2009 Economic Freedom Index Overview
2009 Economic Freedom Index Overview
I
n a period of slowing economic growth in • Put the individual first and allow people
many parts of the world, popular pressure to decide for themselves what is best for their
for governments to act to fix the situation own well-being and that of their families;
can be enormous. In responding to such pres- • Recognize that the free market is the only
sure, it is vital that leaders understand the real reliable predictor of the real prices of goods,
causes of negative economic developments labor, and capital;
and undertake actions that will fix them rather • Use government to shape a fair and secure
than exacerbate them. If intrusive government environment, protect private property and the
regulation has contributed to an economic value of money, enforce contracts, and promote
problem, it is unlikely that still more govern- competition, but not to produce or sell goods
ment regulation will cure it. If excessive taxes and services; and
have stifled investment and entrepreneurship, • Emphasize openness to international
increasing tax rates is unlikely to spur econom- trade and investment as the surest paths to
ic growth. If the monetary supply has been too increased productivity and economic growth.
loose or credit too easily available, lowering A government that limits its involvement in
interest rates is unlikely to be the magic fix the economic activity consistent with these prin-
public demands. ciples maximizes opportunities for individu-
The Index of Economic Freedom offers a time- als to reach their full economic potential and
tested formula for sustained economic growth. promotes the greatest levels of prosperity and
Grounded in the classical liberal economic human well-being for society as a whole.
theories of Adam Smith and Friedrich Hayek, In 2009, the Index of Economic Freedom is cel-
the Index promotes economic policies that: ebrating its 15th anniversary. The idea of pro-
1
ducing a user-friendly “index market, fueled by the eco-
of economic freedom” was The 10 Components of nomic slowdown and the
first discussed at The Heritage Economic Freedom political temptation of quick
Foundation in the late 1980s. • Business Freedom interventionist remedies,
The goal was to develop a sys- • Trade Freedom have gained momentum.
tematic, objective, and empiri- • Fiscal Freedom Even so, however, for coun-
cal measurement of economic • Government Size tries included in last year’s
freedom in economies around • Monetary Freedom Index, economic freedom
the world. • Investment Freedom advanced, from an average
The methodology for mea- • Financial Freedom score of 60.2 to an average
suring economic freedom • Property Rights score of 60.3. The overall
has been gradually enhanced • Freedom from average score this year for all
as the availability of data Corruption ranked countries, including
has grown. The 2009 Index of • Labor Freedom the 21 appearing for the first
Economic Freedom covers 183 time in the Index, is 59.5.2
countries1 and measures 10 • Four Asia–Pacific econ-
separate components of economic freedom. omies lead the world in economic freedom.
(See text box, “The 10 Components of Economic Hong Kong maintains its status as the world’s
Freedom.”) Chapter 1 and the methodological freest economy, a position it has held for 15
appendix explain these components and how consecutive years. It was the only economy
to assess them in detail. to score at least 90 on the 100-point economic
Taken together, these 10 components of eco- freedom scale. Singapore remains close, ranked
nomic freedom provide a portrait of a country’s as the world’s second freest economy. Austra-
economic policies and establish benchmarks lia has climbed to third place in the 2009 Index,
by which to gauge strengths and weaknesses. with New Zealand only 0.4 point back in fifth
A systematic analysis of the 10 freedoms over place.
the 15-year history of the Index demonstrates • Every region continues to maintain
that economic freedom is the key to creating at least one of the top 20 freest economies.
an environment in which entrepreneurship Ten of the 20 freest economies are European,
and innovation flourish, with rapid economic led by Ireland, Denmark, Switzerland, and
growth and sustainable development as the the United Kingdom. Five are in the Asia–
happy results. Pacific region, and two (the United States and
Canada) are from North America. The other
Highlights from the 2009 Index regions are represented by one country each:
• Despite the progress made over the past Chile (South and Central America/Carib-
15 years, the struggle between the state and bean region); Mauritius (Sub-Saharan Africa
the free market continues. Many govern- region); and Bahrain (Middle East/North
ments are maintaining a strong commitment Africa region).
to economic freedom, but others are regress- • Economic freedom is strongly related
ing. Regrettably, populist attacks on the free to good economic performance. Per capita
1. The 2009 Index has expanded its coverage 2. For countries graded in both the 2008 and 2009
to include for the first time Afghanistan, Bhutan, editions of the Index of Economic Freedom, average
Comoros, Dominica, Eritrea, Kiribati, Liberia, scores increased from 60.2 to 60.3. However, the
Liechtenstein, Macau, Maldives, Micronesia, average economic freedom score for all countries
Papua New Guinea, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and in the 2009 Index is only 59.5 because of the
the Grenadines, Samoa, São Tomé and Príncipe, addition to the Index rankings of 21 previously
Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Timor-Leste, Tonga, unrated economies, most of which score below the
and Vanuatu. world average.
)0
)*
(,#,+(
.
+#*,0 *#0)-
=i\\ Dfjkcp Df[\iXk\cp Dfjkcp I\gi\jj\[
=i\\ Dfjkcp Df[\iXk\cp Dfjkcp I\gi\jj\[ =i\\ =i\\ Le]i\\
=i\\ =i\\ Le]i\\ '%%.>cYZmd[:Xdcdb^X;gZZYdbJZfi\
'%%.>cYZmd[:Xdcdb^X;gZZYdbJZfi\
JfliZ\1'%%.>cYZmd[:Xdcdb^X;gZZYdbLVh]^c\idc!
JfliZ\1'%%.>cYZmd[:Xdcdb^X;gZZYdbLVh]^c\idc! 9#8#/I]Z=Zg^iV\Z;djcYVi^dcVcY9dl?dcZh
9#8#/I]Z=Zg^iV\Z;djcYVi^dcVcY9dl?dcZh 8dbeVcn!>cX#!'%%.!Vi]iie/$$lll#]Zg^iV\Z#dg\$^cYZm#
8dbeVcn!>cX#!'%%.!Vi]iie/$$lll#]Zg^iV\Z#dg\$
^cYZm0>ciZgcVi^dcVaBdcZiVgn;jcY!LdgaY:Xdcdb^X :_Xik) _\i`kX^\%fi^
Djiadd`YViVWVhZ!6eg^a'%%,!Vi]iie/$$lll#^b[#dg\$
ZmiZgcVa$ejWh$[i$lZd$'%%-$%&$lZdYViV$^cYZm#Vhem#
:_Xik( _\i`kX^\%fi^
to policies that promote economic freedom
is critical to achieving development and last-
incomes are much higher in countries that are ing prosperity. Countries that are too quick
economically free. Economies rated “free” or to abandon their efforts at policy reform
“mostly free” in the 2009 Index enjoy incomes often find their economic freedom fading
that are more than double the average lev- away, along with their prosperity. We have
els in all other countries and more than eight seen ebbs and flows of economic freedom
times higher than the incomes of “repressed” in specific countries or regions. The erosion
economies. of economic freedom in South America, for
• Overall human development, political example, reflects reversals of free-market
openness, and environmental sustainability policies in some countries and a lack of per-
thrive in an environment that is economically severance in pursuing economic freedom in
free. Economic freedom is about more than a others. Venezuela, in particular, is tempting
business environment in which entrepreneur- long-run decline as President Hugo Chávez
ship and prosperity can flourish. With its far- takes the country further down an anti-dem-
reaching impacts on various aspects of human ocratic and anti–free market path.
development, economic freedom empowers As shown in Chart 2, of the 179 economies
people, unleashes powerful forces of choice and that are numerically graded in the 2009 Index,3
opportunity, gives nourishment to other liber- only seven have very high freedom scores of
ties, and improves the overall quality of life. 80 or more, putting them in the “free” category
(See below, “Economic Freedom Matters.”) (the highest). The next 23 countries have scores
• A sustained commitment to economic
freedom is critical to fostering economic
3. Numerical grading was not possible for
development and prosperity. The Index Afghanistan, Iraq, Liechtenstein, and Sudan due to
findings reveal that sustained commitment the limited availability of relevant data.
Executive Summary 3
between 70 and 80, placing them in the “mostly racy Index. 4 They are clearly interrelated
free” category. Thus, a total of only 30 coun- and together form a coherent philosophy of
tries, or about one-sixth of all countries graded, governance.
have economic systems in which individuals Higher economic freedom is also strongly
enjoy substantial levels of freedom. The larg- correlated with overall human development as
est portion of the countries graded—119 econ- measured by the United Nations Human Devel-
omies—have freedom scores between 50 and opment Index,5 which measures life expectancy,
70. Of those, 53 economies are “moderately literacy, education, and the standard of living in
free” (scores of 60–70), and 67 economies are countries worldwide. (See Chart 5.)
“mostly unfree” (scores of 50–60). This year, The prosperity that flows from economic
29 countries have “repressed economies” with freedom results in greater access to education,
scores below 50. reduced illiteracy, increased access to higher
quality health care and food supplies, and lon-
Economic Freedom matters ger life expectancy.
There are clear relationships between eco- In addition, economically free countries do
nomic freedom and numerous other posi- a better job of protecting the environment. In
tive economic and social indicators, the most January 2008, the World Economic Forum, the
prominent being the strong relationship Center for International Earth Science Informa-
between the level of economic freedom and tion Network (CIESIN), and the Yale Center for
the level of prosperity in a given country. (See Environmental Law and Policy published an
Chart 3.) Environmental Performance Index (EPI).6 The
Previous editions of the Index have con- EPI shows a country’s performance in coping
firmed the tangible benefits of living in freer with environmental challenges, providing “a
societies. Not only are higher levels of econom- composite index of current national environ-
ic freedom associated with higher per capita mental protection efforts.”7
incomes and higher GDP growth rates, but Chart 6 illustrates the relationship between
those higher growth rates seem to create a vir- economic freedom scores and the EPI. The chart
tuous cycle, triggering further improvements shows a strong relationship between economic
in economic freedom. freedom and environmental performance: The
Greater economic freedom can also provide freer the economy, the better the level of envi-
more fertile ground for effective and democrat- ronmental protection or sustainability.
ic governance. It empowers people to exercise The lesson is clear: Economic freedom is
greater control of their daily lives. By increas- good not only for growth and individual eco-
ing options, economic freedom ultimately nomic advancement, but also for the progres-
nurtures political reform as well. Economic
freedom makes it possible for individuals to
4. For more information on the EIU Democracy
gain the economic resources necessary to chal- Index, see Laza Kekic, “The Economist Intelligence
lenge entrenched interests or compete for polit- Unit’s Index of Democracy,” The World in 2007:
ical power, thereby encouraging the creation of Democracy Index, at [Link]
more pluralistic societies. pdf/Democracy_Index_2007_v3.pdf.
5. For more information on the United Nations
Debate has occasionally arisen over the
Human Development Index, see United Nations
direction of causality between economic free- Development Programme, Human Development
dom and democracy because of the complex Reports, at [Link]
interplay between them. However, the posi- 6. See Daniel C. Esty, M. A. Levy, C. H. Kim,
tive relationship is undeniable. Chart 4 shows A. de Sherbinin, T. Srebotnjak, and V. Mara, 2008
Environmental Performance Index (New Haven: Yale
the relationship between economic freedom
Center for Environmental Law and Policy, 2008), at
and democratic governance as measured by [Link]
the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democ- 7. Ibid.
% %
'% )% +% -% &%% '% )% +% -% &%%
'%%.>cYZmd[:Xdcdb^X;gZZYdbJZfi\ '%%.>cYZmd[:Xdcdb^X;gZZYdbJZfi\
JfliZ\1'%%.>cYZmd[:Xdcdb^X;gZZYdbLVh]^c\idc! JfliZ\1'%%.>cYZmd[:Xdcdb^X;gZZYdbLVh]^c\idc!
9#8#/I]Z=Zg^iV\Z;djcYVi^dcVcY9dl?dcZh 9#8#/I]Z=Zg^iV\Z;djcYVi^dcVcY9dl?dcZh
8dbeVcn!>cX#!'%%.!Vi]iie/$$lll#]Zg^iV\Z#dg\$ 8dbeVcn!>cX#!'%%.!Vi]iie/$$lll#]Zg^iV\Z#dg\$
^cYZm0>ciZgcVi^dcVaBdcZiVgn;jcY!LdgaY:Xdcdb^X ^cYZm0I]Z:Xdcdb^hi>ciZaa^\ZcXZJc^iÉh>cYZmd[
Djiadd`YViVWVhZ!6eg^a'%%,!Vi]iie/$$lll#^b[#dg\$ 9ZbdXgVXn!8djcign;dgZXVhi^c\HZgk^XZh!:Xdcdb^hi
ZmiZgcVa$ejWh$[i$lZd$'%%-$%&$lZdYViV$^cYZm#Vhem# >ciZaa^\ZcXZJc^i!Vi]iie/$$lll#ZXdcdb^hi#Xdb$
bZY^V$eY[$9ZbdXgVXnT>cYZmT'%%,Tk(#eY[#
:_Xik* _\i`kX^\%fi^
:_Xik+ _\i`kX^\%fi^
<Zfefd`Z=i\\[fdXe[ <Zfefd`Z=i\\[fd
?ldXe;\m\cfgd\ek Xe[k_\<em`ifed\ek
L%E%?ldXe;\m\cfgd\ek@e[\o <em`ifed\ekXcG\i]fidXeZ\@e[\o
'%0, 8dggZaVi^dc/%#+( /*%/ /,%-
'%0) 8dggZaVi^dc/%#**
.-%/
'%/'
--%*
-(%)
'%-) '%,0
Executive Summary 5
sive values and public goods that people seek It empowers the poor and builds the middle
for society as a whole. class. It is a philosophy that encourages entre-
In economically free societies, children go to preneurship and disperses economic power
school rather than to work, trees are valued for and decision-making throughout an economy.
their shade rather than as fuel, workers worry Governments that embrace the desires of their
about job safety rather than unemployment, citizens for growing and sustainable prosperity
and hospitals are places of hope rather than will find the surest path to be that which is also
despair. the widest and most open, offering each indi-
Economic freedom is the revolutionary eco- vidual the chance to walk freely in their own
nomic counterpart to democratic pluralism. way toward a better future.
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2008
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Government Size
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Trade Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Freedom from
Overall Score
World Rank
Corruption
Country
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2008
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Government Size
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Trade Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Freedom from
Overall Score
World Rank
Corruption
Country
Executive Summary 7
Index of Economic Freedom World Rankings
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2008
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Government Size
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Trade Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Freedom from
Overall Score
World Rank
Corruption
Country
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2008
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Government Size
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Trade Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Freedom from
Overall Score
World Rank
Corruption
Country
111 Sri Lanka 56.0 –2.4 73.7 71 73.2 80.5 59.4 20 40 40 32 70.8
112 The Gambia 55.8 –1.1 59.9 59.6 71.9 74.4 71.9 50 50 30 23 67.0
113 Mozambique 55.7 0.2 54.2 73.4 77.7 76.5 75.9 50 50 30 28 41.1
114 Mali 55.6 0.1 42.2 73 69.4 81.4 79.6 50 40 30 27 63.8
115 Benin 55.4 0.1 43.8 67.4 67.2 88.5 79.6 40 60 30 27 50.3
116 Croatia 55.1 1.0 59.9 87.6 68.7 31.7 79.0 50 60 30 41 43.4
117 Nigeria 55.1 0.0 55.1 61.8 84.4 64.3 77.9 30 40 30 22 85.8
118 Gabon 55.0 0.9 59.9 57 61.7 84.8 73.8 40 40 40 33 60.0
119 Côte d’Ivoire 55.0 1.0 45.8 70.4 58.1 87.6 79.1 40 60 30 21 57.8
120 Moldova 54.9 –3.0 70.1 81.6 85.3 51.3 67.6 30 50 40 28 45.1
121 Papua New Guinea 54.8 n/a 60.1 87.2 67.4 71.0 81.4 30 30 20 20 81.1
122 Tajikistan 54.6 0.2 45.1 82.6 89.3 85.9 63.2 30 40 30 21 58.7
123 India 54.4 0.3 54.4 51 73.8 77.8 69.3 30 40 50 35 62.3
124 Rwanda 54.2 0.0 58.9 61.2 76.8 76.8 70.8 40 40 30 28 59.5
125 Suriname 54.1 –0.2 41.5 64.2 67.7 75.5 72.2 30 30 40 35 84.8
126 Tonga 54.1 n/a 79.0 56 82.5 58.0 68.9 40 20 20 17 99.4
127 Mauritania 53.9 –1.2 53.6 75.6 75.4 65.9 77.7 50 40 25 26 50.2
128 Niger 53.8 1.0 36.9 70.4 66.3 88.8 89.5 50 40 30 26 40.6
129 Malawi 53.7 1.1 45.2 68.8 70.7 48.6 69.8 50 50 50 27 57.2
130 Bolivia 53.6 0.5 58.5 81.8 84.8 71.9 67.9 20 60 20 29 41.9
131 Indonesia 53.4 0.2 46.7 76.4 77.5 88.0 71.6 30 40 30 23 50.9
132 China 53.2 0.1 51.6 71.4 70.6 88.9 72.9 30 30 20 35 61.8
133 Nepal 53.2 –0.9 60.5 63.2 86.3 91.0 78.7 20 30 30 25 46.9
Bosnia and
134 53.1 –0.8 59.9 77.2 71.8 37.6 79.0 50 60 10 33 52.1
Herzegovina
135 Ethiopia 53.0 0.5 62.6 68.6 77.4 82.7 65.5 40 20 30 24 59.4
136 Cameroon 53.0 –1.3 39.3 56 69.6 93.6 76.0 40 50 30 24 51.5
137 Ecuador 52.5 –2.8 54.0 72.6 85.8 83.1 75.0 30 40 25 21 38.3
138 Argentina 52.3 –1.8 62.1 70 70.3 75.6 60.6 50 40 20 29 45.6
139 Micronesia 51.7 n/a 59.8 81 97.4 0.0 76.7 30 30 30 30 82.3
140 Djibouti 51.3 0.1 38.1 31.8 80.8 59.4 76.6 50 60 30 29 57.9
141 Syria 51.3 4.2 61.4 54 87.0 74.9 67.2 40 20 30 24 54.9
142 Equatorial Guinea 51.3 –0.3 45.7 59.4 75.5 86.3 81.4 30 40 30 19 46.1
143 Maldives 51.3 n/a 83.2 44 95.8 0.0 76.5 30 30 30 33 90.1
144 Guinea 51.0 –1.8 45.2 59.6 71.1 91.9 57.4 40 40 20 19 66.3
145 Vietnam 51.0 0.6 61.7 63.4 74.3 77.3 67 30 30 10 26 70.0
146 Russia 50.8 1.0 54.0 60.8 78.9 70.6 65.5 30 40 25 23 60.0
147 Haiti 50.5 1.5 37.7 79.4 77.9 93.8 69.0 30 30 10 16 61.2
148 Uzbekistan 50.5 –1.4 68.4 65.4 88.3 68.1 62.6 30 20 20 17 64.9
149 Timor-Leste 50.5 n/a 47.0 73 64.7 84.0 74.1 30 20 20 26 66.0
150 Laos 50.4 0.1 59.5 66.4 70.6 89.7 75.4 30 20 10 19 63.5
Executive Summary 9
Index of Economic Freedom World Rankings
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2008
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Government Size
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Trade Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Freedom from
Overall Score
World Rank
Corruption
Country