Scribd
Upload
57 views2 pages

Crosstab Analysis of Sanitation and Prevalence

This document presents the results of a cross-tabulation analysis examining the relationship between sanitation (sanitasi) and prevalence (prevalensi). It found that 47 cases had adequate sanitation and positive prevalence, while 20 cases had inadequate sanitation and negative prevalence. A chi-square test revealed a statistically significant relationship between sanitation and prevalence with a p-value of 0.035. The odds ratio also indicated those with adequate sanitation had lower odds of positive prevalence compared to those with inadequate sanitation.

Uploaded by

fathim zahro
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
57 views2 pages

Crosstab Analysis of Sanitation and Prevalence

This document presents the results of a cross-tabulation analysis examining the relationship between sanitation (sanitasi) and prevalence (prevalensi). It found that 47 cases had adequate sanitation and positive prevalence, while 20 cases had inadequate sanitation and negative prevalence. A chi-square test revealed a statistically significant relationship between sanitation and prevalence with a p-value of 0.035. The odds ratio also indicated those with adequate sanitation had lower odds of positive prevalence compared to those with inadequate sanitation.

Uploaded by

fathim zahro
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N sanitasi * prevalensi 67 Percent 72.0% N 26 Missing Percent 28.0% N 93 Total Percent 100.0%

sanitasi * prevalensi Crosstabulation prevalensi positif sanitasi memadai Count Expected Count tidak memadai Count Expected Count Total Count Expected Count 22 26.0 25 21.0 47 47.0 negatif 15 11.0 5 9.0 20 20.0 37 37.0 30 30.0 67 67.0 Total

Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctionb Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Casesb 4.442 67 1 .035 4.509a 3.441 4.691 df 1 1 1 sided) .034 .064 .030 .059 .030 Exact Sig. (2sided) Exact Sig. (1sided)

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.96. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures Asymp. Std. Value Interval by Interval Ordinal by Ordinal N of Valid Cases a. Not assuming the null hypothesis. b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c. Based on normal approximation. Pearson's R Spearman Correlation -.259 -.259 67 Errora .112 .112 Approx. Tb -2.166 -2.166 Approx. Sig. .034c .034c

Risk Estimate Value 95% Confidence Interval Lower Odds Ratio for sanitasi (memadai / tidak memadai) For cohort prevalensi = positif For cohort prevalensi = negatif N of Valid Cases .293 .092 Upper .939

.714

.523 5.925

.973

2.432 67

.999

You might also like