Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BRAIN-HAPTICS
CH.Sreekanth
¾ B.Tech (y5it043)
sree_y5it043@yahoo.com
1. Abstract:
Brain plays major role in the human life. Brain instructs all parts of the human system to
do their work. It emits electrical signals and passes to different organs of the body like
hand fingers etc. Nerves are the carries or the conductors of these signals. These signals
can be picked up using electrodes and can be analyzed to know what that signal
represents.
Here we propose a system, which can recognize these signals from the brain, decode
it and perform the specified operation as initiated by the brain and generate the feedback
force. This is to help for those who are partially physically handicap or paralyzed, those
who cant do all things by themselves can do all the things by themselves as their brain is
not in co-ordination with the body. This system picks such signals, amplifies it, converts
it into digital, analyzes it using neural network and generates actuating signals to external
hardware.
2. Key Words:
Haptics, Brain computer interface (BCI), force feedback, Electro-Encephalogram
(EEG).
3. Introduction:
A human –computer interaction device that implements the concept “think and
make it happen without any physical efforts” is called a brain computer interface [3]
A brain- computer interface is a staple of science fiction writing. In its earliest
incarnation no mechanism was thought necessary, as the technology seemed so far
fetched that no explanation was likely. As more and more become know about the brain,
1
however the possibility has become more real and the science fiction more sophisticated.
It is called cognitive engineering.
The last 6 years have witnessed a rapid-growing body of research and technique
development involving detecting human brain responses and putting these techniques to
appropriate users to help people with debilitating diseases or who are disabled in some
way –the so called brain computer interface.
The main difference between BCI technique and those studied in more common
human-computer interface (HCI) task lies in not relying on any sort of muscular response
but only detectable signals representing response or intentional brain activity. This places
increased emphasis on detecting mechanism for finding out if and when the desired
responses occurred.
Some preliminary works [2] is being done on sensing neurons on silicon
transformers and on growing neurons into neural network top of computer chips.
Figure 2 shows a block diagram for the interfacing network with computer. The
signals are received from electrode immersed in cortex region of brain. Electrodes are
2
specially immersed in cortex region because the neurons in the motor cortex become
desynchronized when we plan movements. These movements are called movement
related desynchronization (MRD).
But these signals are tiny rarely bigger than a few tens of microvolts and are often
buried beneath other signals. Fast ADC converts these signals to digital format for
processing in computer.
3
and increasingly available USB 2.0 can poll about 8x faster Conventional microprocessor
such as micro chip’s PIC product line currently have USB 1.1 support in some models
easing development burden and PIC USB 2.0 support is anticipated shortly.
6. Neural Networks:
Neural Network is a massively parallel-distributed processor made up of simple
processing units, which has a natural propensity for storing experimental knowledge and
making it available for use. It resembles the brain in two respects
1. Knowledge is acquired by the network from its environment through a learning
process.
2. Inter-neuron connection strengths, known as synaptic weights, are used to store
the acquired knowledge.
Fig. 3. Shows the block diagram of a human brain. It accepts the stimulus signals from
sensory organs and generates response. A learning algorithm modifies the synaptic
weights of the network in an orderly fashion to perform the learning process and acquire
knowledge.
v1
v2
Inputs Σ x Output
v3
v4
Figure.4 Neuron
4
The back-propagation proceeds by comparing the output of the network to that
expected and computing an error measured based on sum of square differences. This is
then minimized using gradient descent by altering the weights of the network. Denoting
a member of the training set by si, the actual output by yi, and the desired outputs by wi,
the error (the summing square difference over the entire training set) is given by
n n
E=∑ ∑(y i
j − w ij ) 2 - Eqn.2
i =1 j =1
7. Computer interface with hap tic device and force feedback system:
The signal fed to the computer by USB is analyzed and computer is programmed
to interface with hap tic device. The interfacing of the computer with haptic device can be
represented as shown in figure.8.As shown in figure the signals from the brain are fed to
the ADC, which converts the analog signals from brain to digital signals for the computer.
The communication between computer and ADC is through USB. In computer, the
controlling device and neural network gives command to the haptic device for actuating
output and haptic device gives feedback to the user in the form of tactile sensing.
5
Figure 8: Computer interface with haptic device.
8. System representation:
The complete system is depicted in figure 9. The signals from the brain are fed to the
amplifier. These signals are obtained from the electrodes embedded in brain and those
placed on the scalp. These signals are amplified up to the required level and fed to the
feature extractor (sampling and holding circuit).
This feature extractor selects the required signals and fed into ADC. The signals from
ADC are fed to controlling devices.
The application program in computer accepts these signals through USB.
Generated signals are fed to the haptic device connected to the computer.
6
Figure 9: The complete system with computer and haptic device.
9. Limitations:
1. The place where signals are generated, in cortex part of brain in human beings
differs from person to person as each person is capable of reasoning differently
with different intensities.
2. User must be trained well in all aspect in order to work mentally which is a
tougher job.
3. As electrodes are immersed in brain there can be chances of adverse effect, which
can cause severe problem to the user.
4. The limitation of speed always hinders such system to be efficient in their work.
5. This system is helpful only to partially paralyzed people and not for completely
disabled ones as there is no efficient way of feedback
10. Conclusion:
Finally this system is capable of providing the comfort required to the
disabled people to do their desired work. A person in this regard can work efficiently
like all other people.
11. References:
1. www.robots.ox.ac.uk
2. Toby Howard, Brain Computer Interface, Personal computer world magazine
Febuary-99
3. Andrew Wright, Brain Computer Interface, nac_ccc.si.cc.willams.edu.
4. www.haptic-e.org
5. www.forcefeedback.com
6. G.M.Lingaraju, Sandeep.C.Senan “Virtual reality and haptic”,
International conference ICSCI-2004, FEB 12-15, 2004 at Hyderabad.
7. www.sensable.com/community/index.htm
7
8. Workshop on hap tic technology by Sandeep.C.Senan, Sripad Rao and
Shashank.B at JNNCE Shimoga.
9. Shreyas.I.Shrigandha, Prabhanjana.P “6th sense Haptic device” TECHZONE-
2005, JNNCE, Shimoga