Portfolio Choice & CAPM Explained
Portfolio Choice & CAPM Explained
Model
Students need to note that when working with the ideas developed by the
researchers, we are using the following assumptions:
In the capital market, future cash flows are traded, that is, we are
considering that the sole objective of companies and other market
institutions is to generate cash flows;
All kinds of assets are being traded on the capital market. That is,
from debentures to human capital;
The market is competitive, that is, an investor alone is not able to
affect the price and investors do not group together to affect the price
of an asset. In other words, investors must accept the price that is
defined by the aggregate behavior of economic agents.
The risk of the company’s CEO being accused of murder, is an example of:
Specific risk;
Systematic risk.
The risk of the company’s CEO being accused of murder, is an example of:
Specific risk;
Systematic risk.
Figure: Caption
The risk of Disney losing exclusive rights to the Winnie the pooh stories is
an example of:
Specific risk;
Systematic risk.
The risk of Disney losing exclusive rights to the Winnie the pooh stories is
an example of:
Specific risk;
Systematic risk.
Figure: Caption
Figure: Caption
You do not accept this deal because you can hedge against the
company specific risk by investing in other companies. In addition,
you could purchase shares or other assets issued by a solar energy
company.
XN N
X
var (rp ) = E (( wi ri − E ( wi ri ))2 ) =
i=1 i=1
N N X
N
(4)
X X
wi2 var (ri ) + wh wj Cov (rh ; rj )
i=1 h=1 j̸=h
If the weights are all the same (wi = N1 for all i), then it is possible to
show that Pwhen N → ∞ we have
N PN
var (rp ) = h=1 j̸=h wh wj Cov (rh ; rj ), that is , the individual risks of
the companies would be eliminated, so the result of the diversification
that we saw earlier would be maintained even when we consider that
the asset returns are no longer independent of each other.
N
X
var (rp ) = wi Cov (ri , rp ) =
i=1
N
X vol(ri )vol(rp )
wi Cov (ri , rp ) = (7)
vol(ri )vol(rp )
i=1
N
X
wi vol(ri )vol(rp )Cor (ri ; rp ),
i=1
N
var (rp ) X
= wi vol(ri )Cor (ri ; rp ) = vol(rp ) (8)
vol(rp )
i=1
N
X
vol(rp ) = wi vol(ri ) Cor (ri ; rp ) (9)
Exposition to asset i Specific risk of asset i Common risk
i=1
E (rp ) = 3.4%
Vol(rp ) = 0.053
Contribuição do ativo A = 0.01
(10)
Contribuição do ativo B = 0.054
Contribuição do ativo C = 0.021
Contribuição do ativo D = −0.032
N
X
MáxW E (rp ) = wi E (ri )
i=1
subject to
N N X
N
X X (11)
var (rp ) = wi2 var (ri ) + wh wj Cov (rh ; rj ),
i=1 h=1 j̸=h
N
X
wi = 1
i
The different portfolios that solve the portfolio selection problem from
the previous slide are known as efficient portfolios because they
generate the highest possible return for a given level of risk. And the
set of efficient portfolios forms the efficient frontier;
Markowitz argued that investors will necessarily invest their resources
in an efficient portfolio, because if they did not, they would not be
adequately remunerated for the risk they are assuming, that is, they
would not be rational;
An important point is that Markowitz assumes that all market
investors have the same expectations of return and variance for all
assets.
Figure: Caption
It is important to note that any portfolio that is not on the efficient frontier
is inefficient, ie, there is a portfolio with the same volatility (risk) that can
generate a higher return;
The greater the number of assets in the market, the higher the efficient
frontier will be, because as we have seen, the greater the number of assets in
the portfolio, the greater the possibility of diversification and the lower the
volatility of the portfolio;
The solution to the portfolio selection problem becomes computationally and
analytically more difficult as the number of assets available to invest
increases, because normally the techniques used to solve these problems
involve inverting high-dimensional matrices that are studied in mathematics
courses related to optimization;
The solution of these problems can generate negative weights, that is, an
asset having any i presents wi < 0, the interpretation of this phenomenon
that we will be doing a short selling operation;
Note that the presence of positive and negative weights does not change the
format of the efficient frontier, only the correlation between assets can
change the shape of this curve;
PN
Note that we will always have i=1 wi = 1 = 100%.
Figure: Caption
(Fundação Getulio Vargas - EAESPFinancialOptimal
Strategy)
Portfolio Choice and the Capital Asset Pricing Model 32 / 52
Efficient portfolios - Efficient boundaries with different
correlations
Figure: Caption
Previously, we considered that all assets had risk, that is, Var (ri ) > 0,
now we will introduce a risk-free asset that is characterized by
E (rf ) = rf > 0 and Var (rf ) = 0. With the introduction of a risk-free
asset, we are in fact making it possible for investors to lend and
borrow resources (short selling), that is, economic agents will be able
to leverage themselves to buy shares (margin account operations);
In practice, we consider that the risk-free asset is represented by
government bonds;
Now the return on Pthe portfolio with risk-free assets is given by
N
E (rp ) = wrf rf + i=1 wi E (ri ), where ri represents the active return
with risk i;
Note that the risk-free asset also has var (rf ) = 0 for all i
cor (rf ; ri ) = 0. Thus, the variance of a portfolio in which part of the
resources isPinvested in risk-free PNassets
PNis given by
Var (rp ) = N w
i=1 i
2 var (r ) +
i h=1 j̸=h wh wj Cov (rh ; rj );
PN
Remember that wrf + i=1 wi = 1 = 100%.
Let’s keep the same conditions of the portfolio with risky assets and
the risk-free asset, but now let’s assume that the investor borrows
about 20% of its resources to invest in the risky asset, thus its
expected return and variance are:
120 −20
E (rt ) = 0.2 + 0.1 = 0.22 (17)
100 100
144
Var (rt ) = 0.16 = 0.23 (18)
100
Figure: Caption
Markowitz’s ideas were incorporated into finance theory and into day
to day practices of investors, but researchers began to wonder if all
financial market people behaved the way Markowitz suggests what
the consequences would be for specific assets ?
The researchers then developed the CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing
Model) model to answer this question. Among these researchers, the
contribution of William Sharpe is recorded here.
Figure: Caption
Figure: Caption
E (rp ) − rf
E (ri ) − rf ≥ (vol(ri )Cor (ri ; rp ) ) (21)
Additional risk of investing in asset i vol(rp )
Sharpe Ratio
E (rp ) − rf
E (ri ) − rf = (vol(ri )Cor (ri ; rp ) ) (22)
Additional risk if asset i vol(rp )
(vol(ri )Cor (ri ;rp )
Making βi = vol(rp ) , then we have:
Figure: Caption
(Fundação Getulio Vargas - EAESPFinancialOptimal
Strategy)
Portfolio Choice and the Capital Asset Pricing Model 48 / 52
CAPM - Final remarks
From the equation 23, we were finally able to find a model to explain
the return on individual assets. The CAPM model tells us that the
return on any asset will depend not only on the economy’s risk
premium and the return on the risk-free asset, but also on how much
the asset’s performance is associated with the performance of the rest
of the economy, which is given by βi ;
It is noteworthy that the sensitivity of any portfolio will be given by
the combination of the βi s that make up the portfolio. In other
words, the portfolio P is formed by βp = wA βA + wB βB .
From this, we can see that the investment decision is separated into
two steps: the first is to select the assets that make up the risk
portfolio and the second is to invest in the risk-free asset in order to
reach the risk level tolerated by the investor.
In practice, as it is very difficult for an investor to have consistently
better information than his competitors on the risk portfolio, it will be
interesting for him to apply it in the market portfolio.