Housing Conflicts and Policies in India
Housing Conflicts and Policies in India
URBAN DESIGN
SEM IX
CONFLICTS IN HOUSING
MUMBAI
1951
affordable housing solutions to industrial workers
laborers in plantations, ensuring their welfare
and those belonging to the economically
and rights.
weaker sections of society in India.
1974
Some of the points that are related to housing are:
1. Provisions for house site
2. Assistance for construction of house
3. Indira Awas Yojana
4. Housing for economically weaker section
5. Lower income group housing
First specialised mortgage company in India and was
promoted by the Industrial Credit and Investment
Corporation of India. It is a major provider of finance for
housing in India.
3. Limitations :
- Lacked assessment of income required for basic housing.
- Did not consider the need for employment generating sufficient
income for loans or rental space.
Devolved responsibility for numerous functions including urban
poverty alleviation, slum upgrading, housing, management of
urban services and protection of weaker sections to urban
local bodies (ULBs).
Scarcity of Master-plan
developed and restraints
Lack of cheaper
encumbrance-free Lower purchasing
loans
urban land capacity
Absence of
viable rental
market
Growing informal
housing options Inaccessible
formal lending
Lesser
options
percolation of
subsidy
Increased cost of benefits
construction
PRADHAN MANTRI AWAS YOJANA (URBAN)
Launch year: 2015
To provide financial
Assistance to individual assistance to EWS houses
eligible families belonging being built in various
Slum Redevelopment using Interest subvention on
to EWS categories to either partnership models by
land as a resource with home loans taken by
construct new house or to States/UTs/Cities including
private participation eligible urban poor
enhance existing houses the private sector and
on their own industries
PMAY (U) - STATISTICS
REPORT OF YEARS 2015 - 2022
33
Alternate technologies identified
Benficiary Contribution
49%
CONCERNS
PERTAINING ISSUES
CITY EXAMPLES:
UNAVAILABILITY LACK OF
OF BUILDING ECONOMIC
HIGH COST Cause: Poor Land-use planning
MATERIALS EFFICICIENCY IN
OF
CITIES
BUILDING
MATERIALS VIENNA
INFRASTRUCTURE SINGAPORE
CONSTRAINTS IN There is a need to increase the
LACK OF AFFORDABLE
DEVELOPMENT Floor Area Ratio (FAR)/ Floor
RENTING MARKET
CONTROL Space Index (FSI)
MANHATTAN
REGULATIONS
HOUSING POLICY EVOLUTION AND IMPACT
Period Focus Method Outcome
1950s- Government-led house building for Central plan targets divided among Insufficient pace to meet housing
1960s disadvantaged groups states; medium-rise apartments, social needs; limited reach to the poor due
housing, rent subsidies to bureaucratic delays, corruption,
and favoritism.
1970s Recognized program inadequacies; Emphasized improving habitability Limited success due to temporary
sought World Bank assistance through 'Slum Improvement improvements and difficulty in
Programmes'; 'Sites and Services' identifying beneficiaries; successful in
program supported by World Bank states like Andhra Pradesh and Tamil
Nadu but faced design and
implementation issues, especially in
land-scarce cities like Mumbai.
1980s Empowerment of slum dwellers with World Bank actively involved; land titles Empowered residents to improve
secure tenancy and infrastructure provided to slum dwellers in some living conditions, but challenges
services states remained in densely populated urban
areas.
Period Focus Method Outcome
1990s Focused on affordable housing for Incentives for private builders through Initial success during real estate
the urban poor; pursued complete development rights and partnership- boom; limited effectiveness post-
slum redevelopment based approaches market burst.
Late 1990s to Developed efficient housing National Housing Bank (NHB) and Benefited middle-income groups;
Early 2000s markets; urban areas seen as Housing and Urban Development failed to address the needs of the
economic growth engines Corporation (HUDCO) provided loans poor due to high land and
to homebuilders; tax incentives for construction costs in cities like
homebuyers Mumbai and restrictive development
regulations.
Key Acts and Programs Description Outcome
Early Government-led Focused on public housing; faced bureaucratic and Limited reach and impact; ineffective in
Housing Programs corruption issues addressing full housing needs.
Slum Improvement Aimed at improving habitability; temporary improvements Limited success; difficulty in beneficiary
Programmes identification.
Sites and Services Provided basic infrastructure and secure tenancy; supported Empowered some slum dwellers; varied success
Program by World Bank by region; issues in land-scarce cities.
Slum Improvement Private builder incentives; redevelopment through Initial success; faced limitations after real estate
Programmes partnerships market downturn.
Slum Improvement Encouraged home ownership through financial support and Benefited middle-income groups; did not
Programmes tax incentives adequately address low-income housing needs.
DIRECT INTERVENTION
Aspect Description
Direct Intervention India has undertaken various programmes for housing provision through five-year plans and independent programmes.
Both Union and state governments, as well as central and state government enterprises, have contributed to housing
provision.
Programmes Undertaken Various programmes have been launched by the government, with contributions from public sector enterprises.
Evaluation and Impact Despite numerous programmes, their success has been limited. Comprehensive evaluation and impact assessment are
missing. General conclusions can be drawn about the reasons for success and failure.
1. Target Group Reach Difficulty in ensuring funds reach target groups. Beneficiaries often became eligible through political, social, and
bureaucratic contacts.
2. Poor Percolation of Poor translation of housing on ground; neglected monitoring of housing units construction led to 'moral hazard'
Benefits problems, benefiting bureaucrats, contractors, and politicians.
3. Inefficient Housing High production costs, long construction periods, and rationing in provision of houses.
Supply
4. Lack of Beneficiary Beneficiaries did not contribute to capital or labor, lacked sense of ownership, and uniform house layouts did not reflect
Participation their needs. Beneficiary participation in design was missing.
STATE
HOUSING
POLICIES
MAHARASHTRA STATE
LAND AQUISITION, REHABILITION MAHARASHTRA STATE HOUSING
MAHARASHTRA SLUM AREAS ACT HOUSING POLICY RENTAL CONTROL ACT
AND RESETTLEMENT ACT POLICY AND ACTION PLAN
(FIRST DRAFT)
MAHARASHTRA STATE
MAHARASHTRA APARTMENT URBAN LAND CEILING MODEL STATE AFFORDABLE
MAHARASHTRA HOUSING ACT HOUSING POLICY
OWNERSHIP ACT AND REGULATION ACT HOUSING ACT
(SECOND DRAFT)
Aspect Description
Aim of the Act To provide for the ownership of an individual apartment and make it
a heritable and transferable property.
Declaration Requirement The sole owner(s) must submit a declaration, which shall be duly
executed and registered to apply the provisions of the Act.
1970
Maharashtra Apartment Ownership
Act Section Description
Section 4 Each apartment, with its share of common areas and facilities, is a
heritable and transferable property.
Purpose of the Act to make better provision for the improvement and clearance of slum
areas and their redevelopment in the State.
Slum Rehabilitation Authority the Act provides for rules and regulations to be followed by the SRA
1971 Cut-off Date for Regularization Changed from January 1, 1995, to January 1, 2000.
Maharashtra Slum Areas Act
Regulations by SRA The Act provides for regulations to be made by the Slum
Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) consistent with this Act.
Powers to Demolish Grants power to the competent authority to demolish illegal dwelling
structures of pre-2000 slums (revised from 1995) and includes penal
liability as per the Slum Protection Bill.
Aspect Description
Context Enacted in response to the ULC Act, which defines the maximum
land ownership limits.
Land Ceiling Enforcement Excess land beyond the ceiling limit is taken over by ULC Authorities.
1976
Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation
Act Industrial land can be exempted by paying 15% of the average
Exemption for Industrial Land
scheduled prices of the exempted land.
Exemption for Agricultural Agricultural land can be exempted by paying a one-time premium
Land of 10% of the current annual planned rates.
Acquisition Norm Only specific types of vacant land in urban agglomerations can be
acquired and held; excess land must be managed or given to
appropriate authorities.
Aspect Description
Prevent Concentration of Prevent the concentration of urban land in a few hands and
Urban Land promote housing for the poor in cities
Artificial Scarcity Large blocks of urban land have stayed locked up, creating an
artificial scarcity.
Discretionary Power Absence of clarity and too much discretionary power given to the
state governments for granting exemptions.
Land Release for Development Compensation provided for the acquired land was very little, leading
to lengthy litigation disputes.
Aspect Description
Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA)
Oversees the rehabilitation of existing slum Purpose of the Act Improve and clear slum areas, protect occupiers from eviction
areas through a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme.
and distress warrants, and establish a Slum Rehabilitation Authority
(SRA).
Powers and Duties of SRA
- Surveying and reviewing current slum
conditions.
Slum Rehabilitation Authority Oversees the rehabilitation of existing slum areas through a Slum
- Formulating rehabilitation schemes. (SRA) Rehabilitation Scheme.
- Implementing the Slum Rehabilitation
Scheme.
- Ownership housing.
- Incremental Housing: Allows owners to pace construction and
make additions or extensions.
- Rental housing: Facilitates rental options for workers, those
2013
Types of Housing Supported preferring not to own, or those who cannot afford ownership
Model state Affordable housing Policy
housing.
- Shelters and other forms of housing: Provides transit homes,
dorms, and hostels to ensure no one is homeless. Addresses the
housing needs of senior citizens, women, students, the physically
and mentally challenged, and SC/ST/OBC and Minorities.
Objective
Provide 1.9 million houses by 2022 focusing on
Economically Weaker Section (EWS), Lower
Income Group (LIG), and Middle Income
Group (MIG).
Aspect Description
Aspect Description
Scope of Policy Extends the redevelopment scheme to suburbs and transit camps,
Aims
Redevelop at least 30,000 houses under
where residents are temporarily relocated during upgrades.
MHADA, with 10,000 units in the suburbs
- Redevelopment of 104 layouts with a Floor Space Index (FSI) of
four.
Redevelopment Details - Developers redeveloping buildings on plots up to 2,000 sq m
receive an FSI of three, which can be increased by one through
Unit Size
Residents in the redeveloped buildings will
premium payments and sharing housing stock with MHADA.
receive units ranging from 300 to 753 sq ft.
Redevelop at least 30,000 houses under MHADA, with 10,000 units
Aims
in the suburbs
Unit Size Residents in the redeveloped buildings will receive units ranging
from 300 to 753 sq ft.
2016
Maharashtra State Housing policy
Anticipated Implementation
Expected to come into force in November
2023.
Policy Focus
Promote affordable housing and sustainable
Aspect Description
accommodation in the state.
2023
Rent Control Act
THE STEPS AND DECISIONS INVOLVED IN THE SLUM REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
Basic Approach Holistic approach of In the last 20 years, only 10% of the slums in Mumbai have been developed.
‘Whole City – All Slums’ Redevelopment is held up for various issues.
Step 1: Survey Complete survey of all slums within Includes number of eligible and non-eligible slum dwellers, tenement density, and
MCGM limit preliminary feasibility. Task to be completed in 6 months by private surveyors.
Step 2: Master Plan Publish master plan after survey Slum dwellers to appoint a developer within 1 year. If not, SRA will call for
completion competitive bids from private developers and appoint a developer for the TPS.
Step 3: Address Hearing and extension for projects SRA will give a hearing, then provide a reasonable time (not exceeding 1 year) to
LOI Issues with no development after 1 year start the project. If no action, the LOI will be cancelled.
of LOI issuance
Government of If GOI Ministry/Agency favors in-situ development, SRA offers services with 10%
Adopt in-situ or slum relocation
India Lands: In-Situ agency charges. 25% of RR Rate accrues to the land owning department/Ministry
based development approach
Development of GOI
Government of India Relocation if in-situ development Ministry/Agency of GOI pays 75% of prevailing RR rate to SRA for clearing the land.
Lands: Relocation not favored SRA shifts slums to another location or clubs with another scheme within the same
ward.
Identify Central Identify lands and prepare techno- With the help of private surveyors/Architects/Town Planners. Report presented to
Govt. Lands commercial feasibility report the land owning department/entity within 3 months.
CRZ Amendment Remove Salt Pan lands from CRZ Chief Secretary to write to the Secretary, Environment and Forest and Climate
Change, GOI for necessary amendments.
MUMBAI
HOUSING
POLICIES
The origins of Mumbai’s housing problems
Flow Chart on Mumbai's Land and Housing Issues
Planning and Investment in Mumbai's Housing
Emergence of New Policies
Repair Scheme:
Period: 1971–1989.
Funding: Over Rs1500 million spent by Mumbai Housing and Area
Development Board (MHADA).
Outcome: 9861 buildings repaired by 1986.
Criticism: Budget constraints and limited effectiveness.
Privatized Slum Redevelopment
Historical Attempts to Address Slums
Challenges:
High costs and reduced housing stock.
New apartments often too expensive for former slum dwellers.
Many slum dwellers sold new tenements and moved back to slums.
Non-occupiable constructions by public corporations.
Political opposition and moral outrage.
Continued Slum Clearance: Despite decline, slum clearance persisted for commercial purposes (e.g., Babrekar Nagar, Bhagat Singh
Nagar, Kane Nagar).
Supreme Court Ruling: Forbidden slum demolitions during monsoons, yet demolitions occurred in June 1997.
1976 - Present: Slum Improvement and Upgrading
Shift in perspective: Large cities seen as generators of national wealth, not socio-economically malfunctioning.
Urban planning focus: Facilitating city growth through infrastructure and removing obstacles.
New Housing Policies:
Benefits of less western, less capital-intensive approaches recognized in the late 1960s.
Slum upgrading schemes introduced.
Challenges:
Deals with developers for higher density or height permissions largely ignored.
By 1989, only 9% of slum upgrading recipients were from low-income groups, including EWS and LIG.
HOUSING POLICIES IN MUMBAI SINCE THE LATE 19TH CENTURY-
Privatised Slum Redevelopment (1991–present) -
SRD and R Programme: Envisioned rehousing 4 million slum dwellers in new high-rise
apartment blocks. Private developers were to build houses free for slum dwellers
and sell others at a profit.
Lack of Interest from Builders: The article highlights the reluctance of builders to participate in the slum transit scheme due to several factors,
including the absence of government funding, high initial development costs for clearing land and constructing transit tenements, and low
potential profits due to recent declines in real estate prices in the city.
Minimal Progress: In the five years since the scheme's inception, only about 50 out of 250 proposed projects had started. Even if all 250 projects
were completed, they would only accommodate about 50,000 families, which is less than 5% of the target group. As of the article's publication,
only 1,500 families had been provided with free housing.
Long-Term Implications: At the current rate, it would take at least another 100 years to build enough tenements to house all of Mumbai's slum
dwellers(SlumhousinginMumbai).
POLICY INITIATIVES-
Since the 1950s, India's urban housing policies have evolved significantly. The Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation
(MHUPA) oversees these policies. Key initiatives include:
1. Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY) (2013-2022): Provides financial support to states for slum improvement and affordable housing
through public-private partnerships.
2.Rajiv Rinn Yojana: Offers interest subsidies to support affordable housing for low-income urban residents, building on the
previous Interest Subsidy Scheme.
3. Basic Services to Urban Poor (BSUP) (2009): Focuses on improving housing and basic services for the urban poor, with
MHADA as the implementing agency in Maharashtra.
4. Affordable Housing in Partnership: Encourages private sector involvement in creating affordable housing, integrated with
RAY.
These schemes aim to address urban housing shortages by improving infrastructure, increasing affordable housing, and
mobilizing both public and private sector efforts.
Here are Maharashtra's key affordable housing initiatives:
What was the need for change of rules …
Tenants receive 12 months' advance rent and a 10% bank guarantee for construction costs.
If a landlord fails to develop a dilapidated property within 6 months, MHADA can intervene.
Government measures are aimed at boosting development, benefiting tenants and the industry.
Landlords can collaborate for better incentives and sustainable development