IN THE COURT OF THE LD.

SESSIONS JUDGE, HYDERABAD

AT HYDERABAD, TELANGANA

BAIL APPL. NO.XXX OF 2023

IN THE MATTER –

Mr. Prashant Sharma …...…..PETITIONER

S/O Rahul Sharma

R/O Gandhinagar Hyderabad

-VERSUS-

STATE OF HYDERABAD .............RESPONDENTS

BAIL APPLICATION NO.2245/2023

IN CRIMINAL CASE NO. 5567 OF 20….P.S. …………. P.S. No. …./20…. Under Sec. 300 ,
302 of IPC

An application under Sec. 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, prayer for the release
of Accused No.2, Prashant on bail.

The humble Petition on behalf of the above-named Petitioner.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-

 1. That the Applicant is a law-abiding citizen of the country, having permanent residence at
the above-mentioned address. He is a PhD. holder in English, gainfully occupied as a
professor for 15 years at Kakatiya University in, Warangal, Telangana. He has received
many prestigious awards for his academic excellence over this time. He comes from a
very reputable family in his village. He has a family consisting of his wife and two
young daughters aged 15 and 18 years.

2. The above-named Petitioner is not the sole accused in the present case and the Petitioner
has been arrested by the police of Hyderabad. The petitioner is now in police custody.
The Petitioner is a PHD holder and professor at Kakatiya University in their village. The
accused belongs to a good family and is only bread winner of the family. He has a good
reputation in the society and was unaware about the plans of the main accused.

Factual Background:

3. The case as per the prosecution is as follows:

4. Ms. Swathi Mishra daughter of Mahesh Mishra , a 24-year-old woman, was in love
with Ramesh Uikey a 25-year man . Both of them desired a wedding. The families
opposed Ramesh and Swathi's marriage since Swathi was from a Brahmin family and
Ramesh was a Dalit. Nevertheless, the pair married on April 8, 2023, despite the
desires of their parents, and they left Warangal for Hyderabad, leaving behind their
little town's restrictions.

5. A few years later, they had improved their living conditions and financial situation.
Swathi contacted her folks to express her happiness one day. Swati's father meets
Prashant before the incident and tells him to accompany him to his daughter's house
because Prashant had a car and it will be easier to go. Because Prashant has a helpful
disposition, he accompanied him to his daughter’s house .The plaintiff (Prashant) and
her father (Mahesh) paid them a surprise visit the following day in Hyderabad for
 reconciliation. While they were having a conversation, her father (Mahesh) took out a
gun and shot both of them, leaving them dead on the spot.

6. After the incident, Prashant was afraid and fled the scene without saying anything
because he was unaware of Mahesh's plan. After a few hours, he attempted to contact
the police to alert them of the situation, but Mahesh threatened him to kill his family
as well, so he did not go to the police.

7. The police arrested her father and the plaintiff after the neighbours filed an FIR
against them. As per the scenario the applicant has been falsely implicated in the
instant case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence.

8. That Her wife and the applicant assured us that they were unaware of Mahesh's
intentions, and that he would not have followed him to Hyderabad if they had been.
And there were no such details discovered during the investigation that suggest
Prashant was aware of the scheme . Then also he has been detained for the previous
two months.

9. He was the only earning member of his family and if he remained in jail, then every
member of the family would get into a survival crisis. Their family has an excellent
reputation in their village. And the plaintiff has never fought with anyone or done
any mischief. Prashant is suffering from a very rare disease. This disease can be
cured only in AIMS in Delhi, and no other hospital has special equipment and means
to cure this disease.

10. That the applicant is having good antecedents, he belongs from a good family, and
there are no criminal cases pending against them. That the applicant is a permanent
 resident and there is no chance of absconding from the course of justice. That the
applicant undertakes to present before the court or police whenever required to.

11. That the applicant undertakes that he will not, directly or indirectly, make any
inducement, threat or any promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case
so as to dissuade him to disclose any such facts to the court or the police officer. That
the applicant further undertakes not to tamper with the evidence or witness of the
case in any manner.

12. That the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court.
That the applicant is ready and willing to accept any other condition the court or
police officer willing to impose in relation with the case .

PRAYER

It is therefore prayed that the court may order for the release of the applicant in the order of the
justice. And the other order which the court may deem fit and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the case may be also passed in the favour of the applicant.
BEFORE THE COURT OF THE LD. SESSIONS JUDGE, HYDERABAD

I, Prashant , S/o Rahul Sharma , citizen of India, aged about 54 years, R/o Gandhinagar ,
Hyderabad , a PHD holder and professor at Kakatiya University college I do hereby solemnly
state and affirm as under:

1. That I am duly authorized by the said petitioner to make this affidavit on its behalf.

2. That the accompanying bail application has been drafted by my counsel on my

instructions and contents of the plaint have been read over and explained to me in
vernacular language and I have understood the meaning and implications thereof and the
facts stated therein are correct.

3. That the contents of the suit are not being repeated here for the sake of brevity and same
shall be considered as part of this affidavit.

DEPONENT