A blinded, randomized, controlled trial assessing conservative
management strategies for frozen shoulder
Sarah Russell, MSc, MCSPa , Arpit Jariwala, MChOrth, FRCS(Tr&Orth)b , Robert Conlon, BSc, MCSPa ,
James Selfe, PhDc , Jim Richards, PhDc , Michael Walton, MSc, FRCS(Tr&Orth)a,
Population:
Patients with primary frozen shoulder will be identified through clinical examination and plain
radiograph.
There is evidence of good inter-rater agreement on whether restriction is present and a high
threshold (50% restriction) for inclusion should sufficiently minimise diagnostic uncertainty.
Patients reported local shoulder pain, frequently present either over the anteromedial aspect of
the shoulder extending distally into the biceps region or over the lateral aspect of the shoulder
extending into the lateral deltoid region. Symptoms were present for at least 3 months.
Present with a clinical diagnosis of frozen shoulder characterised by restriction of passive
external rotation in the affected shoulder to less than 50% of the contralateral shoulder
Have radiographs that exclude glenohumeral arthritis and other pathology.
Age 40 to 70 years
Intervention
The exercise class group (group 1 &3 )treatment consisted of group therapy scheduled twice
per week for the 6-week intervention period.
All patients were given careful instruction and demonstration of each exercise by a supervising
physiotherapist. Patients performed a 50- minute exercise circuit composed of 12 stations.
Each 4-minute station was designed to facilitate range of motion exercises at the shoulder and
thoracic spine. Stick, pulley, and ball techniques were used to address forward elevation,
abduction, extension, and internal and external rotation.
additional station for scapula setting exercises and 2 stations addressing trunk rotation and side
flexion.
Exercise sheets were given to ensure compliance and to aid in understanding of the circuit. The
patients were also instructed on the specific shoulder exercises in the home exercise program
and given the information booklet.
The individual multimodal physiotherapy group received 2 sessions of individual physiotherapy
treatment per week for the 6- week intervention period.
The home exercise group received instruction on the specific shoulder exercises in the
information booklet. The information booklet included the home exercises; a description of
frozen shoulder; and advice on sleep, posture, and pain relief.
Comparison
Experimental Group
Group 1
Was given a 50- minute exercise circuit composed of 12 station.
Each 4-minute station was designed to facilitate range of motion exercises at the shoulder and
thoracic spine
Stick, pulley, and ball techniques were used to address forward elevation, abduction, extension,
and internal and external rotation
additional station for scapula setting exercises and 2 stations addressing trunk rotation and side
flexion.
Exercise sheets were given to ensure compliance and to aid in understanding of the circuit
Home exercise program.
Group 2
multimodal physiotherapy group received 2 sessions of individual physiotherapy treatment per
week for the 6- week intervention period
Maitland mobilizations
soft tissue massage
myofascial trigger point release, heat, and stretches
Home exercise program.
Control Group
Undergone home exercise program & advices regarding sleep, posture & pain relief.
Outcome
A group exercise class provides superior outcomes in relieving the signs and symptoms of frozen
shoulder. However, standard multimodal physiotherapy remains a good alternative and has
been demonstrated to be significantly better than unsupervised exercise at home. We would
recommend a trial of physiotherapy for stiffness- predominant frozen shoulders before more
invasive measures are considered.
There was a significant improvement from baseline in forward elevation and external rotation in
all 3 groups. The improvement was significantly greater in both of the physiotherapy
intervention over the home exercise group in focused & supplementary therapy at all time
points (P < .001). There were no significant differences between the exercise class and individual
physiotherapy groups in terms of range of motion at any stage
In Partial Fulfillment of Clinical Internship 1
Submitted to:
Ms. Lew Vykka Suico, PTRP
Clinical Instructor
Submitted by:
Rene Sandlee Orate