The O. J. Simpson: Murder Trial

Copyright © 2016 by Ronald Williams.

Library of Congress Control Number:   2016914442

ISBN:   Hardcover   978-1-5245-3973-3

   Softcover   978-1-5245-3971-9

   eBook   978-1-5245-3970-2

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted

in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system,

without permission in writing from the copyright owner.

Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Thinkstock are models,

and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.

Certain stock imagery © Thinkstock.

Rev. date: 08/30/2016

Xlibris

1-888-795-4274

www.Xlibris.com

738638

The O. J. Simpson’s step-by-step murder investigation. Let’s talk about the search warrant. On Monday, Judge Ito returned from a short rest and fishing trip. Now it was time to start the pretrial hearing in the Simpson and Goldman murder case.

Who, what, why, and when, this hearing was about the search warrant of O. J. Simpson’s property and the items that were found and taken by police detectives at the home of O. J. Simpson on June 28, 1994. O. J. Simpson defense team’s argument to Judge Ito was the blood leading from the crime scene, blood dripping outside the fence of Nicole Brown Simpson’s home, and blood found on the Ford Bronco handle leading up to O. J. Simpson’s driveway, and the LAPD crime lists gathered the evidence in a wary way. O. J. Simpson’s defense lawyer told Judge Ito the blood found was old, and the investigation by police was not handled properly. O. J. Simpson’s defense lawyer asked Judge Ito to suppress the search warrant and throw the blood evidence out the O. J. Simpson murder case because of insufficient evidence. The defense team talked about a letter document that was found in O. J. Simpson’s home office. The defense asked Judge Ito to throw the whole murder case out because of the evidence gathered and unlikely of evidence and since no bloody clothes or shoes and no knife or weapon were found for evidence to haul O. J. Simpson to the murder. But Judge Ito made a rule and on kind of the DNA blood evidence. O. J. Simpson will go in front of a jury. The defense team then wanted other evidence thrown out the murder case, the coroner’s report. The defense team told Judge Ito the coroner didn’t do the autopsy right, and the evidence that the coroner gave should be suppressed. The defense asked Judge Ito to make a ruling on the lead investigation into the entering of O. J. Simpson’s home. When O. J. Simpson’s daughter was questioned by police about O. J. Simpson’s whereabouts and when LAPD detectives found the bloody glove in O. J. Simpson’s yard, and they gathered all property items while doing the police search, the defense wanted the search warrant suppressed.

O. J. Simpson’s defense lawyer told Judge Ito the property search at O. J. Simpson’s home was not legal and against O. J.’s right. But according to Judge Ito’s ruling, this part of the search warrant was justified. Judge Ito refused to throw the evidence out the Simpson and Goldman murder trial. Judge Ito said to O. J. Simpson’s defense team, Ruling denied. Next, there were the Ford Bronco and black Bentley cars. The defense asked Judge Ito to throw that evidence out, but Judge Ito’s ruling evidence will stay.

After the defense team talked about all the mistakes made in the investigation at the Simpsons’ mansion during the second conference, the prosecutor turned to talk to Judge Ito and told him of the evidence that was gathered on June 28, 1994, from O. J. Simpson’s home, that the search warrant was justified, and that the LAPD was just doing their job as police handling a murder crime investigation after against judge trial. He would make a ruling on today’s hearing and give his answer on Thursday. Then the defense team came back to talk about the seven searchers at O. J. Simpson’s home, the two vehicles, and the twenty-nine police officers who searched O. J. Simpson’s mansion. The defense lawyer talked about the DNA blood evidence. The defense team gave Judge Ito reasons why the DNA blood and other evidence should be thrown out the trial.

After the defense talked to Judge Ito, it was the prosecutor’s time to give Judge Ito reasons why the DNA blood and other items should stay in the case. The prosecutor and O. J. Simpson’s defense team made their arguments to Judge Ito until it was time to call it a day. That was when Judge Ito told the lawyer on both sides that he wanted to get all the facts out and get the prehearing over so the jury could be picked, and the Simpson trial could get on the way. Then Judge Ito told the lawyer he would make a ruling tonight when he looked over the notes that he had on some of the items that were taken from O. J. Simpson’s home, and he would give an answer on the matter. The judge wanted to know if the lawyer had anything more to say. The court would start Thursday at nine o’clock!

Now when Judge Ito’s court got underway Thursday morning, the news came up that someone from the news media had said there was some bloody sock found at O. J. Simpson’s home, and testing showed blood drops on the sock. Judge Ito was hot about the misstatement that was made. Judge Ito told the court he was so upset about the matter and false misstatement until he was thinking about taking the cameras out of his courtroom, and he was going to send out an order and call a meeting on the news matter. After Judge Ito let out steam, his court got underway. Then O. J. Simpson’s defense team pointed out the news leaks, and they wanted charges bring against whoever was putting out the leak to the news media, and the defense said they wanted the matter to stop so O. J. Simpson could get a fair trial. Then Judge Ito said if he would have to stop the newspeople from coming in to his courtroom, he would because the way this matter happened was wrong to O. J. Simpson in getting justice, and he wanted to see that O. J. Simpson get a fair trial, and the false story about the sock was not true.

After clearing up the matter, the defense team talked more on blood evidence and items took from O. J. Simpson’s home. Then the defense team also asked questions to some of the police who searched O. J.’s home after the police gave their testimony. The defense questioned the police misstatement and how the investigation was handled. The defense wanted to question more LAPD police on the detectives searching of O. J.’s home and how the detectives handled the crime after trying to bring some light on this confusing murder case investigation. The prosecutor talked about the letter that was found during the search of O. J. Simpson’s home that looked like it was a divorce letter wrote by Nicole Brown Simpson to O. J. Simpson then more papers and documents found on O. J. Simpson’s property and how this evidence should stay in the Simpson murder trial. After the prosecutor gave their side of the put on of the trial, the defense called O. J. Simpson’s housekeeper to testify about the day the detectives searched the home of O. J. Simpson and had her run on a VCR to play the Frogmen tape. The housekeeper said the police had her work the top and told her to go to the kitchen, so she did what the police told her.

Then the police sat around the family room and watched the Frogmen tape, but the defense team wanted the court to know the LAPD had said they didn’t watch TV at O. J. Simpson’s home. The defense team talked to Judge Ito about the LAPD police conduct and how the police ransacked O. J. Simpson’s home on June 28, 1994, and how wrong O. J.’s rights were violated. Then the defense team told Judge Ito about the way the police moved and put O. J. Simpson’s picture of his children on the wall in their wrong places and took other items from O. J.’s home, which did not have connection to the search warrant list. The defense team pointed out that the police was only there to just gather things that connected O. J. to blood and the crime, but instead, they went on a fishing trip in O. J. Simpson’s home. After the defense said what they had to say, the prosecutor questioned O. J. Simpson’s housekeeper about her whereabouts in the home the day of the search warrant. The prosecutor asked the housekeeper what did she see and hear. O. J. Simpson’s housekeeper told the prosecutor the same thing as the defense. The LAPD police watched the Frogmen tape the day O. J. Simpson’s mansion was searched by LAPD, and she was told to stay in the kitchen while the search was taking place.

After the housekeeper testified, the defense called another police criminalist, a Mr. Fung, who had searched the yard with a mental detective looking for a knife. On O. J.’s ground, Mr. Fung was asked also about a box with sixteen items in it and who put label on the box. The box with sixteen manila envelopes label and card, a letter written about Nicole Brown Simpson again. After Mr. Fung’s testimony, the defense team said to Judge Ito that the search and taking of items from O. J. Simpson’s home were wrong to O. J.’s property, and the evidence should be thrown out the Simpson murder trial. The defense asked Judge Ito to suppress evidence again. After the defense sat, the prosecutor said to Judge Ito that the search of the property and the taking of the items that were listed on the property search warrant were legal, and evidence should stay. Judge Ito told the defense and prosecutor he had to review his notes, and he would make a ruling if the search warrant in the taking of items that weren’t on the search warrant list was justified. And Judge Ito said he would make a ruling on Friday, then Judge Ito dismissed court until 9:00 a.m. of Friday.

While sitting and watching the news, a report came over the television that someone broke into the office of one of O. J. Simpson’s lawyers and took some records of O. J. Simpson. The report then said the robber then went down the hall in the lawyer building and stole some machine. Now you would wonder who could have pulled off a robbery like this and why the person would want O. J. Simpson’s file. Do you think we will find out who did the stealing from the lawyer’s office?

Friday, September 23, the Simpson pretrial was getting underway. With Judge Lance Ito residing, today he was going to make a ruling if the detectives in search of O. J. Simpson’s mansion were out of line, and O. J. Simpson’s right was violated from police watching the VCR tape and taking some items that weren’t on the warrant list. Judge Ito’s ruling was some of the items would be suppressed. But the blood evidence and search of clothes and some other items were justified. The police had a right to take some of the evidence that were taken, so Judge Ito threw out part of this search, and part of this evidence will stay. Then Judge Ito talked more on the leak and the news media and number of other problems coming to the case but mainly the ruling on the search warrant and false rumor about a bloody sock found at O. J. Simpson’s home with blood on it that matched Nicole’s blood type. Again, the defense team told Judge Ito they wanted charges bring against the prison who put the false misstatement out about the bloody sock.

The defense went on talking about charges and the taking of picture of the twenty-nine officers seating around watching the Frogmen tape at O. J. Simpson’s home when they were there to search for blood evidence. The defense talked about items, such as the box with the manila envelope. After the defense, the prosecutor talked about the DNA evidence, and the police were called to take the item and go through the property of O. J. Simpson. The prosecutor pointed out that two people were killed, and they were looking for item to connect someone to the killing of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. After the prosecutor told Judge Ito they wanted the evidence to stay for the trial, the defense got up and asked Judge Ito to stop the search warrant where the police searched the two vehicles and said blood dropping was on the door handle of the Ford Bronco.

Also, the defense wanted the search warrant’s scope where the police searched O. J. Simpson’s other car, the Bentley. The defense talked about the item found in the Ford Bronco and asked Judge Ito to throw evidence out because the search was not proper, and the conduct of the LAPD police was out of order. Then the prosecutor’s time came, and the prosecutor said to Judge Ito that the search was proper, and the police was looking for things that may connect someone to the killing. The search of the Ford Bronco and Bentley was on the search warrant list. Then Judge Ito asked both sides if they did have anything more to say before he made a ruling on the vehicle and the item took from the car. Judge Ito told the defense and prosecutor to give him a few minutes, so he reviewed some notes on another case before he made a ruling on the search warrant where the vehicle was searched by the LAPD police, Judge Ito then pointed out the facts and said the police had a good reason to search the two vehicles and gather items from the cars, that the search warrant was good. The police was looking for anything with blood on it or item that might have been used in a murder. Judge Ito’s ruling to throw the search warrant out against the vehicle was denied. Then the defense got up and talked some more on the warrant and the search of the two cars, and again, the defense asked Judge Ito to stop the search warrant. The defense told the judge that while the Ford Bronco was parked on the parking lot, someone broke in the Ford Bronco and stole something, then the LAPD police went a second time and searched the vehicle.

The defense said to Judge Ito the prosecutor had all the time ever since June. The judge told the prosecutor he wanted the DNA blood back because they had time to send them for test to the lab and have them back, and he was going home, and over the weekend, he was going to think about the deadline for the DNA blood to be back, and if the blood evidence was not back on time, he was going to throw it out the case. Then the defense argued some more about the news leaks, and they wanted a hearing to find out who was putting the false misstatement out. Judge Ito told the court he was going to get to the bottom of the false rumor that he was ordering a hearing with the news media. Then the defense said to Judge Ito they wanted charges pressed against the guilty party. Judge Ito said he was hot, and he was going to see to it that O. J. Simpson get a fair trial. Judge Ito let the court out, and he would see everyone in court on Monday, 9:00 a.m., and he would give his ruling on a deadline to throw the bloody glove evidence and DNA blood test out the trial. Judge Ito then let everyone go.

On Monday, DNA evidence hearing was delayed. Jurger picking Judge Ito next hearing will be on Tuesday. Now I ask do you think the judge is going to throw all the DNA blood evidence out the trial? Is he going to give the prosecutor a deadline? What do you think the judge’s ruling is going to be? If the bloody glove dropped on O. J. Simpson’s driveway and blood found on the handle of the Ford Bronco are thrown out the trial, do you think the judge would let O. J. go or find some reason to keep O. J. Simpson in jail? What do you think? I can’t wait until the next hearing to find out what Judge Ito’s ruling is on throwing DNA blood evidence out the trial. Judge Ito said he would make a ruling on this part of DNA evidence at the next hearing on Tuesday. Now let’s wait and see what’s going to take place this time since Judge Ito had denied all other rulings in the hearing.

It was Tuesday morning, and the Simpson hearing was underway. After thinking, Judge Ito was to give his ruling about whether to throw the bloody glove evidence and part of DNA blood test for coming back late into the Simpson trial or give the prosecutor a deadline to have the blood test back in time to the court before the trial started. Judge Ito’s ruling was to the defense’s request to throw this part of blood evidence, but the Simpson murder trial denied. He was going to keep this part of blood as key evidence in the trial, and Judge Ito said after thinking about the last DNA blood test, he will let the last blood test come on in the Simpson trial.

Judge Ito said it after going home and looking over the lawyer book. The judge couldn’t find an order that would say he had the power to give the prosecutor a deadline to have the DNA test in the trial in a searching time, so Judge Ito’s ruling was this part of blood evidence will stay in. Then Judge Ito told the court he wanted to do more work on jury selection, but while trying to pick the jurors, a rumor about a new book came in to Judge Ito’s courtroom. The book was written about O. J. and Nicole Simpson’s private life. When he saw the tell-all book, that was when Judge Ito stopped everything. Judge Ito delayed the juror picking until Thursday. The judge told the defense and prosecutor he wanted them to each get the tell-all book and go home and read it. After giving the lawyers his order to read the tell-all book, Judge Ito closed his courtroom down. Then on the news came a report that Judge Ito said the reason he stopped his court was because he didn’t want the juror to know what was in the book. The judge said it might stop O. J. Simpson from getting a fair trial, and upon seeing the tell-all book, O. J.’s defense team asked judge to let O. J. Simpson out of jail on bail for one year until the talk about the tell-all book blew over. But the prosecutor didn’t want to hear that. The prosecutor told Judge Ito, No way. Judge Ito said to the court he couldn’t give O. J. bail with the type of murder charges. Then Judge Ito dismissed his courtroom until they can find out what the court was going to do about the tell-all book. Now I am skeptical about that tell-all book.

Now today after getting the tell-all book problem out the way, a report came across the television saying Judge Ito closed his court doors to the news media and won’t let them come in or the public to avoid news leaks. False misstatement, the report also said Judge Ito told the press he was thinking about the sixth amendment. That is, people shall get a fair trial, and he didn’t care what anyone said. He had tried to be nice out of all those gossips. Then came that tell-all book starting more trouble. Judge Ito didn’t want anyone in the courtroom right now but the defense prosecutor and juror until he can get the book problem solved. Then Judge Ito asked for TV shows, not to show the book or have interview with the author, but some of the TV talk shows said they would do as the judge asked, and some of them said they were going on as plan to interview the author and talk about the tell-all book. Then it was reported that Judge Ito said he was going to keep his courtroom closed a few days until he cooled off, and he got everything in his courtroom in order, and if anyone didn’t like it, they can come and see him up front. It was reported that Judge Ito said he was hot. Then it was reported Judge Ito said he might not let the court doors open until he knew.

The juror was just thinking about honest truth and justice in seeing O. J. treated right and getting a fair trial. Judge Ito said he was still thinking about the sixth amendment, and he wanted all people to keep the sixth amendment in mind. Now what do you think about Judge Ito closing his courtroom down and kicking everyone out but the prosecutor, defense, and juror? After all that had went on against Judge Ito’s order, do you think the judge is being fair. Trying to keep the tell-all book out the hands of the judge and when Judge Ito cooled off, do you think the judge is going to let the news media back into his courtroom or keep his court door closed? I can’t wait to find out. Now while we are waiting for Judge Ito to make up his mind about how he is going to decide on whether he is going to keep the newspeople away and what to do about that tell-all book, let’s go back and study the murder crime and try to find some more clues to the Simpson and Goldman killing. Let’s try to put some pieces together to this murder puzzle. What about witness? The only witness to the murder was Nicole Brown Simpson. If Kato and the dog could only talk, then we would know who, what, why, and when. The murder trial went on about the suspect running in the area. I heard Nicole would jog around the neighborhood a lot. Could someone she met doing her daily running left the stocking, cap, and other glove? What about drugs? Could the suspect and this crime be connected to drugs somehow? Now let’s don’t leave out a jealous lover. Let’s ask if there are private detectives working on the murder case, and have the detectives found out some clues to who might have murdered the two victims? What about the psychic lady? I would like to know, have she looked into the crime and saw something more about who might have been the murderer, and how did they get away from the murder scene without being seen by someone? I ask, could it have been a man or a woman involved? Why is this murder so hard to solve? Let’s talk about how the person might have got away from the murder scene.

Now if the murderer didn’t drive a car of some kind, well, do you think a motorcycle could have been used in the getaway? Let’s look at everything so we won’t miss out on the truth and how this murder happened. I wish Kato could only say something. Don’t you? If Kato somehow could play a part in this murder investigation and to go on, I want to know if the knife or bloody clothes and shoes were not to be found in this murder, will we ever know who was the killer from all the mistakes and doubts in people’s minds? Without evidence, do you think someone will ever come forward and admit to the Simpson and Goldman murder? Now after talking about more clues, let’s move on.

Today after thinking about the problem of the media, it was reported that after cooling off a little bit, Judge Ito decided to let the cameras back into his courtroom. Now I ask are you glad Judge Ito changed his mind about the media? I am. What about you? After getting things back in order, Judge Ito went on with jury selection and more arguments from O. J. Simpson’s defense team, asking Judge Ito to suppress evidence took from the Ford Bronco when the vehicle was broken into by an employee who worked for the tow yard where LAPD police had a haul on O. J. Simpson doing the investigation. While in the vehicle doing the investigation, the employee took some receipt out of the Ford Bronco. Now I can’t wait to see what Judge Ito is going to do about suppressing this part of evidence. Do you think the judge will suppress this evidence when the Ford Bronco was broken into and throw it out the trial?

Now it is October 21, 1919, time to hear Judge Ito’s ruling to throw the evidence out where the Ford Bronco was broken into, but Judge Ito delayed the hearing on kind of more jury selection. Judge Ito reported the next evidence hearing will be held in one week. The defense team again asked Judge Ito to let O. J. Simpson out of jail for one year and put O. J. Simpson under house arrest, but Judge Ito’s answer was no bail, so O. J. Simpson will have to stay in jail until the trial was over. Everything was reported, going just a little slow in jury selection. Then it was reported the prosecutor asked Judge Ito to pick a new jury. The prosecutor claimed some of the jury who were picked were lying just to get on the jury and be part of history. The prosecutor also told Judge Ito that by him dismissing this jury, they would have to worry about what will people think on what the media and that tell-all book said. But the defense came forward then and said to Judge Ito they wanted to keep the jury that was already picked. The defense said to Judge Ito to keep some of the jury whom they think can help O. J. Simpson get a better trial. Then the prosecutor again said to Judge Ito they wanted a new jury because of the new leak and other problems in the case. They didn’t think O. J. Simpson would get a fair trial. But again, the defense said, No way. So Judge Ito sat, and after thinking about kicking the old jury pool out and getting another one, Judge Ito’s ruling was to keep the same jury, so the prosecutor lost that time. Then jury selection went on, and another DNA hearing was set for some time soon.

You know, there is something happening new every day in this murder case. It was reported that more people were talking about the jury, and Judge Ito let part of the juror go because he found out they had been watching TV, reading newspaper, and listening to the radio. Judge Ito also found out a few of them had seen the tell-all book about O. J. and Nicole Simpson’s life. Judge Ito said he gave the jurors an order not to come in contact with anything that had something to do with O. J. Simpson, so Judge Ito had to let those people go. Then last more talk about a will Nicole Brown Simpson had one week before she was murdered. The mystery to the will was the handwritten signature. The question about the writing was if Nicole Brown Simpson didn’t write her name on the will, who else could have signed the name on the will? What do you think? Could someone have signed Nicole Brown Simpson’s name on the will and knew about Nicole’s murder also?

And when this investigation is over, do you think the handwriting on the will was from Nicole Simpson? Did someone sign the will other than Nicole? I want to know. Don’t you? And is there a clue to the will that can connect someone to the murder of Nicole and Ronald Goldman? I would like to know if the handwriting expert came up with the mystery to the will. Also, today a question was asked about O. J. and Nicole’s kids. It was reported that the two oldest were doing just fine. They went and visit their father every day if possible in the Los Angeles jail. It was also said that O. J. Simpson’s two babies, the little boy and girl, whom O. J. Simpson gave Nicole Brown Simpson parents’ guardianship over them, were taken care of by the grandparents. It was reported they were also doing just great, but this time of the year will be hard for O. J. Simpson and family because O. J. and the kids had always spent Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays together, and it was reported that O. J. just wanted to get the trial over so he can go home to his children. So I ask you, what do you think? Should they get that trial over so O. J. Simpson can go to his family or keep O. J. in jail and keep gossiping about him and sticking their noses in O. J. Simpson’s life? Another report on TV said O. J. was kind of sick today and couldn’t come to court, but later, it was reported that O. J. was doing just fine after seeing the doctor and taking medication.

Now after today’s reports, on the O. J. hearing were the four psychics talking about seeing Nicole and Ronald Goldman murdered. One psychic said he had already told Nicole Brown Simpson he saw her having a short life, and the other psychic said Nicole told her in the spirit who murdered her and Ronald Goldman, but the psychic can’t tell the killer’s name. The other psychic said that she saw the murder weapon and clothes that the killer used in the crime and that the person carried the weapon and bloody clothes and put them in a locker in an airport. But now since it’s been so long, someone went and moved the evidence. The knife was thrown in a body of water, and so was the clothes, and the police will never find the weapon or clothes the killer used. The psychic also said drugs was involved in Nicole and Ronald Goldman murder. After seeing the psychic told what they saw about the crime, O. J.’s pal and close friend came on Dateline NBC to tell how they knew O. J. Simpson and how O. J. Simpson was being lied on and made to look like a monster when he was not, and O. J.’s friend said he can’t stand blood, let alone cut a person. O. J.’s friend said he was innocent, and O. J. Simpson didn’t murder his ex-wife and Ronald Goldman.

Now what do you think about O. J.’s friend speaking up for him? Do you think they know O. J. best since they have been around O. J. and Nicole? And today there was another report from the psychic detective lady who had been working on the case with the LAPD. The psychic lady while holding a picture said she saw one person doing the murder, but there were some more people at the crime scene with that person. So I ask, who could be involved, and why did they kill Nicole and Ronald Goldman? Well, we will see when the trial starts and get some answer to our questions. Today the court had picked their twelve jurors. It won’t be long now. I can’t wait. What about you? It was reported that Judge Ito said he got the twelve people he wanted for the jury and was ready to get the show on the road. Now Judge Ito was going to have another camera hearing. After thinking about camera and new coverage in his courtroom, the hearing that Judge Ito was conducting today will let you know the ruling about camera coverage on whether he was going to have camera in the court doing O. J. Simpson trial when it got underway. Now what do you think? Is Judge Ito going to let camera into the courtroom so the whole world can see the O. J. Simpson trial? The attorney representing court TV argued too that Judge Ito should let the camera stay in the courtroom so without a reasonable doubt, everyone can see O. J. Simpson was getting a fair trial, let the world see what was going on in the O. J. Simpson murder trial. After hearing the attorney’s argument asking to keep camera in the courtroom, Judge Ito again talked about the sixth amendment. Then Judge Ito told the court he didn’t like the conduct of the newspeople, and he was the boss in his courtroom. Judge Ito said he didn’t want any more new leaks and untruth out about the O. J. Simpson murder, and he was going to give the newspeople one more time to do right, and if they messed up again, he was going to close his courtroom to everyone. Judge Ito’s ruling then was to keep media and camera coverage in the courtroom. Then Judge Ito said he wanted to move on to hear argument on whether item was taken out the Ford when at the tow yard by the sanction work. Judge Ito will make a ruling on this part of the hearing sometime this week.

After the hearing today, another report came out about O. J. Simpson’s best friend, Al Cowling. Today the DA reported Mr. Cowling wanted to stand trial for helping O. J. Simpson on that day when the police was after the Ford Bronco on the freeway, and O. J. Simpson was talking about killing himself, but Al Cowling stayed with O. J. Simpson all the way until he was in the hand of the LAPD police, keeping O. J. from murdering himself. After hearing the DA’s decision on what they were going to do to Mr. Al Cowling, it was said the court was going to take off for Veterans Day, and Judge Ito would hear argument when they return on evidence that was taken from the Ford Bronco and lost a gas receipt and close receipt belonging to Nicole Brown Simpson. Also, today there were law clerks who worked with Judge Ito in the murder case. The young lawyer helped Judge Ito decide on what was wrong or right in handling hard decision in court cases. That should be a big help to the judge. What about the talk today that Judge Ito’s wife who was a police captain in the LAPD was going to be called by O. J. Simpson defense team to tell what she knew about the detective who found the bloody glove in O. J. Simpson’s yard? The wife of Judge Ito worked with the detective at one time and may have some knowledge of that police detective’s conduct.

Now what do you think about Judge Ito’s wife being called by the defense to testify and tell what she knew about this police? Do you think Judge Ito’s wife is going to be called to testify when O. J. Simpson trial gets started, and do you want to know if the wife has to be a part of this Simpson murder trial? Will Judge Ito still be the judge in hearing the Simpson murder trial, or will some other judge be picked to take Judge Ito’s place? When the court returned after Veterans Day, the hearing that was supposed to take place was delayed, and more judge picking went on. Then a problem took place. A man was put off the jury because the judge found out the man had said he was the one who saved Ronald Reagan two times from being assassinated. Judge Ito let him go real fast after hearing about what was going on. Also, a report came out about another book wrote by a lady who knew O. J. Simpson and Nicole Brown Simpson. The book told that the lady was more of a friend of O. J. Simpson, and also, the lady knew O. J. Simpson didn’t murder Nicole and Ronald Goldman. After hearing about another book, there was a talk about the psychic detective lady who was working on the Simpson case. She went and got some card that O. J. Simpson had signed in jail, and when the psychic lady had the card in her hand, she could tell who murdered Nicole Simpson and Ronald Goldman. After hearing more news from the psychic lady, another man, also a psychic who worked on the murder case with the police, said he went to the murder scene and could feel three people involved in killing Nicole and Ronald Goldman. The psychic man said he could feel two men and one woman who murdered them, and also, the psychic said he saw the knife that the murderers used when he went to the crime scene. Now what do you think? Is there someone else out there that the police should be looking for? And today a report said there were more letters found by the prosecutor that Nicole Brown Simpson wrote to O. J. Simpson, and the letters will be evidence in the Simpson trial. It was also said judge selection was still going on, and Judge Ito was keeping some of the people and letting a few go whom he thought were not going to be good jurors. It was said at last, after a long time trying to pick twelve people to service on the Simpson trial, finally, the court had their twelve people. Now that’s good news, and what about more on the Ford Bronco? It was said the vehicle was going to be sold, and the seller was asking for hundreds of dollars. Now what do you think? Will the person selling the Ford Bronco get the money they want for the car? And what about the statement of a sheriff at the jail saying he heard a statement made by O. J. Simpson to the minister in a loud tone and then threw the telephone down hard on a desk? The jail guard claimed O. J. seemed to be arguing with the minister.

There was a report about the defense trying to get a fast and speedy trial no later than January 1995 if Judge Ito ruled okay. It had also been reported O. J. didn’t want to keep spending taxpayer money setting in jail. He wanted to get the trial over so he can get home to his children and other family. Then it was said the prosecutor wanted the court to know whatever happened, they were set to go on with the O. J. Simpson trial. The prosecutor reported that they had everything they needed as evidence to give to the jury. Some part of the DNA blood test was back, so Judge Ito was going to let everyone go home for the Christmas holiday. Judge Ito told the court he will make a ruling if he was going to throw the statement evidence that the jail guard heard and the fast trial that the defense team wanted for O. J. Simpson after the Christmas holiday. What do you think is going to happen? Will the judge rule to throw the statement out the Simpson murder trial, and what about a fast and speedy trial for O. J. Simpson? I can’t wait. What about you? But that’s not all that went on today. A news report said the woman who wrote the tell-all book about Nicole Brown Simpson and O. J. Simpson’s life had went into hiding in fear of her life after the tell-all book came out. Now she had come out and was going to be a key witness for the prosecutor in the O. J. Simpson murder trial. Do you think the judge will find the woman’s story accountable and true in the tell-all book, or will the juror have doubt in that book also?

Now that the court was going on Christmas leave, the next hearing will be on Monday after Christmas. That was when Judge Ito will make a ruling on things connected to statement between O. J. Simpson and the minister and a fast trial for O. J. Simpson. Now today after a long Christmas holiday, Judge Ito will make his ruling and then hear more arguments about DNA connected to the Kelly-Frye hearing. Now after getting court underway, Judge Ito pointed out the statement that the jailer overheard when he said O. J. was having a visit from the minister, then O. J. hollered at the pastor in a loud voice then threw the jail phone hard down on the desk in the visit booth in the area. Where O. J. and the reverend having a confrontation? Judge Ito said that part of the case will be kept a secret. Well, that is one good thing that had happened to O. J. Simpson and his defense team. Then Judge Ito said he wanted to think some more about a fast and speedy trial, but today he wanted to hear more on the DNA blood test and talk about the Kelly-Frye hearing argument coming from the defense room. First, the defense told Judge Ito they wanted DNA evidence to go on in front of the juror and past the Kelly-Frye hearing. The defense said it would save time and that a Kelly-Fry hearing could take too long. Then the prosecutor said to Judge Ito in an argument that they wanted to keep the Kelly-Frye hearing in the case because of the DNA blood evidence. Judge Ito said he will make a ruling over the weekend if he was going to past the Kelly Fried hearing so the trial won’t take so long. Then the defense team said to Judge Ito that the prosecutor had just gave them new document about Nicole Brown Simpson domestic violence, and why did the prosecutor wait so long in giving them this part of evidence? Now what do you think? Is someone trying to hire something so O. J. Simpson won’t get a fair trial?

After hearing the argument from the defense, Judge Ito said he was going to make on the Kelly-Frye hearing, and then Judge Ito told the prosecutor to watch themselves and give defense the evidence on time from now on, or he will have to do something about their conduct. Now after going home and thinking about the Kelly-Frye hearing during the New Year, Judge Ito came back today with a ruling saying they will go on with the Kelly-Frye hearing. Now what about O. J. Simpson’s getting up and saying to Judge Ito and the court that he wanted to testify in his behalf again the DNA evidence. Then Judge Ito asked O. J. Simpson if he had something else to say to the court. O. J. Simpson said no, then Judge Ito said he was going to call the juror. He was ready to get the trial on the road, so juror, when I call, get ready and pack your bag. Then there were talks about the witness list, and the prosecutor was asked about the woman who wrote the tell-all book about Nicole and O. J. Simpson’s private life. The judge wanted to know whether this person was going to be a witness, but the prosecutor told Judge Ito now she wanted to be called to testify at O. J. Simpson murder trial. Now what do you think about the prosecutor not letting the woman who wrote the tell-all book be called to tell her story? Was there something said in that book that made the prosecutor change their mind about putting this woman on the witness list, and do you think that was good news for the defense team and O. J. Simpson? And what about the prosecutor going to O. J. Simpson’s first wife’s home and trying to get her into court to talk about her marriage to O. J. Simpson, and was there some kind of violence during the time she stayed with O. J. Simpson? The prosecutor was asking the court to have this hearing sometime next month. Now what do you think? Will the court call O. J. Simpson’s ex-wife to tell on O. J.? Let’s wait and see what’s going to take place in this matter.

Today Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Lance Ito was going to give to the jurors their order, the people who were going to see and hear the O. J. Simpson trial. Judge Ito told the jurors that he was going to have the sheriff give them a list of things to bring on the day when they will stay confined in hotel for six months if needed that long for this trial. The judge said the jurors will be moving from hotel to different places every day. Judge ordered the jurors not to bring radio or anything where they could hear outside news about the case. Judge Ito said he didn’t want any more problems like the court had had in the past, like untruth misstatement and other problems. Judge Ito told the jurors he was going to give them a map to a secret place for list of things to bring and not to bring with them on the day to report. Judge Ito said to the juror they will have family visits on the weekend, and they can write letter and make telephone calls. The jurors said this was in for a long stay. After giving the jurors their order, Judge Ito sent them to a room in the court where a sheriff will give them the list of things they were going to need to get thought the Simpson trial. Looked like Judge Ito was under a lot of pressure and just wanted to get this murder trial over. Today after the hearing about the book coming out that O. J. Simpson wrote while in jail, telling about his life with Nicole and the murder that he had been charged with, now do you think this book is going to be a best seller, and will this book be better than the tell-all book that was written about O. J. and Nicole Brown Simpson’s private life, or will the prosecutor tap to use this book against O. J. Simpson in some way when the trial gets underway? I hear