Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Appellate Brief Robert t Frost vs Lasalle Bank Na Etc Et Al

Appellate Brief Robert t Frost vs Lasalle Bank Na Etc Et Al

Ratings: (0)|Views: 40 |Likes:
Published by winstons2311

More info:

Published by: winstons2311 on Aug 30, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/30/2013

pdf

text

original

 
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALOF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICTCASE NO: 4D09 - 2668ROBERT T. FROST, et. al.,Appellant,v.LASALLE BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FORWAMU MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGHCERTIFICATES SERIES 2007-OA5 TRUST,Appellee,____________________________________/ On Appeal from the Circuit Court of theSeventeenth Judicial Circuit----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MICHAEL JAY WRUBEL, P.A.Michael Wrubel4801 South University Drive, Suite 251Davie, Florida 33028Attorney for AppellantRobert T. Frost
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................................................................ivSTATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS...........................................................1SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ........................................................................9ARGUMENT............................................................................................................12I. The Documents Attached to the Complaint and the Motion for SummaryJudgment Fail to Provide the Appellee, LaSalle Bank, with Standing.........12A. An Equitable Transfer of the Note and Mortgage Was Not Proven........12B. The Appellant Raised the Defense of Standing in a Timely Manner......17II. The Original Note and Assignment of Mortgage Were NeverIntroduced into Evidence at the Summary Judgment Hearing......................18III. Genuine Issues of Material Fact Exist Within the Record............................19A. Preliminary Requirements Which Must Be Met By the MovingParty in Order to Prevail on a Motion for Summary Judgment...............19B. A Genuine Issue of Material Fact Exists Concerning what Entity isthe Holder and Owner of the Mortgage Given by Robert T. Frost..........20IV. The Original Note with a Blank Endorsement Produced for the First Time atthe Summary Judgment Hearing Was Materially Altered from the NoteAttached to the Complaint and Was Provided in an Untimely MannerPrecludingitsUse...........................................................................................21V. Reasonable Inferences Within the Record Support the Conclusion that theEndorsement Signature on the Original Note is an Unauthorized Forgery andthat Robert T. Frost Was denied his Constitutional Right to a Trial on theMerits.............................................................................................................25ii
 
CONCLUSION........................................................................................................30CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE................................................................................31CERTIFICATE OF FONT COMPLIANCE...........................................................31iii

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
pelliott123 liked this
reostait liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->