See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/379048840
Prompt Engineering For Large Language Model
Research Proposal · March 2024
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11549.93923
CITATIONS READS
7 9,005
2 authors:
Hemil Patel Shivam Parmar
Deggendorf Institute of Technology Deggendorf Institute of Technology
1 PUBLICATION 7 CITATIONS 2 PUBLICATIONS 7 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Hemil Patel on 18 March 2024.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
Prompt Engineering For Large Language Model
Shivam Parmar, Hemil Patel
ABSTRACT: This paper presents an innovative exploration into the burgeoning field of prompt engineer-
ing, a critical skill in the era of advanced artificial intelligence, particularly in the realm of Large Language
Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. Prompt engineering, the art of crafting precise and effective prompts, is piv-
otal in guiding LLMs to adhere to specific guidelines, automate complex processes, and ensure the integrity
of both the quality and quantity of their outputs. We introduce a novel compilation of prompt engineering
techniques, methodically formulated as distinct patterns. These patterns are analogous to the concept of
design patterns in software engineering, offering versatile, adaptable solutions to common challenges faced
when interacting with LLMs. Our research details diverse frameworks for prompt engineering, shedding
light on their potential to address a spectrum of problems encountered in information retrieval processes.
We also explore various pattern-oriented strategies that have been proven to elicit enhanced responses from
AI models. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive guide to these prompt engineering patterns, offer-
ing valuable insights and practical approaches that will empower users to harness the full potential of their
interactions with LLMs, thus making a significant contribution to the field of AI communication.
1 INTRODUCTION
The journey of artificial intelligence (AI) has been marked by significant milestones, particularly in
the domain of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and generation. The advent of the advanced
neural network architectures, like the Transformer model introduced by Vaswami et al. (2017),
revolutionized the field, leading to the development of powerful language models such as the gen-
erating pre-trained Transformer (GPT) series (Brown et al., 2020).THese model are developed to
demostrate the uncapable capacity to generate the human -like text, setting a new benchmark for
AI performance[1].
In the rapidly advancing domain of artificial intelligence (AI), Large Language Models (LLMs)
such as ChatGPT have emerged as a cornerstone of natural language processing, offering unprece-
dented capabilities in generating human-like text. However, the efficacy and relevance of their outputs
are significantly influenced by how they are prompted. This phenomenon has given rise to the field
of ’prompt engineering’, a nuanced discipline that merges the art of linguistics with the precision of
programming.
Prompt engineering is not merely about posing questions or commands to an AI. It’s an intricate
practice of strategically designing prompts to effectively harness the underlying model’s capabilities.
This process becomes crucial in ensuring that the AI comprehends the context, adheres to specific
constraints, and fulfills the intended purpose of the interaction. As LLMs continue to permeate
various sectors - from creative writing to technical problem-solving - the skill of prompt engineering
becomes indispensable for users aiming to extract the most value from these models.
This paper delves into the intricacies of prompt engineering specifically tailored for Large Lan-
guage Models. We explore the underlying mechanics of how LLMs interpret and respond to prompts,
and how this understanding can be leveraged to refine the quality of interactions. Furthermore, we
present a series of structured strategies and patterns, akin to those found in software engineering,
which serve as a guide for constructing effective prompts. These strategies are not only theoretical
but are also backed by practical examples and case studies, showcasing their application in real-world
scenarios.
Through this exploration, the paper aims to bridge the gap between the latent potential of
LLMs and the practical challenges faced by users in various domains. By providing a comprehensive
1
framework of prompt engineering techniques, we endeavor to equip readers with the knowledge to
skillfully guide LLMs, thereby enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of their outputs.
Figure 1: A wordcloud is employed to illustrate the research hotspots, focal points, and direction in
prompt engineering.
2 DEFINITION AND PRINCIPLES
Prompt engineering is the process of structuring text that can be interpreted and understood by a
generative AI model[2][3]. A prompt is natural language text describing the task that an AI should
perform[4].The prompts should exhibit clarity, specificity, and a lack of ambiguity, so enabling the
LLM candidate to gain a precise comprehension of the assigned work. The use of imprecise or
ambiguous language may result in misunderstandings and incorrect results. Sufficient context and
instructions should be adequately supplied to aid the LLM in interpreting the prompt and ensuring
that its response aligns with the anticipated goal. The aforementioned tasks encompass furnishing
contextual details, elucidating essential terminology, and stipulating the preferred manner or de-
meanor of the final product. Incorporating illustrative examples or demonstrations into prompts can
enhance clarity of expectations and offer tangible reference points. This feature proves to be partic-
ularly advantageous in the context of creative endeavors, such as the creation of poems or scripts,
since it allows for the provision of illustrative instances that effectively demonstrate the intended
style and format. Iterative Refinement: The process of prompt engineering is characterized by its
iterative nature, necessitating ongoing refinement and correction in accordance with the responses
generated by the LLM. As the LLM system produces results, it is possible to alter the prompt in
order to offer additional guidance or rectify any potential misinterpretations[5].
3 THE ROLE OF PROMPT ENGINEERING IN AI DE-
VELOPMENT
Prompt engineering is a rapidly growing field within the realm of artificial intelligence (AI), par-
ticularly in the context of large language models (LLMs). It encompasses the art and science of
designing and crafting prompts, which serve as instructions or questions provided to an AI model to
elicit specific responses. Prompts act as bridges between human intent and machine output, ensuring
that the AI understands the desired task and produces the appropriate result.
Importance of Prompt Engineering
2
The significance of prompt engineering stems from the fact that LLMs, despite being trained on
massive datasets of text and code, lack an inherent understanding of language or intent. Prompts pro-
vide essential context and guidance, enabling the model to interpret the task correctly and generate
meaningful responses.
3.1 Key Roles of Prompt Engineering in AI Development
Prompt engineering plays a pivotal role in various aspects of AI development, including:
1.Enhancing Specificity and Focus: Prompts direct the AI’s attention to the core aspects of the
task at hand, preventing it from straying off on irrelevant tangents. They can also specify desired
formats or styles for the output, such as answering questions in the form of summaries or generating
creative text formats like poems or scripts.
2. Manipulating Creativity and Style: Prompts can modulate the creativity and style of AI-
generated text. By providing specific instructions or examples, prompt engineers guide the model
towards a desired tone, style, or genre. This is particularly crucial for applications like creative
writing or code generation.
3. Adapting to Diverse Tasks and Domains: Prompt engineering enables AI models to seamlessly
adapt to a wide range of tasks and domains. By tailoring prompts to the specific requirements of
each task, developers unlock the full potential of LLMs to tackle diverse challenges in areas like
education, research, and customer service.
4. Addressing Bias and Fairness: Prompts can play a significant role in mitigating potential
biases or unfair outcomes in AI systems. Carefully crafted prompts can help eliminate stereotypes
or discriminatory language, ensuring that the AI’s responses are fair and unbiased.
5. Promoting Iterative Improvement and Innovation: Prompt engineering is an iterative process,
with developers continuously refining and improving prompts based on feedback and results. This
iterative approach fosters a dynamic and adaptable approach to AI development, enabling developers
to push the boundaries of what AI can achieve.
Prompt engineering is an indispensable skill for AI developers, empowering them to harness the
power of LLMs for a multitude of applications. By meticulously crafting prompts, developers can
ensure that AI models comprehend the intended tasks, generate meaningful responses, and avoid
biases or unfair outcomes. As AI technology continues to advance, prompt engineering will play an
increasingly crucial role in shaping the development of intelligent and versatile AI systems.
4 METHODS OF PROMPT ENGINEERING
Prompt methods are specific techniques or strategies that can be applied within different prompt
patterns. They provide concrete steps or approaches to enhance the effectiveness of prompts. Some
common prompt methods include:
1. Explicit Instructions: Clearly state the task or desired outcome, providing the LLM with
unambiguous guidance.
2. Style and Tone Specifications: Specify the desired style (e.g., formal, informal, poetic) and
tone (e.g., humorous, serious, informative) of the output.
3. Example Prompts: Provide examples of similar text formats or styles to give the LLM a
reference point and encourage desired patterns.
4. Information Retrieval: Supplement the prompt with relevant information from external sources
(knowledge bases, databases, etc.) to enrich the context and guide the LLM’s understanding.
5. Context Amplification: Emphasize or highlight key aspects of the task or context within the
prompt itself to focus the LLM’s attention on essential elements.
6. Summarization Prompts: Guide the LLM to summarize lengthy or complex information,
identifying main points, eliminating unnecessary details, and presenting concise and informative
responses.
3
7. Creative Prompting: Rephrase, reformulate, or present the task in different ways to encourage
creative solutions or approaches, leading to novel and unexpected outcomes.
8. Iterative Refinement: Continuously evaluate the LLM’s responses and refine the prompts
accordingly, leading to improved prompts and better-quality outputs.
9. Prompt Combination: Combine multiple prompts into a single prompt to elicit a more com-
prehensive and multifaceted response, particularly useful for tasks that involve multiple aspects or
perspectives.
10. Diverse Prompting: Utilize a variety of prompts with different styles, formats, and approaches
to encourage adaptability and flexibility in the LLM’s responses.
11. Domain-Specific Prompts: Tailor prompts to the specific task and domain at hand to ensure
effective guidance and relevant results within the domain context.
12. Clear and Concise Language: Use clear, concise, and easy-to-understand language to avoid
ambiguity and ensure accurate interpretation by the LLM.
13. Prompt Optimization: Optimize prompts for the specific LLM being used, considering its
capabilities, limitations, and strengths.
14. Feedback and Experimentation: Experiment with different prompts and gather feedback to
identify effective techniques and refine the prompt engineering process.
5 PATTERNS
Figure 2: These shows Different types of Prompt Engineering Techniques
5.1 Instructional Patterns
Instructional Patterns in prompt engineering are used to structure prompts as clear. direct instruction
to guide the large language models to give the desire output very precisely and accurate especially
in studies of Natural Language Processing (NLP).
1.Direct Instruction: This Involves explicitly stating what the AI should do or These are straight-
forward and direct command or requests to the AI, Like ”convert 10cm into m”.
2.Step-by-Step Guidelines: This patterns is used when user wants to provides sequential instruc-
tions or question to the AI model where task requires depth, detail and precision.
3.Task-Specific Prompts: Task-specific prompts are designed to guide the AI model to perform a
specific task or to produce a specific kind of output.
4.Feedback-Based Adjustment: Feedback-Based Adjustment involves creating an intial prompt,
analyzing the response from the AI, and then adjust the prompt based on this feedback to improve
subsequent response.
4
5.Structured Query Formatting: Structured Query Formatting involves crafting prompts that
are clear, direct and formatted in a way that guides the AI to understand the extact nature of the
information being requested.
5.2 Question-Based Patterns
This prompting patterns is a strategic approach where the prompts are designed and formulated as
Question. It has various key elements to obtain a efficient output.
1.Clarity and Specificity: Question are clear, precise and reduce ambiguity which guide the AI
model to produce the specific output. For example:- ”What are the difference between Project
Manager and Product Manager?”
2.Open-Ended Question: These type of question allows the AI model to give a brief and detailed
information about the question asked. For example:- ”How can artificial intelligence impact the
future of Automobiles Industries?”
3.Closed-Ended Question: This requires very concise, compact, specify and straightforward in-
formation. For example:- ”How many hours a student in germany can work full time?”
5.3 Comparative or Contrastive Patterns
1. This pattern hinge the AI’s ability to parse and understand complex relationships between sub-
jects, assessing them against a set of criteria to highlight either their similarities or differences.
5.4 Zero-shot and Few-Shot Learning
This patterns allow a user to crfat prompt that model can understand and respond to it accurately
without being directly trained on that specific task.
1. Zero-shot learning is used for tasks where the user wants to obtain large labeled dataset is
impractical or impossible.
2. Few-shot learning demonstrates the model’s flexibility in adapting its responses to slightly
varied tasks with minimal guidance.
3. Few-shot model responses to refine further andd adjust the prompts, enhancing the accuracy
and relevance of the output.
6 CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS
This section delves into the intricacies and obstacles associated with prompt engineering, particularly
in relation to Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT.
1. Uncertainty and Misinterpretations - Challenge: The potential for AI models to misconstrue
prompts due to vague or insufficient context. - Consequence: Such misinterpretations can result
in responses that are off-topic or nonsensical. - Illustrations: Instances demonstrating how vague
prompts have led to unintended AI behaviors will be analyzed.
2. The Intricacies of Human Language - Challenge: The inherent complexity and subtleties
of human language pose significant challenges for AI comprehension. - Consequence: Difficulty in
formulating prompts that precisely communicate the intended query or statement. - Examination:
The section will explore linguistic subtleties like colloquialisms, humor, and cultural references that
are challenging for AI.
3. Ethical and Moral Considerations - Challenge: Ensuring AI-generated responses align with
ethical standards and social norms. - Consequence: Inappropriately designed prompts might lead
to responses that are biased or unethical. - Deliberation: The significance of crafting prompts that
mitigate harmful outputs and uphold ethical standards is discussed.
5
4. Inherent Biases in Responses - Challenge: The tendency of AI to reflect biases present in
its training data. - Consequence: Propagation of stereotypes or biased information. - Approaches:
Strategies to develop prompts that reduce bias and encourage impartiality will be explored.
5. Technological Limitations - Challenge: The current state of AI technology has inherent limi-
tations in understanding and generating complex concepts. - Consequence: These limitations bound
the effectiveness of prompt engineering. - Prospective Developments: Ongoing advancements in AI
that may overcome these constraints are discussed.
6. Variability Among Users - Challenge: Differing levels of user expertise in prompt engineering
can affect AI interaction quality. - Consequence: This leads to unequal AI effectiveness among diverse
user groups. - Remedial Measures: The paper discusses how user education and intuitive design can
help bridge this gap.
7. Uniformity and Scalability - Challenge: Developing prompt engineering strategies that are
consistent and scalable across various applications. - Consequence: Inconsistent strategies can lead to
variable AI performance. - Dialogue: The section addresses the development of universally applicable
prompt engineering methods.
8. Privacy and Security Concerns - Challenge: Balancing the need for effective prompts with the
requirement to protect sensitive information. - Consequence: Potential limitations in AI applications
due to privacy concerns. - Assessment: Strategies to balance prompt engineering efficacy with
safeguarding data privacy are examined.
7 FUTURE DIRECTION
In this we will discuss about the challenges, current direction, and future opportunities and develop-
ment direction of the prompt-based methods.
Firstly, the challenges in the prompt engineering are addressed, including the data scarcity in the
medical NLP domain, the interpretability of the models, and inherent issues in prompt engineering.
Secondly, the current research directions are introduced, which include prompt generation, prompt
optimization, mutlimodel data processing, and deep reinforcement learning. These research directions
aim to improve the effectiveness and applicability of prompt-based methods, further promoting the
development of the NLP field.
Here are some specific trends and techniques that we can expect to see in the future of prompt
engineering:
1. More focus on chain-of-thought prompting. Chain-of-thought prompting is a technique that
helps LLMs to generate more logical and coherent outputs. It involves providing the LLM with a
step-by-step guide on how to solve a problem or complete a task. This is likely to become a more
widely used technique in the future, as it can help LLMs to perform more complex tasks.
2.More use of few-shot learning. Few-shot learning is a technique that allows LLMs to learn new
tasks from a small number of examples. This is particularly useful for tasks where there is limited
data available for training. We can expect to see more use of few-shot learning in the future, as it
will make it easier to use LLMs for a wider range of tasks.
3.More use of templates. Templates are a way to provide LLMs with a structured format for
their outputs. This can be helpful for tasks that require a specific format, such as writing emails
or reports. We can expect to see more use of templates in the future, as they can help people to
generate more consistent and high-quality outputs from LLMs.
4. More use of prompt tuning. Prompt tuning is a technique that involves adjusting the param-
eters of the LLM to optimize its performance on a specific task or prompt. This can be helpful for
tasks where the LLM is struggling to generate the desired output. We can expect to see more use of
prompt tuning in the future, as it will make it easier to fine-tune LLMs for specific tasks.
Overall, the future of prompt engineering is very promising. It has the potential to revolutionize
the way we interact with the computers and to enable new and innovative applications in a wide
range of fields.
6
8 COMPARISON TABLE
Feature With Prompt Engineering Without Prompt Engineering
Response Rele- High relevance as prompts guide Potentially lower relevance due to
vance the model’s focus vague queries.
Response Accu- Improved accuracy due to clear, Possible inaccuracies due to ambiguous
racy specific prompts requests.
High, as promtps are tailored to Variable, depending on the model’s de-
Task Suitability
specific tasks fault training.
Higher, as prompts reduce the Lower, may require multiple iterations
Efficiency
need for the follow-ups to refine the response.
User Intention Clear, as detailed prompts specify Unclear, leaving the model to interpret
Clarity intended outcomes the user’s intent.
Context Under- Enhanced, through contextual Limited, relying on the model’s general
standing cues in the prompt knowledge.
Creativity and Guided creativity based on struc- Unbounded, which can lead to creative
Exploration tured input but irrelevant outputs.
Lower, as users may provide natural
Steeper, as effective prompt craft-
Learning Curve language input without special format-
ing requires skill
ting.
Output Pre- More predictable, as prompts Less predictable, due to less guided in-
dictability guide expected outcomes teractions.
Specificity of In- Higher, as prompts can request Lower, may result in generalized or
formation detailed information broad information.
Adaptability to High, especially with zero-shot Limited by the model’s pre-existing
New Tasks and few-shot prompts knowledge and biases.
9 CONCLUSION
The utilization of large language models has become increasingly important, and as a result, engi-
neering practices have evolved as a crucial tool for properly harnessing their possibilities. Through
the development of well-constructed prompts, individuals have the ability to direct LLMs in produc-
ing outputs that are both accurate and insightful, while also being succinct and instructive. The
role of prompt engineering is expected to become increasingly significant in harnessing the full po-
tential of LLMs and driving improvements across many domains. Engineering has a crucial role in
facilitating the connection between human intention and machine implementation, hence facilitating
efficient communication and cooperation between people and LLMs. The utilization of LLMs enables
individuals to effectively use their capabilities for a diverse array of undertakings, encompassing the
generation of innovative textual structures as well as the analysis of intricate datasets. The increasing
complexity of LLMs and their expanding range of applications necessitate the ongoing evolution of
quick engineering, which will assume a more significant role in influencing the trajectory of artificial
intelligence.
The future of prompt engineering is promising, as it possesses the capacity to significantly alter our
computer interactions and bring about transformative changes across multiple industries. With the
continuous advancement of LLMs and the refinement of engineering methodologies, it is anticipated
that a plethora of creative and groundbreaking applications would arise. The field of engineering has
promise in facilitating the connection between human creativity and machine intelligence, thereby
paving the way for a future characterized by collaborative problem-solving and the emergence of
novel opportunities through the joint efforts of people and LLMs.
7
References
[1] Attention Is All You Need. arXiv:1706.03762v7 [cs.CL] 2 Aug 2023 https://arxiv.org/pdf/
1706.03762.pdf
[2] Diab, Mohamad; Herrera, Julian; Chernow, Bob (2022-10-28). ”Stable Diffusion Prompt
Book”Retrieved 2023-08-07.”Prompt engineering is the process of structuring words that can
be interpreted and understood by a text-to-image model. Think of it as the language you need
to speak in order to tell an AI model what to draw.”
[3] Albert Ziegler, John Berryman (17 July 2023). ”A developer’s guide to
prompt engineering and LLMs - The GitHub Blog”.”Prompt engineering is the
art of communicating with a generative AI model.” https://github.blog/
2023-07-17-prompt-engineering-guide-generative-ai-llms/
[4] Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019).
”Language Models are Unsupervised Multitask Learners” (PDF). OpenAI blog. We demonstrate
language models can perform down-stream tasks in a zero-shot setting – without any parameter
or architecture modification. https://cdn.openai.com/better-language-models/language_
models_are_unsupervised_multitask_learners.pdf
[5] J. Gu et al., ”A systematic survey of prompt engineering on vision-language foundation models,”
arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12980, 2023.
[6] ”Prompt Engineering: A Detailed Guide For 2024” by DataCamp.
[7] ”What is an AI Prompt Engineer and How Do You Become One?” by TechTarget.
[8] ”Six skills you need to become an AI prompt engineer” by ZDNet.
[9] ”ChatGPT Prompt Engineering for Developers” by DeepLearning.AI.
[10] ”What is Prompt Engineering? - Generative AI - AWS”.
8
View publication stats
