0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views3 pages

Rigger Response

Prof. Shelley Rigger's lecture discusses the contrasting perceptions of China from Taiwan's perspective, highlighting how Taiwan's cultural identity has remained largely unchanged despite historical upheavals in Mainland China. The lecture emphasizes Taiwan as a preserve of traditional Chinese culture, especially in contrast to the Cultural Revolution's destructive impact on such traditions in the PRC. Additionally, it notes the CCP's recent efforts to revive traditional culture as a means of reinforcing national identity and legitimacy.

Uploaded by

eh626
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views3 pages

Rigger Response

Prof. Shelley Rigger's lecture discusses the contrasting perceptions of China from Taiwan's perspective, highlighting how Taiwan's cultural identity has remained largely unchanged despite historical upheavals in Mainland China. The lecture emphasizes Taiwan as a preserve of traditional Chinese culture, especially in contrast to the Cultural Revolution's destructive impact on such traditions in the PRC. Additionally, it notes the CCP's recent efforts to revive traditional culture as a means of reinforcing national identity and legitimacy.

Uploaded by

eh626
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Erin Huang

GOVT 3967

Nov. 16th, 2021

Prof. Allen Carlson

Prof. Shelley Rigger Lecture Response

Prof. Shelley Rigger’s short history of Taiwan highlights a distinction between

internal and external perceptions of China as a series of modifiers, some of them

being Ancestral/Cultural China, or Internal/External China. Like in Prof. Millward’s

discussions about the importance of wording, translation, and meanings, the modi-

fiers indicate the presence of an alternate context than just whatever the singular

condition of “China” may be.

Rigger’s explanation about how Taiwan and its residents largely missed the

train that was the formation of a national identity through the tumultuous period of

Chinese history post-1949 leads to some additional thoughts about her framing of a

historical Taiwanese view of China. As she says, “In Taiwan, the China that was hap-

pening from 1895 through the early decades of the 20th century was Ancestral

China, Cultural China, the memory of our origins in Mainland China, but it was not

the everyday reality of Taiwanese people that they were living in, or participating in

a Chinese state.” The collective memory of China from the standpoint of somebody

in Taiwan is thus one in a suspended state of animation, largely unchanged even

during events such as the Cultural Revolution. In an interesting reversed condition,

however, what Taiwan knew of “Cultural China” was actually under rapid change

during the years of the Cultural Revolution—if anything, Taiwan remained “Cultural

China” while Mainland China arguably lost, and destroyed that culture.
For some Chinese, especially overseas Chinese, Taiwan is seen as a place

where Chinese cultural and religious traditions have been preserved, unaffected by

the sweeping and destructive actions of the Red Guard towards old customs, cul-

ture, and arts. The religious buildings, temples and sacred spaces of Mainland China

that were destroyed during the Cultural Revolution remain in Taiwan, and many

families in Taiwan, uninterrupted by the Great Leap Forward and work placements,

are able to trace their ancestry back many generations. Folk religions, superstitions,

and customs that are still common in Taiwan were squashed in the PRC during the

Cultural Revolution and under a Marxist framework. One such example of Taiwan as

a preserve of traditional Chinese culture is the National Palace Museum, a store of

historical and cultural artifacts often lauded as better than anything the PRC has to

offer in its own museums.

The CCP doesn’t often speak of or acknowledge the role the Cultural Revolu-

tion has played in damaging traditional Chinese culture, but Xi Jinping’s encourage-

ment and cultivation of old cultural traditions points to the central government’s

new focus and prioritization of a national identity, wholly and fully, from conceptions

of ethnicity and race to cultural identity as well. Children are encouraged to learn

traditional arts such as calligraphy and ink painting, and official state programs

have been instated to facilitate the traditions. The recent explosion in the popularity

of Hanfu and traditional dress, especially in young people, are also encouraged by

the state, reinforcing an ethnic and cultural identity. This neotraditionalism has be-

come an important party stance, with Xi calling traditional culture the “foundation”

of the Party’s own culture and “vital wellspring” of the Party’s own socialist values.

Like how the CCP drew its modern bounds from historical Qing boundaries at the

peak of their size, support of cultural traditions offers a sense of historical legiti-
macy to the modern nation, as if directly engaging in the same actives (calligraphy,

music, art), etc that previous dynasties have also done. Neo becomes the modifier

in this situation, with new conceptions and meanings of a Chinese culture and tradi-

tion embedded in this kind of traditionalism. Key in this understanding is also the

implication of place: that it is most authentic because it happens in China, com-

pared to cultural production in other diasporas, or even a territory like Taiwan.

You might also like