You are on page 1of 12

Three-Dimensional, Flexible

Nanoscale Field-Effect Transistors


as Localized Bioprobes

ANDRES OSORIO SALAZAR


A01014639
Introduction

For many years, nanoelectronic


devices have been used for
interrogating biological systems,
but since now, all work had
been done on planar devices.
We have overcome this
limitation by the integration of a
nanoscale field-effect transistor Schematics of 60° (top) and 0° (middle)
multiply kinked nanowires and cis (top)
(nanoFET) device at the tip of a and Trans (bottom) configurations in
nanowire structures. The blue and pink
silicon wire bent on an acute regions designate the source/drain (S/D)
and nanoscale FET channel, respectively.
angle.
Introduction

The advantages of using 3D structures is that they


exhibited conductance and sensitivity in aqueous
solution , independent of large mechanical
deflections, and demonstrated high pH sensitivity.
Other advantage is that when we modified 3D
nanoprobes with phospholipid bilayers, can enter
single cells to get better information.
Background

Modern means of communication rely on electric fields and


currents to carry the flow of information.
In contrast, biological systems uses ion gradients and
currents, flows of small molecules, and membrane electric
potentials.
Living organisms use a sophisticated arsenal of membrane
receptors, channels, and pumps to control signal
transduction.
Electronic circuits that use such biological components could
achieve drastically increased functionality; however, this
approach requires nearly seamless integration of biological
and manmade structures.
Aim

In order to get the more information about cells, we must first
create a device small enough to be compared to the size of a cell
itself. This kind of technology has been called nanoelectronics,
referring to nano-sized electronics.
Nanotubes and nanowires electrical devices are extremely sensitive
and can be used for the detection of biological markers, or high
resolution recording from the outside of the cell.
3D sensing and recording with the prototypical nanoelectronic
device, a nanoscale field-effect transistor (nanoFET), have not been
demonstrated because almost all examples of these devices are
created on planar substrates.
In this project, we develop a device reliable and usable to get
accurate information about biological cells.
Design

We needed to incorporate two or three cis-linked


kinked units to the tip of the probe forming angles of
60° or 0°.
We examined the size limits of these bioprobes in
terms of the nanowire diameter and length L between
kinks, and we found that probe structures that are
functional are possible for values as small as ~18 and
15 nm, respectively.
These data show that it is possible to create active
semiconductor probes with dimensions smaller than
microtubules in cells.
Fabrication process.

We next designed a brand-new


process to fabricate these
nanodevices that would allow
these probes to be used as
cellular probes.
We made remote electrical
interconnects to the S/D
nanowire arms on ultrathin SU-8
polymer ribbons.
Experiment

We used the hearth cell of the embryo of a chicken.


In order to start the process, we coated the cells with
a silicon-based organic polymer.
We positioned on place individual cells over a
vertical phospholipid bilayer.
Results

Conductance versus-time data initially in gentle contact with a


beating hearth cell showed a sequence of distinct features

Initially, we observed regularly spaced


spikes with a frequency of ~2.3 Hz,
consistent with the beating hearth

After a relatively brief (~40-s) period of


extracellular signals, we observed several
pronounced changes in recorded signals.
The initial extracellular signals disappeared (pink
stars).
There was a decrease in baseline potential, and
new peaks emerged that had an opposite sign,
similar frequency, much greater amplitude, and
longer duration (green stars).
Discussion

When the cell was retracted from the devices, the


intracellular peaks disappeared, but they reappeared
when the cell was brought back into contact.
This process could be repeated multiple times
without degradation in the recorded signal.
When vertical 3D nanoprobe devices were bent into
a configuration with angle q < ~50° with respect to
the cell, or when kinked nanowire devices were
fabricated on planar substrates, we could record only
extracellular signals.
Conclusions

We believe that with this process there are already


clear advantages:
 Electrical recording with kinked nanowire probes is relatively
simple without the need for resistance or capacitance
compensation.
 The nanoprobes are chemically less invasive than pipettes, as
there is no solution exchange.
 The small size and biomimetic coating minimizes mechanical
invasiveness
 The nanoFETs have high spatial and temporal resolution for
recording.
References
 phospholipid bilayers. (n.d.). Retrieved October 30, 2010, from academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu:
http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/biology/bio4fv/page/phosphb.htm
 Cardiac Muscle. (n.d.). Retrieved October 28, 2010, from medical-dictionary.com: http://medical-
dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Cardiomyocyte
 Definitions. (n.d.). Retrieved October 29, 2010, from britannica.com: http://www.britannica.com/bps/dictionary?query=
 Endocytic pathway. (n.d.). Retrieved October 28, 2010, from herkules.oulu.fi: http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514271521/html/x317.html
 Modulation Doping in Semiconductor Nanostructures. (n.d.). Retrieved October 27, 2010, from bccms.uni-bremen.de:
http://www.bccms.uni-bremen.de/en/research/modulation_doping_in_semiconductor_nanostructures/
 Phosphate buffered saline. (2010, April 1). Retrieved October 28, 2010, from protocolsonline.com:
http://protocolsonline.com/featured-articles/phosphate-buffered-saline-pbs/
 Polydimethylsiloxane. (n.d.). Retrieved October 28, 2010, from photonics.byu.edu: http://www.photonics.byu.edu/PDMS.phtml
 Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). (n.d.). Retrieved 10 27, 2010, from carleton.edu:
http://serc.carleton.edu/research_education/geochemsheets/techniques/SEM.html
 Scanning Gate Microscopy. (n.d.). Retrieved 10 27, 2010, from nanodic.com:
http://www.nanodic.com/nanocharacterization/Scanning_Gate_Microscopy.htm
 The Micropipette. (n.d.). Retrieved 10 27, 2010, from sigmaaldrich.com: http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/life-science/cell-
culture/learning-center/cell-culture-videos/the-micropipette.html
 S1. B. Z. Tian, P. Xie, T. J. Kempa, D. C. Bell, C. M. Lieber, Single-crystalline kinked semiconductor nanowire superstructures. Nature
Nanotech. 4, 824-829 (2009).
 S2. W. C. Claycomb, N. A. Lanson, B. S. Stallworth, D. B. Egeland, J. B. Delcarpio, A. Bahinski, N. J. Izzo, HL-1 cells: A cardiac muscle
cell line that contracts and retains phenotypic characteristics of the adult cardiomyocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 2979-2984
(1998)
 S3. T. Cohen-Karni, B. P. Timko, L. E. Weiss, C. M. Lieber, Flexible electrical recording from cells using nanowire transistor arrays.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7309-7313 (2009).
 S4. N. Misra, J. A. Martinez, S-C. J. Huang, Y. M. Wang, P. Stroeve, C. P. Grigoropoulos, A. Noy, Bioelectronic silicon nanowire devices
using functional membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13780-13784 (2009).

You might also like