Forced and Compulsary Labour
Forced and Compulsary Labour
f"TDV1'/l.u) >v
lStrl ~
.Jhy
t
Qv •
e,µ'
~ 96
~hb .M.D
to~ud..J ~
~ - £.<n,v.>t. ,nro \M() ,' ok<) 1;.Q~ Pir-o t~
~ ~w~~~-~
- ~~ No, 18.2.. ~ 1-8)
FOR CED AND COMPULSORY LABOUR
1The Force d Lab C . rn
.
mg Forced
the full title of which is the Conve t
n. ion Conce
l.'. our onven t1on,
.
or Compulso1y L bour, I 9J0 .. .
a (No.29), 1s one of eight I LO fundamental convent,ons[2] of the
lntem ation al Labour o rgan1z · Its obJect
· at1on. • and purpose ·,s to suppress the use off'.1orced
the sector of activity in which
labou r in all its forn~-s irrespective of the nature of the work or
work or service which is
it may be performed . The Convention defines forced labour as "all
for which the said person has
exact ed from any person under the menace of any penalty and
ulsory military se~ic e.[ 3]}
not offere d himse lf voluntarily", with few exceptions like comp
imposition of forced ·
The conve ntion excludes "adult able-bodied males", to whom legal
labou r is allowed .[4]
ratify the convention. Cmrnda ratified it in 20 I I and as or 2015 the United States has nnt
ratified it.[5]
Exceptions to Convention
·
(a) any work or service exacted in virtue of compulsory military service 1aws for work of a
..
purely military character,
. . bl. .
(b) any work or service which forms part of the normal c1v1c o t oat1ons of th ..
~ e c1t12ens of a
fully self-governing country;
(c) any work or service exacted from any person as a consequence of a conviction in a
nd
court of law, provided that the said work or service is carried out under the supervision a
control of a ~ublic authority and that the said person is not hired to or placed at the disposal
of private individuals, companies or associations;
(d) any work or service exacted in cases of emergency, that is to say, in the event of war,
of a calamity or threatened calamity, such as fire, flood, famine, earthquake, violent epidemic
or epizootic diseases, invasion by : animal, insect or vegetable pests, and in general any
circumstance that would endanger the existence or the well-l?eing of the whole or part of the
population;
(e) minor communal services of a kind which, bei11g performed by the members of the
.
community in the direct interest of the said community, can therefore be considered
.
as
.
normal civic obligations incumbent upon the members of the community, provided that the
members of the community or their direct representatives shall have the right to be consulted
in regard to the need for such services.
A11icle l I of the Convention states that forced or compulsory labour may be imposed only
upon "adult able-bodied males who are of an apparent age of not less thari 18 and not more
than 45 years".
~ : 0bolition of Forced Labour Convention , 1957, the full title of which is Convention
' concerning the Abolition of Forced Labour, 1957 (No. I 05), is one of the eight ILO
fundamental conventions of the Jnternational Labour Organization, which cancels certain
forms of forced labour still allowed under the Forced Labour Convention of 1930, such as
punishment for strikes and as a punishment for holding certain political views.
In order to jmplement the 1930 Forced Labour Convention and the 1957 Abolition of Forced
Labour Convention, the S ecial Action Programme to Combat Forced Labour was set up
------:---,
A~~ l li.
Constit~ti~oal provision for Elimination of all Forms of Forced or C~mpulsory Labour.
--...
(_rhe pripcipl~ of the eli~ination of all forms of forced or co?1pulsory labour is recognized in
India. The Constitution of lndja, Utlde1article 23 Jprohibits forced labo Art· l 2
· . · • · ur. , tc e 3(1) states
that "traffic in human . beings . and begarand_other similar fo~s of ~ d ·
. , ,orce 1abour are
proh1b1ted and ~1y contravention of this provision sha]l be a: .
, . . . an ouence punishable in
h
accordance with
. ,
law»
.
.. Vanous
,
·udicial
J
article 23(1). of the Constitution of I d.
. .
pro
. d" Yb
nouncements ave. upheld the dcfin ..
n ia as m icated further. "Traffic .
lttons und.e.r
m human beings"'
U 01 ~ ~ iA t, ~
. .
· ~:-:---=- ~ : PVDR. y .
~~~ ~~m ,
~~
, ~Lf~
()JJ
{_~ ctiAfri~
~1 ru rt ,tb A 0--ct,
.i,~~ s~ fl
t ~ .~ · ·0 h " . Jc. fi, .. _ ± ,~
~- r l(.v1..o ludes~
I
M-, . Ov u • (z3 .
"""'- 41U ,
State of ~ ~
lraffit. in \ or other purposes (ShCJ111a 1•.
~ ) inc and children, for
· vomen imm ora l
· ~ J..Jon;(_
,_ ,,
by government or a person 111 ' • ..;{ A
MP . [Link] 5-~·~
.......;.:.._;,
i-1) ,rnB· ..
Jl~ eg ar means "labou r of serv ice exa cte d
67); Sur oJ
·
v. a..;
1°'"C .~
!~t,,
power w 1th out giv · · remunerntion for it" (Vas11de11011 v. Mi110I, Bombay 53(
d" ~
• ing ~.
dhy a Pra des h J01 tFo /ce d Labour": Labour may be "force
Srate 0/ Madhya Pradesh, Ma as a.,t i h ~
forc e but also on acc oun t of a legal provision such
al
not only owint to physic
. also .owing.· 10 r -{;~ ?~ .fi 'IiJ.~_
vide the service, but
. risonmeoi -Or' .&r:ie in
imp cas e the em plo yee fail s to pro
yment for remuneration which
IS less r0~
hunger and p ~ which com
m
pel
wag e
s him
(Pe
to
opl es
acc ept
Un ion
em
,,.
plo
Union o[l nd ia, Su pm ne Coun
147 0 ~G
th• n .the statutOQ' minimu t,..., ~ to
·
· ivU v'~ 1frQ
fl,- Ov i~ ~
, Sup r~m e Cou rt 328 ). e..t tA .W ~
Sanpt v. Stare q/R_ajasthtm -~ '1-ftX JNM J.v,._ Ji- 4.v
r- ~ ~ ,
~ :~ v .• uo
~ ~ l O J.... W 'fotWI.. ~ .
pulsory la~our as deQned
111 ~ h)~
-=:- w-{_,~
and reg ula tion s ;
in') ~e c?u nlry do suppress forc~d or com
lLa ws 23(2 ) 0 ~ the ~'
~en tion No . 105 _- ~e o~ly excepli?n made is ~rticle
Article I of ILO Gon ll prevent it from
wh ich . stat es :[Link] J "no thin g in .this A11icle [(23) (I) ] sha
Constitution ,
ng such .service~ the stare
ng com pul sor y ser vic es for public purposes. and in im·posi .
imposi ,
any of
gion. race. caste or class or
.
legislature .
t it cannot be taken away by the
fundamen1al right implying tha
able in acc ord an ce
Co nvention No. I05, is punish
.Cr
orced labour, as defined in Article l of
st t dd res s such
icia l mechanisms-and procedures ex·
, 1 oa
.ifa,
Jaw. Appro priate leg al and jud
with the
violation~
constitution
7 ,_c~ildren rights un~er the
1Ch,Jdren on account of their tender age and immature mi nd need specia. l care and r .
~ entitle ts th p otection.
s eciaf [Link] and le al at are b .
The have cer tain men
stitutio n of d. . emg acknowledged
ally . The con In ,a recoon12cd the . h
~ationally and internation
l art icles d r . b - ng ts of chi ldren for
lud ed sev era .
the firs t time and inc ea rng With their Jibe
rty, liveli hood, and
ls0 ry nnd frt' t:
development of childhood, non-discrimination in educationnl spheres, compu
ous ind ust ri cs.
education a nd prohibition of their employment in factories, mines and hamrd
. They ore 1101
Socially a nd physically children are the weakest element of the society
no sny in any of th e
responsible for many of the cases and do not deserve to suffer . They have
1924 dec'.umtion of
•~atters of evils like war or external deb~ It has been rightly slnted in the
nll child cnuses
rights of the child (declaration of Ge/eva) that has now been used for
.~ _Y investing in
"mankind owes to the chills the best it has to give". Children nre the futurc
societies will have a bright future:)
them
\\ l Right to educ~tion ~ - · . . . . .
slulc shull provide free uml
) ( Articl e 21-A of the constitution slates lhal "right lo .[Link]:alio11-lhe ,.
\: ( 6-14 l <>ii . a manner ns
compulsory education to a11 children of the age of "'(six to fourteen years m such
the state may, by law detennine."The Supreme Court in its liberal
interpretation 0f life nnci
s libeny bur nlso
liberty as under A,ticle 21 held that the term libe,ty not only include
includes livelihood but also the right of human beings to live with
dignity and rhm also
fundamenllll right under
includes the right to education, and therefore, right to educarion is a
hy the suprem e ccn11:1s
the constitution. The case of Mohini Jain case came to be fo1tifiecl
right to educa tion cnn
subseque~t constitution bench of Unnikrishnan !s case, which held that
prirna,y educational level and not to higher . seconq my levc9
be restricted to
ix years-
all children until
Th~ State shall endeavor to provide~ arly childhood care and education lfor
they complete the age of six [Link] article. has been substituted by
the Const itutio n
S6-tt- ·
on nee. 12 2002.
(eighty-sixth [Link]!nl) ad, 2002 which received assent of thr. Prcsirlcnt
nlso been
By this all'.!endment a new(brticle 2~ providing for right to education has
inser tj~_; s [Link] keeping with th~ hope expressed in the ~up~me Court in Ullnil
[Link] I]
and ohm1 Jam[2] that conversion of the State's obhgatJon under
Article 45 into n
fundamental right would help achieve the goal at a faster speed ITo · ·
\.: as 1s now also a
.
fundamental duty of parents and guardians to educate such children as provided
· I
ofArticle 51-A) c nusc (k) . "'
(! 1R 7l'\ll"("," '·•.dli '•::;:..n',i '<ii ' · ~ ' , ., , _- · "" , , .... , -
""::.z'U-!)i~·~.-'ffr~"S·~,~·u '.~ ')'/'',·!'l"
:._1•'socy-
,.lf 1~
-·
-~ "'"·'.:>,--,, ••m- ,,
.'' . •; - "' · . .
- . • .. - -- - ..... ·s-. .,..... -lx,, .. 1
sua_ ·t t? . -e~V0tt! ~f0'r p''fov,·a~~~\, ~-,~ni '.t?l' ~:-~'Q. d""l\.\ ,:=i~'.~l.'<-t"."'~:i.,:\ ,'>' :\:d"-""··•:-,nt.,,..... •
': Qt' ·ten-··years'· 1 to'-.-,,;· t:t•\ i_:1>:t .~ l . . ·,._
, . . ' · "'t.
..., ~ , ~......... · .• . <- }•',Ji ,,,.v. •l ::: q -. - • -
l ,(IC <:QtJ)nl'e'n "'·
· - • -.-, , - ·
•
t,...., , , ..... .
C4{~,~t_itl!!iff•f ;~f fieK'irrffit~
.. , .,
:M11l~ re-.i~tfflctTf
· · • -• ···
b ':: t.~.~: , 1-1.....li,...1lgce1. 'i-!_j ~ - •• · ~- "'~ cemc . · _ :· .. ~tit
n mtil't e
~
· ·- ·· • ··- _,_.__ · . ,: :£ >-- . ·-- • ~ _1 _ ~ ¼ qr.~ c
- ··-· . -··~·./ _ Y~~~m.,1
·« -
1,. -.-{ _·1..
~~ tll~
- •
age· or
•
fo1111ecn ye . ,, .
n1 s . lmvcvcr I his . I I .
comn,e ----- · gon ins not hcc11 r1cl11cvcd even after fifty years of the
nccmcm of the Co . . . .
fro d' llSlltut,on . It was held lhat there was nothing to prevent the State
rn ischarging thAt s0 Iemn obl'1gat1on. ~
. . through the government and aided the schools and
Article 45 docs 1 • ·
lot require the obHgation to be discharged at the expense of minority
commonities.[3]
(1t was held in the case of ohini Jain v. stale of Kamatnka nd others, Al R 1992 SC 1858
· are fundamental in the governance of the country cannot be .
· · Ies which
The dircctiv e prmc1p
isolated from the fundamental rights guorantced under part Ill. These principles, have to be
read into the fundamental rights. Both are supplementary to each other. Th~ state is under the ·
constitu_tional mandate to create conditions in which the fundamental rights guaranteed to the
individuals under part Ill could be enjoyed by a'9Without making "right to education'' und~r
Art AI of the constitution a reality the fundamental righls under Chapter JII shall remain
beyond the reach of large majority which is illiterate."Right to life'· is the compendious
~xp1·ession for all those rights which the courts must enforce because they are basic to the
dignified enjoyment of life. It extends to the full rnnge or condu<.:t "hich the individual is free
to pursue.~he ri2ht to education nows directly from ri!!ht to [Link] . .1.P and other
v. State of Andhra Pradesh and others 1\ IR 1993 S.C. ~ I 7S··Tl11.: firs\ question is whether the
right to life guaranteed by A11icle 21 docs nol tnkc in 1hc ,:ight to or not. It is then that the
se<.:ond question nrises whether the Slate is taking away 1hc right as at present does not mean
that right to education is not included in right to life. The content of right of life is not to be
determined on the basis of existence or absence of threat of deprivation .
•
The right to education fu11her means that a citizen has_a right to call upon the State to provide .
educational facilities to him within the limits of its economic capacity and development. By
saying so it does not mean the transferring Article 41 from Part IV to Part Ill. The judges
stated that they were merely relying upon Article 41 to illustrate the· content of the right to
education with the right to life. The judges further stated that it is improper to believe that the
State woul~ not provide education to its people even within the limits of its· economic
capacity and development. Thus t~; court in the case of Unnikrishnan overruled the judgmen t
of Mohini Jain on the basis that right to education covers only the primary level education
and n~t the secondary level.
Rights against exploitation
j Article 23 states that "prohibition of traffic m human beings
a nd forced labour.-
t
wh,c h are hazardous to. the · health of the children. In the case of [Link]: juS ice
M.M .Punchi expressed his thoughts on child labour. He ·stated that "I see in this scheme
{child labour) \•aried kind of benefits accruing depending upon the social strata in which such"
0
schemes are introduced. It would be an ideal transition to adulthood; it will provide a sence (
th
responsibility and instill confidence and pride in the work of the child~ very imported!y e
. • . . b · ·11 be an extremely constructive
c h I1d will understand the concept of dignity and 1a our, it wt
th
use of time by the child, and it will also be a ~velcome so~rce of income in e family.· .." .
The judge was also quoted saying that the elimination of child labour altogether would be
n r--,-.. -<"'-
CO p Ct ~.J' . · . ·,
harsh ... Boys Hoste!-
ll_ I) ..L..,.C,.....h_i_ld_l_a_bo_t_11_·:....... P. U, CH:)
} • A11iclcs 23 and 24 of the constitutions determine the term ·'.c hild labour" .
. [Link]. acr W(IS enacted on 23rd December · 86 by the parliamenyand was enforced on 26th
0
Jlia v 1993 by the cc,11rnl governmcnt~c act ,was ineffective for over 8 ·years due lo the
;,~·activeness of the state and central govcrn1.1 1en~le object of the act is
Jr'ban on the c1-1-1ployment of children i.:,e., those who haven't completed their fourteenth
. .
··- regulate the conditions of work of children in employment where they are not prohibited
from working; . .
Quvenile .- delinqueri_ts f1av~·. _ been :Jooked upon differently by persons. To a lawyer, they. ate
Ill inors who are: accu~ tl of Jtre,[Link] from which they are inunun~ . the pu11islu11t:nls ·if1at ai~
usually administered :to adults.e psychologists they a·re youngsters wh~se social b_ehavior
patterns show deviations from acceptable [Link] take a different view by stating that
they are neglected children who have been brought into the world by parents who have turned
their back on their offsprings and let them shift for themselves[ IO]. Juvenile delinquency is
\ ' ' 1
indeed a social problem. Economic insecurity, tmder nourishment, inadequate clothing and
\ . . ..
tack of necessary medi care may lead to delinquency. The state has to give these-children
heller cai::e and make ;Lhirn good citizens. The government is d<;>ing its best to contaip•the
problem of juvenile [Link],,. In India the first legislation concerning children \Yas
enacted in· 1850 wfwn the apprentices act was passed. The act provided that the father or
guardian could bind :the child between the age~ of 10 and 18 years. -Magistrates were
authorized to be tpe gua:rdiiin of each oestitute child.
19.:~:
( The cr_i~i-nal ./~~:::~'.~fe_~:,::_~ od:~: containe
provisions . ·dealing with juvenile
'--aelingllenc_Yi SectJqrN'~:' ,J!tb'~~[Link]~ reads
"any offence not punishable with death or imprisonment for life, ·committed by any person
who at the date when he appears or is bough"t before the court is under the age of sixtey~
.. I 1,y· ti ie court. of a ch"1e [Link] d1c1a
..years, may L, t: IJ·it:u . CJ M
.. I mngistrntc, or by any court specially
· powered under the children act 1960 or any other law for the time being in force providing
Such a child
lllust be co
mrtHl1 cd '> 8 r
pants or the gu 8 rd . ernand home ·1he officer 111 <,hi1rjc'.c 'lh,,uM ,nf,,r,r, lt.e
mn to be . '
officer in ch present when the 1:hild 1, produced hcforc rhe 1uvcmlc v,urt ·rhe , I _ ~- --
- .ivdt ~• 11,,- ~
~
argc should also . fi . , J~"'e.- ~ "'
'I Aims of .
Th ·
,
JUVthilt iustic:r
· ·
In onn lhe probation of ficcr .
.
fr,,.. ,
- ., u , ~ ,"U - U Cl ~~-
~ ~
.).}. .-u
-~
C jUVcn,lc jUstice s l h - ~ ,_ i.J illvv / e-b ~
. . ys cm s all cmphasi1.c the well being of the juvenile l,ffende, mu~ T.>eUn ~ . . .
pro port ion to the · · . .. ·,..
circum st ances o[ both the offender and the of fence . ·, here tJre rw,, rn,jJ"'
objectives of juvenile justice. They are
~t_!}e well being of the juvenile
-4.'~he principle of proportionality', which is intended curb ' punitive ~ancti<,n'> _c:xpres~
10
in ju st deserts in relation'to the gravity of 1he offence', and t~ ensure that the response tr, the
younger offender be based on the cqnsideration not only of the gravity of the offence but also
of the personal circumstances'.
~ h i l e the reaction must aim t; ~nsure the [Link]•the un 1 offender ·1 must no go
beyond necessity and, therefore -infringe upon the [Link] young individual
Legal [Link] and prosecution
ll1e Beijing rules c:,f IO(initial contact). I l(clivcrsion), 12(spccial ·police units) and 13(
detention pending trials) address them~elvt:s 10 1hc fair and humane appro,ll:h that musl be
shown, and the procedures that must be scrupulously followed by the police upon the
apprehension of the juvenile, and the care humanness. firmness and solicitude for nelfare that
must be consciously bestowed by !he personnd on his admission into the juvenile detention
centre.
~ itial contact-upon the ~pprehension of the juvenile the parents must be immediately notified
of such apprehension. The initial contact between the juvenile and the police and the other
: : : ::,je juvenile homes must _respect the well being of the juvenile and must not ham,
Princip1e . 8: . the
'-ptM¥cJi~n . and relief
c~ifd .m'ust.,.::. .b~: ~ Jhe :;:.-f.i~st;:;tiL . .ecehi~: .':~
'dyJo~ris-ofcruGit ·:ii~gtc.cr_t.:xplt>ilalion. ~fhc
f'1111ci_µJ(: 9: ·ll•~···dtiJ1HJiull . : pr0,l~·¢{~U,:.'ffy1ri #_
chj}ijts}f~lh1pt be· ~cf!nitted,.tqi~lli ~fr~i,f 'f1fr a'pprqpr.i~te .rn,ni,m,lfi~\jig~~which W.9U
plhy~~TTi '
Id
,, , . . ,. ~
'
. preiYitF~.hl~l~~,thj
PBW4N( :;·i o.-~ th~~4~b,0~~'tiffa{f~~»~:wrg.f~~f~8r?tt~ifll -i>.rAit~~~·[Link]~~:, m~r-I~ro~f~r-'-'·~~(ii =
~J ;t- 6,e idea of codifying children 's righis under ~he constitution
has been _severely criticized. It
Cl1lturnl divergences of th1.: drnfrers
· _is argued that the dillcrenl views stemming from the
ing and bring about a---dilution of
cause vaguene~s, over breadth, la~k of comprehe11sive plann
is to set rules for the protection ,
already esrablished rights.[ l2J8ut the aim of the convention
bod0 ,,
of minors whose application will be monitored by a UN
-to ~ ~--1:orf lM .
the
certain circumstances ·
•
gulation and -Abolition) Act, I970 Iwas enactedto regulate
ployment cf contract labour in certain establishments and to • •
1
,
· m
provide "or ·1s abo 1·1t1on ·
Applicability:
-~ ~ - t o -~
filgJ
Non-apelicability:~ n establishment which performs an · intennittent orcasual nature of
1·'·
work.-The appropriate Government shall· decide upon the intennittent or casual nature
of work after consu It at i"" with the Cen tra I Boa rel/ [Link] Boa
1Difference Between:\
Registration of Establishment employing Contract Labour
• or more
_. ~ Qplicab\e to every establishment (Principal employer) which employs 20
contract \abour
.~ The Principal Emp\oyershall apply for registration of anestablishment before the regi 51ering
officer
_ ·This is not renewable on year to year basis
_ Certificate of Registration need not be displayed at the establishment by Principal
Employer
Licensing of Contractors
.:,_ Applicable to every c_ontractor who employees 20 or more workmen
_ J'he Contractor shall obtain a license from the Licensing officer
- This is valid for only one year / should be renewed before due date.
~~ - License ·shall be displayed prominently at the premises where the contract work is
o/ ~ e Convention eoncerning the Prohibition and Immediate Action for the Eliminati~n J
of the Worst Forms of Chil<l Labour, known in short as the §,orst Forms of Child _
[ Labour Conventi~;J was adopted by the International Labour Organization (ILO) in 1999 as
~
l LO Convention No 181 Lt is one of ei!!ht ILO fundamental conventions.
I .._
1
By ratifying this Convention No. 182, a country commits itself to taking immediate action to
prohibit and eliminate the \\0rst forms of child labour. The Convention is enjoying the fo~lc~t
pace of ratifications in the ILO's history since 1919.
The ILO's International Prourammc on the Elimination of Child Lnbour (IPj;:C) is responsible
for assisting countries in this regard ns well as monitoring compliance. One of the methods
used by I PEC to assist countries [Link] regart~ -~re Time-bound Programn: , .
The ILO also adopted the Worst Forms of Child Labour Recommendation No 190 rn 1999.
This recommendation contains, among others, recommendations on the types of hazards that
should be considered for inclusion within a country-based definition of Worst Forms of
·~ ~ ~ ~~~
=::
Hazards faced by Child::" at Work µ.-¼) ~o;t.i.,,w,,o
~~ I- ~ £ 4 ~ ~ y~~;i:io)-) . . . - ~
(Ratifications 1 . t-vuo_-- ~ wa111+ ~ 1 u--..; u '- ~
s2 out of 1s1"ft.o membe;t tes. ~ ~ -
6i of 2018, the convention has been r~ufied by 1_
.0· 'P ~
Predefined wontforn1sofc/1ilt/lubour C,~?}
"1rtitk.l. _ WU~
Convention 182 in~ludes fonns of child labour, which are preae}m;a worst fonns of
labour. They are also sometimes referred to as automatic worst fonns of child labou;:
w~ ~
The predefined worst forms of child labour are: · ~
• aU forms of slavery or practices similar to slavery, such aslfil
o the sale of a child;
•
trafficking or productibn of drugs
work hy its nt1h1re that is likely to hann the health, safety or morals of children
\
Worst form hazards: To be defined by each ratifying country
~e last category of worst fonn ~f child labour is work which by its nature or the
circumstances is likely to hann the health, safety or morals of children, or Worst Fonns of
Hazards faced by Children at Work:_ Here t~e Convention recommended that the
circumstances should be determined in consultation with organisations of employers and
0
r workers wirhin a specific country)rhe [Link] reco111me nds that program"!1es of acti'on
[Link] attend specifically to younger children, the girl child, hidden work situation in which
. .
girls are at special risk, and other groups of children with special vulnerabilities or needs.
~rst Fonns of Child. Labour Recommendation :No )90 cont~ins recomme~dations on the
types of haz,[Link] that should be considered to be included within a cou~1trv-based definition of
~ . ~ . . . ·I ~ l .
~ Jk ½- .~ ~ 1 o - f v=-~ ~
~J.)
.~
\\Ork rhat rs done under par11cular/y difficult cond1t1ons such as ~rk
ll)
~ 0
Labour; .
· · · f Child Labour ,
rhe Elimination° . . of children.
0 International Programme on
rcial sexual explo1tat1on .
0 Country programmes OJJ Comme . . d hild pornography
. hild prosr,tut,on an c
Rappor teur on the sale .o: _children , c --------~-:::;- p ;J1 Lia~
~ ~~
The Special
~
P
lays a role in the co-ordination of act,vrties )
~ ~ ~~-~
~
,..;,.._ CV)?/> ~
·~ ~; -:~1
~ ,~~
~~ i- ~ _,to 'Poo\Jtl.J1<>~ oe~ Ad ~ ployme ~~ C 38 ~L ~,/-
L' fipur Or1!aniiatin!_l. It requrres ~~
The ll.O ~ 111 , ·cnlton concerning Muumu ~
0
- ,
1
by tl1e _fulan,'.• hlll~ ., re the eflective abolition of i:111 Id I if,.,~~' ,J(J
is ;i ,:,'') ·, .:.:nri,111 ;idopred in I 973. al po/,cv deSH!lle to ensu . - .,. - '...Jf.J..,,
. , :-: . -- - . . . I ·. ·i ~mplO\ J11('1Jt Lll \\ llr "'- ~
ratih Ill!!- states 10 pursue a nation, . : - . ,· >II Ill rv
- . . . I the lllllll/Oll lll ii!!'-' UI ,I( Jllb~ ( .
of labour. ~
i,dx•ur and IO rarse p,ogress,ve y I . ·1 · f LO conventions in specific fields
~~
Conve111io11 C/38 replaces severa s11111 a1
-Po
~~ ~11 ·'-->
Minimu m ages
years. A I /~ ~
Countn•es ate. ree
fi to specify .a minimu . m aee
for labour,. with a minimu
. .m of 15 o,., j,-
. r
~
/4 years is also possible when for a specifie d period of time. Laws may aho l,.A.,-v'
so ~'
"C(
. ·
declarat,011 0 •
Th,- '-:-' ~~~,,' - ,
pemlit light work for chil~ren ag~d 13-15 (nokt hah~hm'~ thl~kir healt~ or scd~oolt 1wohrk). , ~ -v.
d for wor e1y to Jeopar ,se 1e ea 1t
:::, of· 18 .,vears 1s specifie
· · n aoe .. w 1c 1s I .
mm11nw
safety or morals ofyoung perso~s". D_efinit,ons of the ty~e o~ work ~d ~erogat1ons are
only
possible afrer uipartite consu/tat,011s (1f such a system exists m the ratifying country).
Ratifications
Entry into force of ILO Convention CI 38 occurred one year after deposition of two first
ratifications (Cuba and Libya). As of Janumy 2018 171 countries·have signed Conve t ·
C138. Initially, however, the pace of ratification of this Convention was extreme) 1n ion
Therefore, an altemati\.'e Convention with a more limited scope has been initiatedyi~ ~~- ill
It ~o~cems ILO Convention 182 concerning the Prohibition and Imm~diate Action for the
Ehmmation of the Worst Forms of Child Labour. _
Convention Cl 38 enters for a ratifying country into force one year after ratification. Th is can
be denounced every 10 years in the year after IO years have passed (e.g. 19 June 2027 - 19
June 2028). ·
lt is the 189th ILO convention and was adopted during the 100th session of the International
Labour Organization_Hl (tentered into force on 5 September 2013. rn
Rights
The m~in rights giv~n to <lomcstic workers as sjgcQOt ~vork arc d~ily and weekly ~at least 24,
h) rest hours, [Link] to minimum ·wagc and to choose the pince where they Jive and
spe:nd their [Link]. Ratifying states parties should also take protective measures against
violence and should enforce a minimum age which is consistent with the minimum age at
other types of employment. Workers furthermore have a right to a clear (preferably written)
communication of employment conditions which should in case of international recrn i tment
be communicntccl prior lo i111111i!n11li011. Tlu.:y an.: flirthcrnwrc not required to reside at the
house where they work , or to stay at the house during their leave_ 81
The convention was put to vote on I 6 June 2011 by a vote at the [LO conference in Geneva.
As JL0 is a tripartite organization, for every cot1ntry the [Link], employers and workers'
representatives are entrtled to vote. The convention was adopted with 396 votes in favour and
16 against (and 63 abstentions).w All Persian Gu]f S!ates voted in support, while abstentions
were cast by (amongst others) the United Kingdom.~1 _
The convention entered into force one year after ratification hy two countries whir.h is a
standard entry into force condition for IJ ,O conventions. Ratifications are to he
communicated to the Secretary-General of the ILO.
on-26 April 2012, the -Uruguayan parliament npproved the convention and thereby became
t~e- fi~st _c_o~ntry to ratify it,lfil followed by president!)ll assent on 30 April 201211) and deposit
0 . • _., .
its instrument of ratification in June [Link]