SEMINAR ON

PROBLEM SOLVING &

SCIENTIFIC METHOD

SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY:

Mrs.Giggy John Soniya Baby

Professor 1st Year MSc Nursing

Govt.College of Nursing Govt.College of Nursing

Thrissur Thrissur

PROBLEMSOLVING &SCIENTIFIC METHOD

1
INTRODUCTION
In nursing, effective problem-solving and the scientific method are essential for delivering
evidence-based care and addressing complex clinical challenges. Problem-solving ensures
practical, patient-centered solutions, while the scientific method fosters research-driven
innovation. Together, they enhance critical thinking, bridging theory and practice to improve
outcomes and advance professional competence in healthcare.

Problem Solving
Problem solving is a systematic approach to seek solution to a problem. In this approach,
possible solutions are carefully evaluated and one of them is chosen for implementation.

Core Elements of problem solving

 Identification and definition of the elements composing the problem and
interrelationships among elements
 Specification of crux of the problem along with theorizing about relevance of
background facts and theories
 Determination and systematic collection of facts germane to the proposed crux of the
problems
 Analysis and interpretation and synthesis of the collected facts along with previously
known facts and theories judged to be relevant to the problems
 Proposal of strategic courses of action calculated to solve or alleviate the problems
 Selection of a course of action
 Action
 Observation and evaluation of outcomes of action, followed as warranted by
modifications of course of actions

The importance of structured problem-solving includes:

1. Improved Decision-Making: A structured approach allows nurses to analyze issues

comprehensively, considering all relevant factors before implementing solutions.
2. Evidence-Based Practice: By grounding problem-solving in evidence, it ensures that
nursing interventions are effective, safe, and patient-centered.
3. Enhanced Critical Thinking: Structured processes encourage logical reasoning and
creativity, which are essential for addressing complex healthcare scenarios.
4. Consistency and Reliability: Following a systematic method ensures uniformity in
addressing similar issues, promoting reliability in clinical practice.
5. Better Communication and Collaboration: Structured problem-solving provides a
clear framework that can be shared and discussed with team members, fostering
teamwork and transparency.

Steps in Problem Solving

2
Identification of the problem:

Collect the information from different sources to get a clear interpretation of the problem.

Analyzing the problem:

Analyzing means to gather information as to how the problem effects the situation, who are
involved in the situation, and find out the factors that are contributing to the problem. This
analysis helps in understanding the root causes of the problem.

Generating possible solutions:

It is a very innovative step which involves identifying all possible solutions to the problem.

Analyzing the solution:

Each solution is evaluated for its strength and weakness, potential risks and benefits, and
short- and long-term consequences.

Selecting the best solution:

Select the best solution that is most appropriate to fix the problem given the circumstances,
resources, and other considerations.

Implementing the solution:

Putting into the action of actual solution.

Evaluation of outcome of action:

Establish criteria for evaluating effectiveness of solution and review the results.

SCIENTIFIC METHOD

Scientific method refers to a set of techniques for investigating phenomena, generating new
knowledge, validating previous knowledge, and integrating new knowledge with old
knowledge. In this method, the researcher progresses systematically beginning with the
definition of the problem and moves through the design of the study and collection of
information to the solution of the problem. This method is used to understand, explain,
predict, or control phenomena.

Characteristics of Scientific Method

Orderly and systematic process:

It progresses logically and orderly in a planned series of steps to limit errors or bias.

Commitment to objectivity:

3
Facts are examined without any bias and judgment is based on facts.

Based on empirical evidence:

Data are collected using reliable and valid measure- ments, analyzed scientifically, and
conclusions made based on evidence.

Ethical neutrality:

Science does not declare whether results are good or bad.

Generalizability:

Results can be generalized to other settings.

Controls external factors:

Factors which are not under the study are controlled.

Replication:

Experiments are repeated to ensure accuracy and conclusions are tested through replication.

Verifiability

The conclusion arrived as by a scientist should be verifiable. They must make known to
others how they arrived at these conclusions. They should expose their own methods and
conclusions to critical scrutiny when others test their conclusions under the same conditions,
then it is accepted as correct.

Logical Reasoning Process

The scientific method involves the logical process of reasoning The reasoning process is used
for drawing inferences from the finding of a study or arriving at conclusions The logical
reasoning process consists of induction and deduction

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is the logical thought process of reasoning from particular facts (specific
observations) to a general conclusions it is a way of thinking that is loosely described as
moving from the specific to the general Inductive reasoning begins with specific observations
and moves to generalizations

The inductive method consists of studying several individual cases and drawing a
generalization. Therefore, induction involves with processes-observation and generalization.
Conclusions from induction are tentative inferences and they are subject to further
confirmation based on more evidence. This method is followed when new facts are studied,

4
new truths are uncovered and new generalization formulated from a research project. For
satisfactory induction four essential conditions are requited as given below:

1. Observations must be correctly performed and recorded data collected should be accurate

2. Observations must cover representative cases drawn from a specific universe

3. Observations must cover an adequate number of cases

4. Conclusions must be confined to inference drawn from the findings

There are two basic types of induction viz, enumerative and analytic Enumerative induction
involves generalized from samples and generalization are usually derived through the
analysis of data. Where an analytic induction involves case-by-case analysis of specific
features

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning is the logical thought process of reasoning from generalizations (general
conclusions) to specific conclusions it is a way of thinking that is loosely described as
moving from the general to the specific Deductive reasoning begins with generalizations and
moves to specific observations

Deduction is reasoning process of applying a general accepted principle to a specific

individual case falling under the general principle. It is regarded as reasoning from the
general to the particular. This reasoning establishes a logical relationship between a major
premise, a minor premise and a conclusion (ex. All men are mortal. A is a man, A is mortal).

This deductive method of moving from the general assumption to the specific application is
useful for solving problems. But it is not useful in arriving at new truths. The conditions
necessary for valid deduction are

 The general rule or assumptions must be correct.

 The general rule must be applied only to the cases, which properly fall under it.

In developing systematized knowledge, investigation use both induction and deductive

reasoning. In nursing, for example, using inductive reasoning in nursing process-client
assessment consists of gathering specific facts and observation, putting them together, then
reasoning from these observations and facts to a general conclusion, the nursing diagnosis
Conversely using deductive reasoning when given a client nursing diagnosis and reasoning
from general conclusion that has been made shout the client (the nursing diagnosis) to the
specific facts that making the nursing diagnosis

Research approach involves the mental process of logical reasoning concerning the existence
and properties of phenomena about which more information and new knowledge are sought
through a systematically planned investigation. As already stated that there are two major
modes of logical reasoning, i.e. inductive and deductive

5
Inductive reasoning involves the observation of a particular set of instances that belong to and
can be identified as a part of larger set. Thus reason moves from the particular to the general
and underlies qualitative approaches to enquiry, e.g. .application of particular nursing
conclusions are developed from specific observation. The inductive approach beings with an
observation or some other way of obtaining information and leads to conclusion.

Deductive reasoning moves from the general to the particular, it more variables to related
statements that, when combined, from the basis for concluding assertion of a relationship
between the variables, and is applied through quantitative enquiry approaches For example, a
specific hypothesis can be deduced from a theory or on organizing statement about abstract
concepts that serves as a more general statement or network of interrelated concepts. As a
result of deduction, observation can be made and prediction tested

Scientific approach it is a system of logical and orderly elements, that directs a formal
structured enquiry process in the effort to obtain knowledge. Research is accepted as
scientific approach to knowledge generation when the processes that are use adhere to
principles of logic, standards for data collection and analysis, absence of investigator's bias,
and rules governing generalizability or universality of findings.

Steps in Scientific Method

Scientific method is a systematic process of exploring observations and answering questions,
Scientific method and problem-solving process are similar in many ways. Both - processes
begin with identification of a problem area, developing a plan, collecting data, and evaluating
the data

Though both problem-solving process and scientific method are similar in many ways,
problem-solving approach is different from the scientific method. Problem solving targets a
single problem related to a patient or an organization whereas a scientific method solves the
problems in an organization in a systematic way

Identification and Statement of the Problem

This is the first step in which the scientific enquiry begins with the identification of a
problem. It should be stated carefully because a badly and vague stated problem can
misdirect research and one may lead to wrong conclusion. It is vital to have a precise and
clear understanding of the problem before one starts investigating.

Collecting Information

Second step is to collect relevant facts through observation, experiment or testimony. The
data, which is collected, is considered reliable only if the observer and the conditions under
which the observations are made to fulfill certain requirements. These requirements are:

Observer must have required back-ground knowledge to make reliable observations.

The physical environment under which the observations are collected must be
favorable.

6
 The observer should not allow his personal emotions to interfere in his observations.
He should have objective outline.
Classification and Organization of the Information

In this step, the collected facts are classified or arranged. By classifying the facts, one is able
to (i) identify the properties and behavior of objects, (ii) ascertain if some relationship exists
among the facts and type of relationship that exists and (iii) generalize on the basis of
observed facts.

Formulation of Hypothesis

Based on the observed and classified facts of the given problem, set of hypothesis are
formulated. According to Kerlinger N, hypothesis is defined as a statement that gives the
relationship between various facts of problem. Hypothesis is a tentative solution or
explanation of the problem. A hypothesis may (i) assess that particular object, system or
event has certain characteristics. (ii) Suggest possible cause effect relation of the
phenomenon (iii) Show possible correlation between two or more things.

Deducing the Consequences

This is one of the steps in scientific method in which we deduce the consequences of the
suggested hypothesis by selecting suitable alternatives and most predicted outcome, so we
can reach from general to specific and we may get most suitable alternative for the present
problem and moreover judge the various consequences for best outcome.

Verification of Hypothesis

Here, the deduced consequences of the hypothesis are tested by collecting relevant evidence
through observation, testing and experimentation. The deductive elaboration of a hypothesis
must follow its formulation. One can discover the full meaning of a hypothesis that whether it
is relevant and offers a satisfactory solution to the problem. When a sufficient number of
consequences are verified and found to be correct, it becomes a law.

Drawing Conclusions

In this last step of scientific method, the conclusions are drawn from the proved hypothesis in
the form of generalizations consisting of facts, concepts and principles that would fit into the
theory of knowledge in a discipline.

Communicating findings

Researcher prepares research reports in order to communicate findings to the appropriate

audience

Limitations of the Scientific Method

The scientific approach to enquiry generally is regarded as the highest form of attaining
knowledge that human beings have devised. There are some limitations of applying the

7
Scientific approach to nursing problems which should be mentioned, lest the impression be
given that scientific research is infallible are as follows

Moral or Ethical Problems

Issues that relate to values or ethics are not amenable to the scientific approach, because the
problems they raise cannot be tested. For example, the issue of euthanasia (should euthanasia
be practiced).

Human Complexity

One of the major obstacles in the conducting scientific nursing studies is the complexity of
the central topic of investigation-human beings. Biological and physical functioning is
considerable more regular and consistent and less susceptible-to external influences than
psychological functioning. Each human being is unique with respect to his or her personality,
social environment, mental capacities, values and life styles. This fact makes it relatively
more difficult to detect regularities

Measurement Problems

The tools for collecting empirical information concerning biological or physiological

functions are much more precise and accurate than are the tools are probing psychological
dimension of human activity.

Control Problems

The scientist must attempt to control the research situation in order to the confidence in the
outcomes. Since the scientist accepts the principle of multiple causations, he must attempt to
control factors that are not under direct investigation. Control in a laboratory (for example,
experiment on rats) is much more easily achieved than in the real world. This degree of
control is not possible with human beings

CONCLUSION

The integration of problem-solving and the scientific method in research offers a robust framework
for addressing complex questions systematically. Problem-solving focuses on practical approaches to
real-world issues, while the scientific method ensures rigorous, evidence-based exploration. Together,
they facilitate the generation of reliable knowledge, support innovation, and contribute to advancing
both practice and research across disciplines. This synergy is crucial for achieving meaningful
outcomes and fostering continuous improvement.

8
REFERENCE

1. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing
practice. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021. p. 76–78.
2. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of nursing research. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters
Kluwer; 2010. p. 146, 16–17.
3. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing
practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2012. p. 81–102.
4. Sreevani R. Basics in nursing research and biostatistics. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers
Medical Publishers; 2016. p. 6–8.
5. Pareek B, Sharma S. A textbook of nursing research and statistics. New Delhi: S.
Vikas & Company (Medical Publishers); 2011. p. 17–20.
6. Basavanthappa BT. Nursing research. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical
Publishers; p. 6–14.