General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Honest Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc., etal., 933 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Christopher J. Chesney, et al.,Case No. 51-2009-CA-6509-WS/G (6thJud.Cir.Pasco.Cty. 02/22/2010 Stanley R. Mills, Judge).
DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE II
gard to all counts of the Amended Complaint, the Plaintiff‟s claims are barred inwhole or in part, because the Plaintiff‟s Amended Complaint, which was filed on or about March
10, 2010, is unverified and does not include an oath, affirmation, or the following statement:under penalty of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing, and the facts alleged therein aretrue and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. This is in violation of the revised Fla.R. Civ. Pro. 1.110(b) which requires that all complaints which plead foreclosure of residentialreal property filed after February 11, 2010 be verified.
DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE III
With regard to all counts of the Amended Complaint, the Plaintiff‟s claims are barred in
whole or in part, because the Plaintiff failed to comply with the forbearance, mortgagemodification, and other foreclosure prevention loan servicing requirements of either State orFederal law.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION T
COMPLAINTSTANDARD OF REVIEW
In ruling on a defendant‟s motion to dismiss, a trial court is limited to the four corners of
the Complaint, and it must accept all the allegations in the Complaint as true.
Lutz LakeFern Rd. Neighborhood Groups, Inc. v. Hillsborough County, 779 So.2d 380, 383 (Fla. 2dDCA 2000). However, exhibits attached to a Complaint are a part of the Complaint.
Bott v. City of Marathon
, 949 So.2d 295 (Fla 3rd DCA 2007) (“when considering a motion