0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views2 pages

Research Docs

Res. Docs.

Uploaded by

SSPL Reports
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views2 pages

Research Docs

Res. Docs.

Uploaded by

SSPL Reports
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Research Documentation

When publishing research, it is important to make documentation available so that readers can
understand the details of the research design that the work reports. This includes all of the technical
details and decisions that could influence how the findings are read or understood. Usually, this will
involve producing a document along the lines of a methodological note or appendix. That document will
describe how a given study was designed and how the design was carried out. The level of detail is in
such a document should be relatively high. This page will describe some common approaches to
compiling this kind of material and retaining the needed information in an organized fashion throughout
the life of a research project.

Read First

Research documentation provides the context to understanding the results of a given research output.

There is no standard form for this documentation, and its location and format will depend on the type of
research output produced.

For academic materials, this documentation often takes the form of a structured methodological
appendix.

For policy outputs or online products, it may be appropriate to include an informative README webpage
or document.

The most important process for preparing this documentation will be retaining and organizing the
needed information throughout the life of the project, so that the team will not have to search through
communications or data archives for small details at publication time.

What to include in research documentation

Research documentation should include all the information that is needed to understand the underlying
design for the research output. This can include descriptions of:

Populations of interest that informed the study

Methods of sampling or other sources of data about selecting the units of observation that were actually
included in the study

Power calculations and pre-analysis plans

Field work, including data collection or experimental manipulation, such as study protocols
and monitoring or quality assurance information

Data collection tools such as survey instruments, search keywords, and instructions or code for API
requests or database queries

Statistical approaches such as definitions of key constructed indicators, corrections or adjustments to


data, and precise definitions of estimators and estimation procedures

Data completeness, including non-observed units or quantities that were planned or "tracking"
information
All of the research documentation taken together should broadly allow a reader to understand how
information was gathered, what it represents, what kind of information and data files to expect, and
how to relate that information to the results of the research. Research documentation is not a complete
guide to data, however; it does not need to provide the level of detail or instructions that would enable
a reader to approach different research questions using the same data.

Documentation will take different forms depending on the information included. Much of it will be
written narrative rather than, for example, formal datasets. Understanding research documentation
should not require the user to have any special software or to undertake any analytical tasks
themselves. Relevant datasets (such as tracking of units of observation over time) might be included
alongside the documentation, but the documentation should summarize in narrative form all the
information from that dataset that is likely to affect the interpretation of the research.

Structuring research documentation as a publication appendix

If you are preparing documentation to accompany the publication of an academic output such as a
working paper or journal article, the most common form of research documentation is a structured
supplemental appendix. Check the journal's publication process for details. Some publishers allow
unlimited supplementary materials to be included in a format such as an author-created document.
These materials may or may not be included under the peer review of the main manuscript and might
only be intended to provide context for readers and reviewers. In this case you should provide complete
information in that material. Other publishers expect all supplementary materials to be read and
reviewed as part of the publication process. In this case you should provide the minimum additional
detail required to understand the research here (since much of the appendix will likely be taken up by
supplementary results rather than documentation), and consider other methods for releasing complete
documentation, such as self-publication on OSF or Zenodo.

Since there is unlimited space and you may have a large amount of material to include in a
documentation appendix, organization is essential. It is appropriate to have several appendices that
cover different aspects of the research. For example, Appendix A may include information about the
study population and data, such as the total number of units available for observation, the number
selected or included for observation, the number successfully included, and descriptive statistics about
subgroups, strata, clusters, or other units relevant to the research. It could be accompanied by a
tracking dataset with full information about the process. Appendix B might include information about an
intended experimental manipulation in one section, and information about implementation, take-up,
and fidelity in a second section. It could be accompanied by a dataset with key indicators. Appendix C
might include data collection protocols and definitions of constructed variables and comparisons with
alternative definitions, and be accompanied by data collection instruments and illustrative figures. Each
appendix should included relevant references. Supplementary exhibits should be numbered to
correspond with the appendix they pertain to. More granular appendices are generally preferable so
that referencing and numbering remains relatively uncomplicated.

There have been many attempts to standardized some of these elements, such as the STROBE and
CONSORT reporting checklists. Journals will let you know if they expect these exact templates to be
followed. Even if they are not required, such templates can still be used directly or to provide inspiration
or structure for the materials you might want to include.

You might also like