Millipore Merck MAS-100
Millipore Merck MAS-100
The scope of the new norm is to establish the The basis for an efficient microbial air sampler is a good
requirements, recommendations and methodology physical and biological efficacy:
for microbiological contamination control in clean
"The physical collection efficiency is the cut-off size
controlled environments. The document is limited to
(d50 value) which defines the aerodynamic equivalent
viable microbial contamination and refers to ISO 14644
particle diameter size at which the sampler collects 50
about non-viable contamination. ISO 14698 is valid
% of the particles in the air [12] [13]. The average
throughout the rest of the world while EN 17141 2020
equivalent diameters of microbe-carrying particles
will replace it in the European Union.
(MCPs) that form the cfu are generally larger than 1
This application note will evaluate if the new EN µm and a d50 value smaller than 2 µm is considered
17141 norm will affect the validation requirements of appropriate. The d50 value can be calculated for
volumetric air samplers described in ISO 14698. impaction samplers with multiple holes or those using
rectangular slits. For active air samplers based on
Comparison of EN 17141 and ISO 14698 impingement and or cyclonic operational principles,
no d50 value can be calculated. For all active
requirements on microbial air samplers
microbiological air samplers, the effects of impact
stress and the effect of the media dehydration during
ISO 14698 requirements for microbial air samplers are
the sampling period are further considerations.
more detailed, but generally match the requirements of
EN 17141. The physical collection efficiency is influenced by
both inlet or extraction efficiency and by separation
The requirements for validation are newly defined in the
efficiency. Inlet or extraction efficiency is a function
EN 17141. The supplier of the sampler shall demonstrate
of the inlet design of the sampler and its ability to
the collection efficiency of the sampler, the sampling
collect particles from the air in a representative way
techniques shall be validated, and the volumetric air flow
and transport the particles to the impaction nozzle
of the sampler shall be periodically calibrated.
or the filter. Separation efficiency is the ability of the
sampling device to separate and collect particles of
different sizes from the air stream by impaction onto
the collection medium or into the filter medium. The
physical collection efficiency is based on the physical
characteristics of the sampling device such as airflow,
orifice shape, orifice size and the number of orifices."
Table 1. Comparison of requirements for sampling devices and microbial air samplers in EN 17141 and
ISO 14698:
Requirements EN 17141 Corresponding Requirements out of ISO 14698
Accessibility into the clean controlled environment for the sampling device • Ease of cleaning and disinfection or sterilization
• Ease of handling (weight, size) and operation (ease of
use, auxiliary equipment, dependence on vacuum pumps,
water electricity, etc.)
Effect of the sampling device on the process or environment to be monitored • Disturbance of unidirectional air flow by sampling
apparatus
• The exhaust air from the sampling apparatus should not
contaminate the environment being sampled or be re-
aspirated by the device
• Possible intrinsic addition of viable particles to the
biocontamination to be measured
Efficiency and precision of the sampling method • Collection accuracy and efficacy
.. a d50 value smaller than 2 µm is considered appropriate … / …For all active • Appropriate suction flow rate for low levels of viable
microbiological air samplers, the effects of impact stress and the effect of the airborne particles
media dehydration during the sampling period are further considerations • Appropriate impact/airflow velocity
• Sensitivity of the viable particle to the sampling procedure
2
Validation Results for MAS-100® Microbial Air Samplers
Every variance of air flow, such as flow rates or configuration of the sampling head (e.g. numbers and size of holes of
the sieve plate) might influence the physical and biological efficiency of microbial air samplers. Therefore, we validate
various instruments of the MAS-100® air sampler family at a competent external body (PHE Biosafety group in Porton
Down), England individually. The qualified instruments are indicated in figure 1.
2.
1.
4.
3.
Figure 1. Instruments validated according ISO 14698 and consequently to EN 17141 by an external competent body
1.1. MAS-100 NT® (instrument configuration identical to 1.3. MAS-100 Iso NT®
MAS-100 NT® with filter and MAS-100 NT Ex® with or 1.4. MAS-100 Iso MH® (2 separate validations for either 1 m or 9
without filter) m tube length between sampling head and control unit)
1.2. MAS-100 VF®
The validation of the physical efficiency takes place in better than the calculated values. The calculated d50
test room of 20 m3 with turbulent air. The test sampler of the tested microbial air samplers is 1.1 µm at a flow
and reference membrane filtration device are positioned rate of 100 liter/min and using a sieve plate with 300 x
in the same distance and height from the spinning 0.6 mm holes.
top aerosol generator. Washed spores of Bacillus
The biological efficiency is validated against a Casella
atrophaeus NCTC 10073 are mixed with different
Slit Sampler and the results are indicated in figure 3.
concentrations of potassium iodide in order to achieve
The biological efficiency is calculated by the recovery
the various particles sizes. The spores are distributed
of the ratio of cfu of a mixture of Bacillus atrophaeus
homogeneously using spinning top aerosol generator
NCTC 10073 spores and Staphylococcus epidermidis
to the sampling devices. As culture medium TSA w.
NCTC 11047.
LTHTh - ICRplus (reference number 1466830020) plates
are used. After sampling, the filter is transferred on Biological efficiency = Ratio of SE/BA sampled by test
to culture medium plates and all plates are incubated. device/Ratio of SE/BA sampled by Casella Slit sampler x100
Afterwards the CFU are counted and the recovery rate
for each particles size is calculated. The biological efficiciency of the MAS-100® air samplers is
indicated in figure 3. For all tested MAS-100® microbial air
The test results of the validation of physical efficiency samplers, the biological efficiency is above 70%.
of the instruments show a d50 value of less than 1 µm
for all test samplers (see figure 2). The test results The full test reports can be reviewed during an audit.
are comparable for all tested instruments and are
3
Figure 2. Test results of physical efficiency for various MAS-100® Figure 3. Test results of biological efficiency of various MAS-100®
microbial air samplers microbial air samplers
Conclusion References
• EN 17141 (2020): Cleanrooms and associated controlled
The requirements for volumetric microbial air environments - Biocontamination control
samplers do not differ significantly between the • ISO 14698-1 (2003): Cleanrooms and associated controlled
environments - Biocontamination control - Part 1: General principles
EN 17141 and ISO 14698-1. They should provide and methods
accurate and reliable results. • Physical and Biological Efficiency Testing of MAS-100 VF® - Techniques
described in ISO 14698-1: Report No. 14/013 A (2015) - (PHE Biosafety
The MAS-100 NT, MAS-100 VF, MAS-100 Iso NT ®
group in Porton Down)
and the MAS-100 Iso MH® have been validated • Physical and Biological Efficiency Testing of MAS-100 Iso MH® - 1m -
according to the requirements of ISO 14698-1 Techniques described in ISO 14698-1: Report No. 14/013 B (2015)
- (PHE Biosafety group in Porton Down)
and consequently to EN 17141 by an external
• Physical and Biological Efficiency Testing of MAS-100 Iso MH® - 9m -
competent body. Techniques described in ISO 14698-1: Report No. 14/013 C (2015)
- (PHE Biosafety group in Porton Down)
The physical efficiency is comparable for all tested
• Physical and Biological Efficiency Testing of MAS-100 Iso NT® -
instruments and provide a d50 value of less than Techniques described in ISO 14698-1: Report No. 14/013 D (2015)
1 µm. The biological efficiency is above 70% - (PHE Biosafety group in Porton Down)
compared to a Casella Slit Sampler. • Physical and Biological Efficiency Testing of MAS-100 NT® - Techniques
described in ISO 14698-1: Report No. 14/013 E (2015) - (PHE Biosafety
According to the validation results a re- group in Porton Down)
qualification of these instruments is not required.
Merck KGaA
Frankfurter Strasse 250
64293 Darmstadt, Germany
For contact information for your For Technical Services, please visit,
country at SigmaAldrich.com/offices SigmaAldrich.com/techservice
SigmaAldrich.com/environmentalmonitoring
© 2020 Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Merck, the vibrant M, Millipore, Sigma-Aldrich and MK_AN6557EN Ver. 1.0
MBV are trademarks of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany or its affiliates. All other trademarks are the property of their respective 32802
owners. Detailed information on trademarks is available via publicly accessible resources. 10/2020
Application Note
Equipment Procedure
Testing environment: Pharmaceutical Safety Isolator The MAS-100 NT instruments were positioned close to
from SKAN AG. 840 ppm H2O2, controlled by Dräger each other inside the PSI isolator. The perforated lids
sensor for high concentration (HC) hydrogen peroxide. were removed and placed next to the instrument.
Instruments tested: 2x MAS-100 NT The instruments were left turned off while exposed
to H2O2.
Airflow: 100 Standard liters per min (SLPM) ± 2.5%
The test chamber was filled with 840 ppm hydrogen
Instrument 1: SNR: 108400, usage time: 1971 h
peroxide. The chamber was vented daily, and the air
Instrument 2: SNR 108302, usage time: 1924 h samplers were checked with the DA-100 NT® digital
anemometer. The calibration (but no adjustment) was
Calibration instrument: DA-100 NT® digital vane performed automatically, and the resulting calibration
wheel anemometer (±1% reproducibility, temperature protocol was generated and saved.
and pressure compensated). MBV PC – based software
used to perform automated airflow calibration. This procedure was repeated for 12 days to simulate
approx. 10 years of weekly H2O2 decontamination
Reagents: 50% hydrogen peroxide (Solvay) (see Figure 2):
12 d * 24 h/d = approximately 288 h of VHP exposure
10 y * 50 weeks/y * 1 decontamination cycle/week =
500 decontamination cycles
288 h/500 decontamination cycles = 0.58 h/average
dwell time
Dwell time
840
Gassing stage
H2O2 conc. [ppm]
Venting stage
1 2 3 11 12
Time [days]
Initial Final
Calibration 2 Calibration 3
calibration calibration
Figure 2: Schematic of VHP exposure, calibration and decontamination cycle. The time required for the gassing and
venting stages are exaggerated in comparison to the dwell time.
2
Proven resistance to H2O2 exposure The electronic components were visibly affected but
not damaged. To protect flow sensor and electronics
The results of the daily airflow calibration of the two H2O2 decontamination must be performed with the
MAS-100 NT® are presented in Figure 3. Throughout blower inactive.
the 12 days exposure of the air samplers to H2O2 the
airflow remained within the specification of ±2.5% Decolorization of the blue anodized aluminum parts
of the target air flow 100 SLPM. As the pneumatic (perforated lid 300 x 0.6 and rings) was apparent
performance of the air sampler during the simulated (Figure 4). The decolorization is only a cosmetic
time frame of 10 years remained unaffected, we degradation and has no effect on the functioning of the
concluded that the instrument can withstand at least air sampler.
the simulated 500 calibration cycles.
105. 0
Airflow [% of initial
Airflow specification
adjustment airlow]
102. 5
of MAS-100 NT®
100. 0
97.5
95.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Time [days]
Instrument 1 Instrument 2 Target (100 SLPM)
components. These were placed inside the same test Note: The MAS-100 NT Ex® is the explosion proofed version of the
MAS-100 NT® and the results described above can be extended to
chamber and assessed optically after 12 days exposure. that product
3
Request a demo at: SigmaAldrich.com/em-pharma-info
Acknowledgement
Many thanks to our partner MBV providing content and graphics
MBV AG
Industriestrasse 9
8712 Stäfa
Switzerland
www.mbv.ch
For contact information for your For Technical Services, please visit,
country at SigmaAldrich.com/offices SigmaAldrich.com/techservice
SigmaAldrich.com/environmentalmonitoring
© 2020 Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Merck, the vibrant M and Millipore are trademarks of Lit. No. MK_BR7166EN Ver. 1.0
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany or its affiliates. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Detailed information 34149
on trademarks is available via publicly accessible resources. 12/2020
Application Note
Figure 1: From left to the right: portable air samplers MAS-100 NT® and MAS-100 VF® and installed air sampler MAS-100 Iso NT®
Workflow
The sampling workflow with BioTrends EM® Mobile is very intuitive and can be summarized in the following steps
(see Figure 3):
1. Select the point to sample*
2. Select the MAS in use* (for active air samples)
3. Acquire the serial number of the plate (or swab) used, scanning the datamatrix code
4. Confirm the sampling by selecting “Save”
5. Repeat steps 1-4 for all points to sample. All activities are recorded in real time within the central system.
* The sampling point and the sampling device (steps 1-2) can be selected from the list or by scanning the
identification datamatrix code with the PDA.
Figure 3: BioTrends EM® Mobile acquires data about media and devices used from the scanner for datamatrix
codes integrated into the PDA.
2
After the sampling process, it is possible to download the data recorded by the MAS100® air samplers allowing the
BioTrends EM® system to combine the data from the two sources (MAS and PDA), giving the user more accurate
qualitative information.
For example, using the data from the device, it is possible to confirm the volume of sampled air.
The BioTrends EM® system can also compare the sampled amount versus the one expected and defined in the
sampling plan – highlighting any discrepancies or errors that occurred during instrument setup.
The workflow to download data from MAS in BioTrends EM® (see Figure 4) is very intuitive:
1. Connect the MAS-100® air sampler to a PC in which BioTrends EM® is installed.
2. In BioTrends EM® select the menu item
“Devices MAS Import Data”.
From this window, the user has a complete overview of the data present in the MAS memory.
3. Proceed to launch the “Import” function. The imported data are recorded in BioTrends EM® and cleaned from
the MAS memory.
4. By selecting the menu item
“Devices MAS View Data” it is possible to analyze the outcome of previously imported data and
highlight any anomalies.
Figure 4: Data from PDA and MAS-100® air samplers are collected in BioTrends EM® to perform deep analysis
3
Data Analysis with BioTrends EM® Software:
At the end of the monitoring process, it is possible to analyze data in a fast and reliable way, thanks to BioTrends
EM® software.
The software allows you to perform searches by applying filters for classes, environments, rooms, personnel, and
all the other relevant characteristics associated with the sampling points.
The automatic generation of statistics associated with the search carried out facilitates the review of the
alert limits.
The outcomes thus obtained can be used to generate trends, reports, and graphs in a few "clicks".
SigmaAldrich.com/environmental-monitoring
SigmaAldrich.com
© 2024 Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Merck, the vibrant M, BioReliance, Millipore, Milli-Q, MK_AN12262EN Ver. 2.0
SAFC, Sigma-Aldrich, and Supelco are trademarks of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany or its affiliates. All other trademarks are the 57641
property of their respective owners. Detailed information on trademarks is available via publicly accessible resources. 08/2024
MAS-100® Air Samplers: Manufactured by MBV AG, Switzerland, www.mbv.ch, MBV.
Application Note
•§
211.68 (requiring that “backup data are exact and For the microbiological path in environmental
complete,” and “secure from alteration, inadvertent monitoring, a rough overview of the required steps is
erasures, or loss”) indicated in figure 1. Depending on the available IT
infrastructure, these steps can be performed manually
•§
212.110(b) (requiring that data be “stored to using paper-based documentation, using digital tools or
prevent deterioration or loss”) a hybrid.
Trending
Operator
Prepare analysis in
transfers Operator takes Culture CFU on plates
sampling plan cased of OOS:
sampling samples media are are counted &
based on risk Idenfification of
equipment into according to transferred to reported for
microbes root
analysis manufacturing sampling plan incubator trending
cause analysis
environment
and CAPA
2
Protected mode: Checkbox <<Active>> Switches the
protected mode for the instrument on.
This function blocks manual intervention on the instrument.
The only accessible functions on the instrument are now
reduced to starting and stopping a sampling, and the user
has only read access.
Figure 2: Protection of the MAS-100 NT® air sampler from changing settings by the operator (see software manual of MAS-100 NT®)
Compliance to requirements of 21 CFR Part 11 and Data integrity when using MAS-100 NT® air sampler with
Novatek EM Software are listed below:
DESCRIPTION DATA INTEGRITY & 21 CFR PART 11 NOVATEK EM AND MAS-100 NT® INTEGRATION
11.1 Once the record is deemed official and approved, it will be blocked and
Records to be trustworthy, reliable, and generally Equivalent to cannot be further modified. User cannot delete other users’ data; this is
paper records. permission controlled and is for administrative users only. Full audit trail for
the integration and data transfer.
11.1 E Novatek Software Applications source code and Client System Validation are
Computer systems (including hardware and software), controls, readily available for inspection by any regulatory authority including but not
and attendant documentation maintained under this part shall be limited to the FDA.
readily available for, and subject to, FDA Inspection.
11.10 (a) As per the regulations (21 CFR part 11, GAMP 5) and quality requirements
Validation of systems to ensure accuracy, reliability, consistent the system will be fully validated to assure the quality of the system and the
intended performance, and the ability to discern invalid or altered integrity of the records contained within the system
records.
11.10 (b) The software hardware is validated to produce complete copies in human
The ability to generate accurate and complete copies of records readable and electronic forms. All sections can be printed for review.
in both human readable and electronic form suitable for
inspection, review, and copying by the agency.
11.10 (c) Once the data is approved and deemed official it cannot be altered except
Protection of records to enable their accurate and ready retrieval by an authorized person. In the case where data is altered this change is
throughout the records retention period. tracked in the system wide audit trails. All changes are logged automatically.
Data is maintained throughout the record retention period as per the
predicate regulations.
3
DESCRIPTION DATA INTEGRITY & 21 CFR PART 11 NOVATEK EM AND MAS-100 NT® INTEGRATION
11.10 (d) Novatek Software has a fully integrated user access management feature
Limiting system access to authorized individuals. which limits access to the system and the MAS-100 NT®. No person without
a valid login can access the application.
11.10 (e) There are audit trail entries made while operators are creating or modifying
Use of secure, computer-generated, time-stamped audit trails to records using the MAS-100 NT®. Each time data is saved to the database,
independently record the date and time of operator entries and the name of the user and the date/time stamp is automatically saved to the
actions that create, modify, or delete electronic records. Record audit trail for the data in question.
changes shall not obscure previously recorded information
11.10 (f) Operation system checks include the transfer of protocol from Novatek EM
Use of operational system checks to enforce permitted to MAS-100 NT®. Sampling as per MAS-100 NT® instructions and transfer of
sequencing of steps and events, as appropriate. data from MAS-100 NT® to Novatek EM securely. Within the Novatek system
completing data entry prior to approving data is enforced. Data does not
display in certain grids until it is approved. This sequencing of events is
inherent throughout the system.
11.10 (g) Only users with active logins and valid passwords can log into the system
Use of authority checks to ensure that only authorized to access the MAS-100 NT®. The system password must consist of a
individuals can use the system, electronically sign a record, minimum six characters. After a number of unsuccessful attempts to access
access the operation or computer system input or output device, the system, the user ID becomes inactive and an email is sent to the
alter the record, or perform the operation at hand. administrator urgently and immediately advising of potential tampering. Only
the System Administrator can re-activate the user.
11.10 (h) The data is tracked to the user who captured it along with the date and time
Use of device (e.g., terminal) checks to determine, as stamp. The authenticity of the data is checked via passwords each time data
appropriate, the validity of the source of data input or is saved.
operational instruction.
11.10 (l) All personnel will be fully trained to their role in the system. This training will
Determination that persons who develop, maintain, or use be conducted and documented according to SOP on training.
electronic record/electronic signature systems have the
education, training, and experience to perform their assigned
tasks.
11.10 (k) System documentation will be stored in a document control/management
Use of appropriate controls over systems documentation
including: system. A change control procedure for computerized systems is in place to
(1) Adequate controls over the distribution of, access to and use ensure correct version of the documentation (IQ, OQ and user manual) are
of documentation for system operation and maintenance. used.
(2) Revision and change control procedures to maintain an
audit trail that documents time sequenced development and
moderation of systems documentation.
11.30 The ability to control user access via user ID and password is in the Novatek
Persons who use open systems to create, modify, maintain, EM software. Critical data such as passwords are encrypted in the database.
or transmit electronic records shall employ procedures and
controls designed to ensure the authenticity, integrity, and, as
appropriate, the confidentiality of electronic records from the
point of their creation to the point of their receipt
11.50 (a) In the Novatek EM software MAS-100 NT® integration:
Signed electronic records shall contain information associated
(1) The name of person who entered the data is shown on the screen.
with the signing that clearly indicates all of the following:
(2) The date and time of entry is automatically attached to the data.
(1) The printed name of the signer;
(3) Once reviewed the data will be blocked from further changes by the
(2) The date and time of signature execution;
users. Only the authorized person can change the data. All operations will be
(3) The meaning (such as review, approval, responsibility, or logged.
authorship) associated with the signature.
11.50 (b)
The items identified above (11.50 (a)) shall be subject to the
same controls as for electronic records and shall be included as
part of any human readable form of the electronic record.
11.70 In the Novatek EM software MAS-100 NT® integration:
Electronic signatures and hand-written signatures executed to The password along with username will ensure that signatures cannot be
electronic records shall be linked to their respective electronic excised, copied. No two people can have the same username hence there
records to ensure that the signatures cannot be excised, copied, is no possibility of transferring the authority. Once the person leaves the
or otherwise transferred to falsify an electronic record by company, his username will be deactivated by the system admin. In addition,
ordinary means. after a default time-period the password expires. All electronic signatures are
linked to their respective printed records in that the name, date and time and
a manual sign offline is included on all reports where required.
11.100 (a) In the Novatek EM software MAS-100 NT® integration
Each electronic signature shall be unique to one individual and does not accept two people with the same username.
shall not be reused by, or reassigned to, anyone else.
4
DESCRIPTION DATA INTEGRITY & 21 CFR PART 11 NOVATEK EM AND MAS-100 NT® INTEGRATION
11.100 (b)Before an organization establishes assigns, certifies, In the Novatek EM software MAS-100 NT® integration tracks the ownership
or otherwise sanction an individual's electronic signature, or any of each electronic signature in that all user information is recorded. This
element of such electronic signature, the organization shall verify information includes First name, Last name, Date of Birth, Employee number,
the identity of the individual. and Date of Hire.
11.100 (c)Persons using electronic signatures shall, prior to or
at the time of such use, certify to the agency that the electronic
signatures in their system.
11.200 (a)(1) In the Novatek EM software MAS-100 NT® integration:
Electronic signatures that are not based upon biometrics shall: There is a username and password associated with each person using
the software. The username and password make up the two components
Employ at least two distinct identification components such as an required to be considered an electronic signature.
identification code and password.
11.200 (a)(1)(i) In the Novatek EM software with MAS-100 NT® integration, at initial login
both the username and the password are required to access the system.
When an individual executes a series of signings during a single, (Two components)
continuous period of controlled system access, the first signing
shall be executed using all electronic signature components; At each subsequent saving of data within the login session, the software asks
subsequent signings shall be executed using at least one for the password to verify the authenticity of the person entering the data.
electronic signature component that is only executable by, and (One component)
designed to be used only by, the individual.
A user cannot enter and save data if a different user opened the program.
11.200 (a)(1)(ii) Upon saving, only the password of the user who opened the application is
accepted.
When an individual executes one or more signings not performed
during a single, continuous period of controlled system access, Each person enters the software once with a unique username and password.
each signing shall be executed using all the electronic signature Concurrent sessions are disallowed by the application.
components.
Signatures can be used only by their genuine owner.
11.200 (a)(3) In the Novatek EM software, MAS-100 NT® integration is designed such that
only the user can know both components of an electronic signature; the
Electronic signatures that are not based upon biometrics shall: username and password.
Be administered and executed to ensure that attempted use
of an individual’s electronic signature by anyone other than its
genuine owner requires collaboration of two or more individuals.
Controls for identification codes and passwords. In the Novatek EM software with MAS-100 NT® integration, when a user is
added to the system, the system enforces a password change at first logon.
(a) Maintaining the uniqueness of each combined identification
code and password, such that no two individuals have the same Each user has a unique name. The software does not accept two people with
combination of identification code and password. the same username.
There is a username and password associated with each person using the
software.
11.300 (b) In the Novatek EM software with MAS-100 NT® integration, the password
expires within a predefined time limit. The user is requested to enter a new
Ensuring that identification code and password issuances are password after the expiration of the password.
periodically checked, recalled or revised (e.g., to cover such
events as password aging). The same password cannot be used twice.
11.300 (d) In the Novatek EM software with MAS-100 NT® integration the password
consists of an adequate level of complexity.
Use of transaction safeguards to prevent unauthorized use
of passwords and/or identification codes, and to detect and After a number of unsuccessful attempts, the user ID becomes inactive. Only
report in an immediate and urgent manner any attempts at the System Administrator can reactivate the user.
their unauthorized use to the system security unit, any, as
appropriate, to organizational management. An email is triggered to immediately and urgently inform the system
administrator of the potential illegal activity.
Following loss management procedures to electronically In the Novatek EM software with MAS-100 NT® integration any user can
de-authorize lost, stolen, missing, or otherwise potentially be deactivated from the system, ensuring that there is no possibility of
compromised tokens, cards, and other devices that bear or unauthorized data entry.
generate identification code or password information, and to
issue temporary or permanent replacements using suitable,
rigorous controls.
5
Request a demo at: SigmaAldrich.com/em-pharma-info
For contact information for your For Technical Services, please visit,
country at SigmaAldrich.com/offices SigmaAldrich.com/techservice
SigmaAldrich.com/environmentalmonitoring
© 2021 Merck KGaA, Darmstadt Germany and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Merck, Millipore and the vibrant M are trademarks MK_AN7600EN Ver. 0.0
of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt Germany. MAS-100 NT® is a trademark of MBV AG, Switzerland. All other marks are the property of their 36585
respective owners. More information on our branded products and services on www.milliporesigma.com. 06/2021
Application Note
Table 1. Physical and biological efficiency of the MAS-100® family (results derived from
independent validation of MAS-100® family acc. ISO 14698 with TSA + LTHTh Cat. No. 146683)
Characteristics Iso-MH (1) Iso-MH (9) Iso NT VF
Physical Efficiency for particle size of 0.8 µm 60.41 62.58 60.20 n/a n/a
Physical Efficiency for particle size of 1.0 µm n/a n/a n/a 78.77 84.18
Physical Efficiency for particle size of 1.3 µm 71.68 82.60 76.91 84.10 85.81
Physical Efficiency for particle size of 2.2 µm 96.90 91.54 91.96 91.76 94.22
Physical Efficiency for particle size 5.4-6 µm 99.04 93.27 90.24 92.65 99.65
Biological Efficiency 76.74 73.74 78.08 82.62 76.78
We offer a variety of TSA – ICR formulations with and without neutralizers. Table 2 lists the ICR articles used in this application note
MAS-100 instruments manufactured by MBV AG, Switzerland, www.mbv.ch, MBV. Air. Nothing else.
Figure 1. Sampling concept for active air sampling. Two MAS-100 NT® instruments were placed in different
positions on two tables in an uncontrolled environment outside of cleanroom conditions
MAS-100 instruments manufactured by MBV AG, Switzerland, www.mbv.ch, MBV. Air. Nothing else.
For both test trials, agar plates were tested in a After sampling, all plates were incubated for 2 days at
specific order (table 3). Before sampling of a 1000 32.5 ±2.5 °C. All lockable plates were incubated in the
liter volume every sampling step consisted of a three locked ("closed") position. After incubation, all visible
minutes delay. In case a reduced sampling volume of colonies were counted and corrected by the Feller table.
500 liters (run 7 on day 1) or 250 Liter (run 7 on day
2) the final CFU measurements were scaled-up to a
1000 liter sampling volume.
2
Results and Conclusion
The single colony counts within this non-controlled environment varied between 33 and 97 CFU, whereby the two
different ICR plate media formulations showed comparable recoveries, as shown in figure 2.
Figure 2. CFU/m3 recovered with MAS-100 NT® in a non-controlled environment on 2 consecutive days for the settle plates TSA w. LTHTh - ICR+
and TSA w. LTHThio sedi. - ICR
MAS-100 instruments manufactured by MBV AG, Switzerland, www.mbv.ch, MBV. Air. Nothing else.
The mean recovered CFU per 1 m³ for each medium are shown in table 4 below.
3
The results indicate that there was no significant difference between the recoveries obtained with
the 2 different TSA media. It can be concluded that the biological efficiency, which was validated
for the MAS-100 NT® instrument with the TSA w. LTHTh - ICR+ (Cat. No. 146683) settle plate,
was also maintained when using TSA w. LTHThio sedi. -ICR (Cat. No. 146786) which contains a
lower concentration of sodium thiosulfate.
For contact information for your For Technical Services, please visit,
country at SigmaAldrich.com/offices SigmaAldrich.com/techservice
SigmaAldrich.com/environmentalmonitoring
© 2020 Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Merck, the vibrant M and Millipore are trademarks of MK_AN6446EN Ver. 1.0
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany or its affiliates. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Detailed information 32380
on trademarks is available via publicly accessible resources. 09/2020