Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
PIAC Letter Request TNC Bell Payphones

PIAC Letter Request TNC Bell Payphones

Ratings: (0)|Views: 50|Likes:
Published by Mark Goldberg

More info:

Categories:Types, Letters
Published by: Mark Goldberg on Jan 19, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/19/2015

pdf

text

original

 
 
January 19, 2012Canadian Radio-Television andTelecommunications CommissionOttawa, ONK1A 0N2
BY ACCESS KEY
Attention: Mr. John Traversy, Secretary GeneralDear Mr. Traversy:
Re: The Companies' Part 1 Application - Pay Telephone Rate Increase
The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) and Canada Without Poverty (CWP) by its counsel PIAC isin receipt of a Part 1 Application from Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (BellAliant), Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) entitled "
 
PayTelephone Rate Increase" dated 17 January 2012. The Application cover letter states that it is:"requesting that the Commission grant them the flexibility to increase their pay telephone (payphone)rates from the rates currently applicable to pay telephones that were set in Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-27,
Price cap framework for large incumbent local exchange carriers
."PIAC on its own behalf and as counsel for Canada Without Poverty expects to oppose the Application.However, we note that the choice of procedure chosen by the Companies is not conducive to a full andproper consideration of this matter. In the application procedure, intervenors are limited to one writtenintervention and no reply. The intervention must be filed within 30 days. The Companies may reply.The application raises an issue (payphone service) that has not been extensively reviewed by theCommission since 2004.
1
The market has not developed as anticipated in some Commission decisionsand as well, the use of payphones by the public has also changed to more resemble a social service.PIAC expects to raise issues of social utility of payphones and ideally to introduce evidence of payphoneuse by the public, in particular those persons living on low income. However, commissioning andcompiling this information will take more time than is allotted for intervention. In addition, theCommission and other parties may benefit from an interrogatory round where incumbent wirelineoperators are asked more detailed questions about their payphone services and future plans. Again, thepresent procedure does not allow for this additional information to become part of the record.
1
See Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-47,
 Access to pay telephone service
(15 July 2004). Online:http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2004/dt2004-47.htm
PUBLIC INTEREST ADVOCACY CENTRLE CENTRE POUR LA DEFENSE DE L’INTERET PUBLI
ONE Nicholas Street, Suite 1204, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 7B7
Tel: (613) 562-4002. Fax: (613) 562-0007. e-mail:piac@piac.ca http://www.piac.ca 

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->