POSITION PAPER

The notion of beauty in innovative works has attracted and driven inquiries into thought across
the world of art history. A crucial concern that has persisted throughout this investigation is whether
the worth of an artwork is simply determined by its function, whether utilitarian, symbolic, or others.
This timeless dispute is at the foundation of an unending noteworthy argument, one that calls into
question our perceptions of aesthetics and the value of art in the lives we lead. While recognizing the
indisputable importance that an artwork's usefulness has on our impression of its nature, this paper
asserts that function cannot be an independent determiner of art. Art's appeal cultivates from a complex
interaction of components such as style, cultural messages, artistic relevance, and personal
interpretation, transcending the constraints established by its utilitarian use.

The beauty of art is certainly complex, expanding beyond the boundaries of its intended
purpose. One significant justification for this assumption is the tremendous variety of art designs and
aesthetics throughout history. Take into account Leonardo da Vinci's timeless painting, "Mona Lisa."
Even though it is a portrait, its lasting appeal resides not just in the depictions of the person, but also in
its exceptional technique, mysterious smile, and ambiguous background. This artwork originally served
as a portrait, yet its reputation as an irreplaceable masterpiece demonstrates how art can transcend its
initial function. Aside from that, the cultural relevance of art extends beyond function, since it is
frequently used as an expression of one's identity, history, and past significance. The Taj Mahal, a
mausoleum, combines tremendous visual beauty with its symbolic purpose as a love monument. Its
greatness and exquisite architectural features arouse adoration much beyond its original function,
evoking a beautiful union of design and significance. Real-life examples also demonstrate that the
beauty of an artwork cannot be determined just by its usefulness. Consider how people form their own
associations with art, and how a seemingly harmless visualization can stir up strong feelings or
experiences. The decorative object in a home tends to be selected for the associations that it evokes and
the ambiance it produces rather than for its practical utility.

Furthermore, the idea of having an artistic goal demonstrates that the creator's purpose often
transcends the momentary purpose of an artwork. Keep in mind Vincent van Gogh's iconic painting,
"Starry Night." While it depicts an illustration of a starry night sky, it also reflects van Gogh's feelings
and his state of mind at the time of its creation. His use of swirling patterns and vibrant hues provides a
feeling of turmoil and beauty that transcends the representation of stars. Recognizing the artist's
intention helps us to acknowledge the artwork's profundity of emotion as well as its visual appeal,
indicating that function is only one component of its total beauty. In addition to these examples, the
fundamental meaning of art extends beyond its basic functioning, a point of view shared by renowned
philosophers such as Leo Tolstoy, who stressed art's ability to evoke universal emotions and build
cross-cultural ties. Immanuel Kant suggested that aesthetic judgments need an objective examination of
an artwork's inherent form and beauty. Allen Weinstein, on the other hand, emphasized the always-
changing perception of art throughout time, cultures, and individuals. These opinions agree that the
beauty of artwork stems from its ability to elicit emotional responses, attract disinterested
contemplation, and elicit dynamic interpretations, eventually transcending the constraints imposed by
utilitarian uses.

In contrast to the notion that art is a varied and complex thing, another viewpoint holds that art
is essentially defined by its function. According to this particular point of view, art is characterized
primarily by its practical functions. The historical usage of art in religious situations is one piece of
evidence supporting this viewpoint. Throughout history, art has frequently been made with a clear and
distinctive aim in mind: to fulfill religious or spiritual reasons. Take into consideration the stunning
stained glass windows prevalent in church structures throughout the globe. These pieces of art were
carefully produced to reflect the Bible's narratives, religious personas, and divine significance. Their
primary objective was to impart religious lessons and instill awe and devotion among worshipers. The
elaborate motifs and brilliant colors were selected with care to express spiritual messages and improve
the religious experience. The role of art inside a religious environment completely determines its shape
and substance in this context.

In conclusion, art is a limitless domain that stretches far beyond functional boundaries. It has
the ability to transcend practicality and transport us to a realm of innovation, creative thinking, and
interest. Art has no boundaries, allowing us to delve into the depths of our ideas, feelings, and
experiences. It acts as a conduit for personal and societal reflection, disputing norms, and pushing
limits. Humans can express complicated concepts, prompt thinking, and elicit powerful emotions
through art. Its impact extends much beyond the physical sphere, leaving an unforgettable imprint on
our emotional states and thoughts. Art directs humans that the intangible has beauty and purpose and
that the avenues for expression and interpretation are limitless.