Remedial Law Mnemonics
Remedial Law Mnemonics
CIVIL PROCEDURE
M Memoranda
I Petition for certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition against any Interlocutory order issued by the
court
D Motion to Dismiss the complaint
T Third-party complaints
P Dilatory motions for Postponement
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES UNDER THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF SECTION 5(B) OF RULE 6 [PDEA – IF2RS2]
P Payment
D Discharge in bankruptcy
E Estoppel
A Any other matter by way of confession and avoidance
I Illegality
F2 Fraud
Former recovery
R Release
S2 Statute of limitations (Prescription)
Statute of frauds
TO WHOM SUMMONS ON DOMESTIC PRIVATE JURIDICAL ENTITIES MAY BE SERVED [PM - GCTI]
P President
M Managing partner
G General manager
C Corporate secretary
T Treasurer
I In-house counsel
NON-LITIGIOUS MOTIONS [W2P – SEA2]
S Motion for the issuance of an order directing the Sheriff to execute the final certificate of sale
E Motion for Extension to file answer
A2 Motion for the issuance of an Alias summons
Motion for the issuance of an Alias writ of execution
P Motion for Postponement intended for delay, save for certain exceptions
A Motion to hear Affirmative defenses
R Motion for Reconsideration of the court's action on the affirmative defenses
E Motion for Extension of time to file pleadings, affidavits or any other papers, except a motion
for extension to file an answer;
S Motion to Suspend proceedings without a temporary restraining order or injunction issued by
a higher court
DISMISSALS WITH PREJUDICE BY MOTION TO DISMISS OR AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES [SWAPPER] – Subject to the right of
appeal, an order granting a motion to dismiss or an affirmative defense based on the following shall bar the refiling of
the same action:
S The claim or demand of the plaintiff has been unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds
W The claim or demand of the plaintiff has been Waived
A The claim or demand of the plaintiff has been Abandoned
P Prescription
P The claim or demand of the plaintiff has been Paid
E The claim or demand of the plaintiff has been Extinguished
R Res judicata
OTHER DISMISSALS WITH PREJUDICE [MP – FAD3] - The following dismissal shall likewise bar the refiling of the same
action:
M Plaintiff’s Misrepresentation that he or she has served summons to the defendant, in cases
where plaintiff is authorized by the court to serve summons
P Failure of the party to file his or her Pre-trial brief (Sec. 5 and 6, Rule 18)
F Willful and deliberate Forum shopping by the party or his or her counsel (Sec. 5, Rule 7)
A Failure of the plaintiff or counsel to Appear, without valid cause, during the pre-trial,
courtannexed mediation, and judicial dispute resolution (Secs. 3 and 5, Rule 18)
D3 Dismissal by notice of the plaintiff where such notice provides that the dismissal is with
prejudice (Sec. 1, Rule 17)
Dismissal by notice of the plaintiff covered by the two-dismissal rule
Dismissal by motion of the plaintiff and the court orders that it is with prejudice. (Sec. 2, Rule
17)
M Material
I Immediate, not simply contingent or expectant
D Direct
A Actual
S Substantial
D Test of Definiteness – Whether the subpoena calls for the production of specific documents,
or rather for specific proof
R Test of Relevancy – Whether that proof is prima facie sufficiently relevant to justify enforcing
its production
S Any justice of the Supreme Court or of the Court of Appeals in any case or investigation
pending within the Philippines
O The Officer or body authorized by law to issue a subpoena in connection with investigations
conducted by said officer of body
D The court of the place where the Deposition is to be taken
A The court before whom the witness is required to Attend
QUASHING A SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM [POWiR] – The quashal must be based on the following grounds:
P The person in whose behalf the subpoena was issued failed to advance the reasonable cost of
the Production
O The subpoena is unreasonable and Oppressive
Wi The person in whose behalf the subpoena was issued failed to tender WItness fees and
kilometrage
R The Relevancy of the books, documents, or things sought to be produced does not appear
USE OF DEPOSITIONS [PADRE] - If the deponent is a witness, whether or not a party to the case, his/her deposition may
be used by any party for any purpose if the court finds that:
P The party offering the deposition has been unable to Procure the attendance of the witness
by subpoena
A The witness is unable to attend or testify because of Age, sickness, infirmity or imprisonment
D The witness is Dead
R The witness Resides at a distance more than one hundred (100) kilometers from the place of
trial or hearing, or is out of the Philippines (UNLESS it appears that his/her absence was
procured by the party offering the deposition)
E Upon application and notice, that such Exceptional circumstances exist as to make it
desirable, in the interest of justice to allow the deposition to be used
REQUISITES IN ORDER THAT A PARTY MAY COMPEL THE OTHER PARTY TO PRODUCE OR ALLOW THE INSPECTION OF
DOCUMENT OR THINGS [MoNDe - PEP]
Mo The party must file a Motion for the production or inspection of documents or things,
showing good cause therefor
N Notice of the motion must be served to all other parties of the case
De The motion must Designate the documents, papers, books, accounts, letters, photographs,
objects or tangible things which the party wishes to be produced and inspected
E When the trial of an issue of fact requires the Examination of a long account on either side, in
which case the commissioner may be directed to hear and report upon the whole issue or any
question involved
C When Carrying a judgment or order into effect
Q When a Question of fact, other than upon the pleadings, arises upon motion or otherwise, in
any stage of the case
T When the Taking of an account is necessary for the information of the court before judgment
WHEN JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS MADE [FO] – The court upon motion of the claimant on the ground that an
answer:
Ci Whenever Circumstances transpire after the finality of the decision rendering its execution
unjust and inequitable
Nu Nunc pro tunc entries which cause no prejudice to any party
Vo Void judgments
RES JUDICATA – BAR BY PRIOR JUDGMENT [F-JIM] – To be an absolute bar to the subsequent action, the following
requisites must concur:
J The court rendering it must have Jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties
I There must be between the two cases Identity of parties, subject matter and causes of action
M It must be a judgment or order on the Merits
EXCEPTIONS TO THE GENERAL RULE UNDER RULE 45 THAT ONLY QUESTIONS OF LAW MAY BE RAISED IN APPEALS
FROM RTC TO SC [C4 – GSMB – MF]
C4 When the factual findings of the Court of Appeals and the trial court are Contradictory
When the findings of fact are themselves Conflicting
When the findings of fact are Conclusions without citation of the specific evidence on which
they are based
When the findings of fact of the Court of Appeals are premised on the absence of evidence
but the evidence on record Contradicts such findings
RESIDUAL JURISDICTION OF THE COURT [WIPE App] – Prior to the transmittal of the original record or record on appeal,
the court which rendered judgement may:
DISMISSAL OF APPEAL [UP-PDP-SCAN] – Sec. 1, Rule 50 lists 9 grounds wherein the CA may, on its own motion or on
that of the appellee, dismiss an appeal. These are:
P Failure to file the notice of appeal or the record on appeal within the Period prescribed by
these Rules
D Failure of the appellant to pay the Docket and other lawful fees as provided in section 5, Rule
40 and section 4 of Rule 41
P Failure of the appellant to appear at the Preliminary conference under Rule 48 or to comply
with orders, circulars, or directives of the court without justifiable cause
S Failure of the appellant to Serve and file the required number of copies of his brief or
memorandum within the time provided by these Rules
C Failure of the appellant to take the necessary steps for the Correction or completion of the
record within the time limited by the court in its order
A Absence of specific assignment of errors in the appellant's brief, or of page references to the
record as required in section 13, paragraphs (a), (c), (d) and (f) of Rule 44
N The fact that the order or judgment appealed from is Not appealable
T Three (3) horses, cows, carabaos, or other beast of burden necessarily used in his/her
ordinary occupation
Ho Family Home, or homestead, land necessarily used in connection therewith
N Necessary clothing and articles for ordinary personal use, except jewelry
F2 Household Furniture and utensils necessary for housekeeping that has value not exceeding
P100K
One Fishing boat and accessories value of which does not exceed P100K used in livelihood
L2 Professional Libraries and equipment
Lettered gravestones
O Ordinary tools and implements used in trade, employment, or livelihood
P2 Provisions for individual or family use sufficient for 4 months
Monies, benefits, Privileges, or annuities accruing out of any life insurance
S2 Salaries, wages, or earnings as are necessary for support of family within 4 months preceding
levy
Properties Specially exempt from execution
RECOVERY OF PRICE IF SALE NOT EFFECTIVE; REVIVAL OF JUDGMENT [TIRE] - The purchaser may recover the purchase
price if the purchaser or his/her successor-in-interest is evicted therefrom:
C3 Over all violations of City or municipal ordinances committed within their respective territorial
jurisdictions
Over all offenses punishable with imprisonment of not more than 6 years irrespective of the
amount of fine (prision Correccional)
??? Over all offenses punishable with fine only amounting to not more than P4,000.00 without
the penalty of imprisonment
A When necessary for the orderly Administration of justice or to avoid oppression or multiplicity
of actions
I Where the prosecution is under an Invalid law, ordinance or regulation
D When Double jeopardy is clearly apparent
C When there is Clearly no prima facie case against the accused and the motion to quash on
that ground has been denied
A When the acts of the officer are without or in excess of Authority
M Where the charges are manifestly false and Motivated by the lust for vengeance
P Where it is a case of Persecution rather than prosecution
SUFFICIENCY OF COMPLAINT OR INFORMATION [PANDAN] – A complaint or information is sufficient if it states the:
WHEN BAIL SHOULD BE DENIED [PAFER] – If the penalty imposed by the trial court is imprisonment exceeding 6 years,
the accused shall be denied bail or his bail be cancelled upon a showing by the prosecution of the following:
P That he committed the offense while under Probation, parole or conditional pardon
A That there is undue risk that he may commit Another crime during the pendency of the
appeal
F That the circumstances of his case indicate the probability of Flight if released on bail
E That he has previously Escaped from legal confinement, evaded sentence or violated the
condition of his bail without valid justification
R Accused is a Recidivist, quasi-recidivist or habitual delinquent or has committed the crime
aggravated by the circumstance of reiteration
C Continuance
A Delay resulting from Absence or unavailability of an essential witness
M Mental incompetence or physical inability of the accused to stand trial
P Information dismissed upon motion of the Prosecutor
B Motion for Bill of particulars that does not conform to Sec. 9, Rule 116
I Motion for preliminary Investigation if filed beyond the five (5)-day reglementary period in
inquest proceedings
R Motion for Reinvestigation of the prosecutor when the motion is filed (1) without prior leave
of court; (2) when preliminary investigation is not required under Sec. 8 Rule 112, and when
the preliminary investigation is required and has been conducted, the grounds not being
meritorious
A Motion to suspend the Arraignment If motion is based on grounds not stated in Sec. 11, Rule
116
WHEN JUDGMENT BECOMES FINAL [LAWS] – As a general rule, judgment becomes final after:
AUTHORITY OF THE EXECUTIVE JUDGE AND VICE-EXECUTIVE JUDGE RE SEARCH WARRANTS IN MANILA AND QUESZON
CITY [GLHF-DT] – Executive Judges of the RTC’s of Manila and Quezon City may issue search warrants outside their
territorial jurisdiction for the following crimes:
G Illegal Gambling
L Anti-Money Laundering Act
H Heinous crimes
F Illegal possession of Firearms
D Dangerous Drugs
T Violation of Tariff and Customs Code
LIMITATIONS OF SEARCH INCIDENTAL TO LAWFUL ARREST [DaUP] – The search is limited to the following:
VENUE (CYBERCRIME WARRANTS) [CDO] – Criminal actions for violation of RA10175 shall be filed before a cybercrime
court of the province or city where:
AUTHORITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES UNDER A WARRANT TO INTERCEPT COMPUTER DATA [SuRe-LiMo]
– WICD authorizes law enforcement authorities to:
INFERENCE OF GUILT ARISING FROM POSSESSION OF RECENTLY STOLEN GOODS [ARPU] – The doctrinal rule is that
before an inference of guilt arising from possession of recently stolen goods can be made, the following basic facts need
to be proved by the prosecution:
REQUISITES OF CIRCUMSTANCTIAL EVIDENCE [M FaC] – For circumstantial evidence to suffice to convict an accused, the
following requisites must concur:
Fa The Facts from which the inferences are derived are proven
C The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a Conviction beyond
reasonable doubt
REQUISITES OF ADMISSIBILITY [F/O RAW]
ADMISSIBILITY OF TAPE RECORDINGS [VACCIn PO] – Before a tape recording is admissible in evidence and given
probative value, the following requisites must first be established:
V A showing that the testimony elicited was Voluntarily made without any kind of inducement
A Establishment of the Authenticity and correctness of the recording
C A showing that the recording device was Capable of taking testimony
C A showing that Changes, additions, or deletions have not been made
In Identification of the speakers
NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE DOCTRINE OF CHAIN OF CUSTODY; EXCEPTIONS [JuIn] – As a general rule, non-
compliance is fatal; the accused’s arrest becomes illegal. The following circumstances are the exceptions, where non-
compliance is not fatal and will not make the accused’s arrest illegal nor render the items seized as inadmissible:
DNA TESTING ORDER [BSP POP] – The order for a DNA testing shall not, however, be issued as a matter of course and
from the mere fact that the person requesting for the testing has a legal interest in the litigation. For the order to be
issued:
P The DNA testing has the scientific Potential to produce new information that is relevant to the
proper resolution of the case
O The existence of Other factors, if any, which the court may consider as potentially affecting
the accuracy of integrity of the DNA testing
P There must be a prima facie showing of relationship or Paternity
POST-CONVICTION DNA TESTING [ERR] – A person convicted under a final and executory judgement may still avail
himself of DNA testing. It may be available to (a) the prosecution, or (b) the person convicted by a final and executory
judgement, provided that the following requirements are met:
DATA TO BE CONSIDERED IN ASSESSING THE PROBATIVE VALUE OF DNA EVIDENCE [CHP ASA]
L When the original is Lost or destroyed, or cannot be produced in court, without bad faith on
the part of the offeror
P When the original is in the custody or under the control of the Party against whom the
evidence is offered, and the latter fails to produce it after reasonable notice, or the original
cannot be obtained by local judicial processes or procedures
N When the original consists of Numerous accounts or other documents which cannot be
examined in court without great loss of time and the fact sought to be established from them
is only the general result of the whole
P When the original is a Public record in the custody of a public officer or is recorded in a public
office
C When the original is not closely-related to a Controlling issue
BUSINESS RECORDS AS EXCEPTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE [NKRR] – A memorandum made by electronic, optical or
other similar means is an exception to the hearsay rule provided that the following are shown by the testimony of the
custodian or other qualified witness:
N That it was made at or Near the time of or from transmission or supply of information
K That it was made by a person with Knowledge thereof
R That it was kept in the Regular course or conduct of a business activity
R That such was the Regular practice to make the memorandum, report, record, or data
compilation by electronic, optical or similar means
JUSTIFYING REFORMATION OF WRITTEN INSTRUMENT UPON THE GROUND OF MISTAKE [FAM] – To justify the
reformation of a written instrument upon the ground of mistake, the concurrence of three things is necessary:
WHEN A PRIVATE WRITING REQUIRES AUTHENTICATION; PROOF OF A PRIVATE WRITING [SaGO] – Before any private
document offered as authentic is received in evidence, its due execution and authenticity must be proved by any of the
following means:
S When the genuineness and authenticity of an actionable document have not been Specifically
denied under oath by the adverse party
A Ancient Documents
A When the genuineness and authenticity of the document have been Admitted
N When the document is Not being offered as authentic
HOW A JUDICIAL RECORD IS IMPEACHED [Fr. WaC] – Any judicial record may be impeached by evidence of:
Fr. Fraud in the party offering the record, in respect to the proceedings
QUALIFICATIONS OF A WITNESS; EXCEPTIONS [CTPM] – As a general rule, all persons who can perceive, and perceiving,
can make known their perception to others, may be witnesses; EXCEPT as provided by law or the Rules, such as:
WHEN THE PRIVLEGE (PRVLEGED COMMUNICATION) DOES NOT APPLY [WIND CEBO]
IMPEACHMENT OF ADVERSE PARTY’S WITNESS [CIR] – The adverse party’s witness may be impeached by:
C Contradictory evidence
I Evidence that he/she has made at other times statements Inconsistent with his/her present
testimony. (PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS)
R Evidence that his or her general Reputation for truth, honesty, or integrity is bad
U That compilation is generally Used and relied upon by persons in the same occupation
P That compilation is Published for the use of persons engaged in that occupation
THE SECOND CLASS OF INDEPENDENTLY RELEVANT STATEMENTS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: [SPIIL]
S The Subject matter of the controversy must be a deed, will, contract or other written
instrument, statute, executive order or regulation, or ordinance
D The terms of said documents and the validity thereof are Doubtful and require judicial
construction
A There must be an Actual justiciable controversy
R The issue must be Ripe for judicial determination
N Adequate relief is Not available through other means or other forms of action or proceeding
A??? There must have been no breach of the documents in question;
A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS REQUIRED BEFORE FILING A PETITION FOR CERTIORARI, EXCEPTIONS [QC-
PUL2EDU]
Q Where the Questions raised in the certiorari proceedings have been duly raised and passed
upon by the lower court, or are the same as those raised and passed upon in the lower court
C Where, in a Criminal case, relief from an order of arrest is urgent and the granting of such
relief by the trial court is improbable
P Where the order is a Patent nullity, as where the court a quo has no jurisdiction
U Where there is an Urgent necessity for the resolution of the question and any further delay
would prejudice the interests of the government or of the petitioner or the subject matter of
the action is perishable
L2 Where the proceedings in the Lower court are a nullity for lack of due process
Where the issue raised is one purely of Law or where public interest is involved
E Where the proceeding were Ex parte or in which the petitioner had no opportunity to object
D Where petitioner was Deprived of due process and there is extreme urgency for relief
U Where, under the circumstances, a motion for reconsideration would be Useless
PARTITION; WHO MAY FILE COMPLAINT; PLAINTIFF; EXCEPTIONS [PALTAC] – As a general rule, plaintiff is allowed to
file a petition for partition ANY TIME as the Civil Code provides that NO co-owner shall be obliged to remain in the co-
ownership. The following are the exceptions:
P When the property is NOT subject to a Physical division and to do so would render it
unserviceable for the use which it is unintended
A If a co-owner asserts Adverse title to the property, in which case the period of prescription
runs from such time of assertion of adverse title
L When partition is prohibited by Law
T When co-owners are prohibited by the donor or Testator for a period not exceeding twenty
(20) years
A Existence of an Agreement among co-owners to retain the property undivided for not
exceeding ten (10) years
C When the Condition imposed upon voluntary heirs before they can demand partition has not
yet been fulfilled
M Memoranda
I Interventions
D3 Motion to Dismiss the complaint except on the ground of lack of jurisdiction over the subject
matter, or failure to comply with Section12
Motion to declare the defendant in Default
Dilatory motions for postponement
T Third-party complaints
Re Reply
Ce Petition for Certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition against any interlocutory order issued by the
court
F Acts of a party or a counsel which constitute willful and deliberate Forum shopping
O Offensive personalities towards others
R Refusal to subscribe an affidavit or deposition when lawfully required to do so;
D Disrespect toward the court
C To satisfy the Contributive shares of the devisees, legatees and heirs on possession of the
decedent’s assets
P To enforce Payment of the expenses of partition
E To satisfy the cost when a person is cited for Examination in probate proceedings
REQUISTES BEFORE A WILL PROVED ABROAD WILL BE ALLOWED IN THE PHILIPPINES [L2APD]
L2 The Law on probate procedure of the said foreign country and proof of compliance therewith
The Legal requirements in said foreign country for the valid execution of the will
A The will has been Admitted to probate in such country – due execution of the will in
accordance with foreign laws
P The fact that the foreign tribunal is a Probate court with jurisdiction over the proceedings
D The testator had his Domicile in a foreign country
Within 30 days Failure to render account or make a return Within thirty (30) days after it was due
G Gathering
C Collecting
S Storing of data or information
Regarding
P Person
F Family
H Home
C Correspondence
M Memorandum
E Motion for Extension of time to file return, opposition, affidavit, position paper, and other
pleadings
D2 Motion to Dismiss
Motion to declare defendant in Default
I Intervention
C Petition for Certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition against any interlocutory order
M Memorandum
E Motion for Extension of time to file return, opposition, affidavit, position paper, and other
pleadings
D2 Motion to Dismiss
Motion to declare defendant in Default
I Intervention
C Petition for Certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition against any interlocutory order
WHEN HABEAS CORPUS IS PROPER AS A POST-CONVICTION REMEDY [JED] – As a post-conviction remedy, it may be
allowed when, as a consequence of a judicial proceeding, any of the following exceptional circumstances is attendant:
R That the petitioner has the Right of custody over the minor
W That the rightful custody of the minor is being Withheld from the petitioner by respondent
B That it is to the Best interest of the minor concerned to be in the custody of petitioner and
not that of the respondent
APPEALS IN SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS; JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS FOR WHICH APPEAL MAY BE TAKEN [ALAC-Final] – An
interested person may appeal in special proceedings from an order or judgment rendered by a Court of First Instance or
a Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court, where such order or judgment:
Final Is the Final order or judgment rendered in the case, and affects the substantial rights of the
person appealing unless it be an order granting or denying a motion for a new trial or for
reconsideration