Today,
human beings’ minds and sense organs are not under their control. The sense organs cause
us to perform very bad actions by coming under the influence of lust, greed and anger.
Spirituality means to make my mind free from all these things—to let these desires finish.
The consciousness, “I want this, I want that etc,” is also extrovert. The more I want the less
satisfaction I will receive from that. In fact I will become even more of a beggar. To be
spiritual means to be royal, not to have any desires. A jeweller who does business with
jewels will not waste his time in trifling matters. So, I have to go deep into myself and search
for the treasures that I have within myself. In order to see God, I need to have a divine
intellect and divine sight. I cannot see God through these ordinary eyes. I can see this world
through these eyes, but I cannot see myself. Whether my eyes are open or not, I should be
able to see myself. Otherwise, if I am extroverted, whatever I see externally comes into my
mind. Even things I have seen years ago come into my mind.
Spirituality means to open the eye of the mind and, on the basis of that, to realize who I am.
When anyone comes here we always teach them three main lessons: “Who am I?” “Who is
God?” and “What is the philosophy of karma?” I should understand the philosophy of karma
to such an extent that every action I perform is accurate and filled with spirituality. Even if
the actions are mundane, they should reveal spirituality. Even the quality of my thinking
must be filled with spirituality because the foundation of human life is the quality of our
thoughts. If I have the feeling of positivity and of bringing benefit to others, then
automatically my thoughts will be filled with those qualities. And if my thoughts are of
quality, then my interactions with others will also be of quality. I am a soul; I am connected
with the Supreme Soul; He is teaching me, and whatever He is teaching me I am able to
share with others.
Valerie Coyle: Most spiritual teachings do advise us to go within, because the answers are
within. But it seems to me that to do this properly requires an enormous leap of faith. To
renounce the outer world and especially the ego creates a lot of insecurity. How do you
develop the faith to remain introverted? It seems to be a hard thing for people to grasp—
having such uncompromising faith—even in yourself?
Dadi Janki: Originally, there was spirituality within every one of us, but today we have
accumulated a lot of rubbish in the form of negative thinking and bad habits. And so,
spirituality means to clear away the rubbish and release the power that is in the soul. If you
ask the experience of those who are following a spiritual path now, they will be to verify this
experience of clearing away the rubbish to expose the beauty within. This does not mean
‘blind’ faith; you have to use your intellect. First understand, then have faith and then
practice.
Suppose I am explaining something to you. If you are intellectual, you will start to analyse
what I am saying through your intellect. Then nothing I explain will sit in your intellect. In
fact what you need to do is put aside all the other information that you have accumulated,
make your intellect quiet, and then you will be able to absorb. You can have faith only when
you can understand what you have heard.
Valerie Coyle: Personally, I feel that a lot of the times I sit on the fence. On one side is faith
and trust, and on the other is ego and control. The obstacle for me is the underlying fear
that if that I don’t at least attempt to control my world, nothing will happen to me. Maybe I
won’t even exist!
Dadi Janki: Firstly, I would like to clarify what it means to have trust. You don’t have to
trust me to have trust. You don’t have to trust me or what I say. You trust in something after
making yourself understand. If your intellect agrees with it, then you trust. We don’t use the
method used by gurus and others that you have to follow what we say. God has given us
this understanding. Previously you had the intellect but you did not know how to use it in
order to understand and judge what is right and what is wrong. Now, you received that
understanding to judge properly.
The difference between animals and human beings is that animals do not have an intellect.
Human beings have an intellect, so can ask, “What is right?” “What is wrong?” “What is
good?” and “What is bad?” “What is sin?” and “What is charity?” However, we have lost the
power of decision-making because the intellect has become so weak. We continue to
commit sins (negative and violent actions) and we do not perform any acts of charity.
Through understanding, we receive the ability to discern the difference between right and
wrong.
Previously, we used to suppress our conscience because we were under the influence of
other people, opinions and the world. Now our conscience opens up, and we develop the
power to perform good actions. If for example, I know what is right, but don’t have the
strength to do it, then I connect the yoga of my intellect with the Source and take the power
from God, and then I can do it.
First of all, I have to understand who I am and what my relationship with God is. Then, I
practically establish that relationship, and receive power. On the basis of this experience, I
have the faith that this is God and this is soul. At that point, I understand what I should be
doing. Then all my thoughts and actions will be accurate, and I will thank God for giving me
such good thoughts. This is what is called ‘having faith’.
For example, if I am born a Hindu, and I believe in all the teachings of Hinduism, then I
continue to move forward. Now, suppose somebody else speaks to me about another
religion or culture. I will not start thinking that I can’t leave my Hinduism behind because I
can’t survive without it. I will just incorporate the new information. It is the same with
education. When you study, you learn more and more new things. And, when you learn
something better, then automatically you will leave behind whatever is past. You will not
have questions, “How can I survive without it?” “How can I give up that teacher?” or “How
can I leave those books?”
If I have no ego, I can survive without these because I know that I am receiving something
better that is for my own progress.
Dadi Janki: Fear, Ego comes because of fear. We have been taking support from it for a
long time. Many people have this obstacle. If I give up what I was doing before, if I have any
loss, then what? God has given us an open opportunity to learn. He says you learn until the
last breath of your life. Myself, I had gurus before starting to practise Raja Yoga. They used
to frighten me by saying, “If you leave me something will happen” because they wanted me
to be their follower. I would answer, “Thank you for all you have taught me, but please now
give me blessings so that I can move forward in my life”. But I needed courage to do that.
Because there is no end to spirituality, the more you go into its depth, the further you can
go. And to that extent, you experience happiness.
Valerie Coyle: I think that most people have ego as their guru. It is the ego that tells most
of us what to do.
Dadi Janki: Because ego has filled the soul over a long period of time, it has gone deep
inside. Ego of my own body, my religion, my education, my culture, my nationality has gone
deep inside me. So, now I have to bring that ego out of myself. I have to become free from
ego. Then I am able to experience what reality is. The soul cannot do anything without a
body. But what has happened is that being in the body, we have allowed all the bodily things
to affect us: culture, religion, education, etc. In reality, the soul is truth, love and bliss. We
have to cleanse the soul in order to finish the ego. Because of ego, we also have greed,
anger, jealousy and attachment. If someone is jealous he can never make his mind peaceful
no matter how much meditation he does. Meditation means to remove all the rubbish and
cleanse the soul. No matter how much people may criticize or insult me, I don’t have to be
affected by that. I have to adopt truth and I have to move along that path. I know that God is
truth, but now I have to experience and realise how God is truth.
Dadi Janki is the Additional Administrative Head of the Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual
University. Valerie Coyle was editor of Southern Crossings Magazine published in Australia.
"Dr. Stephen R. Covey - one of the world's leading management consultants and author
of the best selling book The Seven Habits Of Highly Effective People - is co-chairman of
Franklin Covey located in Salt Lake City, Utah in the U.S.A. Franklin Covey provides
consultancy services to Fortune 500 companies as well as thousand of small and mid-size
companies, educational institutions, government and other organisations world-wide.
Their work in Principle Centered Leadership is considered to be an instrumental
foundation to the effectiveness of quality, leadership, service, team building,
organisational alignment and other strategic corporate initiatives.
Mahatma Gandhi said that seven things will destroy us. Notice that all of them have to do
with social and political conditions. Note also that the antidote of each of these "deadly
sins" is an explicit external standard or something that is based on natural principles and
laws, not on social values.
This refers to the practice of getting something for nothing - manipulating markets and
assets so you don't have to work or produce added value, just manipulate people and
things. Today there are professions built around making wealth without working, making
much money without paying taxes, benefiting from free government programs without
carrying a fair share of the financial burdens, and enjoying all the perks of citizenship of
country and membership of corporation without assuming any of the risk or
responsibility.
How many of the fraudulent schemes that went on in the 1980s, often called the decade
of greed, were basically get-rich-quick schemes or speculations promising practitioners,
"You don't even have to work for it"? That is why I would be very concerned if one of my
children went into speculative enterprises or if they learned how to make a lot of money
fast without having to pay the price by adding value on a day-to-day basis.
Some network marketing and pyramidal organizations worry me because many people
get rich quick by building a structure under them that feeds them without work. They are
rationalized to the hilt; nevertheless the overwhelming emotional motive is often greed:
"You can get rich without much work. You may have to work initially, but soon you can
have wealth without work." New social mores and norms are cultivated that cause
distortions in their judgement.
Justice and judgement are inevitably inseparable, suggesting that to the degree you
move away from the laws of nature, your judgement will be adversely affected. You get
distorted notions. You start telling rational lies to explain why things work or why they
don't. You move away from the law of "the farm" into social / political environments.
The chief query of the immature, greedy, selfish, and sensuous has always been, "What's
in it for me? Will this please me? Will it ease me?" Lately many people seem to want
these pleasures without conscience or sense of responsibility, even abandoning or utterly
neglecting spouses and children in the name of doing their thing. But independence is
not the most mature state of being - it's only a middle position on the way to
interdependence, the most advanced and mature state. To learn to give and take, to live
selflessly, to be sensitive, to be considerate, is our challenge. Otherwise there is no
sense of social responsibility or accountability in our pleasurable activities.
The ultimate costs of pleasures without conscience are high as measured in terms of time
and money, in terms of reputation and in terms of wounding the hearts and minds of
other people who are adversely affected by those who just want to indulge and gratify
themselves in the short term. It's dangerous to be pulled or lulled away from natural law
without conscience. Conscience is essentially the repository of timeless truths and
principles - the internal monitor of natural law.
A prominent, widely published psychologist worked to align people with their moral
conscience in what was called "integrity therapy." He once told me that he was a manic-
depressive. "I knew I was getting suicidal," he said. "Therefore, I committed myself to a
mental institution. I tried to work out of it, neutralize it, until I reached the point where I
could leave the hospital. I don't do clinical work now because it is too stressful. I mostly
do research. And through my own struggle, I discovered that integrity therapy was the
only way to go. I gave up my mistress, confessed to my wife, and had peace for the first
time in my life. ""
Pleasure without conscience is one of the key temptations for today's executives.
Sometimes on airplanes I'll scan the magazines directed at executives, noting the
advertisements. Many of these ads, perhaps two-thirds of them, invite executives to
indulge themselves without conscience because they "deserve it" or have "earned it" or
"want it," and why not "give in" and "let it all hang out"? The seductive message is,
"You've arrived. You are now a law unto yourself. You don't need a conscience to govern
you anymore." And in some ads you see sixty-year-old men with attractive thirty-year
old women, the "significant others" who accompany some executives to conventions.
Whatever happened to spouses? What happened to the social mores that make cheating
on spouses illegitimate behaviour?
As dangerous as a little knowledge is, even more dangerous is much knowledge without
a strong, principled character. Purely intellectual development without commensurate
internal character development makes as much sense as putting a high-powered sports
car in the hands of a teenager who is high on drugs. Yet all too often in the academic
world, that's exactly what we do by not focusing on the character development of young
people.
One of the reasons I'm excited about taking the Seven Habits into the schools is that it is
character education. Some people don't like character education because, they say,
"that's your value system." But you can get a common set of values that everyone
agrees on. It is not that difficult to decide, for example, that kindness, fairness, dignity,
contribution, and integrity are worth keeping. No one will fight you on those. So let's
start with values that are unarguable and infuse them in our education system and in our
corporate training and development programs. Let's achieve a better balance between
the development of character and intellect.
The people who are transforming education today are doing it by building consensus
around a common set of principles, values, and priorities and debunking the high degree
of specialization, departmentalization, and partisan politics.
In his book Moral Sentiment, which preceded Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith explained
how foundational to the success of our systems is the moral foundation : how we treat
each other, the spirit of benevolence, of service, of contribution. If we ignore the moral
foundation and allow economic systems to operate without moral foundation and without
continued education, we will soon create an amoral, if not immoral, society and business.
Economic and political systems are ultimately based on a moral foundation.
To Adam Smith, every business transaction is a moral challenge to see that both parties
come out fairly. Fairness and benevolence in business are the underpinnings of the free
enterprise system called capitalism. Our economic system comes out of a constitutional
democracy where minority rights are to be attended to as well. The spirit of the Golden
Rule or of win-win is a spirit of morality, of mutual benefit, of fairness for all concerned.
Paraphrasing one of the mottos of the Rotary Club, "Is it fair and does it serve the
interests of all the stakeholders?" That's just a moral sense of stewardship toward all of
the stakeholders.
I like that Smith says every economic transaction. People get in trouble when they say
that most of their economic transactions are moral. That means there is something going
on that is covert, hidden, secret. People keep a hidden agenda, a secret life, and they
justify and rationalize their activities. They tell themselves rational lies so they don't
have to adhere to natural laws. If you can get enough rationalization in a society, you
can have social mores or political wills that are totally divorced from natural laws and
principles.
I once met a man who for five years served as the "ethics director" for a major
aerospace company. He finally resigned the post in protest and considered leaving the
company, even though he would lose a big salary and benefit package. He said that the
executive team had their own separate set of business ethics and that they were deep
into rationalization and justification. Wealth and power were big on their agendas, and
they made no excuse for it anymore. They were divorced from reality even inside their
own organization. They talked about serving the customer while absolutely mugging their
own employees.
If science becomes all technique and technology, it quickly degenerates into man against
humanity. Technologies come from the paradigms of science. And if there's very little
understanding of the higher human purposes that the technology is striving to serve, we
becomes victims of our own technocracy. We see otherwise highly educated people
climbing the scientific ladder of success, even though it's often missing the rung called
humanity and leaning against the wrong wall.
The majority of the scientists who ever lived or living today, and they have brought
about a scientific and technological explosion in the world. But if all they do is
superimpose technology on the same old problems, nothing basic changes. We may see
an evolution, an occasional "revolution" in science, but without humanity we see precious
little real human advancement. All the old inequities and injustices are still with us.
About the only thing that hasn't evolved are these natural laws and principles - the true
north on the compass. Science and technology have changed the face of most everything
else. But the fundamental things still apply, as time goes by.
Without sacrifice we may become active in a church but remain inactive in its gospel. In
other words, we go for the social facade of religion and the piety of religious practices.
There is no real walking with people or going the second mile or trying to deal with our
social problems that may eventually undo our economic system. It takes sacrifice to
serve the needs of other people - the sacrifice of our own pride and prejudice, among
other things.
If a church or religion is seen as just another hierarchical system, its members won't
have a sense of service or inner workship. Instead they will be into outward observances
and all the visible accoutrements of religion. But they are neither God-centered nor
principle-centered.
The principles of three of the Seven Habits pertain to how we deal with other people,
how we serve them, how we sacrifice for them, how we contribute. Habits 4, 5 and 6 -
win-win interdependency, empathy, and synergy - require tremendous sacrifice. I've
come to believe that they require a broken heart and a contrite spirit - and that, for
some, is the ultimate sacrifice. For example, I once observed a marriage where there
were frequent arguments. One thought came to me : "These two people must have a
broken heart and a contrite spirit toward each other or this union will never last." You
can't have a oneness, a unity, without humility. Pride and selfishness will destroy the
union between man and god, between man and woman, between man and man,
between self and self.
The great servant leaders have that humility, the hallmark of inner religion. I know a few
CEOs who are humble servant leaders - who sacrifice their pride and share their power -
and I can say that their influence both inside and outside their companies is multiplied
because of it. Sadly, many people want "religion," or at least the appearance of it,
without any sacrifice. They want more spirituality but would never miss a meal in
meaningful fasting or do one act of anonymous service to achieve it.
If there is no principle, there is no true north, nothing you can depend upon. The focus
on the personality ethic is the instant creation of an image that sells well in the social
and economic marketplace.
You see politicians spending millions of dollars to create an image, even though it's
superficial, lacking substance, in order to get votes and gain office. And when it works, it
leads to a political system operating independently of the natural laws that should govern
- - that are built into the Declaration of Independence : "We hold these Truths to be self-
evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of
Happiness . . . . "
Figuratively, inside many corporations with lofty mission statements, many people are
being mugged in broad daylight in front of witnesses. Or they are being robbed of self-
esteem, money, or position without due process. And if there is no social will behind the
principles of due process, and if you can't get due process, you have to go to the jury of
your peers and engage in counterculture sabotage.
In the movie The Ten Commandments, Moses says to the pharaoh, "We are to be
governed by God's law, not by you." In effect he's saying, "We will not be governed by a
person unless that person embodies the law." In the best societies and organizations,
natural laws and principles govern - that's the Constitution - and even the top people
must bow to the principle. No one is above it.
The Seven Habits will help you avoid these Seven Deadly Sins.
And if you don't buy into the Seven Habits, try the Ten Commandments.
To some, these principles and the ideals they represent are readily attributable to
notable leaders of distinction such as Mahatma Gandhi, but they are harder to find in the
much more common experiences of everyday living. In response to this concern, Gandhi
replied, "I claim to be no more than an average man with less than average ability. I am
not a visionary. I claim to be a practical idealist. Nor can I claim any special merit for
what I have been able to achieve with laborious research. I have not the shadow of a
doubt that any man or woman can achieve what I have, if he or she would make the
same effort and cultivate the same hope and faith.
Gandhi emphasized : "A person cannot do right in one department whilst attempting to
do wrong in another department. Life is one indivisible whole. "
Shareholders' Rights:
The Gandhian Approach to Corporate Governance
Mario J. Gabelli, CFA - Class of '67
September 1999
At Gabelli Funds, Inc., our magna carta states, "We are neither for nor against management. We
are for shareholders." Our main purpose is to help our shareholders' money grow. Our clients do
not hire us to fight with corporate managements. We try to generate a 10 percent real return on
shareholders' money.
So, how do we get the attention of companies that we think are not doing a great job for
shareholders? We take what we describe as a Gandhian approach to corporate governance. This is
a form of forceful yet passive resistance that includes such methods as getting the press involved.
For example, about three years ago, after we had acquired 10 percent of Santa Anita Companies,
management threw up what we considered a Berlin Wall around shareholder values. The
company agreed to sell to Colony Capital (where a Santa Anita director was CEO) a sizable block
of stock at about $15 per share - about $15 per share less than what we calculated was the
underlying value. It was an insider deal that, in our view, was not consistent with shareholder
democracy.
So, what did we do? We notified the press. (We got the idea from the Pilgrims of the 17th
century, who would put you in the stocks when you committed a crime to serve your appropriate
tour of duty and expose you to public ridicule.) When the Los Angeles Times called, we pointed
out, "It smacks of grab, grab, grab. This is not consistent with shareholder democracy." In another
article, I believe I was quoted as saying the deal stinks to the high paddocks. They wrote these
things, among others, in the newspaper. Finally, after three or four quotes like this, the fellow
called me and said. "Mario, I don't want this company." How did that happen? Well, his son
would come home from school and say, "Dad, why are they saying these things about you?"
The Gandhian approach, in our context, also means we will not show up at an annual meeting, so
the directors won't get a quorum. Another tool is technology, specifically the Internet. For
example, our firm was sued by a closed-end fund shareholder who, although we told him he was
wrong, refused to drop the suit. So we put his name and the names of his lawyers on the Internet
and laid out our observations that they were careless and sloppy in their claims against us. All of
a sudden, they realized that their names were known to the world and that anyone conducting an
Internet search on them would come across this information and read our views about what they
did. So now they have settled with us. There are many ways we can use modern tools cost-
efficiently to instill effective corporate governance.
We created a "Magna Carta of Shareholder Rights" that states what we stand for so that
companies we invest in know in advance, for the most part, how we would vote.
We are in favor of
○ Cumulative voting
○ Golden parachutes (Why? Because we want management to think about harvesting
for us and not worry about the next job.)
○ One share, one vote
○ Cash incentives
○ Preemptive rights.
We will vote against
○ Greenmail, or voluntary repurchase of a hostile would-be acquirers shares at a
price significantly above market.
○ Poison pills, or antitakeover provisions
○ Supermajority voting
○ Blank check preferreds
○ Superdilutive stock options
○ Option resets.
This is our policy, but we will make exceptions when we encounter management that
demonstrates superior sensitivity to the needs of shareholders.
CEOs frustrate me when they build moats around themselves and when the moats deal with any
issue of corporate governance that precludes shareholders who have strong opinions - particularly
when the shareholders have been in the stock for five or 10 years. Poison pills are a clear example
of where managements, in my judgment, are creating bad will between themselves and their
shareholders.
We tend to be small-company oriented, so we need to telegraph to management where it should
go to earn a return for shareholders and how we would vote on that. We have a proxy voting
committee consisting of lawyers and analysts who research and track the companies we have
invested in. They try to find out if the management is oriented toward shareholders or trying to
enrich or entrench themselves. Then panel members vote on these issues, and we document the
votes and report them to the plan sponsor, as is required by law.
In closing, in the best of all possible worlds, corporate managers view shareholders and their
representatives as partners, not adversaries. the best way to maintain this relationship is through
truly democratic corporate governance. We believe it is an important part of our job to respond
passively, but forcefully, on issues that challenge corporate democracy.
Mario J. Gabelli is chairman of Gabelli Funds and adviser to the Gabelli family of mutual
funds and Gabelli Asset Management Company, a money management firm. A member of
the School's board of overseers, he is a leading practitioner of The Graham and Dodd
school of securities analysis.
Hypersonic sound system - this new technology will replace the annoying
loudspeakers. The specialty of this system is that it directs the sound beam to
wherever you want it without disturbing others. Conventional speakers produce
sound directly in air but the hypersonic sound technology produces sound indirectly
in air. For this it uses a property of air known as non-linearity. Even the best
loudspeakers are subject to distortion, and their omni-directional sound is annoying
to people in the vicinity who do not wish to listen.
The hypersonic sound system holds the promise of replacing conventional speakers.
It is quite certain that the hypersonic sound system is going to shape the future of
sound and will serve our ears with magical experience.