Modified date: 23/10/2019
Document name:
Status: Draft
DocId
Info type: TPS
Program/Machine type: Project/Group:
Title:
SW Test Approach
Summary: Company Secret
AIR/PBS:
Release:
Content summary:
Remaining risk:
Risk ID Short Description
For change control Reviewers For info
Maintainer : <Maintainer>
Doc ID / Version : DocId
SW Test Approach
Last update : 2019-06-24
Status : Draft
<Name> <GL> <Name> < FCT> <Name> <PL>
<Name> <FCA>
<Name> <TL>
<Name> <EE>
<Name> <PE>
<Name> <Dev>
Maintainer : <Maintainer> Template information:
Pages incl. cover : Version: 1
Word processor : MS Word 2016 Owner: Johan van den Berg - JBHJ
Name: SW Test [Link]
© ASML 2018. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without the prior written consent of ASML.
© ASML 2019 Company Secret Page 2 of 13
Maintainer : <Maintainer>
Doc ID / Version : DocId
SW Test Approach
Last update : 2019-06-24
Status : Draft
3 CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS
Name author Part(s) of this document
5 OPEN ISSUES
ID Description AIR, IP/ECR Action holder
9 DOCUMENT CHANGE & HISTORY RECORD
Maintainer Last update Status Version AIR, IP/ECR Comment
© ASML 2019 Company Secret Page 3 of 13
Maintainer : <Maintainer>
Doc ID / Version : DocId
SW Test Approach
Last update : 2019-06-24
Status : Draft
1 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
2
3TCE Controlling documents (auto generated, do not change)
Ref. Title Author Modified date
<Test Strategy>
4TCE Reference documents (auto generated, do not change)
Ref. Title Author Modified date
6 USEFUL LINKS
Link Description
ASML coding standards The ASML coding standards
ASML Dictionary Software Architecture User Manual
Black Book of testing Software Test Architecture User Manual
Component List Overview of the Twinscan components
FC Test Strategy guideline Guideline on how to use this template for FC Test Level test strategy
FCT Overview of all FCT’s
Interface viewer Overview of the required and provided interfaces per component and interface details
SW Product Architects Overview of all SW Product Architects
System Test Strategy guideline Guideline on how to use this template for System Interface Level test strategy
Twinscan Layer Diagrams Twinscan layer diagrams,
Unit Test Strategy guideline Guideline on how to use this template for Unit Test Level test strategy
Yellow Book Software Architecture User Manual
7
© ASML 2019 Company Secret Page 4 of 13
Maintainer : <Maintainer>
Doc ID / Version : DocId
SW Test Approach
Last update : 2019-06-24
Status : Draft
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
21 TEST SCOPE...................................................................................................................................................... 5
32 TEST ITEMS....................................................................................................................................................... 6
4 2.1 REQUIREMENTS............................................................................................................................................................ 6
53 TEST CONDITIONS............................................................................................................................................ 7
6 3.1 RISK ANALYSIS.............................................................................................................................................................. 7
7 3.2 RISK DETAILS................................................................................................................................................................. 7
8 3.2.1 RISK1......................................................................................................................................................................... 7
9 3.2.2 RISK2......................................................................................................................................................................... 7
10 3.3 RISK AFTER MITIGATION.............................................................................................................................................. 7
11 3.3.1 RISKAM1.................................................................................................................................................................... 8
12 3.3.2 RISKAM2.................................................................................................................................................................... 8
134 TEST DESIGN..................................................................................................................................................... 9
14 4.1 RISK MITIGATIONS......................................................................................................................................................... 9
15 4.1.1 MITIGATION RISK1................................................................................................................................................... 9
16 4.1.2 MITIGATION RISK2................................................................................................................................................... 9
175 TEST ENVIRONMENTS.................................................................................................................................... 10
186 ENTRY / EXIT CRITERIA.................................................................................................................................. 11
19 6.1 ENTRY CRITERIA......................................................................................................................................................... 11
20 6.2 EXIT CRITERIA.............................................................................................................................................................. 11
217 TEST SPECIFICATION..................................................................................................................................... 12
22 7.1 FFM/PROTO TEST CASES........................................................................................................................................... 12
23 7.2 PROGRESSION TEST CASES..................................................................................................................................... 12
24 7.3 REGRESSION TEST CASES........................................................................................................................................ 12
25
26 LIST OF TABLES
27Table 1 Affected components..................................................................................................................................... 5
28Table 2: Risk items..................................................................................................................................................... 7
29Table 3 Risk items after mitigation.............................................................................................................................. 8
30Table 4 Mitigations...................................................................................................................................................... 9
31
32 FIGURES
33Figure 1 Risk Assessment Matrix overview................................................................................................................ 7
34
© ASML 2019 Company Secret Page 5 of 13
Maintainer : <Maintainer>
Doc ID / Version : DocId
SW Test Approach
Last update : 2019-06-24
Status : Draft
11 TEST SCOPE
14The test scope describes what is in scope for the current document.
15 Platform: EUV (and for common components also DUV)
16 NXE:3400
17 QBL release
18
19Table 1 Affected components
Building Block Component CC Owner
BB-040-0011A CMEM
BB-006-0022C DIADEU
BB-006-0011A GNID
BB-006-0002B IDEU
BB-006-0002B IFEU
20
© ASML 2019 Company Secret Page 6 of 13
Maintainer : <Maintainer>
Doc ID / Version : DocId
SW Test Approach
Last update : 2019-06-24
Status : Draft
12 TEST ITEMS
82.1 REQUIREMENTS
9
ID Requirement Ref. Impacted Components Risk
introduced
10
11
12
© ASML 2019 Company Secret Page 7 of 13
Maintainer : <Maintainer>
Doc ID / Version : DocId
SW Test Approach
Last update : 2019-06-24
Status : Draft
13 TEST CONDITIONS
123.1 RISK ANALYSIS
13Find the Image Sensing’s strategy for Risk analysis in the following link:
14[Link]
15
16Table 2: Risk items
Risk ID Short Description Severity Likelihood Zone
RISK1
RISK2
17The mitigations are according to the risk matrix zone’s in Figure 1 Risk Assessment Matrix overview.
18
19Figure 1 Risk Assessment Matrix overview
203.2 RISK DETAILS
21The risk details include some additional information about the root cause of the risk.
223.2.1 RISK1
23[Description]
243.2.2 RISK2
25[Description]
263.3 RISK AFTER MITIGATION
27After the mitigations mentioned in Table 4 Mitigations have been executed, the following risks remain:
© ASML 2019 Company Secret Page 8 of 13
Maintainer : <Maintainer>
Doc ID / Version : DocId
SW Test Approach
Last update : 2019-06-24
Status : Draft
1Table 3 Risk items after mitigation
Risk ID Short Description Severity Likelihood Zone
RISKAM1
RISKAM2
23.3.1 RISKAM1
3[Description]
43.3.2 RISKAM2
5[Description]
© ASML 2019 Company Secret Page 9 of 13
Maintainer : <Maintainer>
Doc ID / Version : DocId
SW Test Approach
Last update : 2019-06-24
Status : Draft
14 TEST DESIGN
64.1 RISK MITIGATIONS
7
8Table 4 Mitigations
Risk ID Short Description Test case
RISK1
RISK2
9
104.1.1 MITIGATION RISK1
11[Description]
124.1.2 MITIGATION RISK2
13[Description]
14
© ASML 2019 Company Secret Page 10 of 13
Maintainer : <Maintainer>
Doc ID / Version : DocId
SW Test Approach
Last update : 2019-06-24
Status : Draft
15 TEST ENVIRONMENTS
4<Start your test environment description here>
© ASML 2019 Company Secret Page 11 of 13
Maintainer : <Maintainer>
Doc ID / Version : DocId
SW Test Approach
Last update : 2019-06-24
Status : Draft
16 ENTRY / EXIT CRITERIA
36.1 ENTRY CRITERIA
7<Start your entry criteria description here>
86.2 EXIT CRITERIA
12<Start your exit criteria description here>
13
© ASML 2019 Company Secret Page 12 of 13
Maintainer : <Maintainer>
Doc ID / Version : DocId
SW Test Approach
Last update : 2019-06-24
Status : Draft
17 TEST SPECIFICATION
2Note: This section is to be replaced by a test database in order to avoid repetition of testcases in every
3Test Approach.
47.1 FFM/PROTO TEST CASES
5Often written down in an EP (Execution Plan) template.
67.2 PROGRESSION TEST CASES
<Test-case ID> <Title>
Objective
Pre-conditions /
Set up
Configuration
Duration
Step Execute Expected result
ID
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Wrap up / Post-conditions
7
87.3 REGRESSION TEST CASES
<Test-case ID> <Title>
Objective
Pre-conditions /
Set up
Configuration
Duration
Step Execute Expected result
ID
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Wrap up / Post-conditions
9
© ASML 2019 Company Secret Page 13 of 13
