Six Decades of US-Russia Citizen Dialogue: Past Lessons, Future Hopes
()
About this ebook
About Kettering Foundation
The Kettering Foundation is a nonpartisan, nonprofit operating foundation rooted in the American tradition of cooperative research. Kettering’s primary research question is: What does it take to make democracy work as it should? Kettering’s research is distinctive because it is conducted from the perspective of citizens and focuses on what people can do collectively to address problems affecting their lives, their communities, and their nation. For more information about Kettering research and publications, see the Kettering Foundation’s website at www.kettering.org.
Related to Six Decades of US-Russia Citizen Dialogue
Related ebooks
Breaking Barriers in United States-Russia Relations: The Power and Promise of Citizen Diplomacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJust Politics: Human Rights and the Foreign Policy of Great Powers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEntangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in Its Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPrivate Military Companies and the Outsourcing of War: Re-examining the Political Rationale Towards Peace Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreat Decisions 2024 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Transatlantic traumas: Has illiberalism brought the West to the brink of collapse? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Independence to the U.S. Constitution: Reconsidering the Critical Period of American History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsForeign Policy for America in the Twenty-first Century: Alternative Perspectives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEffective Diplomacy in the Twenty-First Century a Practitioner’s Perspective: A Handbook for Diplomatic Officers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe United States and Latin America in the 1990s: Beyond the Cold War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsForeign Powers and Intervention in Armed Conflicts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Good of Politics (Engaging Culture): A Biblical, Historical, and Contemporary Introduction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Is Democracy Possible Here?: Principles for a New Political Debate Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Public Policy Became War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUneasy Neighbo(u)rs: Canada, The USA and the Dynamics of State, Industry and Culture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMoving Forward On the Path of Global Studies: The Selected Academic Works of Bin Xia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn the Hegemon's Shadow: Leading States and the Rise of Regional Powers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn the Nation’s Service: The Life and Times of George P. Shultz Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Soviet Cultural Offensive: The Role of Cultural Diplomacy in Soviet Foreign Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDoes America Need a Foreign Policy?: Toward a New Diplomacy for the 21st Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shadow World: Resurgent Russia, the Global New Left, and Radical Islam Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The End of Grand Strategy: US Maritime Operations in the Twenty-First Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat Uncle Sam Wants: U.S. Foreign Policy Objectives in Australia and Beyond Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy 1957 ed. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreat Decisions 2021 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Grand Strategy for America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnited and Independent: John Quincy Adams on American Foreign Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe World Order: New Rules or a Game without Rules: Putin talks to Valdai Club in Sochi Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Great Decisions 2022 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Superpower Myth: The Use and Misuse of American Might Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Asian History For You
The Last Yakuza: life and death in the Japanese underworld Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of War: Illustrated Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shogun: The Life of Tokugawa Ieyasu Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInglorious Empire: what the British did to India Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Genghis Khan: A Life From Beginning to End Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Climb: Tragic Ambitions on Everest Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Forgotten Highlander: An Incredible WWII Story of Survival in the Pacific Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ghosts of the Tsunami: Death and Life in Japan's Disaster Zone Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the World's Greatest Nuclear Disaster Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Vory: Russia's Super Mafia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dead Mountain: The Untold True Story of the Dyatlov Pass Incident Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-1962 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rasputin: Faith, Power, and the Twilight of the Romanovs Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of Caste (Oprah's Book Club): by Isabel Wilkerson - The Origins of Our Discontents - A Comprehensive Summary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnit 731: The Forgotten Asian Auschwitz Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago: The Authorized Abridgement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of 'brainwashing' in China Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Helmet For My Pillow [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Red Hotel: Moscow 1941, the Metropol Hotel, and the Untold Story of Stalin's Propaganda War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Revolution of the Mind: Higher Learning among the Bolsheviks, 1918–1929 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Anarchy: The East India Company, Corporate Violence, and the Pillage of an Empire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5To Love and Be Loved: A Personal Portrait of Mother Teresa Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 3]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5No Beast So Fierce: The Terrifying True Story of the Champawat Tiger, the Deadliest Man-Eater in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Six Decades of US-Russia Citizen Dialogue
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Six Decades of US-Russia Citizen Dialogue - Philip Stewart
PREFACE
Dartmouth: Looking Forward
by David Mathews
PHIL STEWART, THE DARTMOUTH VETERAN who has participated in every conference for more than a half-century, gives us a lucid and compelling account of what happened and what can be learned from this joint venture. Somewhat like what happens on the space station where there are crews from both countries, Dartmouth doesn’t have an American voice or a Russian voice; it has a blended voice all its own.
Dartmouth is not an organization with offices and a website. It is all the people who participate now and those who have participated in the past 60 years. I am pleased to share the chair of the US delegation with Ambassador James Collins, and we are fortunate to work with very able Russian cochairs, Yuri Shafranik and Vitaly Naumkin, for whom we have genuine respect even when we don’t always agree. The other participants have included leading American and Russian citizens from all major sectors of the two societies. Among them have been former diplomats and scholars with considerable knowledge about the issues being discussed.
In this piece, I want to look to the future. Recently, Dartmouth has turned more to the public. Two examples will explain what I mean. In the last four years, seeing the collapse of many of the people-to-people exchanges, Dartmouth has encouraged new joint ventures around similar and common problems confronting people in both countries. Under the Dartmouth umbrella, there are now two exchanges on health challenges, a collaboration between US and Russian libraries, a new student exchange, and an emerging exchange among religious institutions of all faiths. These have not detracted from the long-term focus on strategic matters but rather complemented the discussions of critical issues, such as avoiding another arms race. And in 2019, Dartmouth addressed the public directly by issuing its first press release, which was based on a jointly prepared statement with recommendations for nuclear policy. Both of these examples responded to what an earlier US cochair—a former assistant secretary of state, the late Harold Saunders—had urged for some time, which was to build constructive relationships between whole bodies politic,
not just governments.
The Kettering Foundation is a research institution that studies, among other subjects, nongovernmental, or citizen, diplomacy. In all of its research, the foundation pays particular attention to public attitudes in the United States on major policy issues, both international and domestic. The findings from these studies have become more relevant as Dartmouth addresses the public directly. One thing stands out in this research: People are deeply concerned about their safety and fear a nuclear holocaust that could destroy the world. They are aware that no rational nation would deliberately start a nuclear war, but they aren’t sure all nations will act rationally.
Going forward shouldn’t mean discarding what past Dartmouth Conferences have contributed. One of the major characteristics of the Dartmouth talks has been a focus on the quality of the relationship between Russia and the United States. In the conferences, the relationship is a third party, and it has to be kept as constructive as possible. Dartmouth has also made a contribution by keeping in mind how the relationship between the two countries affects the rest of the world. That awareness has been an incentive to see what can be accomplished by cooperating in areas where the interest should be mutual—the global environment, for example. Dartmouth has more than a legacy to appreciate; it has a future of possibilities to imagine.
_______________________
CHAPTER ONE
Citizens Meeting
the Challenges of a
Relationship in Crisis
Russian participants in the first Dartmouth Conference flank Dartmouth College president John Sloan Dickey (front row, fourth from left) 1960
CHAPTER ONE
Citizens Meeting the Challenges of a Relationship in Crisis
THE DARTMOUTH CONFERENCE is a distinct and innovative form of citizen diplomacy. For over 60 years, it has developed a unique experience and a unique methodology for involving Russian and American citizens in the process of finding political solutions and compromises to the issues that divide them and threaten world peace. This is what has determined the relevance of the conference in these turbulent times.
In the mid-20th century, the United States and the Soviet Union recognized that neither could achieve security on its own. Trying to go it alone has led only to costly and dangerous arms races. Negotiated limitations on arms, especially nuclear weapons, have played a critical role in preventing war. Even though these two nations often seem at odds on the world stage and citizens of both often view each other with mistrust, they do hold shared interests, such as climate change, pandemics, and the fight against terrorism.
The question is not whether to have a relationship with Russia. We have one and, today, early in the 21st century, it is a very difficult and dangerous one. When official relations limit the ability of our governments to address issues that divide us or explore the potential for cooperation, citizens have a special obligation to engage in dialogue between our nations. Through this dialogue, participants seek knowledge of and understanding by each side about what motivates the other, the values and objectives of each, and how each side sees issues of importance and its global role. The Dartmouth Conference is a forum for open, creative thinking about how to address matters important to each country and to the world, to identify opportunities to cooperate where our interests coincide, and to suggest strategies for managing the differences or disputes that challenge our capacity for constructive interaction.
Both the Russian and US governments have always welcomed the jointly developed ideas, insights, understandings—and, at times, the proposals—that emerge from each session of this dialogue. This brief book tells the story of Dartmouth’s work during its first 60 years and suggests an agenda for its future efforts.
The policies of nations are conducted largely through governmental institutions, but it is the human beings in those institutions who give form and shape to aspirations for these policies. Conflict among states arises when the interests, policies, and actions of one or more states, as shaped and interpreted by the human beings leading them, is perceived by other states as threats to their interests, power, or policies. For 60 years, the participants of the Dartmouth Conference worked in a very turbulent world. Soviet-US relations reached a dangerous point during the Cold War and required enormous efforts on both sides to make the situation safer and more predictable.
Now, despite the past years and accumulated experience, relations between the United States and Russia have deteriorated again. The world is no safer either. It is full of various conflicts—both interstate and internal—complicated by foreign interference. Among them are conflicts in Yemen, Syria, Libya, Ukraine, the Caucasus, Africa, and Latin America. All these conflicts are very difficult to resolve. In this book, we argue for a more productive way to deal with conflicts.
The Idea Was Born
Norman Cousins, editor for 35 years of the Saturday Review, a founder of the antinuclear SANE movement (officially, the National Committee for a SANE Nuclear Policy), and a committed believer that world peace could be achieved only through world government, was the creator and strongest proponent for the idea of a conference that would bring together high-level citizens from the two antagonists of the Cold War. His concept was simple, if grand: to engage citizens from the two major nuclear powers in a conversation on how to prevent a nuclear war.
Building upon a personal relationship with President Dwight D. Eisenhower dating from the late 1940s, Cousins traveled to Moscow with Eisenhower’s blessing in May 1959 and proposed his idea to the Soviet Peace Committee. While his humor evoked laughs, coolness met his harsh criticism of many aspects of Soviet policy, particularly regarding nuclear testing and human rights. While promised a response, Cousins could not have left Moscow with much reason for hope. As long-time Russian interpreter and conference coordinator Alice (Alla) Bobrysheva reported in her own memoir, since this would be the first meeting organized by the Peace Committee with Americans who were not pro-Soviet, the committee leadership was deeply skeptical that this invitation would be accepted.¹ Nevertheless, the request was routed through the Central Committee’s International Department, to whom the Peace Committee reported. One can only imagine, then, the surprised reactions when, in October 1959, the Peace Committee received approval to move ahead with this meeting. Bobrysheva is convinced that this decision was possible only through the personal intervention of Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev. Cousins’ subsequent personal meetings with Khrushchev, as well as a second meeting held just six months after the first, took place at the Crimean resort reserved for high-level party officials. The fact that the resort was located next door to Khrushchev’s own villa indicates the very high level of Soviet interest.
Norman Cousins
In the spring of 1960, as preparations advanced for the first meeting, to be held at Dartmouth College in Hanover,