Jason A.

Sirmon 1 COMM: 202 Final Course Reflection The course COMM 202 has been enjoyable but challenging. From each class and assignment, I learned something new about the English language and writing techniques. I realize I have made many mistakes in the past! I enjoyed learning the weekly writing tips. The most influential tip I learned was not to use the word that unless it is completely necessary. Now as I proof read my writing, I often remove that. Other concepts that have gained my attention are analyzing my audience, using digital audio formats, and the importance of narrowing down a research topic. I am certain this information will be valuable to me as I complete my formal education and move into the business community. My experience with this class is satisfying, knowing I have raised the benchmark on my performance and credibility when writing. My confidence is stronger moving forward as I face my upcoming research methods course. I better understand how to whittle away at a concept until I debate an argument. I fell into the same trap Dr. Pupcheck did during her thesis paper. I looked for every piece of material I could find for my topic then changed my topic two different times. Seventy-five percent (75%) of the original research I completed was not used in the final draft of the literature review. After I finally narrowed down a working thesis for my paper, the previous material I located did not provide adequate information. With an incorrect or broad topic, you feel the pressure of a daunting and monumental task. Once the topic is formulated, you can arrive at the argument you desire to present or defend. Once you become aware of your reader, you are able to predict the questions they might have allowing you to answer those questions within the content of the paper. It will also allow you to select material suitable for your audience. While most published material is on a six grade reading level, you may have the luxury of using technical words to get your point across. Using statistics and quoting reliable references increases your own credibility with the reader.

Jason A. Sirmon 2 COMM: 202 One of the most enjoyable projects in the class, other than the power point presentation, was the digital audio project on writing for the ear. Being an occasional listener of NPR radio, I have a pretty good understanding of the content produced from the show. NPR is sometimes a pleasant change from the morning-drive-time syndicated broadcast. This was an easier project for me to accomplish for two reasons. First, I just finished an audio project for COMM 210 (Intro to Digital Media), so I was familiar with the software program needed to complete the task and the topic was easy for me. I embedded a portion of the Martin Luther King speech into my podcast and analyzed the non-verbal communication so evidently clear in the video and described how he turned a 16 minute speech into one of the most memorable occasions in history. While wanting to do my best, I was challenged by Dr. Pupchek and my fellow classmates. I have never been so embarrassed from the behavior and disrespect the other students displayed to Dr. Pupchek. I know the younger generation is supposed to be able to multi-task, but they were down right rude. The lack of preparation and attention given by my fellow classmates was offensive and childish. I often had to bite my tongue! For this reason, I am glad the semester has come to an end. Inclosing, I know I have increased my writing abilities by taking the class. The course work and grading was fair but the literature review was challenging and time consuming. Scott Eales was a great help this semester. COMM 202 was the reason for most of our discussions. Every time one of us discussed an issue with Dr. Pupchek, it was shared with the other. I guess us old guys have to stick together!