Lecture 2: Market Demand and
Income/Substitution Effects
Alfonso Irarrazabal
September, 2023
1
Introduction
Overview
◦ Demand Function
⋄ Normal and Inferior Goods
⋄ Income Offer Curves and Engel Curves
⋄ The Price Offer Curve and the Demand Curve
⋄ Substitute, Complements, and Inverse Demand Function
◦ The Slusky Equation
⋄ Substitution Effect
⋄ Income Effect
2
The Demand Functions
Demand Functions
◦ The consumer’s demand functions give the optimal amounts
of each goods as a function of the prices and income.
◦ We write the demand functions as follows
x1 = x1 (p1 , p2 , m)
x2 = x2 (p1 , p2 , m)
◦ The left hand side represents the quantity demanded, whereas
the right hand side is a function with three arguments.
◦ In today’s lecture we will consider how demand changes when
prices and income change.
3
∆m : Normal and Inferior Goods
◦ For a normal good the demand increases when the income
increases, ie: dx
dm > 0.
1
4
∆m : Inferior Goods
◦ For an inferior good the demand decreases when the income
increases.
5
Income Offer Curves
∆m : Income Offer Curves
◦ We can construct the income offer curve (or income expansion
path) by collecting the demanded bundles when we change
income.
◦ The income expansion path will be positive sloped if the good
is normal.
6
Examples: Perfect Substitutes
◦ When goods are perfect substitutes (p1 < p2 ), the consumer
only consumes good 1.
7
Examples: Perfect Complements
◦ When goods are perfect complements the consumer buy
goods in fixed proportion independent of the prices.
8
Examples: Cobb Douglas
◦ If the utility is u(x1 , x2 ) = x1a x21−a , then the demand for x1 is
x1 = am/p1 .
◦ Both Engel and Income Offer Curves are linear.
9
Examples: Homothetic Preferences
◦ Homothetic preferences implies that if income is tm, then
demand for both goods become tx1 and tx2 .
◦ If consumer has homothetic preferences, then the Engle curve
is linear.
◦ Perfect complements, perfect substitutes and Cobb Douglas
are all homothetic preferences.
10
Examples: Quasilinear Preferences
◦ Quasilinear preferences have special Engel curves.
◦ A Quasi-linear preference can be represented by
u(x1 , x2 ) = v (x1 ) + x2
where v (x1 ) is any function.
◦ The optimality condition (U-max) is given by solving
v ′ (x1∗ ) p1
=
1 p2
Hence, the demand for x1 is independent of income.
◦ And x2∗ = (1/p2 )(m − p1 x1∗ )
11
Examples: Quasilinear Preferences
◦ Quasilinear utility features zero income effect.
12
Price Offer Curves
∆p1 : Ordinary Goods
◦ Suppose we decrease p1 (keeping constant p2 and m). How
does the demand for good 1, x1 , change?
◦ For ordinary goods, when p1 falls the demand x1 increases.
13
∆p1 : Giffen Goods
◦ For Giffen goods, a decrease in the price leads to an decrease
in the quantity demanded.
14
∆p1 : The Price Offer Curve and the Demand Function
◦ The price offer curve results when connecting all the optimal
bundles for different price levels.
◦ The demand function shows the optimal choice of x1 for
different levels of p1 .
15
Offer and Demand Curves : Perfect Substitutes
◦ We fix p2 and track how demand changes when we
decrease/increase the price.
16
Offer and Demand Curves : Perfect Complements
m
◦ Recall the demand function : x1 = p1 +p2
17
Substitutes and Complements
◦ If the demand of good 1 goes up when the price of good 2
goes up then we say that good 1 is a substitute for good 2.
◦ Mathematically,
∂x1
>0
∂p2
◦ Similarly, if the demand of good 1 goes down when the price
of good 2 goes up then we say that good 1 is a complement
for good 2.
◦ Mathematically,
∂x1
<0
∂p2
18
∆p1 : The Inverse Demand Function
◦ The inverse demand function is the demand function viewing
price as a function of quantity.
19
The Slutsky Equation: Substitution
and Income Effects
Substitution and Income Effects
◦ We now study in detail how demand changes when we change
the price of a good.
◦ When the price of a good changes, there are two effects: 1)
the rate at which you exchange one good for another changes
and 2) the total purchasing power of your income also
changes.
◦ Substitution effect: refers to the change in the rate of
exchange between the two goods.
◦ Income effect : refers to the change in demand due to
having more purchasing power.
20
Slutsky Equation: Substitution Effect
◦ If we let the price of good one (p1 ) fall, it means that you
have to give up less of good 2 to buy good 1.
◦ At the same time, if p1 goes down, it means that your money
income will allow you to buy more of good 1.
21
Slutsky Equation: Substitution Effect
◦ When the price of good 1 falls, we consider the case of a
hypothetical income so the consumer can afford the original
bundle.
◦ First, a budget line with the new slope that keeps the old
bundle just affordable (pivoted line) and 2) a shift in income.
22
Slutsky Equation: Substitution Effect
◦ Suppose the consumption bundle (x1 , x2 ) lies on the pivoted
budget line, and that the bundle is just affordable with income
m.
◦ Now suppose the price of good 1 goes up and calculate how
much income is needed, m′ , so the original bundle is just
affordable.
◦ Then, we have
m′ = p1′ x1 + p2 x2
m = p 1 x1 + p 2 x2
◦ Subtracting terms we have
m′ − m = x1 [p1′ − p1 ]
23
Slutsky Equation: Substitution Effect
◦ Equivalently,
∆m = x1 ∆p1
◦ Suppose originally the current consumption of candy is
x1 = 20 and the price goes up from p1 = 4 (nok/piece) to
p1′ = 6.
◦ Then, we have that income will have to increase by
∆m = x1 ∆p1 = 20 × 2 = 40
to make the old consumption (x1 = 20) affordable.
24
Slutsky Equation: Substitution Effect
◦ The optimal choice for the pivotal budget is Y .
◦ The difference between Y and X measures the change in
consumption when prices changed but the purchasing power
remains constant.
25
Slutsky Equation: Substitution Effect
◦ Formally, the substitution effect ∆x1s is the change in demand
for good 1 when prices change from p1 to p1′ and income
increases to m′ to keep the same purchasing power
∆x1s = x1 (p1′ , m′ ) − x1 (p1 , m)
◦ We need to evaluate the demand at two points : (p1′ , m′ ) and
(p1 , m).
◦ The change can be small or large depending on the shape of
the indifference curve.
26
Slutsky Equation: Income Effect
◦ The second stage of the price adjustment occurs when income
shifts keeping relative prices constant.
◦ We now change income from m to m′ keeping prices (p1′ , p2 )
constant.
27
Slutsky Equation: Income Effect
◦ Formally, the income effect ∆x1n is the change in demand for
good 1 when prices change from m to m′ holding the price of
good 1 at p1′
∆x1n = x1 (p1′ , m) − x1 (p1′ , m′ )
◦ The income effect could be positive or negative depending on
whether the good is normal (positive) or inferior (negative).
28
Slutsky Equation: The Total Change in Demand
◦ The total change in demand ∆x1 is the change in demand due
to the change in price, holding income constant,
∆x1 = x1 (p1′ , m) − x1 (p1 , m)
◦ We can break down the total change into two components:
the substitution and income effect.
∆x1 = ∆x1s + ∆x1n
or
x1 (p1′ , m) − x1 (p1 , m) = [x1 (p1′ , m′ ) − x1 (p1 , m)]
+ [x1 (p1′ , m) − x1 (p1′ , m′ )]
29
Slutsky Equation: Rate of Change
◦ Let us define the negative effect, ∆x1m
∆x1m = x1 (p1′ , m′ ) − x1 (p1′ , m) = −∆x1n
◦ The Slutsky identity is then given by
∆x1 = ∆x1s − ∆x1m
◦ If we divide by ∆p1
∆x1 ∆x1s ∆x1m
= −
∆p1 ∆p1 ∆p1
◦ The first term is term is the substitution effect, whereas the
second term is the income effect.
30
Slutsky Equation: Rate of Change
◦ Recall
∆m = x1 ∆p1
or
∆m
∆p1 =
x1
◦ Substitute into the Slutsky equation
∆x1 ∆x1s ∆x1m
= − x1
∆p1 ∆p1 ∆m
This is the Slutsky equation in rate of change.
◦ Written in terms of derivative
∂x1 (p1 , p2 , m̄) ∂x s (p1 , p2 , x¯1 , x¯2 ) ∂x1n (p1 , p2 , m̄)
= 1 + x1
∂p1 ∂p1 ∂m
31
Examples: Perfect Complements
◦ First, notice that substitution effect is zero.
◦ The entire change is due to income effects.
32
Examples: Perfect Substitutes
◦ When goods are perfect substitutes, the entire effect is due to
substitution.
33
Examples: Quasilinear Preferences
◦ A change in income does not affect good 1, so all the change
in demand is due to substitution effects.
34
Another Substitution Effect
◦ Suppose that now, instead of pivoting around the original
bundle, we roll the budget line around the indifference curve.
35
An Example
An Example: Computing Substitution and Income Effects
◦ Suppose a consumer has the following demand function
m
x1 = 10 +
10p1
His income is 1200 per week, and the price of milk is 30 per
liter.
◦ His demand for milk is
1200
x1 = 10 + = 10 + 4 = 14
10 × 30
liters per week.
◦ Now suppose the price of milk falls to $20 per liter. Then, the
demand increases to x1 = 10 + (1200/(10 × 20)) = 16 liters
per week.
36
An Example : Substitution Effect
◦ Compute the the level of income to make the old bundle
affordable
∆m′ = x1 ∆p1′ = 14 × (−10) = −140
◦ Thus, the new income is m′ = m + ∆m = 1200 − 140 = 1060.
◦ We can compute
1060
x1 (p1′ , m′ ) = 10 + = 15.3
10 × 20
◦ Hence, the substitution effect is
∆x1s = x1 (p1′ , m′ ) − x1 (p1 , m) = 15.3 − 14 = 1.3
37
An Example : Income Effect
◦ The income effect is
∆x1n = x1 (p1′ , m) − x1 (p1′ , m′ )
◦ We need to calculate
1200
x1 (p1′ , m) = 10 + = 16
10 × 20
◦ Hence, the income effect is
∆x1n = 16 − 15.3 = 0.7
◦ The total demand effect is
∆x1 = 1.3 + 0.7 = 2.
38