0% found this document useful (0 votes)
422 views5 pages

Long Ans BNS

Uploaded by

ANUBHAV GHOSH
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
422 views5 pages

Long Ans BNS

Uploaded by

ANUBHAV GHOSH
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

What are the ingredients of section 3(5) of the BNS which lays down joint responsibility in the doing of a

criminal act?What is the principle governing his section?


♠ Section 3(5) of the BNS (presumably referring to a specific legal statute) typically outlines the
ingredients for establishing joint responsibility in committing a criminal act.
generally, the ingredients include:
1. **Common Intent**: All parties involved must share a common intention to commit the criminal act.
2. **Participation**: Each individual must contribute in some way to the commission of the act, whether
directly or indirectly.
3. **Knowledge**: Each participant should be aware of the criminal nature of the act being committed.
4. **Cooperation**: There should be an element of cooperation among the individuals in carrying out the
act.
For specific applications or variations, it's best to consult the actual statute or legal commentary.
♠ The principle governing Section 3(5) of the BNS typically revolves around **joint liability** in criminal
law. This principle holds that individuals who collaborate in the commission of a crime can be held
equally responsible for the outcome of that crime, regardless of their individual roles. It emphasizes
shared intent and collective action, meaning that all participants can face similar legal consequences for
the criminal act, reinforcing the idea that crime can be a result of cooperative efforts.
What do you understand by ‘Good faith’? How far is ‘good faith’ a good defence in an action under the
BNS?
♠ In the context of the BNS (presumably referring to a specific legal framework), "good faith" generally
signifies an expectation that parties act honestly and fairly in their dealings. It emphasizes the importance
of intention and integrity, ensuring that individuals do not engage in deceitful practices. Good faith can
play a crucial role in interpreting contracts, resolving disputes, and assessing liability, reflecting a
commitment to ethical conduct within the legal framework.
♠ Under the Bharatiya Naya Sanhita (BNS), "good faith" can be a valid defense in certain actions,
particularly when evaluating the intent behind a person's actions.
Mitigation of Liability: If a defendant demonstrates that their actions were taken in good faith—without
deceit or malicious intent—it may mitigate or absolve them of liability for certain offenses.
Judicial Interpretation: Courts assess good faith on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific
circumstances, knowledge, and intentions of the parties involved.
Limitations: Good faith may not be a complete defense in all cases, especially if the actions still violate
the law or if there is negligence involved.
State under what circumstances a person can be said to act ‘dishonestly’ and ‘fraudulently’. In this
connection also distinguish between the terms ‘dishonestly’ and ‘fraudulently’?


Point out the difference between motive and intention. Is it a good defence to criminal proceedings that
the act was done for a good motive? Motive:
Definition: The underlying reason or incentive that drives a person to commit an act.
Nature: It explains why a person engages in a particular behavior, often related to desires, needs, or
emotions.
Intention:
Definition: The purpose or aim behind a specific action; it reflects the commitment to achieve a particular
outcome.
Nature: It is more about the conscious decision to act in a certain way, regardless of the underlying
motive.
Key Differences:
Focus: Motive explains why a person acts, while intention explains what the person aims to do.
Legal Relevance: In legal contexts, intention is often more critical in determining culpability than motive.
♠ In criminal proceedings, acting with a good motive can be a mitigating factor but is generally not a
complete defense. Courts primarily focus on **intention** and the legality of the act itself. Here are some
key points:
1. **Legal Standards**: The law often holds individuals accountable for their actions regardless of motive,
particularly if the act itself is unlawful.
2. **Mitigation**: A good motive may be considered during sentencing or in determining the degree of
culpability, potentially leading to reduced penalties.
3. **Exceptions**: In some cases, specific defenses (like necessity or duress) may allow for consideration
of motive, but these are limited.
In summary, while a good motive might influence the outcome, it typically does not absolve a person of
criminal liability.

What are the different punishments to which the offenders are liable under the BNS?
Under the **Bharatiya Naya Sanhita (BNS)**, offenders can be liable to various types of punishments,
including:
1. **Imprisonment**:
- **Rigorous imprisonment**: Involves hard labor.
- **Simple imprisonment**: No hard labor.
2. **Fine**: Monetary penalties imposed on the offender.
3. **Forfeiture of property**: Loss of property as a consequence of the offense.
4. **Community service**: Alternative punishment involving service to the community (where applicable).
5. **Probation**: Supervision of the offender instead of imprisonment under certain conditions.
6. **Death penalty**: Applicable in the most severe cases, such as murder.
These punishments can vary based on the nature and severity of the offense.
Write short notes on (a) imprisonment for life (b) kinds of imprisonment (c) commutation of sentences
(d) Community service.
♠Imprisonment for Life According to BNS
Imprisonment for life under the Bharatiya Naya Sanhita (BNS) refers to a punishment where the offender
is sentenced to remain in prison for the entirety of their natural life. This form of punishment is typically
applied in cases involving serious offenses, such as murder.
Key Features:
Duration: Life imprisonment does not have a fixed term and lasts until the convict's death, although
provisions for parole may exist based on legal criteria.
Legal Framework: According to Section 4 of the BNS, life imprisonment is one of the possible
punishments, reflecting the severity of certain crimes.
Parole and Commutation: Depending on state laws, inmates serving life sentences may be eligible for
parole or commutation after serving a specified minimum period, subject to good behavior and other
considerations.
Distinction from Death Penalty: Life imprisonment is distinct from capital punishment, as it allows for the
possibility of release under certain conditions, unlike the death penalty.
Purpose: The objective of life imprisonment is both punitive and rehabilitative, aiming to protect society
while providing a chance for reform.
Imprisonment for life serves as a significant penalty, emphasizing the gravity of the offenses that warrant
such a sentence.
♠ (b) Kinds of Imprisonment
In the **Bharatiya Naya Sanhita (BNS)**, imprisonment is categorized into two main types:
1. **Rigorous Imprisonment**:
- **Definition**: This type of imprisonment involves hard labor and is often imposed for serious
offenses.
- **Conditions**: Inmates are required to perform physical work, which can include manual labor,
construction, or other demanding tasks.
- **Purpose**: The aim is not only to punish but also to instill discipline and contribute to rehabilitation
through work.
- **Duration**: The length of rigorous imprisonment can vary based on the nature of the offense, but it
typically carries harsher conditions compared to simple imprisonment.
2. **Simple Imprisonment**:
- **Definition**: Simple imprisonment does not involve hard labor and is used for less severe offenses.
- **Conditions**: Inmates are confined but are not subjected to labor-intensive tasks. The environment
is generally less harsh than that of rigorous imprisonment.
- **Purpose**: This form of imprisonment serves as a punitive measure while focusing more on
confinement rather than labor.
- **Duration**: Like rigorous imprisonment, the duration can vary, but it usually involves shorter terms
compared to serious offenses.
Summary :The distinction between rigorous and simple imprisonment allows the legal system to tailor
punishment based on the severity of the crime, with the former emphasizing labor as part of the
punishment, while the latter focuses on confinement.
♠ Commutation of sentences: refers to the reduction of a punishment from a more severe to a less
severe form. This legal provision aims to provide relief to offenders based on specific circumstances.
Authority: The power to commute sentences generally rests with the executive, such as the President or
the Governor, under Articles 72 and 161 of the Indian Constitution. They can grant pardons, reprieves,
respites, or remissions of punishment.
Grounds for Commutation:
Good Conduct: Inmates who demonstrate exemplary behavior during incarceration may be eligible for
sentence reduction.
Changing Circumstances: New evidence or a shift in societal views regarding certain offenses can
prompt commutation.
Humanitarian Reasons: Considerations such as the health or age of the offender may influence the
decision.
Process: The procedure typically involves a formal application for commutation, which is reviewed by the
appropriate authorities, including prison officials and legal advisors.
Impact: Commutation does not imply that the offender is absolved of their crime; rather, it reflects a
judicial acknowledgment of rehabilitation potential and changing contexts.
What do you understand by ‘solitary confinement’? what are its provision in the BNS
Discuss the law of exemption from criminal liability in the case of minors.
Explain and illustrate the position that the mistake of fact is a good defence while mistake of law is no
defence in the BNS
Define consent. State how far consent can be pleaded as a justification for committing crime. Illustrate
your answer
Briefly summarize the provisions of the BNS relating to the right of private defence of person and
property.
In what circumstance and to what extent can you use force for the defence of you property?

What is a person said to abet the doing of a thing? Who is an abettor?


Can a person who is charged with abetting an offence be convicted when the principal offender is
absconding or acquitted?
Explain the offence of criminal conspiracy. How is it punishable? Distinguish between abetment and
conspiracy
What are the ingredients of the offence of rape? What is the maximum punishmentprovided for this
offence?
What do you understand by “custodial rape”?
What are the ingredients of Gang Rape?
What do you mean by “consent” as per section 63BNS?
How are the expressions “hurt” and “grievous hurt” defined in the BNS
What penal provisions are in BNS for voluntarily throwing or attempting to throw acid?
Describe the various penal provisions in BNS for outraging of modesty of woman.
What is Voyeurism? Describe its scope of application.
What isStalking? Describe its ingredients.

What are the ingredients of the offence of kidnapping?


“The offence of kidnapping a minor girl from lawful guardianship is not a continuing offence” – explain
Define abduction. How does it differ from kidnapping? Is the consent of the party abducted material?
An accused kidnaps and mains with a view to employing him for the purposes of begging. What offence
has he committed?
What do you mean by “Trafficking of person”? Explain punishment for Trafficking of person.
What do you understand by culpable homicide and what elements are necessary to constitute this
offence?
Discuss when does culpable homicide not amount to murder?
Distinguish between culpable homicide and murder.
Discuss the broad guidelines as to when an offence is murder and when it is culpable homicide not
amount to murder.
what is the punishment provided for murder and culpable homicide amounting to murder
What are the ingredients of Sec 109BNS?
What is necessary to constitute the offence of waging or attempting to wage war against the Govt. of
India? How is at punishable?
Explain the law of “sedition”.
Define an ‘unlawful assembly’ when does it amount to riot?
What do you mean by “riot”? How it is punishable?
Briefly explain the liability of constructive criminality as provided in Sec 190 of the BNS
and compare it with the provisions of Sec, 3(5) of the BNS
Distinguish between common intention and common object as embodied in Sec 3(5) and Sec 190 of
BNS
What is an affray? Distinguish between (a) Rioting and affray (b) affray and assault.

You might also like