0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views35 pages

Reliability and Validity in Testing

The document provides an overview of reliability and validity in psychological testing, emphasizing their importance in ensuring accurate assessments. It discusses various types of reliability, such as test-retest and internal consistency, as well as different forms of validity, including content and criterion-related validity. Key takeaways highlight that reliability refers to consistency while validity pertains to accuracy, both of which are essential for effective psychological evaluations.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views35 pages

Reliability and Validity in Testing

The document provides an overview of reliability and validity in psychological testing, emphasizing their importance in ensuring accurate assessments. It discusses various types of reliability, such as test-retest and internal consistency, as well as different forms of validity, including content and criterion-related validity. Key takeaways highlight that reliability refers to consistency while validity pertains to accuracy, both of which are essential for effective psychological evaluations.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Understanding Reliability

and Validity in
Psychological Testing
AN OVERVIEW
 Definition of reliability and validity
Introduction  Importance in psychological assessment
 Real-world examples
Why Reliability  • Psychological assessments impact hiring,
education, and mental health
and Validity  • Without reliability and validity, test results
Matter can be misleading
 • Consistency and stability in
Definition of measurement

Reliability  • Ensures test results remain the same


over time
The  • Measures the strength of the relationship
between test scores
Correlation  • Higher coefficients indicate greater
Coefficient reliability
Interpreting  • 0.90+ = Excellent reliability

Reliability  • 0.80-0.89 = Good

Coefficients  • 0.70-0.79 = Acceptable


 • Test construction errors
Sources of Error  • Environmental factors

Variance  • Examinee-related errors


 • Scorer and administration errors
Test-Retest Reliability

 • Measures consistency over time


 • Example: IQ test scores taken twice should be similar
Parallel-Forms Reliability

 • Compares different versions of the same test


 • Example: SAT Form A vs. SAT Form B
Internal Consistency

 • Measures how well test items relate to each other


 • Cronbach’s alpha (α) and split-half reliability
Inter-Rater Reliability

 • Ensures consistency between different raters


 • Example: Scoring of essay exams
Using and  • What is considered an acceptable
Interpreting reliability value?

Reliability  • Different standards for clinical vs.


educational testing
Coefficients
Reliability and  • Impact of reliability on interpretation
Individual  • Standard error of measurement (SEM)
and confidence intervals
Scores
Definition of  • The accuracy and meaningfulness of test
results
Validity  • A test must be valid to be useful
 • Does the test appear to measure what it
claims?
Face Validity  • Example: A depression questionnaire
should ask about mood, not math skills
 • Do test items cover the full range of the
Content concept?

Validity  • Example: A final exam must cover all


course topics
Criterion-  • Measures how well a test predicts future
performance or relates to another test
Related  • Example: SAT scores predicting college
Validity GPA
 • Predictive: Test predicts future outcomes
Predictive vs. (e.g., GRE scores predicting grad school
success)
Concurrent  • Concurrent: Test correlates with current
Validity outcomes (e.g., employment screening
tests)
 • Does the test measure the psychological
Construct concept it claims to?

Validity  • Example: Intelligence tests should


measure intelligence, not just vocabulary
Content-  • How experts evaluate test content
Description  • Example: Developing achievement
tests with subject matter experts
Procedures
Criterion-  • Examining whether test scores
correlate with performance
Prediction  • Example: Job performance tests and
Procedures actual work performance
Construct-  • Factor analysis in psychological tests
Identification  • Examples: Intelligence testing,
personality assessments
Procedures
How to Ensure 


• Conduct pilot testing
• Use expert reviews
Validity  • Revise and refine test items
Reliability vs.  • Can a test be reliable but not valid? Yes

Validity  • Can a test be valid but not reliable? No


 • A bathroom scale that always gives
Why Reliability the wrong weight is reliable but not
Alone is Not valid
• A test must be accurate, not just
Enough 
consistent
Ensuring Both  • Multiple test revisions
Reliability and  • Using statistical analysis to validate
measures
Validity
Sample of A
Test with High
Validity but
Low Reliability
• A PERSONALITY TEST PREDICTS
JOB PERFORMANCE WELL BUT HAS
INCONSISTENT SCORES OVER TIME
Sample of A Test with
High Reliability but Low
Validity
• A MATH TEST WHERE ALL QUESTIONS FOCUS ON MULTIPLICATION BUT
IGNORES OTHER MATH SKILLS
How Exam
 • Standardized procedures
Boards Ensure  • Psychometric analysis
High Reliability  • Continuous test updates
and Validity
 1. What does a high Cronbach’s alpha
Multiple- indicate?
2. What is an example of predictive
Choice

validity?
Questions  3. What is the relationship between
reliability and validity?
Common Pitfalls in Interpreting
Reliability & Validity

 • Confusing reliability with accuracy


 • Assuming all standardized tests are valid
Discussion Prompt:
Why Do Some Tests
Fail?
• FACTORS LIKE CULTURAL BIAS, POOR TEST DESIGN, AND
LACK OF PILOT TESTING
Improving
Reliability and  • Strategies: Better test design, pilot
Validity in Test testing, statistical analysis

Construction
Key Takeaways

 • Reliability = Consistency, Validity = Accuracy


 • Both are essential for quality psychological assessments
Final Thoughts

 • How to critically evaluate test quality


 • Why understanding these concepts is crucial for psychologists

You might also like