Art New Zealand

Career Management Louise Menzies at the Hocken

It has been commonplace for some time to see making art as a form of research. Artists work in tertiary institutions and collect PBRF (Performance Based Research Funding) points. But Aucklander Louise Menzies really is the most conscientious of artist-researchers. Her research is deep and detailed, and she brings to light what would otherwise remain obscure or invisible. She has signed off from her residency in Dunedin as the Frances Hodgkins Fellow in admirably geekish style, with an exhibition at the Hocken Library that reveals the extent to which she has made use of that institution’s seemingly bottomless collections.

This is not to say that the exhibition is an encyclopaedic record of Menzies’ research, or that we wade through masses of information. Rather, it is a sparse, distilled summary: at one end, a relatively short video; at the other, three items of furniture, a two-page newspaper spread and a calendar; in between, a series of black-and-white prints. None of it can be ‘got’ straight off the bat, because there is a whole lot of history behind each carefully

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Art New Zealand

Art New Zealand5 min read
Unadulterated Joy Lissy and Rudi Robinson-Cole’s Wharenui Harikoa
Wharenui Harikoa comes from a shared epiphanous moment between lovers: Lissy and Rudi RobinsonCole’s manifestation of a love supreme in the form of a life-size crocheted wharenui (meeting house), a fluorescent woollen beacon transmitting joy to the w
Art New Zealand2 min read
Contributors
Don Abbott, Deputy Editor of Art New Zealand, is the author of Vivid: The Paul Hartigan Story and Elizabeth Rees: I Paint. Janet Abbott is a writer and researcher whose interests include the work of Cecil and Elizabeth Kelly, and Canterbury art. She
Art New Zealand8 min read
We Are Advised Not To Say Residue and Remembrance in the Art of Rozana Lee
In his book Blind Spot, Teju Cole observes the social conditions that caution against retelling history. He writes, ‘we are advised not to say: “1965.” We are advised not to say: “the events of 1965.” We are advised not to say: “in 1965, following a

Related