Mod 5 Factor Market
Mod 5 Factor Market
Module 5
Module 5: Factor Market
Clark vs Marshall
Marginal Net productivity
Wage determination under competitive conditions
Reference:
HL Ahuja
Factor market structure
Factor inputs --- Land, labour, capital and natural resources
𝑤.𝐿
Share of Labour =
𝑄
𝑟.𝐾
Share of Capital =
𝑄
Theory of Factor pricing
Demand for product; demand for factor?
Derived Demand
Equilibrium in the factor market depends on the extent of market power in output markets
Demand for factor input is derived from the demand for the goods and services that it is
used to produce
Provides link between markets for output and markets for input
Infertile land, uneducated labour??
Reference:
L N Dwivedi Factor Market
Perfect Competition
VMP of factor is equal to MRP (VMP = MRP since MR = Price)
Imperfect Competition
VMP > MRP
Concepts of Productivity
Reference:
HL Ahuja,
Koutsoyiannis Variable Total MPPL Price MRPL VMPL
Factor Production P = MR MPPL*MR MPPL*Price
1 20 -- 5 -- --
2 38 18 5 90 90
3 52 14 5 70 70
4 58 6 5 30 30
5 58 0 5 0 0
20 100
MPP MRP
MPPL MRPL
O 5 O 5
Labour Labour
Factor Pricing
Reference:
Koutsoyiannis
LN Dwivedi
Wage
Perfect Comp.
w E
SL
SL
MRP=MPP.P
MRP=MPP.MR
MRPL = D L Monopolistic
0 L 0 Hours of work
Hours of work
Labour Market
Supply of Labour
OH = Maximum number of hours
M1H = Income Leisure combination M4
Money Income/Wage
Income Leisure trade off --- inverse
HW = H24 – HL M3 E4
w4 LI 4
Leisure Income Preference function of individual E3
labour w3
M2 LI 3
Leisure income indifference curve
LI 2
Negative slope: substitution b/w leisure and w2 E2
income
M1 LI 1
𝑂𝑀 E1
W= w1
𝑂𝐻
Wage Work Offer Curve 0 L3 L L2 L1 H = 24
Backward bending??
Number of Hours
12
Supply of Labour
Labour Market • Backward sloping supply curve
• Leisure
Supply of
Labour
Wage Rate
100
50
20
0 4 10 24
2/27/2025
No. of working hours
Competitive Factor Markets
Large number of buyers and sellers
Labor, raw-material
Price taker
Aggregate demand and aggregate supply
A competitive factor market is in equilibrium when price of input
equates quantity demanded to quantity supplied, D = S
Economic rent:
Excess of wages paid above the minimum amount needed to hire
workers
Equilibrium in a Competitive Factor Market
W=D&S
• MPPL*P lies above MRPL
W = MRPL • W = MPPL
• VMPL > W
Wage
SL
Wage
• Lower input
• Q is below efficient level
SL
Vm
• VMP >MRP
E
w Wm
VMPL =MPPL*P
DL=MRPL DL=MRPL
0 0 L
L
Number of workers Number of workers
Reference:
Input Demand in the Short Run
Koutsoyiannis
LN Dwivedi
One Variable Input
Factor market profit maximisation condition
Addition to total costs by hiring additional unit of variable input = The input’s marginal revenue
Product
Price of input(MC)= MPP*MR (Price)
w = MRP
Additional unit of labour costs a firm Rs.200 an hour. The employment of another hour’s work
adds 5 units of output. The output units are sold at Rs.50 each
Solution:
w = MRP (MPP * P)
Given, w = Rs.200; MPP = 5; P = 50
w = MPP * P
w = 5*50
200 ≠ 250 (R > C)
Hiring additional labour for an extra hour adds more revenue than to costs
Therefore firm will employ more of a variable unit whenever MRP exceeds price of input
Input Demand in the Short Run
One Variable Input
Additional unit of labour costs a firm Rs.200 an hour. The employment of another hour’s work
adds 3 units of output. The output units are sold at Rs.50 each
w = Rs.200; MPP = 3; P = 50
w = MPP * P
w = 3*50
200 ≠150 (C > R)
Hiring additional labour for an extra hour added more cost than revenue (w>MRP)
Therefore firm will have to cut down employment of variable factor
Additional unit of labour costs a firm Rs.200 an hour. The employment of another hour’s work
adds 4 units of output. The output units are sold at Rs.50 each
w = Rs.200; MPP = 4; P = 50
w = MPP * P
w = 4*50
200 = 200 (C = R)
Firms has maximise its profits when w = MRP
A firm cannot increase its profit by altering its employment of variable inputs
Input Demand in the Short Run
Reference:
Koutsoyiannis
LN Dwivedi
Solution
L Q W MPPL MRPL=MPPL*Px Price is Rs.2 at all units of
0 0 16 (MR=P) output, implying Perfect
1 20 16 -- -- Competition
2 35 16 20 40
Profit maximising quantity
3 47 16 15 30 of labour is 5 units
4 57 16 12 24 5th unit of labour
W = 16 = MRP L
5 65 16 10 20
6 70 16 8 16
5 10
Input Demand in the Short Run
Reference:
Koutsoyiannis
LN Dwivedi
Solution
L Q W MPPL MRPL Profit maximising quantity
1 80 160 of labour is
??
2 140 160
3 188 160
4 228 160
5 260 160
6 280 160
7 296 160
Input Demand in the Short Run
Reference:
Koutsoyiannis
LN Dwivedi
Solution
L Q W MPPL MRPL Profit maximising quantity
1 80 160 80 640 of labour is 6 units
6th unit of labour
2 140 160 60 480
W = 160 = MRP L
3 188 160 48 384
4 228 160 40 320
5 260 160 32 256
6 280 160 20 160
7 296 160 16 128
Labour Market
Reference:
Koutsoyiannis
LN Dwivedi
When labour (L) is the firm’s only variable input to produce goods X. Find MPL, TRX, MRX, VMPL and
MRPL schedules
•When there is perfect competition in product market with fixed price of product Rs. 2.
•When there is imperfect competition in product market with following price schedule:
Labour Q P
0 0 0
1 100 2
2 200 1.8
3 280 1.6
4 340 1.4
5 380 1.2
6 400 1
Wage Determination Under Perfect
Reference:
Koutsoyiannis
LN Dwivedi
Competition in Product and Labour Market
Since Px > MR
VMP > MRP
Vm > Wm
W = MR:0
Reference:
Wage Determination Under Product
Monopoly and Perfect Competition in
Koutsoyiannis
LN Dwivedi
Labour Market
Units of Total Selling MPPL Total ∆TR Marginal MRP VMP
Labour Output Price Revenue Revenue MPP*MR MPP*P
(VF) ∆TR/∆Q
∆TR/MPPL
0 0 0
1 7 10
2 13.5 9
3 19 8
4 23 7
5 24 6
6 24 5
Reference:
Wage Determination Under Product
Monopoly and Perfect Competition in
Koutsoyiannis
LN Dwivedi
Labour Market
Units of Total Selling MPPL Total ∆TR Marginal MRP VMP
Labour Output Price Revenue Revenue MPP*MR MPP*P
(VF) ∆TR/∆Q
∆TR/MPPL
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Since Px > MR
1 7 10 7 70 70 10 70 70
VMP > MRP
2 13.5 9 6.5 122 52 8 52 58 Vm > Wm
3 19 8 5.5 152 30 5.5 30 44
4 23 7 4 161 9 2 8 28
5 24 6 1 144 -17 -17 -17 6
6 24 5 0 120 -24 -- -- --
Wage Determination Under Perfect
Reference:
Koutsoyiannis
LN Dwivedi
Competition in Product and Labour Market
MPL = 12 – 2L
Reference:
HL Ahuja Derivation of Demand for a Factor
Perfectly Competitive Market
MC = 10 + 8L
Reference:
Derivation of Demand for a Factor
HL Ahuja Monopsony & Competitive labour market
A firm has a monopsony in hiring labour while it sells its product in a perfectly
competitive market. Answer the following given the demand function VMP = 16 – L and
supply function W = 4 + L
What are its profit maximising quantity of labour and wage rate?
Calculate degree of monopsonistic exploitation of labour
How much labour will it employ if minimum wage of Rs.10 is imposed by the government?
Solution:
Monopsony equilibrium MC = VMP (MRP)
TC = w*L
TC = (4 + L) * L
TC = 4L + L2
𝑑𝑇𝐹𝐶
MC = 𝑑𝐿
MC = 4 + 2L
Reference:
HL Ahuja
Derivation of Demand for a Factor
Competitive Product Market and Monopsony Factor Market
Monopsony Market Monopsonistic Exploitation If Minimum Wage Rs.10
= MRP – Wage Rate
Equating MC = VMP (MR) Rs. 10 will become MC
First Calculate MRP (Note MRP=VMP=Wage)
MC = 4 + 2L ; VMP = 16 - L Equating MC = VMP
Substitute L = 4 in the demand for labour
4 + 2L = 16 - L function i.e VMP MC = 10; VMP = 16 – L
3L = 12 VMP = 16 - L 10 = 16 – L
VMP = 16 – 4
L=4 L=6
MRP = VMP = 12
Wage
factors of production in its current occupation
SL
Economic Rent
Actual earnings of factor – Reservation Price of the E
factors W
Surplus earning over and above its transfer earning
Transfer earnings of the units of factor employed is
B
measured by the area under the supply curve of the DL=MRPL
labour/factor
Solution:
At equilibrium D = S
Economic Rent = Area above SL
Wage
100000 – 3w = 2w supply curve, below equilibrium
w = Rs.20,000 wage rate 20,000
E
Given the demand and supply function of labour in a competitive industry find
out
Demand function: LD =1200 – 10w
Supply function: LS = 20w
How much labour will be hired by the industry?
What is the wage rate?
How much economic rent earned by the labour employed.
Solution:
A competitive labour market equilibrium wage rate and employment are
determined by demand and supply forces.
LD = LS Substituting w = 40 in labour demand function
1200 – 10w = 20w Ld = 1200 – 10w
1200 = 20w + 10w = 1200 – 10(40)
30w = 1200 = 1200 – 400
1200
= 800
w= 30 Thus equilibrium wage rate is Rs.40
w = 40 Equilibrium employment/labour hired is 800 workers
Derivation of Demand for a Factor
Reference: Perfectly Competitive Market
HL Ahuja
Solution:
At equilibrium D = S Economic Rent = Area above supply
curve, below equilibrium wage rate
1200 – 10W = 20W
= ½ of (W * L)
W = Rs.40
= ½ (40*800)
Substituting w = 40 in one of the equation
Economic Rent = 16,000
S = 20W i.e 2*40
Quantity of labour = 800 units
Reference:
Product Exhaustion Theorem
Koutsoyiannis
LN Dwivedi
How share of factors of production in total output is determined
The Adding-up Problem/Controversy
Whether the sum total of factor income/prices, determined by their marginal
productivity, equals the total product?
If each factor is paid the value of its marginal product (VMP), does this mean the entire
output is exhausted and nothing is left that falls into the hands of exploiting capitalist?
If factor shares are added to unity
1 = (share of labour) + (share of capital)
Q = (MPPL)L + (MPPK)K
PQ = (MPPL*P)L + (MPPK*P)K
PQ = VMPL + VMPK
PQ = Value of Output
If factors are paid a price equal to their VMP, the total factor payments will exhaust the
total value of the product i.e marginal productivity theory leads to the correct ‘Adding
Up’ of the factor shares
Reference:
Euler’s Product Exhaustion Theorem
Koutsoyiannis
LN Dwivedi Homogenous production function with constant returns to scale
Q = MPPL*L + MPPK*K
𝜕𝑄 𝜕𝑄 𝜕𝑄 𝜕𝑄
Q= .L + 𝜕𝐾 . K ( 𝜕𝐿 = MPPL & 𝜕𝐾 = MPPK)
𝜕𝐿
Proof;
A production function, Q = f(L,K), is homogeneous of degree v if
f(λL+λK) = λv.f(L,K) ……………… (1)
By differentiating equation (1) with respect to λ
𝑑𝑓 𝑑𝑓
L𝑑𝐿 + K𝑑𝐾 = vλv-1f(L,K)
When there is constant returns to scale, v = 1, then equation (1) be written as
L(MPPL)+K(MPPK) = f(L,K)
If VMPL = w and VMPK = r
Q = MPPL(L)+MPPK(K) PQ = VMPL.L + VMPK.K
Multiplying MP by the price of product, P PQ = w.L + r.K = TR
PQ = (MPPL*P)L+(MPPK*P)K Thus, proved that if each factor is paid a sum
equal to its VMP, the total value of product is
PQ = VMPL.L + VMPK.K exhausted.
Product Exhaustion Theorem
Is it possible for a firm to pay each input the value of its MP if it operates
with given production function.
Q = 14K0.6L0.3
Total revenue is not enough to pay each input the value of its MPP
Do It Yourself
Q = 4K + 1.5L
Yes
Q = 8K0.4 L0.3
No Surplus
Q = 3.5K0.25 L0.35 R0.3
No Surplus
Reference:
HL Ahuja Factor Inputs
Investment is an addition made to the physical stock of capital during time period
Building, roads, airport, machinery etc
Capital
Capital is a stock concept
Capital accumulated over period of time
Stock of productive assets
Fixed investment – machinery & equipments, residential and, building and inventories
Investment
Flow concept
Measured per unit of time ---- one year
Addition made to the physical stock of capital
Change in capital
Concepts of investment
Reference:
HL Ahuja
LN Dwivedi
Gross Investment
Total addition made to capital stock in a year
Total annual expenditure on plant, building, machinery, residential land etc
Net Investment
Gross investment minus depreciation
Depreciation is the worn-out capital and obsolete capital goods
Obsolete due to change in technology/product going out of demand et
Autonomous Investment
Induced Investment
Interest Rate
Reference:
HL Ahuja
LN Dwivedi
Rate of Interest
I = f(r)
Inverse relationship between rate of interest and investment
If nominal interest rate is 8% and inflation is 2%, what is the real interest rate?
Real Interest Rate = Nominal Interest rate – Inflation
= 8% - 2%
Real Interest Rate = 6%
Reference:
Loanable Fund Theory of Interest
HL Ahuja
LN Dwivedi
Interest Rate
SL
Criticisms
Savings --- largest supply of funds – depends on
E
disposable income r
Investible funds ---- depends on income
Interest cannot be known without income
DL
0 L
Loanable funds
Reference:
HL Ahuja Keynesian Liquidity Preference theory
Keynes: Interest is the reward for parting with liquidity for a specified period of time
Demand for Money: Desire of people to hold wealth in the form of cash
▪ Transactionary Motive
▪ Precautionary Motive
▪ Speculative Motive
Supply of Money : Total quantity of money in the economy for all purposes, at a
particular time.
▪ Determined and controlled by government and monetary authority.
▪ Interest inelastic
Keynesian Liquidity Preference theory
Reference:
HL Ahuja
Transactionary Motive
▪ Liquid cash for daily transactions
▪ Depends on income motive (individual) and business motive
▪ It is a function of money income; Interest inelastic
Total Demand for Money = L1 + L2
Precautionary Motive Active Balance; L1 = Lt + Lp
▪ In order to meet emergency/unexpected consequences Idle Cash Balance; L2 = Ls
▪ Constant function of money income, insensitive to interest rate
Speculative Motive
▪ Purchase and sale of bonds/securities
▪ It is a function of interest rate
▪ Inverse relationship between interest rate and bond price
Reference:
HL Ahuja Keynesian Liquidity preference theory
Determination of Equilibrium Rate of Interest
Demand for Money = Supply of Money
LPC = Liquidity Preference curve, DD for money
Interest Rate
Rise in r, at OR1, fixed supply of money at R1b S
▪ S > D, surplus funds results in lowering interest rate
Fall in r, at OR2, demand for liquid cash is R2d;
▪ D > S, push up rate of interest till it reaches OR, equi a b
R1
point
E = OR E Liquidity
R
Liquidity Trap Trap
LPC
R2
c d
LPC becomes perfectly elastic
Position of absolute liquidity preference, to keep
cash idle 0 Q
Floor level of interest rate, below which it cannot D & S of Money
fall
Reference:
HL Ahuja Keynesian Liquidity preference theory
Criticisms
▪ Real factors ignored
▪ Time preference, productivity etc on interest rate
▪ Effect of inflation ignored
▪ Theory is based on actual and expected price stability and ignored inflation
▪ Importance of Productivity ignored
▪ Interest rate is a reward for capital productivity, not for parting
▪ Short period analysis
▪ Ignores long term analysis
Reference:
HL Ahuja Land and Rent
Ricardian Theory of Rent
For the original and indestructible power of land
Assumptions:
Rent accrues only to land
Land has no alternative use except for cultivation
Superior or most fertile land are cultivated first
Fertility of land differs from one to another
Law of diminishing marginal returns operate
Technology is constant
Reference:
HL Ahuja Concepts of Rent
Rent – reward for land
Contract Rent: Price paid per unit of time for the services of a durable good
like land, house, machine, car, furniture, computer etc
Economic Rent is any excess of payment made to a factor of production
over and above what is necessary to keep it in its current activity.
Economic Rent: Differential surplus
Surplus of the yields of supra marginal (more fertile) land over the yields of the
marginal (least fertile) land
Transfer Earning: Supply price of the factor measured in terms of its
opportunity cost
What a particular factor could earn from its next best alternative use
Transfer earnings are the minimum which must be paid to a unit of a factor to
retain in its present activity or use.
Quasi Rent: Short run earnings of some factors of production
Temporary; For Capital Equipment; Due to increasing demand.
Reference:
HL Ahuja Ricardian Theory of Rent
Main Postulates of Ricardian Theory
Rent is the return for the use of Land
Rent is paid for the use of original and indestructible power of the soil
Scarcity of fertile land
Un-uniform quality of land
Rent is a Differential Surplus
Differential surplus earned by more fertile plots of land with less fertile plots of land
Differential Rent/Surplus = Yields of supra-marginal land – Yields of marginal
land
Land A B C
Supra marginal land: Earns rent equal to the difference of its surplus yield over
the yield of marginal land
Marginal land: No rent land
Reference:
HL Ahuja Ricardian Theory of Rent
Wheat cultivation
Land A = 100qtl ------- D for Wheat = 70qnt
Land A = No rent
Population increases, D = 150 ; Land A = 100;
Land B: 80qnt
Land A = Rent; 100 – 80 = 20qntl of wheat
Land B = No rent, marginal land
Population increases, D = 200, Land A = 100, Land B = 80
Land C = 70qnt
Land A Rent = 100 – 70 = 30qnt of wheat; supra marginal land
Land B Rent = 80 – 70 = 10qnt of wheat; supra marginal land
Land C Rent = 70 – 70 = 0 rent; marginal land
Reference:
HL Ahuja Modern Theory of Rent
D!
0 B
Land
Reference:
HL Ahuja Determination of Profit
JB Clark
Factors responsible for changes in economy and resulting in Profit
Change in quantity or quality of human wants
Changes in methods or techniques of production
Changes in the amount of capital
Changes in the forms of business organisation
Dynamic economy
Innovation
Exogenous changes
Reference:
HL Ahuja Schumpeter’s Innovation Theory of
Profit
Profits are the reward for an entrepreneur as he introduces Innovation
Profits emerge because of innovation
Types of innovations
Reduce cost of production
Introduction of new machinery, new and cheaper technology, new source of
raw material, new method of organisational management
Increase demand for the product
Introduction of new product, new design/variety, new method of advertisement,
discovery of new market
Profits are only temporary and competed away
THANK YOU