* Technical

Services Sekvices
logica
Forecastngt Prediction
NowCasting
Operational
Continued
Analysis * *
* Monitorng Hydro-nmeteoro
Component I
tQaliGed ***
Decision Data
nformatioD

Management
Componentsand Operational
Observation &
National,
Supprt
and
Technology Reqonal
Figure Traned
Services
Ocean
Systerns
Systems Aqenceis
Human
4: and
Note:Various
Study Telecommunication
Resorces Technical
adviceproducts
forecast
Specific
Analysis other
Advisories,
Products
WarningAnaysis
Data
&
Coordination
Mechanisn State
Rublic
Heath
framework
Component 2
components
Services Services
Core
EWS Techncal
Services

analysed informnation
Assessment
tESF Talored Assessment
*impact * Risk *
riskPotetial
Management
Disaster EOC
SDMA
schematic communication
Risk SOP
Operational
Componentsand National
Zstate
are
Reriewof numbered State,
showing Authority
DM.DDMA
Component 3 Agenceis
Farly (as District
in
timescae rsk at
communication
KEmergency
Response
EvacLuation Assessment
Talored ofREk
Geneatian
Products CiHy
the the
Warning text) Kespanders
Emergency
links SerVices EOCCty
in City
the
Systems of
schematic 4 DM
stakeholders
in Component 4
Indlan
Cties across Feedback
Delivery
Service
Loops and
6
the
development
Component 5
Order
FLawErnergy
and Sanitation pronders PublicResponders
NGOS/CBOS Genera Frst
Corporation
Municpal
Transportation Heath
Public r urban Commerce
WateService
&Drarnage
suPPy Iradeond
establishmenit
Media BusinesS Services/ESF
Commnities Emergency
atrisk Authority
CityDM
DistrictDM
Authority
model 2City
USers
EWS

of
EWs
Component G
Table 1: Criteria
development matrix: Crite
0)VIONENT
ORTERIA
State legislation for EWS framework
includes local authority (Urban Local Body)
as an integral part (document, control to
the ULB)

Institutional mechanism lor Local Authorily

(ULB) is an integral part of EWS framework
(document, mandate, implementation)

ULB accorded with the authority to

disseminate warnings (mandate, SOP,
implementation)

Extent of preparedness and prevention

actions evident among state technical and
disaster management agencies (relevant
department DM Plan at state, SOPs, link
from state to city)
S
CoMPONENT 2
NO
CRITERIA
Hotspots identified for potential hazard
impact (identified, mappedand updated)

2, Outreach practice (dissemination of

warning)

Timely dissemination of warnings to

vulnerable groups (residing in slums, high
risk proneareas)

2.4 Arrangement for night-time warning (limited

tofloods, landslides, cyclones,tsunamis)

Media engagement in dissemination of

2:5 warning

Content ofwarning to general public

by local government (ULB) (graphical
26 representation and behavioural content for
taking actions at individual/household and
community levels)
 S. COMPONENT3
NO.
CRITERIA
TECHNICAL AGENCIES

Risk assessment and integrationwith

3.1potential impact assessment (identification,
mapping. integration)

Warning mechanism for geophysical

3.2,1 hazards: Earthquake, Landslide and
Tsunami

Warning mechanism for hydrometeorlogical

hazards: Cyclone, Severe Winds,
3.2.2: Stormsurge, Heatwave,Coldwave, Snow,
Extreme Rainfall, Fluvial Floodand Pluvial
Flood

Warning mechanism for public health

risks: Vector borne diseases, Water
3.2,3 borne diseases and other Communicable
diseases

Availability of technology to nowcast/

3.3.1 forecast of geophysical hazards by
technical agencies
 CoMPONËNT 3
S.
NO. CRITERIA

Availability of technology in nowcast/ H

3.3.2 forecast of hydro-meteorological hazards n

by technical agencies
ar

Su
Disease surveillance system at
(surveillance coverage, collection method, pa
3.3.3
analysis)
dis

Uncertainty in forecast and warning:

Geophysical hazards, Hydro F
3.4 meteorological hazards and Public health no
risks

DISASTER MANGEMENT AGENCY/LOCALAUTHOL

Budaet allocation by the local authority for B

3.5 EWS

3.6 Data availability for operations of EWS

 COMPONENT 3
S.
NO. CRITERIA

3.7 Staffing and capacity within local authority

for operation and maintenance of EWS

3.8 Use of modern technology to disseminate r

warnings

3.9 Redundancy(multi-mode) in
communicalion networks

City Emergency Operations Centre (EOC)

3.10 for housing information related to hazard,
vulnerability and risk
 COME ONENT A
NO
CRITERIA

4.1 Degree of local details incorporated in

warnings

42 Raising awareness about warnings at city

level

Ability of technical agencies and disaster

4.3 management institutions to cater to early
warning products and services to user
specific requirements

4.4 Risk communication

 COMPONENT5

CRITERIA

Extent of coordination between technical

agencies and disaster management
agencies

Extent of links between disaster

management agencies and service
providers

Extent of links between media and disaster

managementagencies
S. COMPONENT. 6
NO.
CRITERIA

6.1. User community's knowledge of early

warning system and its effectiveness

6.2 Extent towhich the warningmechanism

allows for feedback from affected area

6.3 Level of reflection and learning evident

within local authority

6.4 Monitoring, evaluation and targets for

improvement of EWS