You are on page 1of 13

European debt crisis

Shashikant Kulkarni shashi1605@gmail.com

In 1958, an organization called European Coal and Steel Community was formed. This evolved into the European Union (EU) which was established by the Maastricht Treaty in 1993. The European Union introduced the euro on January 1, 1999. On this day, 11 member countries of the EU started using euro as their currency. It benefited countries such as

Before these countries started to use the euro as a currency, they had to borrow money at interest rates much higher than the rates at which a country like Germany borrowed. When these countries started to use the euro they could borrow money at interest rates close to that of Germany, which was economically the best managed country in the EU

The rest of Europe, in effect, used Germany' s credit rating to indulge its material desires. They borrowed as cheaply

Also other than the low interest rates, the inflation in the PIIGS countries was higher than the rate of interest.

It means that, if the borrowing rate is 3 per cent while inflation is 4 per cent you're effectively borrowing for 1 per cent less than inflation. You're being paid to borrow

And borrow they did. And the European peripheral countries (PIIGS) racked up enormous amount of debt in euros.' The debt of Greece, currently amounts to around 160 per cent of its GDP. So, other than the citizens, the governments also started to borrow. This helped

Take the case of Greece. A job which now pays 55,000 euros in Germany, pays 70,000 euros in Greece, even with the fact that Germany is a more productive nation. To get around pay restraints in the calendar year the Greek government simply paid employees a 13th and even 14th monthly salary -months that didn't exist. There is more to come. The Greek government categorises certain jobs as arduous. These jobs have a retirement age of 55 for men and 50 for women. 'As this is also the moment when the state begins to shovel out generous pensions, more than 600 Greek professions somehow managed to get themselves classified as arduous: hairdressers, radio announcers, musicians It means more and more borrowing by the government, when they already have so much debt

Take the case of Spain. Spain had the biggest housing bubble in the world. "To put things in perspective, Spain now has as many unsold homes as the United States, even though the US is six times bigger. Most of these new homes were financed with capital from abroad. Spain's real estate debt comes to around 50 per cent of its GDP Every time there are default threats, the European Central Bank (ECB), helps out with a bailout. Since the start of the financial crisis it (the ECB) has bought, outright, something like $80 billion of Greek and Irish and Portuguese government bonds, and lent another $450 billion or so to various European governments and European banks, accepting virtually any collateral, including Greek government bonds

The situation is pretty messy because it is interlinked. Take the case of Germany, which keeps contributing the ECB rescue fund.

In case of Greece, a lot of Germ French banks which have lent m will be in trouble if Greece defa

'The German government gives money to the rescue fund so that it can give money to the Irish government so that the Irish government can give money to Irish banks so the Irish banks can repay their loans to the German banks,

But wouldn't it be easier for the German government to just pay the Germa separately, instead of taking this long and convoluted route?

In 2004, interest rates in Hungary were at 12.5 per cent. This meant borrowing money was extremely expensive, In neighbouring Austria, the banks had started to offer loans and mortgages to their customers in Swiss francs. Rates in Austria, at 2 per cent, may have been lower than in Hungary, but in Switzerland, they were even lower at around 0.5 per cent. Why would Austrians borrow at 2 per cent when they could just as easily borrow at 0.5% per cent? . The same question applied to Hungarians, except that the difference was much bigger. So the Austrian banks, many of which also had branches in Hungary began to engage in the same business there, lending to Hungarian borrowers.

Austrian banks have lent 140% of their GDP to countries like Hungary. Even though Hungary has put in austerity measures and is trying to repay, if there was a blow up, the Austrian government wouldn't be able to save the banks and ECB might have to step in

Swedish banks have also lent a lot of money to Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia, countries which aspire to have Euro as their currency some day When countries go back to their own currencies to print it and repay debt, citizens will be affected.

When a country prints currency in huge quantities, the currency will not remain of any real value. So the citizens of the country will try and move their money to either other assets like gold, or will continue using the euro. This will lead to bank runs, with all the people queuing up at banks at the same time demanding their money back. This, of course, will lead to a lot of banks collapsing

Mauldin and Tepper elaborate on this using the example of Italy.

'Households and firms, anticipating that domestic deposits would be redenominated into the lira (Italy's currency before it started using the euro), which would then lose value against the euro, would shift their deposits to other euro-area banks. A system-wide bank run would follow. Investors anticipating that their claims on the Italian government would be redenominated into lira would shift into claims on other euro-area governments, leading to a bond market crisis. . . this would be the mother of all financial crises,' write the authors,"

Reference Book: ENDGAME By JOHN MAULDIN And JONATHAN TEPPER

eBook Publisher: John Wiley &


Sons

Imprint:Wil ey

Thanks to
Shonalee Biswas
(European debt crisis: Explained in SIMPLE terms)

www.rediff.com (My favourite Portal for the last decade) &


Many Web sites for the images used in this presentation
Shashikant Kulkarni shashi1605@gmail.com

You might also like