0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views31 pages

Vehicle Design Architectures Explained

The document discusses different vehicle design architectures including tubular chassis, subchassis and body, and unitized body. It then covers various factors that influence vehicle design such as structural requirements, loads, durability, crash tests, and materials.

Uploaded by

Daniel Bear
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views31 pages

Vehicle Design Architectures Explained

The document discusses different vehicle design architectures including tubular chassis, subchassis and body, and unitized body. It then covers various factors that influence vehicle design such as structural requirements, loads, durability, crash tests, and materials.

Uploaded by

Daniel Bear
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

DESIGN ARCHITECTURES

 Vehicle design classification according to its structure:

– Tubular chassis (space frame)

– Subchassis (frame) and body

– Unitized body, unibody, BIW


TUBULAR CHASSIS
 The chassis provides almost all the structural resistance.
 Body panels contribute very little to the vehicle structure. They
can be made of almost any material with good durability (e.g.:
plastic).
 Examples:
– Chevrolet Corvette C4

– Saturn vehicles (GM)

– Pontiac Fiero (GM)

– Ref.: SAE Paper 885134 - The Birth of the Spaceframe at GM

– Competition vehicles (touring cars, formula cars)


SUBCHASSIS AND BODY
 The body is mounted over the frame along the vehicle. Usually
elastomers are used for the body mounting, isolating it from
the road inputs.
 Depending on the design:
– The frame is the main structural member. E.g.: heavy trucks.

– Both the frame and the body compose the vehicle structure. E.g.: SUV

 Characteristics:
– The weight is higher than the ideal minimum.

– The floor of the vehicle is generally higher.

– Better load capacity.


UNIBODY

 Unibody layouts use semimonocoque structures.

– Monocoque structures: structures formed by shells, which cannot take

high compression loads.

– Semimonocoque structures: use structural members which distribute the

loads to the outer shell, taking compression loads and bending moments.
UNIBODY
 A semimonocoque structure uses an inner frame and exterior
panels which provide structural resistance.
 The frame does not usually occupy the vehicle total length.
 Subframes are generally used in order to support the
suspension components.
 Characteristics:
– Efficient structure.

– The floor of the vehicle can be located in a lower position.

– Load capacity is lower compared to a vehicle that uses a frame.


DESIGN FACTORS
 Packaging  NVH

 Structural requirements  Materials

 Service loads  Manufacturing

 Durability  Weight

 Crash tests  Cost

 Frequency response
STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS
 Global requirements:
– Global torsional and bending stiffness

– Global torsional and bending natural frequencies

– Intrusion resistance in a front / lateral / rear crash

– Roof crushing resistance

 Local requirements:
– Joints stiffness and resistance

– Local natural frequencies (e.g.: floor panel)

– Local compliances (e.g.: body mountings to the structure)


GLOBAL TORSIONAL AND BENDING
STIFFNESS
 They measure how globally stiff is the structure.

– They are closely related to the vehicle roll stiffness and how this roll

stiffness is distributed in between the front and rear ends.

– They are related to the structure vibration modes.

 Typical ranges (see spreadsheet):

– Torsional stiffness: 2000 to 60000 N-m/degree

– Bending stiffness: 3500 to 20000 N/mm


Ford Focus 5p - 17.9 kN-m/° Ford Focus 3p - 19.6 kN-m/°

Volvo S60 - 20 kN-m/° Volvo S80 - 18.6 kN-m/°

Alfa 159 – 31.4 kN-m/° Bugatti Veyron – 60 kN-m/°


Opel Astra – 12 kN-m/° BMW E46 Coupe (asientos plegables) 12.5 kN-m/°

BMW E46 Sedan (asientos fijos) 18 kN-m/°


VW Fox - 17.9 kN-
m/° (asientos plegables) 13 kN-m/°

Land Rover Freelander 2 – 28 kN-m/° BMW E46 Wagon (asientos plegables) 14 kN-m/°
GLOBAL TORSIONAL AND BENDING
STIFFNESS
SERVICE LOADS

 The loads applied to the models are simplifications of the complex


events that occur in reality.
 Load estimation generally begins with instrumented vehicles
operating in public roads.
 Geographic regions.
 Tests are adjusted to proving grounds in order to correlate them to
public roads testing data.
 OEM homologated testing, individual load factors (based on previous
successful designs).
SERVICE LOADS
LOAD CASES
 Symmetric vertical – bending over the Y axis
 Asymmetric vertical – torsion over the X axis and bending over the Y axis
 Pure torsion over the X axis
 Longitudinal loads:
– Acceleration, acceleration with towing
– Braking
– Obstacles

 Lateral loads:
– Maximum lateral force (lateral sliding over the tires)
– Kerbs
– Front/rear distribution of lateral load

 Loads combination – superposition principle


 Local loads cases (e.g.: door slam)
 Crash cases
DURABILITY

 Required service life


 Metal fatigue
 Fracture
 Dent resistance
– Define requirements for the exterior panels thickness

 Corrosion
– Affects fatigue life

– Requires accelerated testing


CRASH TESTS

 Requirementes for crash tests:


– Front impact – FMVSS 208

– Offset impact

– Side impact standard – FMVSS 214

– Roof crush resistance – FMVSS 216

– Fuel system integrity – FMVSS 301

 FMVSS – Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards


– http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/rules/import/fmvss/
FREQUENCY RESPONSE / NVH

 The global and local vibration modes affect the vehicle ride

and its NVH (noise, vibration and harshness) behavior.

 We must ensure that these modes do not align with excitations

coming from the powertrain assembly.


MATERIALS - REFERENCES

 Functional Design of Lightweight Body-in-White Structures -

BMW

 UltraLight Steel Auto Body – Final Report

 The All Aluminum Auto Body – A Study Based on The Porsche

928
MATERIALS
 According to BMW, there is no more monoculture in terms of

materials for automotive structures.

 The most suitable material will be used in each part of the

vehicle based on an integrated approach: from first idea

through to recycling.

 Due to its performance to costs relationship steel will remain a

major material in the body structure.


Pilar C: E E
Rigidez Pandeo
 
Piso cabina:
y
Abollado

Túnel: 3
Fijación de
asientos: y Rigidez a flexión
E
Resistencia  
BMW Hybrid Design
UltraLight Steel Auto Body (ULSAB)
Future Reference Structure
Benchmark Performance
Performance
11531 13000
Static Torsional Rigidity Static Torsional Rigidity
Nm/deg Nm/deg
Static Bending Rigidity 11902 N/mm Static Bending Rigidity 12200 N/mm
First Body Structure First Body Structure
38 Hz 40 Hz
Mode Mode
Mass 271 kg Mass 250 kg

Performance ULSAB Difference

Static Torsional Rigidity


20800 +80%
[Nm/deg]
Static Bending Rigidity [N/mm] 18100 +52%

First Body Structure Mode [Hz] 60 +58%

Mass [kg] 203 -25%


Seel structure - Stiffness
Aluminum structure
Panel
Extrusion
Casting

Laser seam
Aluminum structure

Data:
Weight: 210 kgf
Welding: 99 m
Rivets: 782
Studs: 308
MANUFACTURE

 Forming

– Steel stamping

– Continuous rails

– Hydroforming - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroforming

 Welding

 Adhesive bonding
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
METHODS
 Analytical:
– Rigid body simulations (ADAMS, DADS, AUTOSIM)

– Lineal FEA (NASTRAN, ANSYS, …)

– Non-lineal FEA (ABAQUS, ADINA, …)

– Statistical Energy Analysis (SEA)

 Empirical:
– Static testing: torsional stiffness, bending stiffness

– Crash testing

– Modal analysis

– Laser holography

You might also like