11th Notes
11th Notes
1.EXTINCTION IN LEARNING:
Extinction refers to the gradual weakening and eventual disappearance of a learned response. This
happens when the reinforcement (the reward or consequence that strengthens the behavior) is removed
from the situation in which the response was previously reinforced. Example in Classical Conditioning:
In classical conditioning (like Pavlov’s experiment with dogs), if the conditioned stimulus (CS, e.g., a
bell) is not followed by the unconditioned stimulus (US, e.g., food), the conditioned response (CR, e.g.,
salivation) will gradually weaken and eventually stop. Example in Operant Conditioning: In operant
conditioning (like Skinner’s experiments with rats), if a behavior (e.g., pressing a lever) is no longer
followed by a reward (e.g., food pellets), the learned behavior will slowly diminish and ultimately
disappear.
2. Resistance to Extinction: Even after reinforcement is removed, the learned response does not
disappear immediately. It continues to occur for some time, showing what is known as "resistance to
extinction." This means the response persists even without reinforcement.
Gradual Reduction: Over time, with more and more trials where the behavior is not reinforced, the
strength of the response gradually diminishes until it eventually stops.
3.Factors Affecting Resistance to Extinction:
Number of Reinforced Trials: The more a behavior has been reinforced (rewarded) during the learning
process, the more resistant it is to extinction. In other words, if a behavior has been reinforced many
times, it will take longer for that behavior to disappear once reinforcement is removed.
Stabilization of Performance: When a behavior has reached its highest level of performance due to
many reinforced trials, it stabilizes. After this point, adding more reinforcement does not significantly
increase the strength of the response.
Effect of Excessive Reinforcement: Interestingly, beyond a certain point, if you continue to reinforce the
behavior excessively, the resistance to extinction may actually decrease. This means that too much
reinforcement can make the learned behavior easier to extinguish.
Amount of Reinforcement: If the amount of reinforcement (e.g., the number of food pellets) given
during learning is high, the resistance to extinction is lower. This means the behavior will be more easily
extinguished.
Delay in Reinforcement: If there is a delay between the behavior and the reinforcement during the
learning phase, the learned behavior becomes more resistant to extinction. This means that the longer the
delay in receiving reinforcement, the harder it is to extinguish the behavior.
4.Continuous vs. Intermittent Reinforcement:
Continuous Reinforcement: If reinforcement is given after every single trial during the learning process,
the learned behavior becomes less resistant to extinction. This means the behavior will stop more quickly
once reinforcement is removed.
Intermittent or Partial Reinforcement: If reinforcement is given only sometimes (intermittently) during
learning, the behavior becomes more resistant to extinction. This means the behavior will persist longer
after reinforcement is removed.
GENERALIZATION AND DISCRIMINATION
Generalization occurs when an organism responds to a new stimulus that is similar to the original
conditioned stimulus (CS). In other words, the learned response is triggered by stimuli that resemble the
one originally used in conditioning.
Example in Classical Conditioning: Imagine an organism (like a dog) has been conditioned to salivate
(conditioned response, CR) when it hears a specific sound, such as a bell (conditioned stimulus, CS).
After conditioning is well-established, if a similar sound, like the ringing of a telephone, is played, the
dog might also start to salivate. This is generalization—the dog is responding similarly to different but
related stimuli (the bell and the telephone sound).
Example in Operant Conditioning: Consider a child who has learned that a particular jar in the kitchen
contains sweets. The child has learned to find the jar and get sweets, even when the mother is not around.
This is a learned operant behavior. Now, if the sweets are moved to a different jar of another size and
shape in a different location, and the child still finds and opens the new jar to get the sweets, this is also
generalization. The child is applying the learned behavior to a new but somewhat similar situation.
Summary: Generalization is when a learned response (like salivating or finding sweets) occurs in
response to stimuli that are similar to the original stimulus that was used in learning. This means the
organism is responding similarly to different but related stimuli.
2. Discrimination:
Definition: Discrimination is the opposite of generalization. It occurs when an organism learns to
differentiate between similar stimuli and responds only to the original stimulus, not to others that are
similar. Example: Suppose a child has been conditioned to be afraid of a person with a long mustache and
wearing black clothes. This is the conditioned stimulus. If the child sees another person who is also
wearing black clothes but has a beard instead of a mustache, the child may still show signs of fear. This is
generalization because the child is reacting to a similar stimulus. However, if the child sees a different
person who is wearing grey clothes and is clean-shaven, and the child does not show fear, this is an
example of discrimination. The child is distinguishing between the different stimuli (black clothes with a
mustache vs. grey clothes and clean-shaven) and only responding with fear to the original or very similar
stimuli.
Summary: Discrimination is when a learned response (like fear) is triggered only by the original stimulus
and not by similar stimuli. It involves recognizing differences between stimuli and responding only to the
specific one that was associated with reinforcement or conditioning.
SPONTANEOUS RECOVERY:
1. Spontaneous Recovery:
What It Is: Spontaneous recovery is the phenomenon where a learned response that was thought to be
"extinguished" (or eliminated) suddenly reappears after some time has passed.
2. Learning and Extinction:
Initial Learning: Imagine an organism (like an animal) that has learned to perform a certain behavior
(like pressing a lever) because it gets a reward (like food) when it does so. This learned behavior is strong
because of the reinforcement (the reward). Extinction: Now, if the reinforcement (reward) is removed—
meaning that the animal no longer gets food when it presses the lever—the learned behavior will
eventually weaken and stop. This process is called extinction.
3. Question After Extinction: The Doubt: After extinction, you might wonder: Is the learned behavior
really gone forever? Will the animal never press the lever again if the situation arises?
4. Spontaneous Recovery Occurs:
Reappearance of Behavior: Research shows that after some time has passed since the extinction, the
learned behavior can suddenly return. This means that the animal might start pressing the lever again even
though it stopped doing so before. This return of the behavior is what we call spontaneous recovery.
5. Dependence on Time Lapse:
Impact of Time: The amount of spontaneous recovery—the strength of the reappearance of the behavior
—depends on how much time has passed since extinction:
Longer Time: If a long time has passed since the behavior was extinguished, the recovered behavior
might be stronger.
Shorter Time: If only a little time has passed, the recovery might be weaker or may not happen at all
6.Natural Occurrence:
Happens Naturally: The recovery of the behavior happens on its own, without any additional
reinforcement or training. It’s like the behavior was temporarily "forgotten" but not completely erased.
Illustration: The paragraph mentions a figure (Fig. 6.3) that would typically show how spontaneous
recovery occurs. It likely illustrates that after a period of no response (extinction), the behavior reappears
when the stimulus (CS) is presented again.
OBSERVATIONAL LEARNING
Observational learning is a process by which individuals learn by observing others. This concept was
previously known as imitation, but it has been expanded and studied in more detail by Albert Bandura and
his colleagues, who called it "observational learning" or "social learning." Let's break down the concept
and the details provided in the text:
1. What is Observational Learning? Observational learning occurs when an individual learns new
behaviors or information by watching others, rather than through direct experience. It's often referred to
as social learning because it typically involves learning social behaviors. Examples in Everyday Life:
People often learn how to behave in various situations by observing others. For instance, children learn
how to interact in social settings by watching their parents or peers. They might also pick up new
behaviors from media, such as television shows or advertisements.
2. Modeling: This is the term used for the process of learning through observation. When someone
observes another person (called the model) and then imitates their behavior, they are engaging in
modeling. Fashion and Media Example: A common example of modeling in society is how people
follow fashion trends. Fashion designers use models (tall, attractive individuals) to showcase their
clothes. People see these models in advertisements or fashion shows and then imitate their style. This is
observational learning in action.
3. Bandura’s Experiments
Bandura’s Studies: Albert Bandura conducted several experiments to study observational learning. One of
his famous experiments involved showing children a short film featuring a boy interacting aggressively
with a large doll called "Bobo."
The Experiment Setup:
The film showed a boy behaving aggressively towards the Bobo doll—hitting, kicking, and throwing it.
Bandura created three versions of the film:
In the first version, children saw the boy being rewarded and praised by an adult for his aggressive
behavior. In the second version, children saw the boy being punished for his aggressive behavior. In the
third version, children saw the boy’s aggressive behavior but with no consequences—no reward or
punishment.
Observation and Results: After watching one of the versions of the film, the children were placed in a
room with similar toys, including a Bobo doll. Their behavior was secretly observed: Children who saw
the boy being rewarded were the most aggressive, imitating the boy’s behavior. Children who saw the boy
being punished were the least aggressive, indicating they learned that aggressive behavior could have
negative consequences. Children who saw no consequence showed aggression, but not as much as those
who saw the reward.
Conclusion: Bandura’s experiment demonstrated that while children can learn behaviors just by
observing others, their performance of those behaviors is influenced by what happens to the model
(reward or punishment).
4. Observational Learning in Children
Children as Observers: Children often observe the behaviors of adults at home and in social situations.
They then imitate these behaviors during play. For example, they might play games that involve
mimicking social ceremonies, such as weddings or birthday parties, or roles like police officers or
parents.
Learning Social Behaviors: Through observational learning, children acquire important social behaviors
like how to dress, groom themselves, and behave in social contexts. They also develop personality traits
such as politeness, aggressiveness, or diligence by observing the adults around them.
5. Broader Implications
Personality Development: Observational learning is not just about mimicking actions; it also plays a
crucial role in shaping a child’s personality. Traits like aggressiveness, prosocial behavior (such as
helping others), and even laziness can be learned by observing others.
COGNITIVE LEARNING:
Cognitive learning is a concept where learning is understood in terms of mental processes, rather than just
behavior. Unlike classical and operant conditioning, which focus on the association between stimuli and
responses (S-R and S-S connections), cognitive learning emphasizes the changes in the learner's
knowledge. This form of learning manifests in processes like insight learning and latent learning.
1. Insight Learning: Insight Learning is a type of cognitive learning where an individual suddenly
realizes how to solve a problem. It was first demonstrated by Wolfgang Köhler, a psychologist who
conducted experiments with chimpanzees.
Köhler’s Experiment:
Setup: Köhler placed chimpanzees in an enclosed area where food was deliberately kept out of their
immediate reach. He also provided tools like poles and boxes within the enclosure.
Observation: The chimpanzees explored the area and then, suddenly, without any prior trial-and-error,
figured out how to use the tools to get the food. For example, they might stand on a box to reach a banana
or use a pole to bring the food closer.
Insight: This sudden realization or “aha moment” where the chimpanzee figured out how to use the tools
to get the food is what Köhler termed as insight learning.
Characteristics of Insight Learning:
Suddenness: The solution comes suddenly after a period of no apparent progress.
Repetition: Once the insight is achieved, the solution can be easily repeated when faced with the same
problem.
Generalization: The learned solution can be applied to similar situations, showing that it’s not just a
specific response to a particular situation but a broader understanding of the relationship between the
tools (means) and the goal (getting the food).
2. Latent Learning
Latent Learning is another form of cognitive learning where an individual learns something but doesn’t
demonstrate this learning until there is a reason to do so, such as when a reward is provided.
Tolman’s Experiment:
Setup: Edward Tolman, a psychologist, conducted an experiment using rats and a maze. He placed two
groups of rats in a maze to explore:
Group 1: These rats found food at the end of the maze, which served as a reward. They quickly learned
to navigate the maze to reach the food.
Group 2: These rats didn’t find any food at the end of the maze and didn’t show any obvious signs of
learning the maze.
Observation: When Group 2 rats were later given food as a reward, they navigated the maze just as
efficiently as the rats in Group 1. This indicated that Group 2 had learned the layout of the maze during
their earlier explorations but hadn’t shown it because there was no incentive.
Cognitive Map: Tolman suggested that the rats in Group 2 had formed a cognitive map, which is a
mental representation of the maze’s layout. This cognitive map allowed them to quickly find their way
through the maze once they were motivated by the reward.
VERBAL LEARNING:
Verbal Learning is a specific type of learning that involves acquiring knowledge and associating it with
words. Unlike conditioning, verbal learning is unique to humans and involves learning about objects,
events, and their characteristics primarily through words. Psychologists study verbal learning using
various methods in laboratory settings, focusing on how individuals learn and recall verbal material.
Methods Used in Studying Verbal Learning
1. Paired-Associates Learning
What It Is: This method is similar to stimulus-stimulus (S-S) conditioning and stimulus-response (S-R)
learning. It’s used to study how people learn to associate pairs of words, which can be particularly helpful
in learning a foreign language.
How It Works: Preparation: A list of paired words (paired-associates) is created. Each pair has a
stimulus term (the first word) and a response term (the second word). These pairs can be from the same
language or two different languages. Example: The stimulus could be a nonsense syllable (like "CAV"),
and the response could be an English noun (like "cat").
Learning Process: First, both the stimulus and response words are shown together, and the learner is
instructed to remember them. In subsequent trials, only the stimulus word is presented, and the learner
must recall the corresponding response word. If the learner fails, the correct response is shown, and this
process repeats until the learner can recall all the pairs correctly without any errors.
Measure of Learning: The number of trials it takes for the learner to correctly recall all pairs without
errors is used as a measure of how well they’ve learned.
2. Serial Learning
What It Is: This method is used to study how people learn lists of verbal items (like words) and the
processes involved in this learning.
How It Works: Preparation: Lists of verbal items (such as nonsense syllables, familiar or unfamiliar
words, or related words) are prepared.
Learning Process: The entire list is presented to the learner, who must then produce the items in the
exact order as they appear in the list.
Serial Anticipation Method: In the first trial, the first word on the list is shown, and the learner must
recall the second word. If the learner fails, the second word is shown. The learner must then recall the
third word, and so on.This continues until the learner can correctly recall the entire list in the correct order
without making any mistakes.
Purpose: This method helps to understand how individuals remember sequences of information and what
strategies they use to do so.
3. Free Recall
What It Is: This method studies how people recall words from a list, without having to follow any
specific order.
How It Works: Presentation: Participants are shown a list of words, one at a time, at a fixed rate of
exposure. These words can be related or unrelated.
Recall Process: After the list is presented, the participant must recall and say as many words from the list
as they can, in any order. The order of word presentation changes in each trial.
Purpose: This method is used to study how people organize and store information in their memory. It It
often shows that words presented at the beginning (primacy effect) or the end (recency effect) of the list
are easier to remember than words in the middle.
Key Points:
Paired-Associates Learning focuses on associating pairs of words.
Serial Learning examines how people learn and recall sequences of items in a specific order.
Free Recall explores how people remember and recall information in any order, revealing patterns in
memory storage and retrieval.