Mind-Reading Computer

Staff Writer
Time, July 1, 1974, page 67

The experiment looks like some ingenious test of mental telepathy. Seated inside a small
isolation booth with wires trailing from the helmet on her head, the subject seems deep in
concentration.
She does not speak or move. Near by, a white-coated scientist intently watches a TV screen.
Suddenly, a little white dot hovering in the center of the screen comes to life. It sweeps to the top
of the screen, then reverses itself and comes back down. After a pause, it veers to the right, stops,
moves to the left, momentarily speeds up and finally halts—almost as if it were under the control
of some external intelligence.
In fact, it is. The unusual experiment, conducted at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in
Menlo Park, California, is a graphic display of one of the newest and most dazzling
breakthroughs in cybernetics.* It shows that a computer can, in a very real sense, read human
minds. Although the dot’s gyrations were directed by a computer, the machine was only carrying
the orders of the test subject. She, in turn, did nothing more than think about what the dot’s
movements should be.
Brainchild of SRI researcher Lawrence Pinneo, a 46 year-old neurophysiologist and
electronics engineer, the computer mind-reading technique is far more than a laboratory stunt.
Though computers can solve extraordinarily complex problems with incredible speed, the
information they digest is fed to them by such slow, cumbersome tools as typewriter keyboards
or punched tapes. It is for this reasons that scientists have long been tantalized by the possibility
of opening up a more direct link between human and electronic brains.

Brain Waves
Although Pinneo and others have experimented with computer systems that respond to voice
commands, he decided that there might be a more direct method than speech. The key to his
scheme: the electroencephalograph, a device used by medical researchers to pick up electrical
currents from various parts of the brain. If he could learn to identify brain waves generated by
specific thoughts or commands, Pinneo figured, he might be able to teach the same skill to a
computer. The machine might even be able to react to those commands by, say, moving a dot
across a TV screen.
Pinneo could readily pick out specific commands. But, like fingerprints, the patterns varied
sufficiently from one human test subject to another to fool the computer. Pinneo found a way to
deal with this problem by storing a large variety of patterns in the computer’s memory. When the
computer had to deal with a fresh pattern, it could search its memory for the brain waves most
like it. So far the SRI computer has been taught to recognize seven different commands—up,
down, left, right, slow, fast and stop. Working with a total of 25 different people, it makes the
right move 60% of the time.
Pinneo is convinced that his barely passing grade can be vastly improved. [Note:1] He foresees
the day when computers will be able to recognize the smallest units in the English language—the
40-odd basic sounds (or phonemes) out of which all words or verbalized thoughts can be
constructed. Such skills could be put to many practical uses. The pilot of a high-speed plane or
spacecraft, for instance, could simply order by thought alone some vital flight information for an
all-purpose cockpit display. There would be no need to search for the right dials or switches on a
crowded instrument panel.
Pinneo does not worry that mind-reading computers might be abused by Big Brotherly
governments or overly zealous police trying to ferret out the innermost thoughts of the citizens.
Rather than a menace, he says, they could be a high-civilizing influence. In the future, Pinneo
speculates, technology may well be sufficiently advanced to feed a computer directly back into
the brain. People with problems, for example, might don mind-reading helmets (“thinking caps”)
that let the computer help them untangle everything from complex tax returns to matrimonial
messes. Adds Pinneo: “When the person takes this thing off, he might feel pretty damn dumb.”

——————————
* A word coined by the late computer theorist Norbert Wiener, from the Greek kybernetes for pilot or governor, to
describe the study of the brain and central nervous system as compared with computers.
[Note:1] Pinneoimproved on the success and stated that computers read some thoughts (unspoken words) of subjects
with a “high degree of accuracy and reliability.” See “Lawrence Pinneo,” San Francisco Chronicle, June 28, 1974;
“Persistent EEG Patterns Associated with Overt and Covert Speech,” Lawrence R. Pinneo, Neurophysiology
Program, Menlo Park, California: Stanford Research Institute (SRI), 1975; The People Shapers, Vance Packard,
1977; and Operation Mind Control, Walter Bowart, 1978.
Consider the following excerpt from a letter written November 19, 1976, by Robert L. Gilliat, Assistant General
Counsel for Manpower, Health, and Public Affairs for the Department of Defense: “As indicated in my letter of
November 12, information which I have received from the Advanced Research Projects Agency is to the effect that
the so-called ‘brain wave’ machine, which was the subject of the National Enquirer article . . . is not capable of
reading brain waves of anyone other than a willing participant in the laboratory efforts to develop that particular
device.” — Paul Brodeur, The Zapping of America, New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1977, pp. 298-299.
Development of the technology continued: “Now, at the University of Missouri, two researchers say they’ve
found ‘motor template waves’ associated with about 20 different syllables, … Neurophysiologist Donald York and
speech pathologist Thomas Jensen are now trying to separate a sound-forming component from a meaning
component by comparing the ERP [event-related potential] differences between homonyms (words that sound the
same but have different meanings—for example ate and eight).
A Russian scientist has reportedly isolated specific waves for specific meanings, claiming to have found, for
example, that waves for concepts such as chair, desk, and table are all overlapped by another wave that corresponds
to the word furniture.” — Gary Selden, “Machines that Read Minds,” Science Digest, October 1981, pp. 60-66.