Case 1: Regression analysis between GDP Growth rate (X) &
Unemployment rate (Y)
Hypotheses
Ho: GDP is not significant predictor for Unemployment rate
Ha: GDP is significant predictor for Unemployment rate
Test
Use of regression analysis for the correlation between the variables.
Use of F test & t test for the future predictability at level of significance 0.10.
Data Analysis
Table 6.1
YEAR
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Reliability Test
GDP RATE
7.59
4.3
5.52
3.99
8.06
6.97
9.48
9.57
9.32
6.72
8.39
8.39
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
7.32
7.68
8.8
9.5
9.2
8.9
7.8
7.2
6.8
10.7
10.8
9.4
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Cronbach's
Alpha
Items
Alpha
Based
of
on
Standardize
d Item
.683
.626
From the above table we can say that the data of GDP rate & Unemployment rate are
reliable.
Statistical test
Regression Analysis:
X Y
XY n
X X
2
b
1
Y b1 X
Y X
b n
n
1
From the SPSS Software
Mode
Model Summary
R
Adjusted R Std. Error of
l
Square
Square
the Estimate
a
1
.255
.065
-.029
1.34861
a. Predictors: (Constant), GDP
ANOVAa
Sum of
df
Model
Squares
Regression
1.260
1
1
Residual
18.187
10
Total
19.447
11
a. Dependent Variable: unemployment
b. Predictors: (Constant), GDP
Mean
Square
1.260
1.819
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Standardize
Model
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
Sig.
.693
.425b
Sig.
d
Coefficients
Beta
(Constan
9.972
1.606
t)
gdp
-.176
.212
a. Dependent Variable: unemployment
-.255
6.208
.000
-.832
.425
Y b0 b1 X
where :
= the sample intercept 9.972
b = the sample slope - .176
1
Y = the predicted value of Y
They are forming following regression equation as mention below
Y
9.972 - .176
Where X = GDP rate
Y = Unemployment rate
Coefficient Of Correlation = -0.255
Coefficient of Determination = 0.065
Statistical Conclusions
As p value is greater than 0.10, null hypothesis is accepted.
Implications
GDP is responsible for the 6.5 % variation in the unemployment for the past data but as
our null hypothesis is accepted this correlation & regression model may not be true for
the future prediction.