0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views100 pages

# Research Methods in AcFn Chapter 1

Uploaded by

jiranusmotuma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Topics covered

  • Research Recommendations,
  • Research Reliability,
  • Data Collection,
  • Research Ethics,
  • Research Framework,
  • Research Perseverance,
  • Qualitative Research,
  • Research Stakeholders,
  • Research Characteristics,
  • Statistical Analysis
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views100 pages

# Research Methods in AcFn Chapter 1

Uploaded by

jiranusmotuma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Topics covered

  • Research Recommendations,
  • Research Reliability,
  • Data Collection,
  • Research Ethics,
  • Research Framework,
  • Research Perseverance,
  • Qualitative Research,
  • Research Stakeholders,
  • Research Characteristics,
  • Statistical Analysis

RESEARCH METHODS

IN ACCOUNTING & FINANCE


ACFN 3111

I SEMESTER 2023/24 AY

DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE


COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS
ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY

1
Syllabus

1. Concepts of Scientific Research /Introduction/


1.1 Concept of research
1.2 Types of Research
 Meaning of research  Basic research
 Motivation for research  Applied research
 Importance of research  Quantitative research
 Purpose of studying research methods  Qualitative research
 Exploratory research
 Managerial value of research
 Descriptive research
 Characteristics of good research
 Causal research

2
Syllabus
1. Concepts of Scientific Research (Cont’d)
1.3 The Systematic Process of Research (Main Stages)
 Determining a research problem
 Formulating a Research question/ Hypothesis
 Designing the study
 Developing data collection instrument
 Data collection
 Data analysis and presentation
 Determining research implications & findings
 Making recommendations

3
Syllabus

2. Research Problem: The Heart of the Research Process


2.1 What is a Research Problem 2.3 Testing Hypothesis
 Defining the research problem  State the hypothesis
 Sources of research problems  Determine the appropriate test
 Guidelines for problem statement statistics
 Specify the significance level
2.2 Hypothesis Formulation
 Determine the decision rule
 Defining hypothesis
 Collect data & perform the needed
 Hypothesis vs. Research problem
conclusion
 Possible sources of hypothesis
 Decide to reject or not reject and
 Null and Alternative hypothesis
produce conclusion
 Basic characteristics of good hypothesis

4
Syllabus

3. Research Proposal
3.1 The purpose research proposal
3.2 Structure of a research proposal
 Background of the study
 Statement of the problem
 Research objectives
 Research question/ hypothesis
 Significance of the research
 Literature review (Preliminary)
 Research methodology/design
 Work plan (Timetable/Timescale) and budget (resources)
 Other sections of the proposal (cover page, abstract, references/citation…)
3.3 Proposal writing (hand in assignment )
5
Syllabus

4. Sampling Design

4.1 Sampling design


4.2 Census and sample survey
4.3 The need for sampling
4.4 Steps in sampling design
4.5 Criteria for selecting a sampling procedures
4.6 Types of sample design
4.7 Probability sampling design
4.8 Non probability sampling design

6
Syllabus
5. Sources and Collection of Data
5.1 Types and sources of data
5.2 Methods of primary data collection
5.3 Methods of secondary data collection

6. Data Presentation and Analysis Methods


6.1 Descriptive versus inferential data analysis
6.2 Spread sheet application in data analysis
6.3 Article review

7
Chapter I

Concepts of Scientific Research


Contents

1. Meaning of Research
2. Characteristics of Research (what’s and what’s not)
3. Objectives of Research
4. Importance/Significance of Research
5. Motivation in Research
6. Managerial value of Research
7. Characteristics/Criteria of Good Research
8. Types of Research
9. The systematic process of research

9
Introduction – The Meaning of Research

 While research is important in both business and academia, there is no consensus in the
literature on how it should be defined. The definitions are legion.

 However, from the many definitions there appears to be conformity that research:
 is a process of enquiry and investigation;
 is systematic and methodical; and
 increases knowledge.
Introduction – The Meaning of Research…

 The ‘process of enquiry and investigation’ suggests that research is all about having a
predetermined set of questions, and then aim to answer these questions through the
gathering of information and analysis.

 “Systematic and methodical” implies that your research must be well organized and go
through a series of stages.

 i.e. research is done in an organized manner.


 A research project has a well-known structure: a beginning, a middle, and an end
(i.e. research cycle).

11
Introduction – The Meaning of Research…

 “Research increases knowledge” means that:


 Not only your own knowledge about the subject improves as a result of your research,
but so too will that of your audience.
 Research = knowledge advancement/generation or search for knowledge/ a course of
critical or scientific inquiry.

 Hence, research can be defined as:


 a systematic (step-by-step) process of collecting, recording, analyzing, and interpreting
information—data— in order to increase our understanding of a phenomenon/subject
about which we are interested or concerned.

12
Introduction – The Meaning of Research…

 The term “Research” consists of two words:


 Research = Re + Search
 “Re” means again and again
 “Search” means to find out something. The process is:

 Thus, research means to observe the phenomena again and again from different
dimensions. It is the art of scientific investigation.
 Research is a process of intellectual discovery, which has the potential to
transform our knowledge and understanding of the world around us.
13
Introduction – The Meaning of Research…

 Business research
 is the application of the scientific method in searching for the truth about business
phenomena (activities include defining business opportunities and problems,
generating and evaluating ideas, monitoring performance, and understanding the
business process).
 is systematic and organized effort to investigate a specific problem encountered in the
work setting that needs a solution.
 the systematic inquiry that provides information to guide business/ managerial
decisions.

14
Introduction – The Meaning of Research…

 Business research (cont’d)


 an organized, systematic, data‐based, critical, objective, inquiry or investigation into a
specific problem, undertaken with the purpose of finding answers or solutions to it.
 it is a process of planning, acquiring, analyzing, and disseminating relevant data,
information, and insights to decision makers in ways that mobilize the organization to
take appropriate actions that, in turn, maximize performance.
 Accounting research
 is a systematic process of investigating an issue of concern to the accountant.

15
Introduction – The Meaning of Research…

 Accounting research – is a systematic process of investigating an issue of


concern to the accountant.
 E.g. IASB due process

Compiled by Andualem (2023/24) 16


Introduction – The Meaning of Research…

 Business research
 is a systematic inquiry that provides information to guide a specified managerial
decision.
 More specifically, it is a set of processes that include planning, acquiring,
analyzing, and reporting relevant data, information, and insights to decision
makers in ways that mobilize the organization to take appropriate actions.
 These actions are designed to maximize performance and help accomplish
organizational goals.
 Typically, the overall process is divided into the following stages:
1. Clarify the research question.
2. Design the research.
3. Collect and prepare the data.
4. Analyze and interpret the data.
5. Report insights and recommendations.
17
Introduction – The Meaning of Research…

 What research is… (often called primary/original research) – The steps in formal research –
the researcher:
1. begins with a problem—an unanswered question;
2. clearly and specifically articulates the goal of the research endeavor;
3. often divides the principal problem into more manageable subproblems;
4. identifies hypotheses and assumptions that underlie the research effort (assumptions
are equivalent to axioms in geometry self evident truths, the sine qua non (prerequisite)
of research);
5. develops a specific plan/design for addressing the problem and its subproblems – in the
formative stages of a research project, much can be decided: e.g. data – existence, access,
analysis, etc;
6. collects, organizes, and analyzes data related to the problem and its subproblems; and
7. interprets the meaning of the data as they relate to the problem and its subproblems.

18
Introduction – The Meaning of Research…

 What research is…

 The two important points related to the foregoing seven-step process are:

 First, the process is iterative - A researcher sometimes needs to move back and

forth between two or more steps along the way

 Second, the process is cyclical - research typically involves a cycle—or more

accurately, a helix (spiral)—in which one study spawns additional, follow-up

studies. Research begets more research. Research is rarely conclusive.

19
Introduction – The Meaning of Research…

 What research is not … (often called ‘secondary research’?)


 Research is not merely gathering information/information discovery (e.g. get
information about intellectual property from the library)
 Research is not merely rummaging around for hard-to-locate information (e.g. for
trading property) - Rummaging—whether through records in one’s own office, at a
library, or on the Internet—is not research. It is more accurately called an exercise in
self-enlightenment.
 Research is not merely transporting facts from one location to another (e.g. a FA course
assignment to write ad present about AABE? )– fact transcription, fact documentation,
fact organization, or fact summarization.

20
Introduction – The Meaning of Research…

 Example 1 – Topic – Auditing - Audit Pricing

 Main problem: What are the determinants audit fees in Ethiopia?

 Subproblems

 Sub-problem 1. what are the determinants of (factors affecting) audit fees paid by public
sector organizations to their external auditors?

 Sub-problem 2. What are the determinants of (factors affecting) audit fees paid by
private sector organizations to their external auditors?

 Sub-problem 3. Do the determinants of (factors affecting) audit fees in the public and
private sector organizations discern any pattern of variation in audit pricing and why…?

21
Introduction – The Meaning of Research…

 Exercise 1 – Topic – Financial Accounting/Reporting – Financial reporting practices


of construction companies/firms in Ethiopia?

 Main problem:

 Subproblems

1. …

2. …

3. …

22
Introduction – The Meaning of Research…

 Research methods

 the techniques and range of tools you use to do research are called.

 provide the needed information that guide policy makers to make informed

decisions by reducing uncertainty.

 With the right sort of methods you should be able to convince other people that your

conclusions have some validity


Introduction – Objectives of Research

 The role of research has increased in modern times b/c research

 provides the basis for nearly all government policies.

 helps in solving various operational and planning problems of business and industry.

 reduces uncertainty for policy makers, planners, business managers, and other
stakeholders by providing information that improves the decision-making process

 Contributes to Policy/Practice/Literature

24
Introduction – Objectives of Research…

 Research can be used to (what can be done with research?):

 Categorize - involves forming a typology of objects, events or concepts and can be


useful in explaining which ‘things’ belong together and how.

 Describe - attempts to examine situations in order to establish what is the norm- the
what question.

 Explain - aims to move beyond ‘just getting the facts’ in order to make sense of the
myriad other elements involved – the why question.

 Evaluate - involves making judgments about the quality of objects or events.

 Compare - Two or more contrasting cases can be examined to highlight differences and
similarities between them, leading to a better understanding of phenomena.
25
Introduction – Objectives of Research…

 Correlate - relationships between two phenomena are investigated to see whether they
move in the same direction.
 Predictions- if there has been a strong relationship between characteristics or events in
the past, then similar circumstances should exist in the future, leading to predictable
outcomes.
 Control- Once you understand an event or situation, you may be able to find ways to
control it. If the cause and effect relationships are identified you are able to exert control
over the vital ingredients.

26
Introduction – Motivation (Interest/s) in Research

 The motivation to do research may be due to the desire:

 to get a research degree along with its consequential benefits

 to face the challenge in solving the unsolved problems, i.e., concern over
practical problems initiates research

 to get intellectual joy of doing some creative work

 to be of service to society

 to get respectability, etc.

27
Introduction – Factors Affecting Social Research

 Although research is important, it is not a panacea for all the problems that an
organization faces.

 Therefore, an organization should decide upon the option of conducting research


after considering various factors.

 time constraints,

 availability of resources,

 availability of data, and

 nature of information that the organization is expecting and the costs


involved.
28
Introduction – Factors Affecting Social Research…

 When is Business Research Needed?

Compiled by Andualem (2015/2023) 29


Introduction – Sources of knowledge (Generation/Acquisition?)

 What is Knowledge?
 information about or awareness of something, an issue, a fact;
 an understanding of a matter, a fact, an issue.
 Research is about generating knowledge - an awareness of something or an
understanding of a matter.
 Knowledge of our social world comes from a range of different sources:
through reasoning, through intuition, or through the use of appropriate
methods.
 But, not all roads to knowledge are equally useful/reliable.

30
Introduction – Sources of knowledge…

 The methods of obtaining knowledge can be categorized as:


 scientific and
 non-scientific methods.

 Non-Scientific Method

 gaining knowledge through senses, experience, intuition, and revelation.

 Senses and Experiences (Experiential knowing)

 gaining knowledge through physical senses - seeing, sound/hear, touch, taste,


and smell - and experience, e.g. when one gets too close to a fire and gets
burned, he or she gains the knowledge that it is dangerous to be too close to the
fire.
31
Introduction – Sources of knowledge…
 Non-Scientific Method…
 Intuition/Tenacity
 Knowledge is obtained if one strongly believes what one perceives is real and true.
 Believing something because, based on your view of the world and your assumptions, you
don’t want to give up your belief.
 It is subjective, because if two people hold mutually contradictory beliefs, both cannot be true.
 Willingness to accept ideas as valid knowledge despite contrary evidence and/or lack of
supporting evidence.
 Revelation (Authoritative knowledge)
 An alternative to an individual’s belief in what is true, could come from what authorities say is true.
 We may feel convinced that something is true because an authority (the Bible, Koran, a leader or
teacher) tells us it is true.
 But, experts with different perspectives will hold different beliefs. How is one to know which
expert/authority is right?
32
Introduction – Sources of knowledge…

 So, knowledge acquired through nonscientific methods cannot be subjected to objective


testing.
 Scientific Method:
 the most valid and reliable approach of gaining knowledge is through science, which
is objective and self-correcting
 knowledge obtained by scientific method can be subject to testing (verification).
 a standardized set of techniques for building scientific knowledge, such as how to
make valid observations, interpret results, and generalize those results.

33
Introduction – Sources of knowledge…

 The Scientific Method…


 The scientific method consists of a systematic observation, classification and
interpretation of data – appropriate methods are used.
 Scientific knowledge relies on observations which are objective, data-driven,
public, and potentially replicable.
 The process is also incremental, with a series of small steps rather than a giant
leap.
 Science insists on following systematic, methodical “rules“ for gathering
empirical evidence. Because, evidence that is obtained in an unsystematic way
is regarded as problematic; i.e. it is seen as less trust worthy or unreliable.

34
Introduction – Sources of knowledge…

 The Scientific Method…


 The actual practice of science also shows that there are alternative methods
of gathering information and of analyzing the data.
 What constitutes a ‘science’ and the nature of its methods are open to
dispute.
 In general science is interested to discover “ laws“ or regularities of both the
physical and social worlds (e.g. the law of gravity, demand and supply)
 Some sciences, deal with the physical and material world- natural science.

35
Introduction – Sources of knowledge…

 The Scientific Method…


 The subject matter of the natural sciences is the physical world, and is
independent of the researcher and the way it is understood. For example, a tree
has a physical structure of its own, regardless of the scientist who is studying
the way it grows.
 Other sciences involve the study of people – their beliefs, behavior, interactions,
attitudes, institutions, and so forth- social sciences. They are sometimes also
called soft sciences.
 The subject matter in social science (human life) is fluid, formidable to
observe, and hard to measure precisely with laboratory instruments. But, it
does not mean it lacks rigor.
36
Introduction – Sources of knowledge…

 The Scientific Method…


 We arrive at scientific laws or theories through a process of logic and evidence.
 Logic (theory) and evidence (observations) are the two, and only two, pillars
upon which scientific knowledge is based.
 In science, theories and observations are interrelated and cannot exist without
each other.
 Theories provide meaning and significance to what we observe, and
observations help validate or refine existing theory or construct new theory.

37
Introduction – Sources of knowledge…

 The Scientific Method…


 Science
 etymologically, the word “science” is derived from the Latin word scientia meaning
knowledge.
 refers to a systematic and organized body of knowledge in any area of inquiry that is
acquired using “the scientific method”
 Goals of science
 Description – understanding the behaviors and events we study.
 Explanation – identifying the conditions within which behaviors and events
operate.
 Prediction – foretelling the occurrence of behaviors or events in the future.
 Control – means that we can make a behavior or event occur and not occur (i.e.
regularity).

38
Introduction – Sources of knowledge…

 In Sum – How do we know what we know?


 Tenacity – knowing by force of habit (accept ideas as valid knowledge despite contrary
evidence and or lack of supporting evidence – accept mindless repetitions (e.g. in a
campaign or ad) as true.
 Intuition – direct acquisition of knowledge without intellectual effort or sensory
processing (e.g. extrasensory perception)
 Authority – knowledge gained from others
 Reason – relying on logic and rationality
 Empiricism – knowledge based on experience
 Science – relying on systematic empiricism (combines reason/rationalism and
empiricism)
39
Introduction – Steps in the Scientific Method of Research

 The main steps in the scientific method include:


1. Choose a question to investigate
2. Identify a hypothesis related to the question
3. Make testable predictions in the hypothesis
4. Design an experiment to answer hypothesis question
5. Collect data (experiment)
6. Determine results and assess their validity
7. Determine if results support or refute your hypothesis

40
Introduction – Characteristics of the Scientific Method

 A set of overriding principles govern the scientific investigation.


 It is based on empirical evidence
 The scientific method is based on empirical evidence and utilizes relevant concepts
 It is concerned with the realities that are observable through the use of verifiable
experience or observation.
 it is based on logical reasoning (Critical thinking)
 The scientific method practices logical reasoning which allows determination of the
truth through steps different from emotional and hopeful thinking
 Science is fundamentally a rational activity, and the scientific explanation must make
sense.
 Religion may rest on revelations, custom, or traditions, gambling on faith, but
science must rest on logical reasons.
41
Introduction – Characteristics of the Scientific Method…

 A set of overriding principles govern the scientific investigation.


 It possesses skeptical attitude
 any proposition is open to analysis and critique
 This is the constant questioning of your beliefs and conclusions – it requires the
possession of skeptical attitudes.
 A skeptic holds beliefs tentatively, and is open to new evidence and rational
argument
 It is Verifiable: Observations made through SM are to be verified by using the senses to
confirm or refute the previous findings.
 The more the results are replicated or repeated, the more we will gain confidence in
the scientific nature of our research.
42
Introduction – Characteristics of the Scientific Method…

 A set of overriding principles govern the scientific investigation.


 It is Cumulative: Prior to the start of any study researchers try to scan through the
literature.
 Instead of reinventing the wheel researchers take stock of the existing body of
knowledge and try to build on it -knowledge keeps on growing.
 A linkage between the present and the previous body of knowledge has to be
established, and that is how the knowledge accumulates.
 Every new idea does not have to start from a scratch;

43
Introduction – Characteristics of the Scientific Method…

 A set of overriding principles govern the scientific investigation.


 It is Deterministic: Science is based on the assumption that all events have
antecedent causes that are subject to identification and logical understanding.
 For the scientist, nothing “just happens” – it happens for a reason.
 events occur according to regular laws and causes.
 The scientific researchers try to explain the emerging phenomenon by
identifying its causes.
 The researcher tries to narrow down the number of reasons in such a way that
some action could be taken.

44
Introduction – Characteristics of the Scientific Method…

 A set of overriding principles govern the scientific investigation.


 It possess ethical and ideological neutrality: The conclusions drawn through
interpretation of the results of data analysis should be objective;
 i.e., they should be based on the facts of the findings derived from actual data,
and not on our own subjective or emotional values.
 Researchers are human beings, having individual ideologies, religious
affiliations, cultural differences which can influence the research findings.
 Therefore, follow the principle of objectivity, uphold neutrality, and present the
results in an unbiased manner.

45
Introduction – Characteristics of the Scientific Method…

 A set of overriding principles govern the scientific investigation.


 It lends to statistical generalization: The scope of the research findings in one
organizational setting applicable to other settings.
 The more generalizable the research, the greater its usefulness and value.

 Science Is Public: Scientists only recognize research as valid or useful when they
can scrutinize it.
 Generally, we accept research as valid if it has undergone a peer review
process.

46
Introduction – Characteristics of the Scientific Method…

 The hallmarks of scientific research:


1. Purposiveness: started the research with a definite aim or purpose, purposive focus.
2. Rigor: carefulness, scrupulousness, the degree of exactitude in research investigations.
Good theoretical base and a sound methodological design. Every effort is made to
minimize error.
3. Testability: researcher develops certain hypotheses, then these can be tested by
applying certain statistical tests to the data collected for the purpose.
4. Replicability: the results of the tests of hypotheses should be supported again and yet
again when the same type of research is repeated in other similar circumstances (similar
results when repeated).

Compiled by Andualem (2015/2023) 47


Introduction – Characteristics of the Scientific Method…

 The hallmarks of scientific research:


5. Precision and confidence: - Precision: the closeness of the findings to “reality” based
on a sample. Reflects the degree of accuracy or exactitude of the results on the basis of
the sample – to what really exist in the universe - Confidence: the probability that our
estimations are correct
6. Objectivity: the conclusions drawn through the interpretation of the results of data
analysis based on the facts of the findings derived from actual data and not on our own
subjective or emotional values.

Compiled by Andualem (2015/2023) 48


Introduction – Characteristics of the Scientific Method…

 The hallmarks of scientific research:


7. Generalizability: refers to the results of the research and how far they are applicable
to locations and situations beyond the scope of the study. The research sampling design
has to be logically developed and a number of other details in the data-collection
methods need to be meticulously followed.
8. Parsimony: simplicity in explaining the phenomena or problems that occur, and in
generating solutions for the problems. Introduced with a good understanding of the
problem and the important factors that influences it; good conceptual theoretical
model.

Compiled by Andualem (2015/2023) 49


Introduction – Importance of Research

 All progress is born of inquiry. All development and progress in the society is an outcome
of a research work.
 The development of logical thinking is promoted by conducting the research activities.
 Research is the fountain of knowledge and an important source of providing guidelines for
solving different business, governmental and social problems.
 Research provides base for the policies formation of the Government related to agriculture,
industries and infrastructural services in the country.
 Decision-making may not be a part of research, but research certainly facilitates the
decisions of the policy maker.
 Another area in government, where research is necessary, is collecting information on the
economic and social structure of the nation. In this context investigation in the structure of
economy is conducted through compilation of data and analysis of facts. Research provides
for predicting of future prospects of the country.

50
Introduction – Importance of Research…

 Research has special importance in relation to solving various problems of business and
industries. Market research, operation research and motivation research are conducted in the
business for various requirements.
 Research is equally important to social scientists for analyzing the social relationships and
seeking explanations to various social problems.
 The importance of research can also be ascertaining through its application in socio political
sector in order to find out solution to social and political problem of the society.
 To those students, professionals, among others who are to write project, thesis, dissertation,
among others research may mean of careerism or a way to attain a high position in the social
structure.

51
Introduction – Managerial value of research

 The prime managerial value of business research is that it reduces uncertainty by


providing information that improves the decision-making process.
 The decision making process associated with the development and implementation
of a strategy involves three interrelated stages.
 Identifying problems or opportunities
 Diagnosis and assessment problems or opportunities
 Selecting, implementing, evaluating a course of action

52
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research

 Purpose clearly defined


 Research process detailed
 Describe research procedure in sufficient details to permit another researcher to
repeat the research for further advancement
 Research design thoroughly planned
 Efforts should be made to minimize the influence of personal bias in selecting and
recording data.
 High ethical standards applied
 Include safeguards against causing mental or physical harm to participants and
makes data integrity a first priority should be highly valued.
53
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 Limitations frankly revealed


 report with complete frankness, flaws in procedural design and estimate their
effects upon the findings.
 Adequate analysis for decision maker’s needs (i.e. Robustness)
 check the validity and reliability of the data
 use appropriate descriptive and inferential techniques
 apply the criteria of statistical significance
 Findings presented unambiguously
 Conclusions justified
 Researcher’s experience reflected
54
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 Research Ethics – Addressing ethical issues

 Harm to participants

 Lack of informed consent

 Invasion of privacy

 Deception

 Protecting research subjects

55
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 Research Ethics – Addressing ethical issues


 The value of research depends on its ethical veracity.
 Ethics are the rules of conduct in research.
 How can we believe the results of a research project if we doubt the honesty of the
researchers and the integrity of the research methods used?
 Ethics is not just considered from the point of view of the researcher, but also from
the viewpoint of those with a vested interest in the research- individuals,
organizations and governments.

56
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 Research Ethics – Addressing ethical issues


 Researchers, subjects, funding bodies and society may have conflicting
incentives/interests.
 As a result of its focus on people, ethical issues are centrally important in research.
 In other words, ethical responsibility is required to do the work honestly and with
integrity.
 Researchers must ensure the accuracy, appropriateness, of data and research results.
 Two examples that necessitated the use of research ethics:
 The way German scientists had used captive human subjects in gruesome
experiments during WW II.
 In the 1950s and 1960s, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study involved the withholding of
known effective treatment for syphilis from African-American participants who
were infected.
 Hence, nowadays when working with human participants, it is often necessary to
obtain some kind of ethical approval – from ethical boards.
57
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 Research Ethics – Addressing ethical issues


 Researchers, subjects, funding bodies and society may have conflicting
incentives/interests.
 As a result of its focus on people, ethical issues are centrally important in research.
 In other words, ethical responsibility is required to do the work honestly and with
integrity.
 Researchers must ensure the accuracy, appropriateness, of data and research results.
 Two examples that necessitated the use of research ethics:
 The way German scientists had used captive human subjects in gruesome
experiments during WW II.
 In the 1950s and 1960s, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study involved the withholding of
known effective treatment for syphilis from African-American participants who
were infected.
 Hence, nowadays when working with human participants, it is often necessary to
obtain some kind of ethical approval – from ethical boards.
58
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 Research Ethics – Addressing ethical issues


 To treat participants in your research with respect and due consideration is a basic
tenet of civilized behaviour.
 Research stakeholders

59
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 Honesty in your work


 It is easy to cheat, but the penalties resulting from discovery are stiff and humiliating.
 So, honesty is essential to engender a level of trust and credibility for the development
of knowledge.
 Do not fabricate, falsify, or misrepresent data.
 Do not deceive colleagues, research sponsors, or the public.
 Researcher-researcher relation (Intellectual ownership)
 Unless otherwise stated, what you write and the ideas will be regarded as your own
work.
 Directly copying someone else’s work into your report, thesis etc. and letting it be
assumed that it is your own – plagiarism - is the worst offence in academics
 Plagiarism is the unauthorized use of someone else's thoughts or wording either by
 incorrect documentation, failing to cite your sources altogether, or
 simply by relying too heavily on external resources.

60
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 Plagiarism includes copied data/information, falsification, fabrication or omission of


significant results.
 It also includes informal published material such as the "buying" of a paper from another
student.
 Plagiarizing undermines your academic integrity and betrays your own responsibilities.
 Because it is intellectual theft, plagiarism is considered as an academic crime with
punishment
 Can easily be detected through peer reviews

61
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 Some examples of plagiarism include


 The verbatim copying of another person’s work without acknowledging it.
 The close paraphrasing of another person’s work by simply changing a few words or
altering the order of presentation without acknowledging it.
 The unacknowledged quotation of phrases from another person’s work and/or the
presentation of another person’s idea(s) as one’s own.
 Citation and acknowledgement
 In no field of research can one rely entirely on own ideas, concepts and theories alone.
 Standard practices have been developed to permit the originators of the work and ideas
to be acknowledged within your own text
 This is called citation.
 You should acknowledge the assistance of others and any collaboration with others.

62
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 Responsibility and accountability of the researcher


 You do have responsibilities to fellow researchers, respondents, the public and the
academic community.
 Accurate descriptions are required of
 what you have done,
 how you have done it,
 the information you obtained,
 the techniques you used,
 the analysis you carried out, and
 the results of experiments , etc.

63
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 Falsifying results—to make them fit your conclusion.


 Trimming—removing data that does not fit in with your analysis.
 Biased or inappropriate analysis.
 Fabrication and falsification of research results are serious forms of misconduct.
 Researcher should avoid either a false statement or an omission that distorts the truth -
Objectivity.
 In order to preserve accurate documentation, every researcher has an obligation to
maintain a clear and complete record of data acquired.

64
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 It is unethical to conduct research that is badly planned or poorly executed.


 Fraud must be avoided in research and this can come in several forms:
 Being selective in sampling.
 Not reporting survey response/participation rates.
 Deliberately biasing the data collection instruments—for example, asking leading
questions in surveys.
 Making up data—because you can’t be bothered doing the data collection.

65
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 Data and Interpretations


 There is often a temptation to be too selective in the use of data and in presenting the
results of the analysis.
 Irresponsible policy advise
 Waste of research fund, etc.
 Silently rejecting or ignoring evidence which happens to be contrary to one’s beliefs
constitutes a breach of integrity.
 What could be of vital importance in developing a theory could be lost.
 Scientific objectivity should be maintained.

66
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 It is considered a breach of research integrity to fail to report data that contradict or


merely fail to support the conclusions.
 Negative (unexpected) results must also be reported.
 Records should include sufficient detail to permit examination for the purpose of
 replicating the research,
 responding to questions that may result from unintentional error or
misinterpretation,
 establishing authenticity of the records, and
 confirming the validity of the conclusions.

67
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 Funding bodies and researchers


 Pressure and sponsorship from sources which might influence the impartiality of the
research outcomes should be avoided.
 Fund allocations directing research - ‘money buying research results’?
 Researcher and research subjects
 Some ethical principles governing data collection include: harm to respondents,
informed consent, respect for privacy and safeguarding the confidentiality of data.
 In collecting data researchers need to be guided by principles of respect for persons and
obtaining informed consent.
 There are two standards that are applied in order to help protect the privacy of research
participants.
68
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…
 There are two standards that are applied in order to help protect the privacy of research
participants…
 Confidentiality – participants are assured that identifying information will not be made
available to anyone who is not directly involved in the study - If you promise anonymity
to questionnaire respondents, then that means that no one, including you, will know who
has completed the questionnaire.
 Anonymity - means that the participant will remain anonymous throughout the study --
even to the researchers themselves.
 Anonymity means that no one will see (your completed questionnaire/interview
transcript) except the researcher and all questionnaires and records will be deleted once
the research is completed.’ The anonymity standard is a strong guarantee of privacy, but
it is sometimes difficult to accomplish, especially in situations where participants have to
be measured at multiple time points (e.g., a pre-post study).

69
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

1. Harm to participants
 Physical harm, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of trust, harm to participant’s
development, loss of self-esteem, stress, etc.
 Ethical standards require that researchers should not put participants in a situation where
they might be at risk of being harmed as a result of their participation.
 Harm can be defined as both physical and psychological.

 Minimize harms and risks and maximize benefits; respect human dignity, privacy, and
autonomy; take special precautions with vulnerable populations.

70
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…
2. Lack of informed consent
 The principle of voluntary participation requires that people should not be coerced into
participating in research.
 Voluntary participation requires informed consent.
 This means that prospective research participants must be fully informed about the
procedures and risks involved in research and must give their consent to participate.
i.e. getting the informed consent of those you are going to interview, question,
observe or take materials from.
 Informed consent implies that persons who are invited to participate in the research
activities should be free to choose to take part or refuse.
 Participants should be given as much information as needed to make decision on
participation
 They are free to decide after having been given the fullest information concerning the
nature and purpose of the research.

71
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

3. Invasion of privacy
 This is linked to informed consent
 Covert methods are violations of the privacy principle on the grounds that participants
are not being given the opportunity to refuse invasions of their privacy
 Participants may refuse to address specific questions even though they have agreed to
participate
Protecting research subjects
 Legal protection
 Professional associations and universities (ethics committees)

72
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

3. Invasion of privacy
 This is linked to informed consent
 Covert methods are violations of the privacy principle on the grounds that participants
are not being given the opportunity to refuse invasions of their privacy
 Participants may refuse to address specific questions even though they have agreed to
participate
Protecting research subjects
 Legal protection
 Professional associations and universities (ethics committees)

73
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

4. Deception
 Deception occurs when researchers present their research as something other than what it is.
 Researchers usually want to limit participants understanding of what the research is
about so that they act naturally to the experiment.
 Collection of data illegally, under false pretenses (from minors, etc.) is unethical.
 Getting access and consent to do research is essential.
 Debriefing: is talking to participants following their role in the research.
 It is often important to provide participants with any additional information they need to
develop their understanding of the research after the data have been collected.
 In some cases, participants may also be interested in a summary of the research findings.

74
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 So, there needs to be a procedure that assures that researchers will consider relevant ethical
issues in formulating research plans.
 Formulating an Institutional Review Board (IRB)
 A panel of persons will review proposals with respect to ethical implications and decide
whether additional actions need to be taken to assure the safety and rights of participants.
 Ethics committees play an important part in ensuring that no badly designed or harmful
research is permitted.
 Ethics committees have a duty to consider all possible sources of harm.
 They have to make sure that the researcher has thought through all the relevant issues
prior to granting permission to proceed
 By reviewing proposals for research, IRBs help to protect both
 the organization, and the researcher against potential legal implications of neglecting to
address important ethical issues of participants.
75
Introduction – Characteristics/Criteria of good research…

 In summary: Some important shared values for the responsible conduct of business
research include:
 honesty — conveying information truthfully and honoring commitments,
 accuracy — reporting findings precisely and taking care to avoid errors,
 efficiency — using resources wisely and avoiding waste, and
 objectivity — letting the facts speak for themselves and avoiding improper bias.
 social responsibility-strive to promote social good and prevent or mitigate social
harms through research.

76
Introduction – Types /Classification of Research

 Research comes in many shapes and sizes.

 Classifying research is a useful way of analysing studies according to key characteristics


 There are different criteria for classifying research activities.
 Hence, the classification may be in terms of:
 the research (data collection)techniques used in it,
 the time dimension,
 research environment,
 data used, and
 the intended uses of research

77
Introduction – Types /Classification of Research…

 Four main typologies based on

 Purpose of the research

 Process of the research

 Outcome of the research

 Logic of the research

 Time dimension of the research

78
Introduction – Classification of Research – Purpose

 Exploratory/Formulative research – used to gain an initial understanding where there is


little or no existing knowledge (rarely provides conclusive answers but offers guidance for
future research)
 E.g. What motivates a group of employees to increase their productivity?
 Descriptive research – used to describe phenomena as they exist identify and obtain
information on characteristics of the problem/issue (also termed ‘ex post facto research’ )
 E.g. How are the employees rewarded and how are productivity levels measured?
 the researcher has no control over the variables; he can only report what has happened
or what is happening

79
Introduction – Classification of Research – Purpose

 Goals of Exploratory Research:


 Become familiar with the basic facts, setting, and concerns;
 Develop well-grounded picture of the situation;
 Develop tentative theories, generate new ideas, conjectures, or hypotheses;
 Determine the feasibility of conducting the study;
 Formulate questions and refine issues for more systematic inquiry; and
 Develop techniques and a sense of direction for future research.
 For exploratory research, the researcher may use different sources for getting information
like: Experience surveys, Secondary data analysis, Case studies, Pilot studies.

80
Introduction – Classification of Research – Purpose

 Goals of Descriptive Research:


 Describe the situation in terms of its characteristics i.e. provide an accurate profile of a
group;
 Give a verbal or numerical picture (%) of the situation;
 Present background information;
 Create a set of categories or classify the information;
 Clarify sequence, set of stages; and
 Focus on ‘who,’ ‘what,’ ‘when,’ ‘where,’ and ‘how’ but not why?

81
Introduction – Classification of Research – Purpose

 Analytical/explanatory research - goes beyond description to establish relationships


that explain how and why

 E.g. Is there a positive association between the rewards given to employees and
productivity level?

 Predictive research - goes even further by generalising from the analysis to make
predictions on the basis of hypothesised general relationships

 E.g. Which rewards predict productivity levels?

82
Introduction – Classification of Research – Exercise

Exercise 2. Exploratory, descriptive, analytical or predictive studies?

1. Why have the sales of our products in the UK been so high?

2. What are our sales in the UK compared to France over the last five years?

3. How can we improve our sales in France?

4. Why are our sales lower in Germany than in the UK or France?

5. Will a change in packaging improve our sales in France?

6. Is it possible to identify the factors that reduce the sale of illegal copies of our products?

83
Introduction – Classification of Research – Process/Data/Enquiry

 Quantitative approach
 focus is on measuring phenomena and analysing quantitative research data
using objective, statistical methods to gain understanding
 is based on the measurement of quantitative figure or quantity or amount.
 E.g. What is the absentee rate among a particular group of employees (in
offices)/students (in schools)?
 Qualitative approach
 is concerned with subjective assessment of attitudes, opinions, and behavior.
 Words, pictures, and narrative can be used to add meaning to numbers.
Numbers can be used to add precision to words, pictures, and narrative.
 E.g. What are the feelings of employees faced with redundancy?

84
Introduction – Classification of Research – Process/Data/Enquiry

 Mixed method approach

 research is often pluralistic - researchers often combine quantitative and

qualitative research methods within the same study.

 Mixed-method research strategies are particularly effective in policy-oriented

research and the contribution that qualitative research can make to policy

evaluation is increasingly being recognized.

85
Introduction – Classification of Research – Process/Data/Enquiry

86
Introduction – Classification of Research – Outcome/Use/Audience

 Research may be undertaken either to understand the fundamental nature of a social


reality (basic research) or to apply knowledge to address specific practical issues
(applied research).

 Applied research

 aims at finding solution for an immediate pressing problem facing a society or an


industrial unit or business organization (designed to apply its findings to solving a
specific, existing problem)

 E.g. How can energy be saved in a particular workplace?

87
Introduction – Classification of Research – Outcome/Use/Audience

 Basic/Pure/Fundamental research
 is designed to make a contribution to general knowledge and theoretical understanding,
rather than solve a specific problem
 is mainly concerned with generalizations and with the formulation of a theory.
 It is primarily concerned with the understanding of the fundamental nature of social
reality.
 It is the source of most scientific ideas and ways of thinking about the world.
 It is mostly exploratory in nature.
 E.g. How can business travellers be encouraged to reduce their carbon footprints?

88
Introduction – Classification of Research – Outcome

89
Introduction – Classification of Research – Logic

 Deductive research - a theoretical framework is developed and then tested by


empirical observation

 From the general to the particular

 E.g. Does motivation theory explain productivity levels among a particular group of
employees?

 Inductive research - theory is developed from the observation of empirical reality

 From the particular to the general

 E.g. Productivity levels are lower in the afternoon than the morning, so you
conclude they vary with the number of hours worked

90
Introduction – Classification of Research - Exercise

Exercise 3. Classifying research (delete as appropriate)


1. A study to find out what factors made an advertising campaign for a major client such a
success is an example of
 Exploratory/ Descriptive/ Analytical/ Predictive research
2. Pilot projects are a common type of
 Exploratory/ Descriptive/ Analytical/ Predictive research
3. A study that tests relationships between variables takes a
 Quantitative/ Qualitative approach
4. A factory manager notes that productivity levels are higher when the weather is cooler and
concludes that employees work harder in cold weather. This is an example of a
 Deductive/ Inductive process
91
Introduction – Classification of Research – Time dimension

 Time dimension in research - Time is an important element of any research design.


 Research
 Can be one time or longitudinal research,
 can be field setting or laboratory based or simulation research,
 Can be inferential, experimental or simulation studies,
 can also be clinical or diagnostic research, etc.
 Quantitative research may be divided into two groups in terms of the time dimension
 A single point in time (cross sectional)
 Multiple points research (longitudinal research)
 Cross –sectional research takes a snapshot approach to social world.
 This is the simplest and less costly research approach.
 Limitation – cannot capture social processes or changes.

92
Introduction – Classification of Research – Time dimension…

 Longitudinal research examines features of people or other units more than one time.
 It is usually more complex and costly than cross sectional research but is also more
powerful especially with respect to social changes.
 Time series research – this is longitudinal study on a group of people or other units across
multiple periods (e.g. time series data on inflation, stock price).
 The panel study – consists of a sample of study units (people, firms, etc.) randomly
selected, who are questioned on two or more occasions.
 The researcher observes exactly the same people group or organization across time
periods, each time using the snapshot approach.
 In panel study the focus is on individuals or households or firms.
 Example: interviewing the same people in 1991, 1993, 1995, etc., and observing the
change- a panel data set.

93
Introduction – Classification of Research – Time dimension…

 A cohort Analysis – is similar to the panel study, but rather than observing the exact
same people, a category of people who share similar life experience in a specified
period is studied.
 Hence the focus is on group of individuals not on specific individuals or households.
 Example: students from a particular year of matriculation.

94
Introduction – Steps in the systematic process of Research

 The following order concerning various steps provides a useful procedural


guideline regarding the research process:
1. Formulating the research problem………………………ch02
2. Preliminary/Extensive literature survey……..............ch03
3. Developing the hypothesis/research question……..ch02
4. Preparing the research design………………………….….ch03
5. Determining sample design…………………………………ch04
6. Developing instrument for collecting data……………ch05
7. Collecting the data……………………………………………….ch05
8. Data analysis and interpretation…………………………..ch06
9. Determining the implications and findings……………ch06
10. Making recommendations……………………………………ch06

Compiled by Andualem (2015/2023) 95


Introduction – The research process: an eight-step model

96
Introduction – The research process: an eight-step model

97
Introduction – Qualities of a good researcher

Intellectual
skills

Communication
Motivation
skills

Perseverance

Independence IT skills

Organizational
skills

98
Introduction – Qualities of a good researcher…

Evaluate your personal qualities and research skills Weak Strong


Intellectual skills (eg ability to learn, analyse, 1 2 3 4 5
synthesise)
Communication skills (written and verbal) 1 2 3 4 5

IT skills (eg Excel, statistics, database searching) 1 2 3 4 5

Organisational skills (eg administration, time mgt) 1 2 3 4 5

Independence (eg work alone with only guidance) 1 2 3 4 5

Motivation (reasons for doing the research) 1 2 3 4 5

Perseverance (eg overcome problems/complete) 1 2 3 4 5

99
Introduction – AcFn 3111

 End of Ch. 1 – Next Ch. 2

100

Common questions

Powered by AI

Ethical and ideological neutrality in research is critical for ensuring objectivity and minimizing bias in data analysis and presentation . It restricts the influence of personal beliefs, societal expectations, or funding biases on research outcomes, preserving the integrity and trustworthiness of scientific conclusions . Without neutrality, data interpretation could be skewed, leading to potentially misleading conclusions and decreasing the study's overall validity .

The main steps in the scientific method include: choosing a question, identifying a hypothesis, making testable predictions, designing an experiment, collecting data, determining results and their validity, and assessing whether results support or refute the hypothesis . These steps contribute to the reliability and validity of scientific knowledge by ensuring that propositions are tested systematically, using empirical evidence and logical reasoning, and that results can be independently verified and reproduced .

Informed consent is a fundamental ethical consideration in research involving human participants, requiring that participants are fully informed about the nature, purpose, and potential risks of the study before agreeing to participate . This ensures voluntary participation and respects the autonomy and dignity of individuals . Ethical considerations also demand that participants are made aware of their right to withdraw from the study at any time without penalty, underscoring the primacy of their informed and voluntary involvement .

The scientific method maintains ethical and ideological neutrality by requiring conclusions to be based on empirical data, uninfluenced by the researcher's personal beliefs or societal pressures . This neutrality is significant because it ensures objectivity, reduces bias, and allows persistent critical analysis of conclusions . Without this neutrality, findings could be compromised by subjective interpretations or external influences, undermining the credibility of scientific research .

Logic and evidence are pivotal in scientific theories' development and validation. Logic helps structure hypotheses and interpret patterns, giving coherence and consistency to theoretical frameworks . Evidence, derived from systematic observations, provides the empirical basis to test these hypotheses, allowing theories to be validated or refined . Together, they enable a cycle of theory building and testing, ensuring theories are grounded in reality and adaptable to new findings .

The scientific method ensures verifiability by making observations and results that can be independently confirmed by others through replication . This principle is important because it builds trust in scientific findings, as the repetition and consistency of results across various studies increase confidence in the reliability and generalizability of the conclusions drawn .

Scientific research is cumulative, meaning each study builds on previous knowledge and contributes to a larger body of evidence . This cumulative nature ensures that current research is contextualized within existing knowledge, preventing redundancy and enabling more informed conclusions. It implies that new knowledge can be integrated incrementally, facilitating a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of complex phenomena .

The principle of purposefulness ensures that research is conducted with a clear objective, guiding the study's design, methodology, and analysis . This focus enhances the study's relevance, maximizing its contribution to the field by addressing specific, meaningful questions or problems. It contributes to the quality and utility of the study by aligning efforts with explicit goals and practical applications .

A skeptical attitude is significant because it encourages constant questioning and reevaluation of scientific propositions, ensuring that findings are critically assessed and subjected to rigorous scrutiny . This mindset helps prevent the acceptance of conclusions without sufficient evidence and fosters a culture of inquiry and openness to new ideas, leading to robust scientific progress and innovation .

Reporting negative or unexpected results is crucial because it ensures a complete and honest picture of the research landscape, reducing the risk of biased science due to selective reporting . These results can stimulate further investigation, refinement of hypotheses, and the development of new studies. They contribute to the overall scientific knowledge body, providing insights into the limitations of current theories and methodologies .

You might also like