0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views9 pages

Hemodialysis Frequency Analysis Report

1) The document analyzes data from 45 hemodialysis patients regarding their hemodialysis frequency, anxiety levels, and condition. 2) It finds that most patients (66.7%) undergo hemodialysis frequently, over half (55.6%) have high anxiety, and most (64.4%) have been undergoing hemodialysis for a long time. 3) There are strong associations between more frequent hemodialysis and higher anxiety, as well as longer treatment duration and higher anxiety. Patients undergoing frequent hemodialysis or for a long time are much more likely to have high anxiety.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views9 pages

Hemodialysis Frequency Analysis Report

1) The document analyzes data from 45 hemodialysis patients regarding their hemodialysis frequency, anxiety levels, and condition. 2) It finds that most patients (66.7%) undergo hemodialysis frequently, over half (55.6%) have high anxiety, and most (64.4%) have been undergoing hemodialysis for a long time. 3) There are strong associations between more frequent hemodialysis and higher anxiety, as well as longer treatment duration and higher anxiety. Patients undergoing frequent hemodialysis or for a long time are much more likely to have high anxiety.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Nama : fernando

Lokal : b
Semester : VII

FREQUENCIES
VARIABLES=hemodialisa frekuensihemodialisa kat kecemasa
/STATISTICS=STDDEV MEAN MEDIAN MODE
/ORDER= ANALYSIS .

Statistics

frekuensihe
hemodialis a modialisa kat kecemasa
N Valid 45 45 45 45
Missing 0 0 0 0
Mean 1,36 1,67 1,49 1,56
Median 1,00 2,00 1,00 2,00
Mode 1 2 1 2
Std. Deviation ,484 ,477 ,506 ,503
Dariuji statistikdidapatkanbahwa

Frequency Table

hemodialisa

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid lama 29 64,4 64,4 64,4
baru 16 35,6 35,6 100,0
Total 45 100,0 100,0

Jadi dari tabel dapat disimpulkan dari 45 koresponden yang melakukan hemodialiasa ,
didapatkan 64,4%(29) adalah kategori pasien baru.
frekuensihemodialisa

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid jarang 15 33,3 33,3 33,3
sering 30 66,7 66,7 100,0
Total 45 100,0 100,0

Jadi dari tabel dapat disimpulkan, dari 45 koresponden yang melakukan hemodialisa,
didapatkan 66,7%(30) adalah kategori sering melakukan hemodialisa.
kat

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid baik 23 51,1 51,1 51,1
kurang baik 22 48,9 48,9 100,0
Total 45 100,0 100,0
Dari tabel dapat disimpulkan, dari 45
kecemasa

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid sedang 20 44,4 44,4 44,4
berat 25 55,6 55,6 100,0
Total 45 100,0 100,0

Crosstabs
[DataSet0]

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
hemodialis a * kecemas a 45 100,0% 0 ,0% 45 100,0%
frekuensihemodialisa *
45 100,0% 0 ,0% 45 100,0%
kecemasa
kat * kecemasa 45 100,0% 0 ,0% 45 100,0%

hemodialisa * kecemasa

Crosstab

Count
kecemasa
sedang berat Total
hemodialis a lama 17 12 29
baru 3 13 16
Total 20 25 45
Chi-Square Tests

As ymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6,638b 1 ,010
Continuity Correctiona 5,122 1 ,024
Likelihood Ratio 7,048 1 ,008
Fis her's Exact Test ,013 ,011
Linear-by-Linear
6,491 1 ,011
As sociation
N of Valid Cases 45
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count les s than 5. The minimum expected count is
7,11.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for
6,139 1,430 26,348
hemodialisa (lama / baru)
For cohort kecemasa =
3,126 1,078 9,068
sedang
For cohort kecemasa =
,509 ,311 ,834
berat
N of Valid Cas es 45

frekuensihemodialisa * kecemasa

Crosstab

Count
kecemasa
sedang berat Total
frekuensihemodialisa jarang 13 2 15
sering 7 23 30
Total 20 25 45
Chi-Square Tests

As ymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 16,245 b 1 ,000
Continuity Correctiona 13,781 1 ,000
Likelihood Ratio 17,450 1 ,000
Fis her's Exact Test ,000 ,000
Linear-by-Linear
15,884 1 ,000
As sociation
N of Valid Cases 45
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count les s than 5. The minimum expected count is
6,67.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for
frekuensihemodialis a 21,357 3,854 118,357
(jarang / sering)
For cohort kecemas a =
3,714 1,885 7,319
sedang
For cohort kecemas a =
,174 ,047 ,641
berat
N of Valid Cases 45

kat * kecemasa

Crosstab

Count
kecemasa
sedang berat Total
kat baik 19 4 23
kurang baik 1 21 22
Total 20 25 45
Chi-Square Tests

As ymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 27,751 b 1 ,000
Continuity Correctiona 24,680 1 ,000
Likelihood Ratio 32,437 1 ,000
Fis her's Exact Test ,000 ,000
Linear-by-Linear
27,135 1 ,000
As sociation
N of Valid Cases 45
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count les s than 5. The minimum expected count is
9,78.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for kat
99,750 10,229 972,773
(baik / kurang baik)
For cohort kecemasa
18,174 2,654 124,468
= s edang
For cohort kecemasa
,182 ,074 ,446
= berat
N of Valid Cases 45
Logistic Regression
[DataSet0]

Case Processing Summary


a
Unweighted Cases N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 45 100,0
Missing Cases 0 ,0
Total 45 100,0
Unselected Cases 0 ,0
Total 45 100,0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total
number of cases.

De pendent Varia ble Encoding

Original Value Int ernal Value


sedang 0
berat 1

Block 0: Beginning Block


Classification Tablea,b

Predicted

kecemasa Percentage
Observed sedang berat Correct
Step 0 kecemasa sedang 0 20 ,0
berat 0 25 100,0
Overall Percentage 55,6
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500

Va riables in the Equation

B S. E. W ald df Sig. Ex p(B)


St ep 0 Constant ,223 ,300 ,553 1 ,457 1,250

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step Variables hemodialis a 6,638 1 ,010
0 frekuensihemodialisa 16,245 1 ,000
kat 27,751 1 ,000
Overall Statistics 30,563 3 ,000

Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)

Om nibus Tests of Model Coe fficients

Chi-square df Sig.
St ep 1 St ep 38,312 3 ,000
Block 38,312 3 ,000
Model 38,312 3 ,000
St ep 2a St ep -,599 1 ,439
Block 37,713 2 ,000
Model 37,713 2 ,000
a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the
Chi-squares value has dec reas ed from the
previous st ep.
Mode l Summ ary

-2 Log Cox & Snell Nagelk erke


St ep lik elihood R Square R Square
1 23,515 a ,573 ,767
2 24,113 a ,567 ,760
a. Es timation terminated at it erat ion number 6 bec aus e
parameter estimat es c hanged by less than ,001.

Cl assi fica tion Ta blea

Predic ted

kecemasa Percentage
Observed sedang berat Correc t
St ep 1 kecemasa sedang 18 2 90,0
berat 2 23 92,0
Overall Percentage 91,1
St ep 2 kecemasa sedang 19 1 95,0
berat 4 21 84,0
Overall Percentage 88,9
a. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

95,0% C.I.for EXP(B)


B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
Step
a hemodialis a ,888 1,142 ,605 1 ,437 2,430 ,259 22,777
1 frekuensihemodialisa 2,665 1,370 3,782 1 ,052 14,361 ,979 210,611
kat 4,002 1,281 9,765 1 ,002 54,693 4,445 672,971
Constant -11,084 3,605 9,454 1 ,002 ,000
Step
a frekuensihemodialisa 2,588 1,279 4,096 1 ,043 13,299 1,085 162,986
2 kat 4,295 1,280 11,262 1 ,001 73,308 5,968 900,470
Constant -10,091 3,120 10,464 1 ,001 ,000
a. Variable(s) entered on s tep 1: hemodialisa, frekuens ihemodialisa, kat.

Model if Term Removed

Change in
Model Log -2 Log Sig. of the
Variable Likelihood Likelihood df Change
Step hemodialis a -12,057 ,599 1 ,439
1 frekuensihemodialisa -14,228 4,942 1 ,026
kat -19,918 16,322 1 ,000
Step frekuensihemodialisa -14,695 5,276 1 ,022
2 kat -22,188 20,263 1 ,000
Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 2a Variables hemodialis a ,627 1 ,428
Overall Statistics ,627 1 ,428
a. Variable(s) removed on step 2: hemodialisa.

You might also like