Cyrano de Bergerac
()
About this ebook
Edmond Rostand
Born in 1869, Edmond Eugène Alexis Rostand was a French poet and dramatist. He is associated with neo-romanticism, and is best known for his play Cyrano de Bergerac. Rostand’s romantic plays provided an alternative to the naturalistic theatre popular during the late nineteenth century. Another of Rostand’s works, Les Romanesques, was adapted to the musical comedy, The Fantasticks.
Read more from Edmond Rostand
Cyrano de Bergerac Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCyrano de Bergerac An Heroic Comedy in Five Acts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cyrano de Bergerac Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Chantecler Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChantecler Play in Four Acts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cyrano de Bergerac: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cyrano De Bergerac Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCyrano de Bergerac Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCyrano De Bergerac: A Play Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Chantecler: Play in Four Acts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCyrano de Bergerac Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCyrano de Bergerac (Translated by Gladys Thomas and Mary F. Guillemard with an Introduction by W. P. Trent) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Cyrano de Bergerac
Related ebooks
Cyrano de Bergerac (Translated by Gladys Thomas and Mary F. Guillemard with an Introduction by W. P. Trent) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Borgias Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Complete Celebrated Crimes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCelebrated Crimes (Complete) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCelebrated Crimes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDaisy Miller Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Celebrated Crimes (The Borgias, The Man in the Iron Mask, The Cenci, Massacres of the South, Mary Stuart and many more) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTravels through France and Italy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daisy Miller (with an Introduction by Martin W. Sampson) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Doomsday Men Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fortune of the Rougons Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Celebrated Crimes: Complete Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCasanova's Life and Times: Living in the Eighteenth Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCyrano de Bergerac: An Heroic Comedy in Five Acts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuotes and Images from Celebrated Crimes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Scarlet Pimpernel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Travels through France and Italy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAbbé Aubain and Mosaics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFive Classic French Plays Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Travels Through France and Italy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Masterpiece Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Acrobats and Mountebanks Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmphitryon or The Two Sosias: "Dancing is the poetry of the foot." Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOld Junk Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Assignation: “It is easier to forgive an enemy than to forgive a friend.” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCaptain Pamphile by Alexandre Dumas (Illustrated) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Tremendous Event Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Voyage to the Moon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTwo classic novels ESTP will love Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Slave of the Lamp Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Performing Arts For You
Romeo and Juliet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Science of Storytelling: Why Stories Make Us Human and How to Tell Them Better Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Quite Nice and Fairly Accurate Good Omens Script Book: The Script Book Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Hollywood's Dark History: Silver Screen Scandals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Becoming Free Indeed: My Story of Disentangling Faith from Fear Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Diamond Eye: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hamlet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Storyworthy: Engage, Teach, Persuade, and Change Your Life through the Power of Storytelling Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes: Revised and Complete Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How I Learned to Drive (Stand-Alone TCG Edition) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Best Women's Monologues from New Plays, 2020 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The World Turned Upside Down: Finding the Gospel in Stranger Things Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Dramatic Writing: Its Basis in the Creative Interpretation of Human Motives Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lucky Dog Lessons: From Renowned Expert Dog Trainer and Host of Lucky Dog: Reunions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Count Of Monte Cristo (Unabridged) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Comedy Bible: From Stand-up to Sitcom--The Comedy Writer's Ultimate "How To" Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wuthering Heights Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Trial Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Coreyography: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mash: A Novel About Three Army Doctors Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5For colored girls who have considered suicide/When the rainbow is enuf Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Strange Loop Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unsheltered: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fifth Mountain: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Midsummer Night's Dream, with line numbers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Slave Play Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Woman Is No Man: A Read with Jenna Pick Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Is This Anything? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Cyrano de Bergerac
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Cyrano de Bergerac - Edmond Rostand
CYRANO DE BERGERAC
By EDMOND ROSTAND
Translated by GLADYS THOMAS and MARY F. GUILLEMARD
Introduction by W. P. TRENT
Cyrano de Bergerac
By Edmond Rostand
Translated by Gladys Thomas and Mary F. Guillemard
Introduction by W. P. Trent
Print ISBN 13: 978-1-4209-7575-8
eBook ISBN 13: 978-1-4209-7742-4
This edition copyright © 2021. Digireads.com Publishing.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law.
Cover Image: A detail of Man with long nose, possibly Cyrano De Bergerac
(coloured engraving), English School (19th century) / Private Collection / © Look and Learn / Bridgeman Images.
Please visit www.digireads.com
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
DRAMATIS PERSONAE
ACT I
SCENE I
SCENE II
SCENE III
SCENE IV
SCENE V
SCENE VI
SCENE VII
ACT II
SCENE I
SCENE II
SCENE III
SCENE IV
SCENE V
SCENE VI
SCENE VII
SCENE VIII
SCENE IX
SCENE X
SCENE XI
ACT III
SCENE I
SCENE II
SCENE III
SCENE IV
SCENE V
SCENE VI
SCENE VII
SCENE VIII
SCENE IX
SCENE X
SCENE XI
SCENE XII
ACT IV
SCENE I
SCENE II
SCENE III
SCENE IV
SCENE V
SCENE VI
SCENE VII
SCENE VIII
SCENE IX
SCENE X
ACT V
SCENE I
SCENE II
SCENE III
SCENE IV
SCENE V
SCENE VI
Introduction
The critic of literature has no more difficult task than that of appraising properly a work that has achieved current success to an eminent degree. Such a work needs no interpreter or introducer, because it has already introduced itself. It does not lend itself readily to calm judgment, both because the critic is liable to be influenced by the same enthusiasm that has affected the general public, and because, on the other hand, if he has not been so influenced, he is likely to be overanxious to prove his own independence, and is thus in danger of becoming captious and unjust. Yet it is obvious that if there be any good in criticism, successful authors, who presumably will become still greater public benefactors, ought to get the benefit of it, while the reader who is in danger of being misled by his enthusiasm should be set straight at once. Hence contemporary criticism of all books, successful or unsuccessful, is practically indispensable, and hence it is that even Cyrano de Bergerac,
fascinating though it be, cannot escape the common fate of being weighed in the balance.
That it should have tipped the balance in both directions since its production at the Porte St. Martin theatre in Paris, in December, 1897, was to be expected. It was welcomed with a warmth which probably neither its talented author, M. Edmond Rostand, nor its chief actor, M. Coquelin, fully anticipated; it was translated for foreign readers and adapted to foreign stages; it was pronounced a masterpiece by critics of established repute. But less flattering opinions were also heard. Here in America, for example, the most promising of our younger dramatic critics, Mr. Norman Hapgood, writing in the Bookman for November, 1898, did not hesitate to declare that the drama was to him on the stage what it had been in the reading,—an extremely clever proof of skill, a brilliant show of execution, a series of scenes exactly calculated to exhibit the powers of a strong and versatile French actor,—all this, but without simplicity, inevitableness, deep sincerity, without, in short, any true greatness.
Four months before, the editor of the Nineteenth Century had permitted one of his contributors, Mr. Stanley Young, to assert that not even Shakespeare has given us a hero that appeals to us as Cyrano,
and that if we search the whole range of Corneille, Racine, Molière, Victor Hugo, or any other French dramatist,
we shall find nothing on a higher level.
Which of these two judgments is the correct one, or does not experience teach us rather that neither judgment is likely to be entirely correct and that we shall do well to seek a safe stand between them? However this may be, it is quite certain that we shall be on sure ground if we say something about the author and his subject before attempting to discuss the play.
M. Edmond Rostand was born in Marseilles, about thirty years ago. His youth was evidently filled with literary ambitions, for he had a drama, Les Romanesques.
accepted by the Théâtre Français, by the time he was twenty-three, and he had, two years previously, as nearly all French authors seem to do, published a volume of verse. Indeed, as he has just told us in his testimony relative to the amusing suit brought by a Chicago gentleman to prove that Cyrano
was plagiarized from The Merchant Prince of Cornville,
the subject of his greatest play had been in his mind from his college days, so that it was no mere haphazard undertaking that was encouraged and finally accepted by M. Coquelin. Meanwhile another great favorite of the Parisian stage, Mme. Sarah Bernhardt, had shown her appreciation of our author’s talents by accepting La Princesse Lointaine
and La Samaritaine
—neither of them great successes, it would seem. In brief, M. Rostand’s literary fortunes have been most happy. If he did not achieve fame at as early an age as Byron or Kipling, he has at least escaped the fate of dreary waiting that overtook even a Browning, and he has reaped his honors and emoluments soon enough to enjoy them. His picture presents him to us as a refined man who will make good use of them, and we may surely all hope that he is but at the beginning of a great and worthy career.
But it is not M. Rostand alone that has suddenly become a celebrity; everyone in Europe and America is also talking about a certain Cyrano de Bergerac. M. Rostand has therefore performed the almost unheard-of feat of making two literary reputations. Not that the now famous French duellist, wit, and semisceptic of the seventeenth century was entirely unknown before he was impersonated by M. Coquelin, but that he was known only to scholars and wide readers. English and American students of Swift and Poe had had to mention Cyrano and his Histoire Comique ou Voyage dans la Lune
in connection with Gulliver’s Travels
and the Unparalleled Adventure of One Hans Pfaall,
while French critics and bibliophiles like Nodier and Lacroix had succeeded in securing a partial currency for his name. In thoroughgoing Germany Professor Heinrich Koerting had actually devoted an important chapter to him in his History of the French Novel in the Seventeenth Century
—a chapter which the inquisitive reader will do well to consult. But the labors of bibliophiles and German professors sufficed only to keep poor Cyrano flying like a bat through a literary twilight; the effective talent or genius of a dramatic artist was needed to make him once more walk the earth like the high-minded, full-hearted man he was two hundred and fifty years ago.
That he was such a man and that M. Rostand was justified in taking him for a hero is quite apparent. He seems to have been born in Paris early in March, 1619, and to have borne the name of Savinien Cyrano. He came of a good old family, his grandfather Savinien having been Seignieur de Cyrano Mauvières and subsequently de Bergerac.
He got little systematic education and satirized his chief teacher in his comedy Le Pédant joué,
from which Molière afterward deigned to borrow a scene or two. Influenced by his friend Le Bret he joined the volunteer Guards of Carbon de Castel-Jaloux and soon won a reputation as a duellist, although it was his habit to fight as second rather than as principal.
Thus far, we at once perceive, M. Rostand has been true to history. Indeed, it may as well be admitted that he has made careful use of Cyrano’s own writings and of the accessible biographical details. The Le Bret of the play was Cyrano’s bosom friend and wrote an account of his life. Magdeleine Robineau, widow of the Baron de Neuvillette (actually killed at the siege of Arras), and Mère Marguerite de Jésus were also his friends in life, just as they are in the play. Moreover, Cyrano did drive the actor Montfleury off the stage, and did defend the poet Lignière, against a hundred men, at the Porte de Nesle. We know, furthermore, that he took pleasure in combining poetry and fighting, that he wrote high-flown epistles in the Marinistic style of the times, and that, for the greater part of his life, he was too independent to have a patron. Finally, the use to which M. Rostand has put Cyrano’s writings is exemplified by the fact that the amusingly ingenious methods of reaching the moon, given in the third act of the comedy, are derived from Cyrano’s most famous work, the Voyage dans la Lune.
The most serious and important side of Cyrano’s character is not, however, sufficiently brought out in the play. The siege of Arras, in which he was wounded, took place when he was twenty-one, and weaned him from the profession of arms. He became a student of philosophy under Gassendi, and the acquaintance, perhaps the friend, of the noble Italian philosopher, Campanella. There seems to be evidence that he travelled in England and Italy, perhaps in Poland, too; it is quite clear that he devoted himself seriously to the profession of letters, and that he rendered himself an object of suspicion to the orthodox, by his liberal opinions on religious matters. He died, finally, in September, 1655, under distressing circumstances, having been wounded by the fall of a log of wood, about fourteen months before. Le Bret and other friends stood by him after his death, just as they had done throughout his life, and endeavored to preserve the literary reputation that had been so dear to him. Their success was small, however, for the taste for Marinism had passed away, and, with improved standards, the poems and the once-admired letters could naturally find few readers. His comic books on the states and empires in the Moon and the Sun deserved a better fate, perhaps, but greater writers than Cyrano have suffered an equal eclipse ere now.
Yet, it is quite obvious, when all is said, that if this old worthy could return to earth and see himself upon the stage, he might order even M. Coquelin off, just as he did Montfleury. M. Rostand has given him an admirable historical setting, has treated him with the utmost sympathy, and has endowed him with a wealth of sentiment to which he was in part, at least, in all probability, a stranger. But he has stressed sentiment, whereas .Cyrano stood, in reality, for keen, realistic intelligence; thus, it is fair to say that the drama does not give us the real man, although from the point of view of art, there is no reason why it should have done so. The historic Cyrano, however, was seemingly little susceptible to feminine influences for temperamental reasons, not entirely connected with his ungainly nose. This member, of which M. Rostand has made so much, was indeed large, and had been greatly disfigured by scars received in duels; it was also a subject of much concern to its owner. But neither history nor art seems quite to warrant the part assigned to what is, for the moment, the most famous of all nasal protuberances.
Yet, the important question is—not whether Cyrano de Bergerac would enjoy M. Rostand’s delineation of his character or whether that delineation is entirely true to the facts that have come down to us—but whether M. Rostand has succeeded in writing a