0% found this document useful (0 votes)
87 views1 page

Military Justice Administration Changes

Gen. Crowder issued a memorandum in January 1919 that changed the routing of certain papers and duties in the Judge Advocate General's office. This impacted Gen. Ansell's duties with respect to the administration of military justice, though the specific changes are not described. The controversy over military justice administration does not seem to have affected staff morale. Gen. Ansell's report on his European trip was given as lectures to staff but was never officially forwarded to the War Department and its recommendations did not appear to be acted upon.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
87 views1 page

Military Justice Administration Changes

Gen. Crowder issued a memorandum in January 1919 that changed the routing of certain papers and duties in the Judge Advocate General's office. This impacted Gen. Ansell's duties with respect to the administration of military justice, though the specific changes are not described. The controversy over military justice administration does not seem to have affected staff morale. Gen. Ansell's report on his European trip was given as lectures to staff but was never officially forwarded to the War Department and its recommendations did not appear to be acted upon.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

832 ESTABLISHMENT OF MILITARY JUSTICE .

, Q. Upon the return of Gen . Crowder to the office what changes were made a s
to the duties of Gen . Ansell with respect to the administration of militar y
justice?A. Shortly after his return to the office Gen . Crofter issued a memo-
randum changing the routing of certain classes of papers, as I remember .
(Memorandum herewith. )
Q . To what extent have you been associated with the Division of Militar y
Justice in the Judge Advocate General's Office?A . When I was first ordere d
to duty in the Judge Advocate General's Department I was assigned to th e
Division of Military Justice, under Col . Read. I remained on that duty fo r
about three weeks . During that time I reviewed some records, but my prin-
cipal duty was preparing indorsements to letters pertaining to military justic e
and acting as a sort of executive officer to that divisionassigning rooms,
desks, checking up the record room, etc .
Q. So far as you have observed in your capacity as executive officer, wha t
has been the effect, if any, upon the morale and efficiency of the office of thi s
controversy which is going on, with respect to the administration of militar y
justice?A . So far as affecting the morale of the office I noticed no particula r
change . There have been several officers from the office and some officers
assigned from the Provost Marshal General's Office on some special duty ,
whose functions I know nothing about . . Prior to the time that this discussio n
arose I gained the impression from talking to officers from civil life on dut y
in the department that they believed that changes in the court-martial manual
and in the Articles of War, should be made . Since this controversy arose I
have not taken occasion to express any views, nor to receive any .
Q . Explain fully what disposition was made of Gen . Ansell's report of his
European trip?A . Along about the last of August, I can't be sure of these
dates, but I know it occurred before we moved into this building, Gen . Ansel l
gave a lecture to all of the officers of the department on his trip abroad ;
this was shortly after his return . As I remember the circumstances he went
through the executive office into Gen . Crowder's office and got that report from
Gen . Crowder's desk, and then went on through into the library, where th e
lecture was given .
Q. Was that the original or a copy of the report?A . That was the original .
After we moved into the office over here he gave another lecture on tha t
report to the officers who had come in since that time . When Col . Morrow
and Col. Power went abroad they asked me to get that report and have copie s
made . I had those copies made one Sunday morning, and as I remember I
had four of them made by Mr . O'Neil, a stenographer in the office, who cam e
to work Saturday night and Sunday morning as they were leaving on Sunda y
afternoon : I furnished each with a copy and I kept two copies, one for mysel f
and one I attached to the original. I found that that report had never bee n
put on file, and later on, some one else who was going abroad (I think it wa s
Col . Goff), asked for a copy . In the meantime I thought that Gen . Ansell ha d
the report in his file, and I suggested that he had better put it in the files o f
the officeand that was done. I furnished Col . Goff a copy, I think I gave
him my copy .
Q. You don't know when this report came into the hands of Gen . Crowder?
A. No, sir ; I do not .
Q. When was the report, if at all, forwarded to the War Department?A .
It never was forwarded so far as I know . The last I saw of it was in th e
files of the office.
Q . In that report Gen . Ansell calls attention to the liabilities which ar e
liable to grow out of the presence of our Army in France, and urged steps b e
taken to gather and record facts with a view to forehanded preparation agains t
unjust claims and excessive damages for the just ones . Do you know whethe r
any action was ever taken along those lines?A. None so far as I know .
Q . You don't know what is being done along those lines in France?A . I
don't know, sir .
Q. Have any steps been taken by the office of the Judge Advocate General
in Washington to bring about any such action?A . None ; so far as I know . I t
may have been taken and gone out direct from the Judge Advocate General ' s
office without my knowing it . '
Q . Is it probable that in matters of that kind that correspondence would go
out without passing over your desk?A . It could go out without passing ove r
my desk . Does not necessarily pass through me . Ordinarily I would hea r
something about it, but it is not necessary .
Q . Going back to the memorandum of January, 1919, changing the routing o f
work in the office, do you recall what effect that had upon Gen . Ansell's duties,

You might also like