Scribd
Upload
14 views2 pages

Writer's Autobiography Grading Rubric

This rubric outlines the criteria for evaluating an autobiography of a writer assignment in 3 areas: 1) The final draft is scored out of 5 points based on inclusion of key elements like an interesting opening, strong thesis, meaningful body, and concise conclusion. 2) Spelling, grammar, and mechanics are scored out of 5 points based on the number of mistakes. 3) Drafting process is scored out of 10 points based on inclusion of a rough draft, peer editing, and incorporating feedback into the final draft.

Uploaded by

bobbyhejnal
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
14 views2 pages

Writer's Autobiography Grading Rubric

This rubric outlines the criteria for evaluating an autobiography of a writer assignment in 3 areas: 1) The final draft is scored out of 5 points based on inclusion of key elements like an interesting opening, strong thesis, meaningful body, and concise conclusion. 2) Spelling, grammar, and mechanics are scored out of 5 points based on the number of mistakes. 3) Drafting process is scored out of 10 points based on inclusion of a rough draft, peer editing, and incorporating feedback into the final draft.

Uploaded by

bobbyhejnal
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Author: __________________________________________________________ _________/50

Assignment Total:

Autobiography of a Writer Rubric


Final draft
#5 Essay was above expectations. It included all necessary elements (Interesting opening, strong thesis, meaningful body, and concise conclusion) $5 Essay was partially completed and included most of the necessary elements. Specific areas (flow, imagination, etc.) could have been improved upon. 0 The essay was either not completed or did not ma e sense.

Spelling !rammar and "echanics

$0 "o spelling, grammar, or mechanical mista es.

5 %nly a few mista es were made, and the value of the piece was only harmed in a minimal way.

0 The spelling and grammatical mista es too away from the value of the piece.

$0 ! draft was completed and included with the final draft.

Rough %rafts 5 ! draft was included but only partially completed.

&eer're(ie) &rocess 0 "o drafts were included with the final draft. $0 ! peer editing sheet was included and completed. The author too the suggestions into account when rewriting his-her essay. 5 ! peer editing sheet was included and completed. The author too only a few of the suggestions into account when rewriting his-her essay. 0 ! peer editing sheet was either not included, or the author did not ta e any of the suggestions into account when rewriting his-her essay.

Total: ________ / 50
Strengths of this essay#

$ea nesses of this essay#

%rder of &e'uired (aterials (top)bottom)# &ubric *inal +raft ,eer Editing Sheet

&ough +raft

You might also like