Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2011 0310 LakeTapps MngmtPlan Overview Draft2
2011 0310 LakeTapps MngmtPlan Overview Draft2
During the public process, participants recognized that there are a number of issues on Lake Tapps that
need to be addressed. However, it is important to note that because of current funding constraints and
the inability to establish leads to take on additional responsibility, not all issues identified in the Plan can
be addressed or resolved at this time. This draft Plan, which is a working document, is just a first step
towards improving management of the lake, starting with the 2011 recreational season.
Email: comments@enviroissues.com
Stakeholder participation 5
Historic use 12
Location 15
Conclusion 36
Appendices 37
Acknowledgments
The success reached with the final Collaborative Plan Cascade Water Alliance
for Managing Lake Tapps (Plan) and the collaborative • Lloyd Warren, Board Chair
nature of the development process for this Plan could not
• John Marchione, Board Vice Chair
have been accomplished without valuable participation
• John Ault, Board Director
from key organizations, agencies, and individuals. The
dedication to a shared vision for improving life on and • Jon Shimada, Capital Projects Director
around Lake Tapps will help maintain the same character • Penny Sweet, Board Director
of the lake that people have come to know and enjoy. • Chuck Clarke , CEO
• Elaine Kraft, Intergovernmental and Communications
Special thanks and appreciation should be extended to
Director
the many people involved in developing this Plan, who
volunteered their valuable time, effort, and expertise to • Joe Mickelson, Lake Tapps Operations Manager
this important process. • Denice Trimble, Legal Counsel
• TC Richmond, Legal Counsel
Pierce County
• Pat McCarthy, Pierce County Executive East Pierce Fire and Rescure
• Dan Roach, Pierce County Council District 1 • Jerry Thorson, Fire Chief
• Sgt. Roger Toles, Pierce County Sheriff’s Department • Karlyne McGinnis, Fire Commissioner
• Kathy Kravit-Smith, Pierce County Parks Department • Rick Kuss, Fire Commissioner
• Keri Rooney, Pierce County Executive’s Office
• Greg Stonack, Pierce County Sheriff's Department Valley Regional Fire Authority
• Jake Greger, Pierce County Sheriff's Department • Stan Laatsch, Fire Chief
• Larry Minturn, Pierce County Sheriff's Department • Eric Robertson, Administrator
• Sean Kadow, Pierce County Sheriff's Department
Homeowner Associations and Community
City of Auburn Representatives
• Mayor Peter Lewis • James Premo, Tacoma Point and Top Foods
• Carolyn Robertson, Government Relations Manager • Jason Carroll, Tacoma Point
• John Clarke, Tapps Island Association
City of Bonney Lake • Justin Nimick, Driftwood Point
• Mayor Neil Johnson • Kim Stallcop, Driftwood Point
• Dan Grigsby, Public Works Director • Rick Fardig, Homeowner
1
Executive summary
To be written and added once the Plan has been finalized. Approximately 2 pages.
2
Executive summary
To be written and added once the Plan has been finalized. Approximately 2 pages.
3
Introduction
Planning for the Future The broad goals of the Plan are to:
Lake Tapps is a community jewel enjoyed by thousands • Provide background information about the history and
of people each year. The lake, which serves residential natural resources of Lake Tapps.
and recreational purposes, is an important asset to • Provide a summary of existing conditions, agreements,
nearby cities and counties. facilities, recreational uses and management.
• Provide a basic framework for addressing current
In December 2009, Cascade Water Alliance (Cascade)
issues and future use, protection and management of
purchased Lake Tapps from Puget Sound Energy (PSE)
the natural and recreational resources of Lake Tapps
and became the new owner of PSE’s former White River
to best meet the needs of all involved with the lake.
project, including the lake. Since then, Cascade has
continued to operate and maintain Lake Tapps. The lake • Ensure maximum effectiveness by outlining ways
will be used as a drinking water source in the future. in which Pierce County, Cascade, Tribes, local
cities and the community can work cooperatively
To ensure that Lake Tapps remains a safe, clean and and synergistically to better coordinate efforts and
enjoyable resource well into the future Pierce County, decisions pertaining to issues on, in and around
Cascade Water Alliance, the Cities of Auburn, Bonney the lake, as well as to ensure that policies are
Lake, Buckley and Sumner, and other key governments consistent, complementary and designed to protect the
and jurisdictions who share responsibility for Lake Tapps, recreational and natural resources of the lake.
convened a public process with members of the Lake • Serve as an educational resource for the Lake Tapps
Tapps community to develop a Collaborative Plan for community to better understand how management
Managing Lake Tapps (Plan). occurs on, in and around the lake.
4
Introduction
The goal of the public process was to recognize issues The Collaborative Plan for Managing Lake Tapps will
on and around the lake, develop potential solutions be finalized in March 2011. The Plan will be shared with
to those issues, and identify means of funding those the Pierce County Executive, City Councils, Tribes and
solutions to ensure long-term safety and security for Lake Cascade Board of Directors.
Tapps.
Inside the Plan
A Lake Tapps survey, made available to the public via The Collaborative Plan for Managing Lake Tapps:
email, web, mailings and newspaper, initiated the public ► Provides an overview of the history, physical
process. Information gleaned from the survey included characteristics, and current conditions and
what activities are enjoyed on and around the Lake, what demographics on and around Lake Tapps.
issues are experience while using the lake, and what
► Educates residents and lake enthusiasts about
main issues the public feels should be addressed in a
current rules and regulations on and around Lake
lake management plan.
Tapps.
Following the survey, a Community Forum was held ► Identifies roles and responsibilities for lake
to collect additional feedback from the community management.
concerning issues around Lake Tapps and possible ► Identifies safety, security, water quality and other
solutions for addressing these issues. issues currently present on and around the lake.
► Identifies potential solutions to address current
During January and February, key governmental and issues, including funding constraints.
community partners continued to work with residents, ► Provides proposed mechanisms to assess and
recreational users and the various jurisdictions around improve the plan over time.
the lake to develop a draft of the Plan that would ensure
► Respects taxpayers and ratepayers, and is sensitive
enjoyment of the lake while also maintaining a healthy
to budgetary pressures presently faced by local
and safe environment. All meetings were led by a trained
governments.
EnviroIssues facilitator to ensure neutrality throughout the
management plan process.
The Community’s Role in the Decision
This draft of the Plan is available to the public starting Making Process
in March 2011 and will be presented at a Community The Lake Tapps community has always had a voice in the
Meeting on March 16th. The purpose of the Community way their recreational environment is governed, and these
Meeting is to convey all of the effort put forth by the existing ordinances and regulations have sometimes
working group and to make the draft Plan available for been implemented because of grass-roots community
public comment. action and lobbying for change. Community members
who see a need for amendments to existing regulations
Input from the community played a major role in the should seek to collaborate with the appropriate authority,
creation of the Plan; priorities and values of those who including, but not limited to, Pierce County Council,
live, work and play near the lake are reflected throughout. surrounding City Councils, the Lake Tapps Community
For more information about the Plan process, see page Council, and the Boating Advisory Commission.
X.
5
Stakeholder Participation
6
Stakeholder Participation
7
Stakeholder Participation
The public process to develop the Plan was conducted in just a few short months to ensure that implementable short-
term strategies identified in the final Plan could be put into practice in time for the 2011 recreational season.
7. Community Meeting
March 16, 2011
3. Working Group Meeting #1
January 24, 2011 The purpose of the community meeting was to
explain the efforts of the working group over the
The first working group meeting focused on identifying previous two months and collect feedback from the
the purpose and goals of the Plan and identify public on the draft Plan.
potential strategies to address day-to-day issues on,
in and around the lake.
8
Issues of Concern On, In, and Around Lake Tapps
9
Issues of Concern On, In, and Around Lake Tapps
• Tacoma Point is a gathering place for fireworks and currently dealing with, city and County Council decision
encourages trespassing on private property making processes, HOA management of private parks,
• Understanding roles and responsibilities and management of Lake Tapps’ public parks are just
• User enjoyment – making sure issues are managed a few examples of the breadth of topics covered during
in such a way that ensures people’s right to enjoy the the working group meetings. In order to develop a
lake is upheld management plan that meets the needs of the community
and everyone involved, it was important for the working
• Water level – those with low dock levels suffer when
group to truly understand the complexities and convoluted
the water level is too high
nature of managing a lake of this size and with this much
• Water quality community importance.
• Wildlife, animal and habitat control including geese,
nutria, eagles and osprey For a full list of issues and strategy recommendations put
forward in this Plan, see page X. To learn more issues
Following acknowledgement of all Lake Tapps issues, the and strategies that were ultimately deemed too broad or
working group focused their efforts on expanding upon complex for the scope of this Plan, please see Appendix I.
both issues and strategies that were suggested during the
Community Forum and worked to appropriately match the
two together. Prioritization of issues and strategies was
necessary to develop the central focus of the Plan, and
as such, the working group was tasked with tackling a list
of difficult questions – Which issues could be realistically
considered as part of the Plan? Are there issues that
could be addressed in the short-term? Are some issues
so broad in scope and funding requirements, or require
changes to existing laws, that they could only be
addressed in the long-term? Do some issues, in general,
fall outside the scope of this Pan? What strategies can
adequately address existing issues? Which issues
and strategies require funding and is funding currently
available? If not, is obtaining funding a realistic objective?
Who should take on the responsibility of implementing a
strategy identified in the final Plan?
10
Inventory of Existing Conditions
Location
Lake Tapps is located in Pierce County, Washington, The largest public access area on Lake Tapps is LTNP,
approximately 30 miles southeast of Seattle. The located on the northern shore. Operated by Pierce
lake is just below the Pierce County northern border County, it is an 80-acre park with 10,000 feet of waterfront
with King County and lies just to the northwest of Mt. access to the lake. A second public access area is located
Rainier, Washington’s largest mountain. Lake Tapps is at the southern end of the lake, managed by the City of
bordered by the City of Bonney Lake to the south and Bonney Lake. This park, known as Allan Yorke Park, is a
unincorporated Pierce County to the east, with the cities 32-acre facility with 600 feet of waterfront access to the
of Auburn and Sumner immediately to the west. Part of lake. More detailed information regarding the public parks
a plateau created during the glacial period, Lake Tapps is available in the Roles and Responsibilities section,
used to be four separate natural lakes prior to damming in located on page X. The east side of the lake has the
1911 creating the Lake Tapps reservoir. Fed by the White largest concentration of small islands and snags, making
River, Lake Tapps has an irregular shoreline and contains it a somewhat isolated in-water area due to its unique
several small islands scattered throughout. characteristics.
11
Inventory of Existing Conditions
12
Inventory of Existing Conditions
13
Inventory of Existing Conditions
typically around 542-543 feet, with a full recreational pool with many residential parcels having private docks
level of 541.5 feet (USGS, 2001). and retaining walls.The lake has a very high shoreline
development index, which is the ratio of the lake’s
Formed during the glacial period and situated in a shoreline length to that of a circle within the same area.
geologically active region, hazards facing Lake Tapps In addition, several of the island roadways are connected
include flooding, seismic activity and landslides, similar with bridges and causeways. There are several narrow
to the surrounding region. The slopes of Lake Tapps water passages across which it is easy to connect land
are classified as steep slopes and therefore present masses. In the jurisdiction of Bonney Lake, there are
the potential for erosion (Pierce County Shoreline residential boat ramps on 11% of waterfront lots, with boat
Inventory and Characterization Report, 2007). In the City canopies on 18% of the lots. In total, more than 90% of
of Bonney Lake, approximately 29% of residential lots residential lots are armored with bulkhead. This significant
are in a geologically hazardous area, while 10% are in shoreline modification and high shoreline development
the floodplain. (City of Bonney Lake Shoreline Analysis index usually indicates that a lake is more susceptible
Report). Please see Appendix IV for more detailed to eutrophication. Water quality and habitat issues are
information on the Shoreline Analysis Report. discussed in more detail in the Roles and Responsibilities
section.
Residential development around Lake Tapps over the
past half century has caused shoreline modifications,
178TH AV
168TH AV E
50TH ST E WE W
170T
ST ES
T 50TH ST E 50TH ST E
51ST STCT E TA TA
H AV
SN
SN
P 193 P 193
PS R D AV PS R D AV
230TH AV E
230TH AV E
A
A
E
CT CT
G IS
G IS
D E D E
E
R R
E E
19
19
175
175
LA
LA
SO SO
197
19N7D
3
U U
N
191
191
TH TH
T
DD
T
THDR
HA
HA
TA TA
AV
AV
AVCT E
AVCT E
H AV
S
P P PSMARY MA R
RE
PS
AVE E
TA
TA
VC
VC
187TH AVCT E
DR E
V CT
V CT
TE
TE
E E RE
185TH
E
56TH ST E 56TH ST E
183RD AV E
183RD AV1E
NO R
NO R
19
19
195
195
192
192
57TH ST E 57TH ST E
5
5T
TH
TH IS
TH IS
58TH ST E 58TH ST E
HA
TH
TH
Official Official
231ST AV E
231ST AV E
N
ND
AV
DA
ER-TAPPS HWY E
60 60
VE
E
PL
PL
190T
T T
AV
59TH ST E 59TH ST E
90T
H H
E
LAN
LAN
AV
AV
190T
190T
Lakeridge Lakeridge
VE
ST ST
DR E E
E
E DR
E
Junior Junior
RD
RD
E
187T
187T
E E
CA D CAD ST E
H AV
DD
CA S CA S
189TH
189TH
H AV
H AV
SOU
SOU
High High
AVC
3
Hills Hills
23
23
Lake Lake
RE
RE
H AV
H AV
CT E
Zoning Map
Zoning Ma
Elementary
E Elementary
TE
TH IS
T
E
H ISLA
20
20
AVCT
AVCT
21
21
E E
E
63RD ST E 63RD ST E
7
D D
3
3
TH
TH
Tapps Tapps
R R
LAND
TH
TH
181ST AVCT E
181ST AVCT E
AV
E
ND D
AV
AV
D AD
195TH AV E
195TH AV E
64TH ST E RA
183RD AV E
183RD AV E
194TH AV
194TH AV
E
C
R
188T
188T
DR E
TE
TE
BU
BU
RE
RA
WE
WE
AV E
AV E
LN
C
C
KL
KL
MP
H AV
H AV
ST T
ST T
EY
EY
185TH
185TH
SR
-T
E
E
19
19
E
APP
APP
41
AP
AP
BARKUBEIN RD E
BARKUBEIN RD E
2
2N
67TH ST E 67TH ST E
0R
238TH AV
238TH AV
ND
PS
PS
La La
E
E
DA
SH
SH
Printz Printz
PN
AV
AV
HW
HW
AV
ke 67TH STCT E
ke 67TH
69TH ST E STCT E
VE
ST E
1
69TH E
WY
WY
180T
180T
TH
D D
E
Basin Basin
E
eb 68TH ST E
eb 68TH ST E
8
8
E MC
E
DR E
DR E
21
21
H AV
H AV HE
r aJ r aJ
70TH ST E 70TH ST E
M
CG
LAKE
E
E ED
HE
MYERS RD E
MYERS RD E
VA
VA
R
72ND ST E 72ND ST E TE TE
RCH
RCH N
N
193RD AV E
193RD AV E
D
188TH AV E
188TH AV E
190TH AV E
190TH AV E
R3 Overlay R3 Overlay
222ND AVCT E
222ND AVCT E
74TH ST E 74TH ST E
ER
ER
73RD ST E 73RD ST E
TE
CHU
CHU
Lake Lake
AVC E
AR
T
AV E
207TH AV E
Park Park
TC
75TH ST
Bonney 75TH ST
Bonney76TH ST E
K
K
208TH AV E
208TH AV E
76TH ST E
RD
RD
HS
75TH ST E 75TH ST E
ST
E E
76T
171
77TH ST E 77TH ST E
CT E
CT E
TE
191ST AV E
TE TE
HS HS
C
224TH AV
17
17
H ST E T T Residential/Conservation District
Residential/Conservation
(RC-5) Distric
AV
AV
77 77 RD E RD E
222ND AV E
222ND AV E
6
IE IE
PRAIR AIR
TH
TH
197TH AV E
197TH AV E
TH
TH
ST E E ST E TE S S PR
ST NELL NELL
AV
AV
80TH HS
5
80TH
5
CO N CO N
170TH AV E
H
79T 79T
19
19
21
21
171S
E
1T
1T
Bonney Bonney
CHURCH LAKE RD E CHURCH LAKE RD E
185TH AV E
185TH AV E
183RD AV E
183RD AV E
179T
179T
H
EV
EV
80TH ST E 80TH ST E
3
LOCUST AV E
LOCUST AV E
AV
AV
E
184TH AV E
184TH AV E
RG
SR
RE
RE
AV E
82ND ST E 82ND ST E
189TH AV E
189TH AV E
188TH AV E
188TH AV E
E
4
186TH AV E
186TH AV E
82N
E
EN
181ST AV E
E
S TC
182ND AV E
182ND AV E
224TH AV E
224TH AV E
HW TE HW
DR
DR
Y Y
Y Y HW HW High-Density Residential (R-3) High-Density Residential (R-3)
1 1
E E Y Y
LE LE KELLY LAKE RD E KELLY LAKE RD E
CK CK (20 units/acre) (20 units/acre)
BU BU
R- R- Fennel Fennel
NE NE C reek C reek 86TH ST E 86TH ST E
230TH AV E
230TH AV E
MAIN STREET
234TH AV E
189TH AVCT E
Future Future SUMNER-BUCKLEY HWY E SUMNER-BUCKLEY HWY E Commercial (C-2) Commercial (C-2)
D
I RMAIN
AV E
W W
YH YH 90TH ST E 90TH ST E
& Light Manufacturing (C-2/C-3)
& Light Manufacturing (C-2/C-3
ELH
E 91STCKLE
Pierce Pierce CK L 91ST
-BU 203RD R-B
U ST E 203RD
AV E 91ST ST E ST E 91ST ST E
NER
181ST
181ST
229TH AV E
93RD ST E 93RD ST E
227TH AV E
227TH AV E
198TH AV E
E 198TH AV E
Swiss Swiss
226TH AV E
226TH AV E
E
204TH AV
205TH AV
204TH AV
205TH AV
206TH AV E
206TH AV E
Park ST E
94THPark 94TH ST E
93RD ST E 93RD ST E
AV E
AV E
202ND AV
202ND AV
196TH AV E
210TH AV E
210TH AV E
ST E 95T ST E 95T
RD
RD
H H
209TH AV E
209TH AV E
ST E ST E
E
203
203
E
E
E
226TH AVCT E
226TH AVCT E
208TH AV
k
97
97
ree
ree
3 3
T
T
H
H
192ND AV E
192ND AV E
ST
ST
181ST AVCT E
181ST AVCT E
233RD AV E
233RD AV E
el C
el C
nn
SR410 E SR410 E
VE
Fe
H H
HA
PL E
H AVPL E
T T
99 99
TE
99TH2. See
Ordinance 1077 2. See Ordinance 1077
TH
221ST AV E
221ST AV E
E E
TE
TE
220TH AV E
220TH AV E
7T
99TH STCT E E
TE TE
4 4
AV E
STCT
T
ST ST
RE
RE
E
7
227TH AVCT E
227TH AVCT E
190TH AV E200 AV E
200 AV E
AVC
AVC
TC TC
219TH AV
H AV
VE
VE
17
17
H H
100TH STCT E 3. See Hearing Examiner Report
3. See and
Hearing Examiner Repor
S S
201ST AVC
201ST AVC
202ND AV
202ND AV
DD
10 10 10 10
9TH
TA
TA
TH
TH
184TH AV E
184TH AV E
TH
TH
102ND ST E 102ND ST E
Findings, May 26, 1998, Bonney
Findings,
Lake
May 26, 1998, Bonney
225TH AVCT E
225TH AVCT E
219T
229T
ST E ST E
AN
AN
103RD 103RD LA
S
LA
199
199
229TH AVCT
229TH AVCT
22
181
181
14
224TH AV E
224TH AV E
185TH AV E
PA 102ND STCT E
ISL
ISL
OD O MA T E MA
WO TE WO
Y
TE TE Determination 2002-04. No
Determination
Rezone 2002-04. No Rezo
214TH AV E
214TH AV E
198TH AVCT E
198TH AVCT E
HS S SO 103RD DSTCT E
SO 103RD STCT E
E
19 ANGELINE RD E
ING ING
SK
SK
HS HS T H DR ENTWHISTLE RD E ENTWHISTLE RD E
228TH AVCT E
T
R 104 PR 104 U R
E E U
ANGELINE RD
6T 6T SP
AV E
AV E
223RD AV E
10 10 E LA H TH ST E L
PR A PR
E RI AI RI 106TH AST
Bonney Lake Bonney Lake IR E 106TH ST E
4. See Ordinance 1340 4. See Ordinance 1340
E
T TA
AV E
234TH AV E
180TH
180TH
T A RI
210TH AV E
210TH AV E
185TH
185TH
TE
VE
VE
231ST
E
H ST E H ST E
189TH AV E
189TH AV E
E E
H AVCT E
H AVCT E
DA
DA
C
TH 109T 109T
AV E
AV
AV
107TH STCT E E E
234TH
107TH STCT E
E
AV
AV
7 107TH ST E 107TH ST E
VCT E
VCT E
108TH ST E 108TH ST
H AV E
2N
2N
DR
10 E
VCT E
TH
H
AV E
AV E
PAN PAN
TH
TH
5T
OR A VA O VA
Community Development
Community Development
19
RAM
VE
VE
AV E
AV E
LL
4TH
MA V E
22
22
N N E
77
A109TH ST 109TH ST E
HI
B B
17
Inventory of Existing Conditions
Land Use and Land Ownership Due to the economic downturn over the past few years,
The land around Lake Tapps was undeveloped for boat registrations have decreased, although an official
decades, operating solely as a hydroelectric plant for survey of boat usage on Lake Tapps has not recently
energy needs outside of the immediate area. It was an been conducted to provide statistics on the matter. The
area of abundant wildlife with only a few vacation cabins City of Bonney Lake released a Shoreline Analysis
until development started occurring after an investment Report in June 2010 that provided a glimpse into the land
group purchased Puget Power property around the use elements surrounding Lake Tapps. The Residential
lake in 1954. By the early 1990s, more than 78% of the Shoreline Assessment Unit indicates that 99% of the
shoreline and islands were developed for residential shoreline land is zoned for residential purposes, with 89%
purposes and the property values around the lake zoned for R-1 purposes with 4-5 units per net acre. The
reflected the prized opportunity for waterfront living. In Bonney Lake comprehensive plan calls for an additional
May 1998, PSE conducted a survey indicating that the 1% to be used as Conservation/Open Space zoning.
number of occupied waterfront lots had increased to
1,572, approximately 96% of the total platted waterfront The majority of Lake Tapps shoreline is under the
lots. Boat use on the lake has followed a similar trend jurisdiction of Pierce County Zoning. Zoning is mostly
with increased usage throughout the past decade, with moderate density single family (MSF) and agricultural
a similar survey in 2003 estimating that there are 2,604 resource land (ARS).
total on the lake.
15
Inventory of Existing Conditions
Demographics and Social Usage participate in the public process toward creating the lake
management plan and Cascade will work closely with the
Communities at a glance city into the future to ensure continued involvement in
Located in an area of abundant natural beauty, Lake issues regarding Lake Tapps.
Tapps is an area known for prime waterfront real estate.
The land around the lake is predominately zoned for Cascade Water Alliance
moderate to high density single-family residential use. Cascade Water Alliance is a non-profit corporation
The islands on Lake Tapps are also mostly used for large- comprised of eight municipalities (the cities of Kirkland,
lot single family homes. There are several communities Redmond, Bellevue, Issaquah and Tukwila; Sammamish
and HOAs located around the lake that offer private Plateau Water and Sewer district, Covington Water
access. District and Skyway Water and Sewer District) in the
Puget Sound region. Cascade’s mission is “to provide
Auburn water supply to meet current and future needs in a
The City of Auburn is located in King County. The cost effective and environmentally sensitive manner
southern portion is located in Pierce County, yet the City by purchasing wholesale water from other suppliers;
plays as significant a role because of its proximity to the coordinating conservation and supply management;
lake. Auburn is one of the four cities to sign an agreement acquiring, constructing and managing water supply
with Cascade that ensures water needs of the next 50 infrastructure and fostering regional water planning to
years. To see the agreement, see Appendix IV. provide water for people, fish and fun.” Cascade does
not expect to develop its municipal water supply system
Bonney Lake within the next two decades.
The City of Bonney Lake was established in 1946 and
has seen a population increase over the past decade Since purchasing the lake from PSE in December of
from 9,687 in 2000 to a population of 17, 374 in 2010. 2009, Cascade owns the lake up to an elevation of 545
Based on the 2010 Shoreline Analysis Report released feet. Cascade is committed to working with its neighbors
by the City of Bonney Lake, there are 465 residential in the White River basin to ensure continued stewardship
waterfront parcels in Bonney Lake located on Lake Tapps and regional cooperation in the community. Page 11
and approximately 28 vacant parcels. Allan Yorke Park shows the jurisdictions surrounding the lake, including
provides public access to the lake, while there are two Cascade’s land ownership. As part of this cooperation,
private parks, Church Lake Park and Inlet Island Park. Cascade entered into a Lake Tapps Area Water
The City has a total of 211 acres of shoreline jurisdiction Resources Agreement with the above cities on the 5th of
on Lake Tapps. February, 2010.
To view the 2010 Bonney Lake Shoreline Analysis Report, Lake Tapps Community Council (LTCC)
see Appendix IV. The Lake Tapps Community Council, which focuses
their efforts on addressing community challenges and
Buckley works collaboratively with jurisdictional entities that have
Located to the southeast of Lake Tapps, the City of responsibilities on and around Lake Tapps, is made up of
Buckley is home to 4,354 residents as of 2010, a slight seven homeowners associations that represent specific
increase from 4,145 in 2000. With the diversion dam areas around the lake. They are:
located along the White River in Buckley, the city’s • Church Lake Maintenance Co.
stake in Lake Tapps is substantial. Like Bonney Lake • Driftwood Point Association
and Auburn, the Buckley community was invited to
• Inlet Island Maintenance Co.
16
Inventory of Existing Conditions
Pierce County
The second most populous county in the state of
Washington, Pierce County has seen a significant
population increase from 700,819 in 2000, up to 795,225
in 2010. Lake Tapps is located completely within
Pierce County, which oversees the overall health and
management of the lake. The Lake Tapps North County
Park is operated by the Pierce County Parks Department.
The main enforcement team on the lake is operated by
the Pierce County Sheriff’s Department Marine Services
Unit. The involvement of Pierce County in the public
process was therefore crucial to a collaborative and
comprehensive approach to the management plan.
17
Roles and Responsibilities On and
Around Lake Tapps
18
Roles and Responsibilities On and Around Lake Tapps
Lake Tapps North Park Issues of inappropriate or illegal behavior at the park are
Lake Tapps North Park is operated by Pierce County to be handled by the Pierce County Sheriff’s Department.
Parks and Recreation and under the enforcement of the Dikes
Pierce County Sheriff’s Department. The park is a highly The roles and responsibilities regarding dikes on Lake
popular swimming and boat launch area. Problems of Tapps are spread across multiple authorities and
overcrowding and parking issues are addressed in the jurisdictions. Regulation of the structural integrity of
2005 Boat Management Plan. A variety of improvements the dikes is the responsibility of the Washington State
have been implemented since 2005, including an Department of Ecology Dam Safety Office (http://www.
improved boat trailer parking area, two new boat landing ecy.wa.gov/programs/wr/dams/Contacts.html), and falls
docks, a boat wash off area, and adjustments to improve under the State Dam Safety regulation. As the owner
traffic flow around the boat launch area. For the 2011 of the dikes, Cascade plays the lead role in structural
season, the park gates and boat launch will be closed on maintenance and is also charged with determining uses
Wednesdays and Thursdays from May to September 30, for the dikes. This is consistent with 1954 Deed and 1958
2011. Regular park hours are 7:30 a.m. – 8:00 p.m. all Easement. Policing and security of the dikes is enforced
other days. by either the Pierce County Sheriff’s Department or the
Bonney Lake Police Department, with each jurisdiction
Per Ordinance No. 2008-93, parking and launch fees having its own criminal code.
went into effect on May 16, 2009. A $7.00 vehicle parking
fee and $15.00 boat launch fee are charged per daily Legally authorized access to the dikes, all of which are
visit. A combined annual boat launch and parking pass owned by Cascade, is limited only to users and uses
can be purchased for $75.00 (Pierce County residents) authorized by easement and licenses. Cascade is
or $150.00 (non-residents). Please see the following reviewing its policies on leases and licenses for the dikes
Pierce County Parks and Recreation website for more and on signage and trespass enforcement.
information: http://www.co.pierce.wa.us/pc/services/
recreate/LakeTapps.htm As owner of the dikes, Cascade is willing to enter into an
agreement with an entity for the use of the dikes for public
recreation so long as such entity is capable of fulfilling
operational, maintenance and security responsibilities
and could ensure that the structural integrity of the dike
would not be compromised. The dikes offer opportunity
for increased public access and therefore are a potential
asset to the surrounding communities.
Boat Speed
The Pierce County Watercraft Regulations were amended
under Pierce County Code 8.88.460 to make it unlawful to
operate any vessel in excess of 60 mph on Lake Tapps.
Enforcement of the Pierce County Watercraft Regulations
falls under the jurisdiction of the Pierce County Marine
Services Unit (PCSD-MSU) and the Bonney Lake Marine
Services Unit (BLPD-MSU).
19
Roles and Responsibilities On and Around Lake Tapps
Floating Debris in 2009. The agreement states that Cascade will maintain
Tree stumps and snags on the bottom of Lake Tapps a Normal Full Pool (542.2 – 543.7 feet) during the Annual
and debris on the surface are an ongoing issue with Recreational Period from April 15 to September 15. In
complexity surrounding which authority is responsible 30 years, or the start of Cascade’s use of Lake Tapps for
for its clean up. In the 2005 Boat Management Plan municipal water supply, whichever comes later, Normal
(Appendix IV) it was decided that a Lake Watch Program Full Pool will be extended until September 30. See
be set up in order to monitor and manage the issue Appendix IV to review Cascade’s lake level agreement.
of floating debris on Lake Tapps. At this time, there
is no jurisdiction or authority responsible for floating Mandatory Boater Education
debris management. The existence of floating debris The 2005 Boat Management Plan suggested that Pierce
is a reminder that boating safety should remain the top County Council, Bonney Lake City Council and Lake
priority, especially during the summer season when Tapps Community Council support a statewide mandatory
activity on the lake is at its highest level. Exceeding boater education requirement. The Washington State
the speed limit is not only prohibited by law, but is Mandatory Boating Safety Education Law went into effect
recommended to reduce risk of damage to water vessels January 1, 2008. Boaters are now required to pass a
from floating debris in the lake. boating safety course or equivalent exam and to obtain a
Boater Education Card before operating vessels with 15
The issue of floating debris can cause boating navigation hp or greater. The law is being phased in according to the
issues and may complicate rescue and recovery table below:
operations on the lake. Individuals are encouraged to
take caution and personal responsibility while boating and
swimming in Lake Tapps. All boat operators 35 years
January 1, 2011
old and younger
Habitat All boat operators 40 years
Fish and wildlife habitat in and around Lake Tapps January 1, 2012
old and younger
is under the authority of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
All boat operators 50 years
Service and the Washington State Department of Fish January 1, 2013
old and younger
and Wildlife. Existing regulations include federal law
such as the Endangered Species Act and the State All boat operators 60 years
January 1, 2014
old and younger
Wildlife statutes. The National Marine Fisheries Service
is responsible for salmon habitat in the White River. All boat operators 70 years
January 1, 2015
Cascade’s water rights proposal had to demonstrate that old and younger
conservation restrictions would be placed on streamside
and adjacent lands in the White River watershed to January 1, 2016 All boat operators
support salmon and other wildlife. Necessary mitigation
strategies were part of the agreements settled with the
Tribes, the Lake Tapps Community and other interested Enforcement of the Washington State Mandatory Boating
parties to ensure adequate White River flows and habitat Safety Education Law is the responsibility of Marine
protection. Service Units (MSU) on Lake Tapps; including the PCSD-
MSU and the Bonney Lake Police Department MSU
Lake Levels BLPD-MSU.
An agreement between Cascade and the Lake Tapps
Community regarding recreational lake levels was signed
20
Roles and Responsibilities On and Around Lake Tapps
Noise
Park, and, Pierce County Code 8.88.460 B. A violation of
The problem of excessive noise in and around the lake
any provision of this Section constitutes a Class IV civil
is an issue to be addressed according to location and
infraction under chapter 1.16 Pierce County Code.” Pierce
jurisdiction on and around the lake. For noise complaints
County is currently working on the necessary agreements
on the lake, the PCSD-MSU and BLPD-MSU are
to outline the rights and responsibilities of the County with
responsible for enforcing the Pierce County Nuisance
respect to placing mooring buoys on Cascade property
Code amended by Ordinance 2005-35s to include
(bed of Lake Tapps).
“vessel” to the existing code, per suggestion of the 2005
Boat Management Plan. In addition, boats are required
It was suggested during the public process that current
by Pierce County Code to have proper muffler systems
rafting regulations do not entirely or accurately reflect
in order to avoid loud noise when operating. For more
the community’s perspective on rafting. Those seeking
information on noise ordinances, see Appendix II.
to amend current rafting ordinances need to work
directly with the Pierce County Council. The Pierce
Disruptive noise in the areas surrounding Lake Tapps
County Council is made up of seven individual Council
should be enforced according to specific location by City
Districts with authority over specific areas of the county,
of Bonney Lake Police Department, City of Buckley Police
with District 1 covering Lake Tapps and surrounding
Department, City of Sumner Police Department, City of
communities. In addition, the County’s Boating Advisory
Auburn Police Department, or the Pierce County Sheriff’s
Commission, which is a commission that reports directly
Department. Each city is responsible for enforcing its own
to the Pierce County Council regarding boating issues
ordinance regarding noise and for maintaining regulations
and provides ordinance recommendations, should also be
that meet State standards, although implementing a more
involved in discussions concerning rafting on Lake Tapps.
stringent noise ordinance is up to the individual cities.
For the most recent ordinance on rafting see Appendix II.
F City of Bonney Lake (COBL) passed ordinance 1366
(BLMC 16.16.025), effective November 25, 2010, that
For more information about how to contact your District’s
reduces noise levels in the southern part of Lake Tapps
Councilmember, visit http://www.co.pierce.wa.us/pc/abtus/
that is within the city limits of COBL. Page 11 depicts the
ourorg/council/contactus.htm or call (253) 798-7777.
various jurisdictions and their boundaries.
Swimming/Drowning Emergencies
Rafting
Swimming in Lake Tapps, which is a glacier-fed lake
Rafting in Lake Tapps, which is defined as connecting or
with water temperatures averaging a chilly 50°F in the
tying two or more boats together, was cited in the Boat
summer, is done at the assumed risk of the swimmer
Management Plan and during this process as one of the
and responsible guardians. Like many activities on the
most contentious issues facing Lake Tapps residents
lake, swimming is an act that should be undertaken with
and regulators. Sometimes occurring just off the shore
extreme caution and personal responsibility.
of homeowners’ property, the parties were potential
hubs of lewd and destructive behavior creating safety,
In the case of emergency, PCSD-MSU or the PCSD Dive
enforcement and noise issues. Over the past six years,
Team will be dispatched. In addition, East Pierce Fire and
laws have been enacted in order to legalize rafting in only
Rescue also maintains a Dive Teams that can respond
one designated area, which is along Dike 4 near the Lake
to emergencies on the lake. Divers hold a minimum of
Tapps North Park. The language of the Pierce County
Open Water, Dive Rescue 1 and EMT Certification and
Code under Ordinance No. 2009-60s reads as, “Pierce
train regularly in Pierce County bodies of water, including
County Code 8.88.460 B. 1. f. – It shall be unlawful to
Lake Tapps. A full-time crew is not designated specifically
raft two or more vessels together in any cover or channel
for water rescue incidents. Crew and staff are dispatched
or within 500 feet of shore on Lake Tapps, except in a
as needed from a station less than half a mile away from
designated area along Dike 4 near the Pierce County
21
Roles and Responsibilities On and Around Lake Tapps
northwest Lake Tapps. Station 4-6 staff will launch Marine are required by the Clean Water Act to also ensure a
4-6 to all water rescue incidents on Lake Tapps. healthy lake. In the future, when Cascade produces
drinking water, it is committed to meet or exceed federal,
Valley Regional Fire Authority, which primarily provides state and local quality standards and will conduct
emergency services to the City of Auburn, has a extensive monitoring before the water treatment facility
mutual aid agreement with the Pierce County Sheriff’s is designed and built – likely in the 2060s or later. In
Department and can provide backup if necessary. general, although not required, Cascade has been
working with the community to determine activities that
In case of an emergency, either on or around Lake Tapps, may have a negative impact on Lake Tapps in the short-
lake users call or dial 911. term and how those activities and behaviors can be
changed to ensure the best water quality for the Lake in
the long-term.
22
Roles and Responsibilities On and Around Lake Tapps
23
Short Term Issues and Strategies
During January and February, the working group Implementation: See Appendix IV to view the lake level
expanded upon the issues and strategies suggested by agreement between Cascade Water Alliance and the
the public. Their efforts were focused initially on what Lake Tapps community. Cascade Water Alliance and
issues were most important to the community and how the Lake Tapps Community Council will educate the
they should be addressed in a lake management plan. community about the lake level agreement in conjunction
Once issues and strategies were prioritized, the working with education about the final Plan.
group began brainstorming necessary level of funding, Funding needs: None
if any, to implement their recommended strategies. By
Lead: Cascade Water Alliance and Lake Tapps
understanding the funding needs, the working group was
Community Council
able to develop funding approaches and assign a lead to
take on responsibility.
24
Short Term Issues and Strategies
Potential funding approach: Raise additional funding Implementation: Cascade is in discussions to grant
through HOA fees instead of taking money from rights to the City of Bonney Lake to Dike 13 next to Allan
current operations. Most boat operators violating noise Yorke Park for City use as expanded park to increase
ordinances on Lake Tapps either live on the lake or are access to the lake. Legally authorized access to the
visiting a resident of the lake. dikes, all of which are owned by Cascade, is limited only
to users and uses authorized by easement and licenses.
Lead: Needs a lead
Cascade is reviewing its policies on leases and licenses
for the dikes and on signage and trespass enforcement.
Issue: Education about current rules and regulations on
Funding needs: Yes; necessary funding not yet identified
Lake Tapps
Potential funding approach: Cascade Water Alliance
Working Group Strategy: Post noise ordinance and
is willing to grant rights to the City of Bonney Lake to
speed limit information at public access points. (See
Dike 13 to expand Allan Yorke Park; City of Bonney Lake
Education strategies).
is willing to fund expansion and maintenance of park
Implementation: Prior to developing or posting new areas on Dike 13; however, maintenance of the structural
signage, conduct an assessment of current signage and elements of the dike such as the bulkhead/seawall
its effectiveness, and develop a strategy for signage remain the responsibility of Cascade. Development of
based on the results of the assessment. Consider
prioritizing information and develop standard signage for
the entire lake.
25
Short Term Issues and Strategies
this joint use agreement is a work in process by the two City of Bonney Lake also provides marine patrols in the
organizations in spring/summer 2011. south end of Lake Tapps within the City Limits, referred
Lead: City of Bonney Lake and Cascade Water Alliance. to as Church Lake. When requested, the COBL Marine
Any other licensed and insured entity that would like Patrol provides support toPCSD-MSU in other parts of
to operate and maintain a dike on Lake Tapps for Lake Tapps. Bonney Lake spends approximately $50,000
recreational purposes should contact Cascade Water each year on park and marine patrols.
Alliance.
Implementation: Requires additional funding.
Issue: Boating
Education of property owners and visitors
Working Group Strategy: Maintain at least 2011 level
Issue: Personal responsibility on, in and around Lake
of marine patrols on the lake (Total Marine Services Unit
Tapps
Overtime Budget allocated to Lake Tapps Patrol Shifts:
$48,360*); aim to return to 2008 funding levels (Total Working Group Strategy: Conduct education about
Marine Services Unit Overtime Budget allocated to Lake boating safety, swimming, boating and alcohol use, and
Tapps Patrol Shifts: $80,300*) when funding was at its lake usage practices and reinforce personal responsibility
greatest. for abiding by current rules and regulations and
contributing to a healthy and safe lake.
*Scheduled shifts, actual amount spent and amount of
hours may be different as the weather causes shifts to be Implementation: Requires education program and
added and subtracted throughout the summer.
26
Short Term Issues and Strategies
someone to fund and implement. Cascade Water Alliance Issue: Cascade operation of Lake Tapps and community
will include education about personal responsibility in all involvement in the decision process
outreach materials pertaining to the Plan. Working Group Strategy: Cascade Water Alliance
Funding needs: None. Board meetings are open to the public and all are invited
Lead: Cascade Water Alliance and HOAs will assist in to attend. Cascade makes decisions regarding operation
disseminating information included in the final Plan. and other ownership issues with respect to the lake.
Implementation: Currently, Cascade provides
Issue: Roles and responsibility announcements of all Board meetings to the Lake Tapps
Community Council and HOAs around the lake and on its
Working Group Strategy: Clearly identify who is website.
responsible for key activities. Include this information in
the Plan. Distribute the Plan or make it widely available. Funding needs: None
Implementation: Provide information about roles and Lead: Any interested members of the Lake Tapps
responsibilities on, in and around the lake in a user community.
friendly and useful format. This should include contact
information for all entities so the public knows who to Issue: Non-Pierce County Park pass policy
call for what. Cascade, Lake Tapps Community Council, Working Group Strategy: Non-Pierce County residents
Pierce County Parks and HOAs will post this information are not paying the non-resident fees for use of the
on their websites. Cascade has reserved space in County boat launch. Some are circumventing the fee
local papers to provide information about the Lake with the help of Pierce County residents, who are either
Management Plan later in the spring of 2011. allowing non-residents to use their addresses or are
Funding needs: None. purchasing passes for non-residents. This means Pierce
Lead: Cascade Water Alliance and HOAs will assist in County budget and Pierce County park user fees bear
disseminating information included in the final Plan. unequal burden of providing park services to non-County
residents.
Issue: Current rules and regulations Implementation: Educate property owners around Lake
Tapps through the Lake Tapps User’s Guide of the local
Working Group Strategy: Clearly identify existing consequences of supporting circumvention of non-Pierce
rules and regulations including boating rules and noise County resident user fees. Lake Tapps Community
ordinance. See page X of this Plan for more information. Council and HOAs can also provide this education
Implementation: Cascade, Lake Tapps Community through their organizations.
Council, Pierce County Parks and HOAs will publicize the Funding needs: None.
Plan and its contents via web and local papers. Develop
a brief Lake Tapps User’s Guide to print and distribute to Lead: Pierce County Parks, Lake Tapps Community
lake users. Council and HOAs.
27
Short Term Issues and Strategies
Coordination regarding Lake Tapps operation Issue: Duplication of efforts – new regulations
and enforcement Working Group Strategy: Be aware of what rules and
Issue: Avoiding duplication of efforts concerning existing regulations exist before writing new ones. Provide list
regulations on Lake Tapps of existing rules and regulations in the Plan. Encourage
planning and enforcing entities to review existing
Working Group Strategy: Ensure consistency between
ordinance and rules and regulations before contemplating
regulating bodies to prevent problems from moving from
new ones.
one area of the lake to another. Educate users on existing
processes in place, including Boat Advisory Council, Implementation: Provide Plan to County and City
Pierce County Council, Cascade Water Alliance Board councils and planning entities.
meetings, City of Bonney Lake. Funding needs: None.
Implementation: Provide narrative in the Lake Lead: County and cities.
Management Plan (located on page X) about how
rules, regulations and ordinances are developed and
implemented. Cascade will provide information on their
website about these processes. Lake Tapps Community
Council and HOAs share this information with their
organizations.
Funding needs: None.
Lead: Lake Tapps Community Council and HOAs.
28
Long-Term Issues and Strategies
Due to the wide-range of issues on and around Lake Issue: Long-term stability of lake levels
Tapps, some strategies were categorized by the working Working Group Strategy: Replace barrier dam to extend
group as long-term; meaning that although the issue reliability and security in the future and to protect fish and
cannot be solved immediately or in the near future, it salmon habitat.
is still a topic of concern that is important to the Lake
Implementation: Requires federal funds. Educate and
Tapps community. Strategies were deemed long-term
inform Lake Tapps community and regional elected
for a multitude of reasons including; limited resources,
officials about the purpose and need to gain support for
scope of the issue, or necessary level of coordination. In
this funding.
addition, many of the long-term strategies simply require
a longer timeline and can only be addressed over an Funding needs: None.
extended period of time. Lead: Cascade Water Alliance, Lake Tapps Community
Council, Tribes, Pierce County, Auburn, Bonney Lake,
As with some short-term strategies, there are also Buckley and Sumner .
long-term strategies that still require a lead to take on
responsibility. In order for the community to function in
a safe and productive manner long into the future, it is Fish and wildlife
important for those with a stake in the health and wealth
Issue: Managing and monitoring of fish and wildlife
of Lake Tapps to participate in decisions processes
and work collaboratively with governing bodies with Working Group Strategy: Support new or existing
responsibility. private organizations to provide “eyes and hands on the
lake.” Could undertake education role, provide positive
reinforcement for positive behaviors, monitoring of
Lake levels activities that support healthy fish and wildlife, lake-wide
cleanup work parties and other activities.
Issue: Long-term flexibility of lake levels
Implementation: Requires support from local entities
Working Group Strategy: Work with US Army Corps of
and tribes to encourage the development and recruitment
Engineers to expand management of Mud Mountain Dam
of members; assistance with setting up non-profit
to include multipurpose operations such as supporting
corporation if requested, information and tools for
necessary water levels year-round, flood control,
education.
instream flows and fish habitat enhancement.
Funding needs: None.
Implementation: Requires federal rule changes and
will need community and political support. Educate and Lead: Needs a lead.
inform Lake Tapps community and regional elected
officials about the purpose and need to gain support for
this change.
Funding needs: Federal funds.
Lead: Cascade Water Alliance, Lake Tapps Community
Council, Tribes, Pierce County, Auburn, Bonney Lake,
Buckley and Sumner.
29
Long-Term Issues and Strategies
Working Group Strategy: Increase non-boat trailer Funding needs: Yes; safety and training costs.
parking around the lake to encourage more access to the Potential funding approach: Increase park user fees.
lake and its shores to non-boat users.
Lead: Needs a lead.
Implementation: Pierce County is currently considering
expanding trailer parking. Inform Pierce County Parks
Department, Pierce County Council and the City of
Bonney Lake about the desire not to increase boat Recreational usage
trailer parking, but rather to increase vehicle parking to Issue: Boating rafting on the lake
encourage more legal access to the lake and its shores to
Working Group Strategy: Consider changing current
non-boat users.
rules and regulations regarding rafting on the lake to
Funding needs: None. allow it in multiple locations. Pierce County Parks is
Lead: Needs a lead. currently pursuing obtaining the necessary rights and
approvals to install buoys in Lake Tapps near Dike 4, as
dictated in the 2008 Boat Management Plan ordinance.
Issue: Access to Lake Tapps and surrounding Dike 4 will be the only location available for rafting.
communities Inform Pierce County Council that a robust public process
Working Group Strategy: Recommend to County did not provide input into the existing ordinance and
and City Councils that the community supports request working with the public in general and the BAC
finishing transportation projects, including pedestrian specifically to address the current rules.
improvements, related to the lake that will reduce traffic Implementation: Requires informing City or County
Council if changes are recommended to current path
forward. Those seeking to amend current rafting
30
Long-Term Issues and Strategies
ordinances should work directly with the Pierce County resident seems ineffective, since no non-county passes
Council and the BAC, which reports directly to the Pierce are being sold. Assess practice and determine a more
County Council regarding boating issues and ordinance effective way to recover non-county fees.
recommendations. Visit http://www.co.pierce.wa.us/pc/ Implementation: Recommend that Pierce County Parks
abtus/ourorg/council/contactus.htm or call (253) 798-7777 Department assess current practices and explore more
to learn more about how to contact Pierce County Council enforceable sales practices. Encourage Pierce County
members. Parks to develop a better way of proving residency.
Funding needs: None. Educate the public that by allowing non-County residents
Lead: James Premo and Justin Nimick, Lake Tapps to County resident passes they are undermining revenue
community members. support for the lake.
Funding needs: None.
31
Long-Term Issues and Strategies
Implementation: Provide narrative in the Lake as needed and to address changing or emerging issues.
Management Plan about how rules, regulations and Group would include the entities represented in the
ordinances are developed and implemented (see page working group for the original Plan and be augmented
X). Cascade will provide information on their website by other representatives as needed. (i.e. state agencies,
about these processes. Lake Tapps Community Tribes, etc.)
Council and HOAs will share this information with their Implementation: Needs agreement among entities to
organizations. participate in this “Lake Tapps Coordinating Group.”
Funding needs: None. Funding needs: None.
Lead: Lake Tapps Community Council and HOAs. Lead: Cascade Water Alliance, Lake Tapps Community
Council and representatives from the lake management
Issue: Coordination and communication to keep the Lake plan working group.
Management Plan current and useful to the community
Working Group Strategy: Develop a Lake Tapps
coordination group to meet on a regular basis (annually)
and on an as-needed basis to monitor and support
progress towards the recommendations in the Boat
Management Plan and the Collaborative Plan for
Managing Lake Tapps, to revise issues and strategies
32
Funding
Economic Climate and its Impacts on Pierce County Sheriff’s Department – Marine
Services Unit
Funding Availability
The PCSD-MSU budget is comprised of two different
Since 2008, local, regional, and state funding revenues
sources, funds obtained from the Washington State
have been steadily declining adding wide spread
Parks, and funding from Pierce County. Vessel
budgetary pressures to not only the City and County’s
registration fees make up the majority of state funding,
pockets but citizen’s pockets as well. Because of this,
while Pierce County funding is received from the General
local jurisdictions with responsibilities on and around
Fund. Since 2008, both funding sources have steadily
Lake Tapps have faced a challenging couple of years.
decreased due to separate reasons. Vessel registration
As with almost all other public agencies in the region,
numbers are down, leaving the Washington State Parks
Pierce County and the nearby Cities have been forced
with limited resources as boat owners seek to keep
to make difficult financial decisions including; cutting
their own personal finances steady. Boating hobbies are
public services, reducing funds allocated for community
often sustained by expendable income and the past few
programs, raising user fees and increasing taxes.
years have seen disposable income spending shrinking
There are widespread examples of how City and County
significantly. Funding from Pierce County is down due to a
governments around the nation are being severely
decrease in property taxes and other revenue sources.
constrained. This national trend of decreased budget
flexibility has hit Washington State locally at both the city
The following graphs represent the Pierce County
and county levels. Budget cuts for both the PCSD-MSU
Sheriff’s Department Marine Services Unit budget in
Unit and Pierce County Parks Department are leading
years 2008 and 2011.
representations of how limited resources can make
significant impacts, specifically to the management of
Lake Tapps.
33
Funding
The Pierce County Sheriff’s Department maintains County addresses in order to purchase the annual pass
primary responsibility to patrol and investigations. The at the discounted rate. The park would see increased
Marine Services Unit is a specialized unit that comes revenues if annual passes sold reflected the actual use of
secondary. With the budget crisis, staffing levels have Lake Tapps North Park by residents and non-residents.
made it difficult to meet even basic responsibilities, and
staffing specialized units with full-time deputies is not As owners of the lake, Cascade Water Alliance has not
a possibility at this time. With the Sheriff’s Department received immunity from the poor economic climate. Since
focusing its resources on primary responsibilities, Cascade activities are funded by collecting rates and
enforcement is not always available to regulate charges from its member, they have been sensitive to
trespassing violations on the dikes, an ongoing problem rate increase. Cascade’s responsibilities specific to Lake
at Lake Tapps. Increased patrol hours at Lake Tapps Tapps include operations, maintenance, planning, and
would only be possible with increased funding by a infrastructure improvements needed for Cascade’s water
minimum of $32,000 to the 2008 amount. transmission and supply system. Because Cascade is
a non-profit corporation that collects revenue from its
Pierce County Parks Department Members, it is important to note that Cascade cannot
Similar funding constraints are visible within the Pierce serve as a source for general government funds.
County Parks Department. To meet 2011 budget
cuts, the Lake Tapps North Park will be closed on In today’s economic climate, it is important to
Wednesdays and Thursdays for the 2011 season. The acknowledge that not all issues pertaining to Lake
Parks Department has seen a decrease in number of Tapps can and will be solved through additional
annual launch passes sold, with nearly all of the passes monetary resources, simply because the resources
being purchased by Pierce County residents, who buy are not available at this time. In an effort to make a
the pass at a 50% discount over non-County residents. Lake Management Plan that is realistic in scope and
It is assumed that non-county residents are using Pierce implementation, the working group kept this notion at the
34
Funding
forefront of their discussions. They worked collaboratively closest proximity to Lake Tapps e.g., homeowners on the
with one another to develop creative solutions that shoreline. Although the goal of establishing a Park District
require minimal public funds and encourage volunteer as a funding mechanism is broad in scope, it is something
partnerships to ensure a safe and healthy Lake Tapps some members of the working group felt the Lake Tapps
environment. community should strive for.
Partnership between home owners, users and the There was an overall agreement and acknowledgement
various jurisdictions will become increasingly more from the working group that additional funding sources
important if the level of funding remains status quo are needed in order to implement all strategies identified
or continues to decline; being creative with funding is in the Plan. However, in light of the existing economic
important; understanding the difficulties of managing situation facing counties and communities across the
budgets and allocating funds to what is most important State, there is a general unwillingness to actively seek
to the community is a difficult, but achievable task with new funding sources at this time.
teamwork and collaboration between multiple interested
parties. Although the current funding climate looks gloomy, it
is important to keep the discussion at the forefront, as
For a more detailed breakdown of Pierce County and City funding opportunities may become available in the near
of Bonney Lake budgets, see Appendix III. future as economies begin to recover.
35
Conclusion
The lake management plan process was neutrally- informed and educated public will result in lake users
convened with the goal of bringing relevant authorities, heeding safety warnings, abiding by existing rules and
local jurisdictions, residents and lake users together to regulations, and will assist in laying the foundation for
develop a balanced perspective on management of Lake an improved lake environment for the 2011 recreational
Tapps. The end of the five month process culminated with season and beyond.
the development of this Plan – inclusive of real concerns
presently faced on and around the lake with realistic and As a result of limited resources or the inability to identify
implementable solutions for addressing those concerns. a lead, some issues and strategies within this Plan will
be difficult to implement by the 2011 recreational season.
The top concerns represented in this plan were informed The Lake Tapps community should not be discouraged
by the public process including; lake levels, fish and by this notion, but should view this as a call to action
wildlife, enforcement, public access, safety, recreational – an opportunity for individuals to get involved and
usage, education of residents and lake users, and invest in their community to make it a safer and more
coordination amongst entities with responsibilities around enjoyable place to live and recreate. The Plan, which is a
the lake. Each of those categories encompasses a working document, is just a first step towards improving
number of issues that the working group felt were most management of the lake. Any and all future endeavors
important to address in the Plan in order to improve lake that aim to build or expand upon this document to make
management and preserve the unique character of Lake future changes on and around Lake Tapps are not only
Tapps. allowed but highly encouraged by all those involved in the
lake management plan process.
Education of lake users and reinforced awareness about
existing rules and regulations was generally agreed
upon as the main strategy and need in the Plan. As
Pierce County’s largest lake, Lake Tapps has several
areas of public and private access that lend themselves
as controllers of capacity on around the lake. Creating
greater awareness through improved or additional
signage on and around the lake was deemed crucial
for maintaining a healthy, safe and fun environment.
In addition, publicizing this Plan as a way to inform
lake users was identified as another chief strategy for
addressing a lack of education on Lake Tapps. Outreach
materials are currently being developed to inform
lake users and encourage personal responsibility in
maintaining a healthy, safe and fun environment for all
residents and lake users.
36
Appendices
► All existing rules, regulations, ordinances and codes reference in the Plan
37