Lecture 2
Dr. Aysun Hızıroğlu Aygün
HEALTH ECONOMICS
1
Health Economics
How does health produce utility? (Next: What effects
health (lifestyle and medical care choices)?
Services delivered in health care markets are not
“goods,” they do not provide direct utility
They may even have “bad” side effects
Health as an economic good: stock (or capital) of
health generates happiness
Derived demand for medical care
Grossman, M., 1972, On the Concept of Health Capital
and the Demand for Health, Journal of Political
Economy 80 (2): 223–255
2
Demand for Health
Health is like a durable good
Life starts with an inherent stock of health
Different for each individual
Utility=U(X,H)
H is health, X is other goods
Health leads to utility
Utility from X or H increases in a decreasing manner
Utility from other goods increases with health
Utility from health increases with other goods
Indifference curves may be drawn identifying different
combinations of health and other goods with same utility
3
Production of Health
Individual himself produces health using medical care
(health produces utility)
The demand for the final product (health) leads to
derived demand for medical care to produce health
Production function:
H = g(m)
Where m is medical care –broadly defined
Generally: g’(m) > 0 and g’’(m) < 0
Benefits of medical care decrease with usage
May even become negative
4
Health Production
H = g(m,D)
Where D is disease
Impact of medical care depends on disease: disease and
medical care interact to determine health production
Disease I: Health at mid-level, medical care provides
some help (e.g. allergies, asthma)
Disease II: Worst health but medical care restores
health to a better level than DI (e.g. a broken leg)
Disease III: A small health shock but medical care can’t
do much either (e.g. common cold)
5
Health
Disease 1
Disease II
Disease III
Medical
6
Characteristics of Medical Care
Marginal productivity of medical care falls, while average
productivity can be high
Medical care is not a homogeneous activity
Thousands of medical procedures, diseases, and injuries
Current Procedural Terminology System
International Classification of Diseases
Medical care generally does not change ultimate outcome,
but speeds the “cure”
Or slows death: AIDS, some forms of cancer, or Alzheimer’s
disease
Outcomes of medical care is uncertain
Life style also matters
7
Health through the life cycle
Aging: wearing of the health stock
Life expectancy increased
Public Health improvements
Medical care improvements
Typical plot of health stock (Figure 2.4):
Decreasing trend with occasional troughs and recoveries, until Hmin
Aggregate annual death rate per 100,000 persons (35 between
ages 1-4 and 15 thousand over 85)
Technical change reduced these rates for most ages (for ages 15-24,
it’s mostly not technical change but reduction in drunk driving and
improvement in vehicle safety)
Heart attack (20.1%) and cancer (17.5%) comprise more than 35%
of deaths in the US (2021 data).COVID is the 3 rd leading
cause(12%)
8
Health
Hmin
Birth Time
9
Lifestyle and Health
“You are what you eat”
“As you sow, so shall ye reap”
Smoking, alcohol consumption, use of drugs, diet
composition (high cholesterol foods), nature of sexual
activities, amount of exercise
H=g(XBAD, XGOOD, m)
g’(XBAD)<0, g’(XGOOD)>0, g’(m)>0
U’(XBAD) > 0
These choices dominate a person’s health far more
than the medical care system
10
Lifestyle and Health
Source: Charles Phelps, Health Economics Edition 6
11
Lifestyle and Health
Between ages 15-24 (causes that comprise more than
75% ):
Vehicle crashes
Other accidents
Homicide
Suicide
Black males aged 15-24: death rate from homicide
alone exceeds all causes of white males
So medical care system is ineffective in such issues
12
Lifestyle and Health
Source: Charles Phelps, Health Economics
Edition 6
13
Lifestyle and Health
Source: Charles Phelps, Health Economics
Edition 6
14
Lifestyle and Health
Source: Charles Phelps, Health Economics
Edition 6
15
McGinnis and Foege, 1993 listed the main cause of
deaths in the US.
16
Lifestyle and Health
Ages 65 and over, major causes of death
Heart disease (smoking )
Cancer
Stroke
Lung disease (tobacco)
In mid-ages, it’s a mix
Epidemiological data shows systematically increased risk
with lifestyle choices
Smoking one or more packs causes 2.5 times the risk of a fatal
heart attack, similar data for high blood pressure (salt,
alcohol, stress), cholesterol (diet), no exercise
Tobacco, diet/activity patterns and alcohol account for 3/8
of all deaths in the US (1990)
17
Lifestyle Choices (Consumption of
Bads)
Obesity
Tobacco
Alcohol
Education
18
Obesity
Linked to transportation
Coggon et al. (2001) estimate that ¼ of all knee
surgeries could be eliminated but for BMI under 25
19
Obesity
Overweight and obesity trends in the United States, 1960–
2008 Source: Ogden and Carroll (2010)
20
More on lifestyle
Causes of obesity (economics predicts these)
Technology -> Increase in marginal productivity of workers,
calories spent decline (2/3 of increase in BMI since 1960s,
(Lakdawalla and Philipson, 2002) )
Increased value of time increases the opportunity cost of exercise,
encourages shift to fast food (with more women in workforce, time
becomes more valuable, less home-cooking)
Budget for restaurant meals was 1/3 of food budget in 1970s, recently
became ½
Larger portions were introduced starting from 1970s, obesity
increases closely track these
Technology -> Increase in agricultural productivity and mass
production and marketing of food (1/3)
Density of restaurants per capita explain obesity the most
(Chou et al. 2002)
Number of fast-food restaurants per capita doubled between 1970
and 1990, full service restaurants increased by 35%
21
Taking into account the effects on people’s physical activity
(and hence health outcomes), do you think that the
American population is better off or worse off with higher
gasoline prices?
A $1 increase in gasoline prices would (by his work) reduce
obesity-related fatalities by 16,000 per year and save $17
billion annually in health care costs (Courtemanche (2011) )
Courtemache shows higher gasoline prices cause weight loss
$1/gallon increase reduces 16,000 fatalities per year and saves $17 bn
in health care costs (400 mn/d gallons are consumed -- $145 bn spent
annually)
22
Tobacco –why smoke?
Stigler and Becker (1977)
de gustibus non est disputandum
Rational individuals choose to be addicted now and quit
later in life
Lack of information
Decreases with education
From ~30% to ~8% (college)
<3% for physicians
Even health workers’ consumption decreases with education
23
Alcohol
Patterns and intensity matter for constant
consumption
Heavy drinking:
Liver cirrhosis
Some cancers
Heart disease
Type of alcohol matters
Study on Danish adults (Gronbaek et al., 2000):
24
Types of alcohol
Heavy drinking (more than 21 drink per week) of beer and
distilled spirits increases mortality from all causes and
specifically
Cancers (double the risk)
Mixed results re: Coronary Heart Disease
Wine reduces all-cause deaths by about 20%, even for
heavy drinkers, heart disease by 50%
Red wine is not as bad as white wine due to procyanadin in
red wine (also in chocolate, cranberry juice, pomegranates)
General alcohol use increases with education
People with higher education tend to consume healthier
alcohol (Klatsky et al. 1990)
25
FIGURE 2.8 Alcohol use in past month,
adults 18+ years of age, by educational
attainment
26
Alcohol and lifetime income
Moderate consumption may increase lifetime income,
heavy consumption decreases
Through labor force participation, not wage (Mullahy
and Sindelar, 1993)
Income increases access to a healthier life as well as to
restaurants!
Moreover, better health means higher productivity and
income
27
Education
FIGURE 2.9 Prevalence of overweight (BMI > 25) and obesity (BMI > 30) among U.S. adults
28
Education
Could it be that both education and healthier lifestyle
choices could depend on something more
fundamental:
Time preference differences (discounting) (Fuchs
hypothesis)
29
Resources:
Income,
health
insurance,
and other
economic
indicators
Cognitive
ability
Tastes:
discounting,
risk aversion,
or the value
of future
Personality:
self-esteem,
sense of
control,
stress,
depression, or
anxiety
D.M. Cutler, A. Lleras-Muney, 2010 Social
Integration 30
Health Disparities in the US
Life expectancy at 40 y.o.
Life expectancy increases continuously with income.
The gap in life expectancy between individuals in the top and bottom 1% of the income
distribution in the United States is 15 years for men and 10 years for women.
Inequality in life expectancy increased over time (2001-2014)
Life expectancy increased by 2.34 years for men and 2.91 years for women in the top 5%
of the income distribution but by only 0.32 years for men and 0.04 years for women in
the bottom 5%
Life expectancy for low-income individuals varied substantially across local areas
Geographic differences in life expectancy for individuals were significantly
correlated with health behaviors (smoking) but not with access to medical care,
physical environmental factors, income inequality, or labor market conditions.
Source: Chetty et al. JAMA 2016
31