Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
March 28 Supreme Court Medicaid Oral Arguments Transcript

March 28 Supreme Court Medicaid Oral Arguments Transcript

Ratings: (0)|Views: 2,929 |Likes:
Published by M Mali

More info:

Published by: M Mali on Mar 28, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/10/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xFLORIDA, ET AL. :Petitioners : No. 11-400v. :DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND :HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., :- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xWashington, D.C.Wednesday, March 28, 2012The above-entitled matter came on for oralargument before the Supreme Court of the United Statesat 1:00 p.m.APPEARANCES:PAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ., Washington, D.C.; on behalf ofPetitioners.DONALD B. VERRILLI, JR., ESQ., Solicitor General,Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; on behalf ofRespondents.1
Alderson Reporting Company
 
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
C O N T E N T S
ORAL ARGUMENT OF PAGEPAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ.On behalf of the Petitioners 3ORAL ARGUMENT OFDONALD B. VERRILLI, JR., ESQ.On behalf of the Respondents 39REBUTTAL ARGUMENT OFPAUL D. CLEMENT, ESQ.On behalf of the Petitioners 792
Alderson Reporting Company
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
Official - Subject to Final Review
P R O C E E D I N G S(1:00 p.m.)CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: We will continueargument this afternoon in case 11-400Florida v. Department of Health and Human Services.Mr. Clement.ORAL ARGUMENT OF PAUL D. CLEMENTON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERMR. CLEMENT: Mr. Chief Justice, and may itplease the Court:The constitutionality of the Act's massiveexpansion of Medicaid depends on the answer to tworelated questions: First is the expansion coercive andsecond does that coercion matter.JUSTICE KAGAN: Mr. Clement, can I ask youjust a matter of clarification? Would you be making thesame argument if instead of the Federal governmentpicked up 90 percent of the cost the Federal governmentpicked up 100 percent of the cost.MR. CLEMENT: Justice Kagan, if everythingelse in the statute remained the same, I would be makingthe exact same argument.JUSTICE KAGAN: The exact same argument. Sothat really reduces to the question of why is a big giftfrom the Federal government a matter of coercion? In3
Alderson Reporting Company

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->