Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I am Joe Nahhas greatest and only physicist alive since 1258 AD telling idiots like the two
on my left Buzz off: Time travel based “modern Physics” is not physics but Einstein’s and
Western “University” academia garbage imposed in classrooms and used wrong in scientific
calculations to send 500,000 “physicists” to go work at Macdonald’s without loss of subject.
My name is Professor Joe Nahhas founder of Arabs real time physics July 4th 1973.
There is one and only one physics Arabs real time physics. Leonard Susskind is
not only an idiot but this is the proof of his and Einstein’s stupidity
This is me in October 2009 flashing my 1979 picture stapled to my thermo book
congratulating myself and buzzing off 500 years of “western” stupidity of physics and
buzzing off physicists and re - introducing real time physics that Arabs in 10th century
started with 1001 new Arabs real time physics formulas to change physics and history
Page 1
Confronting criminals in Alfred Nobel suit is my promise
Greetings: My name is Joe Nahhas and I was expelled from University of Michigan in 1991 and PHD wiped for exposing
criminals in Alfred Nobel suit Headquartered in USA department of energy
Frederick Reines 1953 US physicists of US DOE and Einstein’s dumbest thought E = mc2
Modern physics which is based on space – to time - back to space travel fiction is not physics
but Einstein’s and Alfred Nobel criminals’ stupidity imposed in classrooms and used in scientific
calculation terrorizing students with University “Professors’” stupidity
I Joe Nahhas accuse Nobel Prize winner Dr Stephen Chu of the crime of fraud
including scientific fraud money laundering in the amounts of billions of dollars
along with other Nobel Prize winners. Dr Stephen Chu is shelling billions in
research money when he knows it is all fraud. Crime started with Lorentz and
Einstein and the Alfred Nobel Prize Institution and USA department of energy is
where the crimes happened and keep happening. In 1953 Frederick Reines
rigged physics while he was working at USA department of energy to create the
dark energy multi billion dollars scam and the dark energy scam have/had
reached an unprecedented levels that criminals has to be confronted and Dr
Stephen Chu is a criminal in Alfred Nobel suit and it is the subject of this article
Western physicists after the 1932 two chemists discovery that the heavy metal of Uranium
can split releasing heat they raced for a way to speed up the splitting process to make a
heat bomb we call nuclear bomb. At this stage western physicists realized that they can
tell the USA congress and get all the money they want and they used visual effects to
claim new discovery fooling and blackmailing Congress the American people and
humanity and the time has come to expose them and who can expose them? I can!
There is no dark energy because it is based on modern physics and modern
physics is made up physics and can be deleted in its entirety without loss of
subject. I am that good and can show how modern physics is Garbage
Dark energy Neutrino crime:
The Nobel Prize in Physics 1995 was awarded "for pioneering experimental contributions to lepton
physics" jointly with one half to Martin L. Perl "for the discovery of the tau lepton" and with one half to
Frederick Reines "for the detection of the neutrino". Frederick Reines and many others used
visual effects to claim discovery when there is no discovery and he did it while
working for America’s most wanted crime hub called US department of energy
Einstein is fraud and E = mc2/2 and not E = mc2 Terrorist Einstein talk about
is dark energy visual Illusion after 106 years till can never be found
I can show you using 5th grade math that he is fraud by showing that 5th grade math
can solve the same problems Einstein solved and the problems Einstein cannot
solve. I can show you how USA department of energy used visual effect to verify
Einstein’s theory when his theory and the experimental proofs are nothing but
fraud and a crime
Modern Physics is Garbage: I can use 5th grade math to beat Alfred Nobel
physics and physicists
A = A; add and subtract B to get
A = B + (A – B); divide by B to get
A/B = 1 + (A – B)/B; multiply by C to get
(A/B) C = C + [(A – B)/B] C
If a Car has a velocity C at a distance A and the Car is moving away; then, the
car velocity would be measured as (A/B) C at a distance B and the
difference between the two velocities measurements at A and B is (A/B) C
– C = [(A – B)/B] C
C = classical physics = event time measurement of C
(A/B) C = real time measurements of C = quantum mechanics
[(A – B)/B] C = time delay Illusion = relativistic
Or Quantum = Classical + relativistic
Meaning when light was discovered and used as measuring tool physicists
started seeing Illusions confused for real thing and called it modern
physics. Real time illusions only use was speeding up the information age
called modern technology. Everything scientist said that it exist they have
no proof because it is an Illusion
(A/B) C = C + [(A – B)/B] C
í (θ + ω t)
Or, r = r 0 e
Page 5
The Nobel Prize in Physics 1995 was awarded "for pioneering experimental contributions to lepton
physics" jointly with one half to Martin L. Perl "for the discovery of the tau lepton" and with one half to
Frederick Reines "for the detection of the neutrino".
Reines and Cowan who claimed that if they install a tank of water close
to a nuclear reactor building and shield it from cosmic radiation then
the Neutrino can be found from seeing two γ- gamma signals.
The first signal γ- gamma signal is an indication of an Antineutrino
capture by a neutron and the second γ- gamma signal is an indication
of a neutron capture by cadmium and excited cadmium spits another γ-
gamma signal
A Water Tank with 200 liters of water and 40 CdCl2 or a mixture of tri
ethyl benzene
Page 6
* --------------------------------------------------------------------- *
signal 1 captured 25 μ seconds later signal 2 captures
Signal 1 and two differ by a small size captured on oscilloscope screens
Water has a refractive index of 4/3 and try ethyl benzene has a refractive index of
1.44
There was a time window of 25 micro seconds shots were taken and when a # 1
signal appeared in this 25 micro-seconds window the second window showed another
signal appearing within 0- 5 microseconds
A signal moving inside a medium is expected to get delayed from 0-5 micro
seconds in a 0-25 micro second window
The diffraction slows the motion inside a medium with refractive index n:
And r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)
With θ = 0
Then r = r 0 e í ω t
Dividing by c
Then
T = T (0)eỉωt
ỉωt
T = T (0) e ; ω t = arc tan (1/ n); n v = c; n = index of refraction; v = velocity
of light in medium; c = light speed in vacuum
T = T (0) [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t] = T (0) [1 - 2sine² (ω t/2) + ỉ sine ω t] = T (x)
+ ỉ T (y)
T (x) = T (0) [1 - 2sine² (ω t/2)] = T (0) {1 - 2sine² {[(arc tan (1/n)]/2}}
Δ T = T (x) - T (0) = - 2 T (0) sine² {[arc tan (1 /n)]/2}
Δ T = - 2 T (0) sine² {[arc tan (1 /n)]/2}
T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan [1 /n)]
T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan [3/4] = 0.8 T (0)
T (x) - T (0) = 0.2 T (0)
Δ T = 0.2 T (0)
The assumption that the free neutrino is detected at the Savannah River nuclear
power plant experiment in 1953 and published in nature 1956 by Reines and
Cowan and advertised by United Nations in 1958 is not only wrong but dead wrong.
The claim of a second signal detection delayed 5 micro second after the pair
annihilation indicating a neutron capture by Cadmium and proving the existence of
the neutrino to support Wolfgang Pauli Neutrino theory and relativity theory is not
justified. Here is why
Proof: The gate length is T (0) = 25 μ s (microseconds)
The Container that had Cadmium is basically Tri ethyl benzene mixed with water.
The refractive index of water at 25°C is 1.333 ~ 4/3 and the refractive index of tri
ethyl benzene is 1.44 with 5 to 1 ratio water to tri ethyl benzene which is a minor
distraction to water refractive index.
If all the mixture was Tri ethyl benzene because the literature says it is a mixture
and it say it is tri ethyl benzene
Δ T = - 2 x 25 {[sine² arc tan (1/1.44)]/2} = 4.46575 μ s time delays
The delayed signal within the 5 μ s intervals is not a sign of Neutrino capture but a
flash of light caught traveled and caught delayed. Meaning it is the same gamma
and not two different gammas. What Reines and Cowan did is measuring the same
signal in a 25 micro second interval at the start they measured the signal and in
that 25 micro seconds interval the signal had 5 micro seconds signal time delay
that was measured as a second event. Reines and Cowan claimed two signals the
first event was the signal of pair annihilation and the second event is the neutron
capture and releasing a second gamma ray when in fact looking at the same signal.
This is the basis of all dark energy fraud
California institute of technology Ahmed Zewail Femto Chemistry historical mistake is the
same repeated stupidity
Γ = t ℮ ỉ θ; θ = arc tan (v/c)
The index of refraction of Cyanogenic iodide is n = 1.64 [US Army articles on the
net]
With λ = c T: T (1) = 306 x 10 - 9/3 x 10 8 = 102 x 10 - 15
With λ = c T: T (2) = 388.9 x 10 - 9/3 x 10 8 = 129.633 x 10 - 15
So did Copernicus Galileo, Tyco Brahe, Kepler, Newton, Hooke, Le Verrier, Laplace Von Soldner,
………….
The entire western civilization 500,000 scientists used the same crime
Page 9
1 = 1 self evident
2 = 2 is self evident
Image = image = I is self evident line - 1
Object = object = O = self evident line - 2
And, - Object = - objects = - O = self evident line - 3
I=I line - 1
O=O line - 2
And, - O = - O line - 3
Adding: line - 1 and line - 2 and line - 3
I + O – O = O + (I – O) line - 4
I = O + (I – O); O – O = 0 one left side
(I/O) = (O/O) + (I – O)/O; dividing by on both sides line - 5
Or, (I/O) = 1 + (I – O)/O; O/O = 1 line - 6
(I/O) O = O + [(I – O)/O] O Line - 7
Real time object = event time Object + time delay object
Real time astronomy = event time astronomy + time delay astronomy
R1 R2 O2
Car size at distance 2
D D D
R1 O1 d
Page 3
Page 4
In old terms
Quantum = classical + relativistic
(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1]
(R2/R1) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] θ’0
This is Arabs real time astronomy distance scale to measure the angular velocity θ’0
(V2/V1) = 1 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1]
(V2/V1) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1] θ’0
This is Arabs real time astronomy Velocity Scale to measure the angular velocity θ’0
Planet Mercury angular velocity accumulation in arc second per hundred years
As an example: when Astronomers look at planetary motion around the sun and
they saw the angular velocity in arc second per century:
Equal to δ θ’ m = (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600)
= 70.75 arc second per century
Astronomers also saw the visual effect
Of: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = [(r m - r0)/r0] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600)
And it is equal to [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43
Where r m = Mercury – Sun distance = 58.2 X 106km
And v m = Mercury around the sun orbital speed Sun distance = 47.9 km/sec
And r 0 = r e = Earth – Sun distance = 149.6 X 106km
And T m = Mercury around the sun orbital period
Planet Distance r Planet Orbit Less Spin Angular velocity;
X 106km Orbit T speed v Earth speed v/r
in speed km/sec arc sec/ century
km/sec
Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 18.1 .002 70.75
Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 5.7 6.52 10.86
Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 .46511 4.1
Mars 227.936 687 24.14 0.2411
Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 12.6
Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 9.87
Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 2.59
Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 2.68
Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74
When astronomers measure the angular velocity from two different distances
they make the following error: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43
When astronomers measure Planet mercury angular speed around the Sun
from Earth r0 and not from the sun r m they make the following error
Error: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43
Page 6
Chapter Two
The confrontation between Arabs real time Astronomy and
Western Nobel prize winner modern space time astronomy
Arabs astronomers:
0
M Mercury S Sun
That:
1- All object classified as planets Suns Moons has a real time circular motion
As: r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)
And not
1 – Kepler - Newton’s ellipse r= [a (1 - ε²)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)]
Or Einstein’s rotating ellipse: r= a (1 - ε²)/ [1 + ε cosine (θ - Ψ)]
2- The difference between two real time circular motions is a visual rotating ellipse
Or, the difference between r1 = r 10 e í [θ (1) + ω (1) t] and r2 = r 20 e í [θ (2) + ω (2) t]
Is Arabs real time ellipse: r= [a (1 - ε²)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)] e í [θ + ω t]
Page 7
Alfred Nobel: The Man behind the Nobel Prize; Joe Nahhas: The Man after Alfred Nobel Institution head
Since 1901, the Nobel Prize has been honoring men and women from all corners of the globe for
outstanding achievements in physics. The foundations for the prize were laid in 1895 when Alfred Nobel
wrote his last will, leaving much of his wealth to the establishment of the Nobel Prize. But who was
Alfred Nobel? Meet Alfred Nobel - scientist, inventor, entrepreneur, author and pacifist. What is modern
physics? Did anyone hear the big bang? Did anyone saw a black hole? Did anyone find Einstein’s gravity
waves? Did anyone hook up a hose to the sky and found dark energy to verify E = mc2? Does anyone
have a proof of Newton’s action at a distance? Does anyone have a proof of Einstein time travel? Does
anyone figure out why humans have to accept Alfred Nobel prize winners claim that the universe is made
up of particles that dies and rebirth billion billion times a second? Hey dude I am a redneck one
grandfather was a damn farmer and my other grandfather was a damn Carpenter and my father was a
Carpenter by inheritance but I never knew what a dumb ass really is till I met my science teacher! What
did Alfred Nobel honor? The difference between an Alfred Nobel Prize winner physicists and fortune
tellers is a flip of a coin. Space - Time is not physics but Alfred Nobel physicists’ flip of a coin between a
crime and stupidity. Alfred Nobel Institution honored criminals in Alfred Nobel suit for all of past
century. Modern space – time physics changed physics from science to stupidity and physicists from
researchers to criminals. In writing: Yes I am after Alfred Nobel Institution head on my plate and I
accept nothing less. Space – time physics is stupidity itself. Ending Nobel Prize for stupidity from
classrooms and scientific calculations is the only Nobel thing left to do. Alfred Nobel Prize became 1001
times more worth in cash value. Big Institutions backed wrong physics and physicists for all of past
century for a prize and a billion dollars jack pot and garbage for physics. I am Joe Nahhas and I am
unknown to the world of physics but I have 1001 new physics formulas to cut Alfred Nobel Institution
head and delete Alfred Nobel Prize winner physics and physicists without loss of subject. This book is
just the beginning and it is prime time and it is Arabs real time astronomy
Page 8
Arabs in 950 AD said that light going vertical (blue) to the eye it will go through the eye to
be seen. The Arabs added that light coming oblique (pink) to the line of sight (blue line) we
would see the part of light (pink) that is equal to the amount of light of horizontal amount
(blue) or its vertical projection. What the Arabs concluded is that human eye and machines
are unidirectional that can only recognize the amount of light along the line of sight or line
of measurements. The Arabs mean that any point on the oblique pink line will be measured
as its vertical projection as the blue line. The Arabs added that the horizontal projection of
the pink line is the amount that would be measured as Zero or not seen at all. A point
location on the pink line would be measured as equal to its vertical projection on the blue
line and that part would be seen detected and measured by the eyes and instruments and
its horizontal projection would not be detected or measured by the eyes or instruments and
would be completely missed.
r0 sine ω t
r0
ωt
r0 cosine ω t
The angle between the pink line and the blue line is called light aberration angle. The
aberration angle between the line where an object is (pink) and an object projection is
with the eye as center. Light aberrations angle equals to: ω t = arc tan (v/c) where v
= relative velocity of the moving object and c is light velocity. The light coming from a
distant object is seen along the line of sight and that meant we do not measure actual
distance of an object r0 (pink line) but we measure its image or vertical projection
which is r0 cosine ω t (blue line) and we escape measuring the horizontal projection
r0 sine ω t which is perpendicular to the line of sight (black line).
Page 9
The Arabs said that we do not see or measure light reflected from objects but we
measure light speed projections as constant or light speed projections is
measured as constant.
c
c
c
The Arabs claim that we do not see objects position r0 but we see their visual position r.
What humans see is r0 measured along the line of sight and miss r0 perpendicular to the
line of sight. In other words an object at a distance r0 humans are not aware that they do
í ω (r) t
not see r0 but they see a visual of r0 which is r = r0 e and projection of r0 along
the line of sight that humans eye see and instruments measure is r0 cosine ω t and the
projection of r0 perpendicular to the line of sight is r0 cosine ω t. The Arabs added that
when accounted for, the difference between an object image or visual position r (quantum
mechanics) and object location or position r0 (classical mechanics) is equal to a time delay
effect (relativistic mechanics)
Page 10
This is the basis of correct measurements. The entire western civilization 500
years of physics and the world 500,000 “modern” western civilization educated
physicists made/make this mistake and globalize their stupidity and to correct
this mistake is to delete western civilization physicists without loss of subject.
There is nothing in “modern” physics that can be considered as correct
because modern physics is based on wrong measurements. Modern physics is
“wrong time physics” that can be deleted without loss of subject. Arabs real
time physics is the past present and future of all of physics and it is the subject
of this book.
Page 11
Arabs real time astronomy: The Arabs Astronomers and Physicists said that:
We can not see or/and detect or/and measure something in space that did not
exist; we can not see or/and detect or/and measure something that had not
happened. We can only see or/and detect or/and measure things and events in
space that had happened. What we see or/and detect or/and measure is not
necessarily what there is and not necessarily what happened. We see or/and detect
or/and measure traces and images of objects of past event. We see or/and detect
or/and measure in present time of images of object and events that happened in
past time. That is we measure images and record data of objects of past events in
present time. An event changes in time and when an event is measured it is
measured after it happened.
Present time = real time; past time = event time; (present time – past time) =
time delay, or, Real time = event time + time delay
Page 12
There are objects at locationr0 (actual or classical distance) and when measured in
í ω (r) t
real time they appear as at a location r (quantum distance) = r 0 e
That is the distance in the Universe is a classical distance but when a distance measured in
real time it appears as quantum distance and the difference between classical distance and
quantum distance is relativistic distance
í ω (r) t
We see detect and measure quantum distance r = r0 e of an actual or
íωt
classical distance r0 and the difference between quantum distance r = r0 e
and actual or classical distance r0 is relativistic distance
í ω (r) t
Take r = r0 e
í ω (t) t
Or, t = t0 e of an actual or classical time t0 ------------------ Eq - 3
í ω (t) t
And the difference between Arabs t = t0 e and actual or classical time t0 is
relativistic time
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product
S = m r; State = mass x location is all of astronomy needed Equation -1
That is if mass of objects in space is known and if the location of object in space is
know then the state S = m r = mass x location of any object in space can be
known and that is all needed to be known to describe space motion of any object
and that is what is called astronomy
That is mass m location r and time t = Astronomy and from this we can conclude:
Page 13
Chapter four
The size of the car object is the same but the size of the car image is dependent on car
distance and transmitted signal. Meaning we see detect and measure an image of size I
in real time (present time) of an object O seen detected and measured in event (past
time). That is when images of cars are seen these images of the cars are seen in real
time. And when these car objects move the car see itself the same size. That is we
measure images of object in real time and not objects. The difference between images
and objects are visual illusions Arabs knew about and described in 10th century Ad.
Conclusion:
Is that humans see detect and measure images of objects in real time
Modern physics is all wrong because Modern physics is wrong time physics based on
wrong physics measurements that misses by a factor of [(I – O)/O] q and this
quantity [(I – O)/O] q is taken as real experimental result and not as a relativistic
illusion correction. In other words:
Correct Physics is: (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q
Modern Physics is wrong because
(I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q
What we measure = what there is + visual effects
Quantum = classical + relativistic
Quantum = we see in real time = observer dependent = time dependent measurements
Classical = object independent of observer = time independent measurements
Relativity = illusions
In mathematical terms:
Relativity = time dependent measurements – time independent measurements
Real time scale
Page 16
Let us demonstrate the power of Arabs real time Physics and astronomy and see
how Arabs real time astronomy works but first let us do some definitions.
Page 17
θ’ m = 2 π /Tm= (v m/r m)
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Planet
r
Su
n
The Grand moron said planets travel in time around the Sun rotating the elliptical orbit
21
Mercury
r
θ
Sun
I am not saying Einstein is a moron but what I am saying is all western physicists
are morns to say the least and can be deleted without loss of subject to be exact.
Practicing again
If 1= 1
2=2
3=3
Then we can write anything that is equal to itself as equal to itself like:
Visual = Visual
Actual = actual
- Actual = - actual
----------------------- Add
Visual = Actual + (Visual – actual)
Divide by actual
Visual/actual = Actual/actual + (Visual – actual)/actual
Or
Visual/actual = 1 + (Visual – actual)/actual
Image/object = 1 + (Image – object)/object
I/O = 1+ (I – O)/O
We do not see object O but we see Image I. If we to look at planet Mercury from
Earth and not from the Sun, then we are not looking at θ’ m= 2 π /T m = (v m /r0) but
we are looking:
At θ’0 I/O = 1 θ’0+ [(I – O)/O] θ’0
Or θ’0 I/O = θ’0+ [(I – O)/O] θ’0
The visual illusion and Modern Physicists confusion is: [(I – O)/O] θ’0
Where I is Mercury – Sun distance = 58,200,000 kilometers = r m
And O is Earth – Sun distance = 149,600,000 kilometers = r e
The Visual Illusions and modern Physicists confusion of Planet Mercury is:
[(I – O)/O] θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] θ’0
Page 23
Multiplying by (t/t) = 1
Next
Is Galileo
Page 24
With r m = v m T m; r e = v e T e
Page 25
Tyco Brahe Velocity Illusion: [(r m – r e)/ r e] = [(r m /t) – (r e/ t)]/ (r e /t) = (v m – v e)/ v e
Page 26
(I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q
M r Lippershey you can even read the telescope and you are deleted
Hans Lippershey the person who attempted to get a patent for the telescope in 1609
Modern Physics is wrong because Hans and the entire Western civilization still
have no clue how to read the telescope
Page 27
Rene Descartes Cartesian failures
t = t0 e í ω (t) t
í ω (t) t
Γ = te
Along the line of sight
Γ x = t cosine ω t
Γ x = t + (Γ x – t) = t + ∆ Γ x; ∆ Γ x = (Γ x – t)
Γ x /t = t/t + (Γ x – t)/t
Γ x /t = 1 + (Γ x – t)/t
Page 28
Chapter 3: Arabs real time light motion
Visual objects seen through emitted or reflected light follow this law
Light measurement of visual motion of objects law: (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q
The proof:
Page 29
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a
location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the
product
S = m r; State = mass x location:
P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment
= change of location + change of mass
= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate
F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force
= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r
= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate
Page 30
From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0
Then r²θ' = h = constant
Differentiate with respect to time
Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0
Divide by r²θ'
Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0
And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]
Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0
Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t
Then u = A e - í θ
Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ
And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ
And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t
Or, r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)
í ω (r) t
Arabs real time astronomy is actually quantum mechanics r = r0 e
Light is emitted and not an emitter and humans have no means of measuring light
in motion and at best they can take a snap shot.
In mathematical language
Then r (θ, 0) = r 0 e í θ at t = 0
And r (θ, t) = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) = r 0 e í θ e í ω t = r (θ, 0) e í ω t
And r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) [cosine ω t + í sine ω t]
And r x (θ, t) = r x (θ, 0) cosine ω t
And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)]
31
Then ∆ r = r x (θ, t) - r x (θ, 0)
= r x (θ, 0) [(cosine ω t) – 1]
Page 33
When Newton came with F = - GmM/r²
Physicists calculated: θ' c m = v /r;cm
And v cm = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a]
And v s = √ (GM/a)
Page 34
W " (calculated) = [- π m/MT] (180/π degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 century); T
= days; with m = 0.32 x1024 kg; and M = 2.0 x1030 kg; T = 88 days
Page 35
Hooke’s for law F = - ω²x; 3 – Newton’s law F = - GmM/x²
If Hooke’s law is taken the F = - k r in one dimension
Then r’’ +ω²r = 0; then r (θ, 0) = r0 e ỉ ω t
Then r = r0 e ỉ ω t; and r = r0 [1- 2 sine² ω t/2]
And (r - r0)/ r0 = - 2 sine² ω t/2
The distance visual effect Error is: [(r m – re)/re] δ θ’ m
Page 36
Chapter Five: The all time wrong Astronomer
Then Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier came
The angular velocity of Mercury around the Sun is: θ m' = v m /r m
And δ θ’0 = (v m /r m) (180/π) (3600) (26526/Tm); Tm = 88 days
M
S
Page 38
Chapter six
Newton equation is a solved wrong for 350 years
Newton’s unprecedented stupidity
Planet
r
Su
n
The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product
S = m r; State = mass x location:
Location = r = r r (1)
F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r
F = F1 + F2
Page 40
The solution is not
And r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)]
But this solution
[λ +ỉω ]t
Real time solution is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r) (r)
Page 41
Mercury
r
θ
Sun
And the motion of a planet m around the Sun M measured in real time is a rotating ellipse
θ
ψ
Tyco Brahe Logged observational Data of Planets P motion around the Sun S and
then Kepler stated the areal velocity law: If Planet p observed from the sun then the
trajectory of planet p will cut equal areas in equal times.
Page 42
P
A A
A
A A
A A
P
T T
T
T T
T T
Page 43
When the areas size A are sliced equally it was found that the times spent by planets
orbiting around the Sun and making areas A each are equal also.
Or, r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1) = r² (2) θ' (2) = r² (3) θ' (3) = --
= location² x [angular speed] = constant
= Areal velocity
If r² θ' = h
Then differentiating with respect to time
Then d (r² θ')/ d t = d h/ d t
And 2 r r’ θ’ + r² θ’’ = 0
Or 2 (r’ /r) = - (θ’’/θ’)
The r = r0 e íωt
With r = r0 e íωt
Page 45
Chapter seven
Inverse Cube equations F = m γ = - k/r³ r (1), then in polar coordinates
With m [d² r/dt² - θ'²r] = - k /r³ Inverse Cube Gravitational law (1)
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Equation (2)
(2): d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0
Then m²r²θ' = constant; if m is taken as constant then r²θ' = h
And (1): d² r/dt² - r θ'² = [-GmM/r²] e k/r
Let m r =1/u
Then d r/d t = -u'/u²
= - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ
= (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ
= - h d u/d θ
And d² r/dt² = -hθ'd²u/dθ²
= - hu² [d²u/dθ²]
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = [-GmM/r²] e k/r
Nuclear Gravity (1)
48
And [1 – GMk/h²] = (GM/h²) a (1-ε²)
And h² - GM k = G M a (1- ε²)
(m α/ M r)
Nuclear Gravity (-GmM/r²) e
Let m r =1/u
Then d r/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = - h d u/d θ
And d² r/dt² = -hθ'd²u/dθ² = - hu² [d²u/dθ²]
-hu² [d²u/dθ²] - (1/u) (hu²)² = -G M u² [1 – (α m /M) u]; α m /M r << 1
Or (d²u/ dθ²) + (1 – Gmα/h²) u = GM/h²
And u = [GM/ h²]/[1 – Gmα/h²] + A cosine {√ [1 - Gmα/h²]}θ
Page 49
And φ = 43.03426909''/century
φ = 2 π m/2(m + M) = π m/ (m + M)
Page 50
Chapter Nine
Frequency Games
What is the accumulated value of 2 π f per century for planet mercury seen from
Earth?
The angular frequency is ω = 2 π f
How I would see ω of planet mercury turning around the sun from earth?
The answer is there will be a frequency change of
W = 2 π f [v* m - v*e]/v* e; radians per second
Where v*e = Earth orbital velocity around the Sun = 29.8 km/sec
And vº e = Earth spin speed = 0.465 km/sec
And v* m = Mercury orbital velocity around the Sun = 47.9 km/sec
With f = 1/T; f = frequency; T = Period = 88 days
If W is wanted in degrees multiply by: 180/π
If W is wanted in degree per century multiply by (180/π) x (36526 days/ T)
If W is wanted in arc second per century multiply by
(180/π) x (36526 days/ T) x 3600
W = [2 π f [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] x (180/π) x [36526 days/ (T days)] x 3600
With f = 1/T (seconds)
W = [360 x 3600 x (36526/T (days)] [1/T (seconds)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
W = [360 x 3600 x (36526/T (days)] [1/ 24 x 3600 x T (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
W = 15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 =15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
For Mercury
W = 15 x [36526/ (88)²] [(47.9 – 29.8)/29.8] = 43.0 arc second per century
The conclusion is
With ω = 2 π f = 2 π /T angular frequency in event time
And ω (real time) = ω (event time) + Δ ω
Δ ω = ω (real time) - ω (event time)
= 2 π f [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
= 2 π f Z; Z = [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
= red shift
And Δ ω = 2 π f (1 + Z)
The Advance of Planet Mercury Perihelion is 2 π f Z = 2 π Z/ T
Δ ω = (2 π/T) [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
In arc seconds per century: Multiply by: (180/π) [36526/T (days)] (3600)
And Δ ω = [2 π / T (seconds)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] x
(180/π) [36526/T (days)] (3600);
T (seconds) = T days x 24x 3600
Δ ω = [2 π / T days x 24x 3600] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] x
(180/π) [36526/T (days)] (3600)
Δ ω = [15 x 36526 / T² (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] = 43
Page 51
Chapter Ten: Space – time unlimited stupidity
Visual force: F = - Gm M/r² - Gm Mk/r³
With m [d² r/dt² - θ'²r] = - Gm M/r² - Gm Mk/r³ Visual Gravitational law (1)
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Equation (2)
Or, r 1 v 1= r 2 v2
This is the angular time delay and will be seen as angular visual Illusion
The angular speed is θ' = v/r
For Mercury: θ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843 radians/sec
If you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", then
And W" = (v/r) (180/π) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec per century.
What is the angular visual Illusion for planet Mercury that would be seen when
measured from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 106
And r (2) = Mercury = 58.2 x 106
Page 53
No Force solution
Newton said there is gravity Force F = -GmM/r² whose solution is this
Planet
r
Su
n
With r = r0 e íωt
Page 55
Abstract: light measurements are done along the line of sight and we measure light
projections to our eye. Meaning, that we do not measure distance r but we measure r
cosine arc tan (v/c) when light is used and as a consequence instead of measuring time
T we measure T cosine arc tan (v/c) and here is the experimental proof of it.
Your eyes
A000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 θ (2) 0 0 0
0 θ (1) 0 0 θ (3) 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
B------------------------- 0 --------------- 0 ------------- 0
1 2 3
The projections of light is what we measure and the projection of 1
and 2 and 3 is AB
If the angle between ray 1 and AB is θ (1)
If the angle between ray 1 and AB is θ (2)
If the angle between ray 1 and AB is θ (3)
Then C (1) cosine θ (1) = C (2) cosine θ (2) = C (3) cosine θ (3) = c = AB
Page 56
A Light V E L O C I T Y B2
O O O O O O O O O O
O θ C O
O O
O O
O V O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
B1
2/3
= 15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(Tm/ Te) – 1] = 43
1/2
= {[GM/r³]} [(v m – v e)/ v e] [(180/ π) (3600) (36526/ T m) = 43
1/2 2/3
= {[GM/r³]} [(Tm/ Te) – 1] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43
1/2
= {[GM/r³]} [(v m T m – v e T e)/ v e T e] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m) = 43
Page 58
Chapter Eleven
Arabs real time physics in outer Space
The problems Einstein and all others can not solve
Apparent Apsidal motion of binary (two) stars
This is the solution to the 150 years apsidal motion puzzle that is not solvable by
space-time physics or any said or published physics including 500 years of Modern
physics and 500,000 modern physicists. Binary stars apsidal motion or "Apparent"
rate of orbital axial rotation is a visual effect along the line of sight of moving
objects applied to the angular velocity at Apses. From the thousands of close binary
stars astronomers picked a dozen sets of binary stars systems that would be a
good test of relativity theory and modern physics collected data for all of past
century and relativity theory failed every one of them. This rate of "apparent" axial
rotation is given by this new equation
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} (v* + v°/c) ²
degrees/100 years
T = period; ε = eccentricity; v° = spin velocity effect; v*= orbital velocity effects
The simplest problem in physics that all 500 years modern physics and
500,000 modern physicists could not solve by any physics:
1 – As Camelopardalis
2 – DI Herculis
3 – V1143 Cygni
4 – V 541 Cygni
5 - AI Hydra
6 - V 731 Cephei
7 - SW Canis Majoris
8 - NV Canis Majoris
9 - GG Orion
10- CM Draconis
11- VV PYX
12 – EW Oriomis
13- V1147 Sagittari
14 – PSR 1913 + 16
12 – PSR 0737 – 3039
Solution: Location r = r r (1) ; Velocity v = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)
Acceleration γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)
S = m r; State = mass x distance
P = d S/ d t = d (m r)/d t = m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r
Velocity = v = (d r/d t); mass rate change = m' = (d m/d t)
P = m v + m' r; Momentum = change of state = change in location or change in
mass
F = d P/d t = d² S/d t² = d [m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t)]/d t
= m d² r/d t² + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d² m/d t) ² r
Page 59
F = m d² r/d t² + 2 (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d² m/d t) ² r
Force = Change of momentum
F = m a + 2 m ' v + m" r
F = - GmM/r²
Or, Newton's Kepler's equation: F = - GmM/r²
Then
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)
And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)
With m = constant, then m can be taken out from both equations (1) and (2)
With d² r/d t² - r θ'² = - GM/r² Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)
From 2: With m = constant; then d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0
And m² d (r²θ')/d t = 0
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0
And r²θ' = h
With (1): d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r²
With m = constant
Then m [d² r/ d t² - r θ'²] = - Gm M/ r²
And [d² r/ d t² - r θ'²] = - G M/ r²
Let r =1/u
Then d r/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = - h d u/d θ
And d² r /d t² = - h θ'd²u/dθ² = - h u² [d²u/dθ²]
And - h u² [d²u/dθ²] - (1/u) (hu²)² = - G Mu²
Or, [d²u/ dθ²] + u = G M/ h ²
u = G M/ h² + A cosine θ
And r = 1/u = 1/ [G M / h² + A cosine θ]
= (h²/ G M)/ [1 + (Ah²/ GM) cosine θ]
= (h²/GM)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)
This is Newton's Classical Equation solution of two body problem. We solved this
equation and we got the motion equation:
Is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] which is the equation of an ellipse with
eccentricity ε and semi - major axis a, and a semi- minor axis whose value is b = a
√ [1 - ε²] and two foci one equals to c = ε a, and the other foci location equals to -
c = - ε a. Or the motion of one ball around the other ball should be an ellipse with
the other ball at one of the foci +/- ε a, of the ellipse with semi major axes (- a, a)
on x-axis and semi minor axes (-b, b) on y- axis and foci (- c, c) on x- axis again
with angle of rotation θ. If this law to work on two planets instead of two balls like
planetary motion around the sun, then Astronomers should see this motion of a
planet moving around the sun in an ellipse with the sun at one of its foci.
Page 60
m
What astronomers saw was not an ellipse but a rotating ellipse like the ellipse
below wth rotating angle ψ
θ
ψ
Page 61
When the areas size A are sliced equally it was found that the times spent by planets
orbiting around the Sun and making areas A each are equal also.
Or, r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1) = r² (2) θ' (2) = r² (3) θ' (3) = --
= location² x [angular speed] = constant
= Areal velocity
If r² θ' = h
Then differentiating with respect to time
Then d (r² θ')/ d t = d h/ d t
And 2 r r’ θ’ + r² θ’’ = 0
Or 2 (r’ /r) = - (θ’’/θ’)
The r = r0 e íωt
With r = r0 e íωt
Δ W ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees
And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days
Page 62
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x
sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years
Astronomy re - written
Primary → v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓
Secondary ↓
v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]
[↑,↑]=orbit
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) - v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v* (p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples AS CAM
v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)
Examples
v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]
Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v*(p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples AS CAM
v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]
Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)
Examples AS CAM
Spin: v° = 40 + 30=70km/sec
And v* (e) = v* Earth = 29.8 km/sec
And vº (e) = 0.465 km/sec
Then v* + v °= v* (m) + v* (M) + v* (e) + vº (m) + v° (M) + vº (e)
= 110.178 + 145.435 + 70 + 29.8 – 0.465 = 355 m/sec
[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 1.43; T = 3.431days
Page 64
Calculations
1- ε = 0.5118; (1-ε²/4) = 0.94; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 3.33181; 1 + ε = 1.4882;
G=6.673x10-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x109m
V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 99.88 km/sec
V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 113.8km/sec
Page 65
W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan
114.85/300,000]
= (-720x36526/10.55) (3.33181) (114.85/300,000)²
= 1.22° degrees/ century
Observed: 1.24° degree/century +/- 0.05°
References:
1-Geminez and Margrave, 1985
[0.00071°/cycle] = [1 century = 36526days/7.641days] = 3.393987698°/century
Page 67
And a = [R (m)/r (m)] R (0) = (1.88/0.0440)0.696x10^9m = 29.73818182x10^9m
Then a (1-ε²/4) = 28.03x10^9m
And v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 75.5883km/sec; v° (m) =24
And v (M) = √ [Gm²/a (m + M) (1-ε²/4)] = 75.883km/sec; v° (M) =24
With v°=24 + 24= 44km/sec
And v* = 151.1766km/sec
With v* + v°= 151.1766 - 48 = 103.1766km/sec
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} {[v* + v°]/c} ²
W° (ob) = (- 720 x 365226/15.3379) (3.2339) (103.1766/300,000)²
W° (ob) = 0.65°
Notice: [v° (m), v° (M)] = [24 ± 2, 24 ± 2]
If v° (m) = v° (M) = 24 + 2 = 26
Then v* + v°= 151.1766 - 52 = 99.1766km/sec
And W° (ob) = (- 720 x 365226/15.3379) (3.2339) (99.1766/300,000)²
W° (ob) = 0.60°/century
Observed is W°= 0.60° +/ -0.1/century Lacy = [0.5°; 0.7°]
Relativity: W° = 0.97°/century
Calculations
1-ε = 0.77; (1-ε²/4) = 0.986775; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.6414
G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m
Then a = [R (m) / r (m)] = 19.24062059 x 10 ^ 9 m
Page 68
With v* = v (m) + v (M) = 81.11439578km/sec + 88.11km/sec =
169.2243958km/sec
And v° = v° (m) + v° (M) = 28 + 27 = 55 km/sec
Then (v* + v°) = 224.2243958 km/sec
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan
224.2243958/300,000]
= (-720x36526/8.29) (1.6414) (224.2243958/300,000)²
= 2.90°/ century
W° (observed) = 2.90°/century as measured
Observed is 2.90°/century
Space-Time Relativity theory 6.8° / century
Now let us calculate v* (cm) = ∑m v/∑m
= 2.15 x 81.11439578 + 1.98 x88.11= 84.46822 km/sec
With v* = 2 v*(cm) = 168.936411 km/sec; And v° = 55 km/sec
Then v* + v° = 223.9364411 km/sec and
W° (observed) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan 223. 936/300,000]
= (-720x36526/10.55) (3.33181) (223.9364411/300,000)²
W° (observed) = 2.9°0/century
With σ = √ {∑ [v* - v* (cm)] ²/2}
= √ {[88.11 -84.46822]²/2 + [81.11439578 - 84.46822]²/2}
= √ {[3.64178]²/2 + [3.35382422]²/2} = 3.5 km/sec
Then W° (ob) = 2.9°0/century; observed is W° = 2.9°/per century
And Einstein's 100,000 space-timers 6.8° / century
References: Go to Smithsonian/NASA website SAO/NASA and type:
1- Apsidal motion of AI Hydra Popper 1985
2- KH. F. Khaliulullin and V.S Kozyreva 1988
3- Petrova - Ovlav Apsidal motion catalogue 1999
6 - V731Cehpei Apsidal Motion Solution
Primary → v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓
Secondary ↓
v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]
[↑,↑]=orbit
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) - v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v* (p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples V731Cephei
v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)
Examples
v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]
Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v*(p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples
v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]
Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)
Examples V731Cephei
Next the same equation will be used to find the advance of Periastron or "apparent"
apsidal motion of V731 binary stars system.
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) x
{[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years
Calculations
M + m = 2.738; 1-ε=0.9835 1-ε²/4=0.9999 R (0) = .696x10^9m
Page 70
W° (obo) = (-720x36526/T) x {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} {[v* + v°]/c} ²
W°/century= (-720x36526/6.068567) (1.033694356)
(259.7856266 /300,000)²=2.91°/century
W°/century = 3.35914177°/century = 0.0335914177°/year
U = 360°/0.2048333818°/year;
U = 1757. 5 years
Page 71
Relativity theory coffin nail # 8 SW Canis Majoris
W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100
years
Page 72
SW CMa apsidal motion solution:
Data: T=10.09 days; r (m) = 0.0942; m = 2.22 M (0); R (m) = 3.01R (0); ε = 0.3179
And r (M) = N/A M = 2.03 M (0) R (M) =2.46 R (0); m + M = 4.25 M (0)
And [v° (m), v° (M)] = [30+/-2, 27+/-3]
K (1) = 80.5; K (2) = 87.8
Calculations
And, v* + v° = 218.7574713km/sec
73
9 - GG Orion Apsidal motion puzzle solution
Primary → v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓
Secondary ↓
v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑][↑,↑]=orbit [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) - v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v* (p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples GG Orion
v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)
Examples
v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]
Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v*(p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples
v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]
Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)
Examples GG Orion
Data: T=6.6314948; m = 2.342 M (0); M = 0.2338 M (0); R (1) = 1.852 R (0); R (2) =1.830
ε = 0.2218; 1 - ε = 0.7782; r (1) = 0.0746; r (2) =.988 r (1); m + M = 4.68 M (0)
And [v° (p); v° (s)] = [16 +/- 1; 16 +/- 1]; [v° (p); v° (s)] = [25 +/- 3; 24 +/- 3];
U = 10700 +/- 4500 years
Calculations
(1-ε²/4) = 0.9877; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.57
G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m
Calculations
With v* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 95.6 km/sec
And v* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 95.735 km/sec
And v° (p) = 16 km/sec; v° (s) = 16 km/sec
Then v* (p) + v* (s) + v° (p) + v° (s) = 223.335 km/sec
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/6.6314948) (1.57) [223.335/300,000] ² degrees/100
years
W° (ob) = 3.45°/century = 0.0345°/year
U [years] = 360/[0.0345°/year]
U = 10,432 years Nahhas
U (observed) = 10700+/-4500years
Page 75
Apsidal motion is given by this formula:
U [years] = 360/[0.06731598944°/year]
U (observed) = 5400+/-3200years
Einstein's and space-timers U = 360/ [0.00191x365.26] = 516 years
Can it get any better?
It is not just about dumping relativity it is dumping relativity and Alfred Nobel
institution with it.
11 - V 1147 Sagittari
V 1147 Sagittari: Data: U = 592.5 +/- 6 years
With K (p) = 117.4 km/sec; K(s) = 130.8 km/sec
Giving v* (p) = 117.4 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 146.735 km/sec
And v* (s) = 130.8 + 29.8 – 0.465 =160.135 km/sec
Orbital speed of earth = 29.8 km/sec; spin speed of earth is 0.465 km/sec
And vº (p) = 80 + 29.88 – 0.465 km/sec = 109.335 km/sec
And vº(s) =75 + 29.88 – 0.465 km/sec = 104.335 km/sec
Then v* + vº = 146.735 + 160.135 + 109.335 + 104.335 = 520.54km/sec
[√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 2.62
W (cal) = (-720x36526/3.28) x (2.62) (520.541/300,000)²= 63º/century
U = [63/100]-1x 360 = 570 years.
Observed values; 592.5
References
Absolute dimensions of solar-type eclipsing binaries V 1147Sagittari
J. Anderson, A. Gimenez 1985
Page 76
12- EW Orionis
EW Orionis: Data: U =16300 +/- 3900
With K (p) = 73.18km/sec; K(s) = 75.46 km/sec
Giving v* (p) = 73.18 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 102.515 km/sec
And v* (s) = 75.46 + 29.8 – 0.465 =104.795 km/sec
And vº (p) = 9 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 102.515 km/sec
And vº (s) = 73.18 - 29.8 + 0.465 = 102.515 km/sec
Orbital speed of earth = 29.8 km/sec; spin speed of earth is 0.465 km/sec
And vº (p) = 9km/sec; vº(s) =8.8km/sec
Then v* + vº = 102.515 + 104.795 +9.0 + 8.8 =225.11km/sec
[√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.167
Calculations
Page 77
With v* (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 103.70 km/sec
References
Absolute dimensions of solar-type eclipsing binaries EW Orionis
J.V. Clausen, H. Bruntt, E.H. Olsen, B.E. Helt, and A. Claret 2009
Page 78
Chapter 13: Alfred Nobel prize winner for less than a $
1993 Nobel Prize Winner Dr Joseph H. Taylor
Binary Pulsar 1913 + 16
For PSR 1913 + 16
Data: Joseph Taylor and Joel M. Weisberg 2004
With a =2.3417725 R (0); R (0) = 0.696 x 10 9meters
And ε = 0.6171338
T = 0.322997448930
And θ' = 4.226595 °/year
With mass m = 1.4414 M (0) and M = 1.3867 M (0); M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg
V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a] = 235.9574664 km/sec
V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a] = 245.2640841km/sec
W° (cal) = (-720x365.26/Tdays) x
sine² [Inverse tan (v/c)] degrees/100 years
= (-720x365.26/0.329974489) x sine² [Inverse tan (481.22/300, 00)] deg/100
years
W = 4.2°/year
References
The Double pulsar PSR J0737 - 3039
Burgay, M; D’Amico,N.; A.Manchester,R.N; Lyne, A.G.; Kramer, M; Mclaughlin, M.A; Lorimer, D.R;
Carmilo, F.; Stairs, I.H: Freire, P.C.C; Joshi,
Page 79
Chapter 14
B- Arabs Real time GPS or Real time Global positioning systems
Abstract: The Global Positioning System or GPS 45 micro seconds per day time
delays have nothing to do with Einstein's relativity theory time travels confusions of
physics and they are a consequence of Satellite orbital speed and Earth rotational
speed given by this formula below. Even if Einstein's formulas were correct for all
practical purposes they are insignificant to the performance to the GPS system.
Earth - Satellite distance is a variable that Engineers account for and the tiny
"relativistic" effect has no significance whatsoever because distance adjustment is
far more than any relativistic adjustment. For the president of the United States
President to ask for Innovations like that in an AAAS meeting is a sign of a
bankrupt scientific community and for those who knew the facts must have laughed
to their teeth at the president.
NASA's and AAAS laughing at the president requires a reply with laugh at AAAS and
NASA and all other including the person who wrote the speech for the president
GPS time delays of 45 micro seconds per day have nothing to do with relativity
theory or Einstein or AAAS or NASA or silly time travel physics or any theory. This
time delay is due to Earth rotation and satellite orbital speed that Scientists turn
their heads away from because without Einstein's silly magic sock of time travel
physics, Physicists will have less tricks that allows them to say anything publish
anything based on nothing for jobs money prestige Nobel Prizes and silly physics.
10 - Arabs Global Positioning System Circular Satellite Orbits time delays in seconds/day
U (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] (v/c) ² sec/day
Page 81
Chapter 15
Arabs Real time Interplanetary Telecommunications systems
Abstract: Interplanetary time delays around the moving sun derived from three
dimensional time-dependent Newton - Kepler's equations solution gives a solar
round trip time delay rate of:
ΔΓ= 16πGM/c³ [1 + (v°/v)] ² = ΔΓ0 [1 + (v°/v)] ²
ΔΓ0 = 16πGM/c³= 247.597μs
G = Gravitational constant; M=Sun mass; a=mean distance from Sun. And
eccentricity; c = light speed; a = mean distance
And v = Planet speed; v°= Sum/Difference in spin between Earth and planets.
When applied to actual data it gives extremely accurate results better than
Shapiro's Space-time-delay analysis and without space-time fictional forces or
space-time fiction.
Page 82
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x [(v° + v*)/c] ²
degrees/100 years
ΔΓ = 250μs Mars-Earth.
These data compared to Shapiro's time delay from NASA 1977 Vikings 6, 7 Earth -
Mars Telecommunications mission are more accurate because the actual value is
250μs and the value published by Doctor Irwin Shapiro of Harvard is 247.597μs
Although this formula works the correct formula is
Δ θ = -4π [(v° + v*)/c] ² Sun-Photon; and with v° ≠ 0
v = √ [GM/a] = 24.1 km/sec; vº = 0.46511 – 0.241 = 0.224 km/sec
ΔΓ = 2 arc length/c = 2[Δ θ] d/c
= 16πGM/c³ [1 + (vº/v)] ² = 247.597 x [1 + 0.224/24.1)]²
Δ Γ = 250 µs For Mars; 0.4651 = Earth rotation; 0.241 = mars rotation; v = mars
speed
Harvard physics department is where physics changed from science to stupidity
Page 84
If we took a look at the most famous physics fundamental constant G from Newton's
350 years old Equation F = - GmM/r², or, Coulomb electric force equation F = - Qq/4π
ε 0, one can see that, for example, G’s value has unit dimension of [G] = [1/ρ T²]; ρ is
density and T is time rotational period. If we can show that the gravitational constant G
= G (ρ, T) is a variable air density and Earth rotational period dependent then we can
say what Earth is saying that the most famous physics fundamental constants are not
so universal constants because all three fundamental constant are air density and Earth
spin dependent.
Proof: G = G (ρ, T) = 1/ [(2/5) (4 π/3) ρT²] = √ (2π)/ (4 π/3) ρT²
Nothing that: 8 π /15 = (2/5) (4π/3); 4π/3 and 2/5 come from spherical aspect
Where: ρ = air density; T = Earth rotation period
The 2/5 is the ratio for radius of gyration of a sphere
Taking T = 24 hours and ρ = 1.2045 kg/m³
G = 1/ (8 π/15) ρT² = 6.674 x 10 - 11
And ε 0 = 1/4πρT² = 8.85 x 10 -12
And μ = 4πρT²/c²
0
When Newton’s equation F = - mM/r² was solved it produced the angular velocity r’
= r’0 e í ω t
Divide by c
And r’/c = (r’0/c) e íωt
T = T0 e íωt
And f = f0 e - í ω t
And f = f x + f y = f 0[cosine ω t - í sine ω t]
And f x = f 0 cosine ω t
And f x - f 0 = f 0 [1 – 2 sine² (ω t/2)] - f 0
And δ f = f x - f 0 = – 2 f 0 sine² (ω t/2)
And δ f/f 0 = - 2 sine² (ω t/2) Up
And δ f/f 0 = 2 sine² (ω t/2) Down
And δ f/f 0 (total) = [2 sine² (ω t/2) Down] – [- 2 sine² (ω t/2)]
And δ f/f 0 (total) = 4 sine² (ω t/2)
With ω t = arc tan (v/c)
With v = δ f/f 0 (total) = 4 sine² [(arc tan √2gh) /2]
With v << c
Page 86
Set up this round rotating table in 1887 with a lamb, two mirrors beam splitter,
telescope
Page 87
In Modern times an animation of the experiment would look like
Their reasoning was that if they rotate the table 90 degrees they would see the
interference pattern should change looking through the telescope.
When the interference pattern did not change they claim that physical quantities
data would not change when rotated 90 degrees or 1 = 1 +i
A. Michelson and E. Morley
Handymen in white ropes confusions of an Experiment
In General
V = v = Velocity of Earth assuming that emitter - receiver line-up with earth line
travel at start and during this whole experiment. That would be the x-x line
X' ------Earth moving in this direction with velocity v -----------X
And C = c at start
What is turning is the table that has the lamb and the mirrors and the telescope on
top of it.
Page 88
1-Assume θ = 0° Arm A
Then: V = v; C = c; d = d
Forward is C-V = c - v
Backward C+V = c + v
And t = d/ (c-v) + d/ (c + v)
2- Assume θ = 90° then e î 90 = î Arm B
Then V = v; C = c î; d = d î
Forward is C-V = -v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²)
V is along the x-x and has no component on y-y axis and î means along the y-y
axis
Backward C+V = v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²)
And comes to this is Position I
Position 1: Right-Upper
Right: t (1) = d/ (c -v) +d/ (c +v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)]
Upper: t (2) = d/√ (c² + v²) + d√ (c² + v²) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 +
v²/c²)]
Now Position II
3-Assume θ = 90° Arm A
Then: V = v; C = ỉ c; d = d
Forward is C-V = -v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²) MMX mistake √ (c² -
v²)
Backward C+V = v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²)
And t' (1) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)]
4- Assume θ = 90° + 90° =180 then e î 180 = -î Arm B
Then V = v; C = -c; d = d
Forward is C-V = -c - v; V is along the x-x and has no component on y-y axis and î
means along the y-y axis
Backward C+V = -c + v
Then t = d/-c+ v forward and in absolute value t = d/ (c - v)
And t = d/-c -v backward and in absolute value t = d/ (c + v)
And t' (2) = d/ (c - v) + d/ (c + v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)]
With t' (1) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)]
Conclusions is turning the table 90° has no effect what so ever on time length
difference
In General
If we twist the table by an angle θ then V = v; C = c e î θ; d = d e î θ; e î θ = cosine
θ + î sine θ
Now position I
V = v; C = c cosine θ + î c sine θ; d = d cosine θ + î d sine θ
Forward: C - V = c cosine θ -v + î c sine θ and its measure is √ [(c cosine θ -v) ²
+ c² sine ² θ]
Backward: C + V = c cosine θ +v + î c sine θ and its measure is √ [(c cosine θ +
v) ² + c² sine ² θ]
Page 89
Right: t (1) = d/ (c -v) +d/ (c +v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)]
Upper: t (2) = d/√ (c² + v²) + d√ (c² + v²) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²)
= (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)]
If θ = 30° then,
And t (1) = d / c √ [(√ 3/2 -v/c) ² + 1 /4] + d / c √ [(√ 3/2 + v/c) ² + 1 /4]
And t (2) = d / c √ [(1/2 -v/c) ² + (√ 3/2) ²] + d / c √ [(1 /2 + v/c) ² + (√ 3/2)
²]
We can take (d/c) Then Multiply that at the end
If θ = 0 then,
Right: t (1)/ (d/c) = 2 / (1- v²/c²)] = 2.00000002
Upper: t (2)/ (d/c) =2/√ (1 + v²/c²)] = 1.99999999
Then δ t = 3 x 10-8 (d/c) = 3 x 10-8 (d/300,000,000) = 10 -16 d
Then δ t = 10 -16 d
If θ = 30° then,
And t (1)/ (d / c) = √ [(√ 3/2 -v/c) ² + 1 /4] + √ [(√ 3/2 + v/c) ² + 1 /4] =
0.99999134 + 1.00000866 = 2
And t (2)/ (d / c)
= √ [(1/2 -v/c) ² + (√ 3/2) ²] + √ [(1 /2 + v/c) ² + (√ 3/2) ²]
= 0.999995 + 1.000005 = 2
Then δ t' = 0
So the difference is
ΔΓ = δ t - δ t' = 10 -16 d
With fringe shift = c ΔΓ/ δ r = 3x10-8d/λ; λ = 5.9 x 10^-5 c m; d = 11m =1100c m
With (d/λ) = 1100/ (5.9x 10-5)
Then fringe shift = (3300x10-8)/ (5.9x 10-5) = .559322034
Well if fringe shift does not happen at angle 90° and fringe shift happens at 30°
why no shift seen?
The initial problem was and is the lineup of apparatus with earth velocity which is
impossible because of the infinite numbers of possibilities of earth motion in space
and if it happened it will be momentarily.
MMX will never work and all similar experiments will not work unless it is designed
as a 3-dimensional set-up and not a one-dimensional wish washy set-up
An ideal setup is a spherical set-up but a more realistic setup will be discussed
below how to find earth path in space
Page 91
Page 92
Chapter 17 Earth Path in real space in real time
Earth path in space is possible and Einstein can keep his relativistic
trash to himself: Self – referenced motion
There is a serious problem in all of physics and that is timing of
experiments and physics experiments theory.
Earth absolute motion is a circle that is going to tie spin to orbit motion and waiting
experimental verifications
Finding new sources of energy requires the elimination of bad physics and bad
physics is E = mc² because it is based on space - time physics and space time
physics is wrong because I can prove it wrong as follows.
What is wrong with space - time is that it is a wrong idea and it is without proofs.
Time is a human made scale and making it a dimension is scientifically stupid and
the reasoning behind accepting time as a dimension and not as a scale is the
assumption that it matches experiment. Time as a dimension allowing the
exchange of time for space or squeezing space to expand time is not acceptable to
me regardless what all Nobel prize winners have said about it and regardless what
the 100, 000 living physicists are saying about it and regardless what all 100, 000
dead physicists had said about it because it is wrong and proving it wrong is what I
can do and did the first time I read what started it and that would be the original
dumb idea and experiment in Cleveland Ohio in 1887 by Michelson and Morley.
What dumb Michelson and Morley experiment did is it started stupidity as accepted
science.
The stupidity of Michelson and Morley experiment is the following.
We can not measure something that did not happen. We can only measure
something that had happened. We can measure something in present time that
had happened in past time.
Michelson and Morley experiment is stupid because two handymen in white robes
tried to measure something in real time and wondered why they did not see it in
past time.
What we measure = what happened + what changed till things are measured.
Real time physics = event time physics + time delays physics
What we see or measure is relativistic = Absolute event + relativistic time delays
What happened is absolute = real time relativistic event - real time relativistic
effects
Page 93
Real time = event time [this is the wrong idea that started space - time stupidity]
What are missing are time delays
[Known as quantum theory and relativity theory]
This formula is my 1973 discovery that not only Nobel Prize winners are wrong but
all of physics and physicists are wrong because physics solution is based on the
idea that:
In one dimension:
The problem is very simple, I would send a signal to 2 signals to two equidistant
repeaters that send back the signal to me and the signal that comes first indicate a
motion in opposite direction. Installing a multi opposite directional repeaters
system and one signal and for each tow opposite direction have on timer will
produce Earth path in absolute space and may produce the greatest formula in all
of Physics and that would be mass motion and spin and better than that it will
erase stupidity from classrooms know as space - time.
Abstract: Finding new sources of energy require the elimination of bad physics
and bad physics is Einstein's space-time (x, y, z, ict) confusion of physics that lead
to energy fraud symbol E = mc² because energy spent is based on distance
traveled and not relative distance and distance traveled is self referenced distance
or absolute motion and finding this motion is waiting on funding for discovery since
the beginning of time and experimentally is possible. Discovering Earth absolute
motion in space could be one of the greatest discoveries in physics of all time
because it will answer the trillion dollar question if mass m spin s and absolute
motion r are related by a mathematical formula that expresses a physical law and if
this law is to be found can it explains the structural design of the solar system and
if so what applications of such a law is useful inside the nucleus to produce new
sources of energy?
Page 94
The experimental set - up
Timer T x
And d
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<E>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d
Sensor y' Emitter E y Lead Sensor y
E
Timer T y
And d
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<E>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d
Sensor z' Emitter E z Lead Sensor z
E
Timer T z
1-Assume there is a pulse emitter E shooting pulses in six different directions of the
Euclidean system of axes per unit time τ; x'-x and y'-y and z'-z axes at six
equidistant receivers of distance d and has three wire leads Ex, E y, E z connected
to three Timers Named T x , T y, and T z.
3- Three timers are named timer T x with three wires one to receiver x' and one
wire to receiver x and one wire to emitter wire lead E x and timer T y with three
wires one to receiver y' and one wire to receiver y and one wire to emitter wire
lead E y and timer T z with three wires one to receiver z' and one wire to receiver z
and one wire to emitter wire lead E z are used
4- These six pulses has their directions grouped in three sets of pairs x'-x, y'-y, z'-
z.
5- Three timers T x; T y, and T z are associated with the three axes respectively
a - Timer T x takes measurements from Emitter lead E x; receiver x' and receiver x
b - Timer T y takes measurements from Emitter lead E y; receiver y' and receiver y
c - Timer T z takes measurements from Emitter lead E z; receiver z' and receiver z
Page 95
Now
d <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<E>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d
Sensor x' E x Lead Sensor x
Emitter
E
t x' Timer T x tx
1- Timer T x receives 3 signals
a- From lead E x a signal departures from emitter E to T x register E [T x, n = 1, 2, 3,]
b - From receiver x' a signal departures to timer T x [t x', n =1, 2, 3,]
c - From receiver x a signal departures to timer T x [t x, n =1, 2, 3,]
If t x' - T x is the travel time from emitter E to receiver x'
And t x - T x is the travel time from emitter E to receiver x
Conclusion:
The idea of this experiment is to find distance travel segments r (1); r (2); r (3); r
(4); ...ETC; then join them together.
With [r (1); τ]
O -------------- O [r (4); τ]
- - O ------------------
[r (2); τ] - -
- - [r (3); τ]
- O
r (1) = X1 + Y1 + Z1
r (2) = X2 + Y2 + Z2
r (1) = X3 + Y3 + Z3
r (4) = X4 + Y4 + Z4
The smaller the signal time interval or period τ then the more accurate the
experiment. Such a set-up is not only capable of finding absolute motion but it will
give clues to finding the relation between mass m spin s and its orbit r of planet
Earth. If mass m motion r and spin s are found to be related it will the greatest
formulas of all time because all there is in the Universe is mass m space r and spin
s. Earth mass m and spin s are know but mass r is Earth absolute motion that had
been waiting on funding for discovery since the beginning of time.
Page 97
Chapter 18
Johann Georg Von Soldner 1801 light bending historical mistake
Proof:
With (2): d (r²θ')/d t = 0
Then r²θ' = constant = h
Differentiate with respect to time
θ ς
Real time orbit: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] ℮ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
This equation is real time Universal mechanics solution
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
This: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r) --------------------------------- I
It is the math formula that matches a physical experiment
If time is frozen that is t = 0
Then r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] we get the classical or event time solution ----------- II
Relativistic is the difference between I and II
Or, θ” (θ, t) = - 2 ì ω (r) [h/ r² (θ, 0)] [cosine 2 ω (r) t + ί sine 2 ω (r) t]
Page 100
Or ψ ≈ 4 (v/c) ² radians
Or, ψ ≈ 4 (v/c) ² x (180/π) degrees
Or, ψ ≈ 4 (v/c) ² x (180/π) x 3600 seconds
With v² = GM/R
Then ψ ≈ 4 GM/R c² x (180/π) x 3600 seconds
Einstein with the help of others rigged eternity to come up with 4 (v/c) ² and not 2 (v/c)
² to justify experimental illusions or 2[2(v/c) ²]
Ψ = 7200 [arc tan (437.89 / 300,000)] sine 2 [arc tan (437.89/300,000)]
= 1.757855865 arc second
MR Eddington: keep the trash to England Royals
101
Real time Physics: We can only measure past events. We can not measure
something that did not happen. We can only measure things that had happened.
What we measure is not what happened. We measure in present time an event
that happened in past time.
If an event happens on Planet Mercury and the event is seen from the Sun at event
time t, then this same event would be seen from Earth in real time as time Γ = t +
ΔΓ
Γ = t + (Γ - t)
Real time = Event time + time delays
Γ = t + Δ Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y) = t + Δ Γ
Δ Γ = Δ Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y)
Δ Γ (x) is along the line of sight time delays
Δ Γ (y) is perpendicular to the line of sight time delays
Γ = t (Γ/t)
ỉωt ỉωt
Γ=te ; Γ/t = e
ίωt
Γ=te
ίωt ίωt
Multiplying by c, then r = c Γ = c t e = r0 e ; ω T = arc tan (v/c)
ίωt
Or r = r0 e
Page 103
Case I
Constant velocity of light principle: v 0 = ω r 0 = c
Then
Ex = (m/2) [(c² - c²) cosine 2ω t - 2 c² sine 2ω t]
Ex = (m/2) [- 2 c² sine 2ω t]
Ex = - m c² sine 2ω t
A – Light aberration ω T= arc tan (v 0/c)
Ex = - m c² sine 2ω t
Ex = - m c² sine 2 [arc tan (v 0/c)]
Ex = - m c² sine 2 [arc tan (c/c)]
Ex = - m c²
B – Michelson and Morley ω T = [π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)]
Ex = - m c² sine 2ω t
Ex = - m c² sine 2[π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)]
Case II
Rest Energy Principle: v 0 = 0; ω r 0 = c
Then
Ex = (m/2) [(0² - c²) cosine 2ω t - 2 c (0) sine 2ω t]
Ex = (m/2) [- 2 c² cosine 2ω t]
Ex = - m c² cosine 2ω t
A – Light aberration ω T= arc tan (v 0/c)
Ex = - m c² cosine ω T= arc tan (v 0/c)
Ex = - m c² cosine 2 [arc tan (0/c)]
Ex = - m c² cosine 2 (0)
Ex = - m c²
B – Michelson and Morley ω T = [π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)]
Ex = - m c² cosine 2ω t
Ex = - m c² cosine 2[π/2 + arc tan (0/c)]
Ex = - m c² cosine 2(π/2)
Ex = - m c² cosine π
Ex = - m c² (-1)
Ex = m c²
Page 104
Michelson Morley
This 1907 Nobel Prize winner Dude along with this Dude put a Lamp two mirrors
and a telescope on a round rotating table.
This was the set –up.
Page 105
Michelson and Morley looked at the virtual image from the two mirrors of
light reflections through the telescope. They claim that if they to rotate the
table then the image should change. When Michelson and Morley rotated
the table in 1887 and the image did not change they claim that you can
rotate data without change in results!
Then conclusion of this wacky claim that won a Nobel Prize is that
The number 1 can be replaced by 1 + i; i is the complex number
Page 106
i
The crooks of “University” are using visual effects to claim Dark energy or an
expansion of 500 years of western stupidity and fraud in physics
Page 107
Chapter 20: special relativity stupidity
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a
location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the
product
S = m r; State = mass x location:
P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment
= change of location + change of mass
= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate
F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force
= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r
= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate
Where S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = cosine arc tan (v/c)
With v/c << 1 then; Where S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = cosine arc
tan (v/c)
In absolute value S = r
Along the line of measurement: S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)] ≈ r √ [1-(v/c) ²];
v/c << 1
This the equation for length contraction of Lorentz's used in Einstein's theories
But it is the light aberrations visual effects and it is "apparent and not real
These are time dilatation equations given by Einstein’s special relativity theory.
Two observers observing the same thing the time dilations are
Then, t x = t √ [1-(v/c) ²]; t = {1/√ [1-(v/c) ²]} t x absolute math; Lab purposes
And, t x' = t √ [1-(v'/c) ²]; t' = {1/√ [1-(v'/c) ²]} t x' absolute math; Lab
purposes
5- Energy
E = m (0) c²; v = 0
Page 111
Chapter 21
Quantum mechanics Copenhagen Cyclic Interpretation
Ape Man Modern Physicist Nobel Prize Ape Ass.
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the
product
S = m r; State = mass x location:
P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment
= change of location + change of mass
= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate
F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force
= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r
= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate
In polar coordinates system
r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1)
r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration
F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r
F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r
(1)
= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)
= [-GmM/r²] r (1) ---------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law
Page 112
Proof:
First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)
Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t
= r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]
= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)
Page 113
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1
And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = 0
Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = 0
Then u = A e - í θ
Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ
And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ
And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t
Or, r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)
í ω (r) t
Arabs real time astronomy is actually quantum mechanics r = r0 e
Light is emitted and not an emitter and humans have no means of measuring light
in motion and at best they can take a snap shot.
In mathematical language
Then r (θ, 0) = r 0 e í θ at t = 0
And r (θ, t) = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) = r 0 e í θ e í ω t = r (θ, 0) e í ω t
And r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) [cosine ω t + í sine ω t]
And r x (θ, t) = r x (θ, 0) cosine ω t
And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)]
Then ∆ r = r x (θ, t) - r x (θ, 0)
= r x (θ, 0) [(cosine ω t) – 1]
And [r x (θ, t) - r x (θ, 0)]/ r x (θ, 0)
= [(1 - 2 sine² ω t/2) – 1]
= - 2 sine ² ω t/2; ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)]
rabs real time astronomy:
Image = Image = I
Object = Object = O
- Object = - Object = - O
Mercury
r
θ
Sun
Figure - 1
Newton and Hooke reiterated the same thing as Kepler and wrote: r/ t2 = k/r2
Astronomers found that the motion is not an ellipse but a rotating ellipse
Einstein wrote another acceleration law r/t2 = k/ r2 + k1/r4 to describe a rotating ellipse
7 billion people were told by Alfred Nobel prize winner physicists that Planets rotate
around the Sun in a rotating ellipse
I am Joe Nahhas
And I am better than good and I am after Alfred Nobel Institution head
Page 117
Mercur
y
θ
ψ
Sun
It is a fact that Astronomers see this axis tilt and Einstein got a formula for it: ψ = {6 π G
M/a c² (1 - ε²)} [180/ π] [36526/T (days)][3600]
G = 6.673 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant
M =2x1030kg = mass of the Sun
Page 118
Page 119
I am not saying that Alfred Nobel physicists are idiots to say the
least but what I am saying is that Alfred Nobel prize winner
physics is stupidity itself and Alfred Nobel prize winner
physicists are crooks to be exact. Time is not a structure like
space to allow Alfred Nobel Institution to dictate stupidity in
classrooms on the rest of us and Alfred Nobel Physicists can
keep stupidity to themselves. Alfred Nobel prize is worth 1001
times in money. Alfred Nobel prize is a 1 billion dollar business
each. Big Institutions with massive funding needs backed bad
physics and idiots for physicists for 1 billion dollars prize and
the world stuck with garbage for physics.
What is modern physics?
Did anyone hear the big bang? Did anyone saw a black hole? Did anyone find Einstein’s gravity waves?
Did anyone hook up a hose to the sky and funnel dark energy to verify E = mc2? Does anyone have a
proof of Newton’s action at a distance? Does anyone have a proof of Einstein time travel? Does anyone
figure out why humans have to accept Alfred Nobel prize winners nuclear claims that the universe is
made up of particles that dies and rebirth billion billion times a second? Hey dude I am a redneck one
grandfather was a damn farmer and my other grandfather was a damn Carpenter and my father was a
much damn redneck I sometimes feel reluctant to claim him but I never knew what a dumb ass really is
till I met my science teacher talking about the greatest idiots of physics starting With the seven idiots in
order Copernicus Galileo Newton and Einstein!
Page 120
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the
product
F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r
(1)
= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/m r) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)
= [-G m M/r²] r (1) -------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law
Page 121
Proof:
First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)
Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t
= r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]
= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)
Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ;
And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1)
And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1)
Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t
= r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t
γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r)
And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0
With m = constant, then
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2
Page 122
Then u = A e - í θ
Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ
And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ
And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t
í (θ + ω t)
Or, r = r 0 e
What I am saying Dear Pope is this is the equation of motion of
any planet!
í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e
The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
Sun r
r s Mercury
r1 r0 r m
X1 r2
X2
Earth
Page 123
In mathematical form: r1 = x1 + r s
And r2 = x2 + r m
Then r2 - r1 = x2 - x1 + r m – r s
Or, r = r0 + (r m – r s)
To find the extreme values of r,
Then: d r/d t = d r0/d t+ (d r m/d t – d r s/ d t) = 0
And d r m/d t = d r s/ d t
í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e
The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
And d r m/d t = r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] e
í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
And d r s/ d t = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] e
And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = [(r m 0/ r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]
Is: [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
= [(r m 0/ r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
Page 124
Is: [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
= [(r m 0/ r e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = 43
r m 0
r s 0
M M Mercury S Sun
r m0 r 0
Page 125
Mercury
r
θ
Sun
Figure - 1
Page 126
Page 127
Mercur
y
θ
Ψ
Sun
Ψ ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees
And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days
Page 128
Greetings: my name is Joe Nahhas and I am the greatest physicist of all time since July 4th 1973
I am unknown to the world of physics but I have 1001 new real time physics formulas to change physics and
history to delete all physics and wipe out written history and this is a revolt!
Abstract: There is no solar system and Earth does not move around the Sun. I can say
that there is no solar system and Earth does not move around the Sun because I can
prove that there is no solar system and that Earth does not move around the Sun. There is
a solar group of objects humans call one star few planets and few moons. Each object of
the solar group has its own independent orbit (circle) and all are in the same neighborhood
looking like a solar “system” where Earth is visually looking like it moves around the Sun
in an ellipse and the Sun at the focus (not center) of that ellipse. Gravity is a spin effect
found inside the atmosphere. There is no gravity outside the atmosphere. There is no
gravity between Earth and Sun. Taking that there is no gravity between Earth and Sun
leads to a circular motion for the Sun and a circular motion for Earth. The difference
between two circular motions is visual motion and not an actual motion of an ellipse. An
ellipse motion requires an inverse square law that is given by Newton’s equation that says
the gravitational force F between Earth of mass m and the Sun of mass M is given by F = -
G m M/r² where r is the distance between Earth and sun and G is a constant number. A
rotating ellipse requires Newton’s law of space motion - G m M/r² and Einstein’s time
motion k/r4 to a total force of F = - G m M/r² + k/r4 in contradiction to Qur’an F = 0
In Short Planets Moons Sun all swim freely and no gravity restrictions. No gravity means the Force F = 0. The
solution of F = 0 leads to a circular orbit for all
. Sun r
r s Mercury
r1 r0 r m
X1 r2
X2
Earth
r s 0
M M M Mercury S Sun
r m 0 r 0
Gives a visual ellipse and visual (not actual gravity) meaning planets seems to move around the Sun
and not actually moving around the Sun
Mercury
r
θ
Sun
Figure - 1
If we took a look at the most famous physics fundamental constant G from Newton’s 350 years old Equation F = -
G m M/r² G’s value has unit dimension of [G] = [1/ρ T²]; ρ is atmospheric density and T is time rotational period.
If we can show that the gravitational constant G = G (ρ, T) is a variable air density and Earth rotational period
dependent then we can say what Earth is saying that the most famous physics fundamental constants are not so
universal constants because all physics fundamental constant are air density and Earth spin dependent. For
example:
G = G (ρ, T) = 1/ [(2/5) (4 π/3) ρT²]; 5/2 ~ √ (2 π)
Nothing that: 8 π /15 = (2/5) (4π/3); 4π/3 and 2/5 come from spherical aspect
Where: ρ = air density; T = Earth rotation period; T = 23.9333 hours and ρ = 1.2045 kg/m³
G = 1/ (8 π/15) ρT² = 6.674 x 10 – 11
[G] = [1/ρ T²] ~ 0 if spin period is very long or atmospheric density is very high
This fact applies to electromagnetic fundamental constants:
Like ε (0) = 1/4πρT² = 8.85 x 10 -12; μ (0) = 4πρT²/c²
There is no “gravity” between the “sun” and “planets” and that means: The force F = 0
And not F = - G m M/r²
Yes I am saying that astronomers have no clue what they see using their telescopes
What I am saying is that there is no F = - G m M/r² and there is no solar system where the motion of a planet
around the sun is an ellipse with the sun at the focus of the ellipse.
Mercury
r
θ
Sun
Figure - 1
θ
ψ
Sun
Nahhas said the only magic is an act of kindness of a human to all others!
My act of kindness to humanity is to make humanity aware of the criminals with Nobel prizes and the
idiots with intelligent portfolios!
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the
product
S = m r; State = mass x location:
P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment
= change of location + change of mass
= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate
F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force
= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r
= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate
F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r
(1)
= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/m r) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)
= [-G m M/r²] r (1) -------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law
Page 8
Proof:
First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)
Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t
= r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]
= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)
Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ;
And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1)
And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1)
Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t
= r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t
γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r)
And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0
With m = constant, then
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2
From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0
Then r²θ' = h = constant
Differentiate with respect to time
Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0
Divide by r²θ'
Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0
And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]
Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0
Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t
And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0
Page 9
Sun r
r s Mercury
r1 r0 r m
X1 r2
X2
Earth
In mathematical form: r1 = x1 + r s
And r2 = x2 + r m
Then r2 - r1 = x2 - x1 + r m – r s
Or, r = r0 + (r m – r s)
Page 10
And d r m/d t = d r s/ d t
í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e
The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
And d r m/d t = r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] e
í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
And d r s/ d t = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] e
And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = [(r m 0/ r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]
Is: [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
= [(r m 0/ r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
Page 12
And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] = [(r m 0/ r e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]
Is: [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
= [(r m 0/ r e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = 43
r m 0
r s 0
M M M Mercury S Sun
r m 0 r 0
Is: r max = r 0 + (r m 0 +r s 0 )
And r min = r 0 - (r m 0 +r s 0 )
And c = (r max -r min )/2 = r m 0 +r s 0
This establishes visual ellipse of semi major axis a, and a semi minor axis;
And h = 2 π a b = 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)
Areal Velocity is: 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T
Mercury
r
θ
Sun
Figure - 1
Page 15
θ
Ψ
Sun
Ψ ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees
And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days
If we stand in the middle of the street and watch a car moving directly away from us
we see as if the size of the car shrunk. If we take a picture of the car at different
distances then we see that the pictures of the car look like as if the car contracted in
size. The further the car away from us the smaller image of the car in the picture. The
size of the
car did not change but real time light data reflected from the car and ran through air
and into our eyes changes the real time image of the car to indicate a different location
of the car and not a different size of the car. Our eyes see real time images of a moving
car. If the car stops, then the image of the car freezes. A picture or a snap shot of a
moving car is a frozen image of the moving car. When a car moves its real time image
change size but the car does not change size. The car as a moving object at different
distances has a variable real time image that our eyes see in real time and depends on
distance and motion as perceived by our eyes. In short statements
Our eyes see objects in real time as different objects at different distances and different
speeds. Or, our eyes see real time objects we call images that change when measured
from different distances or when moving. Our eyes do not see actual objects but
Images of actual objects and our eyes see different images of same actual objects
when at different distances of moving
In mathematical form:
1 = 1 self evident
2 = 2 is self evident
Image = image = I is self evident line - 1
Object = object = O = self evident line - 2
And, - Object = - objects = - O = self evident line - 3
I=I line - 1
O=O line - 2
And, - O = - O line - 3
Adding: line - 1 and line - 2 and line - 3
I + O – O = O + (I – O) line - 4
I = O + (I – O); O – O = 0 one left side
(I/O) = (O/O) + (I – O)/O; dividing by on both sides line - 5
Or, (I/O) = 1 + (I – O)/O; O/O = 1 line - 6
(I/O) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(I – O)/O] θ’0 Line - 7
If we try to measure the angular velocity of planet Mercury around the sun θ’0 from
planet Earth and not from the Sun a visual effect (error) of
[(I – O)/O] θ’0 is measured that Einstein’s call time travel
(I/O) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(I – O)/O] θ’0
Quantum = classical + relativistic
What we see = what is + visual effects
Real time object = event time Object + time delay object
Real time astronomy = event time astronomy + time delay astronomy
If we try to measure an object θ’0 we see it as (I/O) θ’0 and the difference
accumulation:
Is [(I – O)/O] θ’0 = visual effects
And the accumulation is
[(R0 - R)/R] δθ’0
And Planet Mercury angular velocity space travel
Is δθ’0 = (2π x 5.82 x 106 /88x 24x3600) x (36526/88) (180/ π) (3600) = 70.75
And Arabs 10th century correction to idiot man of the 20th century Einstein
Is: [(R0 - R)/R] δθ’0 = [(5.82 x 106 - 149.6 x 106)/ 149.6 x 106] x
(2π x 5.82 x 106 /88x 24x3600) x (36526/88) (180/ π) (3600) = 43.0 arc second per century
Another method is the product method
If two objects going in two different orbital paths around the Sun and one with speed v*
m = planet Mercury Orbital speed around the Sun and one with speed v* e = Planet Earth
orbital speed around the Sun; then the cross multiply is: (v* e - v° e/v m + v° m) δθ’0 = [(29.8
– 0.465)/47.9 + 0.465] (70.75) = 43
Buzz off Einstein
Then came the big Banger
The big Banger said that: r = r
And r = r + 0
And r = r + (r0 - r0)
And r = (r - r0) + r0; dividing by r0
Then: r/r0 = 1 +(r - r0)/r0
And: n λ /n λ 0= 1 + (n λ – n λ0)/ λ0
Or, λ/ λ0 = 1 + (λ – λ0)/ λ0 = 1 + Z
This quantity [(λ - λ 0)/ λ 0] = Z = Red Shift is a measure of a different is an indication
of a different location and not of an expanding Universe to claim big bang
Distant r, λ
Lab r0, λ0
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Lab λ0 will have a different value Lab λ0 when measured from a distant.
What Lemaitre confusion is distance Illusion expansion of [(λ – λ 0)/ λ 0] r0 when he tried
to measure r0
Nahhas confession to these two: “I am real timer and I am a proud American redneck
and yall Idiots; Big Bang and Time Travel is a purely western stupidity”