Professional Documents
Culture Documents
USDA FOREST SERVICE DEVELOPMENT OF THE 2012 LAND MANAGEMENT PLANNING RULE
Provides procedures to amend, revise, and develop land management plans Required by the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) of 1976 Plans set forth desired conditions and guidance for management of National Forest System lands
1982 Planning Rule All existing land management plans have been issued under these regulations 2000 Planning Rule 2005 Planning Rule Injunction by the courts for not preparing an EIS 2008 Planning Rule Injunction by the courts for an insufficient EIS The 2000 rule legally came back into effect, with transition language allowing the Agency to use 1982 rule procedures
Input
Proposed rule informed by 26,000 written comments, a Science Forum, Tribal consultation, 35 public meetings, and 300 blog comments. Released proposed rule and draft environmental impact statement in February 2011. 28 regional forums 300,000 comments FS has reviewed, analyzed and responded to the comments in the development of the final rule. Published in the federal register April 9, 2012.
Emphasis on the importance of proper tribal government to government consultation Include tribes early in the planning process
Youth Caucus
Increase understanding Provide a forum for youth to express their opinions Engage youth in the development of the rule
discrete and diverse roles, jurisdictions, responsibilities, and skills of interested and affected parties the accessibility of the process, opportunities, and information
including Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations, other Federal agencies, State and local governments, individuals, and public and private organizations or entities early and throughout the planning process
Consult
The responsible official shall: honor the government-to-government relationship between federally recognized Indian Tribes and the Federal government request information about native knowledge, land ethics, cultural issues, and sacred and culturally significant sites
Coordinate:
with the planning efforts of federally recognized Indian Tribes, Alaska Native Corporations, other Federal agencies, and State and local governments
Consider:
the objectives of Tribes, Alaska Native Corporations, other Federal agencies, State and local governments opportunities for the plan to address the impacts identified or contribute to joint objectives opportunities to resolve or reduce conflicts
guide the contribution to social and economic sustainability, taking into account:
Social,
cultural, and economic conditions Sustainable recreation Multiple uses that contribute to local, regional, and national economies in a sustainable manner
ecosystem services cultural and historic resources and uses wildlife, fish, and plants; for hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, observing, subsistence, and other activities (in collaboration with federally recognized Tribes, ANCs, other Federal agencies, and State and local governments) opportunities to connect people with nature
Whats next?
FACA Directives including public involvement Implementation
Create a robust dialogue with groups of diverse stakeholders on what should be in a new planning rule.