ANCHOR (Gaana)
A warm welcome to respected sir and everyone present, we are here to present
our play on a very famous case of cannibalism, where Surendra Koli who was
the servant of Moninder Singh Pradhan are the 2 main accused of the Nithari
Case.
Back in 2006 disappearing of children and women from Noida sector 3 made
national headlines. This wasn’t a common thing for the residents of this place.
People of Noida were terrified by this incident which were occurring
continuously for the pace of 2 years.
REPORTER AND PARENT
REPORTER (SUMMIT) – AAJPAT NEWS MAI AAP SABHI KA SWAGAT
HAI
Aaj ham NOIDA district se seedhe prasaaran karte hue iss ilake mai horahi
Insaniyat ko sharamsaar kardene wali ghanta ke baareme aap sabhi darshakon
ko batata hu
Reporter (SUMMIT) – aap kanaam kya hai
Parent (amit) – Nandlal
Reporter (summit)– aap mujhe yeh bataye ki aap yaha kitne saal se reh rahe hai
aur aapke saat kya hua hain
Parent (amit) – ham yaha sahab 9 saal se reh rahe hai, 1 saal se hamari ladki
gayab hai aur koi hamari madat nhi kar pa raha hai
Reporter (summit)– to police ne iss ke liye koi action nhi liya kya , aapki beti
ke baare main kya keh raha hai prasashan
Parent (amit)– Ji police neh abhi tak koi case nhi darje kiya hai hamare beti 1
saal se gayab hai aur koi sunwai nhi horahi hai police prasashan soya hua hai
ham jabh bhi jaate hai to ye keh ke hame bhaga dete hai ki aapke bete to kisi
ladke saath bhaag gayi hogi, uski marzi ke khilaaf ham case kaise lelen.
Reporter (sumit)- toh aap ne police ke iss bartaav ke khilaaf koi complaint nhi
karwayi, court se aapko ko kya madat mili?
Parent (amit)– hum sahab Gareeb hai, hum gareebon ki kon suntan hai, hum
bohut pareshan hai.
Reporter (sumit ) – kisi aur ke saath bhi aisa hu hain kya iss ilake mai
Parent (amit) - haan, yahan kam se kam 18 bache gayab hue hai D-5 number ki
kothi ke pass se
Reporter (sumit)– to police ne waha jaach padtaal nhi ki kya, kya sabke bchhe
gayab hai?
Parent (amit)– hamari ladki ko hum rikshe pe baiuthaye the rikshaw ala usko 5-
D ki kothi ke pass choda tha aur wo tabse gayab hai. Aur police kuch nahi kar
rhi.
REORTER TO GENERAL PUBLIC (sumit)– Jaisa ki aap sabh dekh sakte
hai ki koi sunwai nhi hai prashan koi case nhi darje kar raha hai D-5 ke kothi
me kya aisa raaz chupah hai
Aage ki Khabar ke liye dekhte rahe AAJPAT NEWS.
ANCHOR
As the guardian of these missing victims were not satisfied with police probe,
after several requests and pleading the court finally approved to look into this
serious matter later, the court intervention made the police to form a special
team. They tracked KOLI who was a servant in that wealthy house. This house
belonged to Moninder Singh.
The police summoned KOLI
AFTER 60 DAYS OF CUSTODY KOLI CONFESSED IN FRONT OF
POLICE IN THE PRESENCE OF MEGISTRATE.
CONFESSION
UP Police (himanshu) – aap k yaha se payal ki sim ka last network milla tha, is
ke baad gayab hua.
Kohli (abhishek)- kon payal main nahi jaanta ho
Up police (himanshu) - sidhe sidhe baata raha hai ya tere ko kare teda.
Kholi (abhishek)-. acha mai ap ko batata ho sir. vo payal ko bulaya krr ta tha
aksar or os ko 25 hazar diya krrta tha, mai os ko chupe k dikh ta tha ki vo kya
krrta hai.
Up police (himanshu) - phir payal ka kya kiya?
Kholi (abhishek)- maine os ko ek din phone kar k bulaya tha ye bol k ki ek
party aae hai os k liye. Vo vaha aati hai fir maine os k liye chai banae or os ko
bola ki vo party aane mai thoda time hai tab tak vo muj entertain krre. Maine os
ko 500 rs offer kiya prr osne galat Tarik se muj os baat ka jawab diya. Or maine
gusse mai osk dupate se os ko hi maar diya.
Up police (himanshu) – phir
Kohli (abhishek)– fir maine os ko upper bathroom mai leja krr os k body parts
ko kata or Plastic bag mai dall krr piche naale mai phek diya.
Up police (himanshu) - tumne aur bachon ke saath kya kiya
Kohli (abhishek)- mene kayi bacchon ko marke, katkar paka kar khaya hun.
(magistrate will be sitting during the confession silently)-(Anchor)
ANCHOR
After initial probe by the local police the investigation was handed over to CBI
where 16 cases were filed against koli, in all of them for murder, abduction and
rape, besides destruction of evidences and Pradhan was booked for immoral
trafficking.
The accused appealed in the HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
The proceedings in the said case are as follows.
ADV OF PETITIONER (Roshni)
According to section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act, the statement should not be
considered a confession.
The convict made the confession to the magistrate in the presence of the police
after 60 days of being under custody. After which the police started digging up
the nearby land and discovered the children's bodies.
The convict asserted that “the police tortured him to confess all kinds of
information including the name, manner of killing of the victims”. But in
reality, the police tortured the convict to confess the false information in order
to protect his own life.
The convict is a mental patient who needs a doctor than being held with a
capital punishment.
I would like to conclude my argument by stating that this is the one of rarest of
the rare case and would request to consider my argument
ADV OF RESPONDENT (Madeeha)
With the permission of your lady ship, I would proceed
there was a confession made by convict before the magistrate under section 164
Crpc and it was a voluntary confession
even though the magistrate repeated consoled the convict that he was not bound
to make the statement and it can be read against him
as mentioned under the article 21 of the Indian constitution. The crimes
committed by the accused directly violate the constitutional rights of the
victims.
According to the fact of the case it doesn’t leave any doubt that the appellant
has committed horrifying and barbaric killing of innocent children.
This case revolves in the category of the rearrest of the rare case where the
concept of cannibalism is also been highlighted
I would like conclude my argument by stating that the order deems fit in the
interest of justice, equity and good concise.
ANCHOR
The bench will declare the following decision.
JUDGE (Arzoo and insha)
In the facts of the case, there is no evidence of last seen against the accused and
the motive on part of the accused is not established.
Therefore, accused has no criminal history and was working as a domestic help
for the last nearly 6 years at Noida without any complaint.
In light of the evidence presented Court found insufficient evidence to support
their conviction. Surrendra Koli is aquitted in 12 cases and Moninder Singh
Pandher acquitted in other 2 cases.
ANCHOR
CONCLUSION
This case of 2006 constitutes one of the biggest and bizarre urban crimes which
have been recognized as the rarest of the rare by the courts at several instance.
Not just the families but the entire nation was reverted when the body parts of
the victim were found in and around. This was the 1st time the assertion of the
right of this speedy trail was articulated in the magna carta. Nithari killing
severe the most horrible crimes but people often forget such miss fortune with
the passage of time since an accused can only be hanged once, the disposal of
case and impact on the society by the due administration of justice will always
suffer in the absence of clear and timely law enforcement. This clearly signifies
that there is a need of developing a mechanism that would help in affective
dealing with case of such nature were the prime accused is same in every case.
